DAIR in treating chronic PJI after total knee arthroplasty using continuous local antibiotic perfusion therapy: a case series study.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial agents are administered via intramedullary antibiotic perfusion (iMAP)/intrasoft tissue antibiotic perfusion (iSAP) to infected lesions to control osteoarticular and soft tissue infections. Continuous local antibiotic perfusion (CLAP) has been reported to be useful. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of DAIR combined with CLAP for chronic PJI after total knee arthroplasty performed at our hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Six patients (male; one case, female; five cases, mean age 79.5 years (70-94)) underwent CLAP for chronic PJI after TKA at our hospital between July 2020 and June 2022. They were followable for at least one year after surgery. Seven months (17-219), with a mean follow-up of 24.3 months (12-36). In addition to direct debridement and insert exchange, systemic antimicrobial treatment, and CLAP with gentamicin were performed using NPWT. We investigated the organisms causing the inflammation, the duration of iMAP/iSAP implantation, the maximum daily dose of GM, the maximum GM blood concentration, and the presence or absence of GM-induced adverse events. RESULT: Two of six patients had a recurrence of infection at five weeks and five months after initial CLAP and required repeat CLAP treatment, but all patients could preserve their components. The organisms responsible for the flare-ups were MSSA in three cases: ESBL-producing E. coli, mixed MSSA and streptococcal infection, Klebsiella pneumonia in one case each, and unknown pathogens in one case. CLAP therapy for all patients was administered eight times in 6 cases: iMAP, mean: 10.0 days (5-16); iSAP, mean: 19.3 days (15-28); GM dose, mean: 162.5 mg/day (80-240); and GM blood concentration, mean: 1.4 µg/mL (0.2-5.0). Adverse events included one case of reversible acute kidney injury during CLAP in a patient with recurrent infection. DAIR with CLAP for chronic post-TKA infection can be a useful treatment option to preserve components and allow the infection to subside, provided the implant is not markedly loosened.

Outcomes After Successful Debridement, Antibiotic, and Implant Retention Therapy for Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Controversy surrounds debridement, antibiotic and implant retention (DAIR) for treatment of acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Data regarding DAIR's rate of infection resolution is variable with little investigation of functional outcomes. METHODS: We identified 191 DAIR cases at a single institution from 2008 to 2020. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-10 (PROMIS) scores were collected. Patient Reported Outcome Scores were obtained from 60 cases. Median follow-up (IQR) was 4.5 (2.1 to 7.6) versus 3.0 (1.2 to 5.3) years for the control group. Mean scores were compared to a cohort of uncomplicated total knee arthroplasties matched by age, body mass index, and sex using generalized linear models adjusted for follow-up duration. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves for PJI were constructed. RESULTS: Mean Patient Reported Outcome Scores for the DAIR cohort were 57.2 ± 19.7 for KOOS-JR, 41.6 ± 7.1 for PROMIS physical health (PH), and 46.6 ± 8.7 for PROMIS mental health (MH). Mean control group values were 65.8 ± 21.0 for KOOS-JR, 44.6 ± 8.4 for PROMIS PH, and 49.2 ± 9.2 for PROMIS MH. No difference was observed in KOOS-JR (P = .83) or PROMIS MH (P = .11). PROMIS PH was lower in the DAIR cohort compared to the control group (P = .048). Median follow-up (years) for all 191 cases was 5.9 (range, 0.5 to 13.1). Survivorship (years) without subsequent operation for infection was 84% at 1, 82% at 2, and 79% at 5. CONCLUSION: Knee and MH outcomes in successful DAIR procedures were similar to uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty. DAIR's success rate was 79% in treating acute PJI at 5 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Infection.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter study sought to further investigate the method and outcome of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for the management of unicompartmental knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). METHODS: This retrospective study was performed on 52 patients who underwent DAIR for PJI of a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) across 4 academic medical centers, all performed by fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons. Patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, infecting organism, operative data, antibiotic data, and success in infection control at 1 year were collected. RESULTS: The average time from index surgery to diagnosis of PJI was 11.1 weeks (range, 1.4 to 48). There was no correlation between time of diagnosis and success at 1 year (R = 0.09, P = .46). There was an association between surgical synovectomy and the eradication of infection (R = 0.28, P = .04). Overall, there was an 80.8% (42 of 52) infection-controlled success rate at 1 year from the DAIR procedure. All DAIR failures went on to require another procedure, either 1-stage (2 of 10) or 2-stage (8 of 10) revision to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Of the DAIR successes, 6 (14.3%) went on to require conversion to TKA for progression of arthritis within 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that DAIR is a safe and moderately effective procedure in the setting of acute PJI of UKA across institutions, with a success rate consistent with DAIR for TKA. The data suggest that a wide exposure and thorough synovectomy be incorporated during the DAIR UKA to improve the likelihood of successful eradication of PJI at the 1-year mark. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Experience Using Adjuvant Bacteriophage Therapy for the Treatment of 10 Recalcitrant Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Case Series.

