In reply to the letter to the editor regarding "Clinical outcomes of teeth adjacent to the site of mandibulotomy or mandibulectomy in patients with head and neck cancer: results from a multidisciplinary mono-institutional head and neck tumor board".

This paper aims to reply to Somay et al., regarding their comment to a previous paper from our group, titled "Clinical outcomes of teeth adjacent to the site of mandibulotomy or mandibulectomy in patients with head and neck cancer: results from a multidisciplinary mono-institutional head and neck tumor board".The following concerns were addressed: 1) Within the limits of a case series, mandibulectomy might be considered a risk factor for the loss of tooth vitality as well as mandibulotomy. 2) Root canal therapy before surgery on the teeth adjacent to the surgical site could be an appropriate strategy, although in some cased it may involve teeth which are not destinate to have endodontic complications. 3) Dose-volume data of the included teeth were provided: the impact of radiotherapy (RT) as a confounding factor seems not to be as relevant as Somay et al. have pointed out.

Modified submandibular mandibulotomy approach versus lip-splitting approach in tongue cancer surgery: a retrospective paired-cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The surgical approach for resection and reconstruction of tongue cancer (TSCC) with or without the lip-splitting incision is controversial. This study introduced a modified approach without lip-splitting and the clinical results were assessed. METHODS: Sixty-eight TSCC patients underwent surgery using the modified submandibular mandibulotomy (MSMM) approach without lip-splitting, and another matched 68 patients using lip-splitting mandibulotomy (LSM) approach were enrolled in this study. The clinical results including intraoperative relevance and surgical morbidities, survival status, facial appearance and scar scores, function of lower lip, and quality of life (QOL) were evaluated. RESULTS: The primary tumors were en bloc resected through the MSMM approach with excellent tumor exposure and R0 resection margins as LSM approach. The survival status and complications were similar in both groups. The function of lower lip was better in patients of MSMM group at 1 month after surgery. The MSMM approach was associated with significantly better facial appearance and recreation compared to LSM approach by scar scores and QOL assessment. CONCLUSION: The MSMM approach without lip-splitting achieves similar tumor control, better aesthetic results, and QOL compared to LSM approach. It is a safe and effective surgical approach for patients with TSCC. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The MSMM approach without lip-splitting is oncological safety in tongue cancer surgery and is scrutinized as one part of the treatment concept for better aesthetic results.

Clinical outcomes of teeth adjacent to the site of mandibulotomy or mandibulectomy in patients with head and neck cancer: results from a multidisciplinary mono-institutional head and neck tumor board.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this case series was to evaluate the necrosis of teeth adjacent to the site of mandibulotomy or mandibulectomy in a cohort of patients suffering from head and neck cancers. METHODS: Fourteen patients who underwent segmental mandibulectomy or paramedian mandibulotomy for oral, oropharynx or major salivary gland cancer and a total of 23 teeth were included in this case series. Twelve patients underwent adjuvant head and neck radiotherapy. Cold sensitivity pulp testing and/or electric pulp testing were performed on teeth at the margin of mandibulectomy and on teeth adjacent to mandibulotomy after surgery. A "positive" response was considered the healthy state, and "negative" was considered the diseased state of the tooth. RESULTS: The 10 patients who underwent mandibulotomy had 12 teeth with a negative response. The 4 patients treated by mandibulectomy had two positive and three negative responses to cold and electric pulp tests. Fifteen out of 23 teeth (65.2%) showed a negative response to sensitivity testing. CONCLUSIONS: Tooth necrosis seems to be a common event after mandibulectomy and mandibulotomy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To avoid post-surgery complications, performing root canal therapy before surgery on the teeth adjacent to the surgical site could be an appropriate strategy.

[Critical aspects of the transmandibular approach to the oral cavity and oropharynx]. / Kritische Aspekte des transmandibulären Zugangswegs zu Mundhöhle und Oropharynx.

