Clinical impact of left atrial remodeling pattern in patients with atrial fibrillation: Comparison of volumetric, electrical, and combined remodeling.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is accompanied by various types of remodeling, including volumetric enlargement and histological degeneration. Electrical remodeling reportedly reflects histological degeneration. PURPOSE: To clarify the differences in determinants and clinical impacts among types of remodeling. METHODS: This observational study included 1118 consecutive patients undergoing initial ablation for AF. Patients were divided into four groups: minimal remodeling (left atrial volume index [LAVI] < mean value and no low-voltage area [LVA], n = 477); volumetric remodeling (LAVI ≥ mean value and no LVA, n = 361); electrical remodeling (LAVI < mean value and LVA presence, n = 96); and combined remodeling (LAVI ≥ mean value and LVA presence, n = 184). AF recurrence and other clinical outcomes were followed up for 2 and 5 years, respectively. RESULTS: Major determinants of each remodeling pattern were high age for electrical (odds ratio = 2.32, 95% confidence interval = 1.68-3.25) and combined remodeling (2.57, 1.88-3.49); female for electrical (3.85, 2.21-6.71) and combined remodeling (4.92, 2.90-8.25); persistent AF for combined remodeling (7.09, 3.75-13.4); and heart failure for volumetric (1.71, 1.51-2.53) and combined remodeling (2.21, 1.30-3.75). Recurrence rate after initial ablation increased in the order of minimal remodeling (20.1%), volumetric (27.4%) or electrical remodeling (36.5%), and combined remodeling (50.0%, p < .0001). A composite endpoint of heart failure, stroke, and death occurred in the order of minimal (3.4%), volumetric (7.5%) or electrical (8.3%), and combined remodeling (15.2%, p < .0001). CONCLUSION: Volumetric, electrical, and combined remodeling were each associated with a unique patient background, and defined rhythm and other clinical outcomes.

Adjunctive low-voltage area ablation for patients with atrial fibrillation: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of adjunctive low-voltage area (LVA) ablation on outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) remains uncertain. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CA with versus without LVA ablation for patients with AF. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled with a random-effects model. Our primary endpoint was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA), including AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia. We used R version 4.3.1 for all statistical analyses. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included 10 RCTs encompassing 1780 patients, of whom 890 (50%) were randomized to LVA ablation. Adjunctive LVA ablation significantly reduced recurrence of ATA (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.67-0.88; p < .01) and reduced the number of redo ablation procedures (RR 0.54; 95% CI 0.35-0.85; p < .01), as compared with conventional ablation. Among 691 (43%) patients with documented LVAs on baseline substrate mapping, adjunctive LVA ablation substantially reduced ATA recurrences (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.38-0.86; p < .01). There was no significant difference between groups in terms of periprocedural adverse events (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.39-1.56; p = .49). CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive LVA ablation is an effective and safe strategy for reducing recurrences of ATA among patients who undergo CA for AF.

An artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram algorithm for the prediction of left atrial low-voltage areas in persistent atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to construct an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram (ECG) algorithm that can accurately predict the presence of left atrial low-voltage areas (LVAs) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. METHODS: The study included 587 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who underwent catheter ablation procedures between March 2012 and December 2023 and 942 scanned images of 12-lead ECGs obtained before the ablation procedures were performed. Artificial intelligence-based algorithms were used to construct models for predicting the presence of LVAs. The DR-FLASH and APPLE clinical scores for LVA prediction were calculated. We used a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis to evaluate model performance. RESULTS: The data obtained from the participants were split into training (n = 469), validation (n = 58), and test sets (n = 60). LVAs were detected in 53.7% of all participants. Using ECG alone, the deep learning algorithm achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.752, outperforming both the DR-FLASH score (AUROC = 0.610) and the APPLE score (AUROC = 0.510). The random forest classification model, which integrated a probabilistic deep learning model and clinical features, showed a maximum AUROC of 0.759. Moreover, the ECG-based deep learning algorithm for predicting extensive LVAs achieved an AUROC of 0.775, with a sensitivity of 0.816 and a specificity of 0.896. The random forest classification model for predicting extensive LVAs achieved an AUROC of 0.897, with a sensitivity of 0.862, and a specificity of 0.935. CONCLUSION: The deep learning model based exclusively on ECG data and the machine learning model that combined a probabilistic deep learning model and clinical features both predicted the presence of LVAs with a higher degree of accuracy than the DR-FLASH and the APPLE risk scores.