Periprosthetic joint infections are a devastating complication of joint replacement surgery. One novel therapeutic that has potential to change the current treatment paradigm is bacteriophage therapy. Herein, we discuss our experiences with bacteriophage therapy for 10 recalcitrant periprosthetic joint infections and review the treatment protocols utilized to achieve successful outcomes.

Outcomes and risk factors for failure after débridement, antibiotics, and implant retention for elbow periprosthetic joint infection.

BACKGROUND: Evidence for the management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total elbow arthroplasty is sparse, particularly in regard to débridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR). This study explored the outcomes of DAIR and analyzed risk factors for failure. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients 18 years or older diagnosed with elbow PJI and managed with DAIR between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2018, at a single institution was performed. Twenty-six elbows met the inclusion criteria during the study period. All DAIR procedures included in this study represented an attempt to manage an acute PJI with surgical irrigation and débridement without removal of the elbow arthroplasty components, followed by long-term systemic antimicrobial therapy. DAIR failure was defined as recurrence of PJI, unplanned re-operation for infection, or death secondary to infection. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify possible risk factors for failure. RESULTS: DAIR failed in 17 cases of elbow PJI with a failure rate of 65% at 2 years (95% confidence interval: 41.3%-79.6%). The median time to failure from DAIR was 43 days (interquartile range: 27-114). We found that DAIR failed in all cases with sinus tracts or negative cultures. The group with favorable outcomes had a shorter median duration of symptoms (5 vs. 18 days, P = .65) and a higher proportion of monomicrobial infections (58.8% vs. 88.9%, P = .19) compared to those with unfavorable outcomes. However, with the numbers available, none of the possible risk factors analyzed for association with failure reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: DAIR for elbow PJI was associated with high rates of failure. Possible risk factors for failure may include the presence of sinus tract, longer duration of symptoms, and culture-negative infection. Although the relatively low morbidity of DAIR compared with total elbow arthroplasty implant resection for a one-stage or two-stage reimplantation is attractive, patients considered for DAIR must know that the chance of success is limited to approximately 35%.

Association of Acute Kidney Injury With Antibiotic Loaded Cement Used for Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) is commonly used in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) to increase the local concentration of antibiotic at the site of infection. Use of ALBC has been associated with rare instances of acute kidney injury (AKI) despite low systemic absorption of the nephrotoxic antibiotics; however, the incidence of AKI is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of and risk factors for AKI associated with ALBC. METHODS: This single-site, retrospective cohort study compared 162 PJI patients who underwent Stage 1 revision to a spacer with ALBC to 115 PJI patients who underwent debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) without the use of ALBC. Both groups received similar systemic antibiotics postoperatively. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regressions were used to analyze risk factors for AKI. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of AKI: 29 patients (17.9%) in the ALBC group and 17 (14.7%) in DAIR group developed AKI (odds ratio 1.43; 95% CI 0.70 to 2.93). There was a trend toward increased severity of AKI in the ALBC group. Chronic kidney disease, systemic vancomycin, and diuretic use were independent factors associated with the risk of AKI. CONCLUSION: An AKI occurred in 17% of PJI patients receiving either a spacer with ALBC or a DAIR. The use of ALBC was not associated with a significant increased risk of AKI. However, the use of systemic vancomycin and diuretic use were independent predictors of AKI in this patient population.

Irrigation and Debridement With Chronic Antibiotic Suppression for the Management of Acutely Infected Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasties.

