Effect of donor warm ischemia time during graft extraction in right lobe robotic donor hepatectomy on recipient outcomes-A propensity score matched analysis.

One of the concerns specific to minimally invasive donor hepatectomy (MIDH) is the prolonged time required for graft extraction after completion of the donor hepatectomy (donor warm ischemia time [DWIT]). There has never been an objective evaluation of minimally invasive donor hepatectomy-DWIT on allograft function in living donor liver transplantation. We evaluated the effect of DWIT following robotic donor hepatectomy (RDH) on recipient outcomes and compared them with a matched cohort of open donor hepatectomy (ODH). Demographic, perioperative, and recipient's postoperative outcome data for all right lobe (RL)-RDH performed between September 2019 and July 2023 were analyzed and compared with a propensity score matched cohort (1:1) of RL-ODH from the same time period. Of a total of 103 RL-RDH and 446 RL-ODH, unmatched and propensity score matched analysis (1:1) revealed a significantly longer DWIT in the RDH group as compared to the ODH group (9.33 ± 3.95 vs 2.87 ± 2.13, P < .0001). This did not translate into any difference in the rates of early allograft dysfunction (EAD), biliary complications, major morbidity, or overall 1-and 3-month survival. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis threshold for DWIT-early allograft dysfunction was 9 minutes (area under receiver operating characteristic: 0.67, sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 53.8%). We show that prolonged DWIT within an acceptable range in RDH does not have deleterious effects on short-term recipient outcomes. Further long-term studies are required to confirm our findings, especially with regard to nonanastomotic biliary complications.

Interaction between cold ischemia time and Kidney Donor Profile Index on postrenal transplant outcomes.

We analyzed whether there is an interaction between the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) and cold ischemia time (CIT) in recipients of deceased donor kidney transplant (KTs). Adults who underwent KTs in the United States between 2014 and 2020 were included and divided into 3 KDPI groups (≤20%, 21%-85%, >85%) and 4 CIT strata (<12, 12-17.9, 18-23.9, ≥24 hours). Multivariate analyses were used to test the interaction between KDPI and CIT for the following outcomes: primary graft nonfunction (PGNF), delayed graft function (DGF), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 6 and 12 months, patient survival, graft survival, and death-censored graft survival (DCGS). A total of 69,490 recipients were analyzed: 18,241 (26.3%) received a graft with KDPI ≤20%, 46,953 (67.6%) with KDPI 21%-85%, and 4,296 (6.2%) with KDPI >85%. Increasing KDPI and CIT were associated with worse post-KT outcomes. Contrary to our hypothesis, howerver, the interaction between KDPI and CIT was statistically significant only for PGNF and DGF and eGFR at 6 months. Paradoxically, the negative coefficient of the interaction suggested that increasing duration of CIT was more detrimental for low and intermediate-KDPI organs relative to high-KDPI grafts. Conversely, for mortality, graft survival, and DCGS, we found that the interaction between CIT and KDPI was not statistically significant. We conclude that, high KDPI and prolonged CIT are independent risk factors for inferior outcomes after KT. Their interaction, however, is statistically significant only for the short-term outcomes and more pronounced on low and intermediate-KDPI grafts than high-KDPI kidneys.

Re-assessing prolonged cold ischemia time in kidney transplantation through machine learning consensus clustering.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to cluster deceased donor kidney transplant recipients with prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT) using an unsupervised machine learning approach. METHODS: We performed consensus cluster analysis on 11 615 deceased donor kidney transplant patients with CIT exceeding 24 h using OPTN/UNOS data from 2015 to 2019. Cluster characteristics of clinical significance were identified, and post-transplant outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Consensus cluster analysis identified two clinically distinct clusters. Cluster 1 was characterized by young, non-diabetic patients who received kidney transplants from young, non-hypertensive, non-ECD deceased donors with lower KDPI scores. In contrast, the patients in cluster 2 were older and more likely to have diabetes. Cluster 2 recipients were more likely to receive transplants from older donors with a higher KDPI. There was lower use of machine perfusion in Cluster 1 and incrementally longer CIT in Cluster 2. Cluster 2 had a higher incidence of delayed graft function (42% vs. 29%), and lower 1-year patient (95% vs. 98%) and death-censored (95% vs. 97%) graft survival compared to Cluster 1. CONCLUSIONS: Unsupervised machine learning characterized deceased donor kidney transplant recipients with prolonged CIT into two clusters with differing outcomes. Although Cluster 1 had more favorable recipient and donor characteristics and better survival, the outcomes observed in Cluster 2 were also satisfactory. Overall, both clusters demonstrated good survival suggesting opportunities for transplant centers to incrementally increase CIT.