Left Atrial Electrophysiological Properties after Pulmonary Vein Isolation Predict the Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation: A Cohort Study.

Background: The aim of this work was to investigate left atrial electrophysiological properties for their ability to predict the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods: The study comprised 53 patients with AF [62 (interquartile range (IQR): 52-68) years old; 47.2% females]. High-density, three-dimensional electro-anatomic mapping using PentaRay was conducted during sinus rhythm in the left atrium (LA) immediately after PVI. LA conduction time, conduction velocity in predefined anterior and posterior routes, low voltage area percentage and distribution were assessed. Results: The AF recurrence group had longer LA conduction time compared to the non-recurrence group [11 (IQR: 10-12) ms vs. 9 (IQR: 8-10) ms, p = 0.001). The percent low voltage area was greater in the recurrence group than the non-recurrence group [31.2 (IRQ: 7.1-49.3)% vs. 7.7 (IQR: 4.3-15.2)%, p = 0.008]. Multivariate Cox regression revealed that LA conduction time independently predicted AF recurrence following ablation over a median follow-up of 235 days [IQR: 154-382 days; hazard ratio (HR): 2.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-5.23, p = 0.031]. The optimal cut-off for LA conduction time was 98 ms [area under curve (AUC): 0.926, sensitivity: 0.833, specificity: 0.894, p < 0.01]. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with a conduction time > 98 ms had a higher rate of AF recurrence following ablation (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with longer LA conduction time after PVI had more frequent AF recurrence.

Impact of unipolar voltage criteria for left atrial posterior wall on atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation.

INTRODUCTION: Beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), additional therapeutic strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF) have not been established. Remodeling of the left atrium (LA) could impact AF recurrence post-PVI. We investigated the impact of unipolar voltage (UV) criteria for the LA posterior wall (LA-PW) on AF recurrence post-PVI. METHODS: We reviewed the cases of 106 AF patients (mean age 63.8 years, nonparoxysmal AF: 59%) who underwent extensive encircling PVI by radiofrequency ablation guided by a 3-dimension mapping system, investigating the impact on AF recurrence of the UV criteria of the LA. RESULTS: Out of all patients, 26 patients had AF recurrence during post-PVI follow-up [median 603 days]. They showed a higher percentage of nonparoxysmal AF (80.8 vs. 52.5%, p = .011), longer AF duration (2.9 ± 2.7 vs. 1.0 ± 1.7 years, p = .002), and larger area size of UV < 2.0 mV in LA-PW (2.8 ± 1.8 vs. 1.0 ± 1.5 cm2 , p < .001) than those without recurrence. Cox Hazard analysis for AF recurrence adjusted by age, gender, AF duration, body mass index and left atrial volume index revealed that an area size over 2.0 cm2 of UV < 2.0 mV in LA-PW (HR 6.9 [95% CI:1.3-35.5], p = .021) posed independent risks for AF recurrence post-PVI. The atrial arrhythmia-free survival rate was higher in those with no area of UV < 3.0 mV in LA-PW compared to those with a sizable area (>2.0 cm2 ) of UV < 3.0 mV and <2.0 mV (95.0% vs. 74.2% vs. 57.1%, Log-Rank: p < .001). In the AF etiology of patients with AF recurrence, 9 of 14 patients who underwent the 2nd procedure had no PV reconnection, and 8 patients required the LA-PW isolation for their non-PV AF. CONCLUSION: UV criteria of LA-PW is a useful parameter for AF-recurrence post-PVI. Lower UV in LA-PW as an indication of electrical remodeling could indicate a higher risk of AF recurrence and the need for further therapeutic strategies.

