Prediction of outcome using CD14++CD16-, CD14++CD16+ and CD14+CD16++ monocyte subpopulations in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections.

There is still no study investigating the prognostic performance of CD14++CD16-, CD14++CD16+ and CD14+CD16++ monocyte subpopulations in complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs); therefore, we aimed to evaluate the association between monocyte subtypes and outcome in such patients. A single-center prospective study was conducted at a University Hospital Stara Zagora between November 2018 and August 2021. Preoperatively and on the 3rd postoperative day (POD), we measured the levels of CD14++CD16-, CD14++CD16+ and CD14+CD16++ monocytes in peripheral blood using flow cytometry in 62 patients with cIAIs and 31 healthy controls. Nine of the 62 patients died during hospitalization. Survivors had higher pre-surgery percentages of CD14++CD16- classical monocytes and higher percentage of these cells predicted favorable outcome in ROC analysis (AUROC = 0.781, p = 0.008). The CD14++CD16+ intermediate monocyte percentages were higher in non-survivors both pre- and postoperatively but only the higher preoperative values predicted a lethal outcome (AUROC = 0.722, p = 0.035). For CD14+CD16++ non-classical monocytes, non-survivors had lower percentages on day 3 post-surgery and low percentage was predictive of lethal outcome (AUROC = 0.752, p = 0.046). Perioperative levels of monocyte subpopulations in peripheral blood show a great potential for prognostication of outcome in patients with cIAIs.

Characterization of Mortality by Sepsis Source in Patients Admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of infectious source on sepsis outcomes for surgical patients is unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between sepsis sources and cumulative 90-d mortality in patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) with sepsis. METHODS: All patients admitted to the SICU at an academic institution who met sepsis criteria (2014-2019, n = 1296) were retrospectively reviewed. Classification of source was accomplished through a chart review and included respiratory (RT, n = 144), intra-abdominal (IA, n = 859), skin and soft tissue (SST, n = 215), and urologic (UR, n = 78). Demographics, comorbidities, and clinical presentation were compared. Outcomes included 90-d mortality, respiratory and renal failure, length of stay, and discharge disposition. Cox-proportional regression was used to model predictors of mortality; P < 0.05 was significant. RESULTS: Patients with SST were younger, more likely to be diabetic and obese, but had the lowest total comorbidities. Median admission sequential organ failure assessment scores were highest for IA and STT and lowest in urologic infections. Cumulative 90-d mortality was highest for IA and RT (35% and 33%, respectively) and lowest for SST (20%) and UR (8%) (P < 0.005). Compared to the other categories, UR infections had the lowest SICU length of stay and the highest discharge-to-home (57%, P < 0.0005). Urologic infections remained an independent negative predictor of 90-d mortality (odds ratio 0.14, 95% confidence interval: 0.1-0.4), after controlling for sequential organ failure assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Urologic infections remained an independent negative predictor of 90-d mortality when compared to other sources of sepsis. Characterization of sepsis source revealed distinct populations and clinical courses, highlighting the importance of understanding different sepsis phenotypes.

Prognostic performance of neutrophil CD64 expression in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections - a prospective study.

No study yet analyzed the prognostic abilities of neutrophil CD64 expression (nCD64) in complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), therefore our aim was to evaluate the possible association between this biomarker and outcome in such patients. This single-center prospective study was conducted in the Department of Surgical Diseases at a University Hospital 'Prof. Dr. Stoyan Kirkovich' Stara Zagora for the period November 2018 - August 2021. We used flow cytometry to measure the percentage of nCD64 preoperatively and on the 3rd postoperative day (POD) in 62 patients with cIAIs and 31 healthy controls. Of the 62 enrolled patients, nine (14.5%) died during hospitalization. The perioperative expression of nCD64 was significantly higher in non-survivors compared to survivors (p = 0.02 before surgery and p = 0.024 after surgery). ROC Curve analysis revealed the good prognostic value of pre- and postoperative nCD64 levels as mortality predictors (AUROC = 0.744 and 0.765, respectively). Preoperatively, the identified sensitivity and specificity for nCD64 cut-off = 94.8% were 66.7% and 84.6%, respectively and on the 3rd POD for nCD64 cut-off = 84.85% we observed a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 78.8%. Neutrophil CD64 shows good prognostic value in patients with cIAIs both preoperatively and on the 3rd POD.

