Feasibility and Effectiveness of Hysteroscopic Suture Fixation of the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System in the Treatment of Adenomyosis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of hysteroscopic suture fixation of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) for the treatment of adenomyosis. DESIGN: A retrospective case series. SETTING: Two teaching hospitals with the technology of hysteroscopic suture fixation of the LNG-IUS. PATIENTS: The study reviewed 79 adenomyosis patients who received the hysteroscopic suture fixation of the LNG-IUS from January 2021 to May 2022. INTERVENTION: Hysteroscopic suture fixation of the LNG-IUS to the posterior uterine wall with nondissolvable suture. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All patients underwent one-year postoperative follow-up to evaluate the LNG-IUS expulsion rate, postoperative efficacy, and side effects. Two patients (2.6%) experienced expulsion of the LNG-IUS at 8 months and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. The visual analog pain scale, pictorial blood loss assessment chart score and carbohydrate antigen 125 markedly decreased after the suture fixation of the LNG-IUS compared with baseline in all patients (p <.001). Hemoglobin increased significantly (p <.001). The most common side effect was irregular bleeding, which accounted for 44.3%. The second common side effect was weight gain, which accounted for 29.2%. The composite effectiveness based on pain and bleeding showed that the effective treatment rates at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery were 92.4%, 97.4%, 96.2%, and 97.4% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hysteroscopic suture fixation of the LNG-IUS to the uterine fundus was associated with low expulsion rates and significantly improved dysmenorrhea and bleeding.

Long-term efficacy and safety of levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of adenomyosis: evidence mapping.

PURPOSE: To summarize evidence on levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in the treatment of adenomyosis (AM) and to identify potential research gaps. METHODS: Search was conducted in MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CBM, CNKI, and Wanfang. We included studies investigating patients with AM treated with LNG-IUS combined with conservative therapy. RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies compared LNG-IUS with other conservative therapeutic drugs. The most common comparison was GnRH-a + LNG-IUS vs. LNG-IUS alone, followed by LNG-IUS vs. mifepristone, expected treatment, and GnRH-a. GnRH-a + LNG-IUS was more beneficial in reducing the intensity of dysmenorrhea than LNG-IUS alone at the 6-month follow-up in patients with an enlarged uterus and moderate to severe dysmenorrhea. Large and well-designed studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of LNG-IUS and GnRH-a on reducing uterine volume at 6-month follow-up. Thirty-two studies investigated LNG-IUS as the postoperative management. The most common comparison was surgical excision + LNG-IUS vs. surgical excision. Results showed VAS scores were lower in the surgical excision + LNG-IUS group than in the surgical excision group at the 1-year follow-up. Evidence on endometrial thickness, quality of life, adverse events and beneficial effect at 3 and 5 years are needed. CONCLUSIONS: Combined GnRH-a and LNG-IUS treatment was more efficacious than LNG-IUS alone for patients with an enlarged uterus and moderate to severe dysmenorrhea. Moreover, LNG-IUS seemed to show potential long-term benefits in postoperative therapy, warranting further meta-analysis for confirmation.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) 52 mg versus other long-acting reversible contraceptives for contraception in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: Condoms and combined oral contraceptive pills are widely used in Spain with high failure rates. Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive (LARC) methods offer better efficacy and adherence and reduce unintended pregnancies (UP) compared with short-acting reversible contraceptive (SARC) methods. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of LNG-IUS 52 mg (Mirena®) versus other LARC for contraception in Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model with annual cycles and an eight-year time horizon was developed from the Spanish national healthcare system (NHS) perspective, considering costs for contraceptive method acquisition, health care resources (HCR) and UP. Effectiveness was based on failure and discontinuation rates. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the model's robustness. RESULTS: LNG-IUS 52 mg (Mirena®) resulted in lower costs and fewer UP versus LNG-IUS 13.5 mg (Jaydess®), Implant (Implanon®) and Copper IUD. LNG-IUS 52 mg (Levosert®) prevented the same UP events at a higher cost. LNG-IUS 19.5 mg (Kyleena®) was the most effective option, due to a lower discontinuation rate. CONCLUSIONS: LNG-IUS 52 mg (Mirena®) is the least costly LARC, driven by lower acquisition costs and reduced HCR utilisation. Increasing LNG-IUS 52 mg (Mirena®) uptake in contraception could generate further cost savings for the Spanish NHS and reduce economic burden of UP.