Spatial relationship of localized sources of persistent atrial fibrillation identified by a unipolar-based automated algorithm to complex fractionated atrial electrocardiograms and atrial low voltage areas.

INTRODUCTION: Spatial characteristics of localized sources of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) identified by unipolar-based panoramic mapping software (CARTOFINDER) remain unclear. We evaluated spatial characteristics of bi-atrial AF localized sources in relation to complex fractionated atrial electrocardiograms (CFAEs) and atrial low voltage area (LVAs) (≤0.35 mV during AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty consecutive patients with persistent AF underwent bi-atrial voltage, CFAE, and CARTOFINDER mapping before the beginning of ablation (18 [90%] patients, initial procedure; 2 [10%] patients, repeat procedure). CFAEs were recorded using the interval confidence level (ICL) mode and defined as sites with a confidence level of ≥80% of maximal ICL number. We elucidated the following: (1) differences in the rate of AF localized sources and CFAEs inside or outside the atrial LVAs; (2) distribution of AF localized sources and CFAEs; and (3) distance between the closest points of AF localized sources and CFAEs. A total of 270 AF localized sources and 486 CFAEs were identified in 20 patients. AF localized sources were confirmed more often outside atrial LVAs than CFAEs (71% vs. 46% outside LVA, p < .001). AF localized sources and CFAEs were diffusely distributed without any tendency in bi-atria. Mean distance between closest AF localized sources and CFAEs was 22 ± 8 mm. CONCLUSION: AF localized sources identified by CARTOFINDER are different therapeutic targets as compared to CFAEs and could be confirmed both inside and outside atrial LVAs.

Baseline left atrial low-voltage area predicts recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation: WAVE-MAP AF results.

AIMS: Electro-anatomical mapping may be critical to identify atrial fibrillation (AF) subjects who require substrate modification beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The objective was to determine correlations between pre-ablation mapping characteristics and 12-month outcomes after a single PVI-only catheter ablation of AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study enrolled paroxysmal AF (PAF), early persistent AF (PsAF; 7 days-3 months), and non-early PsAF (>3-12 months) subjects undergoing de novo PVI-only radiofrequency catheter ablation. Sinus rhythm (SR) and AF voltage maps were created with the Advisor HD Grid™ Mapping Catheter, Sensor Enabled™ for each subject, and the presence of low-voltage area (LVA) (low-voltage cutoffs: 0.1-1.5 mV) was investigated. Follow-up visits were at 3, 6, and 12 months, with a 24-h Holter monitor at 12 months. A Cox proportional hazards model identified associations between mapping data and 12-month recurrence after a single PVI procedure. The study enrolled 300 subjects (113 PAF, 86 early PsAF, and 101 non-early PsAF) at 18 centres. At 12 months, 75.5% of subjects were free from AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. Univariate analysis found that arrhythmia recurrence did not correlate with AF diagnosis, but LVA was significantly correlated. Low-voltage area (<0.5 mV) >28% of the left atrium in SR [hazard ratio (HR): 4.82, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.08-11.18; P = 0.0003] and >72% in AF (HR: 5.66, 95% CI: 2.34-13.69; P = 0.0001) was associated with a higher risk of AF/AFL/AT recurrence at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Larger extension of LVA was associated with an increased risk of arrhythmia recurrence. These subjects may benefit from substrate modification beyond PVI.

