Germinal center responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in healthy and immunocompromised individuals.

Vaccine-mediated immunity often relies on the generation of protective antibodies and memory B cells, which commonly stem from germinal center (GC) reactions. An in-depth comparison of the GC responses elicited by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in healthy and immunocompromised individuals has not yet been performed due to the challenge of directly probing human lymph nodes. Herein, through a fine-needle aspiration-based approach, we profiled the immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in lymph nodes of healthy individuals and kidney transplant recipients (KTXs). We found that, unlike healthy subjects, KTXs presented deeply blunted SARS-CoV-2-specific GC B cell responses coupled with severely hindered T follicular helper cell, SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain-specific memory B cell, and neutralizing antibody responses. KTXs also displayed reduced SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4 and CD8 T cell frequencies. Broadly, these data indicate impaired GC-derived immunity in immunocompromised individuals and suggest a GC origin for certain humoral and memory B cell responses following mRNA vaccination.

Incidence and clearance of cervical and anal high-risk human papillomavirus in kidney transplant recipients: Results from a Danish prospective clinical study.

This study investigates the incidence and clearance of cervical and anal high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) compared to immunocompetent controls. During 2016-2017, we enrolled 125 female KTRs and 125 female controls. Liquid-based cervical and anal cytology samples collected at enrollment and follow-up were tested for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA using the CLART HPV2 test. All participants answered a questionnaire on lifestyle and sexual behavior at both examinations. KTRs had an increased age-adjusted risk of incident cervical hrHPV infection compared to controls (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.6, 95% CI = 1.2-11.2). Probability of cervical hrHPV clearance at 18 months was lower among KTRs (8.3%) than controls (66.7%). There was no statistically significant difference in anal hrHPV incidence between KTRs and controls (HR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.4-2.0). Clearance of anal hrHPV was similar between KTRs and controls at 18 months. During the total follow-up, a lower anal hrHPV clearance, although not statistically significant, was observed among KTRs (HR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.06-1.2). KTRs had higher incidence of cervical hrHPV and lower probability of clearance, especially of cervical hrHPV infections, than controls. Our findings support that KTRs are at increased risk of HPV infection and point to the need for targeted HPV prevention strategies, such as cervical cancer screening.

A prospective humoral immune monitoring study of kidney transplant recipients receiving three doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine.

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), like other solid organ transplant recipients display a suboptimal response to mRNA vaccines, with only about half achieving seroconversion after two doses. However, the effectiveness of a booster dose, particularly in generating neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), remains poorly understood, as most studies have mainly focused on non-neutralizing antibodies. Here, we have longitudinally assessed the humoral response to the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in 40 KTRs over a year, examining changes in both anti-spike IgG and NAbs following a booster dose administered about 5 months post-second dose. We found a significant humoral response increase 5 months post-booster, a stark contrast to the attenuated response observed after the second dose. Of note, nearly a quarter of participants did not achieve protective plasma levels even after the booster dose. We also found that the higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) correlated with a more robust humoral response postvaccination. Altogether, these findings underscore the effectiveness of the booster dose in enhancing durable humoral immunity in KTRs, as evidenced by the protective level of NAbs found in 65% of the patients 5 months post- booster, especially those with higher eGFR rates.

Creatine homeostasis and the kidney: comparison between kidney transplant recipients and healthy controls.