BACKGROUND: In the context of tumor surgery, the median mandibulotomy as an access route to the oral cavity and oropharynx provides an excellent overview of the surgical site. However, it is not regarded entirely unproblematic with regard to early and later complications that may arise. OBJECTIVE: The results and complications of the median mandibulotomy will be presented based on data collected from our own patient collective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 21 patients who had undergone a median mandibulotomy as part of tumor surgery at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of the SRH Zentralklinikum Suhl were examined over a period from 01 January 2010 to 31 December 2020. The patient files were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: A stair-step median mandibulotomy was performed in all 21 patients. Reconstruction was performed using a 2.8 mm thick angled mandibular plate and bicortical locking screws. The mean follow-up period was 29.8 months. In all, 7 patients (33%) had a recurrence at the time of surgery; 5 patients (24%) had already undergone pre-radiation. Furthermore, 18 patients (85.7%) received adjuvant radiotherapy. We found plate loosening or extrusion in 0 of 21 cases. A salivary fistula (4.7%) was observed in 1 patient. Trismus was found in 4 (19%) cases during follow-up. Osteoradionecrosis was found in 2 (9.5%) of 21 cases. Cosmetic deficits were not observed. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the stair-step median mandibulotomy in combination with a 2.8 mm thick reconstruction plate and bicortical locking screws leads to a stable and safe reconstruction even with pre-irradiated situations. Plate loosening or extrusion did not occur.

Identification of predisposing factors for osteonecrosis of the jaw after marginal mandibulectomy in the surgical management of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) with the extent of marginal mandibulectomy. METHODS: Between January 2006 and December 2012, 3087 patients undergoing ablative resection were consecutively enrolled. Among them, 345 cases undergoing marginal mandibulectomy were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The occurrence of ONJ was 5.51% and associated with body mass index, overall stage, diabetes, concomitant mandibulotomy, and radiotherapy (P = 0.023, 0.033, 0.009, 0.016, and 0.006, respectively). As for bone parameters based on radiological measurements after marginal mandibulectomy, resected bone height, remaining bone height to original bone height ratio, and resected bone height to original bone height ratio were associated with ONJ. In multivariate logistic analyses, concomitant mandibulotomy, radiotherapy, diabetes, resected bone height of >14.5 mm, resected bone height to original bone height ratio of >49.5%, and remaining bone height to original bone height ratio of <53.5% indicated higher risks for ONJ (adjusted HR: 4.345, 4.152, 4.079, 3.402, 3.541, and 3.211; P = 0.018, 0.013, 0.009, 0.021, 0.018, and 0.043, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the predisposing factors and parameters associated with ONJ with marginal mandibulectomy; more caution is necessitated in performing marginal mandibulectomy in patients with multiple risks to prevent ONJ.

Stair-stepped mandibulotomy: Clinical indication, surgery program design, and operation points.

For radical treatment of malignancies in the posterior region of the oral cavity and oropharynx, surgical exposure of the tumor by mandibulotomy is often required. Midline or paramedian vertical mandibulotomies are commonly performed in clinical practice, but these can damage the suprahyoid musculature and genioglossus, and weaken the swallowing and speech function of patients. Stair-stepped mandibulotomy is a new procedure, developed on the principles of functional surgery, that preserves the structure and function of the mandible whilst providing a clear field and avoiding damage to critical muscle attachments. Stair-stepped mandibulotomy is suitable for patients whose primary tumor is located in the middle and posterior part of the tongue or oropharynx, especially if the lesion involves extrinsic tongue muscles. In this case report, we draw on 2 cases of typical patients in our center to elaborate the surgery program design, operation points, advantages and disadvantages of stair-stepped mandibulotomy.

Midline mandibulotomy for large carotid body tumors: a valuable approach.

In the present case, a 41-year-old male patient had reported a large swelling on the right side of his neck that had been radiographically diagnosed as a carotid body tumor. The tumor extended toward the right thyroid lobe, deep to the parapharyngeal space and cranially to the base of the skull. The clinical and medical imaging findings confirmed the diagnosis. Because of the large size of the tumor (50 mm × 48 mm × 85 mm), extent of involvement, and hypervascularity, surgical excision by midline mandibulotomy was chosen as the treatment approach. Midline mandibulotomy is a very good approach for large tumors with extensive involvement of the surrounding tissues, especially tumors with great medial and cephalic extension.