Impact of left atrial low-voltage areas during initial ablation procedures on very late recurrence of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Very late recurrence of atrial fibrillation (VLRAF) occurring >1 year after catheter ablation may influence long-term follow-up strategies, including oral anticoagulant therapy. However, little is known about the predictors of this condition. Given that the prevalence of left atrial low-voltage areas (LVAs) is strongly associated with the recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias following catheter ablation, we hypothesized that VLRAF might occur more frequently in patients with LVAs at the time of initial ablation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of LVAs on VLRAF. METHODS: This study included 1001 consecutive patients undergoing initial ablation procedures for AF. LVAs were defined as regions with bipolar peak-to-peak voltages of <0.50 mV on the voltage map obtained during sinus rhythm after pulmonary vein isolation. During a 1-year follow-up period, 248 patients had a late recurrence of AF (LRAF), defined as recurrence within 3-12 months after ablation. The occurrence of VLRAF was examined in 711 patients without LRAF who were followed for more than 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 711 patients who did not develop AF recurrence within 1 year and for whom clinical data were available after 1 year were analyzed. During a median follow-up of 25 (19, 37) months, VLRAF more than 1 year after the initial ablation was detected in 123 patients. On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of VLRAF were the existence of LVAs, female, left atrial diameter and early recurrence of AF. A Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the AF-free survival rate was significantly lower in patients with LVAs than in those without LVAs within 1 year and on more than 1-year follow-up (p < .001). An additional Kaplan-Meier analysis of the incidence of VLRAF in propensity score-matched patients with and without LVAs showed that VLRAF occurred significantly more frequently in patients with LVAs (p = .003). CONCLUSIONS: LVAs during the initial AF ablation procedures have an impact on VLRAF occurrence.

Low-Voltage-Area Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation　- Extended Follow-up Results of the VOLCANO Trial.

BACKGROUND: The randomized controlled VOLCANO trial demonstrated comparable 1-year rhythm outcomes between patients with and without ablation targeting low-voltage areas (LVAs) in addition to pulmonary vein isolation among paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) patients with LVAsMethods and Results:An extended-follow-up study of 402 patients enrolled in the VOLCANO trial with PAF, divided into 4 groups based on the results of voltage mapping: group A, no LVA (n=336); group B, LVA ablation (n=30); group C, LVA without ablation (n=32); and group D, incomplete voltage map (n=4). At 25 (23, 31) months after the initial ablation, AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence rates were 19% in group A, 57% in group B, 59% in group C, and 100% in group D. Recurrence rates were higher in patients with LVAs than in those without (group A vs. B+C, P<0.0001), and were comparable between those with and without LVA ablation (group B vs. C, P=0.83). Among patients who underwent repeat ablation, ATs were more frequently observed in patients with LVAs (Group B+C, 50% vs. A, 14%, P<0.0001). In addition, LVA ablation increased the incidence of AT development (group B, 71% vs. C, 32%, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LVAs demonstrated poor long-term rhythm outcomes irrespective of LVA ablation. ATs were frequently observed in patients with LVAs, and LVA ablation might exacerbate the occurrence of iatrogenic ATs.

Regional left atrial conduction velocity in the anterior wall is associated with clinical recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: efficacy in combination with the ipsilateral low voltage area.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) conduction velocity (CV) is an electrical remodeling parameter of atrial fibrillation (AF) substrate. However, the pathophysiological substrate of LA-CV and its impact on outcomes after catheter ablation for AF have not been well evaluated. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 119 patients with AF who underwent catheter ablation and electroanatomical mapping during sinus rhythm. To measure regional LA-CV, we took triplet sites (A, B, and C) on the activation map and calculated the magnitude of the matched orthogonal projection vector between vector-AB and vector-AC, indicating two-dimensional CV. The median of the LA-CVs from four triad sites in both the anterior and posterior walls was set as the 'model LA-CV'. We evaluated the impact of the model LA-CV on recurrence after ablation and relationship between the model LA-CV and LA-low voltage area (LVA) of < 0.5 mV. RESULTS: During the 12-month follow-up, 29 patients experienced recurrence. The LA-CV model was significantly correlated with ipsilateral LVA. The lower anterior model LA-CV was significantly associated with recurrence, with the cut-off value of 0.80 m/s having a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 67%. Multivariable analysis revealed that the anterior model LA-CV (hazard ratio, 0.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.94; p = 0.043) and anterior LA-LVA (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.11; p = 0.033) were independently associated with AF recurrence. The anterior LA-LVA was mildly correlated with the anterior model LA-CV (r = -0.358; p < 0.001), and patients with both lower LA-CV and greater anterior LA-LVA based on each cut-off value had the worst prognosis. However, decreased LA-CV was more likely to be affected by the distribution pattern of the LVA rather than the total size of the LVA. CONCLUSION: Decreased anterior LA-CV was a significant predictor of AF recurrence and was a useful electrical parameter in addition to LA-LVA for estimating AF arrhythmogenicity.

