Natural History, Pathophysiology, and Recent Management Modalities of Intraventricular Hemorrhage.

Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is a clinical challenge observed among 40-45% of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) cases. IVH can be classified according to the source of the hemorrhage into primary and secondary IVH. Primary intraventricular hemorrhage (PIVH), unlike secondary IVH, involves only the ventricles with no hemorrhagic parenchymal source. Several risk factors of PIVH were reported which include hypertension, smoking, age, and excessive alcohol consumption. IVH is associated with high mortality and morbidity and several prognostic factors were identified such as IVH volume, number of ventricles with blood, involvement of fourth ventricle, baseline Glasgow Coma Scale score, and hydrocephalus. Prompt management of patients with IVH is required to stabilize the clinical status of patients upon admission. Nevertheless, further advanced management is crucial to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with intraventricular bleeding. Recent treatments showed promising outcomes in the management of IVH patients such as intraventricular anti-inflammatory drugs, lumbar drainage, and endoscopic evacuation of IVH, however, their safety and efficacy are still in question. This literature review presents the epidemiology, physiopathology, risk factors, and outcomes of IVH in adults with an emphasis on recent treatment options.

Invasive Pressure Monitors: Leveling the Playing Field.

Invasive pressure monitors are ubiquitous in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia. This technology allows beat-to-beat assessment of central venous, pulmonary, and arterial blood pressures during surgery, procedural interventions, and critical care. Education is commonly focused on the procedural aspects and the complications associated with the initial placement of these monitors without instruction on the technical concepts required for obtaining accurate data. Anesthesiologists must understand the fundamental concepts on which measurements are made to effectively use invasive pressure monitors, including pulmonary artery catheters, central venous catheters, intra-arterial catheters, external ventricular drains, and spinal or lumbar drains. This review will address important gaps in knowledge surrounding leveling and zeroing of invasive pressure monitors, emphasizing the impact of varied practice patterns on patient care.

Continuous lumbar drainage after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage decreased malondialdehyde in cerebrospinal fluid and improved outcome.

PURPOSE: The use of a continuous lumbar drain (LD) for the treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), and malondialdehyde (MDA), a marker of oxidative stress, is correlated with clinical outcome. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between LD placement and MDA level after aSAH. METHODS: Patients with modified Fisher's grade III and IV aSAH who underwent early aneurysm obliteration were enrolled. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was obtained on day 7 after aSAH in non-LD group. In LD group, the LD was inserted on day 3 after aSAH for continuous CSF drainage. The levels of intrathecal hemoglobin, total bilirubin, ferritin, and MDA were measured. RESULTS: There were 41 patients in non-LD group (age: 58.7 ± 13.7 years; female: 61.0%) and 48 patients in LD group (age: 58.3 ± 10.4 years; female: 79.2%). There were more favorable outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale ≥4) at 3 months after aSAH in LD group (p = 0.0042). The intrathecal hemoglobin, total bilirubin, ferritin, and MDA levels at day 7 after aSAH were all significantly lower in LD group. An older age (>60 years) (p = 0.0293), higher MDA level in the CSF (p = 0.0208), and delayed ischemic neurological deficit (p = 0.0451) were independent factors associated with unfavorable outcomes. LD placement was associated with a decreased intrathecal MDA level on day 7 after aSAH (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The intrathecal MDA level at day 7 after aSAH can be an effective outcome indicator in modified Fisher's grade III/IV aSAH. Continuous CSF drainage via a LD can decrease the intrathecal MDA level and improve the functional outcome.

