RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Various medical conditions and the drugs used to treat them have been shown to impede or complicate dental implant surgery. It is crucial to carefully monitor the medical status and potential post-operative complications of patients with systemic diseases, particularly elderly patients, to minimize the risk of health complications that may arise. AIM: The purpose of this study was to review the existing evidence on the viability of dental implants in patients with systemic diseases and to provide practical recommendations to achieve the best possible results in the corresponding patient population. METHODS: The information for our study was compiled using data from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases and searched separately for each systemic disease included in our work until October 2023. An additional manual search was also performed to increase the search sensitivity. Only English-language publications were included and assessed according to titles, abstracts and full texts. RESULTS: In total, 6784 studies were found. After checking for duplicates and full-text availability, screening for the inclusion criteria and manually searching reference lists, 570 articles remained to be considered in this study. CONCLUSION: In treating patients with systemic conditions, the cost-benefit analysis should consider the patient's quality of life and expected lifespan. The success of dental implants depends heavily on ensuring appropriate maintenance therapy, ideal oral hygiene standards, no smoking and avoiding other risk factors. Indications and contraindications for dental implants in cases of systemic diseases are yet to be more understood; broader and hardcore research needs to be done for a guideline foundation.
Assuntos
Implantes Dentários , Humanos , Implantes Dentários/efeitos adversos , Qualidade de Vida , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Análise Custo-Benefício , Fatores de Risco , Assistência Odontológica para Doentes CrônicosRESUMO
Polyneuropathy is a disease of the peripheral nervous system that usually results in distally emphasized, often symmetrical sensory and motor stimulation and deficits. These are often extremely painful. They can be divided into hereditary and acquired causes; inflammatory and infectious causes should be further differentiated among the acquired causes. A careful diagnostic workup is essential. Clinical signs and distribution patterns of symptoms can often already provide clues to the underlying aetiology. This review describes this workup, which in addition to the medical history and clinical examination always includes thorough laboratory diagnostics, electrophysiological examination and cerebrospinal fluid diagnostics. In individual cases, further diagnostic steps may be necessary in order to make the correct diagnosis.
Assuntos
Polineuropatias , Polineuropatias/diagnóstico , Polineuropatias/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Exame Neurológico , Eletrodiagnóstico , Exame Físico , AnamneseRESUMO
PURPOSE: In 2018, there were 68 million sexually transmitted infections in the United States. Sexual history screening is an evidence-based practice endorsed by guidelines to identify risk of these infections and adverse sexual health outcomes. In this mixed methods study, we investigated patient- and clinician-level characteristics associated with receipt of sexual history screening, and contextualized these differences in more depth. METHODS: We collected sociodemographics of patients from the electronic health record and sociodemographics of their primary care clinicians via a census survey. Semistructured interviews were conducted with key practice staff. We conducted multilevel crossed random effects logistic regression analysis and thematic analysis on quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 53,246 patients and 56 clinicians from 13 clinical sites participated. Less than one-half (42.4%) of the patients had any sexual history screening documented in their health record. Patients had significantly higher odds of documented screening if they were gay or lesbian (OR = 1.23), were cisgender women (OR = 1.10), or had clinicians who were cisgender women (OR = 1.80). Conversely, patients' odds of documented screening fell significantly with age (OR per year = 0.99) and with the number of patients their clinicians had on their panels (OR per patient = 0.99), and their odds were significantly lower if their primary language was not English (OR = 0.91). In interviews, key staff expressed discomfort discussing sexual health and noted assumptions about patients who are older, in long-term relationships, or from other cultures. Discordance of patient-clinician gender and patients' sexual orientation were also noted as barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions are needed to address the interplay between the social and contextual factors identified in this study, especially those that elicited discomfort, and the implementation of sexual history screening.
