Deep PSA response and extended time-to-nadir as robust predictors of survival in Asian patients with de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer receiving upfront intensified treatment.

INTRODUCTION: In de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) treated with upfront intensification using androgen receptor signaling inhibitor or chemotherapy (Docetaxel), achieving a PSA nadir less than 0.2 ng/mL, indicative of superior survival in trials, may often be unattainable in real-world settings. We explored the predictive value of the degree of PSA decline and time to PSA nadir (TTPN) on oncological outcomes. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database of consecutive prostate cancer cases in Hong Kong was accessed. Patients diagnosed with de novo mHSPC from 2016 to 2022 and treated with upfront intensification were included in this analysis. Landmark analysis on PSA kinetics at 6-months following treatment intensification was performed. They were classified based on 1) TTPN (≥6 months vs. <6 months), and 2) a combined response (deep responders achieving both ≥95% PSA decline and TTPN ≥ 6 months vs. shallow responders). Multivariable regression analysis was employed to identify the effects of confounders. FINDINGS: A total of 131 patients were included in this analysis. Classifying patients by combined response best predicted survival outcomes. Deep responders had better progression-free survival (HR = 0.56; 95%CI = 0.34-0.91; p = 0.019), overall survival (HR = 0.50; 95%CI = 0.26-0.97; p = 0.036), and cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.43; 95%CI = 0.19-0.99; p = 0.042). Difference in overall survival remained significant after adjustment in multivariable regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Our analysis demonstrates that alternative PSA targets can predict treatment response and survival outcomes in de novo mHSPC patients in a real-world setting, providing valuable information for patient counselling and potentially guiding future trial design.

Real-world survival outcomes of adding docetaxel or abiraterone in patients with high-volume metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: historically controlled, propensity score matched comparison with androgen deprivation therapy.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the impact of treatment intensification with upfront docetaxel (DOC) or abiraterone (ABI) plus prednisolone on survival outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) by comparing it with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) monotherapy or combined androgen blockade (CAB) using propensity score matching (PSM). METHODS: Outcomes from 278 CHAARTED high-volume patients receiving upfront DOC (92 patients) or upfront ABI (186 patients) were compared to those from 354 patients receiving ADT or CAB. PSM was conducted to assess castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival (CRPCFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: After PSM, patient distributions between the three groups were well balanced. After 1:1 PSM, patients receiving upfront ABI had significantly better CRPCFS than those receiving ADT/CAB or upfront DOC [hazard ratio (HR) 0.39; 95% CI 0.27-0.56 vs. HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.30-0.82, respectively]. No significant difference in CRPCFS was observed between the upfront DOC and ADT/CAB groups (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.50-1.12). Patients receiving upfront DOC and upfront ABI had significantly better OS than those receiving ADT/CAB (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.0.30-0.98 vs. HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.29-0.84, respectively). However, no significant difference in OS was observed between upfront ABI and upfront DOC (hazard ratio 0.84; 95% CI 0.34-2.06). CONCLUSION: The comparison of real-world retrospective cohorts showed that treatment intensification with upfront DOC or upfront ABI promoted better OS compared to ADT alone or CAB in patients with high-volume mCSPC after PSM. However, no difference in OS was observed between upfront DOC and upfront ABI.

