Preservation of prearthritic coronal knee phenotype and prearthritic coronal alignment yielded improved Kujala scores following ligament-guided medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: There is a lack of literature evaluating outcomes of the ligament-guided approach in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). An improved comprehension of the distribution of coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) phenotypes and sagittal tibial wear patterns and their associations with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and implant survivorship could provide insights into its further application in daily practice. METHODS: A registry was reviewed for patients with a minimal 2-year follow-up who underwent robotic-assisted, ligament-guided, medial UKA between 2008 and 2016. Survivorship and postoperative PROMs were collected. CPAK phenotypes and sagittal tibial wear patterns were determined. Survivorship, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Kujala and patient satisfaction were compared between phenotypes and sagittal tibial wear patterns. RESULTS: A total of 618 knees were included at a mean follow-up of 4.1 [2.0-9.6] years. Four-year conversion to the TKA survival rate was 98.9% [98.4%-99.3%] and 94.3% [93.3%-95.3%] for all-cause revision. Patients with preservation of the CPAK phenotype (84.5 ± 14.9, 81.8 ± 15.5, p = 0.033) and restoration of prearthritic coronal alignment (84.1 ± 14.9, 81.7 ± 15.9, p = 0.045) had a significantly higher Kujala score. No other significant differences in survivorship or PROMs were observed between phenotypes or sagittal tibial wear patterns. Additionally, no difference in survival rates was observed between preserved or altered phenotypes. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that preservation of CPAK phenotype and preservation of prearthritic coronal alignment yielded a significantly higher Kujala score. No other significant differences in PROMs or implant survivorship were observed, suggesting that robotic-assisted, ligament-guided medial UKA provides equal outcomes for all observed phenotypes and sagittal tibial wear patterns in medial compartment OA as long as preoperative CPAK phenotype is preserved postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

One-day surgery is safe and effective in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A prospective comparative study at 1 year of follow-up.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes and complications of two perioperative protocols for the management of patients who underwent medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA): 24 h (1-day surgery [OS]) versus 72 h (enhanced recovery after surgery [ERAS]) of the length of hospital stay (LOS). In our hypothesis, the reduction of the LOS from 3 to 1 day did not influence the outcomes and complications. METHODS: A total of 42 patients (21 in each group) with isolated anteromedial knee osteoarthritis and meeting specific criteria were prospectively included in the study. Clinical outcomes included Knee Society Score (KSS) and Forgotten joint score while pain evaluation was performed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Functional outcomes were assessed measuring the knee range of motion (ROM) while radiographic outcomes were evaluated measuring the amelioration of the varus deformity through the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA). RESULTS: Clinical and functional outcomes did not significantly differ between the two groups. Complications occurred in 9.5% of OS and 4.7% of ERAS group patients. Significant improvements in knee ROM, VAS pain, KSS and HKA angle were observed postsurgery, with no significant differences between groups except in KSS expectations and function trends. CONCLUSION: The OS protocol is safe and effective and LOS, in a well-defined fast-track protocol, did not significantly impact clinical and functional outcomes. OS may lead to reduced hospitalisation costs and potential reductions in complications associated with prolonged stays, benefiting both patients and healthcare facilities. However, further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is needed to confirm these findings. Early mobilisation and rehabilitation protocols are key components of successful patient recovery following UKA procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Minimally invasive Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement in patients 50 years of age or younger.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to assess clinical outcome and mid-term survivorship of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients 50 years of age or younger. METHODS: This study reports the results of 119 patients (130 knees) following mobile-bearing medial UKA. Primary indication was advanced osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle. The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) as well as the collateral ligaments were functionally intact, the varus deformity was manually correctable and there was no evidence of osteoarthritis in the lateral compartment. Survivorship analysis was performed with different endpoints and clinical outcome was measured using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), American Knee Society Score and Functional Score (AKSS-O, AKSS-F), range of motion (ROM), Tegner activity score, University of California Los Angeles score (UCLA) and visual analogue scale for pain (VAS). RESULTS: The survival rate was 96.6% at 6.5 years (95% CI 98.7-91.3%; number at risk: 56) and 91.7% (95% CI 96.7-80%; number at risk: 22) at 10 years for the endpoint device related revisions and 91.5% at 6.5 years (95% CI 95.4-84.5%; number at risk: 56) and 86.8% (95% CI 93-76.2%; number at risk: 22) at 10 years for the endpoint revision for any reason. Outcome scores, VAS and ROM showed significant improvements (p < 0.001). The mean OKS increased from 26.7 (standard deviation (sd): 7.2) preoperatively to 40.9 (sd: 7.6) at final follow-up, the mean AKSS-O from 48.3 (sd: 13.3) to 87.8 (sd: 14.4) and the mean ROM from 118° (sd: 16.7) to 125° (sd: 11.4). The radiological analysis revealed progression of degenerative changes in the lateral compartment in 39.6% of patients without affecting the functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Medial mobile-bearing UKA is a viable surgical treatment option in young patients with significant improvements in knee function and pain. Further follow-up is necessary to evaluate the long-term efficacy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, Level III.

