Laparoscopic Essure® Device Removal by En Bloc Salpingectomy-Cornuectomy with Intraoperative X-Ray Checking: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and morbidity of Essure® device removal via laparoscopic en bloc salpingectomy-cornuectomy resection (LSC) and the utility of confirmation of complete removal with an intraoperative X-ray of the removed specimen (IX-S). DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Academic hospitals of La Conception, Marseille, and Arnaud-de-Villeneuve, Montpellier, France. PATIENTS: Women who were not seeking future fertility seeking Essure® device removal by salpingectomy, between February 2017 and August 2018. INTERVENTIONS: All women underwent LSC. An IX-S was performed to confirm complete Essure® device removal. In the case of an unsatisfactory IX-S, an intraoperative pelvic X-ray control of the patient (IX-P) was performed. If IX-P diagnosed residual Essure® fragments, an additional resection was performed, and the removed tissue was checked by IX-S. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We included 72 women, and a total of 140 Essure® devices were removed. The IX-S confirmed complete Essure® device removal in 131 of 140 cases (93.6%) in 63 of 72 women (87.5%). Out of the 9 women with unsatisfactory IX-S, 6 had no residual Essure® fragments at IX-P, and Essure® device removal was considered complete. Three women had a persistent Essure® fragment at IX-P: an additional resection allowed complete removal in 2 cases and resulted in failure in 1 of 140 case (0.7%). There were 2 of 72 women (2.8%) intraoperative complications and 4 of 72 women (5.6%) postoperative grade 1 complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. CONCLUSION: Essure® device removal by LSC appears to be an effective and safe procedure. IX-S is a useful method to evaluate whether the removal of Essure® device is complete during an LSC procedure.

Isocentric fixed angle irradiation-based DRR: a novel approach to enhance x-ray and CT image registration.

Objective.Digitally reconstructed radiography (DRR) plays an important role in the registration of intraoperative x-ray and preoperative CT images. However, existing DRR algorithms often neglect the critical isocentric fixed angle irradiation (IFAI) principle in C-arm imaging, resulting in inaccurate simulation of x-ray images. This limitation degrades registration algorithms relying on DRR image libraries or employing DRR images (DRRs) to train neural network models. To address this issue, we propose a novel IFAI-based DRR method that accurately captures the true projection transformation during x-ray imaging of the human body.Approach.By strictly adhering to the IFAI principle and utilizing known parameters from intraoperative x-ray images paired with CT scans, our method successfully simulates the real projection transformation and generates DRRs that closely resemble actual x-ray images.Main result.Experimental results validate the effectiveness of our IFAI-based DRR method by successfully registering intraoperative x-ray images with preoperative CT images from multiple patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic procedures.Significance. The proposed IFAI-based DRR method enhances the quality of DRR images, significantly accelerates the construction of DRR image libraries, and thereby improves the performance of x-ray and CT image registration. Additionally, the method has the generality of registering CT and x-ray images generated by large C-arm devices.

The case for intra-operative X-ray in cochlear implantation: Four illustrative cases and literature review.

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the utility of routine intraoperative plain film imaging in optimizing outcomes in cochlear implantation. INTRODUCTION: Evolving surgical techniques, programming, and electrode arrays have all improved performance outcomes in cochlear implantation. Yet despite decreasing complication rates, electrode misplacement remains a common occurrence. Utilization of intraoperative confirmational tools (radiologic, electrophysiologic) remains unstandardized despite the acknowledged importance of proper electrode positioning. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the use and benefits of intraoperative X-ray (IOXR) in four cases, particularly in cases of normal electrophysiologic testing. METHODS: Four cases performed by an experienced CI surgeon are discussed where electrode malposition was only detected through X-ray. Literature review was performed on the use of intraoperative imaging, focusing on plain film radiography. RESULTS: Case 1-3 describe examples of resistance-free electrode insertion in patients with normal pre-operative imaging. Intraoperative impedances and neural response telemetry (NRT) were normal. However, IOXR ultimately revealed tip fold-over prompting array repositioning. Case 4 describes an elective replacement of a soft-failing device. Resistance was encountered during array insertion, with IOXR demonstrating incomplete insertion compared with prior imaging. Positioning was revised to achieve pre-revision insertion depth, demonstrating the utility of prior IOXR in revision cases. Literature review of IOXR is discussed. CONCLUSION: Appropriate placement of the electrode is paramount to successful CI outcomes. These cases illustrate IOXR as a safe, effective method to ensure optimal placement even in cases of normal electrophysiologic testing, supporting its routine use even by the most seasoned surgeons.