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS; Mirena^®) is an effective and cost-saving long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method compared with other similar methods in Spain over an eight-year time horizon, and Kyleena^® was the most effective option.

Efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with LNG-IUS for adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) combined with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) for adenomyosis. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, SinoMed, Wanfang, and VIP databases from their inception to Nov 20, 2021 for relevant articles that compared HIFU combined with LNG-IUS vs. HIFU alone in patients with adenomyosis. RevMan5.4 software was used for the data analysis. The primary outcome was changes in volume of the uterine. Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS) scores for dysmenorrhea, serum CA125 level, recurrence rate, changes in volume of the adenomyotic lesion, menstrual volume scores, and adverse reactions. Data synthesis was conducted using a random-effects model with significant heterogeneity (I2 > 50%), and using a fixed-effects model otherwise. This study is registered on the PROSPERO platform (CRD42021295214). RESULTS: The final analysis included 13 studies, with a total of 1861 patients. Results of analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in uterine volume reduction between the HIFU control group and the HIFU/LNG-IUS group at 3 months after procedure (MD:30.63). Compared with the HIFU control group, the HIFU/LNG-IUS group had more pronounced reduction in uterine volume at 6 (MD:29.04) and 12 months (MD:22.10) after procedure. The HIFU/LNG-IUS group has lower VAS scores for dysmenorrhea than the HIFU control group at 3 (MD:1.68), 6 (MD:1.69), and 12 months (MD:1.30) after procedure. Serum CA125 level in the HIFU/LNG-IUS group decreased more significantly than the HIFU control group at 6 (MD:18.34) and 12 months (MD:18.49) after procedure. The recurrence rate in the HIFU/LNG-IUS group was lower than that in the HIFU control group (RR:0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to HIFU control group, HIFU/LNG-IUS group for the management of adenomyosis had more advantages in alleviating symptoms and decreasing the volumes of the uterine and adenomyotic lesions. However, since the number of the included studies was too small and some of them were not RCT, this conclusion needs to be referenced with caution.

Assessment of pain and ease of intrauterine device placement according to type of device, parity, and mode of delivery.

OBJECTIVE: We compared pain and the ease of insertion of two different types of intrauterine devices (IUDs; the levonorgestrel intrauterine systems 52 mg (LNG-IUS 52 mg) and the copper-bearing IUD [TCu380A]) among nulligravidas and parous women with and without caesarean delivery. METHODS: A cross-sectional study assessed pain referred by women and ease of insertion of the two IUDs models. We applied a visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess pain, while the ease of insertion was defined by healthcare professionals. RESULTS: We assessed 1076 women, including 334 nulligravidas and 566 parous women who had had at least one caesarean delivery and 176 women with history of only vaginal delivery. Regarding pain at IUD placement, 26 (2.5%) women reported no pain, 167 (16.4%) light pain, 319 (31.3%) moderate and 506 (49.7%) intense pain. The highest scores for pain were reported by nulligravidas (67.2%, p = 0.001), while the mean pain score was higher in the LNG-IUS 52 mg group. Difficulties reported by healthcare providers were more frequent in the nulligravidas (21.2%) and women with previous caesarean delivery (16.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested differences between the two IUDs tested, with higher pain associated with the LNG-IUS 52 mg, and highlights the need for pain management, mainly among nulligravida and women with history of caesarean delivery.SHORT CONDENSATIONIntense pain at insertion was more related to nulligravida than parous women and more pain with placement of LNG-IUS 52 mg IUDs than TCu380A IUDs. Nevertheless, our results confirmed that ease of IUD placement was between 80% to 90% of all insertions, being more common in parous women without previous caesarean delivery.