Impact of Warm Ischemia Time on Donation After Circulatory Death Kidney Transplant Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Efforts to address the shortage of donor organs include increasing the use of renal allografts from donors after circulatory death (DCD). While warm ischemia time (WIT) is thought to be an important factor in DCD kidney evaluation, few studies have compared the relationship between WIT and DCD kidney outcomes, and WIT acceptance practices remain variable. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective review of all adult patients who underwent deceased donor kidney transplantation from 2000 to 2021. We evaluated the impact of varied functional warm ischemia time (fWIT) in controlled DCD donors by comparing donor and recipient characteristics and posttransplant outcomes between high fWIT (>60 min), low fWIT (≤60 min), and kidneys transplanted from donors after brain death (DBD). RESULTS: Two thousand eight hundred eleven patients were identified, 638 received low fWIT DCD, 93 received high fWIT DCD, and 2080 received DBD kidneys. There was no significant difference in 5-year graft survival between the DCD low fWIT, high fWIT, and DBD groups, with 84%, 83%, and 83% of grafts functioning, respectively. Five-year patient survival was 91% in the low fWIT group, 92% in the high fWIT group, and 90% in the DBD group. An increase in kidney donor risk index (KDRI) (HR 3.37, 95% CI = 2.1-5.7) and high CIT compared to low CIT (HR 2.12, 95% CI = 1.4-3.1) have higher hazard ratios for 1-year graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: Increased acceptance of kidneys from selected DCD donors with prolonged fWIT may present an opportunity to increase kidney utilization while preserving outcomes. Our group specifically prioritizes the use of kidneys from younger donors, with lower KDPI, and without acute kidney injury, or risk factors for underlying chronic kidney disease.

Characteristics of Delayed Graft Function and Long-Term Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation From Brain-Dead Donors: A Single-Center and Multicenter Registry-Based Retrospective Study.

Delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation is common and associated with worse graft outcomes. However, little is known about factors affecting graft survival post-DGF. We studied the association of cold ischemia time (CIT) and Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) with the long-term outcomes of deceased brain-dead donor kidneys with and without DGF. Data from Finland (n = 2,637) and from the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) registry (n = 61,405) was used. The association of KDPI and CIT with the graft survival of kidneys with or without DGF was studied using multivariable models. 849 (32%) kidneys had DGF in the Finnish cohort. DGF and KDPI were independent risk factors for graft loss, [HR 1.32 (95% CI 1.14-1.53), p < 0.001, and HR 1.01 per one point (95% CI 1.01-1.01), p < 0.001, respectively], but CIT was not, [HR 1.00 per CIT hour (95% CI 0.99-1.02), p = 0.84]. The association of DGF remained similar regardless of CIT and KDPI. The US cohort had similar results, but the association of DGF was stronger with higher KDPI. In conclusion, DGF and KDPI, but not CIT, are independently associated with graft survival. The association of DGF with worse graft survival is consistent across different CITs but stronger among marginal donors.