BACKGROUND: Most data on irrigation and debridement with component retention (IDCR) as a treatment for acute periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) focuses on primary total joint arthroplasties (TJAs). However, the incidence of PJI is greater after revisions. We investigated the outcomes of IDCR with suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT) following aseptic revision TJAs. METHODS: Through our total joint registry, we identified 45 aseptic revision TJAs (33 hips, 12 knees) performed from 2000 to 2017 that were treated with IDCR for acute PJI. Acute hematogenous PJI was present in 56%. Sixty-four percent of PJIs involved Staphylococcus. All patients were treated with 4 to 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics with the intention to treat with SAT (89% received SAT). The mean age was 71 years (range, 41 to 90), with 49% being women and a mean body mass index of 30 (range, 16 to 60). The mean follow-up was 7 years (range, 2 to 15). RESULTS: The 5-year survivorships free from re-revision for infection and reoperation for infection were 80% and 70%, respectively. Of the 13 reoperations for infection, 46% involved the same species as the initial PJI. The 5-year survivorships free from any revision and any reoperation were 72% and 65%, respectively. The 5-year survivorship free from death was 65%. CONCLUSION: At 5 years following IDCR, 80% of implants were free from re-revision for infection. As the penalty for implant removal is often high in revision TJAs, IDCR with SAT is a viable option for acute infection after revision TJAs in select patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Treatment experience with continuous local antibiotic perfusion for periprosthetic joint infection.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic concentrations 100-1000 times higher than the minimum inhibitory concentration are necessary for eradicating biofilms in periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). Achieving this with intravenous antibiotics is challenging, but continuous local antibiotic perfusion (CLAP) can increase the local concentration of antibiotics. Although there are several reports on CLAP therapy in the fracture-related infection, there are only few reports on its application in PJI. Here, we report our experience with CLAP therapy for PJI. METHODS: Eight patients with PJI (two males and six females, with mean age of 73.5 years [±11.6]) were treated at our department, and their clinical characteristics were analyzed. The parameters considered were the classification of PJI, surgical procedure, duration of CLAP, duration of transvenous antibiotic administration, time of CRP-negative status, whether the infection resolved or recurred, and whether there were complications due to CLAP. RESULTS: Initial surgery included total knee arthroplasty in five cases, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in one case, and total hip arthroplasty in two cases. There were four cases of early postoperative infection, two of acute delayed infection, and two of chronic delayed infection. The surgical procedures performed were two-stage revision for two patients, and debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for the other six. The mean durations of CLAP and transvenous antibiotic administration were 8.5 (±2.4) and 22.4 days (±13.7), respectively, and the mean time to CRP-negative status was 23.3 days (±10.7). All eight patients successfully resolved without additional irrigation or debridement, and no recurrence was observed at the last follow-up after discontinuation of oral antibiotics. No systemic side effects of gentamicin or other complications associated with CLAP were observed. CONCLUSION: All patients achieved infection resolution with the combined use of CLAP. This suggests that CLAP is a useful treatment option for PJI.

Analyzing risk factors for treatment failure in fracture-related infection.

INTRODUCTION: Fracture-related infection (FRI) represents a challenging clinical scenario. Limited evidence exists regarding treatment failure after initial management of FRI. The objective of our investigation was to determine incidence and risk factors for treatment failure in FRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated for FRI between 2011 and 2015 at three level 1 trauma centers. One hundred and thirty-four patients treated for FRI were identified. Demographic and clinical variables were extracted from the medical record. Treatment failure was defined as the need for repeat debridement or surgical revision seven or more days after the presumed final procedure for infection treatment. Univariate comparisons were conducted between patients who experienced treatment failure and those who did not. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify independent associations with treatment failure. RESULTS: Of the 134 FRI patients, 51 (38.1%) experienced treatment failure. Patients who failed were more likely to have had an open injury (31% versus 17%; p = 0.05), to have undergone implant removal (p = 0.03), and additional index I&D procedures (3.3 versus 1.6; p < 0.001). Most culture results identified a single organism (62%), while 15% were culture negative. Treatment failure was more common in culture-negative infections (p = 0.08). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was the most common organism associated with treatment failure (29%; p = 0.08). Multivariate regression demonstrated a statistically significant association between treatment failure and two or more irrigation and debridement (I&D) procedures (OR 13.22, 95% CI 4.77-36.62, p < 0.001) and culture-negative infection (OR 4.74, 95% CI 1.26-17.83, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of treatment failure following FRI continues to be high. Important risk factors associated with treatment failure include open fracture, implant removal, and multiple I&D procedures. While MRSA remains common, culture-negative infection represents a novel risk factor for failure, suggesting aggressive treatment of clinically diagnosed cases remains critical even without positive culture data. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study; Level III.