Effectiveness, safety and overall satisfaction of early postpartum placement of hormonal IUD compared with standard procedure: An open-label, randomized, multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION: In this open-label, randomized controlled, non-inferiority, multicenter study we aimed to study the risk of termination of pregnancy within 1 year postpartum, the safety profile and patient acceptability after early postpartum insertion of a hormonal intrauterine device (LNG-IUS, Mirena®) compared with standard placement 6-8 weeks postpartum. MATERIAL AND METHODS: April 2018 to January 2020 women with uncomplicated vaginal delivery at four urban birth centers in Sweden, were randomized to either early placement within 48 h after delivery (early group) or standard placement 6-8 weeks postpartum (standard group) of a hormonal intrauterine device. The main outcome measure was the proportion of terminations of pregnancies in each group during the first year after placement of the intrauterine device. Registration EudraCT database no. 2017-001945-29. RESULTS: The study was prematurely stopped according to the protocol due to an expulsion rate >20% in the early group. No pregnancies occurred. Fifty-two women were randomized to early and 49 women to standard insertion. In the early group, 23/52 (44.2%) of the intrauterine devices were expelled. After expulsion, 10 women chose to have another hormonal intrauterine device placed but still significantly fewer women (39/52, 75%, p = 0.22) in the early group used the hormonal intrauterine device method at study completion. No expulsions occurred in the standard group, but 5/49 (10.2%) requested removal and 41/49 (83.7%, p = 0.22) had used the hormonal intrauterine device method continuously for 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Early hormonal intrauterine device insertion after vaginal delivery is associated with high expulsion rates. Despite this, a high continuation rate of the hormonal intrauterine device method is seen among women once choosing the method. In the light of high continuation rates, the advantages of early insertion could balance the risk of expulsion for well-informed women.

Introducing the hormonal Intrauterine Device in Madagascar, Nigeria, and Zambia: results from a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The hormonal Intrauterine Device (IUD) is a highly effective contraceptive option growing in popularity and availability in many countries. The hormonal IUD has been shown to have high rates of satisfaction and continuation among users in high-income countries. The study aims to understand the profiles of clients who choose the hormonal IUD in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and describe their continuation and satisfaction with the method after 12 months of use. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study of hormonal IUD acceptors was conducted across three countries-Madagascar, Nigeria, and Zambia-where the hormonal IUD had been introduced in a pilot setting within the of a broad mix of available methods. Women were interviewed at baseline immediately following their voluntary hormonal IUD insertion, and again 3 and 12 months following provision of the method. A descriptive analysis of user characteristics and satisfaction with the method was conducted on an analytic sample of women who completed baseline, 3-month, and 12-month follow-up questionnaires. Kaplan-Meier time-to-event models were used to estimate the cumulative probability of method continuation rates up to 12 months post-insertion. RESULTS: Each country had a unique demographic profile of hormonal IUD users with different method-use histories. Across all three countries, women reported high rates of satisfaction with the hormonal IUD (67-100%) and high rates of continuation at the 12-month mark (82-90%). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of satisfaction and continuation among hormonal IUD users in the study suggest that expanding method choice with the hormonal IUD would provide a highly effective, long-acting method desirable to many different population segments, including those with high unmet need.

Levonorgestrel intrauterine system for the treatment of intermenstrual spotting in patients with previous cesarean delivery scar defect.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system for intermenstrual bleeding in patients with previous cesarean delivery scar defects (PCDSs). METHODS: The medical records of 28 consecutive patients with previous cesarean delivery scar defect and intermenstrual bleeding who had undergone conservative treatment with levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system were reviewed. The efficacy of treatment and frequency of adverse events were measured retrospectively. RESULTS: After 1 year of treatment, 22 patients (78.6%) reported an improvement in symptoms. The mean duration of menstruation were 18 and 5 days before and after treatment, respectively. No uterine perforations or pelvic inflammatory diseases occurred during or after the insertion procedures. Eighteen (64.3%) patients did not experience any adverse events, and the patients with adverse events reported that they could be managed by adjusting their medications or observation. CONCLUSION: Levonorgestrel intrauterine system may have a role in the safe and effective management of intermenstrual spotting in patients with PCDSs.

