Single institution experience with efgartigimod in patients with myasthenia gravis: Patient selection, dosing schedules, treatment response, and adverse events.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Efgartigimod is a neonatal Fc receptor blocker and was the first approved medication in its class for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). As a novel therapy, little is known about the use of efgartigimod in clinical practice. This study aims to describe how efgartigimod is being incorporated into the current therapeutic landscape of MG. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 17 patients with gMG treated with efgartigimod at the University of Pennsylvania between January 2022 and June 2023. RESULTS: Efgartigimod was selected mainly for patients who were treatment refractory, had side effects to other treatments, and/or required quick improvement in their symptoms. All patients had been previously treated with at least one medication for MG and had an average baseline Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score of 9.1. The patients treated with efgartigimod improved their MG-ADL score by an average of 5.5 points at 3 months (p < .001) and 7.1 points by 6 months (p < .001). Forty percent of patients achieved minimal symptom expression. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 43.7% of patients on efgartigimod, the most common being mild infection (urinary tract infection and thrush). There were no serious AEs. DISCUSSION: This study found efgartigimod to be efficacious, well tolerated, and safe in patients with MG. Efgartigimod should be considered as an add-on therapy, a bridge therapy, or as a monotherapy if patients have difficulty tolerating other treatments.

Short-term changes in serum miRNA levels and patient-reported clinical outcomes in myasthenia gravis.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) miR-150-5p, miR-30e-5p, and miR-21-5p have been suggested as potential biomarkers for myasthenia gravis (MG); however, the relationships between short-term natural changes of the miRNAs and patient-reported MG outcome scores have not been well-studied. We assessed the short-term fluctuations in miRNA levels and patient-reported outcome measures in MG. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 39 MG patients with regular follow-ups and unchanged medications at the Neurology outpatient clinic at Uppsala University Hospital. Patients had weekly follow-up visits for 1 month, at which blood samples were drawn, and scores from MG activities of daily living (MG-ADL), MG quality-of-life-15 (MG-QoL15), and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) were assessed. Serum levels of miRNA miR-150-5p, miR-30e-5p, and miR-21-5p were analyzed using quantitative real-time PCR. RESULTS: Intra-individual levels of miR-30e-5p and miR-150-5p were stable, whereas a significant reduction in miR-21-5p was observed from week 1 to week 2 (p = .0024) and from week 2 to week 3 (p < .0001). There were intra-individual differences over a short time in MG-ADL, with higher scores in female patients (p = .0281) and a significant reduction from the first to the second weeks (p = .0281), whereas MG-QoL15 and FSS scores were stable. DISCUSSION: The suggested MG biomarkers miR-30e-5p and miR-150-5p were more stable than miR-21-5p over a short time, indicating their short-term stability as biomarkers. Prospective multi-center studies with longer periods of follow-up and matched controls are needed to validate these miRNAs as biomarkers in MG.

Concordance between patient- and physician-reported Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scores.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a neuromuscular disease characterized by abnormal skeletal muscle fatiguability. The MG Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scale assesses eight symptoms and is often used as primary endpoint in MG clinical trials where it is completed by neurologists. However, in observational studies, patients frequently complete the MG-ADL scale independently of their neurologist. In this study we aimed to assess the concordance between self- and physician-reported MG-ADL scores. METHODS: An international observational study was conducted among adult patients with MG scheduled for a routine visit or who entered the hospital via emergency services. Consenting patients and physicians completed the MG-ADL. Concordance between assessments was calculated using Gwet's agreement coefficient (Gwet's AC) for the MG-ADL individual items and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the MG-ADL total score. RESULTS: Data were collected from 137 patients (63% female; mean age, 57.7 years). Physicians assessed the patient's symptoms as slightly more severe (8.1 vs 7.5 MG-ADL total score, respectively), corresponding to a difference of 0.6 on a range from 0 to 24. The ICC for the MG-ADL total score between the patient and the physician assessment was 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.89 to 0.95), showing excellent concordance. Gwet's AC showed substantial to almost perfect agreement for all items, except eyelid droop, for which the agreement was moderate. DISCUSSION: Our results demonstrate that patients and neurologists have a concordant assessment of the patient's MG symptoms when using the MG-ADL scale. This evidence supports patient self-administration of the MG-ADL in clinical practice and research.