Efficacy and durability of multifactorial intervention on mortality and MACEs: a randomized clinical trial in type-2 diabetic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Multiple modifiable risk factors for late complications in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD), including hyperglycemia, hypertension and dyslipidemia, increase the risk of a poor outcome. DKD is associated with a very high cardiovascular risk, which requires simultaneous treatment of these risk factors by implementing an intensified multifactorial treatment approach. However, the efficacy of a multifactorial intervention on major fatal/non-fatal cardiovascular events (MACEs) in DKD patients has been poorly investigated. METHODS: Nephropathy in Diabetes type 2 (NID-2) study is a multicentre, cluster-randomized, open-label clinical trial enrolling 395 DKD patients with albuminuria, diabetic retinopathy (DR) and negative history of CV events in 14 Italian diabetology clinics. Centres were randomly assigned to either Standard-of-Care (SoC) (n = 188) or multifactorial intensive therapy (MT, n = 207) of main cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure < 130/80 mmHg, glycated haemoglobin < 7%, LDL, HDL and total cholesterol < 100 mg/dL, > 40/50 mg/dL for men/women and < 175 mg/dL, respectively). Primary endpoint was MACEs occurrence by end of follow-up phase. Secondary endpoints included single components of primary endpoint and all-cause death. RESULTS: At the end of intervention period (median 3.84 and 3.40 years in MT and SoC group, respectively), targets achievement was significantly higher in MT. During 13.0 years (IQR 12.4-13.3) of follow-up, 262 MACEs were recorded (116 in MT vs. 146 in SoC). The adjusted Cox shared-frailty model demonstrated 53% lower risk of MACEs in MT arm (adjusted HR 0.47, 95%CI 0.30-0.74, P = 0.001). Similarly, all-cause death risk was 47% lower (adjusted HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.29-0.93, P = 0.027). CONCLUSION: MT induces a remarkable benefit on the risk of MACEs and mortality in high-risk DKD patients. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00535925. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00535925.

Efficacy of temporally intensified exposure for anxiety disorders: A multicenter randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The need to optimize exposure treatments for anxiety disorders may be addressed by temporally intensified exposure sessions. Effects on symptom reduction and public health benefits should be examined across different anxiety disorders with comorbid conditions. METHODS: This multicenter randomized controlled trial compared two variants of prediction error-based exposure therapy (PeEx) in various anxiety disorders (both 12 sessions + 2 booster sessions, 100 min/session): temporally intensified exposure (PeEx-I) with exposure sessions condensed to 2 weeks (n = 358) and standard nonintensified exposure (PeEx-S) with weekly exposure sessions (n = 368). Primary outcomes were anxiety symptoms (pre, post, and 6-months follow-up). Secondary outcomes were global severity (across sessions), quality of life, disability days, and comorbid depression. RESULTS: Both treatments resulted in substantial improvements at post (PeEx-I: dwithin = 1.50, PeEx-S: dwithin = 1.78) and follow-up (PeEx-I: dwithin = 2.34; PeEx-S: dwithin = 2.03). Both groups showed formally equivalent symptom reduction at post and follow-up. However, time until response during treatment was 32% shorter in PeEx-I (median = 68 days) than PeEx-S (108 days; TRPeEx-I = 0.68). Interestingly, drop-out rates were lower during intensified exposure. PeEx-I was also superior in reducing disability days and improving quality of life at follow-up without increasing relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Both treatment variants focusing on the transdiagnostic exposure-based violation of threat beliefs were effective in reducing symptom severity and disability in severe anxiety disorders. Temporally intensified exposure resulted in faster treatment response with substantial public health benefits and lower drop-out during the exposure phase, without higher relapse. Clinicians can expect better or at least comparable outcomes when delivering exposure in a temporally intensified manner.

Radiotherapy alone as a possible de-intensified treatment for human papillomavirus-related locally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is defined by p16 positivity and/or HPV DNA positivity. Because survival of patients with HPV-related OPSCC after chemoradiotherapy is favorable, a de-intensified treatment is expected to lead to less morbidity while maintaining low mortality. The association of tumor p16 and HPV DNA status with survival after radiotherapy alone remains unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively examined survival of 107 patients with locally advanced OPSCC after radiotherapy alone (n = 43) or chemoradiotherapy (n = 64) with respect to tumor p16 and HPV DNA status, using Cox's proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Survival after radiotherapy alone was significantly worse in p16-positive/HPV DNA-negative locally advanced OPSCC than in p16-positive/HPV DNA-positive locally advanced OPSCC. In bivariable analyses that included T category, N category, TNM stage, and smoking history, the survival disadvantage of p16-positive/HPV DNA-negative locally advanced OPSCC remained significant. There was no significant difference in survival after chemoradiotherapy between p16-positive/HPV DNA-positive locally advanced OPSCC and p16-positive/HPV DNA-negative locally advanced OPSCC. Survival in p16-positive/HPV DNA-positive locally advanced OPSCC after radiotherapy alone was similar to that after chemoradiotherapy, which stayed unchanged in bivariable analyses after adjustment of every other covariable. Survival of p16-negative/HPV DNA-negative locally advanced OPSCC was poor irrespective of treatment modality. CONCLUSIONS: Survival in p16-positive locally advanced OPSCC differs depending on HPV DNA status. Radiotherapy alone can serve as a de-intensified treatment for p16-positive/HPV DNA-positive locally advanced OPSCC, but not for p16-positive/HPV DNA-negative locally advanced OPSCC.