Comparison of the empirical linear ablation and low voltage area-guided ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone is not guaranteed for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF), and it is unclear which type of ablation approach should be applied in addition to PVI. This study aimed to compare outcomes and prognosis between empirical linear ablation and low-voltage area (LVA) ablation after PVI for PeAF. METHODS: We enrolled 128 patients with PeAF who were assigned to the linear ablation group (n = 64) and the LVA ablation group (n = 64) using a propensity score-matched model. After PVI and cardioversion, the patients underwent either empirical linear ablation or LVA ablation during sinus rhythm. All patients in the linear ablation group underwent both roof line and mitral valve isthmus (MVI) ablations. An electrical-guided ablation targeting LVA (< 0.5 mV) was performed in the LVA group. When there was no LVA in the LVA group, only PVI was applied. We compared the procedural outcomes and recurrence after ablation between the two groups. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. Fifty patients had LVA (22 and 28 patients in the linear and LVA groups). The roof and MVI lines were completed in 100% and 96.9% of the patients. During the mean follow-up of 279.5 ± 161.3 days, the LVA group had significantly lower recurrence than the linear group (15 patients [23%] vs. 29 patients [45%], p = 0.014). Thirty-five patients were prescribed antiarrhythmic drugs during the follow-up period (linear group, n = 17; LVA group, n = 18); amiodarone and bepridil were administered to most of the patients (15 and 17 patients, respectively). The difference in the prognosis was relevant among the patients with LVA, while this trend was not observed in those without LVA. The LVA ablation group demonstrated significantly lower radiofrequency energy and shorter procedural time compared to the linear ablation group. The recurrence of atrial flutter was more likely to occur in the linear group than in the LVA group (14 [22%] vs. 6 [9.4%], p = 0.052). CONCLUSION: The electrophysiological-guided LVA ablation is more effective than empirical linear ablation in PeAF patients with LVA. Unnecessary empirical linear ablation might have a risk of iatrogenic gap and atrial flutter recurrence.

The coronary artery calcium score correlates with left atrial low-voltage area: Sex differences.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with coronary artery disease, a high coronary artery calcium score (CACS) correlates with atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the association between left atrial (LA) remodeling progression and coronary arteriosclerosis is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between LA remodeling progression and the CACS. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 148 patients with AF (paroxysmal AF, n = 94) who underwent catheter ablation. Voltage mapping for the left atrium and coronary computed tomography for CACS calculations were performed. The ratio of the LA low-voltage area (LA-LVA), defined by values less than 0.5 mV divided by the total LA surface without pulmonary veins, was calculated. Patients with LA-LVA (<0.5 mV) >5% and ≤5% were classified as the LVA (n = 30) and non-LVA (n = 118) groups, respectively. Patient characteristics and CACS values were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: LA volume, age, CHA2 DS2 VASc score, and percentage of female patients were significantly higher, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower in the LVA group than in the non-LVA group. The CACS was significantly higher in the LVA group (248.4 vs. 13.2; p = .001). Multivariate analysis identified the LA volume index and CACS as independent predictors of LA-LVA (<0.5 mV) greater than 5%. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for predicting LA-LVA (<0.5 mV) greater than 5% with CACS were 0.695 in the entire population, 0.782 in men, and 0.587 in women. CONCLUSION: Progression of LA remodeling and coronary artery calcification may occur in parallel. A high CACS may indicate advanced LA remodeling, especially in men.

Left atrial phasic transport function closely correlates with fibrotic and arrhythmogenic atrial tissue degeneration in atrial fibrillation patients: cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking and voltage mapping.