Female sex and overweight are associated with a lower quality of life in patients with myasthenia gravis: a single center cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Myasthenia gravis (MG) affects individuals as a chronic autoimmune disease for many years. Commonly, chronic diseases significantly reduce the patients' quality of life. Aiming to improve the future quality of life in MG, this study assessed the factors impacting quality of life. As gender-specific medicine is becoming increasingly important, this study also focused on understanding gender differences in the outcome of MG. METHODS: The study is a combined monocentric, retrospective and prospective database analysis of patient records based on 2,370 presentations of 165 patients with clinically, serologically and/or electrophysiologically confirmed MG over an observation period of up to 47 years. The data collection included the following parameters: antibody status, disease severity, age, medication use, gender, and disease duration. In addition, a prospective survey was conducted on the quality of life using the Myasthenia gravis-specific 15-item Quality of Life scale (MG-QoL15) and on the activities of daily living using the MG-specific Activities of Daily Living scale (MG-ADL). RESULTS: Of the 165 patients, 85 were male (51.5%) and 80 were female (48.5%). The remaining baseline characteristics (e.g. age and antibody status) were consistent with other myasthenia gravis cohorts. A high body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.005) and a high disease severity (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with lower disease-specific quality of life. Additionally, the quality of life in women with MG was significantly reduced compared to male patients (19.7 vs. 13.0 points in the MG-QoL15, p = 0.024). Gender differences were also observable in terms of the period between initial manifestation and initial diagnosis and women were significantly more impaired in their activities of daily living (MG-ADL) than men (4.8 vs. 3.0 points, p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Women with MG had significantly poorer disease specific quality of life compared to men as well as patients with a higher BMI. In order to improve the quality of life, gender-specific medicine and further investigation regarding a modification of the quality of life by lowering the BMI are essential and necessary. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study approval by the Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Göttingen was granted (number 6/5/18).

Depression: A Contributing Factor to the Clinical Course in Myasthenia Gravis Patients.

Background and Objectives: The association between myasthenia gravis (MG) and depression is intricate and characterized by bidirectional causality. In this regard, MG can be a contributing factor to depression and, conversely, depression may worsen the symptoms of MG. This study aimed to identify any differences in the progression of the disease among patients with MG who were also diagnosed with depression as compared to those without depression. Our hypothesis focused on the theory that patients with more severe MG symptoms may have a higher likelihood of suffering depression at the same time. Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty-two male and female patients (N = 122) aged over 18 with a confirmed diagnosis of autoimmune MG who were admitted to the Neurology II department of Myasthenia Gravis, Clinical Institute Fundeni in Bucharest between January 2019 and December 2020, were included in the study. Patients were assessed at baseline and after six months. The psychiatric assessment of the patients included the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 items (HAM-D), and neurological status was determined with two outcome measures: Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) and Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Life (MG-ADL). The patients were divided into two distinct groups as follows: group MG w/dep, which comprised 49 MG patients diagnosed with depressive disorder who were also currently receiving antidepressant medication, and group MG w/o dep, which consisted of 73 patients who did not have depression. Results: In our study, 40.16% of the myasthenia gravis (MG) patients exhibited a comorbid diagnosis of depression. Among the MG patients receiving antidepressant treatment, baseline assessments revealed a mean MG-ADL score of 7.73 (SD = 5.05), an average QMG score of 18.40 (SD = 8.61), and a mean Ham-D score of 21.53 (SD = 7.49). After a six-month period, a statistically significant decrease was observed in the MG-ADL (2.92, SD = 1.82), QMG (7.15, SD = 4.46), and Ham-D scores (11.16, SD = 7.49) (p < 0.0001). These results suggest a significant correlation between MG severity and elevated HAM-D depression scores. Regarding the MG treatment in the group with depression, at baseline, the mean dose of oral corticosteroids was 45.10 mg (SD = 16.60). Regarding the treatment with pyridostigmine, patients with depression and undergoing antidepressant treatment remained with an increased need for pyridostigmine, 144.49 mg (SD = 51.84), compared to those in the group without depression, 107.67 mg (SD = 55.64, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our investigation confirms that the occurrence of depressive symptoms is significantly widespread among individuals diagnosed with MG. Disease severity, along with younger age and higher doses of cortisone, is a significant factor associated with depression in patients with MG. Substantial reductions in MG-ADL and QMG scores were observed within each group after six months, highlighting the effectiveness of MG management. The findings suggest that addressing depressive symptoms in MG patients, in addition to standard MG management, can lead to improved clinical outcomes.

