Low-Dose Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) is preferred when available for hemodynamically unstable acute kidney injury (AKI) patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommend a delivered CKRT dose of 20-25mL/kg/h; however, in Japan the doses are typically below this recommendation due to government health insurance system restrictions. This study investigated the association between mortality and dose of CKRT. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Critically ill patients with AKI treated with CKRT at a tertiary Japanese university hospital between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2021. EXPOSURE: Delivered CKRT doses below or above the median. OUTCOME: 90-day mortality after CKRT initiation. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Multivariable Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 494 patients. The median age was 72 years, and 309 patients (62.6%) were men. Acute tubular injury was the leading cause of AKI, accounting for 81.8%. The median delivered CKRT dose was 13.2mL/kg/h. Among the study participants, 456 (92.3%) received delivered CKRT doses below 20mL/kg/h, and 204 (41.3%) died within 90 days after CKRT initiation. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed increased mortality in the below-median group (HR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.19-2.51], P=0.004). Additionally, a significant, inverse, nonlinear association between 90-day mortality and delivered CKRT dose was observed using delivered CKRT dose as a continuous variable. LIMITATIONS: Single-center, retrospective, observational study. CONCLUSIONS: A lower delivered CKRT dose was independently associated with higher 90-day mortality among critically ill patients who mostly received dosing below the current KDIGO recommendations. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommend delivering a continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) dose of 20-25mL/kg/h. However, it is not clear if it is safe to use delivered CKRT doses below this recommendation. In this study, over 90% of the patients received CKRT with a delivered dose below the KDIGO recommendation. We divided these patients into 2 groups based on the median delivered CKRT dose. Our findings show that a delivered CKRT dose below the median was associated with increased risk of death within 90 days. These findings show that a lower delivered CKRT dose was independently associated with higher 90-day mortality among critically ill patients who mostly received dosing below current KDIGO recommendations.

Provider perspectives on treatment decision-making in nephrotic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Managing patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS) remains difficult for the practicing nephrologist. This often young patient population is faced with a debilitating, relapsing and remitting disease with non-specific treatment options that are often poorly tolerated. Clinicians managing these complex patients must attempt to apply disease-specific evidence while considering the individual patient's clinical and personal situation. METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews to ascertain the provider perspectives of NS, treatment options and factors that influence recommendations for disease management, and administered a survey to assess both facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines. RESULTS: When making treatment recommendations, providers considered characteristics of various treatments such as efficacy, side effects and evaluation of risk versus benefit, taking into account how the specific treatment fit with the individual patient. Time constraints and the complexity of explaining the intricacies of NS were noted as significant barriers to care. Although the availability of guidelines was deemed a facilitator to care, the value of the KDIGO guidelines was limited by the perception of poor quality of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The complexity of NS and the scarcity of robust evidence to support treatment recommendations are common challenges reported by nephrologists. Future development and use of shared learning platforms may support the integration of best available evidence, patient/family preferences and exchange of information at a pace that is unconstrained by the outpatient clinic schedule.

Using pharmacists to improve risk stratification and management of stage 3A chronic kidney disease: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of albuminuria to stratify risk in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is not done universally in the primary care setting despite recommendation in KDIGO (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes) guidelines. Pharmacist medication therapy management (MTM) may be helpful in improving CKD risk stratification and management. METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial using seven primary care clinic sites in the Geisinger Health System to evaluate the feasibility of pharmacist MTM in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 45-59 ml/min/1.73 m2 and uncontrolled blood pressure (≥150/85 mmHg). In the three pharmacist MTM sites, pharmacists were instructed to follow a protocol aimed to improve adherence to KDIGO guidelines on testing for proteinuria and lipids, and statin and blood pressure medical therapy. In the four control clinics, patients received usual care. The primary outcome was proteinuria screening over a follow-up of 1 year. A telephone survey was administered to physicians, pharmacists, and patients in the pharmacist MTM arm at the end of the trial. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between pharmacist MTM (n = 24) and control (n = 23) patients, although pharmacist MTM patients tended to be younger (64 vs. 71 y; p = 0.06) and less likely to have diabetes (17 % vs. 35 %; p = 0.2) or baseline proteinuria screening (41.7 % vs. 60.9 %, p = 0.2). Mean eGFR was 54 ml/min/1.73 m2 in both groups. The pharmacist MTM intervention did not significantly improve total proteinuria screening at the population level (OR 2.6, 95 % CI: 0.5-14.0; p = 0.3). However, it tended to increase screening of previously unscreened patients (78.6 % in the pharmacist MTM group compared to 33.3 % in the control group; OR 7.3, 95 % CI: 0.96-56.3; p = 0.05). In general, the intervention was well-received by patients, pharmacists, and providers, who agreed that pharmacists could play an important role in CKD management. A few patients contacted the research team to express anxiety about having a CKD diagnosis without prior knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacist MTM may be useful in improving risk stratification and management of CKD in the primary care setting, although implementation requires ongoing education and multidisciplinary collaboration and careful communication regarding CKD diagnosis. Future studies are needed to establish the effectiveness of pharmacist MTM on slowing CKD progression and improvement in cardiovascular outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02208674 Registered August 1, 2014, first patient enrolled September 30, 2014.