Spontaneous migration of a falling bullet in the cerebellum reveals the importance of intraoperative skull X-ray.

Cranial gunshot wounds (CGSWs) are the most lethal types of the cranial traumas and they are usually mortal. Falling bullets or gravitational bullets are the ones that move under the effect of the gravity force after the muzzle force diminished. CGSWs constitute a major clinical challenge for neurosurgeons dealing with trauma in both the military and civil experience. We report the case of a 21-year-old man with a falling bullet wound to the head. The decision of surgical treatment of a bullet injury is difficult if it is in close proximity to vital structures; removal of the bullet may cause significant neurological damage; however, migration can lead to a worsening of the neurological status of the patient. Before surgical removal of any intracranial bullet, as valuable information, it is recommended that a plain skull X-ray be obtained after final positioning of the head.

A perspective on wrong level, wrong side, and wrong site spine surgery.

BACKGROUND: Four of the most common "errors" in spine surgery include: operating on the wrong patient, doing the wrong procedure, performing wrong-level surgery (WLS), and/or performing wrong-sided surgery (WSS). Although preoperative verification protocols (i.e. Universal Protocol, routine Time-Outs, and using the 3 R's (i.e. right patient, right procedure, right level/side)) have largely limited the first two "errors," WLS and WSS still occur with an unacceptably high frequency. METHODS: In 20 studies, we identified the predominant factors contributing to WLS/WSS; unusual/anatomical anomalies/variants (i.e. sacralized lumbar vertebrae. lumbarized sacral vertebra, Klippel-Feil vertebrae, block vertebrae, butterfly vertebrae, obesity/morbid obesity), inadequate/poor interpretation of X-rays/fluoroscopic intraoperative images, and failure to follow different verification protocols. RESULTS: "Human error" was another major risk factor contributing to the failure to operate at the correct level/side (WLS/WSS). Factors comprising "human error" included; surgeon/staff fatigue, rushing, emergency circumstances, lack of communication, hierarchical behavior in the operating room, and failure to "speak up". CONCLUSION: Utilizing the Universal Protocol, routine Time Outs, and the 3 R's largelly avoid operating on the wrong spine patient, and performing the wrong procedure. However, these guidelines have not yet sufficiently reduced the frequently of WLS and WSS. Greater recognition of the potential pitfalls contributing to WLS/WSS as reviewed in this perspective should better equip spine surgeons to avert/limit such "errors" in the future.

Frameless Stereotaxis for Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation: An Innovative Method for the Direct Visualization of Electrode Implantation by Intraoperative X-ray Control.

The recent introduction of frameless devices has enabled stereotactic neurosurgery to reach a level of accuracy that is comparable to traditional frame-based methodologies. Among frameless devices, the Nexframe appears to be very useful in implanting electrodes into the subthalamic nucleus or other structures for deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. However, frameless devices, including the Nexframe, limit the possibility of intraoperative visual control of the placement of electrodes in the brain. Utilizing intraoperative O-arm Computed tomography (CT) scan or high-field Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) could overcome this limitation, but their high cost restricts their use. Thus, in this paper we propose an innovation in Nexframe surgical planning that allows the intraoperative use of a C-arm X-ray apparatus to establish: (1) the progression of the electrode guide tube and the electrode in the brain; (2) the accuracy of the electrode trajectory; and (3) the correct attainment of the target. The proposed frameless technique using the Nexframe has been developed and successfully applied in our practice. It was shown to be helpful in overcoming the major issues that are usually encountered when electrodes are placed in the brain with frameless neurosurgery and reduced the risk of having to re-operate on patients to reposition the electrodes.