Chi-square automatic interaction detector decision tree analysis model: Predicting cefmetazole response in intra-abdominal infection.

BACKGROUND: Cefmetazole is used as the first-line treatment for intra-abdominal infections. However, only a few studies have investigated the risk factors for cefmetazole treatment failure. AIMS: This study aimed to develop a decision tree-based predictive model to assess the effectiveness of cefmetazole in initial intra-abdominal infection treatment to improve the clinical treatment strategies. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients who were unexpectedly hospitalized due to intra-abdominal infections between 2003 and 2020 and initially treated with cefmetazole. The primary outcome was clinical intra-abdominal infection improvement. The chi-square automatic interaction detector decision tree analysis was used to create a predictive model for clinical improvement after cefmetazole treatment. RESULTS: Among 2,194 patients, 1,807 (82.4%) showed clinical improvement post-treatment; their mean age was 48.7 (standard deviation: 18.8) years, and 1,213 (55.3%) patients were men. The intra-abdomせinal infections were appendicitis (n = 1,186, 54.1%), diverticulitis (n = 334, 15.2%), and pancreatitis (n = 285, 13.0%). The chi-square automatic interaction detector decision tree analysis identified the intra-abdominal infection type, C-reactive protein level, heart rate, and body temperature as predictive factors by categorizing patients into seven groups. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.68-0.73). CONCLUSION: This predictive model is easily understandable visually and may be applied in clinical practice.

Procalcitonin as an Early Predictor of Intra-abdominal Infections Following Gastric Cancer Resection.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of postoperative procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) for their ability to detect Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) in patients after GC surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective gastrectomy for primary GC were retrospectively enrolled between October 2018 and October 2019. The PCT and CRP levels and white blood cell (WBC) count were measured before surgery and on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, 5, and 7. The differences in serum PCT, CRP, and WBC levels between IAIs and non-IAIs groups were compared. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified independent clinical factors that predicted postoperative IAIs. RESULTS: A total of 155 patients who underwent GC surgery were enrolled. IAIs were observed in 12 patients (7.74%). The postoperative CRP and PCT values in the IAI group were higher than those in the non-IAI group. PCT had superior diagnostic accuracy on POD 3 (area under the curve 0.769) with an optimal cutoff value of 2.03 ng/mL, yielding 75% sensitivity, 87.4% specificity, and 97.6% negative predictive value. Multivariate analysis identified a PCT level of 2.03 mg/mL or greater on POD 3 as a significant predictive factor for IAIs after gastrectomy (odds ratio: 21.447, 95% confidence interval: 5.081-91.672). CONCLUSIONS: PCT values less than 2.03 ng/mL on POD 3 is an excellent negative predictor of IAIs, which may ensure a safe early discharge after gastric cancer surgery.

Antibiotic-resistant microorganisms in patients with bloodstream infection of intraabdominal origin: risk factors and impact on mortality.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of resistance patterns is essential to choose empirical treatment. We aimed to determine the risk factors for antibiotic-resistant microorganisms (ARM) in intraabdominal infections (IAI) and their impact on mortality. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients with bacteremia from IAI origin in a single hospital between January 2006 and July 2017. RESULTS: A total of 1485 episodes were recorded, including 381 (25.6%) due to ARM. Independent predictors of ARM were cirrhosis (OR 2; [95% CI 1.15-3.48]), immunosuppression (OR 1.49; 1.12-1.97), prior ceftazidime exposure (OR 3.7; 1.14-11.9), number of prior antibiotics (OR 2.33; 1.61-3.35 for 1 antibiotic), biliary manipulation (OR 1.53; 1.02-2.96), hospital-acquisition (OR 2.77; 1.89-4) and shock (OR 1.48; 1.07-2). Mortality rate of the whole cohort was 11.1%. Age (OR 1.03; 1.01-1.04), cirrhosis (OR 2.32; 1.07-4.38), urinary catheter (OR 1.99; 1.17-3.38), ultimately (OR 2.28; 1.47-3.51) or rapidly (OR 13.3; 7.12-24.9) fatal underlying disease, nosocomial infection (OR 2.76; 1.6-4.75), peritonitis (OR 1.95, 1.1-3.45), absence of fever (OR 2.17; 1.25-3.77), shock (OR 5.96; 3.89-9.13), and an ARM in non-biliary infections (OR 2.14; 1.19-3.83) were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Source control (OR 0.24; 0.13-0.44) and 2015-2017 period (OR 0.29; 0.14-0.6) were protective. CONCLUSION: Biliary manipulation and septic shock are predictors of ARM. The presence of an ARM from a non-biliary focus is a poor-prognosis indicator. Source control continues to be of paramount importance.