Predictive value of quantitative pupillometry in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus undergoing temporary CSF diversion.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar drain (LD) trials are used to temporarily divert CSF in order to predict clinical improvement prior to definitive CSF diversion in patients with a diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus. New technology has improved clinical detection of subtle pupillary changes that may occur during CSF diversion trials. The aim of this study was to determine whether pupillary light response as recorded by automated pupillometry could be used to predict response during lumbar drain trials. METHODS: The authors prospectively gathered quantitative pupillometry data on admission and following each CSF diversion in a cohort of 30 consecutive patients with a presumptive diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus admitted to a university hospital for elective LD trial between January 1, 2020 and March 30, 2021. The value of pupillometry in predicting success of lumbar drainage in alleviating symptoms was correlated to clinical improvement during lumbar drainage. RESULTS: Of the 29 patients undergoing a 4-day LD trial, 16 (55.2%) demonstrated clinical improvement. Pre-drainage pupillometry values did not differ between patients who had clinical improvement or no clinical improvement. Constriction velocity improved compared to baseline in patients who had a successful lumbar drain trial (LD +). There was a non-significant trend towards improved constriction velocity and improved dilation velocity found in patients even after the first aliquot drainage. DISCUSSION: Baseline pupillary function by automated pupillometry did not predict clinical improvement during lumbar drain trials. Improvement in constriction and dilation velocity may be useful to monitor at the outset, after the initial drainage, and at completion of lumbar drain trials.

Update on intrathecal management of cerebral vasospasm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) accounts for a relatively small portion of strokes but has the potential to cause permanent neurological deficits. Vasospasm with delayed ischemic neurological deficit is thought to be responsible for much of the morbidity associated with aSAH. This has illuminated some treatment options that have the potential to target specific components of the vasospasm cascade. Intrathecal management via lumbar drain (LD) or external ventricular drain (EVD) offers unique advantages in this patient population. The aim of this review was to provide an update on intrathecal vasospasm treatments, emphasizing the need for larger-scale trials and updated protocols using data-driven evidence. METHODS: A search of PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases included the search terms (subarachnoid hemorrhage) AND (vasospasm OR delayed cerebral ischemia) AND (intrathecal OR intraventricular OR lumbar drain OR lumbar catheter) for 2010 to the present. Next, a meta-analysis was performed of select therapeutic regimens. The primary endpoints of analysis were vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), cerebral infarction, and functional outcome. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies were included in the analysis. There were 10 studies in which CSF drainage was the primary experimental group. Calcium channel antagonists were the focus of 7 studies. Fibrinolytics and other vasodilators were each examined in 6 studies. The meta-analysis included studies examining CSF drainage via LD (n = 4), tissue plasminogen activator in addition to EVD (n = 3), intraventricular nimodipine (n = 2), and cisternal magnesium (n = 2). Results showed that intraventricular nimodipine decreased vasospasm (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.94; p = 0.03). Therapies that significantly reduced DCI were CSF drainage via LD (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.88; p = 0.02) and cisternal magnesium (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.07-1.02; p = 0.05). CSF drainage via LD was also found to significantly reduce the incidence of cerebral infarction (OR 0.35, 95% 0.24-0.51; p < 0.001). Lastly, functional outcome was significantly better in patients who received CSF drainage via LD (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.39-4.21; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The authors' results showed that intrathecal therapy is a safe and feasible option following aSAH. It has been shown to attenuate cerebral vasospasm, reduce the incidence of DCI, and improve clinical outcome. The authors support the use of intrathecal management in the prevention and rescue management of cerebral vasospasm. More randomized controlled trials are warranted to determine the best combination of pharmaceutical agents and administration route in order to formulate a standardized treatment approach.

