The value of LCI-based modified Kyoto classification risk scoring system in predicting the risk of early gastric cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To study and compare the value of the Kyoto classification risk scoring system and the modified Kyoto classification risk scoring system based on linked color imaging (LCI) in predicting the risk of early gastric cancer. METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients with pathologically confirmed non-cardia early gastric cancer by endoscopic LCI and 150 non-gastric cancer patients matched for age and gender were included. Basic patient data and whole gastric endoscopic images under LCI were collected, and the images were scored according to the LCI-based Kyoto classification risk scoring system and the LCI-based modified Kyoto classification risk scoring system. RESULTS: Compared with the LCI-based Kyoto classification risk scoring system, the LCI-based modified Kyoto classification risk scoring system had a higher AUC for predicting the risk of early gastric cancer (0.723 vs. 0.784, p = 0.023), with a score of ≥3 being the best cutoff value for predicting the risk of early gastric cancer (sensitivity 61.33%, specificity 86.00%), and scores of 3 to 5 were significantly associated with early gastric carcinogenesis significantly (OR = 9.032, 95% CI: 4.995-16.330, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the LCI-based Kyoto classification risk scoring system, the LCI-based Kyoto modified classification risk scoring system has a better value for predicting the risk of early gastric cancer, and the score of 3 to 5 is a high-risk factor for the risk of early gastric cancer development, which is more strongly correlated with the risk of early gastric cancer.

Linked Color Imaging with Artificial Intelligence Improves the Detection of Early Gastric Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy is the most important tool to detect gastric cancer (GC). In this study, we developed a computer-aided detection (CADe) system to detect GC with white light imaging (WLI) and linked color imaging (LCI) modes and aimed to compare the performance of CADe with that of endoscopists. METHODS: The system was developed based on the deep learning framework from 9,021 images in 385 patients between 2017 and 2020. A total of 116 LCI and WLI videos from 110 patients between 2017 and 2023 were used to evaluate per-case sensitivity and per-frame specificity. RESULTS: The per-case sensitivity and per-frame specificity of CADe with a confidence level of 0.5 in detecting GC were 78.6% and 93.4% for WLI and 94.0% and 93.3% for LCI, respectively (p < 0.001). The per-case sensitivities of nonexpert endoscopists for WLI and LCI were 45.8% and 80.4%, whereas those of expert endoscopists were 66.7% and 90.6%, respectively. Regarding detectability between CADe and endoscopists, the per-case sensitivities for WLI and LCI were 78.6% and 94.0% in CADe, respectively, which were significantly higher than those for LCI in experts (90.6%, p = 0.004) and those for WLI and LCI in nonexperts (45.8% and 80.4%, respectively, p < 0.001); however, no significant difference for WLI was observed between CADe and experts (p = 0.134). CONCLUSIONS: Our CADe system showed significantly better sensitivity in detecting GC when used in LCI compared with WLI mode. Moreover, the sensitivity of CADe using LCI is significantly higher than those of expert endoscopists using LCI to detect GC.

Recent Progress of Image-Enhanced Endoscopy for Upper Gastrointestinal Neoplasia and Associated Lesions.

BACKGROUND: The main therapeutic modality of early upper gastrointestinal neoplasms has shifted from surgery to endoscopic therapy. The role of endoscopy has also expanded not only for more accurate diagnosis of neoplasms but also for the determination of extent and depth of neoplasms with a combination of multiple electronically modified images acquired with image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) for assessing the feasibility of endoscopic treatment. SUMMARY: These IEE with or without magnifying endoscopy including narrow-band imaging, blue laser imaging, and linked color imaging (LCI) using narrow-band light have greatly changed the diagnosis for upper gastrointestinal neoplasms. These modalities produce high color contrast between cancer and surrounding mucosa at distant views and clear visualization of surface and vessels at close-up observations. LCI shows purple color of intestinal metaplasia (IM) distinct from other inflammatory gastric mucosae and facilitates the recognition of early gastric cancers often surrounded by IM. Recently, ultrathin endoscopy has provided high-resolution images similar to standard-caliber endoscopy. In addition, these advanced IEEs that integrate computer-assisted artificial intelligence systems are marked and will improve our diagnostic performance for neoplasia in the future. KEY MESSAGE: New IEE with sufficient brightness and color contrast has increasingly been used based on accumulated evidence for early and accurate detection of neoplastic lesions. We provide recent articles relevant to endoscopic diagnosis with IEE on esophageal, gastric, and duodenal neoplasms. Endoscopic equipment that integrates artificial intelligence support system is now being introduced into routine clinical use and is expected to enhance early detection of neoplastic lesions.