Complications in Prolonged Intraoperative Ischemia Time in Free Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Autologous tissue transfer is an effective option for breast reconstruction post-mastectomy, with microsurgical techniques continually evolving. However, a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between prolonged ischemia time during free flap-based breast reconstruction and increased postoperative complications is still lacking. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Methodological quality was evaluated using the MINORS criteria. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed for total complications, complete and partial flap loss, and secondary outcomes. Data heterogeneity and risk ratios were assessed. RESULTS: Seventeen studies encompassing 5636 patients and 6884 free flaps were included. The mean age of patients was 49.43 years (95% CI: 48.27-50.60), with a mean BMI of 26.09 (95% CI: 21.97-30.21), and an average post-harvesting free flap ischemia time of 70.35 min (95% CI: 56.71-83.98). These analyses revealed a heightened risk of total complications (RR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.61-2.46), complete flap loss (RR: 3.15, 95% CI: 1.32-7.52), partial flap loss (RR: 1.91, 95% CI: 0.92-4.00), hematoma (RR: 1.79, 95% CI: 0.96-3.32), and infection (RR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.32-3.42) in cases with ischemia time exceeding 60 min. Venous complications predominated in free flap failure cases. CONCLUSIONS: Effectively managing ischemia time could be crucial in free flap breast reconstruction to potentially reduce postoperative complications. Although there is a correlation between managing ischemia time and reducing postoperative complications, further research is needed to investigate the possible causation behind this relationship. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Systematic review of techniques and devices used to avoid warm ischemia time injury during kidney transplantation.

PURPOSE: The lack of a reliable and reproducible technique to ensure a constantly low temperature of the graft during kidney transplantation (KT) may be a cause of renal nonfunction. The aim of this review was to assess all the methods and devices available to ensure hypothermia during vascular anastomosis in KT. METHODS: A literature search was conducted through May 2022 using PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022326550). RESULTS: A total of 20 studies reporting on four hypothermia techniques met our inclusion criteria. Simple instillation of cold serum is not sufficient, the graft reaching up to 33 ℃ at the end of warm ischemia time (WIT). Plastic bags filled with ice slush have questionable efficiency. The use of a gauze jacket filled with ice-slush was reported in 12/20 studies. It ensures a graft temperature up to 20.3 ℃ at the end of WIT. Some concerns have been linked to potentially inhomogeneous parenchymal cooling and secondary ileus. Novel devices with continuous flow of ice-cold solution around the graft might overcome these limitations, showing a renal temperature below 20 ℃ at all times during KT. CONCLUSION: The gauze filled with ice slush is the most common technique, but several aspects can be improved. Novel devices in the form of cold-ischemia jackets can ensure a lower and more stable temperature of the graft during KT, leading to higher efficiency and reproducibility.

The role of warm ischemia time on functional outcomes after robotic partial nephrectomy: a radionuclide renal scan study from the clock randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between warm ischemia time (WIT) duration and renal function after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). METHODS: The CLOCK trial is a phase 3 randomized controlled trial comparing on- vs off-clamp RAPN. All patients underwent pre- and postoperative renal scintigraphy. Six-month absolute variation of eGFR (AV-GFR), rate of relative variation in eGFR over 25% (RV-GFR > 25), absolute variation of split renal function (SRF) at scintigraphy (AV-SRF). The relationships WIT/outcomes were assessed by correlation graphs and then modeled by uni- and multivariable regression. RESULTS: 324 patients were included (206 on-clamp, 118 off-clamp RAPN). Correlation graphs showed a threshold on WIT equal to 10 min. The differences in outcome measures between cases with WIT < vs ≥ 10 min were: AV-GFR - 3.7 vs - 7.5 ml/min (p < 0.001); AV-SRF - 1% vs - 3.6% (p < 0.001); RV-GFR > 25 9.3% vs 17.8% (p = 0.008). Multivariable models found that AV-GFR was related to WIT ≥ 10 min (regression coefficient [RC] - 0.52, p = 0.019), age (RC - 0.35, p = 0.001) and baseline eGFR (RC - 0.30, p < 0.001); RV-GFR > 25 to WIT ≥ 10 min (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, p = 0.007) and acute kidney injury defined as > 50% increase in serum creatinine (OR 19.7, p = 0.009); AV-SRF to WIT ≥ 10 min (RC - 0.30, p = 0.018), baseline SRF (RC - 0.76, p < 0.001) and RENAL score (RC - 0.60. p = 0.028). The main limitation was that the CLOCK trial was designed on a different endpoint and therefore the present analysis could be underpowered. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 10 min WIT had no consequences on functional outcomes. Above the 10-min threshold, a statistically significant, but clinically negligible impact was found.