AIMS: To characterize the association of phasic left atrial (LA) transport function and LA fibrosis guided by multimodality imaging containing cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) feature tracking and bipolar voltage mapping. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients presenting for first-time ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) were prospectively enrolled. Each patient underwent CMR prior to the ablation procedure. LA phasic indexed volumes (LA-Vi) and emptying fractions (LA-EF) were calculated and CMR feature tracking guided LA wall motion analysis was performed. LA bipolar voltage mapping was carried out in sinus rhythm to find areas of low voltage as a surrogate for fibrosis and arrhythmogenesis. One hundred and sixty-eight patients were enrolled. Low-voltage areas (LVAs) were present in 70 patients (42%). Contrary to LA volume, CMR based LA-EF [odds ratio (OR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-0.96, P = 0.005] and LA booster pump strain rate (SR) (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99, P = 0.001) significantly predicted presence and extent of LVA in multivariate logistic regression analysis for patients scanned in SR. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, LA-EF <40% carried a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 76% (area under the curve 0.8; 95% CI 0.71-0.89) to predict presence of LVA. For patients scanned in AF only minimal LA-Vi on CMR (OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02-1.10; P = 0.002) predicted presence of LVA. CONCLUSION: For patients scanned in SR LA-EF and LA booster pump SR are closely linked to the presence and extent of LA LVA.

Discrepancy between CARTO and Rhythmia maps for defining the left atrial low-voltage areas in atrial fibrillation ablation.

Reported mapping procedures of left atrial (LA) low-voltage areas (LVAs) vary widely. This study aimed to compare the PentaRay®/CARTO®3 (PentaRay map) and Orion™/Rhythmia™ (Orion map) systems for LA voltage mapping. This study included 15 patients who underwent successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation. After PVI, PentaRay and Orion maps created for all patients were compared. LVAs were defined as sites with ≥ 3 adjacent low-voltage points < 0.5 mV. LVAs were indicated in 8 (53%) among 15 patients, and the average values of the measured LVAs was comparable between the systems (PentaRay map = 5.4 ± 8.7 cm2; Orion map = 4.3 ± 6.4 cm2, p = 0.69). However, in 2 of 8 patients with LVAs, the Orion map indicated LVAs at the septum and posterolateral sites of the LA, respectively, whereas the PentaRay map indicated no LVAs. In those patients, sharp electrograms of > 0.5 mV were properly recorded at the septum and posterolateral sites during appropriate beats in the PentaRay map. The PentaRay map had a shorter procedure time than the Orion map (12 ± 3 min vs. 23 ± 8 min, respectively; p < 0.01). Our study results showed a discrepancy in the LVA evaluation between the PentaRay and Orion maps. In 2 of 15 patients, the Orion map indicated LVAs at the sites where > 0.5-mV electrograms were properly recorded in the PentaRay map.

Slow whole left atrial conduction velocity after pulmonary vein isolation predicts atrial fibrillation recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Atrial conduction velocity may represent atrial fibrillation (AF) substrate after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). To elucidate the association between whole left atrial conduction velocity (LACV) and AF recurrence after PVI. METHODS AND RESULTS: This observational study enrolled 279 patients (147 paroxysmal and 132 persistent AF) who underwent PVI alone as an initial AF ablation procedure. After PVI, the left atrium was mapped with a 20-pole multielectrode in conjunction with the CARTO3 system during 100-ppm right atrial pacing. Left atrial conduction distance and conduction time were calculated from the start to the end of the propagation wave front in the left atrium. LACVs on the anterior and posterior routes were calculated as conduction distance divided by conduction time. Anterior and posterior LACVs were slower in patients with AF recurrence than in those without (anterior, 0.79 [0.71, 0.86] vs 0.96 [0.90, 1.06] m/s, P < .001; posterior, 0.99 [0.89, 1.14] vs 1.10 [1.00, 1.29] m/s, P < .001). AF recurrence was best predicted by anterior LACV with a cut-off value of 0.87 m/s (sensitivity 87%, specificity 81%, and predictive accuracy 84%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a slow anterior LACV <0.87 m/s was an independent predictor of AF recurrence with an adjusted hazard ratio of 11.8 (6.36-22.0). Patients with anterior low-voltage areas demonstrated slower anterior LACV than those without low-voltage areas (0.89 [0.71, 1.00] vs 0.94 [0.87, 1.05] m/s, P < .001). CONCLUSION: A slow anterior LACV was an excellent predictor of AF recurrence after PVI.