Complications associated with lumbar drain placement for endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: We reviewed the complications associated with perioperative lumbar drain (LD) placement for endovascular aortic repair. METHODS: Patients who had undergone perioperative LD placement for endovascular repair of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic pathologies from 2010 to 2019 were reviewed. The primary endpoints were major and minor LD-associated complications. Complications that had resulted in neurological sequelae or had required an intervention or a delay in operation were defined as major. These included intracranial hemorrhage, symptomatic spinal hematoma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak requiring intervention, meningitis, retained catheter tip, arachnoiditis, and traumatic (or bloody) tap resulting in delayed operation. Minor complications were defined as a bloody tap without a delay in surgery, asymptomatic epidural hematoma, and CSF leak with no intervention required. Isolated headaches were recorded separately owing to the minimal clinical impact. RESULTS: A total of 309 LDs had been placed in 268 consecutive patients for 222 thoracic endovascular aortic repairs, 85 complex endovascular aortic repairs (EVARs; fenestrated branched EVAR/parallel grafting), and 2 EVARs (age, 65 ± 13 years; 71% male) for aortic pathology, including aneurysm (47%), dissection (49%), penetrating aortic ulcer (3%), and traumatic injury (0.6%). A dedicated neurosurgical team performed all LD procedures; most were performed by the same individual, with a technical success rate of 98%. Radiologic guidance was required in 3%. The reasons for unsuccessful placement were body habitus (n = 2) and severe spinal disease (n = 3). Most were placed prophylactically (96%). The overall complication rate was 8.1% (4.2% major and 3.9% minor). Major complications included spinal hematoma with paraplegia in 1 patient, intracranial hemorrhage in 2, meningitis in 2, arachnoiditis in 3, CSF leak requiring a blood patch in 3, bloody tap delaying the operation in 1, and a retained catheter tip in 1 patient. Patients who had undergone previous LD placement had experienced significantly more major LD-related complications (12.2% vs 3%; P = .019). The rate of total LD-associated complications did not differ between prophylactic and emergent therapeutic placements (8.1% vs 7.7%; P = 1.00) nor between major or minor complications. On multivariate analysis, previous LD placement and an overweight body mass index were the only independent predictors of major LD-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: The complications associated with LD placement can be severe even when performed by a dedicated team. Previous LD placement and overweight body mass index were associated with a significantly greater risk of complications; however, emergent therapeutic placement was not. Although these risks are justified for therapeutic LD placement, the benefit of prophylactic LD placement to prevent paraplegia should be weighed against these serious complications.

Continuous dural suturing for closure of grade 3 leaks after tumor removal via an endoscopic endonasal approach.

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a major complication after extended endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETSS), which is commonly used in the treatment of anterior skull base tumors. Dural suturing and graded reconstruction are promising techniques to further decrease the incidence of postoperative CSF (poCSF) leakage. The effect of continuous dural suturing in endoscopic surgery was investigated in this retrospective study. A total of 79 EETSS patients were included; the procedures were performed for subdural tumor removal by a single endoscopic neurosurgical team. Comparisons were applied between patients who did and did not undergo endoscopic dural suturing after tumor removal. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables that significantly influenced the incidence of poCSF leakage. In all, 79 adult patients developed Esposito's grade 3 intraoperative high-flow CSF leakage. Ten patients (12.7%) experienced poCSF leakage. One of the 36 patients who underwent intraoperative dural suturing developed poCSF leakage, compared with nine of 43 patients who did not undergo dural suturing (p = 0.016). Regression analysis showed that dural suturing could significantly decrease the incidence of poCSF leakage (p = 0.049, OR 0.108, 95% CI 0.013-0.899). Prophylactic lumbar drainage could also help decrease the CSF leakage rate. Dural suturing under endoscopy is a promising and effective method for application in skull base reconstruction after subdural skull base tumor removal. With future progress, lumbar drainage and even nasoseptal flap placement could be replaced in certain groups of patients undergoing EETSS.

The Use of Cangrelor Infusions After Endovascular Aortic Repair With Prophylactic Lumbar Drain Placement.

Perioperative lumbar drains commonly are placed for spinal cord protection in patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair. However, the logistics of postoperative neuraxial drain removal is challenging in the presence of systemic antithrombotic therapy. This retrospective case series describes the novel use of cangrelor infusions in this high-risk setting. All lumbar drains were placed preoperatively, and descriptive data were collected including cangrelor infusion duration, time to lumbar drain removal after the infusion discontinuation, clinical course, and overall patient outcomes. There were no neurologic complications associated with lumbar drain insertion or removal, and median time to lumbar drain removal was 150 minutes after cangrelor infusion discontinuation. While further study is needed to validate its efficacy and safety, this case series highlights the promise of cangrelor infusions for systemic antithrombotic therapy in the cardiovascular/surgical intensive care unit.

The Evolution and Future of Spinal Drains for Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Review.

For decades, spinal drains for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure monitoring and drainage have been used as adjuncts to protect against spinal cord injury resulting from thoracic aortic aneurysm repair. There are many different approaches to placement and management of CSF drains, with no true consensus on best practice. Furthermore, the incidence of complications resulting from spinal drains largely has been stagnant. This review describes the history and rationale behind placement of CSF drains, explore various considerations, techniques, and equipment, and discuss potential considerations for developing more comprehensive protocols.

Telemetric monitoring in idiopathic intracranial hypertension demonstrates intracranial pressure in a case with sight-threatening disease.

The understanding of raised intracranial pressure (ICP) is increasing with the directed use of intracranial telemetric ICP monitors. This case uniquely observed ICP changes by telemetric monitoring in a patient with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), who developed rapid sight-threatening disease. A lumbar drain was inserted, as a temporising measure, and was clamped prior to surgery. This resulted in a rapid rise in ICP, which normalised after insertion of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. This case highlighted the utility of the ICP monitor and the lumbar drain as a temporising measure to control ICP prior to a definitive procedure as recommended by the IIH consensus guidelines.

Guidelines on the use of external ventricular drain and its associated complications: do we "AGREE II"?

Insertion of an external ventricular drain is a common procedure used in everyday practice by neurosurgeons all around the world. It consists of the placement of an external ventricular drain (EVD) into the ventricular system providing the ability to measure intracranial pressure, and also divert the flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in a variety of pathological conditions. The most common complication is infection, and it may result in devastating consequences and negatively affect the outcome of these patients. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the Neurocritical Care Society (NCS), and The Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology & Critical Care (SNACC) have published recommendations for the management of EVD-Associated Ventriculitis. The objective of this study was to assess the methodological quality and reporting clarity of these recommendations using the AGREE-II tool. We found that the overall quality of the published clinical practice guidelines is acceptable. However, continuous updates and external validation should be implemented.

Lumbar drain complications in patients undergoing fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: Development of an institutional protocol for lumbar drain management.

OBJECTIVE: Lumbar drain placement with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage is an effective adjunct for reducing the risk of spinal cord ischemia in patients undergoing complex aortic aneurysm repair. However, lumbar drain placement is a challenging procedure with potential for significant complications. We sought to characterize complications of lumbar drain placement in a large, single-center experience of patients who underwent fenestrated or branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR). METHODS: All patients who underwent F/BEVAR and attempted lumbar drain placement from 2010 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. All lumbar drains were placed by four cardiovascular anesthesiologists who compose the complex aortic anesthesia team. Lumbar drain placement was guided by a set protocol and used whenever the aortic stent graft coverage was planned to extend more proximal than 40 mm above the celiac artery. Details relating to lumbar drain placement, management, and frequency and type of associated complications were characterized. RESULTS: During the study period, 256 patients underwent F/BEVAR, of whom 100 (39%) were planned for lumbar drain placement. Successful placement occurred in 98 (98%) of the cases. All lumbar drains were placed before induction of general anesthesia, using fluoroscopy guidance in 28 cases (28%). The most common level of placement was L4-5 (n = 42 [42%]). The majority (n = 82 [82%]) were left in place ≤48 hours; 21% were removed during the first 24 hours, and 61% were removed between 24 and 48 hours. Nonfunctionality was the most common complication, occurring in 16 (16%) patients. Catheter dislodgment or fracture, CSF leak, and postdural puncture headache were observed in 4 (4%), 7 (7%), and 4 (4%) patients, respectively. The most common bleeding complication was the presence of asymptomatic blood in the CSF (n = 11 [11%]), whereas subarachnoid hemorrhage combined with intraventricular hemorrhage occurred in three patients (3%); none of these patients required surgical drainage or intervention. No infectious complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar drain placement for CSF drainage is a commonly employed adjunct to prevent spinal cord ischemia in F/BEVAR. Our experience demonstrates that lumbar drain placement can be performed successfully but is associated with a significant rate of nonfunctionality and a diverse range of complications that, fortunately, do not commonly have significant long-term sequelae.

Development of a Lumbar Drain Simulator for Instructional Technique and Skill Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Medical simulation for the teaching of procedural skills to health-care providers is an effective method of instruction to improve safety, quality, and procedural efficiency. There are several commercially available simulators for lumbar puncture training; however, there is currently no model available for lumbar drain intrathecal catheter placement. METHODS: A modular lumbar drain simulator was assembled with the use of a spine model, ballstical gel, and Penrose drain tubing to recreate the procedural steps and tactile feedback of a live lumbar drain insertion. RESULTS: The assembled simulator demonstrated the ability to provide users with manual feeback of a "pop" sensation when intrathecal puncture was achieved with a 14 gauge Touhy needle, as well as spontaneous CSF flow. A silastic catheter was able to be inserted into the simulated subarachnoid space in the same manner as a live procedure. CONCLUSIONS: A high-fidelity lumbar drain simulator can be constructed in a cost-effective manner. We have detailed the materials and assembly of our successful design in order to provide a novel educational tool for procedural instruction and practice.

Lumbar drains: Practical understanding and application for the otolaryngologist.

INTRODUCTION: Lumbar drains are frequently used in patients with otolaryngologic concerns. These can be used therapeutically or prophylactically with the primary purpose being to modulate CSF pressure. Within otolaryngology, lumbar drains are most frequently used for cerebrospinal fluid leaks - either due to cerebrospinal fluid fistulas or in skull base surgery as these allow for potential healing of the defect. While not typically placed by otolaryngologists, a basic understanding of lumbar drains is beneficial in the context of patient management. MANAGEMENT: A lumbar drain is inserted into the intrathecal space in a patient's lumbar spine. Though considered to be a benign procedure, complications are relatively frequent, and adjustment or replacement of the drain may be required. Complications include infection, epidural bleeding, retained hardware, sequelae of relative immobility, or may relate to over-drainage, ranging from mild headache to cranial neuropathies, altered mental status, pneumocephalus, intracranial hemorrhage, and death. While in place, neurologic exams should be performed routinely and should include motor and sensory exams of the lower extremities. A patient should be monitored for fevers, nuchal rigidity, and other signs of infection or meningitis. The CSF fluid should be grossly examined to identify changes, but routine laboratory tests are not typically run on the fluid itself. Drainage rates will vary usually between 5 and 20 mL per hour and must be frequently reassessed and adjusted based upon signs of intracranial hypotension. Drains should be removed when appropriate and should not be left in more than 5 days due to the increased infectious risk. CONCLUSION: Lumbar drains are important tools used in patients with otolaryngologic pathologies. Otolaryngologists and otolaryngology residents should be familiar with these catheters to determine if they are working correctly and to identify adverse effects as early as possible.

Risk factors and outcomes of cerebrospinal fluid leak related to endoscopic pituitary adenoma surgery.

Objective: The incidence of and risk factors for intra- and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (poCSF) leak in patients who underwent endoscopic surgery for pituitary adenoma were investigated in this retrospective study.Methods: A total of 216 consecutive patients operated on by a single neurosurgical team were included. Logistic regression was applied to identify risk factors for intraoperative CSF (ioCSF) and poCSF leaks, and the outcome and management of ioCSF and poCSF leaks were analyzed.Results: Sixty-five patients (30.1%) experienced ioCSF leak, of whom 10 developed poCSF leak. Three of 151 patients developed poCSF leak without obvious ioCSF leak. Multiple regression analysis revealed that tumor with lobular or irregular contour and gonadotrophic-positive staining increased the risk of ioCSF leak; additionally, nonfunctional tumor (p = 0.058) and preoperative gonadotrophic hormone abnormalities (p = 0.08) tended to increase this risk. The presence of ioCSF leak and preoperative visual impairment were predictors for poCSF leak. Tumor with Knosp grades 3-4 and a higher grade of ioCSF leak could increase the risk of poCSF leak. Tailored pedicled vascularized nasoseptal flaps (NSFs) preparation before tumor removal greatly decreased the rate of poCSF leak with ioCSF leak and the overall leak rate. Three prophylactic lumbar drains (LDs) were performed in patients with grade 3 ioCSF leak, none of whom developed poCSF leak.Conclusions: Lobular or irregular tumor contour and gonadotrophic-positive staining were associated with a high risk of ioCSF leak, while ioCSF leak and preoperative visual impairment were associated with poCSF leak. NSF preparation, preventive sellar reconstruction and LD use could likely decrease the rate of poCSF leak.

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with lumbar drainage and surgery: coincidence or correlation? A case report.

BACKGROUND: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a rare neurological disorder usually associated with specific medical conditions that cause a disturbance of the CNS homeostasis. It has seldom been reported to be a consequence of an iatrogenic intervention causing intracranial hypotension. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of an individual 69-year-old male presenting with headache and blurred vision following cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak from resection of a sellar mass. The patient developed the condition following removal of the lumbar drain post-operatively. Magnetic Resonance Imaging showed bilateral occipital, parieto-occipital, and cerebellar T2 FLAIR hyper-intensities, suggesting a radiological diagnosis of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). The patient's symptoms started to improve shortly afterwards and had completely resolved at 3 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of severe hypertension and presence of an intraoperative CSF leak requiring placement of the lumbar drain suggests that decreased CSF volume and associated reactive hyperemia could have a role in the pathophysiology of the disease.

Contemporary Single-Center Experience With Prophylactic Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage for Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Patients at High Risk for Ischemic Spinal Cord Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To review rates of permanent paraplegia and lumbar drain-related complications in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) surgery with prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage at the authors' institution. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care, academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent TEVAR with a high risk for ischemic spinal cord injury and prophylactic lumbar CSF drainage over a 5-year period. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred and two patients underwent TEVAR with lumbar CSF drainage. Thirty-day mortality was 5.9%, and the rate of permanent paraplegia was 2%. Drain complications occurred in 4 (3.9%) patients, but no patient experienced permanent injury related to CSF drainage. Two patients in the cohort had complete resolution of paraplegia with increased CSF drainage and mean arterial blood pressure increases aimed to increase spinal cord perfusion pressure by 25%. A third patient experienced improvement in lower extremity strength but remained paraplegic, and a fourth patient demonstrated no improvement in symptoms. The 6 patients taking clopidogrel experienced no bleeding complications, and there were no apparent risk factors for bleeding in the 5 patients who had bloody drain output or in 1 patient who developed an epidural hematoma. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic CSF drainage was associated with low paraplegia and drain-related complication rates. These data further support the safety of prophylactic CSF drainage in patients undergoing TEVAR with a high risk for ischemic spinal cord injury.

Cerebrospinal fluid leaks in extended endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery: covering all the angles.

Following extended endoscopic transsphenoidal approach (EETSA), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak rate has been reported in the range of 5-50 %. Novel closure techniques, such as the nasoseptal flap and other multilayered repairs improved the outcomes significantly but took most of our focus. Little attention, however, was given to other aspects of the equation such as nasal support-to support the heavy weight of such repairs-and lumbar drains. These are important because they diminish the forces acting on both sides of the repair, hence covering all the angles. We reviewed data of 98 consecutive patients who underwent an EETSA between 1999 and 2014. We analyzed the rates of CSF leak throughout the years and with every modification added to our closure technique. Common pathologies encountered were invasive adenomas, meningiomas, chordomas, and craniopharyngiomas. CSF leak occurred overall in five patients (5.1 %). The nasoseptal flap decreased the rate of CSF leak but not significantly (P = 0.112), while placing a nasal trumpet to support our repair resulted in significant decrease in CSF leak rate (P = 0.0013). In the last 2 years of our series, when all modifications took place and all angles were covered, there was one leak in 35 cases (2.8 %). A protocol that covers all the angles by a good multilayered repair (regardless of its type and materials) while diminishing the forces acting on both sides of the repair leads to a minimal rate of CSF leak. No principle alone is effective individually.