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy-Technique and peri-operative outcomes in an Australian transplant center.

INTRODUCTION: Demand for donor kidneys far exceeds the availability of organs from deceased donors. Living donor kidneys are an important part of addressing this shortfall, and laparoscopic nephrectomy is an important strategy to reduce donor morbidity and increase the acceptability of living donation. AIM: To retrospectively review the intraoperative and postoperative safety, technique, and outcomes of patients undergoing donor nephrectomy at a single tertiary hospital in Sydney, Australia. METHOD: Retrospective capture and analysis of clinical, demographic, and operative data for all living donor nephrectomies performed between 2007 and 2022 at a single University Hospital in Sydney, Australia. RESULTS: Four hundred and seventy-two donor nephrectomies were performed: 471 were laparoscopic, two of which were converted from laparoscopic to open and hand-assisted nephrectomy, respectively, and one (.2%) underwent primary open nephrectomy. The mean warm ischemia time was 2.8 min (±1.3 SD, median 3 min, range 2-8 min) and the mean length of stay (LOS) was 4.1 days (±1.0 SD). The mean renal function on discharge was 103 µmol/L (±23.0 SD). Seventy-seven (16%) patients had a complication with no Clavien Dindo IV or V complications seen. Outcomes demonstrated no impact of donor age, gender, kidney side, relationship to the recipient, vascular complexity; or surgeon experience, on complication rate or LOS. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is a safe and effective procedure with minimal morbidity and no mortality in this series.

Outcomes of DCD kidneys with CIT-induced delayed graft function.

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidneys are exposed to warm ischemia, which, coupled with cold ischemia time (CIT) exacerbates delayed graft function (DGF) and is possibly associated with worse graft survival. To analyze the risk of CIT-induced DGF on DCD kidney outcomes, we evaluated national data between 2008 and 2018 of adult kidney-only recipients of paired DCD kidneys where one kidney recipient experienced DGF and the other did not. Of 5602 paired DCD kidney recipients, multivariate analysis between recipients with higher CIT relative to lower CIT showed that increasing CIT differences had a significant dose-dependent effect on overall graft survival. The graft survival risk was minimal with CIT differences of ≥1-h (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.07, 95% CI .95- 1.20, n = 5602) and ≥5-h (aHR 1.09, 95% CI .93-1.29, n = 2710) and became significant at CIT differences of ≥10-h (aHR 1.37, 95% CI 1.05-1.78, n = 1086) and ≥15-h (aHR 1.78, 95% CI 1.15-2.77, n = 1086). Between each of the four delta-CIT levels of shorter and longer CIT, there were no statistically significant differences in the proportion of acute rejection. These results suggest that in the setting of DCD kidney transplantation (KTX), DGF, specifically mediated by prolonged CIT, impacts long-term graft outcomes.

Lung Transplantation From Controlled and Uncontrolled Donation After Circulatory Death (DCD) Donors With Long Ischemic Times Managed by Simple Normothermic Ventilation and Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion Assessment.

Donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors are still subject of studies. In this prospective cohort trial, we compared outcomes after lung transplantation (LT) of subjects receiving lungs from DCD donors with those of subjects receiving lungs from donation after brain death (DBD) donors (ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT02061462). Lungs from DCD donors were preserved in-vivo through normothermic ventilation, as per our protocol. We enrolled candidates for bilateral LT ≥14 years. Candidates for multi-organ or re-LT, donors aged ≥65 years, DCD category I or IV donors were excluded. We recorded clinical data on donors and recipients. Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were: duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD3) and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). 121 patients (110 DBD Group, 11 DCD Group) were enrolled. 30-day mortality and CLAD prevalence were nil in the DCD Group. DCD Group patients required longer MV (DCD Group: 2 days, DBD Group: 1 day, p = 0.011). ICU length of stay and PGD3 rate were higher in DCD Group but did not significantly differ. LT with DCD grafts procured with our protocols appears safe, despite prolonged ischemia times.