Clinical Practice Patterns in IgA Nephropathy: A Global Questionnaire-Based Survey.

Introduction: IgA nephropathy (IgAN) displays ethnic differences in disease phenotype. We aimed to examine how this common disease is managed worldwide. Methods: An online 2-step questionnaire-based survey was conducted among nephrologists globally focusing on various management strategies used in IgAN. Results: A total of 422 nephrologists responded to the initial survey and 339 to the follow-up survey. Of the nephrologists, 13.7% do not get MEST-C scores in biopsy reports; 97.2% of nephrologists use renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) / angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) as initial treatment. Other supportive treatments commonly employed are fish oil (43.6%) and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (48.6%) with regional differences. Immunosuppression is generally (92.4%) initiated when proteinuria >1 g/d persists for ≥3 months.Main considerations for initiating immunosuppression are level of proteinuria (87.9%), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline (78.7%), lack of response to RAAS blockade (57.6%) and MEST-C score (64.9%). Corticosteroids (89.1%) are universally used as first-line immunosuppression; mycophenolate mofetil is commonly used in resistant patients (49.3%). Only 30.4% nephrologist enroll patients with persistent proteinuria >1 g/d in clinical trials. Nephrologists in Europe (63.6%), North America (56.5%), and Australia (63.6%) are more likely to do so compared to South America (31.3%) and Asia (17.2%). Only 8.1% nephrologists in lower-middle income countries (LMICs) enroll patients in clinical trials, though 40% of them are aware of such trials in their nations. Conclusion: Although most nephrologists agree on common parameters to assess clinical severity of IgAN, use of RAAS blockade, and blood pressure control, there is heterogeneity in use of other supportive therapies and initiation of immunosuppression. There is reluctance to enroll patients in clinical trials with novel treatments, principally in LMICs.

The Impact of Cholecaciferol Supplementation on Bone Mineral Density in Long-Term Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Although reduced bone mineral density (BMD) is associated with a higher risk of fractures, morbidity, and mortality in kidney transplant patients (KTRs), there is no consensus on optimal treatment for the alterations of BMD in this population. This study aims at assessing the effect of cholecalciferol supplementation on BMD over a follow-up period of 2 years in a cohort of long-term KTRs. Patients with age ≥ 18 years were included and divided into two subgroups based on treatment with bisphosphonate and/or calcimimetics and/or active vitamin D sterols (KTRs-treated) or never treated with the above medications (KTRs-free). BMD was evaluated at lumbar vertebral bodies (LV) and right femoral neck (FN) with standard DEXA at the beginning and end of the study. According to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, results were expressed as T-score and Z-score. Osteoporosis and osteopenia were defined as T score ≤ -2.5 SD and T score < -1 and >-2.5 SD, respectively. Cholecalciferol was supplemented at a dose of 25,000 IU/week over 12 weeks followed by 1500 IU/day. KTRs-free (n. 69) and KTRs-treated (n. 49) consecutive outpatients entered the study. KTRs-free were younger (p < 0.05), with a lower prevalence of diabetes (p < 0.05) and of osteopenia at FN (46.3 % vs. 61.2 %) compared to KTRs-treated. At the entry none of the study subjects had a sufficient level of cholecalciferol; Z-score and T-score at LV and FN were not different between groups. At the end of the study period, serum cholecalciferol concentration was significantly increased in both groups (p < 0.001); the KTRs-free group presented an improvement in both T-score and Z-score at LV (p < 0.05) as well as a lower prevalence of osteoporotic cases (21.7% vs. 15.9%); in contrast, no changes were recorded in KTR-treated individuals. In conclusion, supplementation with cholecalciferol ameliorated Z-score and T-score at LV in long-term KTRs who had been never treated with active or inactive vitamin D sterols, bisphosphonates, and calcimimetics. Future endeavours are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.