Utilization of MG-ADL in myasthenia gravis clinical research and care.

The Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Living (MG-ADL) scale is an 8-item patient-reported scale that measures myasthenia gravis (MG) symptoms and functional status. The objective of the current review is to summarize the psychometric properties of the MG-ADL and published evidence of MG-ADL use. A targeted literature review for published studies of the MG-ADL was conducted using a database and gray literature search. A total of 48 publications and 35 clinical trials were included. Studies indicated that the MG-ADL is a reliable and valid measure that has been used as an outcome in clinical trials and observational studies to measure MG symptoms and response to treatment. While most often used as a secondary endpoint in clinical trials, its use as a primary endpoint has increased in recent years. The most common MG-ADL endpoint is change in MG-ADL score from baseline, although there has been an increase in the analysis of a responder threshold using the MG-ADL. A new concept of minimal symptom expression (MSE) has emerged more recently. Duration of treatment effect is another important construct that is being increasingly evaluated using the MG-ADL. The use of the MG-ADL as a primary endpoint in clinical trials and in responder threshold analyses to indicate treatment improvement has increased in recent years. MSE using the MG-ADL shows promise in helping to determine success of treatment and may be the aspirational goal of MG treatment for the future once validated, particularly given the evolving treatment landscape in MG.

Correlation of Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis and Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living scales in the MGTX study.

INTRODUCTION: Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) and Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scales were compared using the data from the Thymectomy Trial in Non-Thymomatous Myasthenia Gravis Patients Receiving Prednisone Therapy (MGTX) study. METHODS: Correlation between QMG and MG-ADL raw and change-from-baseline scores was calculated every 3 months for 60 months based on treatment groups and minimal manifestation status (MMS). RESULTS: QMG and MG-ADL change-from-baseline scores correlated significantly, with increasing strength of correlation over time, in both treatment groups. QMG and MG-ADL raw scores correlated significantly in both treatment groups, with increasing correlation only in the prednisone-alone group. Correlation between raw scores was weaker in patients who were in MMS, demonstrating a "floor effect" on the MG-ADL scale. Raw QMG scores could be modeled assuming a normal distribution, whereas raw MG-ADL scores could not be modeled this way. DISCUSSION: The floor effect and skewed distribution of the MG-ADL measure should be taken into account in the design of myasthenia gravis clinical trials.

Long-term safety and efficacy of eculizumab in generalized myasthenia gravis.

INTRODUCTION: Eculizumab is effective and well tolerated in patients with antiacetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG; REGAIN; NCT01997229). We report an interim analysis of an open-label extension of REGAIN, evaluating eculizumab's long-term safety and efficacy. METHODS: Eculizumab (1,200 mg every 2 weeks for 22.7 months [median]) was administered to 117 patients. RESULTS: The safety profile of eculizumab was consistent with REGAIN; no cases of meningococcal infection were reported during the interim analysis period. Myasthenia gravis exacerbation rate was reduced by 75% from the year before REGAIN (P < 0.0001). Improvements with eculizumab in activities of daily living, muscle strength, functional ability, and quality of life in REGAIN were maintained through 3 years; 56% of patients achieved minimal manifestations or pharmacological remission. Patients who had received placebo during REGAIN experienced rapid and sustained improvements during open-label eculizumab (P < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: These findings provide evidence for the long-term safety and sustained efficacy of eculizumab for refractory gMG. Muscle Nerve 2019.

Treatment outcome in juvenile-onset myasthenia gravis.

INTRODUCTION: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease of the neuromuscular junction. Approximately 10%-15% of MG patients have juvenile (<18 years of age) onset. We aimed to assess the clinical course, outcome, and subjectively perceived health status of a cohort of juvenile MG patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of medical records of 101 patients followed by a cross-sectional questionnaire study. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 12.8 years at onset and 13.7 years at diagnosis. Ninety percent of the patients were seropositive. Over 40% of the patients were treated with immunosuppression and over 80% underwent thymectomy. The mean Myathenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scale score was 2.48. At last follow-up, 30.9% of patients were in complete, stable remission; 77.8% perceived their health as good. DISCUSSION: The treatment outcome for juvenile MG is favorable, with a marked reduction of symptoms and good day-to-day activity achieved for most patients. Muscle Nerve 59:549-549, 2019.