Surveillance esophagogastroduodenoscopy using linked color imaging and narrow-band imaging: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: There has been no report on a direct comparison between linked color imaging (LCI) and second-generation narrow-band imaging (2G-NBI) for surveillance of epithelial neoplasms in the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGIT). The aim of this study was to verify the superiority of LCI to 2G-NBI for surveillance esophagogastroduodenoscopy and to clarify how each endoscopic system should be used. METHODS: This study was conducted as an open-label, two-arm-parallel (1:1), multicenter, randomized controlled trial at six institutions. Patients aged 20-85 years with a treatment history of epithelial neoplasms in the UGIT were recruited. Patients were assigned to a 2G-NBI group and an LCI group, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed with primary image-enhanced endoscopy followed by white light imaging (WLI). The primary endpoint was the detection rate of one or more epithelial neoplasms in the primary image-enhanced endoscopy. A WLI-detected epithelial neoplasm was defined as a lesion that was detected in only WLI. RESULTS: A total of 372 patients in the 2G-NBI group and 378 patients in the LCI group were analyzed. Epithelial neoplasms in the UGIT were detected by 2G-NBI in 18 patients (4.6%) and were detected by LCI in 20 patients (5.3%) (P = 0.87). WLI-detected epithelial neoplasms were in 11 patients in the 2G-NBI group (3.0%) and in 1 patient in the LCI group (0.27%) (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Linked color imaging did not show superiority to 2G-NBI for the detection of epithelial neoplasms. Also, the percentage of WLI-detected epithelial neoplasms in primary NBI was significantly higher than that in primary LCI.

Linked color imaging improves colorectal lesion detection especially for low performance endoscopists: An international trial in Asia.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Linked color imaging (LCI) is an image-enhanced endoscopy technique that accentuates the color difference between red and white, potentially improving the adenoma detection rate (ADR). However, it remains unclear whether LCI performance in detecting colorectal lesions differs based on endoscopists' experience levels. We aimed to evaluate the differences in LCI efficacy based on the experience levels of endoscopists by conducting an exploratory analysis. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of an international randomized controlled trial comparing the detection of adenoma and other lesions using colonoscopy with LCI and high-definition white light imaging (WLI), we included patients from 11 institutions across four countries/regions: Japan, Thailand, Taiwan, and Singapore. We retrospectively reviewed differences in the lesion detection of LCI according to endoscopists' colonoscopy history or ADR. RESULTS: We included 1692 and 1138 patients who underwent colonoscopies performed by 54 experts (experience of ≥ 5000 colonoscopies) and by 43 non-experts (experience of < 5000 colonoscopies), respectively. Both expert and non-expert groups showed a significant improvement in ADR with LCI compared to WLI (expert, 61.7% vs 46.4%; P < 0.001; non-expert, 56.6% vs 46.4%; P < 0.001). LCI had no effect on sessile serrated lesion detection rate in non-experts (3.1% vs 2.5%; P = 0.518). LCI significantly improved detection rates in endoscopists with relatively low detection performance, defined as an ADR < 50%. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study analyzed data from a previous trial and revealed that LCI is useful for both experts and non-experts and is even more beneficial for endoscopists with relatively low detection performance using WLI.