Establishment of a risk prediction model for prolonged mechanical ventilation after lung transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV), mostly defined as mechanical ventilation > 72 h after lung transplantation with or without tracheostomy, is associated with increased mortality. Nevertheless, the predictive factors of PMV after lung transplant remain unclear. The present study aimed to develop a novel scoring system to identify PMV after lung transplantation. METHODS: A total of 141 patients who underwent lung transplantation were investigated in this study. The patients were divided into PMV and non-prolonged ventilation (NPMV) groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess factors associated with PMV. A risk nomogram was then established based on the multivariate analysis, and model performance was further examined regarding its calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. RESULTS: Eight factors were finally identified to be significantly associated with PMV by the multivariate analysis and therefore were included as risk factors in the nomogram as follows: the body mass index (BMI, P = 0.036); primary diagnosis as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF, P = 0.038); pulmonary hypertension (PAH, P = 0.034); primary graft dysfunction grading (PGD, P = 0.011) at T0; cold ischemia time (CIT P = 0.012); and three ventilation parameters (peak inspiratory pressure [PIP, P < 0.001], dynamic compliance [Cdyn, P = 0.001], and P/F ratio [P = 0.015]) at T0. The nomogram exhibited superior discrimination ability with an area under the curve of 0.895. Furthermore, both calibration curve and decision-curve analysis indicated satisfactory performance. CONCLUSION: A novel nomogram to predict individual risk of receiving PMV for patients after lung transplantation was established, which may guide preventative measures for tackling this adverse event.

Fluorescein clearance kinetics in blood and bile indicates hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats.

Quantitative measurement of the degree of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is crucial for developing therapeutic strategies for its treatment. We hypothesized that clearance of fluorescent dye through bile metabolism may reflect the degree of hepatic IRI. In this study, we investigated sodium fluorescein clearance kinetics in blood and bile for quantifying the degree of hepatic IRI. Warm ischemia times (WITs) of 0, 30, or 60 min followed by 1 h or 4 h of reperfusion, were applied to the median and lateral lobes of the liver in Sprague-Dawley rats. Subsequently, 2 mg/kg of sodium fluorescein was injected intravenously, and blood and bile samples were collected over 60 min to measure fluorescence intensities. The bile-to-plasma fluorescence ratios demonstrated an inverse correlation with WIT and were distinctly lower in the 60-min WIT group than in the control or 30-min WIT groups. Bile-to-plasma fluorescence ratios displayed superior discriminability for short versus long WITs when measured 1 h after reperfusion versus 4 h. We conclude that the bile-to-blood ratio of fluorescence after sodium fluorescein injection has the potential to enable the quantification of hepatic IRI severity.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Previous attempts to use fluorophore clearance to test liver function have relied on a single source of data. However, the kinetics of substrate processing via bile metabolism include decreasing levels in blood and increasing levels in bile. Thus, we analyzed data from blood and bile to better reflect fluorescein clearance kinetics.

Reducing cold ischemia time by donor liver "back-table" preparation under continuous oxygenated machine perfusion of the portal vein.

INTRODUCTION: Cold ischemia time is a well-known risk factor for the development of non-anastomotic biliary strictures (NAS) after liver transplantation. End-ischemic hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) of DCD liver grafts reduces the incidence of NAS, and has the potential to reduce cold ischemia times. We hypothesized that if a part of the back-table procedure could be performed under continuous HOPE, cold ischemia times would be reduced. METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, all nationwide declined livers that underwent DHOPE-NMP between July 1st 2021 and January 1st 2022 were included. The back-table of ten consecutive high-risk donor livers was performed with ongoing HOPE. Sixty DHOPE-NMP procedures (August 1st 2017-July 1st 2021) with a conventional back-table procedure functioned as a control group. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, this technique led to a decrease in non-oxygenated back-table time from median 74 min (IQR 58-92 min) to median 25 min (IQR 21-31 min), p < .01. Median total cold preservation times were reduced from 279 min (IQR 254-297) to 214 min (IQR 132-254), p < .01. CONCLUSION: Cold ischemia time of liver grafts can be successfully reduced by over one hour by using portal vein only HOPE during back-table preparation.

Kidney utility and futility.