Translation and validation of the arabic version of the myasthenia gravis activities of daily living scale.

INTRODUCTION: We translated the myasthenia gravis (MG)-specific activities of daily living (MG-ADL) scale into Arabic (MG-ADL-A) and assessed its psychometric properties. METHODS: We assessed reliability using Cronbach's α, reproducibility using the intraclass correlation coefficient, and validity using Spearman's correlations with MG composite (MGC) score, MG-specific manual muscle test (MG-MMT), and MG quality-of-life revised Arabic version (MGQOL15R-A). Differences in MG-ADL-A scores among patients with different disease severity were evaluated by using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Sensitivity to change was examined by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: We recruited 87 patients. The mean MG-ADL-A score was 3.38 ± 3.38 (α = 0.77, ICC = 0.99). The correlation coefficients between the MG-ADL-A and MGQOL15R-A, MGC, and MG-MMT were 0.63, 0.74, and 0.61, respectively (P < 0.001). The MG-ADL-A discriminated between different severity groups and was responsive to clinical improvement at follow-up. DISCUSSION: The MG-ADL-A has rigorous psychometric properties and can be used with Arabic-speaking patients with MG. Muscle Nerve 59:583-583, 2019.

Physician- and self-assessed myasthenia gravis activities of daily living score.

INTRODUCTION: The Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) profile scale is a simple-to-use instrument. We aimed to validate this scale in the Korean language and compare physician- and self-assessed MG-ADL scores (pMG-ADL-K and sMG-ADL-K). METHODS: pMG-ADL-K and sMG-ADL-K and MG Composite (MGC) scores were obtained from patients. The correlation between pMG-ADL-K and MGC and the relationship between the pMG-ADL-K and sMG-ADL-K were assessed using the Cronbach α and the Spearman coefficient. By intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the reliability of each sub-item of pMG-ADL-K and sMG-ADL-K was evaluated. RESULTS: We included data from 40 patients. The pMG-ADL-K score showed a strong correlation with the MGC score (rho = 0.80, P < 0.01). The Cronbach α was 0.98 between pMG-ADL-K and sMG-ADL-K, and sub-items showed good consistency (ICC 0.684-0.985, P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: The MG-ADL-K is a valid tool and the sMG-ADL-K shows excellent correlation with pMG-ADL-K. Both the pMG-ADL-K and sMG-ADL-K can be used to measure MG severity. Muscle Nerve 57: 419-422, 2018.

The Myasthenia Gravis-specific Activities of Daily Living scale as a useful outcome measure and in routine clinical management in Polish patients.

INTRODUCTION: The Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living scale (MG-ADL) is a short, and easy to use disease-specific quality of life during daily routine tool in myasthenia gravis. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of our work was to evaluate neurological condition patients with myasthenia gravis using the form MG-ADL in order to enable the introduction in common use of an instrument which allows for the assessment of patients with myasthenia gravis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The total number of 50 patients with MG were qualified for the examination. Each patient underwent neurological examination and completed the quality of life evaluation questionnaire MQ-ADL. Additionally, each patient was asked to evaluate the quality of his/her life by means of questionnaire MG-QOL 15 and MG Composite in Polish language version. RESULTS: Our analysis showed a positive correlation with other scales used - MG-QOL 15, MGFA, MG Composite. The intensification of neurological symptoms showed significant relation with obtained higher number of points in MG-ADL questionnaire. The MG-ADL was found to have high internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity. CONCLUSION: We confirmed reliability and dependability of the questionnaire in the the test-retest assessment. The MG-ADL is accepted to be a reliable and valuable tool for measuring disease-specific QOL in Polish patients with MG.

Validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change of the myasthenia gravis activities of daily living profile in a sample of Italian myasthenic patients.