L-Menthol for Color Difference Change Between Early Gastric Cancer and Surrounding Mucosa: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: L-Menthol sprayed on early gastric cancer (EGC) has been reported to improve the visibility of the lesion. However, its impact when used in combination with novel image-enhanced endoscopy has not been investigated. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the visual effect of spraying L-menthol on EGC under linked color imaging (LCI). METHODS: This open-label, single-arm, prospective study investigated the color difference between EGC and the surrounding mucosa (ΔEG) before and after spraying L-menthol. The primary endpoint was the percentage of lesions with ΔEG ≥ 5 on LCI. The percentage of lesions with ΔEG ≥ 5 on white light imaging (WLI) and blue laser imaging (BLI), ΔEG before and after spraying L-menthol, and percentage of lesions with increased ΔEG after spraying L-menthol constituted the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included in the final analysis. 100% lesions had ΔEG ≥ 5, both before and after spraying L-menthol on LCI, with similar results observed in WLI as well as BLI. The median ΔEG on LCI, WLI, and BLI increased after spraying L-menthol (LCI: 16.9 vs. 21.5, p < 0.01; WLI: 10.4 vs. 13.4, p < 0.01; BLI; 12.1 vs. 15.7, before and after, respectively, p < 0.01); and LCI demonstrated the highest percentage of lesions with increased ΔEG (LCI, WLI, and BLI: 98.3%, 81.7%, and 76.7%, respectively, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Although spraying L-menthol did not improve the visibility of EGC under LCI observation, a significant increase in ΔEG was observed in LCI (jRCTs 021200027).

Practical utility of linked color imaging in colonoscopy: Updated literature review.

The remarkable recent developments in image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) have significantly contributed to the advancement of diagnostic techniques. Linked color imaging (LCI) is an IEE technique in which color differences are expanded by processing image data to enhance short-wavelength narrow-band light. This feature of LCI causes reddish areas to appear redder and whitish areas to appear whiter. Because most colorectal lesions, such as neoplastic and inflammatory lesions, have a reddish tone, LCI is an effective tool for identifying colorectal lesions by clarifying the redder areas and distinguishing them from the surrounding normal mucosa. To date, eight randomized controlled trials have been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of LCI in identifying colorectal adenomatous lesions. The results of a meta-analysis integrating these studies demonstrated that LCI was superior to white-light endoscopy for detecting colorectal adenomatous lesions. LCI also improves the detection of serrated lesions by enhancing their whiteness. Furthermore, accumulating evidence suggests that LCI is superior to white-light endoscopy for the diagnosis of the colonic mucosa in patients with ulcerative colitis. In this review, based on a comprehensive search of the current literature since the implementation of LCI, the utility of LCI in the detection and diagnosis of colorectal lesions is discussed. Additionally, the latest data, including attempts to combine artificial intelligence and LCI, are presented.

Colorectal Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Using Linked Color Imaging: A Multicenter, Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Linked color imaging (LCI) is a novel technology that improves the color differences between colorectal lesions and the surrounding mucosa. The present study aims to compare the detection of colorectal sessile serrated lesions (SSL) using LCI with white light imaging (WLI). METHOD: A large-scale, multicenter, parallel prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted in 4 hospitals in China. The participants were randomly assigned to the LCI group and WLI group. The primary endpoint was the SSL detection rate (SDR). RESULTS: A total of 884 patients were involved in the intention-to-treat analysis, with 441 patients in the LCI group and 443 patients in the WLI group. The total polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and SDR were 51.8%, 35.7%, and 8.6%, respectively. The SDR was significantly higher in the LCI group than in the WLI group (11.3% vs 5.9%, P = .004). Furthermore, LCI significantly increased the number of polyps and adenomas detected per patient, when compared with WLI (P < .05). In addition, there was higher detection rate of diminutive and flat lesions in the LCI group (P < .05). Multivariate analysis revealed that LCI is an independent factor associated with SDR (hazard ratio, 1.990; 95% confidence interval, 1.203-3.293; P = .007), along with withdrawal time (hazard ratio, 1.157; 95% confidence interval, 1.060-1.263; P = .001) and operator experience (hazard ratio, 1.850; 95% confidence interval, 1.045-3.273; P = .035). CONCLUSIONS: LCI is significantly superior to WLI for SSL detection, and may improve polyp and adenoma detection. LCI can be recommended as an appropriate method for routine inspection during colonoscopy (http://www.chictr.org.cn number, ChiCTR2000035705).

