The Role of Cardioprotection in Cancer Therapy Cardiotoxicity: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review.

Cardiotoxicity is a relatively frequent and potentially serious side effect of traditional and targeted cancer therapies. Both general measures and specific pharmacologic cardioprotective interventions as well as imaging- and biomarker-based surveillance strategies to identify patients at high risk have been tested in randomized controlled trials to prevent or attenuate cancer therapy-related cardiotoxic effects. Although meta-analyses including early trials suggest an overall beneficial effect, there is substantial heterogeneity in results. Recent randomized controlled trials of neurohormonal inhibitors in patients receiving anthracyclines and/or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-targeted therapies have shown a lower rate of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction than previously reported and a modest or no sustained effect of the interventions. Data on preventive cardioprotective strategies for novel cancer drugs are lacking. Larger, prospective multicenter randomized clinical trials testing traditional and novel interventions are required to more accurately define the benefit of different cardioprotective strategies and to refine risk prediction and identify patients who are likely to benefit.

Evolution of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in the Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease Associated with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the most frequent complications associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and is also an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) is a nuclear receptor expressed in many tissue types, including kidney and heart. Aberrant and long-term activation of MR by aldosterone in patients with T2DM triggers detrimental effects (eg, inflammation and fibrosis) in these tissues. The suppression of aldosterone at the early stage of T2DM has been a therapeutic strategy for patients with T2DM-associated CKD. Although patients have been treated with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers for decades, RAS blockers alone are not sufficient to prevent CKD progression. Steroidal MR antagonists (MRAs) have been used in combination with RAS blockers; however, undesired adverse effects have restricted their usage, prompting the development of nonsteroidal MRAs with better target specificity and safety profiles. Recently conducted studies, Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease (FIDELIO-DKD) and Finerenone in Reducing Cardiovascular Mortality and Morbidity in Diabetic Kidney Disease (FIGARO-DKD), have reported that finerenone, a nonsteroidal MRA, improves both renal and cardiovascular outcomes compared with placebo. In this article, we review the history of MRA development and discuss the possibility of its combination with other treatment options, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and potassium binders for patients with T2DM-associated CKD.

Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes Associated With Hyperkalemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Hospital-Based Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between hyperkalemia and long-term cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational retrospective cohort study was performed using a Japanese hospital claims registry, Medical Data Vision (April 1, 2008, to September 30, 2018). Of 1,208,894 patients with at least 1 potassium measurement, 167,465 patients with chronic kidney disease were selected based on International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Hyperkalemia was defined as at least 2 potassium measurements of 5.1 mmol/L or greater within 12 months. Normokalemic controls were patients without a record of potassium levels of 5.1 mmol/L or greater and 3.5 mmol/L or less. Changes in eGFRs and hazard ratios of death, hospitalization for cardiac events, heart failure, and renal replacement therapy introduction were assessed between propensity score-matched hyperkalemic patients and normokalemic controls. RESULTS: Of 16,133 hyperkalemic patients and 11,898 normokalemic controls eligible for analyses, 5859 (36.3%) patients and 5859 (49.2%) controls were selected after propensity score matching. The mean follow-up period was 3.5 years. The 3-year eGFR change in patients and controls was -5.75 and -1.79 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Overall, hyperkalemic patients had higher risks for death, hospitalization for cardiac events, heart failure, and renal replacement therapy introduction than controls, with hazard ratios of 4.40 (95% CI, 3.74 to 5.18), 1.95 (95% CI, 1.59 to 2.39), 5.09 (95% CI, 4.17 to 6.21), and 7.54 (95% CI, 5.73 to 9.91), respectively. CONCLUSION: Hyperkalemia was associated with significant risks for mortality and adverse clinical outcomes, with more rapid decline of renal function. These findings underscore the significance of hyperkalemia as a predisposition to future adverse events in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Outcomes of patients with anemia and renal dysfunction in hospitalized heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (from the CN-HF registry).

BACKGROUND: Although a large number of studies on heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have found that anemia and renal dysfunction (RD) independently predicted poor outcomes, there are still few reports on patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS: Clinical data of HFpEF patients registered in the China National Heart Failure Registration Study (CN-HF) were evaluated and the clinical features of patients with or without anemia/RD were compared to explore the impact of anemia and RD on all-cause mortality and all-cause re-hospitalization. RESULTS: 1604 patients with HFpEF were enrolled, the prevalence of anemia was 51.0%. Although anemia was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality and all-cause re-hospitalization in univariate COX regression (p < 0.05), multivariate COX model confirmed that anemia was not independently associated with all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-1.52, p = 0.386] and all-cause re-hospitalization (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.96-1.33, p = 0.152). Similarly, RD was not an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.88-1.57, p = 0.269) and all-cause re-hospitalization (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.79-1.12, p = 0.488) as assessed in the adjusted COX regression model. The interaction between RD and anemia on end-points events was also not statistically significant. However, anemia was associated with increased all-cause re-hospitalization in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HFpEF from CN-HF registry, anemia was common, but was not an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and all-cause re-hospitalization, except for the all-cause re-hospitalization in patients with NYHA class III-IV.Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/home; ID: NCT02079428.

Importance of the time of initiation of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on risk of mortality in patients with heart failure.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have definitively shown the benefit of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in patients with heart failure (HF). However, very few prior studies examined the relationship between the timing of initiation of MRAs and prognosis. In addition, on this topic, there is no information regarding the specific population of patients suffering a first episode of decompensated congestive HF. METHODS: We studied a homogenous cohort of patients discharged alive from our hospital after a first episode of decompensated congestive HF, in order to clarify the association between time of aldosterone receptor antagonist (ARA) initiation (within the first 90 days after hospital discharge) and mortality. Our population was composed of a series of consecutive patients. All-cause mortality was compared between patients who initiated MRAs at discharge (early group) and those who initiated MRAs one month later and up to 90 days after discharge (delayed group). We used prescription time distribution matching to control for survival difference between groups. RESULTS: The early and delayed groups consisted of 365 and 320 patients, respectively. During the one-year follow-up, a significant difference in mortality was demonstrated between groups. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for early versus delayed initiation were 1.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96 to 2.84) at six months, and 1.93 (95% CI 1.18 to 3.14) at one year. CONCLUSIONS: Delay of MRA initiation up to 30 to 90 days after discharge implies a significant increase in mortality compared with MRA initiation at discharge, after a first episode of decompensate congestive HF.