Intra-abdominal infections among adult intestinal and multivisceral transplant recipients in the 2-year post-operative period.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal and multivisceral transplantations are treatment options for patients with intestinal failure. Transplantation is often complicated by abdominal and/or bloodstream infections in the post-operative period. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all adults who underwent intestinal or multivisceral transplantation at our institution from 2003 to 2015 was performed. Data were collected for 2 years post transplant. RESULTS: A total of 106 intestinal or multivisceral transplants were performed in 103 patients. The median age at the time of transplant was 44 (IQR: 34-52) with 55% (n = 58) male and 45% (n = 48) female. There were 46 (43%) intra-abdominal infections post transplant among the 103 patients, and six transplant recipients (13%) developed concurrent bloodstream infections. The median time to first intra-abdominal infection was 23 days (IQR: 10-48). For those with organisms isolated in culture, forty-seven percent of the isolates were gram negative, 39% gram positive, 7% anaerobes, and 7% yeast. The most common isolates were enterococci at 28%, E. coli at 14%, and Klebsiella spp at 13%. Sixty-three percent of the enterococci were vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and 22% of the gram-negative isolates were extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs). Patients with intra-abdominal infections had longer hospital post-transplant length of stays at a median of 35 days (IQR: 25-48) vs 23 days (IQR: 17-33) for those without infections, P = .0012. There was no difference in all-cause mortality in patients with or without intra-abdominal infections, P = .654. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-abdominal infections are common in intestinal or multivisceral transplant recipients, but despite this complication, we found no increased risk of mortality. These transplant recipients are also at risk for infection with drug-resistant organisms.

Prognostic impact of postoperative intra-abdominal infections after elective colorectal cancer resection on survival and local recurrence: a propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: Several authors have reported an association between anastomotic leak and/or intra-abdominal abscess and oncological survival and recurrence. However, no reports have investigated whether combining anastomotic leak/intra-abdominal abscess and positive drainage culture influences long-term oncological outcomes. Therefore, we defined these complications as postoperative intra-abdominal infections. The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of postoperative intra-abdominal infections on long-term oncological outcomes after curative stage I-III colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 755 consecutive patients with stage I-III colorectal cancer undergoing curative surgery between 2010 and 2015 by performing a propensity score-matched analysis to reduce selection bias. RESULTS: Of the 755 patients, 62 were matched for postoperative intra-abdominal infections analyses. The median follow-up was 48 months. Compared with the non-infections group, the postoperative intra-abdominal infections group had a significantly shorter local recurrence-free survival (P = 0.01 prior to matching, and P = 0.05 after matching). No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of overall, cancer-specific free, recurrence-free, or distant recurrence-free survival. However, multivariate analyses identified postoperative intra-abdominal infections as an independent prognostic factor for local recurrence-free survival (P = 0.04 prior to matching, and P = 0.03 after matching). CONCLUSIONS: In this matched-pair analysis comparing stage I-III colorectal cancer patients with and without postoperative intra-abdominal infections, postoperative intra-abdominal infections were associated with poor local recurrence-free survival, but not overall, cancer-specific free, recurrence-free, or distant recurrence-free survival.

A combination of C-reactive protein and quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score has better prognostic accuracy than qSOFA alone in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections.