Linked-Color Imaging Detects More Colorectal Adenoma and Serrated Lesions: An International Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Effects of linked-color imaging (LCI) on colorectal lesion detection and colonoscopy quality remain controversial. This study compared the detection rates of adenoma and other precursor lesions using LCI vs white-light imaging (WLI) during screening, diagnostic, and surveillance colonoscopies. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was performed at 11 institutions in 4 Asian countries/regions. Patients with abdominal symptoms, a primary screening colonoscopy, positive fecal immunochemical test results, or undergoing postpolypectomy surveillance were recruited and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the LCI or high-definition WLI group. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes were polyp detection rate, advanced ADR, sessile serrated lesion (SSL) detection rate, and the mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy. The recommended surveillance schedule distribution after trial colonoscopy was analyzed. RESULTS: Between November 2020 and January 2022, there were 3050 participants (LCI, n = 1527; WLI, n = 1523) recruited. The LCI group ADR was significantly higher than the WLI group ADR using intention-to-treat (58.7% vs 46.7%; P < .01) and per-protocol analyses (59.6% vs 46.4%; P < .01). The LCI group polyp detection rates (68.6% vs 59.5%; P < .01), SSL detection rates (4.8% vs 2.8%; P < .01), and adenomas per colonoscopy (1.48 vs 1.02; P < .01) also were significantly higher. However, the advanced ADR was not significantly different (13.2% vs 11.0%; P = .06). Significantly more patients in the LCI group had shorter recommended surveillance schedules than the WLI group (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with WLI, LCI improved adenoma and other polyp detection rates, including SSLs, resulting in alteration of the recommended surveillance schedule after screening, diagnostic, and postpolypectomy surveillance colonoscopies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000042432 (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm).

Improvement of detection sensitivity of upper gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia in linked color imaging based on data of eye tracking.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Linked color imaging (LCI) is useful for screening in the gastrointestinal tract; however, its true clinical benefit has not been determined. The aim of this study was to determine the objective advantage of LCI for detection of upper gastrointestinal neoplasms. METHODS: Nine endoscopists, including three novices, three trainees, and three experts, prospectively performed eye tracking. From 30 cases of esophageal or gastric neoplasm and 30 normal cases without neoplasms, a total of 120 images, including 60 pair images of white light imaging (WLI) and LCI taken at the same positions and angles, were randomly shown for 10 s. The sensitivity of tumor detection as a primary endpoint was evaluated and sensitivities by organ, size, and visual gaze pattern were also assessed. Color differences (ΔE using CIE1976 [L*a*b*]) between lesions and surrounding mucosa were measured and compared with detectability. RESULTS: A total of 1080 experiments were completed. The sensitivities of tumor detection in WLI and LCI were 53.7% (50.1-56.8%) and 68.1% (64.8-70.8%), respectively (P = 0.002). LCI provided higher sensitivity than WLI for the novice and trainee groups (novice: 42.2% [WLI] vs 65.6% [LCI], P = 0.003; trainee: 54.4% vs 70.0%, P = 0.045). No significant correlations were found between sensitivity and visual gaze patterns. LCI significantly increased ΔE, and the diagnostic accuracy with WLI depended on ΔE. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, LCI significantly improved sensitivity in the detection of epithelial neoplasia and enabled epithelial neoplasia detection that is not possible with the small color difference in WLI. (UMIN000047944).