Is the abnormal conduction zone of the left atrium a precursor to a low voltage area in patients with atrial fibrillation?

BACKGROUND: The abnormal conduction zone (ACZ) in the left atrium (LA) has attracted attention as an arrhythmia source in atrial fibrillation (AF). We investigated the hypothesis that the ACZ is related to the low voltage area (LVA) or the LA anatomical contact areas (CoAs) with other organs. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 100 patients (49 non-paroxysmal AF, 66 males, and 67.9 ± 9.9 years) who received catheter ablation for AF. High-density LA mapping during high right atrial pacing was constructed. Isochronal activation maps were created at 5-ms interval setting, and the ACZ was identified on the activation map by locating a site with isochronal crowding of ≥3 isochrones, which are calculated as ≤27 cm/s. The LVA was defined as the following; mild ( < 1.3 mV), moderate (<1.0 mV), and severe LVA (<0.5 mV). The CoAs (ascending aorta-anterior LA, descending aorta-posterior LA, and vertebrae-posterior LA) were assessed using computed tomography. The ACZ was linearly distributed, and observed in 95 patients (95%). The ACZ was most frequently observed in the anterior wall region (77%). A longer ACZ was significantly associated with a larger LA size and a prevalence of non-PAF. The 51.2 ± 36.2% of ACZ overlapped with mild LVA, 32.9 ± 32.8% of ACZ with moderate LVA, and 14.6 ± 22.0% of ACZ with severe LVA. In contrast, only 25.6 ± 28.0% of ACZ matched with the CoAs. CONCLUSION: The ACZ reflects LA electrical remodeling and may be a precursor finding of the low voltage zone and not the LA CoAs in patients with atrial fibrillation.

P-wave vector magnitude predicts the left atrial low-voltage area in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: P-wave amplitude (PWA) parameters can be the surrogate measures of the left atrial low-voltage areas (LVAs). METHODS: We measured PWAs using an automated system in 50 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). We examined the relationships between left atrial LVAs and PWA parameters, including P-wave vector magnitude, calculated as the square root of the sum of lead II PWA squared, lead V6 PWA squared, and a one-half lead V2 PWA squared. RESULTS: Lead I PWA was most strongly correlated with LVAs in the anterior wall and appendage (anterior wall, R = -0.391, P = 0.006; appendage, R = -0.342, P = 0.016), whereas lead II PWA was most strongly correlated with LVAs in the septum, posterior wall, and bottom wall (septum, R = -0.413, P = 0.003; posterior wall, R = -0.297, P = 0.039; bottom wall; R = -0.288, P = 0.045). Although maximum, minimum, mean, and lead I PWAs were not correlated with total LVA, P-wave vector magnitude and lead II PWA were significantly correlated with total LVA (P-wave vector magnitude, R = -0.430, P = 0.002; lead II PWA, R = -0.323, P = 0.023). P-wave vector magnitude achieved the highest accuracy for predicting significant LVA (total LVA > 10%) with an area under the curve of 0.772; sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 64%, 88%, 85%, and 69%, respectively, for the cutoff value of 0.130 mV. CONCLUSION: P-wave vector magnitude is a useful electrocardiographic predictor of left atrial LVAs.