Difference between medial and lateral tibia plateau in the coronal plane: importance of preoperative evaluation for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Setting bone cutting levels for different joint line orientations of the medial and lateral tibia plateaus in individual patients is not clear. We aimed to evaluate the difference between joint line orientation of the medial and lateral tibia plateaus relative to the horizontal line of mechanical axis of tibia as tibial plateau difference (TPD) for an optimal tibial bone cut in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and determine which factors could influence TPD. We aimed to investigate the effect of preoperative TPD on polyethylene liner size in medial UKA. METHODS: TPD in the coronal plane were measured in 181 female patients (181 knees). To determine the morphology of proximal tibia according to the severity of osteoarthritis, the patients were classified into three groups based on diagnosis and treatment: 80 who underwent robot-assisted medial UKA, 45 who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and 56 with early-stage osteoarthritis (OA) who had conservative management. Also, we divided the medial UKA group into two groups according to TPD (greater than or less than 5 mm) and compared polyethylene liner sizes. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in TPD (p = 0.662), difference between the medial and lateral femoral condyle levels (p = 0.54), medial proximal tibial angle (p = 0.169), or posterior tibial slope (p = 0.466) among the three groups. Increased TPD was significantly associated with increased mechanical femorotibial angle(mFTA) (p < 0.01). The medial UKA group was divided into two groups according to TPD greater or less than 5 mm. Thicker polyethylene liners were used for groups with TPD greater than 5 mm (8.5 ± 0.7 mm versus 8.2 ± 0.3 mm, p = 0.01). Additionally, the proportion of patients using the thinnest polyethylene (8 mm) in each TPD group (greater or less than 5 mm) was higher in patients with TPD less than 5 mm (82.4% versus 58.7%, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative measurement of TPD is important to help surgeons predict the most appropriate bone cutting level in the coronal plane in primary medial UKA. Tibial bone resection would be likely to be thicker than needed in patients with increased TPD in medial UKA.

Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to patients with a ligamentous deficiency can cause biomechanically poor outcomes.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to investigate the biomechanical effects of the deficiency of the collateral ligament and cruciate ligament in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in normal and varus knee patients using computational simulation. METHODS: Validated finite-element (FE) models for conditions of various cruciate and collateral ligament deficiencies were developed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of ligamentous deficiency in UKA for normal and varus knee patients. Contact stresses on the polyethylene (PE) insert, contact stresses on the lateral articular cartilage, and quadriceps force were analyzed under gait-loading conditions. RESULTS: Contact stresses on the PE insert and lateral articular cartilage as well as quadriceps force in a normal knee UKA FE model were increased in the order of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency, medial collateral ligament (MCL) deficiency, lateral collateral ligament (LCL) deficiency, and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) deficiency in the stance phase of gait cycle, as compared with those in the model without ligamentous deficiency. In two or more multiple ligamentous deficiencies, contact stresses on the PE insert and articular lateral cartilage and quadriceps force were significantly increased versus in the case of single-ligament deficiency. CONCLUSION: Poor outcomes of medial UKA in patients with ACL or MCL deficiency can be predicted. Care should be taken to extend the indications when performing medial UKA in patients with ligamentous deficiency, especially when varus knee with ACL or MCL deficiency is present.