INTRODUCTION: Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) remain a serious challenge because of their unacceptably high mortality rates. Among different prognostic scoring systems quick-sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score is the most recent. However, as mortality predictor in surgical patients, qSOFA showed lack of sensitivity. The aim of this study was to find prognostic superiority of our new qSOFA-CRP score in patients with cIAIs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 78 patients presented to ED and admitted to Department of Surgical Diseases between January 2017 and October 2018 with diagnosis cIAIs. CRP levels, qSOFA score and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) were established at admission. We analyzed area under receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curves of SIRS, qSOFA and qSOFA-CRP and performed a comparison to explore their prognostic values. RESULTS: The identified in-hospital mortality was 25.6%. qSOFA-CRP score showed the best prognostic performance compared to qSOFA alone (AUROC = 0.818 vs. 0.746, p = .0219) and SIRS (AUROC = 0.818 vs. 0.579, p = .0009). The new qSOFA-CRP score ≥2 points showed excellent specificity (91.4%) and the highest sensitivity in comparison to qSOFA ≥2 and SIRS ≥2 (60% vs. 35% vs. 40%) for mortality prediction. CONCLUSIONS: qSOFA-CRP score showed better prognostic value than quick-SOFA alone in patients with cIAIs.

Eravacycline, a newly approved fluorocycline.

Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) are commonly associated with multimicroorganisms and treatment choices are becoming narrower due to developing resistance, especially in the gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae species. Eravacycline is a newly developed, fully synthetic tetracycline derivative that has shown potent broad-spectrum activity against a wide variety of microorganisms, including those such as extended spectrum ß-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter. Eravacycline has shown activity against many gram-positive organisms such as methicillin-resistant S. aureus and vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium (VRE), gram-negative organisms such as Escherichia coli, and anaerobic species of microorganisms such as Bacteroides. This fluorocycline has been compared to ertapenem and meropenem for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections and levofloxacin for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections. Eravacycline was shown to be noninferior to ertapenem but did not meet noninferiority criteria in comparison to levofloxacin. Oral and IV formulations on eravacycline were tested in clinical trials, but at this time, only the IV formulation is FDA approved. Eravacycline has been noted to have a half-life of 20 h with protein binding around 80%; AUC over minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) has also been shown to be eravacycline's best predictor of efficacy. Of note, eravacycline does not require any renal dose adjustments, as the majority of its clearance is by nonrenal pathways.

New antimicrobial options for the management of complicated intra-abdominal infections.

Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) are a common cause of morbidity and mortality in surgical patients. Optimal management of cIAI requires early source control in combination with adequate antimicrobial treatment and aggressive fluid resuscitation. cIAIs are mainly caused by Gram-negative bacilli and anaerobes. Broad-spectrum single-agent or combination drug regimens against these microorganisms are the mainstay of therapy. However, development of antimicrobial resistance has become an increasingly large concern: multidrug-resistant organisms are associated with a higher rate of inadequate antimicrobial therapy, which in turn is associated with higher mortality rate, longer hospital stay, and increased cost compared to adequate antimicrobial therapy. In this mini-review, we discuss the effectiveness of several new antimicrobial agents, recently approved or in advanced phases of clinical development, for the treatment of cIAIs, including the new beta-lactam and beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, aztreonam/avibactam), siderophore cephalosporins (cefiderocol), aminoglycosides (plazomicin), and tetracyclines (eravacycline).

Intra-abdominal infections: the role of different classifications on the selection of the best antibiotic treatment.