Bone Mineral Density Changes in Long-Term Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Real-Life Cohort Study of Native Vitamin D Supplementation.

Vitamin D insufficiency has been associated with reduced bone mineral density (BMD) in kidney transplant patients (KTRs). However, the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation on BMD remains poorly defined, especially for long-term KTRs. We aimed to investigate the effect of native vitamin D supplementation on the BMD of KTRs during a 2-year follow-up. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected. BMD was evaluated with standard DEXA that was performed at baseline (before vitamin D supplementation) and at the end of study period. BMD was assessed at lumbar vertebral bodies (LV) and right femoral neck (FN) by a single operator. According to WHO criteria, results were expressed as the T-score (standard deviation (SD) relative to young healthy adults) and Z-score (SD relative to age-matched controls). Osteoporosis and osteopenia were defined as a T-score ≤ -2.5 SD and a T-score < -1 and a > -2.5 SD, respectively. Based on plasma levels, 25-OH-vitamin D (25-OH-D) was supplemented as recommended for the general population. Data from 100 KTRs were analyzed. The mean study period was 27.7 ± 3.4 months. At study inception, 25-OH-D insufficiency and deficiency were recorded in 65 and 35 patients. At the basal DEXA, the percentage of osteopenia and osteoporosis was 43.3% and 18.6% at LV and 54.1% and 12.2% at FN, respectively. At the end of the study, no differences in the Z-score and T-score gains were observed. During linear mixed model analysis, native vitamin D supplementation was found to have a negative nitration with Z-score changes at the right femoral neck in KTRs (p < 0.05). The mean dose of administered cholecalciferol was 13.396 ± 7.537 UI per week; increased 25-OH-D levels were found (p < 0.0001). Either low BMD or 25-OH-vitamin D concentration was observed in long-term KTRs. Prolonged supplementation with 25-OH-D did not modify BMD, Z-score, or T-score.

Self-reported Financial Conflict of Interest in Nephrology Clinical Practice Guidelines.

INTRODUCTION: There is ongoing controversy concerning the potential influence of industry and financial conflict of interest (FCOI) in the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). The influence of industry in renal guideline development has been discussed in the past with emphasis on the National Kidney foundation (NKF) and Kidney and Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines. In this study we evaluate the self-reported FCOI among guideline panel members in Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CPGs. METHODS: We examined 10 of the most recent KDIGO CPGs developed between 2009 and 2018. Using disclosure lists, we catalogued FCOIs for panelists for each individual CPG. The categories were Advisor/Consultant, Honoraria, Travel Stipend, Grant/Research Support, Speaker, Equity Interest, Employee, Board of Trustees, Royalties, Advisory Board, Employment, Ownership, Data Monitoring Committee, Expert Testimony, and Development of Education Materials. We also reviewed FCOIs for members of evidence review team (ERT). We also catalogued the company involved in each disclosure. One conflict describes 1 instance of participation of an individual in 1 category in each guideline. "Company" describes a commercial, industry, or institute affiliation reported in each episode. RESULTS: One hundred two (66.4%) of the total 151 panelists reported FCOI. A total of 662 conflicts were disclosed. Being a consultant or advisor was the most common category. One hundred fifty-one companies were associated with FCOI disclosure. One company was most frequently reported, involving 60 (9%) of 662 conflicts. Of the 52 members in the ERT, there was 1 instance of FCOI. CONCLUSION: FCOI is prevalent in KDIGO guidelines with almost two thirds of the panelists self-reporting FCOI. The evidence review team had only 1 instance of FCOI.