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Short to Mid-Term Survivorship, and the Effect of Patient and Implant Characteristics: An Analysis of Data From the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.

BACKGROUND: The rarity of lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) results in a lack of large cohort studies and understanding. The aim of this study is to comprehensively evaluate survivorship of lateral UKA with registry data and compare this to medial UKA. METHODS: Lateral (n = 537) and medial UKAs (n = 19,295) in 2007-2017 were selected from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Survival analyses were performed with revision for any reason as primary endpoint. Adjustments were made for patient and implant characteristics. Stratified analyses according to patient and implant characteristics were performed. Reasons and type of revision were grouped according to laterality and bearing design. RESULTS: The 5-year revision rate was 12.9% for lateral UKA and 9.3% for medial UKA. Multivariable regression analyses showed no significant increased risk for revision for lateral UKA (hazard ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.66-1.15). Stratified analyses showed that the effect of patient characteristics on revision was comparable between lateral and medial UKA; however, the use of mobile-bearing design for lateral UKA was associated with increased revision rate. Progression of osteoarthritis was the main reason for revision on both sides accompanied by tibia component loosening for medial UKA. Reasons and type of revision varied depending on bearing design. CONCLUSION: Similar survivorship of lateral and medial UKA was reported. Specifically, there is a notable risk for revision when using mobile-bearing designs for lateral UKA. Failure modes and type of revision depends on laterality and bearing design. These findings emphasize that surgical challenges related to anatomy and kinematics of the lateral and medial knee compartment need to be considered.

Outcomes After Arthroscopic Evaluation of Patients With Painful Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Persistent pain after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a prevailing reason for revision to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Many of these pathologies can be addressed arthroscopically. The purpose of this study is to examine the outcomes of patients who undergo an arthroscopy for any reason after medial UKA. METHODS: A query of our practice registry revealed 58 patients who had undergone medial UKA between October 2003 and June 2015 with subsequent arthroscopy. Mean interval from medial UKA to arthroscopy was 22 months (range 1-101 months). Indications for arthroscopy were acute anterior cruciate ligament tear (1), arthrofibrosis (7), synovitis (12), recurrent hemarthrosis (2), lateral compartment degeneration including isolated lateral meniscus tears (11), and loose cement fragments (25). RESULTS: Mean follow-up after arthroscopy was 49 months (range 1-143 months). Twelve patients have been revised from UKA to TKA. Relative risk of revision after arthroscopy for lateral compartment degeneration was 4.27 (6 of 11; 55%; P = .002) and for retrieval of loose cement fragments was 0.05 (0 of 25; 0%; P = .03). Relative risk for revision after arthroscopy for anterior cruciate ligament tear, arthrofibrosis, synovitis, or recurrent hemarthrosis did not meet clinical significance secondary to the low number of patients in these categories. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that arthroscopic retrieval of cement fragments does not compromise UKA longevity. However, arthroscopy for lateral compartment degradation after UKA, while not the cause of revision, appears to be an ineffective treatment and predicts a high risk of revision to TKA regardless of its relative radiographic insignificance.

Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement for the treatment of arthritis progression after medial unicompartmental replacement.

PURPOSE: Lateral progression of arthritis following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), although infrequent, is still the most common reason for revision surgery. Treatment options normally include conversion to total knee arthroplasty. An alternative strategy for some patients may be addition of a lateral UKA. We report the first results of staged bi-compartmental UKA (Bi-UKA) strategy. METHODS: We retrospectively selected from our UKA database patients who underwent a lateral UKA to treat a symptomatic lateral osteoarthritis progression after a medial UKA. The analysis included a clinical and radiological assessment of each patient. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients for a total of 27 knees of staged Bi-UKA were carried out in a single centre. The mean time interval between primary medial UKA and the subsequent lateral UKA was 8.1 years (SD ± 4.6 years). The mean age at the time of the Bi-UKA was 77.1 years (SD ± 6.5 years). The median hospital stay was 3 (range 2-9 days) days, and the mean follow-up after Bi-UKA was 4 years (SD ± 1.9 years). The functional scores showed a significant improvement as compared to the pre-operative status (paired t test, p = 0.003). There were no radiological evidences of failure. None of the patients needed blood transfusion, and there was no significant complications related to the surgical procedure without further surgeries or revisions at final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that addition of a lateral UKA for arthritis progression following medial UKA is a good option in appropriately selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Observational study without controls, Level IV.