Linked color imaging provides enhanced visibility with a high color difference in upper gastrointestinal neoplasms.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The aim of this post-hoc analysis in a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial was to evaluate the visibility of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) neoplasms detected using linked color imaging (LCI) compared with those detected using white light imaging (WLI). METHODS: The visibility of the detected UGI neoplasm images obtained using both WLI and LCI was subjectively reviewed, and the median color difference (ΔE) between each lesion and the surrounding mucosa according to the CIE L*a*b* color space was evaluated objectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with neoplasms that were missed under WLI and detected under LCI. RESULTS: A total of 120 neoplasms, including 10, 32, and 78 neoplasms in the pharynx, esophagus, and stomach, respectively, were analyzed in this study. LCI enhanced the visibility 80.9% and 93.6% of neoplasms in pharynx/esophagus and stomach compared with WLI, respectively. LCI also achieved a higher ΔE of enhanced neoplasms compared with WLI in the pharynx/esophagus and stomach. The median WLI ΔE values for gastric neoplasms missed under WLI and later detected under LCI were significantly lower than those for gastric neoplasms detected under WLI (8.2 vs 9.6, respectively). Furthermore, low levels of WLI ΔE (odds ratio [OR], 7.215) and high levels of LCI ΔE (OR, 22.202) were significantly associated with gastric neoplasms missed under WLI and later detected under LCI. CONCLUSION: Color differences were independently associated with missing gastric neoplasms under WLI, suggesting that LCI has an obvious advantage over WLI in enhancing neoplastic visibility.

Possible Role of Image-Enhanced Endoscopy in the Evaluation of Mucosal Healing of Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Mucosal healing (MH) is recognized as a therapeutic target in ulcerative colitis (UC) because of evidence that it is associated with favorable clinical outcomes. Current endoscopic assessment of MH by conventional white-light endoscopy is subject to several important clinical issues including the subjective nature of assessment, intra- and interobserver variability, and persistent microscopic inflammation, even in mucosa it was observed as quiescent on conventional endoscopy. SUMMARY: Advances in image-enhancement technologies enable the provision of high-contrast images that emphasize the mucosal structures, blood vessel patterns, and color tones of the intestinal mucosa, and recently, several image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) techniques have become available for the assessment of MH in UC. Narrow-band imaging and dual-red imaging facilitate visualization of mucosal vascular structures, which is useful for detecting minor inflammation and predicting relapse because of the capturing of information on incomplete vascular regeneration in patients with UC. Linked-color imaging (LCI) is optimized to emphasize the redness of the mucosa and blood vessels, and is superior for depicting subtle color changes arising from mucosal inflammation. LCI could possibly be used to stratify UC patients with MH on conventional endoscopy. Autofluorescence imaging and i-scan can also depict subtle histological changes underlying the healing of mucosa in UC, revealing them as simple color changes. KEY MESSAGES: Accumulating evidence suggests that IEE techniques could overcome current unmet needs in the endoscopic assessment of MH in UC and contribute to improving therapy based on treat-to-target strategies.

Comparison of LED and LASER Colonoscopy About Linked Color Imaging and Blue Laser/Light Imaging of Colorectal Tumors in a Multinational Study.

INTRODUCTION: In light-emitting diode (LED) and LASER colonoscopy, linked color imaging (LCI) and blue light/laser imaging (BLI) are used for lesion detection and characterization worldwide. We analyzed the difference of LCI and BLI images of colorectal lesions between LED and LASER in a multinational study. METHODS: We prospectively observed lesions with white light imaging (WLI), LCI, and BLI using both LED and LASER colonoscopies from January 2020 to August 2021. Images were graded by 27 endoscopists from nine countries using the polyp visibility score: 4 (excellent), 3 (good), 2 (fair), and 1 (poor) and the comparison score (LED better/similar/LASER better) for WLI/LCI/BLI images of each lesion. RESULTS: Finally, 32 lesions (polyp size: 20.0 ± 15.2 mm) including 9 serrated lesions, 13 adenomas, and 10 T1 cancers were evaluated. The polyp visibility scores of LCI/WLI for international and Japan-expert endoscopists were 3.17 ± 0.73/3.17 ± 0.79 (p = 0.92) and 3.34 ± 0.78/2.84 ± 1.22 (p < 0.01) for LED and 3.30 ± 0.71/3.12 ± 0.77 (p < 0.01) and 3.31 ± 0.82/2.78 ± 1.23 (p < 0.01) for LASER. Regarding the comparison of lesion visibility about between LED and LASER colonoscopy in international endoscopists, a significant difference was achieved not for WLI, but for LCI. The rates of LED better/similar/LASER better for brightness under WLI were 54.5%/31.6%/13.9% (International) and 75.0%/21.9%/3.1% (Japan expert). Those under LCI were 39.2%/35.4%/25.3% (International) and 31.3%/53.1%/15.6% (Japan expert). There were no significant differences in the diagnostic accuracy and the comparison score of BLI images between LED and LASER. CONCLUSIONS: The differences of lesion visibility for WLI/LCI/BLI between LED and LASER in international endoscopists could be compared to those in Japanese endoscopists.

