CA-125 elimination rate constant K (KELIM) as a promising predictor of complete cytoreduction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer patients: a retrospective study from two Chinese hospitals.

BACKGROUND: The modeled CA-125 elimination constant K (KELIM) is a potential marker of tumor chemosensitivity in ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before interval surgery. The objective of this study was to externally validate the KELIM (rate of elimination of CA-125) score in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) undergoing NACT and explore its relation to the completeness of IDS and survival. METHODS: The study was based on a retrospective cohort of 133 patients treated for advanced HGSC, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages III-IV, with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, folllowed by interval surgery, in two centres in China. CA-125 concentrations at baseline and during neoadjuvant chemotherapy were collected. We used standardized (std) KELIM for subsequent analysis. Clinicopathologic parameters were collected, and Kaplan‒Meier survival analyses were performed for PFS and OS. RESULTS: KELIM was an independent predictor of the probability of complete surgery and survival in our cohort. The median std KELIM score of patients with complete surgery was significantly higher than that of patients with incomplete IDS (1.20 vs. 0.71, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that a std KELIM score ≥0.925 was an independent predictive factor for achieving complete resection (OR = 5.480; 95% CI, 2.409-12.466, P < 0.001) and better PFS (HR = 0.544; 95% CI: 0.349-0.849, P = 0.007) and OS (HR = 0.484; 95% CI: 0.251-0.930, P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: The tumor-primary tumor chemosensitivity, assessed by the modeled CA-125 KELIM, calculated during NACT, is a major parameter to consider for decision-making regarding IDS attempts and predicting patient survival.

Trends in specific procedures performed at the time of cytoreduction for ovarian cancer: Is interval debulking surgery truly less radical? A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Team Ovary study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate procedures performed during primary debulking surgery (PDS) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) for ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients surgically treated at our institution for newly diagnosed stage IIIC/IV epithelial ovarian cancer between 6/1/2015-12/31/2021 were identified using a prospectively collected database. Patients were triaged to PDS or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by IDS using an institutional algorithm. Data on specific procedures performed, including consultants called, were collected from operative and pathology reports. Appropriate statistical analyses were applied. RESULTS: Overall, 467 patients underwent PDS and 434 underwent IDS; 76% (PDS) and 71% (IDS) of cases achieved complete gross resection. Comparing PDS vs IDS cohorts, median age was 63 years (range, 23-86) vs 67 years (range, 35-95), 79% vs 86% of patients had high-grade serous histology, and 38% vs 70% had stage IV disease. Most procedures (except ostomy, distal pancreatectomy) were more common during PDS (P < .05). Bowel surgery was performed during 65% of PDS and 33% of IDS, and upper abdominal surgery during 72% of PDS and 52% of IDS; both were more common during PDS (P < .001). Estimated blood loss (median, 500 mL [PDS] vs 300 mL [IDS]) and operative time (median, 362 min [PDS] vs 267 min [IDS]) were higher for PDS (P < .001). A consulting surgeon was utilized during 31% of PDS and 18% of IDS, with hepatopancreaticobiliary as the most commonly called service (61% and 65%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In our study of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer, while most procedures were more often performed during PDS, NACT did not obviate the need for radical surgical resection. Thus, advanced surgical skills remain essential.

Efficacy and safety of minimally invasive surgery versus open laparotomy for epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and conventional abdominal surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), stratified by treatment type. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by an Expert Panel of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology Ovarian Cancer Committee. Several academic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, and Ichushi were searched by the Japan Medical Library Association on November 11, 2023, using the keywords "epithelial ovarian cancer", "minimally invasive surgery", "laparoscopic", and "robot-assisted". Articles describing MIS treatment for EOC compared with conventional abdominal surgery were independently assessed by two authors. The primary outcomes were survival and perioperative adverse events. RESULTS: After screening 1114 studies, 35 articles were identified, including primary staging surgery (PSS) for early-stage EOC EOC (n = 20) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy following interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS; n = 10) and upfront primary debulking surgery (PDS; n = 5) for advanced-stage EOC. These studies included 29,888 patients (7661 undergoing MIS and 22,227 undergoing abdominal surgery). Patients receiving MIS and abdominal surgery had similar overall survival (PSS: odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-1.37; NACT-IDS: OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.25-3.44 and PDS: OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.36-1.22, all P > 0.05). MIS showed perioperative complication rates comparable to those of abdominal surgery (intraoperative and postoperative, all treatment types P ≥ 0.05). However, the rate of lymph node dissection in early-stage EOC (PSS: OR 0.49, 95%CI0.26-0.91) and multivisceral resections in advanced-stage EOC (NACT-IDS: OR 0.27 95%CI 0.16-0.44 and PDS: OR 0.27, 95%CI 0.16-0.44) was lower in MIS than in abdominal surgery (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: MIS did not negatively impact the survival and perioperative complications of patients with EOC compared to abdominal surgery. While MIS is a viable option, varied case selection and surgical procedures suggest potential bias, requiring further validation studies.