Creatine is a natural nitrogenous organic acid that is integral to energy metabolism and crucial for proper cell functioning. The kidneys are involved in the first step of creatine production. With kidney transplantation being the gold-standard treatment for end-stage kidney disease, kidney transplant recipients (KTR) may be at risk of impaired creatine synthesis. We aimed to compare creatine homeostasis between KTR and controls. Plasma and urine concentrations of arginine, glycine, guanidinoacetate, creatine and creatinine were measured in 553 KTR and 168 healthy controls. Creatine intake was assessed using food frequency questionnaires. Iothalamate-measured GFR data were available in subsets of 157 KTR and 167 controls. KTR and controls had comparable body weight, height and creatine intake (all P > 0.05). However, the total creatine pool was 14% lower in KTR as compared to controls (651 ± 178 vs. 753 ± 239 mmol, P < 0.001). The endogenous creatine synthesis rate was 22% lower in KTR as compared to controls (7.8 ± 3.0 vs. 10.0 ± 4.1 mmol per day, P < 0.001). Despite lower GFR, the plasma guanidinoacetate and creatine concentrations were 21% and 41% lower in KTR as compared to controls (both P < 0.001). Urinary excretion of guanidinoacetate and creatine were 66% and 59% lower in KTR as compared to controls (both P < 0.001). In KTR, but not in controls, a higher measured GFR was associated with a higher endogenous creatine synthesis rate (std. beta: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.08; 0.33; P = 0.002), as well as a higher total creatine pool (std. beta: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.11; 0.33; P < 0.001). These associations were fully mediated (93% and 95%; P < 0.001) by urinary guanidinoacetate excretion which is consistent with production of the creatine precursor guanidinoacetate as rate-limiting factor. Our findings highlight that KTR have a disturbed creatine homeostasis as compared to controls. Given the direct relationship of measured GFR with endogenous creatine synthesis rate and the total creatine pool, creatine supplementation might be beneficial in KTR with low kidney function.Trial registration ID: NCT02811835.Trial registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02811835 .

Prevalence of cervical human papillomavirus in kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the prevalence of cervical high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and, furthermore to compare it to that in immunocompetent controls. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from January 2000 to February 2023, to identify studies investigating the prevalence of cervical hrHPV in KTRs. Pooled cervical hrHPV prevalences, odds ratios (ORs) comparing KTRs to controls and corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random effects logistic regression models. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed through the I2 statistic, and the significance was evaluated by the Cochrane's Q test. RESULTS: Altogether, 16 studies covering >1200 KTRs were included. The prevalence of cervical hrHPV in KTRs was 27.7% (95% CI 21.3-35.1) with substantial interstudy heterogeneity. Stratification indicated a higher prevalence in recent years (2019-2023) and in Asia (39% (95% CI 11.2-61.4)). The prevalence of HPV16 and HPV18 in KTRs was 8.0% (95% CI 3.9-15.9) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.8-3.7), respectively. Comparing hrHPV prevalence in KTRs and controls based on six studies including >500 KTRs and 1000 controls, the OR for hrHPV was 2.0 (95% CI 1.1-3.6). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis establishes an increased cervical hrHPV prevalence in KTRs compared to controls. The increased risk may be associated with immunosuppressive therapy post-transplantation. Further research is needed to explore the potential benefits of HPV vaccination, including potential revaccination strategies in KTRs.

Sapovirus: an emerging pathogen in kidney transplant recipients?

PURPOSE: Diarrhea is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. After including sapovirus to the viral gastroenteritis screening of our institution's laboratory, we noticed an increase in sapovirus infections among kidney transplant recipients. Therefore, we assumed former gastrointestinal tract infections with unidentified pathogens could have been caused by sapovirus. To better understand the characteristics of a sapovirus infection in a high-risk group we initiated this study. METHODS: Over a period of 6 months, all transplant recipients with diarrhea and later identified viral/unknown pathogens were included. Kidney function, levels of immunosuppressants and  c-reactive protein, acid-base balance, onset of symptoms and time of hospitalization were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 13 hospitalized kidney transplant recipients sapovirus was detected in four patients, while in the remaining nine, three were diagnosed with norovirus, one with cytomegalovirus, one with inflammatory bowel disease and in four patients no pathogen was identified. Even though statistically not significant, creatinine levels at admission tended to be higher in sapovirus patients (median: sapovirus: 3.3 mg/dl (1.3; 5.0), non-sapovirus: 2.5 mg/dl (1.1; 4.9), p = 0.710). Also, Tacrolimus levels showed the same trend (sapovirus: 13.6 ng/ml (12.9; 13.6), non-sapovirus: 7.1 ng/ml (2.6; 22.6), p = 0.279). On discharge creatinine levels improved equally in both groups (sapovirus: 1.7 mg/dl (1.4; 3.2), non-sapovirus: 2 mg/dl (1.0; 3.6), p = 0.825). CONCLUSION: In high-risk patients, early symptomatic treatment remains crucial to protect the transplant`s function. In our cohort all patients recovered well. Larger cohorts and longer follow-up times are needed to detect the long-term consequences and a potential need for further research regarding specific treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study has been registered on DRKS (trialsearch.who.int), Reg. Nr. DRKS00033311 (December 28th 2023).