Changes in kidney allocation coupled with the COVID-19 pandemic have placed tremendous strain on current systems of organ distribution and logistics. Although the number of deceased donors continues to rise annually in the United States, the proportion of marginal deceased donors (MDDs) is disproportionately growing. Cold ischemia times and kidney discard rates are rising in part related to inadequate planning, resources, and shortages. Complexity in kidney allocation and distribution has contributed to this dilemma. Logistical issues and the ability to reperfuse the kidney within acceptable time constraints increasingly determine clinical decision-making for organ acceptance. We have a good understanding of the phenotype of "hard to place" MDD kidneys, yet continue to promote a "one size fits all" approach to organ allocation. Allocation and transportation systems need to be agile, mobile, and flexible in order to accommodate the expanding numbers of MDD organs. By identifying "hard to place" MDD kidneys early and implementing a "fast-track" or open offer policy to expedite placement, the utilization rate of MDDs would improve dramatically. Organ allocation and distribution based on location, motivation, and innovation must lead the way. In the absence of change, we are sacrificing utility for futility and discard rates will continue to escalate.

Improved surgical outcomes following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in the contemporary era.

BACKGROUND: Complications leading to early technical failure have been the Achilles' heel of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT). The study purpose was to analyze longitudinally our experience with early surgical complications following SPKT with an emphasis on changes in practice that improved outcomes in the most recent era. STUDY DESIGN: Single center retrospective review of all SPKTs from 11/1/01 to 8/12/20 with enteric drainage. Early relaparotomy was defined as occurring within 3 months of SPKT. Patients were stratified into two sequential eras: Era 1 (E1): 11/1/01-5/30/13; Era 2 (E2) 6/1/13-8/12/20 based on changes in practice that occurred pursuant to donor age and pancreas cold ischemia time (CIT). RESULTS: 255 consecutive SPKTs were analyzed (E1, n = 165; E2, n = 90). E1 patients received organs from older donors (mean E1 27.3 vs. E2 23.1 years) with longer pancreas cold CITs) (mean E1 16.1 vs. E2 13.3 h, both p < .05). E1 patients had a higher early relaparotomy rate (E1 43.0% vs. E2 14.4%) and were more likely to require allograft pancreatectomy (E1 9.1% vs. E2 2.2%, both p < .05). E2 patients underwent systemic venous drainage more frequently (E1 8% vs. E2 29%) but pancreas venous drainage did not influence either relaparotomy or allograft pancreatectomy rates. The most common indications for early relaparotomy in E1 were allograft thrombosis (11.5%) and peri-pancreatic phlegmon/abscess (8.5%) whereas in E2 were thrombosis, pancreatitis/infection, and bowel obstruction (each 3%). CONCLUSION: Maximizing donor quality (younger donors) and minimizing pancreas CIT are paramount for reducing early surgical complications following SPKT.

Normothermic Regional Perfusion and Hypothermic Oxygenated Machine Perfusion for Livers Donated After Controlled Circulatory Death With Prolonged Warm Ischemia Time: A Matched Comparison With Livers From Brain-Dead Donors.

Prolonged warm ischemia time (WIT) has a negative prognostic value in liver transplantation (LT) using grafts procured after circulatory death (DCD). To assess the value of abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (A-NRP) associated with dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (D-HOPE) in controlled DCD LT, prospectively collected data on LTs performed between January 2016 and July 2021 were analyzed. Outcome of controlled DCD LTs performed using A-NRP + D-HOPE (n = 20) were compared to those performed with grafts procured after brain death (DBD) (n = 40), selected using propensity-score matching. DCD utilization rate was 59.5%. In the DCD group, median functional WIT, A-NRP and D-HOPE time was 43, 246, and 205 min, respectively. Early outcomes of DCD grafts recipients were comparable to those of matched DBD LTs. In DCD and DBD group, incidence of anastomotic biliary complications and ischemic cholangiopathy was 15% versus 22% (p = 0.73) and 5% versus 2% (p = 1), respectively. One-year patient and graft survival was 100% versus 95% (p = 0.18) and 90% versus 95% (p = 0.82). In conclusion, the association of A-NRP + D-HOPE in DCD LT with prolonged WIT allows achieving comparable outcomes to DBD LT.