Blue light imaging and linked color imaging as a screening mode for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in high-risk patients: Multicenter randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: Blue light imaging (BLI) and linked color imaging (LCI) are superior to conventional white light imaging for detecting esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Hence, we compared their diagnostic performances in ESCC screening. METHODS: This open-labeled, randomized controlled trial was performed at seven hospitals. Patients with a high risk of ESCC were randomly assigned to the BLI group (BLI followed by LCI) and LCI group (LCI followed by BLI). The primary end-point was the detection rate of ESCC in the primary mode. The main secondary end-point was its miss rate in the primary mode. RESULTS: In total, 699 patients were enrolled. The detection rate of ESCC did not significantly differ between the BLI and LCI groups (4.0% [14/351] vs. 4.9% [17/348]; P = 0.565); however, the number of patients with ESCC tended to be smaller in the BLI group (19 vs. 30). Notably, the miss rate of ESCC was lower in the BLI group (26.3% [5/19] vs. 63.3% [19/30]; P = 0.012) and LCI detected no ESCCs missed by BLI. The sensitivity was higher in BLI (75.0% vs. 47.6%; P = 0.042); on the other hand, the positive predictive value in BLI tended to be lower (28.8% vs. 45.5%; P = 0.092). CONCLUSIONS: The detection rates of ESCC did not significantly differ between BLI and LCI. Although BLI may have the potential to be advantageous over LCI for the diagnosis of ESCC, it is still unclear whether BLI is superior to LCI, and a further large-scale study is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT1022190018-1).

Linked Color Imaging and Blue Laser Imaging for the Diagnosis of Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate endoscopic findings using linked color imaging (LCI) and blue laser imaging (BLI) and to determine a diagnostic predictor for duodenal adenocarcinomas. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) between October 2012 and June 2019 were enrolled in this study. Two highly experienced endoscopists investigated six morphological findings using both white light imaging and LCI and three magnifying endoscopic findings using magnifying BLI (M-BLI). RESULTS: A total of 90 patients with 110 SNADETs, including 87 adenocarcinomas and 23 adenomas, were analyzed in this study. Among the non-magnifying endoscopic findings, the presence of reddish color, orange color on LCI (orange color sign), lobulation, depression, and marginally white opaque substance were found significantly more frequently in adenocarcinomas than in adenomas (p = 0.015, p < 0.001, p = 0.048, p < 0.001, and p = 0.007, respectively). Among the magnifying endoscopic findings, a mixed microsurface pattern (MSP), irregular MSP, and irregular microvascular pattern were found significantly more frequently in adenocarcinomas than in adenomas (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.002, respectively). In the multivariate analysis of all endoscopic findings associated with adenocarcinoma, orange color sign (odds ratio [OR] 10.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.42-77.08; p = 0.021), mixed MSP (OR 4.66; 95% CI: 1.02-21.40; p = 0.048), and irregular MSP (OR 13.11; 95% CI: 1.41-121.99; p = 0.024) were independent predictors of adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of orange color sign on LCI and mixed/irregular MSP on M-BLI were independent diagnostic predictors that were frequently observed in duodenal adenocarcinoma.