Risk factors and multi-pathogen infections in kidney transplant recipients with omicron variant pneumonia: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at an elevated risk of progressing to severe infections upon contracting COVID-19. We conducted a study on risk factors and multi-pathogen infections in KTRs with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. METHODS: KTRs were subjected to a thorough etiological evaluation. Whenever feasible, they were also provided with bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage to enable metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), ideally within a 48-hour window post-admission. We performed a retrospective analysis for pathogens and risk factors of KTRs with the COVID-19 virus variant Omicron. RESULTS: We included thirty patients in our study, with sixteen exhibiting single infection of COVID-19 and fourteen experiencing co-infections, predominantly with Pneumocystis jirovecii. Notably, patients with severe cases demonstrated significantly elevated levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 compared to those with moderate cases (P < 0.05). Furthermore, individuals whose conditions progressed had markedly higher baseline serum creatinine levels than those without such progression (P < 0.05). The presence of heart failure, acute exacerbation of renal dysfunction, and a history of opportunistic infections were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of deterioration and hospital admission due to the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, as compared to the control group (P < 0.05). In subsequent follow-up analysis, the all-cause rehospitalization rate was observed to be 21.4%, with Pneumocystis jirovecii infection accounting for half of these cases. CONCLUSION: Among KTRs, a significant coinfection rate of 47% was observed, with Pneumocystis jirovecii emerging as the predominant pathogen in these cases. The development of heart failure, acute exacerbation of chronic renal dysfunction, and a prior history of opportunistic infections have been identified as potential risk factors that may contribute to clinical deterioration in KTRs. Additionally, Pneumocystis jirovecii infection has been established as a critical factor influencing the rate of all-cause rehospitalization within this patient population.

Physical Exercise in Kidney Renal Recipients: Where Have We Come?

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation constitutes the most effective therapeutic option for patients suffering from end-stage renal disease but remains burdened by a high incidence of cardiovascular disease. To date, exercise is an important preventive strategy that has been underestimated; in kidney transplant patients, exercise programs lead to an improvement in cardiorespiratory performance, muscle strength, arterial stiffness, and patients' quality of life perception. SUMMARY: The nephrology and transplant community have moved from generic suggestions to specific indications regarding frequency, intensity, time, type, volume, and progression of physical exercise both in the pre- and posttransplant phase. The latest guidelines from the World Health Organization for patients with chronic conditions propose a combination of aerobic, muscle-strengthening, and multicomponent exercises (e.g., balance) to improve health. Based on recent evidence, a combined exercise program (aerobic and strength exercise) is largely proposed to kidney transplant recipients. Aerobic exercise should be performed at an intensity >60% of theoretical maximum heart rate or maximum oxygen uptake possibly every day, and strength training should be performed at a >60% the estimate single maximum repetition, at least 2 times per week. KEY MESSAGES: Physical exercise should be personalized in relation to the patient's baseline performance; increases must be progressive and gradual. Regular physical activity should also be recommended to patients awaiting for a transplant. Eventually, organizational models based on a network of nephrology units, transplant centers, sports medicine centers, and fitness center or outdoor gym are essential elements for overcoming the logistical barriers for prescribing and carrying out regular physical activity.

Holistic care and symptom management for pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

While many aspects of life may improve substantially for children and young people undergoing kidney transplant, there may be new challenges including symptoms that can be detrimental to health-related quality of life. Addressing symptoms requires attention to patient and family perspectives and a holistic approach grounded in symptom management. The interdisciplinary pediatric nephrology transplant team should be attuned to the prevalence of common symptoms including fatigue, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, pain, and sleep disturbances, as well as poor body image and sexual health. These common symptoms require regular assessment with a focus on appropriate interventions and how care may be impacted by transplant status.

