Clinical problems encountered in the treatment of adolescents with anorexia nervosa.

The conceptualization of anorexia nervosa (AN) depends on the diagnostic criteria. Most patients with teenage onset AN seem to remit within 3-10 years depending on the definitions of recovery. The mortality of adolescent onset anorexia nervosa (AN) has fortunately decreased over the last two decades. Based on randomized controlled trials, we review different treatments including individual and group psychotherapy, family therapy, psychopharmacology, and hormone therapy. Treatment settings vary over time for any individual patient. Despite high rates of inpatient treatment, the respective evidence for effectiveness is meager. In underage patients with severe AN clinical, ethical and legal aspects need to be dealt with systematically if intermittent compulsory treatment is deemed necessary. The prolonged and frequently chronic course of AN often entails therapeutic discontinuity; the transition into adulthood requires a graded therapeutic concept that considers the severity of the disorder, developmental and chronological age, and parental involvement. Finally, we consider future clinical and research options to improve treatment and outcome of this eating disorder.

[What is a public health intervention? Results of a Delphi process in German-speaking countries]. / Was wird unter einer Public-Health-Intervention verstanden? Ergebnisse eines Delphi-Prozesses im deutschsprachigen Raum.

BACKGROUND: Internationally, a variety of definitions for public health interventions (PHI) exist. In the German-speaking countries, however, a definition is still outstanding. Therefore, the aim of this study was to derive consensus criteria for the definition of PHI from the expert perspective of science and practice. METHODS: A Delphi survey with two online rounds was conducted from December 2022 to February 2023. Six criteria were formulated by a working group and posed for consensus: 1) the intention of the intervention, 2) potential conflicts of interest of the initiators of the intervention, 3) primary vs. secondary/tertiary prevention, 4) costs, 5) targeting, and 6) the reach of the intervention. In both Delphi rounds, experts from academia and practice were recruited through relevant networks and associations throughout the German-speaking world. The judgments were asked about standardized rating scales with the possibility of open justification. RESULTS: In the first Delphi round, n = 52 and in the second round n = 43 experts from research, care and administration/management in health care participated. Consensus was reached on four of the six criteria after the second Delphi round: the intention of the intervention, possible conflicts of interest of the initiators of the intervention, primary vs. secondary/tertiary prevention, and the scope of the intervention. From the perspective of the experts interviewed, these are the criteria that distinguish PHI. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Based on the consensus criteria, PHI can be defined more concretely. Thus, the results contribute to a better inter- and transdisciplinary understanding. Ideally, the criteria will make it easier to assign interventions to the public health sector in the future, even if a precise examination will be necessary in individual cases, among other things because the experts disagreed on the criteria of costs and how to address the target group.

Developing an Instrument to Evaluate Undergraduate Healthcare Students' Professionalism.

Professionalism is a multidimensional quality acquired over time. Undergraduate years lay a foundation for the development of professionalism. Tools monitoring the students' professional development are needed. Our tool development followed three phases: 1) identifying meaningful criteria for professionalism adapted to the education level, 2) developing an evaluation instrument in a process maximising construct validity, 3) testing the evaluation instrument in an interprofessional study. The evaluation instrument proved to be applicable in the field and it meets validity standards. Some differences between professions were found and discussed. Professionality starts to develop during the education, and early monitoring is important to support students' optimal development. The evaluation instrument supports both self- and expert evaluation of healthcare students' professional development.

[Survey on the use of antibiotics in exotic pets among Swiss veterinarians]. / Umfrage bei Schweizer Tierärzte/-innen über den Einsatz von Antibiotika bei exotischen Heimtieren.

INTRODUCTION: Monitoring programs and guidelines on the use of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in human and veterinary medicine have been developed worldwide to promote the prudent use of antibiotics in recent years. However, such information on the use of antibiotics in exotic pets is absent. This fact must be taken into account, since the number of exotic pet patients is constantly increasing and the administration of antibiotics is particular challenging due to the diversity of species and the differences in physiology. The present study reports the results of a survey of frequently used antibiotics and the criteria of antibiotic usage in exotic pets (rabbits, rodents, birds and reptiles) among Swiss veterinarians. These data should form the basis for the development of antibiotic usage guidelines in exotic pets. A total of 61 veterinarians returned the questionnaire. The most important decision-making criteria for antibiotic treatment and antibiotic selection were clinical symptoms (55/59, 93% for antibiotic treatment and 40/59, 68% for antibiotic selection), experience (41/59, 69% and 36/59, 61%, respectively) and textbooks (39/59, 66% and 40/59, 68%). The most important decision-making criteria for dosage and duration of therapy were textbooks (59/59, 100%) and experience (31/59, 53%). The use of a microbial culture was used as a decision criterion for both antibiotic treatment and antibiotic selection by 39% of the participants, sensitivity testing was chosen as a decision criterion by 37% for antibiotic treatment and by 46% for antibiotic selection. Fluoroquinolones were used most frequently, 46/56 (82% of the participants) for rabbits, 49/57 (86%) for rodents, 36/37 (97%) for reptiles and 38/46 (83%) for birds. The vast majority of veterinarians (57/58, 98%) would consult a guide for the use of antibiotics. The frequent use of critical antibiotics in exotic pets underscores the need for a guide to the prudent use of antibiotics. The positive influence of such guidelines has already been proven in dogs and cats.