Revision surgery for periprosthetic elbow infection: eradication rate, complications, and functional outcomes-a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the outcomes of revision surgery after periprosthetic elbow infection (PEI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen studies with 332 PEI that underwent revision surgery were included. Demographics, laboratory and microbiological data, types of implants, surgical techniques with complications and reoperations, eradication rates, and clinical and functional outcomes were reported. RESULTS: Staphylococcus aureus was the most common microorganism (40%). Pre-operatively, the mean white blood cell count was 8400 ± 4000 per microliter; the mean C-reactive protein level was 41.6 ± 66.9 mg/dl, and the mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 45 ± 66.9 mm/h. The Coonrad-Morrey total elbow prosthesis represented 41.2% of the infected implant, and it also represented the most common system used for the PEI revision surgery. Two-stage revision and debridement and implant retention (DAIR) were the most common procedures performed for PEI, and, on the whole, they represented 35.7 and 32.7%, respectively. The eradication rate was 76% with 2-stage, 71% with resection arthroplasty (RA), 66.7% with 1-stage, 57.7% with DAIR, and 40% with arthrodesis (EA). DAIR showed a significantly lower eradication rate than 2-stage (P = 0.003). The mean postoperative Mayo Elbow Performance Score was significantly higher in patients who underwent DAIR, and 2-stage compared with RA (P < 0.001 for all). Postoperative flexion-extension ROM was significantly higher in patients who underwent DAIR compared with 1-stage, 2-stage, and RA (P < 0.001 for all). Moreover, 1-stage and 2-stage showed a significantly greater postoperative flexion-extension ROM compared with RA (P < 0.001 for all). Reoperations occurred in 40% of patients after EA, 33.3% after 1-stage, 26.9% after DAIR and RA, and 24.1% after 2-stage. Conversion to amputation occurred in 2.2% of patients after RA and 1% after DAIR. CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage revision and DAIR are the most common procedures used to manage PEI; however, the former procedure showed a significantly higher eradication rate. Resection arthroplasty showed a high eradication rate, but postoperative lower clinical and functional outcomes limit the indications for this technique. One-stage procedure showed a limited role in the current practice of PEI treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

One-stage revision versus debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for acute prosthetic knee infection: an exploratory cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Studies have shown that debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is an effective procedure for acute infection of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to explore DAIR and one-stage revision for homogenous cohorts with acute postoperative and acute hematogenous infection of TKA, without compelling indications to perform a staged revision. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was an exploratory analysis that used retrospective data from Queensland Health, Australia, for DAIR and one-stage revision of TKA between June 2010 and May 2017 (3-year average follow-up). The re-revision burden, mortality rate, and the cost of the interventions were explored. Costs were expressed in 2020 Australian dollars. RESULTS: There were 15 (DAIR) and 142 (one-stage) patients with homogenous characteristics in the sample. The re-revision burden for DAIR was 20%, while for one-stage revision it was 12.68%. Two deaths were associated with a one-stage revision and no death was associated with DAIR. The total cost since the index revision of DAIR, $162,939, was higher than for one-stage revision $130,924 (p value = 0.501), due to higher re-revision burden. CONCLUSIONS: This study would suggest the use of one-stage revision over DAIR for acute postoperative and acute hematogenous infection of TKA. It suggests that there could be other potential criteria which have not been ascertained that need to be considered for optimal DAIR selection. The study indicates the need for more research and, of note, high-quality randomized controlled trials to provide a well-defined treatment protocol with high level of evidence to guide patient selection for DAIR.

A Comparison of Outcomes of Culture positive and Culture negative Acute Knee Prosthetic Joint Infection following Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR).