Role of hysteroscopy during conservative management of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and early-stage endometrial cancer in patients who desire pregnancy.

Twenty-five percent of cases of endometrial cancer appear in women with unfulfilled reproductive desires. An adequate selection of patients and a close hysteroscopic follow-up to monitor the endometrial response to the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) may be a valid and safe option for these patients. This is a case series and review of the literature study. We included eight patients diagnosed of complex endometrial hyperplasia with atypia (CEHA) or stage 1AG1 well-differentiated endometrial cancer without myometrial invasion who desired to get pregnant and opted for a conservative treatment. Follow-up was performed with hysteroscopy and directed biopsy at 3, 6 and 12 months. Of the 854 cases of complex endometrial hyperplasia with atypia (CEHA)/endometrial cancer were diagnosed, 2.3% were candidates for conservative management. We obtained a favourable regression of 71.2% at 6 months and 57% at one year with hormonal treatment. Conservative treatment in complex endometrial hyperplasia with atypia (CEHA)/low-grade endometrial cancer in reproductive age patients with a strong desire for pregnancy is feasible.

Hysteroscopic management of endometrial polyps and submucous leiomyomas in women using a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

INTRODUCTION: This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of hysteroscopy in the management of symptoms related to endometrial polyps and submucous leiomyomas in women using a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-three LNG-IUS users presenting with endometrial polyps and/or submucous leiomyomas and irregular uterine bleeding were recruited for hysteroscopic examination and surgery. Intrauterine pathology was investigated and treated by hysteroscopic resection with the LNG-IUS in situ, and the effect of the procedure on symptoms was evaluated after three to six months. RESULTS: Intrauterine pathology was successfully resected by hysteroscopy in 23 (100.0%) out of 23 cases. Following hysteroscopy, 18 (78.3%) women reported amenorrhea, one (4.3%) regular spotting, three (13.0%) irregular spotting and one (4.3%) patient resumed normal menstrual cycle. We conclude that 19 (82.6%) patients were postoperatively asymptomatic. All procedures were uncomplicated and 4 (17.4%) were carried out without general anesthesia as office procedures. CONCLUSION: Endometrial polyps and submucous leiomyomas can develop in LNG-IUS users, and this can cause irregular uterine bleeding. Hysteroscopic resection of these pathologies is a feasible method in the clinical management of symptoms.

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus oral medroxyprogesterone acetate in infertile women with endometrial hyperplasia without atypia.

RESEARCH QUESTION: How does use of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in infertile women with endometrial hyperplasia without atypia affect endometrial hyperplasia regression and pregnancy rates compared with oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA)? DESIGN: This prospective cohort study included 215 infertile women with an indication for assisted reproductive technology (ART) and a diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. Endometrial hyperplasia was diagnosed by hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy. At the time of first- and second-line treatment, patients were offered therapy with either oral MPA 10 mg daily or LNG-IUS. Follow-up biopsies were scheduled after 90 days' treatment. After endometrial hyperplasia regression, patients were admitted to IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics and confounders including age at diagnosis, body mass index and duration of infertility did not differ between LNG-IUS users and control participants and were accounted for using propensity score weighting. Endometrial hyperplasia regression rate at first follow-up was higher in the LNG-IUS group than the oral progestins group (28/28, 100% and 110/187, 58.8%; P < 0.001), while that after second-line treatment was comparable between the two groups (89/91, 97.8% and 122/124, 98.4%; P = 0.22). Clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and cumulative live birth rate following ART in patients ever receiving LNG-IUS were similar to those of patients receiving only MPA (34% versus 39.5%, 22.6% versus 34.7% and 26.4% versus 25.8%). CONCLUSION: Endometrial hyperplasia regression is greater in women receiving LNG-IUS compared with oral MPA, while live birth rates following ART are comparable between the two groups. The use of LNG-IUS does not jeopardize the chances of pregnancy in women seeking fertility treatment.