Osteoradionecrosis After Mandibulotomy and Marginal Mandibulectomy in Patients With Oral Cancer.

Objectives Osteoradionecrosis is one of the most severe complications in patients with head and neck cancer, which is characterized by persistent exposed and devitalized bone without proper healing after radiation. The extent to which mandibulotomy and marginal mandibulectomy influence the occurrence of osteoradionecrosis remains unclear. This study evaluated the incidence and risk factors for developing osteoradionecrosis of the mandible after oral cancer treatments. Methods A retrospective study was performed to analyze medical records of patients who underwent surgery and postoperative radiotherapy for oral cancers from 2009 to 2019 at a tertiary care hospital. Patient characteristics, incidence, and risk factors for developing osteoradionecrosis were reviewed. Comparisons between continuous and categorical data were performed using t-test and Chi-squared test. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the association between factors and the development of osteoradionecrosis. Results Among the 61 patients included in the study, osteoradionecrosis of the mandible occurred in 9 of 32 (28.1%) patients who underwent mandibular surgery during oral cancer resection (marginal mandibulectomy and/or mandibulotomy) and 2 of 29 (6.9%) patients without mandibular surgery. The development of osteoradionecrosis was significantly associated with performing mandibular surgery (hazard ratio 4.64, 95% confidence interval: 1.002, 21.5) and HIV infection (hazard ratio 8.53, 95% confidence interval: 2.2, 33.3). In the subgroup analysis of mandibular surgery, the development of osteoradionecrosis significantly increased in patients undergoing mandibulotomy (hazard ratio 6.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.3, 34.8) but not in patients undergoing marginal mandibulectomy (hazard ratio 3.56, 95% confidence interval: 0.6, 22.0). The analysis also showed that concurrent chemoradiation, radiation doses ≥ 60 Gy, and smoking were potential risk factors for the development of osteoradionecrosis, but none of these factors were statistically significant. Conclusion Our findings suggest that mandibular surgery is a significant risk factor for the development of osteoradionecrosis in patients with oral cancer. Further studies including larger population sizes are required to verify these findings.

Midline versus paramedian mandibulotomy for tongue cancer surgery: analysis of complications.

Midline and paramedian mandibulotomies both have distinct anatomical and surgical strengths. A retrospective study was performed at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch between 2014 and 2019 to investigate how the osteotomy site (midline (n = 221) or paramedian (n = 44)) and type (straight, notched, or stair-stepped) affect postoperative and post-radiotherapy complications in patients undergoing wide excision of tongue cancer with flap reconstruction. Midline mandibulotomies were predominantly of the straight osteotomy type, while paramedian mandibulotomies were mostly notched type (P < 0.001). Comparably low elective tooth extraction rates were found in both approaches (P = 0.556). Paramedian mandibulotomy showed a higher osteoradionecrosis rate (P = 0.026), but there was no significance in the sub-analysis of individual types. Paramedian sites were associated with more early infection (P = 0.036) and plate exposure (P = 0.036) than midline sites with the straight osteotomy type, but complication rates did not differ significantly for the notched and stair-stepped types. Paramedian sites (P = 0.020) and notched types (P = 0.006) were associated with higher odds of osteoradionecrosis in the univariable logistic regression analysis, but only the notched type remained significant in the multivariable analysis (P = 0.048). In conclusion, paramedian sites increased the rate of osteoradionecrosis, and correlation with the osteotomy type resulted in more osteoradionecrosis in notched types and more complications in straight paramedian mandibulotomies.

Isolated Infratemporal Fossa Desmoid Fibromatosis: A Rare Case Report and Review of Literature.

Desmoid fibromatosis (DF) arising from musculoaponeurotic structures rarely affects the head and neck region with the abdomen being the most common site of origin. These are benign tumors with locally infiltrative nature usually presenting as painless swellings that are rapidly growing. The infratemporal fossa DF is an extremely rare location with few clinical reports. This article discusses the management of a 2-year-old child with DF of the infratemporal fossa (ITF) along with literature review.