INTRODUCTION: Pour promouvoir une utilisation prudente des antibiotiques, des programmes de surveillance et des lignes directrices sur l'utilisation des antibiotiques et la résistance aux antibiotiques en médecine humaine et vétérinaire ont été élaborés dans le monde entier ces dernières années. Cependant, il n'existe actuellement aucune information de ce type en ce qui concerne les nouveaux animaux de compagnie ainsi que des informations exhaustives sur l'utilisation d'antibiotiques dans la pratique vétérinaire. Ce fait doit être pris en compte, d'autant plus que le nombre d'nouveaux animaux de compagnie est en constante augmentation dans la patientèle et que l'administration d'antibiotiques est un défi particulier en raison de la diversité des espèces et des différences de physiologie. Dans la présente étude, une enquête a été menée pour avoir un aperçu des antibiotiques fréquemment utilisés et de leurs critères d'utilisation chez les nouveaux animaux de compagnie (lapins, rongeurs, oiseaux et reptiles) auprès de vétérinaires suisses. Ces données sont destinées à servir de base à l'élaboration d'un guide sur les antibiotiques pour les animaux exotiques. Au total 61 vétérinaires ont répondu au questionnaire. Les critères de décision les plus importants pour le traitement antibiotique et la sélection d'un antibiotique étaient les symptômes (55/59, 93% pour le traitement antibiotique et 40/59, 68% pour la sélection de l'antibiotique), l'expérience (41/59, 69% et 36/59, 61%, respectivement) et la littérature spécialisée (39/59, 66% et 40/59, 68%). Les critères de décision les plus importants pour e dosage et la durée du traitement étaient la littérature spécialisée (59/59, 100%) et l'expérience (31/59, 53%). L'utilisation d'une culture bactériologique a été donnée par 39% des participants comme critère de décision à la fois pour le traitement antibiotique et le choix de l'antibiotique et un antibiogramme a été choisi par 37% comme critère de décision pour le traitement antibiotique et 46% pour le choix de l'antibiotique. Il a été constaté que les fluoroquinolones sont utilisées le plus fréquemment, chez 46/56 (82% des participants) pour les lapins, 49/57 (86%) pour les rongeurs, 36/37 (97%) pour les reptiles et 38/46 (83%) pour les oiseaux. La grande majorité des vétérinaires (57/58, 98%) a déclaré qu'ils consulteraient un guide pour l'utilisation des antibiotiques. L'utilisation fréquente d'antibiotiques critiques chez les nouveaux animaux de compagnie souligne la nécessité d'un guide sur l'utilisation prudente des antibiotiques. L'influence positive de ces recommandations a déjà été prouvée pour les chiens et les chats.

[Reporting and information system for significant events related to radiation exposures in medicine: Structure, responsibilities and reporting criteria]. / Melde- und Informationssystem für bedeutsame Vorkommnisse bei Strahlenanwendungen in der Medizin: Struktur, Zuständigkeiten und Meldekriterien.

The increasing frequency and complexity of medical radiation exposures to humans inevitably result in higher risks of harmful unintended or accidental radiation exposures. To ensure a high level of protection and its continuous improvement, the Directive 2013/59/Euratom thus requires to systematically record and analyze both events and near-miss events as well as, in the case of their significance, to disseminate information regarding lessons learned from these events promptly and nationwide to improve radiation protection in medicine. These requirements have been transposed into German legislation by the new radiation protection law and radiation protection ordinance that entered into force simultaneously on December 31th, 2018. The reporting and information system as provided by these regulations as well as the tasks, duties and powers of the parties involved are presented in the first part of this review article. In the second part, the established application-specified criteria for the significance - and thus the notification requirement - of (near-miss) events are itemized and explicated.

[Measuring quality of life: as simple as possible and as detailed as necessary]. / Messung von Lebensqualität: So einfach wie möglich, so differenziert wie nötig.

Numerous instruments for measuring health-related quality of life have been developed over the past decades. Explicit methodological criteria should be used to select an instrument to use in a given study. Based on a list of such methodological criteria, this paper provides guidance for choosing appropriate quality of life instruments. Special emphasis will be given to the advantages and disadvantages of using generic and disease-specific instruments as these are the main types of quality of life measures. Finally, the development and the use of short forms of existing instruments will be discussed.