PURPOSE: We aim to compare the outcome of culture-positive (CP PJI) and culture-negative (CN PJI) acute knee prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) with polyethylene insert exchange. We also aim to analyze the factors associated with the successful outcome of DAIR and the influence of failed DAIR on the outcome of subsequent two-stage revision arthroplasty. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 36 consecutive patients who underwent DAIR for acute PJI between January 2013 and January 2018. The patient's demographic data, McPherson grade, surgical details, laboratory and microbiology data were retrieved from the medical records. All the patients have been followed up for a minimum of 3 years or until re-operation, revision or death and any complications, incidence of DAIR failure, revision and mortality were noted. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 4.9 ± 2.4 years. Among the 36 patients, 16 had CP PJI and 20 had CN PJI. Among the 16 patients with CP PJI, 8 patients had success with DAIR and 8 patients had a recurrence of infection (50%) at a mean of 21 months (range, 2 weeks to 55 months). Among the 20 patients with CN PJI, 14 patients had success with DAIR and 6 patients had a recurrence of infection [30% (6/20)] at a mean of 69 months (range, 13-221 months) (p < .05). The Kaplan-Meir survival analysis showed survivorship did not vary significantly between both groups (p > .05). Univariate regression analysis showed symptom duration of more than one month found to be significantly associated with the DAIR failure. There was no difference in failure rate after DAIR between age, Charlson comorbidity index, early postoperative versus acute hematogenous group and type of organism grown. Ten out of 14 DAIR failures were successfully managed with two-stage revision surgery with no recurrence of infection till the final follow-up. In the remaining 4 patients, one underwent re-debridement, two underwent arthrodesis and one was left with an antibiotic cement spacer. CONCLUSION: DAIR with polyethylene exchange will give comparable results irrespective of the culture positivity. Symptom duration of more than 30 days for DAIR is significantly associated with DAIR failure. DAIR failures can be successfully managed with two-stage revision.

Is There Harm in Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention Versus Two-Stage Revision in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Knee Infection? Experiences Within a Large US Health Care System.

BACKGROUND: When faced with a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty, the treating surgeon must determine whether 2-stage revision or "liner exchange," aka debridement, antibiotics, exchange of the modular polyethylene liner, and retention of fixed implants (DAIR), offers the best balance of infection eradication versus treatment morbidity. We sought to determine septic re-revision risk following DAIR compared to initial 2-stage revision. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study using data from Kaiser Permanente's total joint replacement registry. Primary total knee arthroplasty patients who went on to have a PJI treated by DAIR or 2-stage revision were included (2005-2018). Propensity score-weighted Cox regression was used to evaluate risk for septic re-revision. RESULTS: In total, 1,410 PJIs were included, 1,000 (70.9%) treated with DAIR. Applying propensity score weights, patients undergoing DAIR had a higher risk for septic re-revision compared to initial 2-stage procedures (hazard ratio 3.09, 95% CI 2.22-4.42). Of DAIR procedures, 150 failed (15%) and went on to subsequent 2-stage revision (DAIR-F). When compared to patients undergoing an initial 2-stage revision, we failed to observe a difference in septic re-revision risk following DAIR-F (hazard ratio 1.11, 95% CI 0.58-2.12). CONCLUSION: Although DAIR had a higher risk of septic re-revision, we failed to observe a difference in risk following DAIR-F when compared to those who initially underwent 2-stage revision. Functional outcome, patient, and organism factors are important to consider when discussing PJI management options. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Factors Associated With the Incidence and Timing of Total Knee Arthroplasty Infection.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty remains a challenging clinical problem. This study examined variables related to the incidence and timing of PJI. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 8462 primary total knee arthroplasties performed at our institution between 2006 and 2018 for PJI. The mean follow-up is 3.7 years. Eighty-seven variables including patient-reported diagnoses, demographics, and medications were collected. Time to infection, bacterial organism, success of infection treatment, and variables associated with infection are reported. RESULTS: PJI occurred in 105 (1.24%) cases. The incidence of infection in the first year was 0.72% and represented 58% of all infections. Multivariate Cox regression revealed males (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.85, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69-4.79) and patients with major depression or anxiety (HR = 2.11, 95% CI, 1.21-3.67) were more likely to develop an infection in the first year. After the first year, patients with a history of cellulitis (HR = 3.97, 95% CI, 1.91-8.27) and those taking antiepileptic medications (HR = 3.61, 95% CI, 1.73-7.52) were more likely to develop an infection. Culture-negative infections were more common after one year than before (23% vs 8%, P = .04). Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention was used in 79% (48/61) of infections in the first year and 55% (24/44) after one year with success rates of 51% and 70%, respectively (P = .16). CONCLUSION: The majority of infections occur during the first year after surgery. Importantly, patient variables associated with infection are different among infections that occur before and after one year. A multicenter study with a much larger number of infections may allow analysis of more time intervals after surgery.