Why Do Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties Fail Today?

BACKGROUND: Failure rates are higher in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) than total knee arthroplasty. To improve these failure rates, it is important to understand why medial UKA fail. Because individual studies lack power to show failure modes, a systematic review was performed to assess medial UKA failure modes. Furthermore, we compared cohort studies with registry-based studies, early with midterm and late failures and fixed-bearing with mobile-bearing implants. METHODS: Databases of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane and annual registries were searched for medial UKA failures. Studies were included when they reported >25 failures or when they reported early (<5 years), midterm (5-10 years), or late failures (>10 years). RESULTS: Thirty-seven cohort studies (4 level II studies and 33 level III studies) and 2 registry-based studies were included. A total of 3967 overall failures, 388 time-dependent failures, and 1305 implant design failures were identified. Aseptic loosening (36%) and osteoarthritis (OA) progression (20%) were the most common failure modes. Aseptic loosening (26%) was most common early failure mode, whereas OA progression was more commonly seen in midterm and late failures (38% and 40%, respectively). Polyethylene wear (12%) and instability (12%) were more common in fixed-bearing implants, whereas pain (14%) and bearing dislocation (11%) were more common in mobile-bearing implants. CONCLUSION: This level III systematic review identified aseptic loosening and OA progression as the major failure modes. Aseptic loosening was the main failure mode in early years and mobile-bearing implants, whereas OA progression caused most failures in late years and fixed-bearing implants.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty questionnaire (UniQ-study): Unknown is unloved.

BACKGROUND: Almost 50% of the patients requiring knee replacement are suitable for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, national registries have shown a use far below 50%. AIM: The aim of this study was to identify the factors that could influence the use of UKA. METHODS: A questionnaire was conducted among practicing knee surgeons of the Dutch Orthopedic Association. The questionnaire was classified into three domains: surgeon, patient selection, and professional opinion. Associations between the domains and UKA volume and contra-indications were tested using Pearson's chi-square tests. RESULTS: Of the 113 included respondents, 40% had no hands-on exposure during residency. Frequently reported contra-indications were obesity (68%), lateral osteophytes (21%), chondrocalcinosis (20%), and age (20%). Medial partial thickness lesions were considered a contra-indication by 49% and lateral joint space narrowing by 61% of the respondents. Respondents perceived UKA to outperform total knee arthroplasty regarding all outcomes, except survival (1.8% versus 42%). The reported barriers for UKA use were insufficient experience (20%), high revision rates (20%), and low hospital volume (16%), whereas 60% did not experience any at all. Hands-on UKA exposure during residency was associated with an increased use of correct indications. Furthermore, the use of correct indications was associated with an increased UKA volume. CONCLUSION: We showed a low UKA exposure during residency and considerable variations in contra-indications. These factors may contribute to an underuse of UKA. Improved UKA training could lead to increased experience and better patient selection among surgeons and consequently a higher use of medial UKA.

Finite element study of stress distribution in medial UKA under varied lower limb alignment.

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) has a high incidence among the elderly, significantly impacting their quality of life and overall health. Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an excellent choice for treating knee single-compartment lesions, and lower limb alignment has a profound impact on medial UKA. To explore the influence of different lower limb alignments on medial UKA. In this study, we selected MR and CT data of healthy adult male knee joints to establish a complete finite element analysis (FEA) model of the knee joint. After validation, we established a finite element model of medial UKA. Subsequently, we created 60 sets of FEA models with different lower limb alignments to analyze the impact of different lower limb alignments on medial UKA. A vertical load of 1000 N was applied to the FEA models with different lower limb alignments. During the process of shifting the Mikulicz line from the midpoint of the knee joint towards the medial side, the lower limb load was primarily concentrated on the medial compartment. The stress values of the lateral meniscus, tibial cartilage, and femoral cartilage gradually decreased. ROI (region of interest) 1 and ROI 2 showed the maximum principal strain changes, while ROI 3 and ROI 4 exhibited less pronounced fluctuations, with the maximum principal strain roughly proportionally increased. During the process of shifting the Mikulicz line towards the lateral side from the midpoint of the knee joint, the stress on the lateral compartment increased observably. ROI 1, ROI 2, ROI 3, and ROI 4 showed decreased maximum principal strains, approximately inversely proportional changes, but the overall reduction was relatively small. Different lower limb alignments have a profound impact on the short- and long-term joint function after UKA. When the Mikulicz line is 10 mm inside the midpoint of the knee joint or slightly outside, there is a relatively lower risk of tibial component fractures, lower stress on the lateral compartment, and lower load on the prosthesis. During medial UKA, measures such as bone resection and prosthesis selection should be taken to ensure that the Mikulicz line is in the ideal position.