The purpose of this study is to report on the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of the myasthenia gravis activities of daily living profile (MG-ADL) in a sample of Italian patients. Patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) completed a protocol that included the MG-ADL, the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0), the Besta Neurological Institute rating scale for myasthenia gravis, and the MG-composite. Cronbach's alpha was used to test reliability, Spearman's correlation and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) to test short-term test-retest, Kruskal-Wallis test to assess differences in MG-ADL between patients with different disease severity, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test to assess sensitivity to change. In total, 58 patients were enrolled: 44 were females, mean MG duration 10.5 ± 10.4 years, mean MG-ADL 3.98 ± 3.07. The MG-ADL showed good internal consistency (alpha = .774), stability (test-retest correlation = .98, ICC = .97). It was superior to the WHODAS 2.0 in differentiating patients with different MG type and severity (P < .001), it showed higher sensitivity to change (P = .001 for improved and P = .007 for worsened patients) and higher correlation with the MG-composite (RHO = .625). Our analysis shows that the Italian version of the MG-ADL is valid, reliable, stable, and sensitive to change.

A real-life experience with eculizumab and efgartigimod in generalized myasthenia gravis patients.

INTRODUCTION: Eculizumab, a complement active antibody, and efgartigimod, an Fc fragment that blocks neonatal Fc receptor, are both approved to treat generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) patients. The objective of this study is to describe the clinical response to both treatments in a real-life setting. METHODS: We collected baseline and follow-up clinical data using the Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG). We included 63 patients, 32 treated with eculizumab and 31 with efgartigimod. Of the efgartigimod-treated patients, 22 were anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab +) and 9 were AChR-Ab- (3 MuSK-Ab + and 6 seronegative). RESULTS: Both treatments showed similar efficacy relative to the MG-ADL scale reduction (p = 0.237). Efgartigimod had a similar effect on both AChR-Ab + and AChR-Ab- (p = 0.280). Eculizumab was superior to efgartigimod relative to the QMG score reduction for the entire dataset (p = 0.003) and was more likely to achieve a clinical response at the QMG compared to efgartigimod (OR 1.373; p = 0.016). Steroid-sparing effect was higher for eculizumab than efgartigimod ( - 16.7 vs - 5.2 mg of the baseline daily dose at follow-up; p = 0.001). Mean speed of prednisone reduction was - 13.1 mg of the daily dose for each month of follow-up for eculizumab-treated patients and - 3.2 for efgartigimod (p = 0.001). We found three serious events, all not related to treatment in the investigator's opinion. One eculizumab-treated patient experienced a severe pneumonia and died despite treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides evidence that eculizumab and efgartigimod can be used in clinical practice to reduce disability in gMG patients. Eculizumab-treated patients had a higher QMG response and steroid sparing effect. Efgartigimod may offer a more flexible schedule due to its cyclical use, no need for vaccination, and efficacy in AChR-Ab- patients.

Real-World experience with efgartigimod in patients with myasthenia gravis.

Recommendations for the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) have been difficult to develop because of limited evidence from large randomized controlled trials. New drugs and treatment approaches have recently been shown to be effective in phase 3 studies in seropositive generalized (g) MG. One such drug is efgartigimod, a human-Fc-fragment of IgG1, with a high affinity for the endosomal FcRn. We conducted a multicenter study to evaluate the real-world clinical and safety effects of efgartigimod in 22 gMG patients. We evaluated the strategies for the timing of re-treatment with it. The participants received a total of 59 efgartigimod -treatment cycles. The median number of cycles was 2 (range 1-6). Twenty patients (86.3%) improved by at least 2 MG-ADL points after the first treatment cycle. The median MG-ADL score at baseline was 6.5 (range: 3-17) and 2.5 (range: 0-9) post-treatment (p < 0.001). A consistent improvement of at least 2 points in the MG-ADL score after each cycle occurs in 18 patients. The effect duration of the treatment was usually between 4 and 12 weeks. Two major clinical patterns of treatment response were found. Treatment with efgartigimod was also associated with significant reductions of prednisone doses Overall, the treatment was safe and associated with only minor adverse events. The single fatality was apparently due tosevere respiratory failure. We found that efgartigimod is clinically effective, may be used as a steroid sparing agent and is generally safe for gMG patients. We recommend a personalized preventive treatment approach until clinical stabilization, followed by discontinuation and periodic evaluations.

Translation and validation of the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire: Latvian version.