Periprosthetic ankle infection: eradication rate, complications, and limb salvage. A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review investigated the outcomes of revision surgery after periprosthetic ankle infection (PAI). METHODS: According to the PRISMA statement, 9 studies with 131 PAIs surgically treated and analyzed were included. Demographics and surgical techniques with eradication rates and complications were reported. RESULTS: Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (30.4%) and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS) (26.5%) were the most common microorganisms. The eradication rate was 91.7% with permanent antibiotic spacers (SPC), 84.4% with 2-stage, 79.4% with arthrodesis (AA), and 58.8% with debridement and implant retention (DAIR). DAIR showed a significantly lower eradication rate than 2-stage (p = 0.016) and SPC (p = 0.043). Amputations occurred in 25% of patients after SPC, 8.8% after AA and 3.9% after DAIR. SPC showed a significantly higher amputation rate than DAIR and 2-stage (p = 0.044, and p = 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SPC and 2-stage revision show the highest eradication rates, but 2-stage has a lower risk of amputation.

Is debridement really the best we can do for periprosthetic joint infections following total ankle replacements? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ankle periprosthetic joint infections are rising in number, but an evidence-based gold standard treatment has not been defined yet. METHODS: We made a systematic review about the operative treatment of infections following total ankle arthroplasty. Proportional meta-analysis was used to summarize effects of the surgical techniques included. Primary outcome of this study was infection eradication, followed by complications, re-interventions, amputation rates and functions. RESULTS: We included six studies(113 patients) reporting 6 types of surgical interventions, mostly irrigation and debridement (35.4%) and two-stage revisions (24.8%). No differences among all analyzed techniques were found in the infection eradication outcome as well as in the secondary outcomes. Patients receiving a permanent spacer are most likely to end up with amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Literature dealing with infections after total ankle replacement is currently composed by few low-quality articles. The overlapping of confidence intervals related to all analyzed interventions showed no superiority of either technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR): An effective treatment option for early prosthetic joint infections.

INTRODUCTION: Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is an attractive treatment option for prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). However, reported success rates and predictors of DAIR failure vary widely. The primary aim of this study is to report the outcome of DAIR in patients with hip and knee PJIs receiving short course of antibiotic therapy. The secondary aim is to identify risk factors for DAIR failure. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of all hip and knee PJIs consecutively diagnosed at Quadrante Orthopedic Center, an Italian orthopedic hospital highly specialized in prosthetic surgery, from January 1, 2013 to January 1, 2019, and we analyzed those treated with DAIR. RESULTS: Forty-seven PJIs occurred after 5102 arthroplasty procedures. Twenty-one patients (45%) aged 71 years were treated with DAIR for hip (62%) and knee (38%) PJIs. These were classified as early PJIs in 76% cases, delayed in 19% and late in 5%. Median time from PJI-related symptoms onset to implant revision surgery was 12 days (IQR, 7-20 days). The median duration of antibiotic treatment after surgery was 63 days (IQR, 53-84 days). Sixteen (76%) patients were cured after a median follow-up of 2197 days (IQR, 815-2342 days), while 5 (24%) experienced failure. At multivariate analysis, delayed/late PJIs were significantly associated with failure (OR = 12.51; 95% CI 1.21-129.63, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: DAIR represents an effective strategy for the treatment of early PJIs in spite of short course of antibiotic therapy.

The role of fibrinogen in predicting reinfection after DAIR for periprosthetic joint infections.