Health and Productivity Benefits with Early Intensified Treatment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Results from Korea.

The available evidence suggests positive health outcomes associated with early treatment intensification in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Our study estimated the productivity effects arising from improved health correlated with early intensified treatment in T2DM in Korea. Using a recently published methodology and model, we investigated the association between early intensified treatment and the probability of experiencing fewer diabetes-related complication events. Treatment strategies leading to better health outcomes are expected to be associated with social value through increased participation in paid and unpaid work activities. Therefore, we translated the lower incidence of complications into monetary terms related to productivity for the Korean population. We quantified productivity by considering (a) absenteeism, (b) presenteeism, (c) permanent loss of labor force, and (d) activity restriction. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses in the base case parameter were performed. Approximately, 1.7 thousand (standard deviation [SD] ±580 events) micro- and macrovascular complication events could potentially be avoided by early treatment intensification. This led to a societal gain attributed to increased productivity of 23 million USD (SD ± $8.2 million). This article demonstrates the likelihood of achieving better health and productivity through early intensified treatment in diabetes.

The societal impact of early intensified treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Aim: The current study estimates the societal impact of early intensified treatment compared with initial monotherapy with subsequent treatment intensification in newly diagnosed adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Mexico. Methods: An individual patient-level simulation and a static cohort model were employed to simulate the treatment pathway and the probability of experiencing complications of diabetes. The avoided number of events was translated into avoided productivity losses, which were monetized using wages. Results: Patients on early intensified treatment experienced approximately 13,000 fewer complication events over 10 years. This was translated into a societal impact of $54 million (USD). Conclusion: Early treatment intensification is likely to be of particular benefit to health outcomes and productivity losses.

Effect of Prolonged Exposure, intensified Prolonged Exposure and STAIR+Prolonged Exposure in patients with PTSD related to childhood abuse: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: It is unclear whether the evidence-based treatments for PTSD are as effective in patients with CA-PTSD. Objective: We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of three variants of prolonged exposure therapy. Method: We recruited adults with CA-PTSD. Participants were randomly assigned to Prolonged Exposure (PE; 16 sessions in 16 weeks), intensified Prolonged Exposure (iPE; 12 sessions in 4 weeks followed by 2 booster sessions) or a phase-based treatment, in which 8 sessions of PE were preceded by 8 sessions of Skills Training in Affective and Interpersonal Regulation (STAIR+PE; 16 sessions in 16 weeks). Assessments took place in week 0 (baseline), week 4, week 8, week 16 (post-treatment) and at a 6-and 12-month follow-up. The primary outcome was clinician-rated PTSD symptom severity. Results: We randomly assigned 149 patients to PE (48), iPE (51) or STAIR+PE (50). All treatments resulted in large improvements in clinician assessed and self-reported PTSD symptoms from baseline to 1-year follow-up (Cohen's d > 1.6), with no significant differences among treatments. iPE led to faster initial symptom reduction than PE for self-report PTSD symptoms (t135 = -2.85, p = .005, d = .49) but not clinician-assessed symptoms (t135 = -1.65, p = .10) and faster initial symptom reduction than STAIR+PE for self-reported (t135 = -4.11, p < .001, d = .71) and clinician-assessed symptoms (t135 = -2.77, p = .006, Cohen's d = .48) STAIR+PE did not result in significantly more improvement from baseline to 1-year follow-up on the secondary outcome emotion regulation, interpersonal problems and self-esteem compared to PE and iPE. Dropout rates did not differ significantly between conditions. Conclusions: Variants of exposure therapy are tolerated well and lead to large improvements in patients with CA-PTSD. Intensifying treatment may lead to faster improvement but not to overall better outcomes. The trial is registered at the clinical trial registry, number NCT03194113, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03194113.