Perfect Indications and How to Avoid Complications in Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (LUKA) is a favorable alternative to distal femoral osteotomy and total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated lateral compartment knee osteoarthritis; however, it only accounts for less than 1% of the total number of knee replacements documented in national joint registries. The anatomy and biomechanics of the lateral knee compartment differ from the medial side, with a greater intrinsic laxity of the lateral collateral ligament complex compared to medial structures. Indications and surgical techniques must be tailored to each unicompartmental replacement to optimize outcomes and mitigate complications. This article will discuss the clinical indications, preoperative evaluation and workup, surgical technique, and outcomes for LUKA.

Long-Term Outcomes in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Survivorship of Medial versus Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) currently represent an important portion of knee arthroplasty procedures and their usage is on an upward trend. Despite offering better functional outcomes and a quicker recovery compared to total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), UKAs are often scrutinized for their longevity. This article provides an in-depth examination of the technical nuances and survival rates of medial versus lateral UKAs, drawing on recent advances and findings in the field. This manuscript thoroughly evaluates the comparability of patient populations undergoing medial and lateral UKAs, considering their anatomical, biomechanical, and demographic differences. It delves into the specific technical challenges associated with each type and systematically assesses the factors that influence failure, including the intricacies of implant design and patient-specific variables. Despite relevant anatomical and biomechanical contrasts between medial and lateral UKAs, recent literature points to comparable survival rates. The prevalence of early failures within the initial five years post-operation underscores the criticality of precise patient selection and refined surgical techniques. The paper succinctly summarizes pivotal literature and provides essential guidance for optimizing UKA survivorship. It underscores the importance of meticulous patient selection and precise surgical techniques, alongside the identification and mitigation of potential pitfalls that impact outcomes. Finally, robotic technology in UKA has considerably enhanced the precision and reproducibility, representing a viable solution to effectively meet and achieve the recommended technical objectives.

Medial mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early survivorship and analysis of failures in 1000 consecutive cases.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a less invasive treatment for medial gonarthrosis. However, registry data have demonstrated higher revision and early failure rates. The purpose of this study is to report the early survivorship and failure modes in a series of 1000 consecutive medial mobile bearing UKA. UKA patients with a minimum of 2 year follow-up or those meeting the study endpoint (UKA failure or death) were included. Demographic variables, pre and post-operative clinical variables, and mode of failure were analyzed. Eight hundred and thirty-nine knees were included in the analysis. Forty revisions were performed at an average of 23.1 months (range, 2.3-74.2) following UKA for a survivorship of 95.2%. Indications for revision were aseptic loosening (15), tibial collapse (7), mobile bearing dislocation (2), persistent pain (12), progression of disease (2), infection (1), and tibiofemoral instability (1). These results are from a single center and may not be comparable to those of larger reports such as national registries.

Abnormal preoperative MRI does not correlate with failure of UKA.

Modern indications for medial mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) include a normal lateral compartment, minimal patellofemoral disease, and a ligamentously stable knee. Radiographs and intraoperative inspection can determine the appropriateness of UKA. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpretations can over-estimate the degree of knee pathology. This study reports the outcomes of UKA performed despite an abnormal MRI of the lateral compartment, patellofemoral compartment, and/or cruciate ligaments. One thousand consecutive medial UKAs were reviewed, and 33 patients had pre-operative MRI with interpretations of osteoarthritic changes in the lateral compartment, patellofemoral compartment, and/or deficiency of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). We compared the postoperative Knee Society pain score, total score, and functional score between the abnormal MRI group (n=33) and the remaining patients (n=967). Average follow-up was 43.4months and 38.3months for the two groups, respectively. Knee Society pain, total, and functional scores for the abnormal MRI group were 40.8, 88.7, and 78.5 respectively compared with 43.4, 90.6, and 80.0 respectively for the remaining patients. The failure rate was 3% (1/33) in the abnormal MRI group and 4% (39/967) in the remaining patients. Based on the numbers available, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of survival and clinical results. The results of this study suggest abnormal preoperative MRI findings do not have an influence on the outcome of UKA when modern radiographic and clinical criteria are met.