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) represent a most frequent gastrointestinal emergency and serious cause of morbimortality. A full classification, including all facets of IAIs, does not exist. Two classifications are used to subdivide IAIs: uncomplicated or complicated, considering infection extent; and community-acquired, healthcare-associated or hospital-acquired, regarding the place of acquisition. Adequacy of initial empirical antibiotic therapy prescribed is an essential need. Inadequate antibiotic therapy is associated with treatment failure and increased mortality. This study was designed to determine accuracy of different classifications of IAIs to identify infections by pathogens sensitive to current treatment guidelines helping the selection of the best antibiotic therapy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study including all adult patients discharged from hospital with a diagnosis of IAI between 1st of January and 31st of October, 2016. All variables potentially associated with pre-defined outcomes: infection by a pathogen sensitive to non-pseudomonal cephalosporin or ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole (ATB 1, primary outcome), sensitive to piperacillin-tazobactam (ATB 2) and hospital mortality (secondary outcomes) were studied through logistic regression. Accuracy of the models was assessed by area under receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve and calibration was tested using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. RESULTS: Of 1804 patients screened 154 met inclusion criteria. Sensitivity to ATB 1 was independently associated with male gender (adjusted OR = 2.612) and previous invasive procedures in the last year (adjusted OR = 0.424) (AUROC curve = 0,65). Sensitivity to ATB 2 was independently associated with liver disease (adjusted OR = 3.580) and post-operative infections (adjusted OR = 2.944) (AUROC curve = 0.604). Hospital mortality was independently associated with age ≥ 70 (adjusted OR = 4.677), solid tumour (adjusted OR = 3.127) and sensitivity to non-pseudomonal cephalosporin or ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole (adjusted OR = 0.368). The accuracy of pre-existing classifications to identify infection by a pathogen sensitive to ATB 1 was 0.59 considering place of acquisition, 0.61 infection extent and 0.57 local of infection, for ATB 2 it was 0.66, 0.50 and 0.57, respectively. CONCLUSION: None of existing classifications had a good discriminating power to identify IAIs caused by pathogens sensitive to current antibiotic treatment recommendations. A new classification, including patients' individual characteristics like those included in the current model, might have a higher potential to distinguish IAIs by resistant pathogens allowing a better choice of empiric antibiotic therapy.

The 2018 Lebanese Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Guidelines for the use of antimicrobial therapy in complicated intra-abdominal infections in the era of antimicrobial resistance.

BACKGROUND: The Lebanese Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (LSIDCM) is involved in antimicrobial stewardship. In an attempt at guiding clinicians across Lebanon in regards to the proper use of antimicrobial agents, members of this society are in the process of preparing national guidelines for common infectious diseases, among which are the guidelines for empiric and targeted antimicrobial therapy of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI). The aims of these guidelines are optimizing patient care based on evidence-based literature and local antimicrobial susceptibility data, together with limiting the inappropriate use of antimicrobials thus decreasing the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and curtailing on other adverse outcomes. METHODS: Recommendations in these guidelines are adapted from other international guidelines but modeled based on locally derived susceptibility data and on the availability of pharmaceutical and other resources. RESULTS: These guidelines propose antimicrobial therapy of cIAI in adults based on risk factors, site of acquisition of infection, and clinical severity of illness. We recommend using antibiotic therapy targeting third-generation cephalosporin (3GC)-resistant gram negative organisms, with carbapenem sparing as much as possible, for community-acquired infections when the following risk factors exist: prior (within 90 days) exposure to antibiotics, immunocompromised state, recent history of hospitalization or of surgery and invasive procedure all within the preceding 90 days. We also recommend antimicrobial de-escalation strategy after culture results. Prompt and adequate antimicrobial therapy for cIAI reduces morbidity and mortality; however, the duration of therapy should be limited to no more than 4 days when adequate source control is achieved and the patient is clinically stable. The management of acute pancreatitis is conservative, with a role for antibiotic therapy only in specific situations and after microbiological diagnosis. The use of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents including systemic antifungals and newly approved antibiotics is preferably restricted to infectious diseases specialists. CONCLUSION: These guidelines represent a major step towards initiating a Lebanese national antimicrobial stewardship program. The LSIDCM emphasizes on development of a national AMR surveillance network, in addition to a national antibiogram for cIAI stratified based on the setting (community, hospital, unit-based) that should be frequently updated.

[New possibilities in antibacterial treatment of intra-abdominal infections caused by multiresistant microflora]. / Novye vozmozhnosti antibakterial'noi terapii intraabdominal'nykh infektsii, vyzvannykh polirezistentnoi mikrobnoi floroi.