Prognostic value of HE4 in advanced-stage, high-grade serous ovarian cancer: Analysis of HE4 kinetics during NACT, predicting surgical outcome and recurrence in comparison to CA125.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prognostic value of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) kinetics during and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) cycles compared with cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), in predicting the surgical outcomes of interval debulking surgery (IDS) in patients with advanced-stage, high-grade serous ovarian cancer. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Severance Hospital in Seoul, South Korea and involved 123 women with high-grade serous epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who were diagnosed between April 2015 and July 2020. Three outcomes were considered: the chemotherapy response score (CRS) by omentum, residual disease after IDS, and recurrence. Other clinical, imaging, and biological parameters at baseline, during NACT cycles, and pre- and postoperative time were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: We observed a substantial and gradual decrease in both CA-125 level (median from 1612 to 85.55 U/mL; p < 0.001) and HE4 level (514.7 to 87.7 pmol/L; p < 0.001) during NACT cycles, while pre-to-postoperative reduction was only significant for HE4 (median from 77.3 to 62.0 pmol/L (p < 0.001)). Of the total patients, 4.1% showed no response to NACT (chemoresistance) and 65.9% had a partial response. Residual disease was observed in 55 (44.7%) patients. Recurrence occurred in 90 patients (73.2%), with a median progression-free survival of 15.28 months. The percent reduction in CA-125 level- but not HE4 - during NACT was significantly associated with CRS (by omentum); the reduction in CA-125 during NACT cycles was higher when the CRS was found to be 3 and 2 (median = 96.4 [IQR = 8.3] and 93.7 [12.2] respectively) compared to score 1 (68.3 [34.1]), and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.004). However, no significant association was observed between the percent reduction in CA-125 or HE4 levels during NACT and residual disease or recurrence. The normalization of HE4 - but not CA-125 - before surgery was predictive for surgery outcome; that is, an abnormal preop HE4 level was associated with a residual disease risk ratio of 2.72 (95% CI = 1.27-5.79). CONCLUSION: Monitoring HE4 or CA-125 levels has low prognostic value in patients with advanced-stage, high-grade serous ovarian cancer who are treated with NACT followed by IDS. However, the preoperative level of the HE4 biomarker may be useful in identifying patients at higher risk for suboptimal cytoreductive surgery or who may require more extensive surgery. Further prospective studies are warranted to explore the prognostic utility of eventual combinations of clinical, radiological, and biological parameters, notably by using artificial intelligence-based models.

The Putative Effects of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on the Immune System of Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma.

The epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) is one of leading causes of cancer-related mortality in females. For some patients, complete resection cannot be achieved, thus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) following interval debulking surgery (IDS) could be an alternative choice. In general-held belief, cytotoxic chemotherapy is assumed to be immunosuppressive, because of its toxicity to dividing cells in the bone marrow and peripheral lymphoid tissues. However, increasing evidence highlighted that the anticancer activity of chemotherapy may also be related to its ability to act as an immune modulator. NACT not only changed the morphology of cancer cells, but also changed the transcriptomic and genomic profile of EOC, induced proliferation of cancer stem-like cells, gene mutation, and tumor-related adaptive immune response. This review will provide a comprehensive overview of recent studies evaluating the impact of NACT on cancer cells and immune system of advanced EOC and their relationship to clinical outcome. This information could help us understand the change of immune system during NACT, which might provide new strategies in future investigation of immuno-therapy for maintenance treatment of EOC.