Physicians' Recognition and Management of Kidney Disease: A Randomized Vignette Study Evaluating the Impact of the KDIGO 2012 CKD Classification System.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: The Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (KDOQI) and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) chronic kidney disease (CKD) classification systems published in 2002 and 2012, respectively, are recommended worldwide and based on strong epidemiologic data. However, their impact on CKD recognition and management is not well evaluated in clinical practice, and we therefore investigated whether they help physicians recognize and appropriately care for patients with CKD. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized vignette experiment with fractional factorial design based on 6 kidney-related scenarios and 3 laboratory presentation methods reflecting the CKD guidelines. Participants evaluated 1 of 3 subsets of the 18 vignettes (ie, 6 vignettes each with 4 answer alternatives). SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 249 interns, general practitioners, and residents/fellows attending postgraduate meetings and courses in Norway and the United States. INTERVENTION: Kidney-related results (serum creatinine level and urinary albumin excretion) were presented as the "minimal data" (high/low levels), KDOQI-2002 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] reported automatically), or KDIGO-2012 (eGFR + albuminuria categorization + risk for complications) laboratory report. OUTCOME: CKD management choice by physicians. RESULTS: When kidney laboratory data were presented as the KDOQI-2002 report (automatic eGFR calculation), there was a significantly higher odds for correct patient management decisions compared with the minimal data report (OR, 1.57; P < 0.001). Additional significant improvement was obtained with the KDIGO-2012 report (OR, 2.28 for correct answer vs minimal data report [P < 0.001]; OR, 1.45 compared to KDOQI-2002 report [P = 0.005]). The KDIGO classification system improved physician management in 4 of the 6 clinical scenarios covering a wide range of kidney-related topics. Interaction analysis showed that general practitioners and those with 1 to 3 years of internal medicine experience had the greatest improvements with the new presentation techniques. LIMITATIONS: Physicians' management was evaluated by theoretical scenarios rather than direct patient care. CONCLUSIONS: Automatic GFR estimation, albuminuria categorization, and notification of the associated risk for complications improve most physicians` recognition and management of a wide range of CKD clinical scenarios.

Acute Kidney Injury Following Cardiothoracic Surgery.

This article reviews acute kidney injury following cardiothoracic surgery, addressing the full spectrum of the perioperative environment including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors for acute kidney injury. Topics discussed include pathophysiology, risk prediction scoring, diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and new directions for research.

Prevention of acute kidney injury.

Acute kidney injury is a prevalent but underdiagnosed complication that is associated with increased in-hospital morbidity and mortality. The importance of this complication is being increasingly recognized. The lack of timely diagnostic methods and effective preemptive and therapeutic strategies make its perioperative management challenging. To reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury, it is crucial to focus the resources on high-risk patients who can be identified by clinical scoring systems with a high predictive value and newly developed renal biomarkers. The 'Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes' guidelines recommend the implementation of preventive strategies that include a bundle of supportive measures. However, clear evidence to support such an approach is lacking. Previous studies demonstrated improved patients' outcome following remote ischemic preconditioning in high-risk patients. Other studies reached an opposite result. To date, renal replacement therapy is the "gold standard" for the treatment of severe acute kidney injury, although the ideal timing, technique, and application of this therapy remain under debate.

Prevention of cardiac surgery-associated AKI by implementing the KDIGO guidelines in high risk patients identified by biomarkers: the PrevAKI randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Care bundles are recommended in patients at high risk for acute kidney injury (AKI), although they have not been proven to improve outcomes. We sought to establish the efficacy of an implementation of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines to prevent cardiac surgery-associated AKI in high risk patients defined by renal biomarkers. METHODS: In this single-center trial, we examined the effect of a "KDIGO bundle" consisting of optimization of volume status and hemodynamics, avoidance of nephrotoxic drugs, and preventing hyperglycemia in high risk patients defined as urinary [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7] > 0.3 undergoing cardiac surgery. The primary endpoint was the rate of AKI defined by KDIGO criteria within the first 72 h after surgery. Secondary endpoints included AKI severity, need for dialysis, length of stay, and major adverse kidney events (MAKE) at days 30, 60, and 90. RESULTS: AKI was significantly reduced with the intervention compared to controls [55.1 vs. 71.7%; ARR 16.6% (95 CI 5.5-27.9%); p = 0.004]. The implementation of the bundle resulted in significantly improved hemodynamic parameters at different time points (p < 0.05), less hyperglycemia (p < 0.001) and use of ACEi/ARBs (p < 0.001) compared to controls. Rates of moderate to severe AKI were also significantly reduced by the intervention compared to controls. There were no significant effects on other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: An implementation of the KDIGO guidelines compared with standard care reduced the frequency and severity of AKI after cardiac surgery in high risk patients. Adequately powered multicenter trials are warranted to examine mortality and long-term renal outcomes.