AIM: To determine the place of new drugs with activity against multidrug resistant strains of microorganisms in the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The incidence and distribution of pathogens isolated from intra-abdominal specimens in patients with intra-abdominal infections are analyzed. RESULTS: The current situation on the growth of resistant strains among pathogens causing intra-abdominal infections is rewied. New combined drugs for the treatment of multidrug resistant infections - ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidim/avibactam plus metronidazole, has been suggested. Their potential role in empiric and targeted antibacterial treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections is defined. CONCLUSION: Taking into consideration local monitoring data and risk factors of multi resistant strains Ceftolozane/tazobactam in combination with metronidazole can be used in empiric regime of treatment. Due to the high activity on carbapenem resistant strains of Klebsiella pneumonia and the lack of alternatives, it is advisable to use Ceftazidim/avibactam for the targeted therapy.

Outcome of patients with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis undergoing simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Controversy remains with regard to the higher risk of intra-abdominal infections and lower patient and graft survival when peritoneal dialysis (PD) rather than hemodialysis (HD) is used in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT). METHODS: From March 1995 to December 2015, we performed 165 SPKTs. Prior to transplant, patients received hemodialysis (group HD; n = 98) or peritoneal dialysis (group PD; n = 67). A comparison was made to analyze post-transplant complications and patient, pancreas, and kidney graft survivals. RESULTS: Donor, pretransplant, and perioperative recipient variables were similar in both groups. Overall rates of infections (69.4% in HD vs 73.1% in PD; P = .50) and intra-abdominal infections (31.6% in HD vs 35.8 in PD; P = .57) were similar in both groups. The rates of pancreatitis, hemorrhage or thrombosis of the graft, duodenal graft leak, relaparotomy, transplantectomy, pancreas rejection, and retransplantation were similar in both groups. Patient survival at 1, 3, and 5 years (95.9%, 93.9%, and 93.9% in HD vs 95.5%, 92.2%, and 90.4% in PD; P = .54) and pancreas graft survival (83.6%, 78.0%, and 71.8% in HD vs 79.2%, 77.4%, and 71.0% in PD; P = .8) were similar in both groups. Kidney graft survival was similar in both groups. Pancreas graft thrombosis, rejection, and relaparotomy for intra-abdominal complications were independent predictors of lower pancreas graft survival, but dialysis modality did not influence patient or graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-SPKT modality of dialysis does not significantly influence overall or intra-abdominal infection and patient, pancreas, or kidney graft survivals.

Multicenter performance evaluation of the Unyvero IAI cartridge for detection of intra-abdominal infections.

Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are one of the most common type of infections in patients with sepsis and an important cause of death in intensive care units. Early detection and treatment are necessary to reduce patient complications and improve outcomes. The Unyvero IAI Application (Curetis GmbH) is the first automated assay to rapidly and simultaneously identify a large panel of bacteria, fungi, toxins, and antibiotic resistance markers directly from IAI-related samples. The assay was evaluated in four European clinical laboratories in comparison to routine microbiological practices. A total of 300 clinical samples were tested with an overall sensitivity of 89.3% and specificity of 99.5%, while time to results was reduced by an average of about 17 h compared to identification (ID) results and 41 h compared to full antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) results. The Unyvero IAI was able to detect additional microorganisms compared with culture, in particular anaerobes, with most detections confirmed by sequencing. The most frequent resistance markers detected were mecA/mecC (n = 25), aacA4 (n = 20), and blaCTX-M (n = 17) and carbapenemase genes were identified in nine specimens. Further studies are now required to determine the clinical impact of this new rapid test which could play a role in the successful treatment of IAI.

Low risk of intra-abdominal infections in rectal cancer patients treated with Hartmann's procedure: a report from a national registry.