Effect of ischemic time on pediatric heart transplantation outcomes: is it the same for all allografts?

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that the optimal ischemia time (IT) threshold in pediatric heart transplantation (PHT) is up to 4 h, independent of other donor organ factors. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between IT and donor left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and study their impact on PHT outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of PHT (<18 years) identified in UNOS between January 2000 and March 2020. Post-transplantation survival analysis of patients receiving donor hearts with IT<4, 4-6, and >6 h was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cohort was divided according to donor LVEF median value, and survival was analyzed. Cox regression was performed. RESULTS: Median LVEF was 65% in the study cohort (6669 PHT). Overall, IT>6 h was associated with worse survival compared to <4 h regardless of donor LVEF. For allografts with LVEF < 65%, IT = 4-6 h was associated with worse survival compared with IT < 4 h (p = .006) but had similar survival compared with IT > 6 h (p = .315). For allografts with LVEF ≥ 65%, IT = 4-6 h had similar survival compared with <4 h (p = .175) but improved survival compared with >6 h (p = .003). After adjusting for donor and recipient variables, Cox regression showed that IT = 4-6 h was not associated with increased mortality for LVEF ≥ 65%. CONCLUSIONS: The IT threshold of 4 h does not apply to all allografts. Recipients of hearts with LVEF≥65% can tolerate an IT up to 6 h without any detriment to survival. Routine acceptance of these donor hearts could mitigate longer waiting times and poor donor availability for many candidates.

Association between total ischemic time and in-hospital mortality after emergency PCI in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Symptom-to-balloon time (SBT) represents the total ischemic time in ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) and is associated with poor long-term outcomes. The study aimed to explore the association between SBT and in-hospital mortality after emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute STEMI. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter, observational study included patients admitted to the Hebei General Hospital, Baoding No. 1 Central Hospital, and Cangzhou Central Hospital from January 2016 to December 2018. The outcome was all-cause mortality during the hospital stay. Logistic regression models were established to explore the association between SBT and all-cause mortality during the hospital stay. RESULTS: This study included 1169 patients: 876 males of 59.6 ± 11.4 years of age, and 293 females 66.3 ± 13.3 years of age. A first analysis showed EF had an interaction with SBT (P = 0.01). In patients with EF ≥ 50%, SBT was not an independent risk factor for postoperative all-cause mortality in the hospital (all P > 0.05). In patients with EF < 50%, SBT was an independent risk factor for postoperative all-cause mortality in the hospital [model 3: 1.51 (1.17, 1.54), P for trend = 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: SBT was independently associated with all-cause mortality in the hospital after PCI in patients with acute STEMI and EF < 50%. Specifically, the risk of in-hospital mortality for those with SBT ≥ 361 min is increased by 51% compared with those with SBT ≤ 120 min.

Analysis of risk factors for donation after circulatory death kidney transplantation in Japan.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, donations after circulatory death kidney transplantation are widely performed due to legislation delays. The number of donations after brain death kidney transplantations is increasing, but the target remains unmet. We reviewed the outcomes of donation after circulatory death in Japan. METHODS: We analyzed 2923 deceased kidney transplantations (2239: donation after circulatory death (DCD), 684: donation after brain death (DBD)) performed in Japan from 2000 to 2019. The outcomes of the DCD and DBD groups were compared. We examined the risk factors for graft loss in the DCD group. RESULTS: The 5-year patient survival and death-censored graft survival rates of the DCD group, obtained by propensity score matching, were 93.6% and 95.2%, respectively, which were equivalent to 94.2% and 93.8%, respectively, obtained in the DBD group. Older donors (≥ 50 years) and prolonged cold ischemia time (≥ 12 h) were risk factors for graft loss; in the presence of these, graft survival was lower in the DCD group. CONCLUSIONS: Older donors and prolonged cold ischemia time reduced graft survival in the DCD group. Proper evaluation of donors and careful preparation for transplant surgery are, therefore, essential to ensure good transplant outcomes.