Clinical characteristics and treatment modalities in women with newly diagnosed advanced high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to investigate the demographics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes of patients newly diagnosed with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) in 3 medical centers in Taiwan before the integration of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from patients diagnosed with HGSOC between January 2014 and December 2018 and followed-up for a minimum of 12 months after diagnosis. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data, while survival rates were evaluated using the Kaplan‒Meier method. RESULTS: There were 251 patients included in the analysis, and 98.8% received platinum plus paclitaxel chemotherapy (PPCT). Primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) were performed in 78.9% and 17.1% of patients, respectively. The percentage of optimal surgery was higher in the IDS cohort than in the PCS cohort (83.8% vs. 53.6%). Bevacizumab was used as initiation therapy in 16.7% of patients, and maintenance therapy was administered in 6.8%. Advanced age, IDS, and suboptimal surgery were independent poor prognostic factors associated with lower overall survival (OS). Patients with optimal surgery had significantly lower OS and progression-free survival in the IDS cohort than in the PCS cohort. The predictive accuracy was good for OS at the 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Advanced age, IDS, and residual disease are associated with poor OS in patients with HGSOC. Compared to PCS, IDS provides a higher likelihood of optimal surgery but results in a lower probability of survival for patients with HGSOC in Taiwan.

Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for low-grade serous ovarian cancer in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) use for low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) and to quantify associations between NACT and extent of cytoreductive surgery. METHODS: We identified women treated for stage III or IV serous ovarian cancer in a Commission on Cancer accredited program between January 2004-December 2020. Regression models were developed to evaluate trends in NACT use for LGSOC, to identify factors associated with receipt of NACT, and to quantify associations between NACT and bowel or urinary resection at the time of surgery. Demographic and clinical factors were used for confounder control. RESULTS: We observed 3350 patients who received treatment for LGSOC during the study period. The proportion of patients who received NACT increased from 9.5% in 2004 to 25.9% in 2020, corresponding to an annual percent change of 7.2% (95% CI 5.6-8.9). Increasing age (rate ratio (RR) 1.15; 95% CI 1.07-1.24), and stage IV disease (RR 2.66; 95% CI 2.31-3.07) were associated with a higher likelihood of receiving NACT. For patients with high-grade disease, NACT was associated with a decrease in likelihood of bowel or urinary surgery (35.3% versus 23.9%; RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.65-0.71). For LGSOC, NACT was associated with a higher likelihood of these procedures (26.6% versus 32.2%; RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.08-1.42). CONCLUSION: NACT use among patients with LGSOC has increased from 2004 to 2020. While NACT was associated with a lower rate of gastrointestinal and urinary surgery among patients with high-grade disease, patients with LGSOC receiving NACT were more likely to undergo these procedures.

Minimally invasive interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: Assess outcomes of interval debulking surgery (IDS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy via minimally invasive surgery (MIS) compared with laparotomy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer between 2013 and 2018 who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and IDS were identified in the National Cancer Database. Primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were 5-year survival, 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality, extent of surgery, residual disease, hospitalization duration, surgical conversions, and unplanned readmissions. Propensity score matching was used to compare MIS and laparotomy for IDS. Association of treatment approach with overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. Sensitivity analysis was conducted for effect of unmeasured confounders. RESULTS: A total of 7897 patients met inclusion criteria; 2021 (25.6%) underwent MIS. Percentage undergoing MIS increased from 20.3%-29.0% over the study period. After propensity score matching, median overall survival was 46.7 months in the MIS group versus 41.0 months in the laparotomy group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.86 (95%CI 0.79-0.94)]. Five-year survival probability was higher in MIS versus laparotomy (38.3% vs 34.8%, p < 0.01). There was lower 30- and 90-day mortality (0.3% vs 0.7% [p = 0.04] and 1.4% vs 2.5% [p = 0.01], respectively), shorter length of stay (median 3 vs 5 days, p < 0.01), lower residual disease (23.9% vs 26.7%, p < 0.01), and lower additional cytoreductive procedures (59.3% vs 70.8%, p < 0.01) in MIS compared to laparotomy, with similar rates of unplanned readmission (2.7% vs 3.1%, p = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo IDS by MIS have similar overall survival and decreased morbidity compared with laparotomy.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without nintedanib for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: Lessons from the GINECO double-blind randomized phase II CHIVA trial.