Introduction: Our aim was to translate, adapt and validate the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living scale into the Latvian language and to evaluate this instrument (MG-ADL-L) in terms of construct validity and reliability. Methods: We enrolled patients with a confirmed MG diagnosis, who could speak Latvian fluently. We performed translation and adaptation according to the cross-cultural adaptation guidelines for self-reported measures. The patients were evaluated by a physician according to the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America classification (MGFA) and using the Myasthenia Gravis Composite Score (MGCS). Patients were asked to complete the MG-ADL-L and the 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MGQOL15) Internal consistency was evaluated based on Cronbach's α, reproducibility-Cohen's weighted kappa and construct validity-Spearman's correlation between the MG-ADL-L and the MGQOL15 and MGCS. We used the Kruskal-Wallis H test to compare the MG-ADL-L score distribution between the MGFA groups. Results: 38 enrolled patients in the study. There was an acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.76) and moderate to very good agreement between the test and retest scores (Cohen's weighted kappa = 0.54 and 0.81). The MG-ADL-L showed a moderate positive correlation with the MGQOL15 (r = 0.5, p = 0.001) and the MGCS (r = 0.62, p < 0.001). There was a significant difference in MG-ADL-L scores between the MGFA groups (p = 0.007). Discussion: The MG-ADL-L is a valid and reliable self-reported scale to assess and evaluate symptom severity and the impact of the disease on the lives of patients with MG.

Ravulizumab use for acetylcholine receptor-positive generalized myasthenia gravis in clinical practice.

Purpose: To describe the early experience of ravulizumab use in acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (AChR+ve gMG). Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included AChR+ve gMG patients who were treated with ravulizumab and had both pre- and post-ravulizumab myasthenia gravis activities of daily living (MG-ADL) scores. Clinical information regarding MG history, concomitant treatment(s), MG-ADL, other MG-specific measures, and adverse events were recorded. Results: A total of 18 patients with mean age of 61.83 (±16.08, n = 18) years were included in this cohort. In 10 complement inhibitor naive patients, a clinically meaningful reduction in mean Mg-ADL (baseline: 6.6 (±3.58) vs. 4.4 (±2.28), post ravulizumab) was seen. 6 out of 10 patients (60%) had clinically meaningful reduction post ravulizumab and two achieved minimum symptom expression (MSE). In 8 patients switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab, further reduction was noted in post ravulizumab mean MG-ADL (Baseline: 3.25 (±3.34) vs. 1.5 (±2.34) post ravulizumab). None of the patients who switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab experienced worsening symptoms. Eleven out of 14 (78.5%) patients on prednisone therapy were able to reduce their prednisone dose post-ravulizumab. None of the patients experienced any major side effects. Conclusion: In our clinical practice, 60% of AChR+ve gMG complement inhibitor naive patients experienced a clinically meaningful improvement in MG-ADL scores with ravulizumab. Patients were safely switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab and had further improvement in their mean MG-ADL scores. Of those on prednisone therapy, the majority were able to reduce their prednisone dosage.

Efgartigimod and Ravulizumab for Treating Acetylcholine Receptor Auto-antibody-Positive (AChR-Ab+) Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Indirect Treatment Comparison.

INTRODUCTION: Efgartigimod and ravulizumab, both approved for treating acetylcholine receptor auto-antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), have not been directly compared. This paper assessed comparative effects of efgartigimod vs. ravulizumab for treating adults with AChR-Ab+ gMG using indirect treatment comparison methods. METHODS: The matching-adjusted indirect comparison used data from two randomized trials of adult men and women. The ADAPT (efgartigimod vs. placebo; individual patient data available) population was reweighted to match the CHAMPION (ravulizumab vs. placebo; index study; aggregate data available) population. The relative effect of efgartigimod versus placebo was estimated in this reweighted population and compared with the observed ravulizumab versus placebo effect to estimate the efgartigimod versus ravulizumab effect. The outcomes were Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG), and Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15-item-revised scale (MG-QoL15r) assessed as cumulative effect (area under the curve; AUC) over 26 weeks (primary) and change from baseline at 4 weeks and time of best response (week 4 for efgartigimod; week 26 for ravulizumab). RESULTS: For MG-QoL15r, efgartigimod had a statistically significant improvement compared with ravulizumab over 26 weeks [mean difference (95% confidence interval): - 52.6 (- 103.0, - 2.3)], at week 4 [- 4.0 (- 6.6, - 1.4)], and at time of best response [- 3.9 (- 6.5, - 1.3)]. Efgartigimod had a statistically significant improvement over ravulizumab in MG-ADL at week 4 [- 1.9 (- 3.3, - 0.5)] and at time of best response [- 1.4 (- 2.8, 0.0)] and in QMG at week 4 [- 3.2 (- 5.2, - 1.2)] and at time of best response [- 3.0 (- 5.0, - 1.0)]. For AUC over 26 weeks, improvements were not significantly different between efgartigimod and ravulizumab for MG-ADL [- 8.7 (- 36.1, 18.8)] and QMG [- 13.7 (- 50.3, 22.9)]. CONCLUSION: Efgartigimod may provide a faster and greater improvement over 26 weeks in quality of life than ravulizumab in adults with AChR-Ab+ gMG. Efgartigimod showed faster improvements in MG-ADL and QMG than ravulizumab.

