Giant Cell Arteritis after COVID-19 Vaccination with Long-Term Follow-Up: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a chronic vasculitis that primarily affects the elderly, and can cause visual impairment, requiring prompt diagnosis and treatment. The global impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been substantial. Although vaccination programs have been a key defense strategy, concerns have arisen regarding post-vaccination immune-mediated disorders and related risks. We present a case of GCA after COVID-19 vaccination with 2 years of follow-up. A 69-year-old woman experienced fever, headaches, and local muscle pain two days after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Elevated inflammatory markers were observed, and positron emission tomography (PET) revealed abnormal uptake in the major arteries, including the aorta and subclavian and iliac arteries. Temporal artery biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of GCA. Treatment consisted of pulse therapy with methylprednisolone, followed by prednisolone (PSL) and tocilizumab. Immediately after the initiation of treatment, the fever and headaches disappeared, and the inflammation markers normalized. The PSL dosage was gradually reduced, and one year later, a PET scan showed that the inflammation had resolved. After two years, the PSL dosage was reduced to 3 mg. Fourteen reported cases of GCA after COVID-19 vaccination was reviewed to reveal a diverse clinical picture and treatment response. The time from onset of symptoms to GCA diagnosis varied from two weeks to four months, highlighting the challenge of early detection. The effectiveness of treatment varied, but was generally effective similarly to that of conventional GCA. This report emphasizes the need for clinical vigilance and encourages further data collection in post-vaccination GCA cases.

Clinical Features and Outcomes of Japanese Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis: A Comparison with Takayasu Arteritis.

BACKGROUND: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TA) are distinct types of large-vessel vasculitis; however, the clinical features of the diseases have some similarities. Limited data are available regarding Japanese patients with GCA and TA. The present study aimed to compare the clinical features and outcomes of Japanese patients with GCA and TA and the effects of large vessel involvement (LVI). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of the patients with GCA (n = 15) and TA (n = 30) who visited our department from April 2012 to June 2022. Signs and symptoms attributed to the disease, treatment, clinical outcomes, and mortality were recorded using a standardized database. RESULTS: The median age of onset was significantly higher in the GCA group at 24 years (range, 16-72 years) in the TA group and 77 years (range, 57-89 years) in the GCA group (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in survival rates or the cumulative rates of cardiovascular events between the GCA and TA groups. However, relapse-free survival rates were significantly higher in patients with GCA than in patients with TA. Seven of the 15 patients with GCA had large vessel involvement, which did not affect the survival rates. Prednisolone (PSL) doses were significantly decreased after induction therapy in both groups, and the rates of achieving steroid tapering (PSL < 5.0 mg/day) were significantly higher in patients with GCA compared with those in patients with TA. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated no significant difference in the survival rates of Japanese patients with GCA and TA. The relapse-free survival rates were significantly higher in the GCA group than in the TA group. LVI may not be associated with disease relapse or survival rate in Japanese patients with GCA.