Antecedentes: No está claro si los tratamientos basados en la evidencia para el TEPT son tan efectivos en pacientes con TEPT relacionado con abuso infantil (TEPT-AI).Objetivo: Nuestro objetivo fue investigar la efectividad de tres variantes de la terapia de exposición prolongada.Método: Reclutamos adultos con TEPT-AI. Los participantes fueron asignados aleatoriamente a Exposición Prolongada (EP; 16 sesiones en 16 semanas), Exposición Prolongada intensificada (EPi; 12 sesiones en 4 semanas seguidas de dos sesiones de refuerzo) o un tratamiento basado en fases, en el que 8 sesiones de EP fueron precedidas por 8 sesiones de Entrenamiento de Habilidades en Regulación Afectiva e Interpersonal (STAIR+EP; 16 sesiones en 16 semanas). Las evaluaciones se llevaron a cabo en la semana 0 (línea de base), semana 4, semana 8, semana 16 (postratamiento) y en un seguimiento de 6 y 12 meses. El resultado primario fue la gravedad de los síntomas de TEPT calificada por el médico.Resultados: Asignamos aleatoriamente 149 pacientes a EP (48), EPi (51) o STAIR+EP (50). Todos los tratamientos dieron como resultado grandes mejoras en los síntomas de TEPT evaluados por el médico y autoinformados, desde el inicio hasta el seguimiento de 1 año (d de Cohen > 1.6), sin diferencias significativas entre los tratamientos. La EPi condujo a una reducción más rápida de los síntomas iniciales que la EP para los síntomas de TEPT autoinformados (t135 = −2.85, p =.005, d =.49) pero no los síntomas evaluados por el médico (t135 = −1.65, p =.10) y una reducción más rápida de síntomas iniciales que STAIR+EP para los síntomas autoinformados (t135 = −4.11, p <.001, d =.71) y evaluados por el médico (t135 = −2.77, p =.006, d de Cohen =.48) STAIR+EP no dio como resultado una mejora significativamente mayor desde el inicio hasta el seguimiento de 1 año en los resultados secundarios de regulación emocional, problemas interpersonales y autoestima en comparación con la EP y la EPi. Las tasas de abandono no difirieron significativamente entre las condiciones.Conclusiones: Las variantes de la terapia de exposición se toleran bien y conducen a grandes mejoras en pacientes con TEPT-AI. La intensificación del tratamiento puede conducir a una mejora más rápida, pero no a mejores resultados en general.

Preoperative predictors of pathological tumour stage and prognosis may be used when selecting candidates for intensified treatment in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Intensified treatment such as extended lymph node dissection (LND) and/or perioperative chemotherapy in addition to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) has been suggested for high-risk cases of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We aimed to identify preoperative predictors of tumour stage and prognosis in the diagnostic work-up before RNU. Further to evaluate if our findings could be used in selecting patients for intensified treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 179 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at Haukeland University Hospital (HUS) and Vestfold Hospital Trust (VHT) during 2005-2017 were included in this retrospective study. All relevant preoperative variables regarding the patient, the CT and the ureteroscopy (URS) were registered and analysed regarding their ability to predict non-organ confined disease (NOCD, pT3+ and/or N+) at final pathology after RNU. The prognosis was assessed calculating survival for the cohort and stratified by preoperative variables. RESULTS: Local invasion and pathological lymph nodes at CT predicted NOCD in uni and multivariate regression analyses (OR 3.36, p=.004 and OR 6.21, p=.03, respectively). Reactive oedema surrounding the tumour (OR 2.55, p=.02), tumour size (4.8 vs. 3.9 cm, p=.006) and high-grade tumour at URS biopsy (OR 3.59, p=.04) predicted NOCD at univariate regression analyses. The 5-year CSS and OS for the entire cohort was 79% and 60%. ECOG, local invasion, pathological lymph nodes and reactive oedema surrounding the tumour at CT predicted CSS. CONCLUSIONS: Several variables at the CT predicted both stage and survival. Local invasion at CT seems the most promising feature for selecting patients for intensified treatment.