Ultrasound-guided transvaginal radiofrequency ablation combined with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for symptomatic uterine adenomyosis treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of transvaginal ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) for the treatment of symptomatic uterine adenomyosis. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic uterine adenomyosis treated with ultrasound-guided RFA in combined with an LNG-IUS from January 2013 to January 2016 and followed up for 3 years after treatment were selected. Assessment endpoints included the uterine volume reduction rate, dysmenorrheal score, symptom severity score and adverse events. RESULTS: Among the 72 patients, 64 completed the 3-year follow-up evaluations after treatment. No LNG-IUS expulsion was reported. Dysmenorrhea and symptom severity scores statistically significantly declined after the combined treatment of RFA and LNG-IUS was administered. The uterine volume significantly decreased, and the average reduction rate was 55%. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided RFA combined with an LNG-IUS might be a simple, safe and effective alternative for the treatment of symptomatic adenomyosis.

Clinical evaluation of HIFU combined with GnRH-a and LNG-IUS for adenomyosis patients who failed to respond to drug therapies: two-year follow-up results.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effect of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in the treatment of adenomyosis patients who failed to respond to drug therapies. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 47 patients with adenomyosis who had failed to respond to drug therapies and had no fertility desires were treated with HIFU combined with GnRH-a and LNG-IUS. The score of dysmenorrhea and menstrual volume were measured at pre and 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-month post-HIFU. RESULTS: All patients completed HIFU ablation without major postoperative complications. Compared with the symptom scores before the HIFU treatment, the score of dysmenorrhea and menstrual volume decreased significantly at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after HIFU treatment (p < 0.05), but no significant difference was observed between 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after HIFU (p > 0.05). The clinical success rate was 100%, 100%, 95.7% and 93.6% respectively at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after the combined treatment. CONCLUSION: The combined therapeutic regimen of HIFU, GnRH-a and LNS-IUS is safe and effective, which can be an alternative treatment option for patients with adenomyosis who failed to respond to drug therapies to avoid adenomyomectomy or hysterectomy.

Predictive Accuracy of Progesterone Receptor B in Young Women with Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Early Endometrial Cancer Treated with Hysteroscopic Resection plus LNG-IUD Insertion.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The immunohistochemical expression of isoform B of the progesterone receptor (PRB) has shown promising results in predicting the response of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and early endometrial cancer (EEC) to conservative treatment. We aimed to calculate the accuracy of PRB as a predictive marker of conservative treatment outcome in AEH or EEC. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. PATIENTS: Thirty-six consecutive premenopausal women <45 years of age with AEH (n = 29) or EEC (n = 7) conservatively treated from January 2007 to June 2018 were retrospectively assessed. INTERVENTIONS: All patients had been treated with hysteroscopic resection plus levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device insertion and followed for at least 1 year. The immunohistochemical expression of PRB was separately assessed in the glands and stroma of the lesion and dichotomized as "weak" or "normal." MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: The treatment outcomes considered were (1) treatment failure (i.e., a combined outcome including no regression or recurrence); (2) no regression; and (3) recurrence. The predictive accuracy of PRB immunohistochemistry was assessed by calculating sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A weak glandular PRB expression showed SE = 70%, SP = 77%, and AUC = 0.74 for treatment failure; SE = 66.7%, SP = 70%, and AUC = 0.68 for no regression; and SE = 75%, SP = 68.8%, and AUC = 0.72 for recurrence. A weak stromal PRB expression showed SE = 100%, SP = 53.8%, and AUC = 0.77 for treatment failure; SE = 100%, SP = 46.7%, and AUC = 0.73 for no regression; and SE = 100%, SP = 43.8%, and AUC = 0.72 for recurrence. CONCLUSION: A weak stromal PRB expression is a highly sensitive predictive marker of both no response and recurrence of AEH and EEC conservatively treated.