The Evidence-Based Approach to Adult-Onset Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome.

Adult-onset nephrotic syndrome (NS) differs from its pediatric counterpart in several important ways. Most importantly, NS in adults is more etiologically heterogeneous compared to children, and thus treatment approaches rely heavily on the histological diagnosis provided by renal biopsy. The evidence-based approach to treatment of adult NS has been critically examined by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines in glomerulonephritis, published in 2012. Here, we examine the strengths and limits of those guidelines and review recent work that expands the evidence-based approach.

¿podemos hablar hoy de un valor de fósforo como indicador de la calidad del tratamiento dialítico? / Can we speak today of a phosphorus value as an indicator of dialysis treatment quality?

Introducción: El trastorno del metabolismo óseo y mineral constituye una grave complicación de la insuficiencia renal crónica. Respecto al fósforo, las nuevas Guías KDIGO sugieren disminuir la hiperfosfatemia, sin recomendar un valor determinado. Sin embargo, en Argentina se utiliza como indicador de calidad dialítica (IndCalDial) un valor de fósforo igual o inferior a 5 mg/dL. Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar si dicho objetivo es actualmente válido como IndCalDial. Material y métodos: Estudio multicéntrico, de corte transversal. Se incluyeron pacientes mayores de 18 años, con más de 90 días en hemodiálisis. Se tabularon datos demográficos y de laboratorio, comparándose normofosfatémicos contra hiperfosfatémicos. Según el método, en 3 centros el límite superior de referencia fue 4.5 mg/dL y en cuatro 5.6 mg/dL, éstos últimos se analizaron como grupo separado F 5.6. Resultados: Se incluyeron 333 pacientes. Edad, sexo, porcentaje FAV, diabéticos, tiempo en diálisis, Kt/V, Hemoglobina y Albumina, fueron semejantes a los datos del registro. La mediana de fosfatemia fue 5.2 mg/dL, (rango: 2.3 a 10.6). Los pacientes hiperfosfatémicos presentaron menor edad, menos tiempo en diálisis y cifras mayores de hemoglobina y Albumina. En el grupo F 5.6 (n = 203), según KDIGO sólo el 33.7 % necesitaría tratamiento. De aplicarse el IndCalDial (fósforo menor a 5 mg/dL), el porcentaje sería de 55%, es decir, un 21.3% de pacientes normofosfatémicos deberían ser tratados. Conclusiones: Debería estandarizarse la determinación de fosfatemia, previo a utilizar un valor fijo como IndCalDial.

Introduction: Bone and mineral metabolism disorder is a serious complication of Chronic Kidney Disease. Concerning phosphorus, the new KDIGO Guidelines suggest a reduction of hyperphosphatemia, but they do not recommend a specific value. However, in Argentina, a phosphorus value of 5 mg/dL or less is used as a dialysis quality indicator (DiaQualInd). Our objective was to evaluate whether this goal is currently valid as a DiaQualInd. Methods: A multicentric, cross-sectional study was conducted. Patients older than 18 were included, with more than 90 days undergoing hemodialysis. Demographic and laboratory data were tabulated, comparing normophosphatemic with hyperphosphatemic values. According to this method, in 3 centers the upper reference limit was 4.5 mg/dL and in 4 centers it was 5.6 mg/dL. The latter were analyzed as a separate group (F 5.6). Results: There were 333 patients included in this study. Age, sex, AVF percentage, diabetes, time on dialysis, Kt/V, hemoglobin and albumin were similar to the registry data. The median phosphatemia was 5.2 mg/dL, (range: 2.3 to 10.6). The hyperphosphatemic patients were the youngest, spent less time on dialysis and showed higher hemoglobin and albumin values. In group F 5.6 (n = 203), according to KDIGO only 33.7% would need treatment. If this DiaQualInd were to be applied (phosphorus lower than 5 mg/dL), the percentage would be 55%, that is, 21.3% of normophosphatemic patients should be treated. Conclusions: Phosphatemia determination should be standardized before using a fixed value such as DiaQualInd