Management of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Sepsis: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Up to 6% of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) experience life-threatening complications requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and one of the most common medical complications requiring ICU admission is infection. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of immunosuppressive therapy (IST) modification on prognosis of KTRs with sepsis. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study in 4 university-affiliated hospitals to evaluate the effect of adjusting the IST in KTRs with sepsis. Only patients who either maintained IST after ICU admission or those who underwent immediate (within 24 h of ICU admission) reduction or withdrawal of IST following ICU admission were included in this study. "Any reduction" was defined as a dosage reduction of any IST or discontinuation of at least 1 IST. "Complete withdrawal of IST" was defined as concomitant discontinuation of all ISTs, except steroids. RESULTS: During the study period, 1596 of the KTRs were admitted to the ICU, and 112 episodes of sepsis or septic shock were identified. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 35.7%. In-hospital mortality was associated with higher sequential organ failure assessment score, simplified acute physiology score 3, non-identical human leukocyte antigen relation, presence of septic shock, and complete withdrawal of IST. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, complete withdrawal of IST remained significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted coefficient, 1.029; 95% confidence interval, 0.024-2.035) and graft failure (adjusted coefficient, 2.001; 95% confidence interval, 0.961-3.058). CONCLUSIONS: Complete IST withdrawal was common and associated with worse outcomes in critically ill KTRs with sepsis.

The comprehensive incidence and risk factors of fracture in kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis.

AIM: Kidney transplant recipients are at high risk of fracture due to many factors such as nutritional status, hyperparathyroidism, acidosis and steroid administration. The current meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively analyse the incidence and risk factors of fracture in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: A systematic search on Embase, Web of Science, PubMed and Cochrane Library until November 2023 was performed. RStudio software was used to analyse data. RESULTS: Twenty-eight eligible studies containing 310 530 kidney transplant recipients were included in the analysis. The pooled incidence of fracture was 10% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7%-13%) generally. When divided by regions, it was further observed that the pooled incidence of fracture was 13% (95% CI: 9%-17%) in Europe, 11% (95% CI: 6%-16%) in North America, 7% (95% CI: 3%-11%) in Asia. Regarding the risk factors, pooled analysis revealed that age of recipient (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.17-1.91), female sex (HR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.36-1.53), pretransplantation diabetes (HR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.58-1.97), pretransplantation fracture history (HR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.86-2.78), dialysis duration (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01-1.17) and deceased donor (HR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.05-1.39) related to higher risk of fracture. The general quality of included studies was acceptable, and no publication bias existed except for the analysis between age of recipient and fracture incidence; further trim and fill method indicated age of recipient showed a correlation trend with the fracture incidence without the statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The pooled incidence of fracture reaches 10% in kidney transplant recipients, which relates to age of recipient, female sex, pretransplantation diabetes or fracture history, dialysis duration and decease donor.

Assessing antiviral treatment efficacy and risk factors for severe COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients during the Omicron subvariant-dominant period: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and even now that Omicron subvariants have become dominant, cases of severe disease are certain to occur. The aims of this retrospective study were to evaluate the efficacy of antiviral treatment for COVID-19 and to identify risk factors for severe disease in KTRs during Omicron subvariant-dominant periods. METHODS: A total of 65 KTRs diagnosed with COVID-19 who received antiviral treatment between July 2022 and September 2023 were analyzed. Mild cases received oral molnupiravir (MP) as outpatient therapy, while moderate or worse cases received intravenous remdesivir (RDV) as inpatient therapy. In principle, mycophenolate mofetil was withdrawn and switched to everolimus. We investigated the efficacy of antiviral treatment and compared the clinical parameters of mild/moderate and severe/critical cases to identify risk factors for severe COVID-19. RESULTS: Among 65 cases, 49 were mild, 6 were moderate, 9 were severe, and 1 was of critical severity. MP was administered to 57 cases; 49 (86%) improved and 8 (14%) progressed. RDV was administered to 16 cases; 14 (87%) improved and 2 (13%) progressed. Seventeen (26%) cases required hospitalization, and none died. Comparisons of the severe/critical group (n = 10) with the mild/moderate group (n = 55) demonstrated that the severe/critical group had a significantly higher median age (64 vs. 53 years, respectively; p = 0.0252), prevalence of diabetes (70% vs. 22%, respectively; p = 0.0047) and overweight/obesity (40% vs. 11%, respectively; p = 0.0393), as well as a significantly longer median time from symptom onset to initial antiviral therapy (3 days vs. 1 day, respectively; p = 0.0026). Multivariate analysis showed that a longer time from symptom onset to initial antiviral treatment was an independent risk factor for severe COVID-19 (p = 0.0196, odds ratio 1.625, 95% confidence interval 1.081-2.441). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that a longer time from symptom onset to initial antiviral treatment is associated with a higher risk of severe COVID-19 in KTRs. Initiating antiviral treatment as early as possible is crucial for preventing severe outcomes; this represents a valuable insight into COVID-19 management in KTRs.

