RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The lithotripsy efficiency (LE) in vitro study requires artificial or human stone samples (AS, HS). With the development of dusting lithotripsy, less ex vivo HS are available. We aimed to compare Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) and Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG)'s LE and define the most accurate LE parameter. METHODS: Hard and soft homogenous- and heterogenous-AS (Ho-AS, He-AS) were made to reproduce calcium-oxalate monohydrate and uric acid stones, respectively by a rapid or slow brewing of BegostonePlus (Bego) and distilled water. One hundred and fifty and 272µm-laser fibers, connected to 50W-TFL and 30W-HoYAG generators, compared three settings for TFL (FD: 0.15J/100Hz; D: 0.5J/30Hz; Fr: 1J/15Hz) and two for Ho:YAG (D-Fr). An experimental setup consisted in immerged 10mm cubic stone phantoms with a 20 seconds' lasing spiral, in contact mode, repeated four times. Stones were dried, weighted and µ-scanned (ablation weight and volume [AW and AV]). RESULTS: With He-AS, dusting AV were four- and three-fold higher with TFL compared to Ho:YAG against hard and soft (P<0.05). In fragmentation, AV were two-fold higher with TFL compared to Ho:YAG against hard (P<0.05) and soft (P<0.05). Experiments with Ho-AS were associated with non-significant differences when comparing TFL-150µm and TFL-272µm. The ablation weight-volume correlation coefficients was higher with Ho-AS than with He-AS (P<0.0001), and with hard than soft AS. If the LE can be estimated by the AW with hard AS, this approximation is not consistent for soft AS. CONCLUSION: TFL presented higher ablation rates than Ho:YAG, significant with He-AS. If the AW is acceptable and less expensive for hard Ho-AS, AV are more accurate for He-AS, which are suggested to imitate closely HS.
Assuntos
Lasers de Estado Sólido , Litotripsia a Laser , Cálculos Urinários , Humanos , Túlio , Hólmio , Cálculos Urinários/cirurgia , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Refinements in endoscopic instrumentation, the widespread popularization of endourology and the minimal invasiveness of endoscopic approaches have led to evolving interest in expanding applications for their use and now include incision of posterior urethral valves (PUV). We aimed to report our paediatric experience of PUV incision with Holmium:YAG laser updating of the endoscopic technique, how we set parameters for the laser energy and provide some tips and tricks to increase the likelihood of completing treatment. METHODS: A monocentric, prospective, continuous series of boys with PUV were treated endoscopically using a Holmium: YAG laser (1.2 J, 20 Hz, 800 µs). Feasibility was evaluated using operative time in minutes, spontaneous normal micturition after bladder catheter removal, and the duration of bladder catheterization in days in the absence of satisfactory micturition. Peri-operative complications were recorded. A VCUG was performed at 6 weeks postoperatively to exclude residual valves. RESULTS: Since September 2018, 18 children with PUV were included. The median age at the time of endoscopic laser incision was 12 days (1 day-5 years). The median operative duration was 28 min (17-35). The urinary catheter was systematically removed on the first postoperative day. There were no intraoperative or anaesthesia-related complications. More specifically, no urethral injuries and no bleeding were recorded. No incomplete VUP incision was found on follow-up VCUG, and no endoscopic revision was necessary thus far, with a median follow-up of 44 months (6 months-60 months). DISCUSSION: The use of the Holmium: YAG laser introduces new perspectives in the treatment of PUV. Its mechanism of action is considered a photothermic effect with a vapourization effect. The laser energy released by the Holmium: YAG source has a short tissue penetration distance and is strongly absorbed in an aqueous environment and therefore limits thermal tissue damage and favours early tissue re-epithelialization, reducing the risk of urethral stricture and decreasing postoperative oedema. The use of the laser in "incision" mode is the setting that most solicits the capacities of the laser (high energy, high frequency, and long pulse). The use of laser energy has the advantage of allowing tissue vapourization while ensuring maximal haemostasis and the possibility of introducing the laser fibre through the working channels of small, 6-Fr paediatric endoscopes. CONCLUSION: In our experience, endoscopic PUV incision using the Holmium: YAG laser appears to be a safe and efficient technique.
Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Obstrução Uretral , Criança , Hólmio , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Obstrução Uretral/etiologia , Obstrução Uretral/cirurgiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: To the best of our knowledge, no pediatric paper has been published regarding specifically how to set the Holmium:YAG laser for multiple urologic applications. OBJECTIVE: To provide insight into the laser parameters for pediatric applications. STUDY DESIGN: We describe the principle and the settings of the laser. RESULTS: The Holmium:YAG laser can produce four different biological effects: (1) fragmentation of stones in small fragments that can be retrieved with grasping instruments, thereby increasing the immediate stone-free outcome. For fragmentation lithotripsy, the laser has to be set with a high energy, low frequency and short pulse duration; (2) dusting which produces fine dust that can spontaneously evacuate, avoiding the use of basket retrieval. The dusting setting requires low energy, high frequency and long pulse duration; (3) incision of posterior urethral valves or ureterocele when all settings are maximized: high energy, high frequency and long pulse duration; (4) coagulation of urothelial tumors using high frequency, long pulse duration and slightly lower energy than required for incision. DISCUSSION: Both dusting by painting and fragmentation with retrieval for ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy are effective. Although dusting tends to be associated with shorter operative times and a lower risk of ureteral trauma, this approach has a potential risk of recurrent stone formation from dust failing to pass. In contrast, fragmentation with extraction may provide for a more immediate postoperative stone-free result. Altering the pulse energy, frequency, width and modulation can help to optimize lithotripsy efficiency. Lower pulse energy settings result in smaller fragments, less retropulsion and reduce fiber tip degradation. A shallow depth of penetration in water and tissue allows precise energy application and provides a margin of safety. CONCLUSION: An understanding of Ho-YAG laser settings will permit the pediatric surgeon to make a better use of the device for different urological applications.