PURPOSE: To describe the postoperative surgical complications in patients with rectal cancer undergoing Hartmann's procedure (HP). METHODS: Data were retrieved from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry for all patients with rectal cancer undergoing HP in 2007-2014. A retrospective analysis was performed using prospectively recorded data. Characteristics of patients and risk factors for intra-abdominal infection and re-laparotomy were analysed. RESULTS: Of 10,940 patients resected for rectal cancer, 1452 (13%) underwent HP (median age, 77 years). The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was 3-4 in 43% of patients; 15% had distant metastases and 62% underwent a low HP. The intra-abdominal infection rate was 8% and re-laparotomy rate was 10%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified preoperative radiotherapy (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.14-2.77), intra-operative bowel perforation (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.08-3.67), T4 tumours (OR, 1.68; 95% CI 1.04-2.69) and female gender (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.15-2.61) as risk factors for intra-abdominal infection. ASA score 3-4 (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.12-2.34), elevated BMI (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.09) and female gender (OR, 2.06; CI, 1.41-3.00) were risk factors for re-laparotomy after HP. The rate of intra-abdominal infection was not increased after a low HP. CONCLUSIONS: Despite older age and co-morbidities including more advanced cancer, patients undergoing Hartmann's procedure had low rates of serious postoperative complications and re-laparotomy. A low HP was not associated with a higher rate of intra-abdominal infection. HP seems to be appropriate for old and frail patients with rectal cancer.

[Intra-abdominal infections. Update and recommendations]. / Infecciones intraabdominales. Puesta al día y recomendaciones de la Sociedad Argentina de Infectología.

Intra-abdominal infections represent a group of intra and retroperitoneal processes, ranging from localized infections to complicated ones, sepsis and septic shock, associated with a significant mortality rate. They are the third most commonly identified cause of sepsis and the second cause of death in the intensive care unit. Although antimicrobial therapy must be started as soon as possible, especially in critically ill patients, the source control procedure is highly relevant. On account of the importance of this subject, members of the Argentine Society of Infectious Diseases (SADI) and intensive care specialists joined to develop recommendations on diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of intra-abdominal infections. The literature published within the last 10 years was reviewed and analyzed, in addition of expert opinions and local data. This statement provides a basic tool for diagnosis based on clinical and microbiological criteria, orientation on empirical antimicrobial therapy schemes according to source, acquisition place (community or healthcare associated infections), infection severity, treatment duration, importance of source control, and preventive measures aimed to reduce surgical site infection risk. Likewise, it provides a simple algorithm for diagnosis and treatment for use in clinical practice. The work reveals the concern about the management of intra-abdominal infections, establishing local guidelines to optimize diagnosis, treatment and prevention, with the aim of reducing morbidity, mortality, length of stay, costs and antimicrobial resistance.

Prevalence of Invasive Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae among Adult Patients in U.S. Hospitals.

This large-scale retrospective analysis (n = 60,551) of the Premier inpatient database (1 January 2011 to 31 December 2014) found an overall prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae strains of 2.3% (range, 0.9% to 5.8% by geographic region) among patients with infections due to Enterobacteriaceae Ongoing monitoring and development of decision support tools/algorithms are needed for identification of high-risk patients.

Assessment of hemodynamic response to fluid resuscitation of patients with intra-abdominal sepsis in low- and middle-income countries.

BACKGROUND: Patients with intra-abdominal infections need to achieve adequate hemodynamic status before being taken to the operating room. Multiple parameters (urinary output [UOP], vital signs, inferior vena cava collapsibility index, and central venous pressure) may be used to assess hemodynamic response to fluid resuscitation, but the options are few in limited-resource settings. This study aimed at assessing if a bedside-performed ultrasound to assess the inferior vena cava collapsibility index is superior to UOP in assessing hemodynamic response to fluid resuscitation. METHODS: All adult patients presenting to a tertiary referral hospital in the capital city of Rwanda with intra-abdominal infection requiring intravenous fluid (IVF) resuscitation before operation were included in this study. Before IVF administration, the baseline inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVC-CI) and vital parameters were recorded. After initiation of IVF resuscitation, serial measurements of IVC-CI and UOP were recorded every 2 h until the decision was made to take the patient to the operating room. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled. The mean duration of symptoms was 4.7 days. Four patients (16%) had altered mental status as a presenting symptom. Half of all patients had generalized peritonitis due to gangrenous bowel as the primary diagnosis (n = 12). The mean difference between time of hemodynamic response based on IVC-CI versus UOP was 2 h (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of the IVC-CI can provide early detection of hemodynamic response to fluid therapy in patients with intra-abdominal infection with spontaneous breathing compared to UOP. Future research should utilize this parameter in the preoperative management of hemodynamically unstable patients.