AIM: The oral anti-angiogenic therapy nintedanib prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) when combined with chemotherapy after primary surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The randomized phase II CHIVA trial evaluated the impact of combining nintedanib with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed unresectable FIGO stage IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer received 3-4 cycles of carboplatin plus paclitaxel every 3 weeks as NACT before interval debulking surgery (IDS), followed by 2-3 post-operative cycles. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either nintedanib 200 mg twice daily or placebo on days 2-21 every 3 weeks during NACT (omitting peri-operative cycles), and then as maintenance therapy for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint was PFS. RESULTS: Between January 2013 and May 2015, 188 patients were randomized (124 to nintedanib, 64 to placebo). PFS was significantly inferior with nintedanib (median 14.4 versus 16.8 months with placebo; hazard ratio 1.50, p = 0.02). Overall survival (OS) was also inferior (median 37.7 versus 44.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio 1.54, p = 0.054). Nintedanib was associated with increased toxicity (grade 3/4 adverse events: 92% versus 69%, predominantly hematologic and gastrointestinal), lower response rate by RECIST (35% versus 56% before IDS), and lower IDS feasibility (58% versus 77%) versus placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Adding nintedanib to chemotherapy and in maintenance as part of NACT for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer cannot be recommended as it increases toxicity and compromises chemotherapy efficacy (IDS, PFS, OS). CLINICALTRIALS: govregistration: NCT01583322.

Leave it in the past - primary treatment modality for high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer is not associated with secondary cytoreduction outcomes: A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Team Ovary study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes of patients with high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who underwent secondary cytoreduction surgery (SCS) after up-front treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) versus primary debulking surgery (PDS). METHODS: Patients with high-grade EOC who underwent SCS from 2/1/2004-10/31/2021 were classified by up-front treatment. Clinical and treatment characteristics were compared between cohorts. Progression-free survival (PFS2) and overall survival (OS2) following SCS were compared using a Cox model adjusted for stage, age at SCS, and number of years between end of chemotherapy and SCS. RESULTS: Of 374 patients, 62 (17%) underwent NACT-IDS and 312 (83%) PDS. Justification for NACT was disease extent (n = 57, 92%), comorbidities (n = 3, 5%), and thromboembolism (n = 2, 3%). The NACT-IDS cohort had a higher median age at SCS (64 years [IQR: 56-70] vs 59 years [IQR: 53-66]; P = .03), higher proportion of stage III/IV disease (100% vs 81%; P < .001), and shorter median interval between end of chemotherapy and SCS (1.5 years [IQR: 1.1-2.3] vs 1.9 years [IQR: 1.3-3.1]; P = .01). Achievement of complete gross resection at SCS did not differ between NACT-IDS and PDS (84% vs 88%; P = .18). PFS2 (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.83-1.71) and OS2 (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.57-1.63) did not vary by primary treatment modality after adjusting for clinically relevant covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Despite more extensive disease at presentation, patients with high-grade EOC who recur after NACT-IDS seem to have similar surgical and survival outcomes after SCS compared to patients who recur after PDS, suggesting that prior NACT-IDS should not preclude SCS.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: GOTIC-019 study.

INTRODUCTION: Three randomized controlled trials have resulted in extremely extensive application of the strategy of using neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in Japan. This study aimed to evaluate the status and effectiveness of treatment strategies using NAC followed by IDS in Japanese clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multi-institutional observational study of 940 women with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer treated at one of nine centers between 2010 and 2015. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between 486 propensity-score matched participants who underwent NAC followed by IDS and primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Patients with FIGO stage IIIC receiving NAC had a shorter OS (median OS: 48.1 vs. 68.2 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.82, p = 0.06) but not PFS (median PFS: 19.7 vs. 19.4 months, HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.80-1.31, p = 0.88). However, patients with FIGO stage IV receiving NAC and PDS had comparable PFS (median PFS: 16.6 vs. 14.7 months, HR: 1.07 95% CI: 0.74-1.53, p = 0.73) and OS (median PFS: 45.2 vs. 35.7 months, HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.65-1.47, p = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: NAC followed by IDS did not improve survival. In patients with FIGO stage IIIC, NAC may be associated with a shorter OS.