Clinical efficacy and safety of switching from eculizumab to ravulizumab in adult patients with aHUS- real-world data.

BACKGROUND: The complement factor 5 (C5)-inhibitor eculizumab has been established as standard-of-care for the treatment of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). In 2021, the long-acting C5-inhibitor ravulizumab was approved, extending intervals of intravenous treatment from two to eight weeks resulting in improvement of quality of life for patients and lowering direct and indirect therapy associated costs. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective data analysis of 32 adult patients with aHUS (including 10 kidney transplant recipients) treated with eculizumab for at least three months and switched to ravulizumab aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of switching medication in the real-world setting. Hematologic parameters, kidney function, concurrent therapy and aHUS associated events were evaluated three months before and until up to 12 months after switching to ravulizumab. RESULTS: Mean age (range) at ravulizumab initiation was 41 years (19-78 years) and 59% of the patients were female. Genetic analysis was available for all patients with 72% showing a pathogenic variant. Median time (range) on eculizumab before switching was 20 months (3-120 months). No new events of TMA or worsening of renal function were reported during up to 12 months of follow-up during ravulizumab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest, non-industry derived, multi-center retrospective analysis of adult patients with aHUS switching C5-inhibitor treatment from eculizumab to ravulizumab in the real-world setting. Switching to ravulizumab was safe and efficient resulting in sustained hematological stability and preservation of renal function.

Factors Associated With Vaccine-Induced T-Cell Immune Responses Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an important prophylactic measure in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), but the immune response is often impaired. Here, we examined the T-cell immune response against SARS-CoV-2 in 148 KTRs after 3 or 4 vaccine doses, including 35 KTRs with subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection. The frequency of spike-specific T cells was lower in KTRs than in immunocompetent controls and was correlated with the level of spike-specific antibodies. Positive predictors for detection of vaccine-induced T cells were detection of spike-specific antibodies, heterologous immunization with messenger RNA and a vector vaccine, and longer time after transplantation. In vaccinated KTRs with subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection, the T-cell response was greatly enhanced and was significantly higher than in vaccinated KTRs without SARS-CoV-2 infection. Overall, the data show a correlation between impaired humoral and T-cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and provide evidence for greater robustness of hybrid immunity in KTRs.

Scedosporium Infection in Recipients of Kidney Transplants from Deceased Near-Drowning Donor.

Scedosporium aurianticum infection developed in 2 recipients of kidney transplants in India, acquired from the same deceased near-drowning donor. Given the substantial risk for death associated with Scedosporium infection among solid-organ transplant recipients, safety protocols for organ transplantation from nearly drowned donors should be thoroughly revaluated and refined.

The role of interleukin-21 in COVID-19 vaccine-induced B cell-mediated immune responses in patients with kidney disease and kidney transplant recipients.