Effects of Atrial Fibrillation on Heart Failure Outcomes and NT-proBNP Levels in the GUIDE-IT Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effects of atrial fibrillation (AF) on cardiac biomarkers and outcomes in a trial population of patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction treated with optimal guideline-directed medical therapy. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of 894 patients in the Guiding Evidence-Based Therapy Using Biomarker-Intensified Treatment in Heart Failure (GUIDE-IT) trial (January 2013-July 2016). Patients were stratified by AF status and compared with regard to guideline-directed medical therapy use, longitudinal levels of N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and outcomes including HF hospitalization and mortality. RESULTS: After adjustment, AF was associated with a significant increase in the risk of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death (hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.61; P=0.04) and HF hospitalization (hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.68; P=.03) but with no difference in mortality during a median 15 months of follow-up. There were no significant differences in medication treatment between those with and those without AF. At 90 days, a higher proportion of patients with AF (89.4% vs 81.5%; P=.002) had an NT-proBNP level above 1000 pg/mL (to convert NT-proBNP values to pmol/L, multiply by 0.1182), and AF patients had higher NT-proBNP levels at all time points through 2 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Among patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction, prevalent AF was associated with higher NT-proBNP concentrations through 2 years of follow-up and higher risk for HF hospitalization despite no substantial differences in medical therapy.

Transoral robotic surgery in head and neck district: a retrospective study on 67 patients treated in a single center.

BACKGROUND: The anatomical complexity of the oropharynx and the difficulty in reaching its distal portion have always conditioned the surgical accessibility.Robotic surgery represents an excellent alternative in the treatment of cervico-facial oncological diseases. METHODS: This series comprises all patients managed for head and neck cancer by Trans Oral Robotic Surgery TORS.The staging assessment, including neck ultrasound and total body PET/CT scan, was performed in each patient according to the TNM classification.All charts were recorded with the following data: name and surname, age, gender, date of surgery intra or post-operative hemorragia, tumor site, histology, TNM stage, robot set-up time, tumor resection time, whether or not tracheotomy was performed, whether or not neck dissection was performed, insertion of a nasogastric tube or gastrostomy, time to resumption of oral feeding, surgical margins, mean length of hospital stay, adjuvant treatment and follow-up. RESULTS: From February 2013 to February 2018, TORS was performed in 67 consecutive patients affected by head and neck tumours.We divided, our sample, in 3 subsites: supraglottic larynx, parapharyngeal space and oropharynx.Pathology reports confimed malignancy in 44 cases: 8 cases lymphomas, 36 cases of Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 5 cases of benign salivary glands tumors and 18 miscellaneous cases. Neck dissection was performed in 12 cases.Tracheotomy was perfomed in 3/67 cases for respiratory failures. A nasogastric tube was inserted at the end of the surgical procedure in 21 patients. The mean length of hospital stay was 10 days .Major complications included post-operative bleeding in 3 patients, 1 exitus for massive bleeding 20 days post-surgery and 1 respiratory failure treated with tracheotomy and monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for 3 days. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic surgery has been considered a valid alternative to traditional open treatment in many specializations with the advantages of an endoscopic procedure, with the same oncological and functional results and with fewer complications. The advantages of this type of surgical technique have been discussed, it is mandatory to focus on the indications and contraindications.