Clinical implications of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer: a multi-center retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The mainstay of endometrial cancer treatment is surgical resection of tumors and postoperative adjuvant treatment is recommended if necessary. However, there is no consensus on the management of unresectable metastatic endometrial cancer. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (NAC-IDS) in unresectable, metastatic endometrial cancer. METHODS: From the endometrial cancer cohorts of four institutions in Korea, we identified patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IIIC-IVB endometrial cancer who received NAC-IDS between January 2008 and December 2020. Through a medical record review, we collected patients' clinicopathological data. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the factors affecting survival outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 32 patients were included with endometrioid (n = 18), serous (n = 5), carcinosarcoma (n = 6), and other histological types (n = 3). Among them, 28 (87.5%) patients had stage IVB disease. The most common neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimen was paclitaxel-carboplatin (n = 25, 78.1%), which was administered for a median of six cycles. While 26 (81.3%) patients showed an objective response, two (6.3%) progressed despite NAC. At the time of interval debulking surgery (IDS), 23 (71.9%) patients achieved complete cytoreduction. During 31.0 months of the median follow-up, there were 23 recurrences and 11 deaths, corresponding to a median PFS of 19.7 months and a 3-year OS rate of 69.7%. In multivariate analyses, non-endometrioid histology and residual tumor after IDS were identified as independent poor prognostic factors for PFS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 7.322; P < 0.001 and 5.934; P = 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis for OS could not be conducted because of the small number of events, although non-endometrioid histology was the only factor associated with worse OS in univariate analysis (adjusted HR, 4.523; P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: NAC-IDS may be a treatment option for unresectable metastatic endometrial cancer. Tumor histology and the possibility of complete cytoreduction are the primary considerations for NAC-IDS.

The impact of secondary cytoreductive surgery in platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer treated with upfront neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of the present study were to assess the oncological outcomes of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients undergoing secondary cytoreduction (SCS) after treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) at diagnosis and to compare the performance of different selection models in these patients. METHODS: Retrospective, observational, single-center cohort study including patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer with abdominal/inguinal/cardiophrenic disease between November 2012 and November 2020. Patients were selected as surgical candidates with PET/CT-scan and with diagnostic laparoscopy. RESULTS: 272 patients were included in the study. Of these, 165 (60.7%) patients were treated with PDS at diagnosis and 107 (39.3%) with IDS. SCS was performed in 178 (65.4%) cases, with complete gross resection achieved in 155/178 (87.1%). No progression-free survival (PFS) difference was demonstrated when patients treated with PDS were compared with those treated with NACT+IDS at first diagnosis (median 21 versus 21 months; p = 0.684); no post-recurrence survival (PRS) difference was evident between the two groups (median 81 versus 77 months, respectively; p = 0.574). Current selection models to candidate patients to SCS adequately performed in patients treated with IDS at diagnosis, as well as in the PDS group, with combination of PET/CT-scan and laparoscopy being an accurate tool in prediction of no gross residual disease at SCS in this pre-selected population. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer treated with NACT/IDS as primary treatment have similar post-recurrence survival outcomes of those treated with PDS. Current models to select patients for SCS can be safely applied to IDS patients.

Incidence, treatment, and survival trends in older versus younger women with epithelial ovarian cancer from 2005 to 2018: A nationwide Danish study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine clinical trends in Denmark for younger and older epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients, focusing on incidence, treatment, and survival changes. METHODS: We included a nationwide cohort diagnosed with EOC from 2005 to 2018. We described age-standardized incidence, surgical patterns, residual disease trends, and cancer-specific survival stratified by age (<70 and ≥ 70 years), stage, and period (2005-09, 2010-13, 2014-18). RESULTS: We included 7522 patients. The incidence decreased from 16.3 (2005) to 11.4 (2018) per 100,000 woman-years, driven by the younger cohort. While the proportion of patients with stage IIIC-IV disease undergoing primary debulking surgery (PDS) decreased, the proportion of patients having interval debulking surgery (IDS) and no debulking surgery increased significantly. In 2014-18, 36% and 24% had PDS for younger and older patients, respectively, compared to 72% and 62% in 2005-09. In both age cohorts, the proportion of patients debulked to no residual disease increased significantly among patients with stage IIIC-IV and in the total cohort. Two-year cancer-specific survival increased from 75% (2005-09) to 84% (2014-18) for younger patients and from 53% to 66% for older patients. After adjusting for potential confounders, age ≥ 70 was associated with a 1.4-fold increased risk of cancer-specific death (95% confidence interval: 1.2,1.5). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients with advanced EOC not undergoing PDS or IDS increased significantly. During the same period, patients debulked to no residual disease, and cancer-specific survival increased. However, a survival gap in favor of the younger patients remains after adjusting for potential confounders.