T-cell-mediated help to B cells is required for the development of humoral responses, in which the cytokine interleukin (IL)-21 is key. Here, we studied the mRNA-1273 vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2-specific memory T-cell IL-21 response, memory B cell response, and immunoglobulin (Ig)G antibody levels in peripheral blood at 28 days after the second vaccination by ELISpot and the fluorescent bead-based multiplex immunoassay, respectively. We included 40 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), 34 patients on dialysis, 63 kidney transplant recipients (KTR), and 47 controls. We found that KTR, but not patients with CKD and those receiving dialysis, showed a significantly lower number of SARS-CoV-2-specific IL-21 producing T cells than controls (P < .001). KTR and patients with CKD showed lower numbers of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG-producing memory B cells when compared with controls (P < .001 and P = .01, respectively). The T-cell IL-21 response was positively associated with the SARS-CoV-2-specific B cell response and the SARS-CoV-2 spike S1-specific IgG antibody levels (both Pearson r = 0.5; P < .001). In addition, SARS-CoV-2-specific B cell responses were shown to be IL-21 dependent. Taken together, we show that IL-21 signaling is important in eliciting robust B cell-mediated immune responses in patients with kidney disease and KTR.

ELISPOT assays with pp65 peptides or whole HCMV antigen are reliable predictors of immune control of HCMV infection in seropositive kidney transplant recipients.

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection represents a major complication for solid organ transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to verify if the measurement of HCMV-specific T-cells could help to identify patients protected against HCMV disease cytokine flow cytometry using infected dendritic cells as stimulus (CFC-iDC, which discriminates between CD4+ and CD8+ T cells), and ELISPOT, using infected cell lysate (ELISPOT-iCL) or pp65 (ELISPOT-pp65) as stimulus, were adopted. Among the 47 kidney transplant recipients (KTR) enrolled, 29 had a self-resolving HCMV infection (Controllers) and 18 required antiviral treatment (Non-Controllers). HCMV-specific T-cell frequency at the peak of HCMV infection identified Controllers and Non-Controllers, although the diagnostic performance of CD8+ CFC-iDC (area under the curve [AUC] of the receiver-operator characteristic curve: 0.65) was lower than that of CD4+ CFC-iDC (AUC: 0.83), ELISPOT-iCL (AUC: 0.83) and ELISPOT-pp65 (AUC: 0.80). CFC-iDC detected a protective immune reconstitution significantly earlier (median time: 38 days) than ELISPOT-iCL and ELISPOT-pp65 (median time: 126 and 133 days, respectively). Time to protective immune reconstitution in Non-Controllers was significantly longer than in Controllers with the ELISPOT and the CD4+ CFC-iDC assays, but not with CD8+ CFC-iDC. The majority of patients did not require antiviral treatment after protective immune reconstitution, with the exception of five patients according to CFC-iDC assay, one patient according to ELISPOT-iCL assay and three patients according to ELISPOT-pp65 assay. Monitoring the HCMV-specific immunological reconstitution with is effective in discriminating KTR at risk of or protected from HCMV disease and the ELISPOT assays are suitable for implementation in the clinical setting.

Iron deficiency and cognitive functioning in kidney transplant recipients: findings of the TransplantLines biobank and cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Neurocognitive impairment is common in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Adequate brain functioning requires energy and neurotransmitter activity, for which iron is essential. We aimed to investigate iron deficiency (ID) as a potentially modifiable risk factor for cognitive impairment in KTRs. METHODS: We analyzed stable KTRs participating in the TransplantLines Biobank and Cohort study. Participants underwent neuropsychological tests for memory, mental speed, and attention and executive functioning. ID was defined as ferritin <100 µg/mL or 100-299 µg/mL with transferrin saturation (TSAT) ≤20%. Associations between iron status and norm scores of neurocognitive outcomes, corrected for age, sex and education, were assessed using multivariable linear regression analyses adjusted for potential confounders including hemoglobin. RESULTS: We included 166 KTRs [median (IQR) age 57 (45-65) years, 59% male, estimated glomerular filtration rate 51±18 mL/min/1.73 m2]. Time since transplantation was 5.8 (1.0-12.0) years. Prevalence of ID was 65%. ID was independently associated with lower scores for mental speed (std.ß = -0.19, P = .02) and attention and executive functioning (std.ß = -0.19, P = .02), and tended to be associated with worse memory (std.ß = -0.16, P = .07). Lower plasma ferritin levels were associated with worse memory (std.ß = 0.23, P = .007), mental speed (std.ß = 0.34, P < .001), and attention and executive functioning (std.ß = 0.30, P = .001). Lower TSAT was associated with worse memory (std.ß = 0.19, P = .04) and mental speed (std.ß = 0.27, P = .003), and tended to be associated with worse attention and executive functioning (std.ß = 0.16, P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: Iron-deficient KTRs performed worse on neurocognitive tasks measuring memory, mental speed, and attention and executive functioning. These findings set the stage for prospective studies addressing whether ID correction restores cognitive function after kidney transplantation.