Linked color imaging improves identification of early gastric cancer lesions by expert and non-expert endoscopists.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Early gastric cancer (EGC) lesions are often subtle and endoscopically poorly visible. The aim of this study is to evaluate the additive effect of linked color imaging (LCI) next to white-light endoscopy (WLE) for identification of EGC, when assessed by expert and non-expert endoscopists. METHODS: Forty EGC cases were visualized in corresponding WLE and LCI images. Endoscopists evaluated the cases in 3 assessment phases: Phase 1: WLE images only; Phase 2: LCI images only; Phase 3: WLE and LCI images side-to-side. First, 3 expert endoscopists delineated all cases. A high level of agreement between the expert delineations corresponded with a high AND/OR ratio. Subsequently, 62 non-experts indicated their preferred biopsy location. Outcomes of the study are as follows: (1) difference in expert AND/OR ratio; (2) accuracy of biopsy placement by non-expert endoscopists; and (3) preference of imaging modality by non-expert endoscopists. RESULTS: Quantitative agreement between experts increased significantly when LCI was available (0.58 vs. 0.46, p = 0.007). This increase was more apparent for the more challenging cases (0.21 vs. 0.47, p < 0.001). Non-experts placed the biopsy mark more accurately with LCI (82.3% vs. 87.2%, p < 0.001). Again this increase was more profound for the more challenging cases (70.4% vs. 83.4%, p < 0.001). Non-experts indicated to prefer LCI over WLE. CONCLUSION: The addition of LCI next to WLE improves visualization of EGC. Experts reach higher consensus on discrimination between neoplasia and inflammation when using LCI. Non-experts improve their targeted biopsy placement with the use of LCI. LCI therefore appears to be a useful tool for identification of EGC.

Linked Color Imaging (LCI) Emphasizes the Color Changes in the Gastric Mucosa After Helicobacter pylori Eradication.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse redness is a characteristic endoscopic finding that indicates current infection of Helicobacter pylori, which is reduced after successful eradication. Linked color imaging (LCI) has been reported to improve the visibility of diffuse redness compared to white light imaging (WLI); however, quantitative evaluation has not been reported. AIMS: This study aimed to objectively evaluate the color change of the gastric mucosa after H. pylori eradication. METHODS: Images of the greater curvature of the antrum and corpus were captured, and the sites were biopsied during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) before and 1 year after eradication. The region of interest (ROI) was set around the biopsied area on the images. The color difference (ΔE) before and after eradication was calculated using the CIE L*a*b* color space. The association between the histological evaluation and the color value of the corresponding ROI was determined. RESULTS: At the antrum, there was no significant color change with either mode. At the corpus, the a* value, which reflected redness, decreased significantly after eradication with both modes (WLI: 41.2 to 36.0, LCI: 37.5 to 25.5); the b* value, reflecting yellowish, decreased with WLI, but increased significantly with LCI (WLI: 44.6 to 41.6, LCI: 23.9 to 29.2). The ΔE was significantly larger with LCI than with WLI (16.5 vs. 8.6). The a* values at the corpus were generally associated with histological neutrophil infiltration. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative evaluation revealed that LCI emphasizes the change in color of the gastric mucosa due to the reduction in diffuse redness.

Enhanced Visibility in Evaluating Gastric Cancer and Helicobacter pylori-Associated Gastritis Using Linked Color Imaging with a Light-Emitting Diode Light Source.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, laser light source (Laser) endoscopy is widely available, and the characteristics of light-emitting diode light source (LED) endoscopy have not been clarified. AIMS: We assessed the visibility of early gastric cancers (EGCs) and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-associated gastritis for LED endoscopy compared with laser endoscopy using white-light imaging (WLI) and linked color imaging (LCI). METHODS: We assessed 99 lesions between February 2019 and March 2020. The visibility was scored from four (excellent visibility) to one (poor visibility) by evaluating videos including EGCs and gastric mucosa captured using WLI and LCI with LED endoscopy (LED-WLI and LED-LCI, respectively) and laser endoscopy (Laser-WLI and Laser-LCI, respectively). The primary end point was the non-inferiority of the visibility of EGCs and H. pylori-associated gastritis between LED-/Laser-WLI and LED-/Laser-LCI. RESULTS: The visibility scores of EGCs for LED-/Laser-WLI and LED-/Laser-LCI were 3.14/2.97 and 3.39/3.35, respectively. The visibility scores of H. pylori-associated gastritis [intestinal metaplasia (IM), diffuse redness (DR), regular arrangement of collecting venules (RAC) and map-like redness (MR)] for LED-/Laser-WLI and LED-/Laser-LCI were 3.05/2.85 and 3.60/3.50 (IM), 2.76/2.50 and 2.96/2.86 (DR), 2.69/2.44 and 2.77/2.62 (RAC) and 2.97/2.75 and 3.39/3.27 (MR). Non-inferiority was demonstrated for visualizing EGCs and H. pylori-associated gastritis. CONCLUSIONS: LED-WLI and LED-LCI can be used to visualize EGCs and H. pylori-associated gastritis with non-inferiority to Laser-WLI and Laser-LCI. Furthermore, even with LED, LCI was more effective than WLI for evaluating EGCs and H. pylori-associated gastritis. Therefore, LED endoscopy can be used to detect EGCs and evaluate H. pylori-associated gastritis accurately.