The Deep-MCL Line: A Reliable Anatomical Landmark to Optimize the Tibial Cut in UKA.

The extramedullary guides for the tibial resection during medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are inaccurate, with an error risk in coronal and sagittal planes and cut thickness. It was our hypothesis that the use of anatomical landmarks for the tibial cut can help the surgeon to improve accuracy. The technique described in this paper is based on the use of a simple and reproducible anatomical landmark. This landmark is the line of insertion of the fibers of the deep medial collateral ligament (MCL) around the anterior half of the medial tibial plateau called the "Deep MCL insertion line". The used anatomical landmark determines the orientation (in the coronal and sagittal planes) and the thickness of the tibial cut. This landmark corresponds to the line of insertion of the fibers of the deep MCL around the anterior half of the medial tibial plateau. A consecutive series of patients who underwent primary medial UKA between 2019 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 50 UKA were included. The mean age at the time of surgery was 54.5 ± 6.6 years (44-79). The radiographic measurements showed very good to excellent intra-observer and inter-observer agreements. The limb and implant alignments and the tibial positioning were satisfying, with a low rate of outliers and good restoration of the native anatomy. The landmark of the insertion of deep MCL constitutes a reliable and reproducible reference for the tibial cut axis and thickness during medial UKA, independent of the wear severity.

A direct referencing method of the tibial plateau for the posterior tibial slope in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: There is no consensus on intraoperative references for the posterior tibial slope (PTS) in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). An arthroscopic hook probe placed on the medial second quarter of the medial tibial plateau (MTP) in an anteroposterior direction may be used as a direct anatomical reference for the PTS. The purpose of this study is to investigate the availability and accuracy of this method. METHODS: Marginal osteophyte formation and subchondral depression of the MTP and angles between the bony MTP and the cartilage MTP were retrospectively evaluated using preoperative sagittal MRI of 73 knees undergoing medial UKA. In another 36 knees, intraoperative lateral knee radiographs with the probe placed on the MTP were prospectively taken in addition to the preoperative MRI. Then, angles between the bony MTP and the probe axis and angles between the preoperative bony MTP and the postoperative implant MTP were measured. RESULTS: Among 73 knees, one knee with grade 4 osteoarthritis had a posterior osteophyte higher than the most prominent point of the cartilage MTP. No subchondral depression affected the direct reference of the MTP. The mean angle between the bony MTP and the cartilage MTP was -0.8° ± 0.7° (-2.6°-1.0°, n = 72), excluding one knee with a "high" osteophyte. The mean angle between the bony MTP and the probe axis on the intraoperative radiograph was -0.6° ± 0.4° (-1.7-0.0, n = 36). The mean angle between the pre- and postoperative MTP was -0.5° ± 1.5° (-2.9°-1.8°). The root-mean-square (RMS) error of these two PTS angles was 1.6° with this method. CONCLUSION: Cartilage remnants, osteophyte formation and subchondral bone depression do not affect the direct referencing method in almost all knees for which medial UKA is indicated. When the posterior "high" osteophyte of the MTP is noted on preoperative radiography, preoperative MRI or CT scan is recommended to confirm no "high" osteophyte on the medial second quarter. The accuracy of this method seems equal to that of robotic-assisted surgery (the RMS error in previous reports, 1.6°-1.9°).