Dietary lithium intake, graft failure and mortality in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Long-term high-dose lithium therapy in bipolar disorder is known to adversely affect kidney function. However, recent animal studies have revealed that low amounts of lithium are beneficial for the kidney when it is damaged by exposure to nephrotoxic compounds, inflammation or oxidative stress. This study aimed to investigate whether urinary lithium excretion, reflecting dietary lithium intake, is associated with adverse long-term kidney graft outcomes and patient survival. METHODS: Urinary lithium concentration was measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry in 642 stable kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Graft failure was defined as the start of dialysis or retransplantation and kidney function decline was defined as a doubling of serum creatinine. RESULTS: The median urinary lithium excretion was 3.03 µmol/24 h [interquartile range (IQR) 2.31-4.01]. Urinary lithium excretion was associated with energy, plant protein and water intake. During a median follow-up of 5.3 years (IQR 4.5-6.0), 79 (12%) KTRs developed graft failure and 127 (20%) KTRs developed kidney function decline. Higher urinary lithium excretion was associated with a lower risk of graft failure {hazard ratio [HR] per doubling 0.54 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.79]} and kidney function decline [HR per doubling 0.73 (95% CI 0.54-0.99)]. These associations remained independent of adjustment for potential confounders and in sensitivity analyses. There was a significant effect modification with the use of proliferation inhibitors (P = .05) and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; P < .001), with higher urinary lithium excretion being more protective in KTRs not using proliferation inhibitors and in KTRs with lower baseline eGFR. Furthermore, higher urinary lithium excretion was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality [HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.49-0.83); P = .001]. CONCLUSION: Dietary lithium intake may be a potentially modifiable, yet rather overlooked, risk factor for adverse long-term kidney graft outcomes and patient survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02811835.

Statin therapy and the incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Statins are recommended in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) - a population with a high risk of major cardiovascular (CV) events. However, the literature data on the effectiveness of statins in KTRs are sparse and inconclusive. The present study's objective was to evaluate the association between statin exposure and atherosclerotic CV events in KTRs and the biochemical effectiveness of statins on the lipid profile. METHODS: 318 consecutive KTRs managed at a single center between 2006 and 2019 were retrospectively included. Those exposed to statins after transplantation were incident users. In all users, statins were indicated for primary CV prevention. Lipid profiles, the occurrence of any atherosclerotic CV events (stroke, myocardial infarction, other atherosclerotic CV events, and atherosclerotic CV deaths) were documented comprehensively. We applied Cox models that included statin exposure as a time-dependent covariate fitted with time-varying inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) to assess the effectiveness of statins on atherosclerotic CV events and on all CV events. We built linear mixed models to assess the biochemical effectiveness of statins. RESULTS: During a median [interquartile range] follow-up period of 6.0 [3.9-10.0] years, 27 atherosclerotic CV events occurred in 26 patients. In the Cox models fitted with time-varying IPTW, exposure to statins was not associated with a decrease in atherosclerotic CV events; the hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] was 1.16 [0.53-2.53] (p=0.700). In the linear mixed models, statin exposure was associated with significant decrease over time in triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations (p < 0.001). These results were consistent when stratified for the intensity of statin therapy. CONCLUSION: Even though the lipid profile improved, statin exposure was not associated with a decrease in CV events in this real-life, single-center, retrospective, long-term follow-up study of a KTR cohort. Larger, controlled studies are needed to confirm or refute these results.