Images of laser and light-emitting diode colonoscopy for comparing large colorectal lesion visibility with linked color imaging and white-light imaging.

OBJECTIVES: In light-emitting diode (LED) and laser colonoscopy, linked color imaging (LCI) superiority to white-light imaging (WLI) for polyp detection is shown separately. We analyzed the noninferiority of LCI between LED and laser colonoscopy and that of WLI (LECOL study). METHODS: We prospectively collected nonpolypoid lesions with WLI and LCI using LED and laser colonoscopy from January 2021 to August 2021. All images were evaluated randomly by 12 endoscopists (six nonexperts and six experts in three institutions) using the polyp visibility score: 4, excellent; 3, good; 2, fair; and 1, poor. The comparison score (LED better/similar/laser better) for redness and brightness was evaluated for WLI and LCI pictures of each lesion. RESULTS: Finally, 63 nonpolypoid lesions were evaluated, and the mean polyp size was 24.5 ± 13.4 mm. Histopathology revealed 13 serrated lesions and 50 adenomatous/cancerous lesions. The mean polyp visibility scores of LCI pictures were significantly higher than those of WLI in the LED (3.35 ± 0.85 vs. 3.08 ± 0.91, P < 0.001) and the laser (3.40 ± 1.71 vs. 3.05 ± 0.97, P < 0.001) group, and the noninferiority of LCI pictures between LED and laser was significant (P < 0.001). The comparison scores revealed that the evaluation of redness and brightness (LED better/similar/laser better) were 26.8%/40.1%/33.1% and 43.5%/43.5%/13.0% for LCI pictures (P < 0.001) and 20.6%/44.3%/35.1% and 60.3%/31.7%/8.0% for WLI pictures (P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: The noninferiority of polyp visibility with WLI and LCI in LED and laser colonoscopy was shown. WLI and LCI of LED tended to be brighter and less reddish than those of laser.

Usefulness of linked color imaging for the detection of obscure early gastric cancer: Multivariate analysis of 508 lesions.

OBJECTIVES: Early gastric cancers (EGCs) of the elevated type or with submucosal invasion are easily found by routine endoscopy. However, most early cancers are challenging to detect because of subtle morphological or color differences from surrounding atrophic mucosa and intestinal metaplasia. Linked color imaging (LCI) enhances mucosal color difference, making it easier to detect EGCs. The aim of this study is to clarify the advantages and possible disadvantages of LCI for screening for obscure EGC. METHODS: A total of 665 malignant gastric lesions resected using endoscopic submucosal dissection between January 2015 and April 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Obviously detectable lesions were not included in the main analysis when determining the target lesion. White light imaging (WLI)/LCI images of 508 endoscopically obscure malignant lesions were included in the final analysis and evaluated by three non-expert and three expert endoscopists using visibility scores for detection and extent. RESULTS: The detection visibility scores using LCI were significantly higher than those using WLI regardless of lesion characteristics including location, size, histological type, depth of invasion, and Helicobacter pylori status. The detection score improved in 46.4% cases and deteriorated in 4.9% when the modality changed from WLI to LCI. A mixed-effects multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that use of LCI (odds ratio [OR] 2.57), elevated type (OR 1.92), invasion to submucosa (OR 2.18) were significantly associated with improved visibility of EGC. CONCLUSIONS: Linked color imaging significantly improves visibility of EGC regardless of differences in lesion morphology, histology, location, depth of invasion, and H. pylori status compared to conventional WLI.