Pain scores at the insertion of the 52 MG levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system among nulligravidas and parous women.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the pain scores at the insertion of the 52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) among nulligravidas, parous women with previous vaginal delivery and parous women with elective caesarean-delivery without any previous labour or cervix dilation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present research is a prospective, single-cohort study that included 413 women aged 15-49 years who opted for LNG-IUS placement for contraception or treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding. Women who participated in the present study were not submitted to any pharmacological pain-relieving intervention to perform the procedure. Pain at insertion was evaluated by using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Pain was classified as absent (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10). The women were divided as: (1) nulligravidas, (2) parous women with a previous vaginal delivery, or (3) parous women with elective caesarean-delivery without any previous labour or cervix dilation. RESULTS: Nulligravidas women presented a higher mean pain score, when compared to women with elective caesarean-delivery and women with previous vaginal delivery (6.6 ± 2.0 vs 5.5 ± 2.1 and 3.9 ± 2.4, respectively; p < 0.001). Nulligravidas and women with elective caesarean-delivery were more likely to have pain classified as moderate or severe (in relation to absent or mild) than women with previous vaginal delivery (p < 0.001). Multiple Linear Regression Analysis demonstrated that 29.5% of all variability of the pain score was explained by two predictor/independent variables: nulligravidas or women with elective caesarean and difficulty at IUD insertion. CONCLUSIONS: Women with previous vaginal delivery had lower pain scores at LNG-IUS insertion when compared to nulligravidas and women with elective caesarean-delivery without any previous labour.

Comparison of two levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding: a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system Donasert® (also known as Levosert®) compared with the reference product Mirena® for the alleviation of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phase 3 multicentre, non-inferiority, active-controlled study in non-menopausal women with HMB (menstrual blood loss [MBL] ≥ 80 mL) as the primary symptom randomised to either Donasert® or Mirena® and followed for 6 months. MBL was evaluated using a validated, modified version of the Wyatt pictogram. RESULTS: Overall, 312 were randomised (158 to Donasert® and 154 to Mirena®). The mean (standard deviation) absolute change in MBL from baseline to 6 months in the per-protocol population (N = 300) was -130 (71.8) mL and -127 (67.3) mL in the Donasert® and Mirena® groups, respectively; non-inferiority of Donasert® was confirmed (p-value <0.0001). Successful treatment of HMB (MBL <80 mL) and a decrease to ≤50% of baseline MBL was achieved in 139/154 (90.3%) and 126/146 (86.3%) participants in the Donasert® and Mirena® groups, respectively and the between-treatment difference was non-significant. Most adverse events were mild in severity. Only two device expulsions occurred in the study and there were no uterine perforations. CONCLUSIONS: Donasert® has equivalent efficacy and safety during the first 6 months foralleviation of HMB compared to the reference device, Mirena®. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 348 (Clinical Trials Registry of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, http://grls.rosminzdrav.ru/default.aspx).

The effect of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device on female sexual function.

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) on the sexual function of women. Participants who had abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) complaints with LNG-IUSs were included (study registration: Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, 2018/10/34). The demographic data of all participants were recorded. The female sexual function index (FSFI) questionnaire was used to participants before the insertion of LNG-IUSs and 6 months after its insertion. FSFI scores were calculated at both timepoints and were compared. The total FSFI score after LNG-IUS insertion was significantly higher than the total FSFI score application (p < .001). The scores of the desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction and pain categories significantly increased after LNG-IUS compared to those before LNG-IUS. As a result, the present study demonstrated that after LNG-IUS insertion, these women had higher FSFI scores.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? There are many publications in the literature comparing the effects of LNG-IUSs, IUSs, OCs and other contraceptive methods on female sexuality. However, there are markedly few studies that compare sexual function before and after LNG-IUS insertion.What do the results of this study add? The total FSFI score after LNG-IUS insertion was significantly higher than the total FSFI score before the insertion (p < .001). The scores of the desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction and pain categories significantly increased after LNG-IUS insertion compared to those before the application. The number of participants with FSFI scores ≥26.5 before LNG-IUS insertion was 17 (12.5%), and this number increased to 71 (52.5%) after the applicationWhat are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This study contributes to the literature because there are few researches that compare sexual function before and after LNG-IUS insertion. As a result of our study, sexual dysfunction decreased after LNG-IUS, and the scores increased in all sub-groups together with the total FSFI scores.