Primary or Interval Debulking Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: a Personalized Decision-a Literature Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Summarize the writings published in the last 5 years on the management of surgery in the first line of treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: For patients with a significant tumor burden, the neoadjuvant chemotherapy therapy (NACT) with interval debulking surgery (IDS) strategy shows comparable efficacy than primary debulking surgery (PDS) in terms of survival in randomized studies with less morbidity. Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer generates more than half cases a recurrence. First-line treatment is based on a chemotherapy regimen combining a platinum-based and a taxane-based, associated with surgery. This review considers papers of last 5 years of timing, thinking tools, and innovation in the management. The choice of strategy, PDS or IDS, would be a personalized recommendation. The challenge is to adapt the timing of the surgery to the patient's characteristics and that of her disease.

Prolongation of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy before Surgery: Seeking the Optimal Number of Cycles in Serous Ovarian Cancer.

AIM: The optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) cycles is unclear in epithelial ovarian cancer. Our study aimed to evaluate the effect of the number of NACT cycles before interval debulking surgery on survival. METHODS: Data of 221 patients with advanced-stage serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into groups as who received 3 cycles of NACT (group A), 4-5 cycles of NACT (group B), and 6 cycles of NACT (group C). RESULTS: There were 67 (30%) patients in group A, 70 (32%) in group B, and 84 (38%) in group C. Median overall survival (OS) was 61 (range 43-79) months for group A, 44 (range 36-52) months for group B, and 39 (range 27-50) months for group C. In addition, median disease-free survival (DFS) was 23.1 (range 8.5-32.1) months for group A, 19.2 (range 10.1-28.4) months for group B, and 21.5 (range 16-27) months for group C. Patients receiving >3 NACT cycles had worse OS than patients who received 3 NACT cycles (for group A vs. B, p = 0.018; for group A vs. C, p = 0.049). However, in terms of DFS, patients receiving 3 NACT cycles had no statistically significant difference compared to patients who received >3 NACT cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with advanced-stage serous EOC who received more than 3 cycles of NACT had poor OS. However, there was no statistical difference in terms of DFS. In addition, >3 cycles of NACT did not increase the probability of achieving complete cytoreduction at the time of surgery.

Survival and Surgical Approach among Women with Advanced Ovarian Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of surgical approach on overall survival (OS) for women with advanced, epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and determine the sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with surgical approach. DESIGN: The primary exposure was surgical approach to interval cytoreduction, minimally invasive versus open, and was evaluated by intention to treat. Primary outcome was OS. Associations were examined using Chi-squared tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, and multivariate logistic regression. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards. SETTING: The National Cander Database was used to identify eligible patients. PATIENTS: Women diagnosed with stage IIIC/IV EOC from 2010-2016. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were included if they were treated with NACT within 90 days of diagnosis before interval cytoreductive surgery (CRS). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 8085 women were identified; 6713 (83%) underwent open interval CRS, and 1372 (17%) underwent minimally invasive interval CRS. The proportion undergoing minimally invasive CRS after NACT increased from 2% in 2010 to 11% in 2016, a nearly 6-fold increase. There was no difference in OS between women who underwent minimally invasive and open interval CRS (median OS 36.5 vs 35.2 months, HR 0.94, 95% CI, 0.86-1.04). After adjusting for demographic and clinical variables, including age, race, ethnicity, income, and Charlson/Deyo score, no difference in OS was observed (HR 0.95, 95% CI, 0.86-1.04). Women of older age (OR 1.35, 95% CI, 1.05-1.74) and Hispanic ethnicity (OR 1.46, 95% CI, 1.14-1.88) had increased odds of receiving minimally invasive CRS after NACT, whereas low income (<$38000/year) women had decreased odds (OR 0.76, 95% CI, 0.60-0.97, p = .03). Length of stay differed for patients undergoing minimally invasive versus open interval CRS (3 vs 5 days, p <.01), but there was no difference in need for postoperative readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive CRS has similar survival outcomes to open CRS among women with EOC who have undergone NACT.

Management of advanced ovarian cancer in Leicester: The benefits of a paradigm shift in surgical approach.