Association Between Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and EQ-5D-5L Utility Values: The Additional Effect of Efgartigimod on Utilities.

INTRODUCTION: For patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), the association between symptom severity, often measured with the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) instrument, and utility values is unknown. METHODS: Data was analyzed from the phase 3 ADAPT trial, which included adult patients with gMG randomly assigned to treatment with efgartigimod + conventional therapy (EFG + CT) or placebo + CT (PBO + CT). MG-ADL total symptom scores and the EQ-5D-5L, a measure of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), were collected biweekly up to 26 weeks. Utility values were derived from the EQ-5D-5L data with the United Kingdom value set. Descriptive statistics were reported for MG-ADL and EQ-5D-5L at baseline and follow-up. A normal identity-link regression model estimated the association between utility and the eight MG-ADL items. A generalized estimating equations (GEE) model was estimated to predict utility based on the patient's MG-ADL score and treatment received. RESULTS: A total of 167 patients (84 EFG + CT, 83 PBO + CT) contributed 167 baseline and 2867 follow-up measurements of MG-ADL and EQ-5D-5L. EFG + CT-treated patients experienced more improvements than PBO + CT-treated patients in most MG-ADL items and EQ-5D-5L dimensions, with the largest improvements observed in chewing, brushing teeth/combing hair, eyelid droop (MG-ADL); self-care, usual activities, mobility (EQ-5D-5L). The regression model indicated that individual MG-ADL items contributed differently to utility values, with the largest impact from brushing teeth/combing hair, rising from a chair, chewing, and breathing. The GEE model showed that each unit improvement in MG-ADL led to a statistically significant utility increase of 0.0233 (p < 0.001). In addition, a statistically significant improvement of 0.0598 (p = 0.0079) in utility was found for patients in the EFG + CT group compared to the PBO + CT group. CONCLUSION: Among patients with gMG, improvements in MG-ADL were significantly associated with higher utility values. MG-ADL scores alone were not sufficient to capture the utility gained from efgartigimod therapy.

People Diagnosed with Myasthenia Gravis have Lower health-related quality of life and Need More Medical and Caregiver Help in Comparison to the General Population: Analysis of Two Observational Studies.

INTRODUCTION: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a neuromuscular disease causing extreme muscular fatigue, triggering problems with vision, swallowing, speech, mobility, dexterity, and breathing. This analysis intended to estimate the health-related quality-of-life impact, the medical burden, and the need for caregiver help of people diagnosed with MG. METHODS: MyRealWorld-MG (MRW) is an observational study among adults diagnosed with MG in 9 countries. The General Population Norms (POPUP) observational study enrolled representative members of the general population in 8 countries. In both digital studies, respondents entered personal characteristics and provided data on medical conditions, EQ-5D-5L, HUI3, MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), sick leave, caregiver help, and medical care utilization. RESULTS: In MRW (n = 1859), 58.4% of respondents had moderate-to-severe MG. Average utility values were lower in MRW versus POPUP (0.739 vs. 0.843 for EQ-5D-5L; 0.493 vs. 0.746 for HUI3), and declined with more severe disease (0.872, 0.707, 0.511 EQ-5D-5L utilities and 0.695, 0.443, 0.168 HUI3 utilities for mild, moderate, and severe MG, respectively). Taking sick leave in the past month was 2.6 times more frequent among people diagnosed with MG compared to the general population (34.4% vs. 13.2%) and four times more people diagnosed with MG reported needing help from a caregiver (34.8% vs. 8.3%). Use of medical care was twice as likely in MRW in comparison with POPUP (51.9% vs. 24.6%). CONCLUSION: This direct comparison of people diagnosed with MG and the general population using two large international studies revealed significant negative impact of MG. Results were consistent across all outcomes, in all countries.