Different Approaches to the Overlapping Infratemporal Fossa and Parapharyngeal Spaces: a Case Series and Review of Literature.

Parapharyngeal space and infratemporal fossa are 2 overlapping spaces in head and neck which have complex anatomy with vital neurovascular structures passing through them. Tumors of this region are extremely rare but majority of them (80%) are benign. Benign tumors of this region can lead to swellings in facial region, neck and oropharynx. Dysphagia may be a complaint of the patient. Many of these tumors have malignant potential. Removal of these tumors requires a good understanding of the anatomy of this space so that correct surgical approach can be selected. The surgeon needs to be adept in using the most suitable surgical approach for excision of these tumors. There are various approaches which can be used to access these deeply seated tumors but the issue of prime importance is selecting the appropriate approach for the various tumors here based on their size and their exact location in this complex anatomical space. Inappropriate approach can lead to inadequate tumor excision and can lead to injuries to the neurovascular structures in this region which can cause significant disability. The case series reported here describes the various approaches to this region and highlights the importance of correct selection of the surgical approach.

Modified submandibular mandibulotomy approach without lip-splitting in tongue cancer.

Lip-splitting approach for oncologic resection and defect reconstruction of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) needs modification to avoid unfavorable esthetic results. Forty-three patients with TSCC underwent surgery using the modified submandibular mandibulotomy(MSMM) approach without lip-splitting and another matched 43 patients using lip-splitting mandibulotomy (LSM) approach were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical outcomes evaluation consisted of tumor exposure, resection margin, surgical morbidity, locoregional recurrence, survival status, scar scores and quality of life (QOL). All the tumors were en bolc removed by MSMM approach and LSM approach through combined intraoral routes with excellent tumor exposure and R0 resection margins. Tumor recurrence rates and swallowing, chewing, speech were similar in both groups. The MSMM approach was associated with significantly better facial appearance and recreation than LSM approach. The MSMM approach without lip-splitting is safe and effective, achieves better QOL compared to LSM approach in patients with TSCC.

Morbidity related to the lip-split mandibulotomy approach: a systematic and narrative review.

The lip-split mandibulotomy (LSMA) is an access procedure that has been used in head and neck (H&N) surgery as an aid to surgical resection of inaccessible tumours of the postertior oral cavity and oropharynx. Anecdotal evidence suggests that it has significant morbidity. Voices of concern within the H&N surgical community suggest that it has been abandoned in favour of technological advances such as robotic surgery. We report here the first (to our knowledge) registered systematic review of its kind, documenting the safety and efficiency of LSMA in H&N surgery. We performed a PRISMA-guided systematic review (PROSPERO-registered) and identified reports using a search algorithm in MEDLINE/EMBASE. LSMA-related surgical complications were recorded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Secondary outcomes included swallowing dysfunction, facial cosmesis, and patient satisfaction recorded in health-related quality of life questionnaires (HRQoL). From 125 studies identified, 54 met the inclusion criteria (3872 patients). The LSMA mortality rate was 0%; we did not identify a single case of perioperative death. The median rate of osteoradionecrosis was 5.4%, whereas fistula formation was 5.7%. Malunion was noted in 4.9%. Other complications (surgical site infection, plate exposure) were around 5%. There was significant between-study variation with regards to swallowing assessment tools, but overall there was no significant difference in outcomes. This was also the case for the HRQoL questionairres. LSMA is a safe procedure with an acceptable rate of complications, and should definitely remain in the armamentarium of H&N surgery.

The Mandible Sparing "POSC Technique" for Management of Middle and Posterior Third Tongue Cancers.

Cancer of the tongue forms more than 50% of oral cavity cancers. Generally, patients come with locally advanced tongue cancer. The treatment for this cancer is multi-modality. For resectable cancer, multiple surgical approaches are described in the literature. Mandibulotomy for resection of the middle and posterior third oral cancer is a well-established technique but it has its attended morbidity. We present our results of a new surgical technique, called the Peroral and submandibular cervical surgical approach wherein tongue cancer of middle third and posterior third is resected without mandibulotomy. The advantages of this technique are that the complications of malunion or non-union of bone are avoided, no chances of osteoradionecrosis or osteomyelitis, no need of periosteal elevation or damage, the malignancy is removed with wide margin with minimal blood loss, there is no scar on face or chin, morbidity of surgery is minimal. Also, the technique is easily reproducible.

The impact of lip-split mandibulotomy on patients treated for pT2 oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a study of 224 patients.

BACKGROUND: Head and neck surgeons often face a challenge in order to achieve adequate three-dimensional resection of tumours in the oral cavity, especially in the dentate patient. METHODS: We compared the outcomes of lip-split mandibulotomy and trans-oral access, respectively, in patients treated for primary pT2 oral tongue SCC with regard to the status of the resection margins and the incidence of tumour recurrence. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed a non-significant effect of the surgical technique used to the reported recurrence, F(1, 224) = 0.350, p = .555 and a significant effect on the margins achieved F(1, 224) = 11.381, p = .001. CONCLUSIONS: Defects after excision of larger and more posterior tumours that are going to be reconstructed with free flaps represent a more probable indication for using an osteotomy access technique. Lip-split mandibulotomy is a low-morbidity technique which can deliver a sound oncological outcome and can be relatively easily taught to less experienced surgeons.

Cancellous Tibial Bone Graft for Malunion after Mandibular Reconstruction in Head and Neck Cancer.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: While nonunion after mandibular reconstruction for head and neck surgery is rare, literature exploring management is scarce. Our primary objective was to determine success rates of tibial bone graft (TBG) in achieving mandibular union. Secondary objectives include determining factors that contribute to failure of TBG. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Chart Review. METHODS: Retrospective chart review between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2018. Patients who underwent a mandibulotomy or mandibulectomy with osteocutaneous free flap reconstruction were identified. Patients who were pursuing dental rehabilitation, subsequently diagnosed with mandibular nonunion and received a cancellous TBG were assessed. RESULTS: The 15 patients meeting inclusion criteria were mostly male (67%), white (87%), and nonsmokers (67%) with a median age of 64 (IQR = 60-73). Successful union occurred in 13 of 18 (72%) TBGs and the majority (63%) had a partial union documented at the time of surgery. Five patients (83%) who initially had a mandibulotomy achieved union compared to 78% of those with osteocutaneous reconstruction (P = 1.0). Postoperative radiation did not affect rates of union: 80% for both (P = 1.0). Patients with osteoradionecrosis (ORN) achieved union in 67% of cases compared to 75% of cases who did not have ORN (P = .86). There were similar rates of union for those who required perioperative antibiotics for infection and those without infection (67% vs. 75%, P = .86). Dental rehabilitation was achieved in 55% of patients, most commonly dentures. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that TBG can be used to achieve union for patients with malunion after head and neck cancer reconstruction. We show its successful use within the reconstructive algorithm for patients regardless of postoperative radiation for very small defects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:1291-1296, 2021.

[Influence of mandibulotomy approaches on oral function following radical resection of tongue carcinoma].

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the influences of postoperative oral function in patients with median or paramedian mandibulotomy during the radical resection of tongue carcinoma and to provide evidence for the choice of osteotomy location for mandibulotomy. METHODS: The clinical data of 126 patients who underwent combined radical neck dissection with mandibulectomy and glossectomy followed by simultaneous reconstruction were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to the position of mandibulotomy: median mandibulotomy group (median group, n=60) and paramedian mandibulotomy group (paramedian group, n=66). The fourth edition of the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL) was used to compare the differences in oral functions, such as swallowing, mastication, and speech, between the two groups during regular follow-up. SPSS 24.0 software package was used for statistical analysis, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Six months after the operation, no significant differences in swallowing, mastication, and speech functions were found between the median and paramedian groups. However, the swallowing and speech functions in the paramedian group were better than those in the median group 1 year after the operation (P<0.05), whereas no statistical difference in mastication function was observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the postoperative oral function results showed that paramedian mandibulotomy was a better surgical approach than median mandibulotomy. Paramedian mandibulotomy is worth prioritizing in the radical resection of tongue carcinoma.

Complication analysis of three different designs of temporary mandibulotomy in tongue cancer treatment.

BACKGROUND: Mandibulotomy helps access posterior oral cavity tumors. If osteotomy designs affect postoperative and postradiotherapy complications, needs to be tested clinically. METHODS: Two hundred and eighteen patients who underwent midline mandibulotomy for primary tongue cancer wide excision and flap reconstruction at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital during 2014-2019. RESULTS: There were 114 straight, 54 notched, and 50 stair-stepped osteotomy cases. Stair-stepped osteotomy had less advanced tumor stages (P = .009) and notched osteotomy more common single-plate fixations (P = .012). The former showed higher mandibular heights (P = .000) and more intact midline teeth (P = .011) than notched and straight ones. Straight osteotomy cases showed lower early infection rates (P = .039). Single-plate fixation was related to more flap dehiscence (P = .001) and oro-cutaneous fistulas (P = .035). CONCLUSIONS: Complex osteotomy does not offer long-term benefits in midline mandibulotomies for primary tongue cancers and has higher early infections. Single-plate fixation increases postoperative complications.

Transmandibular Approach in Head and Neck Oncological Surgery.

Objective: To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the transmandibular approach to the posterior area of the maxilla, oropharyngeal region and the hypopharynx in head and neck surgery. Methods: A series of 42 patients who underwent a lip-split mandibulotomy procedure to access malignant tumours affecting deep areas of the head and neck region between 2008 and 2018 in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the Ramón y Cajal University Hospital (Madrid, Spain) were retrospectively reviewed. The diagnosis and operations data of the patients were collected and analysed. Results: Using the transmandibular approach, 42 patients were operated on to access malignant tumours located in the oropharynx (n = 23, 54.76%) including the posterior third of the tongue, tonsil and soft palate, retromolar trygone (n = 9, 21.43%), floor of the mouth (n = 3, 7.14%), skull base (n = 2, 4.76%), superior maxilla (n = 3, 7.14%) and deep lobe of the parotid gland (n = 2, 4.76%). Primary reconstruction was carried out in all cases. The most used flap reconstruction method was the forearm fasciocutaneous flap in 48.71% of cases, followed by the anterolateral thigh flap in 20.51% of cases. The remaining cases were treated with other methods. The most frequent complication was surgical wound infection. Conclusion: The transmandibular approach is a good alternative to provide access for the removal of complex tumours affecting the oropharyngeal region. This approach facilitates direct visualisation of the lesion and bleeding control, allowing tumour resection with wide margins and making primary reconstruction easier. Although further progress in the transoral robotic approach could be a good option in selected cases, given the current state of knowledge, the transmandibular approach is a good option to access tumours affecting deep areas of the oral cavity and oropharynx.

Transoral Resection of Giant Parapharyngeal Space Tumors via a Combined Surgical Approach.

INTRODUCTION: Parapharyngeal space (PPS) tumors account for 0.5% of the head and neck neoplasms. Based on the evidence, 80% of these tumors are of a benign nature. Surgical excision is the treatment of choice for this condition. The present study was conducted to propose transoral resection as an efficient way to excise the benign well-defined tumors of the PPS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective case series study was conducted on seven patients undergoing the transoral excision of the sizeable masses of the PPS via a combined approach. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance scans revealed giant masses in the PPS in all cases. These neoplasms were preoperatively diagnosed as well-delineated, non-vascular, and benign. RESULTS: All patients underwent transoral tumor excision preceded by an auxiliary transcervical approach, which served as an assurance for the dissection and preservation of the cranial nerves and neurovascular bundle without any tumor spillage. Average hospital stay was limited to a maximum of 3 days, and all patients had an uneventful postoperative course. The follow-up examination did not indicate any recurrence. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings, transoral resection can be concluded as an efficient way to excise benign, well-defined tumors of the PPS. This procedure appears to be safe when a secondary transcervical approach is applied. Given the unnecessity of performing mandibulotomy in this procedure, it is expected to have lower morbidity and fewer complications.