BACKGROUND: Fibrinogen (FIB) has been found to be a promising marker in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), however, the value of FIB in predicting reinfection of PJI is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of FIB in predicting reinfection after debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for PJI. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients who were diagnosed with PJI and underwent DAIR from 2013 to 2019. The levels of the FIB, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured before DAIR. After DAIR, patients were followed and reinfections were identified. For both acute and chronic PJI, the predictive value of FIB was evaluated by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and was compared with traditional inflammatory markers including ESR and CRP. RESULTS: The expression of FIB differed between patients reinfected and those not reinfected in both acute and chronic PJI (p < 0.05). In patients who underwent DAIR for acute PJI, the sensitivity and specificity of FIB were 81.82 and 83.33%, respectively, which were significantly higher than that of CRP (sensitivity, 72.73%; specificity, 50%; p < 0.05), while the specificity was higher than that of ESR (specificity, 41.67%; p < 0.05). In patients who underwent DAIR for chronic PJI, the sensitivity and specificity of FIB were 80.00 and 66.66%, respectively, which were significantly higher than that of CRP (sensitivity, 53.33%; specificity, 66.66%; p < 0.05) and ESR (sensitivity was 66.00%; specificity, 16.66%; p < 0.05). The ROC curves showed that FIB demonstrated the highest AUC among the biomarkers in both acute and chronic PJI. CONCLUSION: FIB is a promising indicator in predicting reinfection after DAIR for both acute and chronic PJI, and it seems to perform better than ESR and CRP.

Comparison of the success rate after debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) for periprosthetic joint infection among patients with or without a sinus tract.

BACKGROUND: The relevance between the presence of a sinus tract and the failure risk after debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after hip or knee arthroplasty is still unclear. This study aimed to compare the success rate of DAIR between patients with or without a sinus tract and to explore the possible risk factors for failure after DAIR in patients with a sinus tract. METHODS: Consecutive DAIR cases for PJI after hip or knee arthroplasty between January 2009 and June 2019 with a minimum 1-year follow-up in two tertiary joint arthroplasty centers were included. Patients were classified into the sinus tract group and the non-sinus tract group according to the presence of a sinus tract. The success rate after DAIR were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Potential risk factors for failure in the sinus group were also explored. RESULTS: One hundred seven patients were included. At a median 4.4 years of follow-up, 19 of 52 (36.5%) cases failed in the sinus tract group, while 15 of 55 (27.3%) cases failed in the non-sinus tract group. The 1-year and 5-year cumulative success rates were 71.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 59.8-84.6%) and 56.8% (95% CI: 42.6-75.7%) in the sinus tract group, respectively, which were similar to the counterparts in the non-sinus tract group (P = 0.214). Among patients with a sinus tract, DAIR with the exchange of modular components showed a higher success rate (75.8% versus 47.4%, P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a sinus tract does not affect the success rate of DAIR. Modular component exchange in DAIR was proposed for patients with a sinus tract for an improved infection control rate.

Outcome of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention With Modular Component Exchange in Acute Culture-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

BACKGROUND: Modular component exchange and culture-directed antibiotic treatment is routinely employed for acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, as many as 7%-23% of PJIs have been reported to yield negative culture results. The efficacy of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) with modular component exchange in the setting of acute culture negative PJI remains largely unknown. The aim of our study is to evaluate the outcomes of DAIR with modular component exchange in acute culture-positive and culture-negative PJI. METHODS: A total of 149 consecutive patients with primary total joint replacements (90 total knee arthroplasties and 59 total hip arthroplasties) who underwent DAIR with modular component exchange for acute PJI with at least 3 years of follow-up were evaluated: (1) 46 culture-negative PJI patients and (2) 103 culture-positive PJI patients. Reinfection and aseptic revision rates along with complication rates were compared. RESULTS: The reinfection rate for DAIR in acute culture-negative PJI was 13.0% compared to 19.4% in culture-positive PJI (P = .48). Mean survival time from reinfection between culture-negative (7.7 ± 0.4 years) and culture-positive (7.4 ± 0.3 years) PJI groups did not differ significantly (P = .40). Aseptic revision rates were 8.7% and 4.9% (P = .46), respectively, with loosening being the primary reason for implant failure in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Despite lack of an identifying organism to guide postoperative antibiotic therapy, DAIR with modular component exchange for acute culture-negative PJI was associated with similar reinfection rates compared to acute culture-positive PJI, suggesting that culture negativity may not be a contraindication to DAIR in patients with acute PJI.