AIM: Surgery for advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) has evolved over the past decade to ingeminate the need to offer maximum effort surgery (MES). The aim of this study is to analyze the implementation of a paradigm shift in the surgical management of women with AOC at the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (UHL) in 2015, until 2020, compared to 2011-2014. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of women with AOC who underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in the UHL. The two groups were: 153 women from January 2011 to December 2014 (group 1), 136 women from January 2015 to January 2020 (group 2). RESULTS: In group 1, the 1, 3, and 5 years overall survival rates (OS) were, 90.4%, 33.7%, and 19.3%, compared to 90.2%, 55.4%, and 29.7%, respectively, in group 2 (p = 0.012). Significantly more women had CRS in group 2: 45-Primary debulking surgery (PDS) and 57-interval debulking surgery (IDS) versus 17-PDS & 67-IDS in group 1 (p < 0.001). Surgical complexity score (modified Aletti score) was higher in group 2 compared to group 1 (p = <0.001). No significant difference was noted in the postoperative complications, in group 2, in women who underwent PDS versus IDS, yet PDS was associated with higher OS. CONCLUSIONS: MES/CRS in women with AOC significantly improves OS. Our data highlights the importance of a dedicated team to implement this change in cancer centers. Where possible, suitable women with AOC likely to have complete cytoreduction based on preoperative assessment, should be offered PDS.

Dense hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with cisplatin in patients with stage III serous epithelial ovarian cancer: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the efficacy and safety of interval debulking surgery (IDS) combined with dense hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with cisplatin in Chinese patients with FIGO stage III serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: This retrospective single-center study reviewed the demographic and clinical data of 197 patients with primary FIGO stage III serous EOC who were treated with IDS with (n = 121) or without (n = 76, control group) dense HIPEC between January 2012 and April 2017. The co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was the occurrence of adverse events. RESULTS: The median PFS was 24 months in the IDS plus dense HIPEC group, whereas it was 19 months in the IDS alone group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33-0.65, p = 0.000). The median OS in patients treated with IDS plus dense HIPEC (51 months) was significantly longer than that in patients treated with IDS alone (40 months, HR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.35-0.78, p = 0.001). The demographic and preoperative clinical characteristics of these two groups were comparable (p > 0.05). In the IDS alone group, no adverse events were recorded in 42 (55.3%) of the 76 patients, and 14 (18.4%) patients were reported to have grade III/IV adverse events. In the IDS plus dense HIPEC group, no adverse events were recorded in 55 (45.5%) of the 121 patients, and 23 (19.0%) patients were reported to have grade III/IV adverse events. No postoperative deaths occurred within 30 days in either group and neither did severe fatal complications in the IDS plus dense HIPEC group. CONCLUSIONS: IDS plus dense HIPEC with cisplatin in Chinese patients with FIGO stage III serous EOC is associated with improved survival and is reasonably well tolerated by patients.

Assessing feasibility and perioperative outcomes with minimally invasive surgery compared with laparotomy for interval debulking surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine peri-operative outcomes in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) undergoing interval debulking surgery (IDS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) via minimally invasive interval debulking surgery (MIS) or laparotomy (LAP). METHODS: A single institution, retrospective cohort study was performed in women with EOC who underwent IDS with HIPEC from 2017 to 2019 via MIS or LAP. Peri-operative outcomes were compared using univariate analysis. RESULTS: In total, 50 eligible women were identified; ten (20.0%) underwent MIS + HIPEC and 40 (80.0%) LAP + HIPEC. The median age of patients in the MIS group was 71.1 vs. 64.2 years in LAP (p = 0.031). There was no significant difference in pre-operative complete radiographic response following NACT (p = 0.18). Notably, there was no difference in the rate of R0 resection (70.0% vs. 77.5%; p = 0.39). There was no significant difference in ICU admission, estimated blood loss, operative time, or use of vasopressors between the cohorts. Similarly, there was no difference in 30-day adverse events for MIS vs. LAP, but length of stay was decreased for those who underwent minimally invasive procedures (3 vs. 4 days, p = 0.016). Time to initiation of chemotherapy following surgery was not significantly different between groups (26.2 days vs 32.0 days, p = 0.090). With median follow-up of 15.1 months, there was no difference in recurrence free survival (median 15.0 vs 17.2 months log-rank, p = 0.30) for MIS vs. LAP. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective cohort study, we demonstrate that in women with advanced EOC, HIPEC with MIS at the time of IDS following NACT is feasible. Our institutional experience demonstrates similar rates of R0 cytoreduction, compared to LAP. An MIS approach should not prevent surgeons from utilizing HIPEC where indicated for management of advanced EOC.