Referencing the Tibial Plateau With a Probe Improves the Accuracy of the Posterior Slope in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: There is currently no consensus on intraoperative references for determining the posterior tibial slope (PTS) in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The medial tibial plateau could serve as a direct reference for determining the native PTS through the placement of a hook probe in the anteroposterior direction of the medial tibial plateau. This study aimed to examine the accuracy of this new referencing method. Methods: We consecutively performed 55 medial UKAs using our new method (study group), and the preoperative and postoperative PTS on lateral knee radiographs were examined. These outcomes were then compared with those of consecutive 50 medial UKAs performed using the conventional method (control group), which immediately preceded the start of the use of the new method. Results: The correlation coefficient between the preoperative and postoperative PTS of the study group was larger than that of the control group (0.887 and 0.482, respectively). The mean implantation error of the PTS in the study group was smaller than that of the control group (-1.1° ± 1.3° and -3.0° ± 3.2°, respectively; P < .0001). The percentages of knees within 2° of implantation error were 73% and 34% in the study and control groups, respectively (P < .0001). The root mean square errors in the study and control groups were 1.7° and 4.3°, respectively. Conclusions: The direct referencing method with a probe can significantly improve the accuracy of tibial sagittal alignment.

Computational analysis of tibial slope adjustment with fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in ACL- and PCL-deficient models.

AIMS: A functional anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) has been assumed to be required for patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, this assumption has not been thoroughly tested. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the biomechanical effects exerted by cruciate ligament-deficient knees with medial UKAs regarding different posterior tibial slopes. METHODS: ACL- or PCL-deficient models with posterior tibial slopes of 1°, 3°, 5°, 7°, and 9° were developed and compared to intact models. The kinematics and contact stresses on the tibiofemoral joint were evaluated under gait cycle loading conditions. RESULTS: Anterior translation increased in ACL-deficient UKA cases compared with intact models. In contrast, posterior translation increased in PCL-deficient UKA cases compared with intact models. As the posterior tibial slope increased, anterior translation of ACL-deficient UKA increased significantly in the stance phase, and posterior translation of PCL-deficient UKA increased significantly in the swing phase. Furthermore, as the posterior tibial slope increased, contact stress on the other compartment increased in cruciate ligament-deficient UKAs compared with intact UKAs. CONCLUSION: Fixed-bearing medial UKA is a viable treatment option for patients with cruciate ligament deficiency, providing a less invasive procedure and allowing patient-specific kinematics to adjust posterior tibial slope. Patient selection is important, and while AP kinematics can be compensated for by posterior tibial slope adjustment, rotational stability is a prerequisite for this approach. ACL- or PCL-deficient UKA that adjusts the posterior tibial slope might be an alternative treatment option for a skilled surgeon. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(7):494-502.

Robotic arm-assisted versus manual unicompartmental knee arthroplasty : a systematic review and meta-analysis of the MAKO robotic system.

AIMS: This systematic review aims to compare the precision of component positioning, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), complications, survivorship, cost-effectiveness, and learning curves of MAKO robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RAUKA) with manual medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA). METHODS: Searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar were performed in November 2021 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta--Analysis statement. Search terms included "robotic", "unicompartmental", "knee", and "arthroplasty". Published clinical research articles reporting the learning curves and cost-effectiveness of MAKO RAUKA, and those comparing the component precision, functional outcomes, survivorship, or complications with mUKA, were included for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 179 articles were identified from initial screening, of which 14 articles satisfied the inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. The papers analyzed include one on learning curve, five on implant positioning, six on functional outcomes, five on complications, six on survivorship, and three on cost. The learning curve was six cases for operating time and zero for precision. There was consistent evidence of more precise implant positioning with MAKO RAUKA. Meta-analysis demonstrated lower overall complication rates associated with MAKO RAUKA (OR 2.18 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06 to 4.49); p = 0.040) but no difference in re-intervention, infection, Knee Society Score (KSS; mean difference 1.64 (95% CI -3.00 to 6.27); p = 0.490), or Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score (mean difference -0.58 (95% CI -3.55 to 2.38); p = 0.700). MAKO RAUKA was shown to be a cost-effective procedure, but this was directly related to volume. CONCLUSION: MAKO RAUKA was associated with improved precision of component positioning but was not associated with improved PROMs using the KSS and WOMAC scores. Future longer-term studies should report functional outcomes, potentially using scores with minimal ceiling effects and survival to assess whether the improved precision of MAKO RAUKA results in better outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(5):541-548.