Current Approaches to Design Space Development and Regulatory Applications for Drug Products: Findings from the IQ Utilization of Design Space for Filings Working Group Survey.

PURPOSE: The concept of a Design Space (DSp) was introduced in ICH Q8 as a tool within the quality-by-design (QbD) approach to pharmaceutical development with the intent of being globally applicable. However, there appears to be variance in the regulatory agency expectations in pharmaceutical product filing and implementation of DSp. This paper presents some of the current industry perspective on design space. METHODS: The Utilization of Design Space for Filings (UDSpF) Working Group in the Innovation and Quality (IQ) Consortium conducted a survey to establish a baseline for the current understanding of DSp among IQ member companies and assess the similarities and/or differences in strategies when filing a DSp. The survey focused on how IQ member companies approach DSp development, the primary drivers for the DSp, the presentation of the DSp in the filing, DSp verification and the benefits and flexibility anticipated and/or realized. RESULTS: A total of 14 responses were received and analyzed representing a small sample size but a large proportion of the innovator industry/large pharmaceutical companies. The survey results revealed that DSp is not yet a commonplace for small molecule drug products and may not even be utilized as much in large molecule drug products. The benefits of DSp, with respect to enhanced process understanding, are well understood by the sponsors; however, the benefits of filed DSp with respect to manufacturing flexibility are not fully realized in the commercial lifecycle of the product. There are also challenges in gaining consistent buy-in/value proposition for DSp among cross-functional teams within organizations. CONCLUSIONS: There are still gaps in design space implementation for its full benefit in the pharmaceutical industry. The WG has presented a unified view from member companies on the approach to DSp considering when/where the DSp experiments are conducted and on the extent of the DSp development proposed in a dossier.

An IQ Consortium Perspective on The Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on the Need for Nonhuman Primates in Biomedical Research, Production and Testing of Products and Devices (Update 2017).

The recent Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on "The need for nonhuman primates in biomedical research, production and testing of products and devices" (2017 SCHEER) highlights approaches that could significantly contribute to the replacement, reduction, and refinement of nonhuman primate (NHP) studies. Initiatives that have the potential to affect NHP welfare and/or their use are expected to be appropriate, fair, and objective and publicly disseminated information focused on NHPs in biomedical research, which includes toxicologic and pathologic research and testing, should be objectively evaluated by stakeholder scientists, researchers, and veterinarians. Thus, IQ Consortium member companies convened to develop an informed and objective response, focusing on identifying areas of agreement, potential gaps, or missing information in 2017 SCHEER. Overall, the authors agree that many positions in the 2017 SCHEER Opinion generally align with industry views on the use of NHPs in research and testing, including the ongoing need of NHPs in many areas of research. From the perspective of the IQ Consortium, there are several topics in the 2017 SCHEER that merit additional comment, attention, or research, as well as consideration in future opinions.

Industry perspective on the nonclinical safety assessment of heterobifunctional degraders.

Targeted protein degraders (TPDs), which act through the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS), are one of the newest small-molecule drug modalities. Since the initiation of the first clinical trial in 2019, investigating the use of ARV-110 in patients with cancer, the field has rapidly expanded. Recently, some theoretical absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) and safety challenges have been posed for the modality. Using these theoretical concerns as a framework, the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ Consortium) Protein Degrader Working Group (WG) conducted two surveys to benchmark current preclinical practices for TPDs. Conceptually, the safety assessment of TPDs is the same as for standard small molecules; however, the techniques used, assay conditions/study endpoints, and timing of assessments might need to be modified to address differences in mode of action of the class.

Current Approaches for Predicting Human PK for Small Molecule Development Candidates: Findings from the IQ Human PK Prediction Working Group Survey.

Accurate prediction of human clearance (CL) and volume of distribution at steady state (Vd,ss) for small molecule drug candidates is an essential component of assessing likely efficacious dose and clinical safety margins. In 2021, the IQ Consortium Human PK Prediction Working Group undertook a survey of IQ member companies to understand the current PK prediction methods being used to estimate these parameters across the pharmaceutical industry. The survey revealed a heterogeneity in approaches being used across the industry (e.g., the use of allometric approaches, differing incorporation of binding terms, and inconsistent use of empirical correction factors for in vitro-in vivo extrapolation, IVIVE), which could lead to different PK predictions with the same input data. Member companies expressed an interest in improving human PK predictions by identifying the most appropriate compound-class specific methods, as determined by physiochemical properties and knowledge of CL pathways. Furthermore, there was consensus that increased understanding of the uncertainty inherent to the compound class-dependent prediction would be invaluable in aiding communication of human PK and dose uncertainty at the time of candidate nomination for development. The human PK Prediction Working Group is utilizing these survey findings to help interrogate clinical IV datasets from across the IQ consortium member companies to understand PK prediction accuracy and uncertainty from preclinical datasets.