A specific combination of P wave duration and morphology accurately predicts the presence of left atrial low voltage area in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Since low voltage area (LVA) impairs not only intra atrial conduction velocity but also intra atrial propagate direction, these alternates may reflect the P wave duration (PWD) and morphology. We examined the relationship between the PWD, morphology and LVA. METHODS: Consecutive 127 AF patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the presence of LVA (35 subjects LVA positive group, 92 subjects LVA negative group). P wave morphologies were divided into 3 categories, normal: P-wave duration<120 ms, partial interatrial block (IAB): P wave duration≥120 ms, advanced IAB: PWD ≥ 120 ms with biphasic P waves in inferior leads. LVA was defined as a voltage amplitude<0.5 mV, and qualitatively assessed to be categorized into three grades (mild<10%, 10% ≤ moderate<30%, 30% ≤ extensive). RESULTS: LVA was significantly highly detected in patients of advanced age, female, comorbidities of hypertension, prior brain infarction, LA enlargement. PWD was correlated with LA volume in the LVA negative group, but not in the LVA positive group. Advanced IAB was significantly accumulated in the LVA positive group while partial IAB was found in both LVA positive and negative groups. Receiver-operating characteristics curve revealed that a combination of IAB and biphasic P wave in any inferior lead identified the presence of LVA with 83% sensitivity and 98% specificity. PWD and the presence of advanced IAB were independent predictors of LVA as determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Advanced IAB is a favorable parameter for the presence of LVA.

Left atrial voltage mapping with a direction-independent grid catheter: Comparison with a conventional circular mapping catheter.

INTRODUCTION: A recently introduced grid mapping catheter (GMC) is designed for better electrode-tissue contact and can collect bipolar signals both along and across the splines, which may allow more efficient voltage map generation independent of propagation direction. We compared the GMC with a conventional circular mapping catheter (CMC) for left atrial (LA) voltage mapping. METHODS: This study included 20 consecutive patients undergoing repeat ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation who had demonstrated LA low-voltage areas (LVAs, <0.10 mV). Following pulmonary vein isolation, LA voltage mapping was performed twice, once using the GMC and once using the CMC. RESULTS: Voltage mapping was more efficient using the GMC than the CMC in terms of mapping time (459 [404, 543] vs 602 [496, 814] seconds; P = .014) and the number of mapping points (2446 [2099, 3104] vs 1841 [1494, 2314]; P = .002). The incidence of catheter-induced ectopies was lower (44 [28, 62] vs 114 [74, 188]; P < .0001) using the GMC. The GMC utilizing all bipoles detected LVAs in 85% of patients with LVAs detected by CMC. LVA measurements were significantly smaller on maps generated by the GMC using bipoles along or across the splines than those measured with the CMC (11.1 [4.6, 17.2] or 9.7 [2.5, 16.0] vs 16.4 [6.8, 26.8] cm2 ; P = .008 and P = .001, respectively), and were even smaller when using all bipoles (7.9 [1.1, 13.5] cm2 , P = .0001). CONCLUSION: The GMC allowed a more efficient mapping procedure and enabled more selective identification of LVAs with smaller LVA size.

Impact of Renal Dysfunction on Left Atrial Low-Voltage Areas in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The presence of residual left atrial low-voltage areas (LVA) has been shown to be strongly associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation. A preliminary study showed that concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD) increased the rate of AF recurrence. The association between CKD and LVA, however, has not been elucidated. In the present study, we investigated the association between CKD severity and LVA prevalence. Methods and Results: In total, 183 consecutive AF patients who underwent initial ablation for AF were enrolled in this retrospective observational study. Serum cystatin C before ablation was measured, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated. LVA were defined as sites of left atrial electrogram amplitude <0.5 mV. Of 183 patients, 76 (42%) had LVA. Patients with LVA had lower eGFR calculated using cystatin C (74±22 vs. 86±24 mL/min/1.73 m2, P=0.001). The optimal cut-off of the calculated eGFR was 71.5 mL/min/1.73 m2, corresponding to a 79.4% sensitivity, 50% specificity, and 67.2% predictive accuracy. LVA occurred more frequently in patients with more severe categories of CKD. On multivariate analysis, eGFR <71.5 mL/min/1.73 m2was an independent predictor of LVA (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% CI: 1.4-7.8; P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: CKD severity was correlated with left atrial LVA prevalence in patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation.