MDM2-Mediated Ubiquitination of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Contributes to the Development of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) converts angiotensin II, a potent vasoconstrictor, to angiotensin-(1-7) and is also a membrane protein that enables coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infectivity. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) phosphorylation of ACE2 enhances ACE2 stability. This mode of posttranslational modification of ACE2 in vascular endothelial cells is causative of a pulmonary hypertension (PH)-protective phenotype. The oncoprotein MDM2 (murine double minute 2) is an E3 ligase that ubiquitinates its substrates to cause their degradation. In this study, we investigated whether MDM2 is involved in the posttranslational modification of ACE2 through its ubiquitination of ACE2, and whether an AMPK and MDM2 crosstalk regulates the pathogenesis of PH. METHODS: Bioinformatic analyses were used to explore E3 ligase that ubiquitinates ACE2. Cultured endothelial cells, mouse models, and specimens from patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension were used to investigate the crosstalk between AMPK and MDM2 in regulating ACE2 phosphorylation and ubiquitination in the context of PH. RESULTS: Levels of MDM2 were increased and those of ACE2 decreased in lung tissues or pulmonary arterial endothelial cells from patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension and rodent models of experimental PH. MDM2 inhibition by JNJ-165 reversed the SU5416/hypoxia-induced PH in C57BL/6 mice. ACE2-S680L mice (dephosphorylation at S680) showed PH susceptibility, and ectopic expression of ACE2-S680L/K788R (deubiquitination at K788) reduced experimental PH. Moreover, ACE2-K788R overexpression in mice with endothelial cell-specific AMPKα2 knockout mitigated PH. CONCLUSIONS: Maladapted posttranslational modification (phosphorylation and ubiquitination) of ACE2 at Ser-680 and Lys-788 is involved in the pathogenesis of pulmonary arterial hypertension and experimental PH. Thus, a combined intervention of AMPK and MDM2 in the pulmonary endothelium might be therapeutically effective in PH treatment.

The Utility of MDM2 and CDK4 Immunohistochemistry and MDM2 FISH in Craniofacial Osteosarcoma.

Craniofacial osteosarcoma is rare (2-10% of all osteosarcomas). Most low grade fibroblastic osteosarcomas of the long bones are characterized by amplification of chromosome12q including MDM2 and CDK4 genes. This study aims to investigate the utility of MDM2 and CDK4 immunostains as well as MDM2 FISH in craniofacial osteosarcomas as a means of distinguishing them from benign fibro-osseous lesions. Cases of primary osteosarcoma and benign fibro-osseous lesions of the craniofacial bones were identified in the diagnostic pathology archives. MDM2 (SMP14 and/or IF2) and CDK4 (D9G3E and/or DCS-31) immunostains were performed on a representative block from each osteosarcoma and benign case. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for MDM2 was performed on non-decalcified osteosarcomas. In osteosarcomas, the rate of expression of either MDM2 IF2, MDM2 SMP14, CDK4 DCS-31, or CDK4 D9G3E was 72.7% (8/11 cases), usually focal and weak. Using the MDM2 IF2 clone and the CDK4 DCS-31 clone, MDM2 and CDK4 were negative in lesional cells in all 14 benign fibro-osseous lesions. Using the IF2 and SMP14 clones, MDM2 nuclear expression was present in associated osteoclast-like giant cells in both benign and malignant cases. Of 4 successful cases, 1 high grade osteosarcoma was positive for MDM2 amplification. MDM2 or CDK4 expression or MDM2 amplification may aid in a diagnosis of head and neck osteosarcoma. However, when absent, sarcoma is not excluded. Due to focal weak expression of MDM2 in tumor cells in conjunction with nuclear expression in associated giant cells, caution should be exercised when interpreting positive stains.

Mdm2 and p53 Expression in Radiation-Induced Sarcomas of the Head and Neck: Comparison with De Novo Sarcomas.

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of radiation-induced sarcomas (RISs) is not well known. In RIS, TP53 mutations are frequent, but little is known about Mdm2-p53 interaction, which is a recent therapeutic target of sarcomas. METHODS: We studied the immunohistochemical expression of Mdm2 and p53 of 8 RISs. The intervals between radiation therapy and diagnosis of secondary sarcomas ranged from 3 to 17 years. RESULTS: Mdm2 expression was more common in de novo sarcomas than RISs (75% vs 37.5%), and p53 expression was more common in RISs than in de novo cases (75% vs 37.5%). While half of the RISs were Mdm2(-)/p53(+), none of de novo cases showed such combination; while half of de novo sarcomas were Mdm2(+)/p53(-), which are a candidate group of Mdm2 inhibitors, only 1 RIS showed such a combination. Variable immunoprofiles observed in both groups did not correlate with tumor types, except that all of 2 myxofibrosarcomas were Mdm2(+)/p53(+). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we speculated that both radiation-induced and de novo sarcomagenesis are not due to a unique genetic mechanism. Mdm2-expression without p53 overexpression in 1 case of RIS decreases the future possibility of applying Mdm2 inhibitors on a subset of these difficult tumors.