A controlled clinical trial comparing potent progestins, LNG-IUS and dienogest, for the treatment of women with adenomyosis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of two progestins, levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and dienogest (DNG), for adenomyosis. METHODS: This study enrolled 157 women with adenomyosis, randomized to either LNG-IUS (n = 76) or DNG (n = 81) groups as a controlled clinical trial for 72 months. Participants were classified by three different localizations of adenomyosis: diffuse, focal, and extrinsic. VAS (Visual analog scale) score, days, and amount of uterine bleeding were assessed. Uterine volume or bone mineral density (BMD) were measured by three-dimensional ultrasonography or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: LNG-IUS and DNG comparably reduced pain scores in patients with adenomyosis. With regard to pain control, DNG offered greater efficacy than LNG-IUS in 3 months of treatment. In all types of adenomyosis, the days of bleeding after 12 months with DNG were significantly decreased compared to those with LNG-IUS. The decrease of whole uterine body was transient in any subtypes. A comparable decrease in BMD due to age-related changes in both groups was observed. CONCLUSIONS: LNG-IUS and DNG could be useful for long-term management of adenomyosis. In terms of durations of uterine bleeding, DNG was superior to LNG-IUS for 6 years.

What is the best drug treatment for premenopausal women with bleeding irregularities using the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system? A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Up to 60% of women discontinue using the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) within 5 years because of bleeding irregularities, pain and/or systemic progestogenic adverse effects. The aim of the study was to assess treatment options for bleeding irregularities in women using the 52 mg LNG-IUS. METHODS: Database searches of Medline, Embase/Ovid and the Cochrane Library were carried out, and journals were searched by hand, for relevant studies published from database inception to March 2020. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), prospective cohort studies and case-control studies of premenopausal women using the LNG-IUS and receiving medical treatment for bleeding irregularities. Screening, data extraction and quality assessment of retrieved articles were carried out independently by two pairs of reviewers. The primary outcome was the reduction of bleeding/spotting days. RESULTS: Of the 3061 studies identified, eight met our inclusion criteria: six RCTs and two prospective cohort studies. The eight studies enrolled a total of 677 women who were treated with tamoxifen, mifepristone, ulipristal acetate, naproxen, oestradiol, mefenamic acid, tranexamic acid or the progesterone receptor modulator CDB 2914. The results of our analysis indicated that naproxen may be effective for the prophylactic treatment of bleeding immediately (<12 weeks) after LNG-IUS insertion (high level of evidence). Oestradiol may be effective in treating ongoing bleeding irregularities >6 months after insertion (low level of evidence). CONCLUSION: Evidence for the medical treatment of (ongoing) bleeding irregularities during use of the LNG-IUS is lacking and more research is needed on the topic.

Ovarian reserve markers in women using various hormonal contraceptives.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess whether the ovarian reserve markers anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) were lower among women using the progestin-only pill (POP) or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and similar to the decrease observed in combined oral contraceptive (COC) pill users.Methods: This retrospective study comprised 565 hormonal contraceptive users (COC, POP, LNG-IUS or contraceptive vaginal ring) and 983 non-hormonal contraceptive users, who were seen in two Danish fertility assessment and counselling clinics between 2015 and 2019. Adjusted multiple regression analysis was used to examine the differences in AMH and AFC between hormonal and non-hormonal contraceptive users.Results: Compared with non-hormonal contraceptive users, AMH was 31.1% lower among COC users [95% confidence interval (CI) -39.6%, -25.9%; p < 0.001], 35.6% lower among POP users (95% CI -49.0%, -18.6%; p < 0.001) and 17.1% lower among LNG-IUS users (95% CI -31.4%, 0.002%; p = 0.052); no significant differences were seen among vaginal ring users. Compared with non-hormonal contraceptive users, AFC was 31.3% lower among COC users (95% CI -35.0%, -25.3%; p < 0.001) and 29.7% lower among POP users (-39.1%, -17.9%; p < 0.001); no significant differences were seen among LNG-IUS or vaginal ring users. Ovarian volume was more than 50% reduced among COC and vaginal ring users (p < 0.001) but was unchanged among POP and LNG-IUS users.Conclusion: Assessment of ovarian reserve markers among users of all types of hormonal contraception should be interpreted cautiously and the type of contraceptive method considered.