Assuntos
Comportamento Sexual , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estados Unidos , Identidade de Gênero , Inquéritos e Questionários , Registros Eletrônicos de SaúdeRESUMO
The use of Structured Diagnostic Assessments (SDAs) is a solution for unreliability in psychiatry and the gold standard for diagnosis. However, except for studies between the 50 s and 70 s, reliability without the use of Non-SDAs (NSDA) is seldom tested, especially in non-Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) countries. We aim to measure reliability between examiners with NSDAs for psychiatric disorders. We compared diagnostic agreement after clinician change, in an outpatient academic setting. We used inter-rater Kappa measuring 8 diagnostic groups: Depression (DD: F32, F33), Anxiety Related Disorders (ARD: F40-F49, F50-F59), Personality Disorders (PD: F60-F69), Bipolar Disorder (BD: F30, F31, F34.0, F38.1), Organic Mental Disorders (Org: F00-F09), Neurodevelopment Disorders (ND: F70-F99) and Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders (SSD: F20-F29). Cohen's Kappa measured agreement between groups, and Baphkar's test assessed if any diagnostic group have a higher tendency to change after a new diagnostic assessment. We analyzed 739 reevaluation pairs, from 99 subjects who attended IPUB's outpatient clinic. Overall inter-rater Kappa was moderate, and none of the groups had a different tendency to change. NSDA evaluation was moderately reliable, but the lack of some prevalent hypothesis inside the pairs raised concerns about NSDA sensitivity to some diagnoses. Diagnostic momentum bias (that is, a tendency to keep the last diagnosis observed) may have inflated the observed agreement. This research was approved by IPUB's ethical committee, registered under the CAAE33603220.1.0000.5263, and the UTN-U1111-1260-1212.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Due to the increased number of syphilis infections diagnosed in the UK and beyond, we reviewed our data on blood donors infected with syphilis in the UK and Ireland between 2016 and 2019. METHODS: Data were extracted from the surveillance database for all blood donors confirmed positive for syphilis in the UK and Ireland between 2016 and 2019, together with the total number of donations tested during that period. Data on positive cases included gender, age group, reported treatment, symptoms and confirmatory results. All cases were divided into recently acquired within 24 months and past syphilis infection. We also reviewed the information on symptoms characteristic of syphilis reported by blood donors with an untreated syphilis infection during the postdonation discussions. RESULTS: Screening of 8 246 600 blood donations for treponemal antibodies identified 316 blood donors with confirmed syphilis infection in the UK and Ireland between 2016 and 2019 (1.6 per 100 000 donations). 42% of them (133 of 316) were classed as a recent infection based on their donation testing results, previous donation date and clinical history provided, and they were hence considered potentially infectious. Most of these blood donors (202 of 316, 64%) had not been previously diagnosed or treated for syphilis, although 50 of them reported symptoms consistent with syphilis infection and 19 had been misdiagnosed despite seeking medical help. CONCLUSIONS: This observational study shows that syphilis infection remains undiagnosed, especially among heterosexual men, and that infectious syphilis is often missed as a differential diagnosis even when donors have presented with genital or oral ulceration, rashes in the genital area and lymphadenopathy. Considering the recent resurgence of syphilis infections in the UK and beyond and our generally expanding sexual networks, it is important to consider syphilis in differential diagnosis even if specific risk factors have not been identified.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Sífilis , Doadores de Sangue , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Heterossexualidade , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Fatores de Risco , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Sífilis/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patient involvement in treatment decisions is widely accepted. Making a diagnosis, however, is still seen as a technical task mainly driven by physicians. Patients in this respect are perceived as passive providers of data. But, recent patient-centred concepts highlight the value of an active patient involvement in diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: We aim to reach a deeper understanding of how patients themselves contribute to the diagnostic process. METHODS: This is an observational study of patient consultations with their General Practitioner (GP) in 12 German practices. We performed a mixed-method qualitative and quantitative analysis of 134 primary care consultations. RESULTS: At the beginning of most consultations lies a phase where patients were invited to freely unfold their reason for encounter: This was named "inductive foraging" (IF). While patients actively present their complaints, GPs mainly listen and follow the presentation. This episode was found with every GP participating in this study. Ninety-one percent of consultations with diagnostic episodes were opened by IF. IF had a major contribution to the number of cues (diagnostic information) yielded in the diagnostic process. We illustrate a variety of tactics GPs make use of to invite, support, and terminate their patients in IF. CONCLUSION: IF was found to be a highly relevant strategy in the diagnostic process. Patient involvement through IF offered a major contribution of diagnostic cues. We hypothesize that a patient-centred approach improves diagnosis.
Making a diagnosis is a central part in medicine. Before advising treatments, physicians need to understand patients' complaints and ideally the reason for their symptoms. Generating an accurate diagnosis is often attributed to clinicians asking many specific questions and performing an array of tests. The patients' task in turn is passively answering "yes" or "no," or donating blood. In this study, we shed a different light on the phenomenon of diagnosis. We observed and recorded 295 primary care consultations. After each consultation, GPs were asked to reflect on their diagnostic thinking during the encounter. At the beginning of consultations, we witnessed a phase where patients were invited to freely report their complains and unfold their reason for encounter. Here, physicians mainly listened to their patients and motivated for further elaboration. We termed this phase "inductive foraging." GPs received the majority of diagnostic information (cues) during this phase. We therefore belief that an active patient involvement may improve diagnosis.
Assuntos
Clínicos Gerais , Humanos , Participação do Paciente , Relações Médico-Paciente , Encaminhamento e ConsultaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Media coverage of Lyme disease (LD) has led to an increase in consultations for presumed LD in Europe. However, LD is confirmed in only 10%-20% of patients, with a significant number remaining in a diagnostic dead-end. OBJECTIVES: To reach a deeper understanding of how patients themselves contribute to the diagnostic process. To describe the genesis of the LD hypothesis in care pathways. METHODS: In 2019, 30 patients from a prospective cohort consulting in the infectious diseases department at University Hospital in Marseille for presumed LD were recruited for semistructured interviews. The inclusion criteria were: suffering from subjective symptoms for 6 months, no clinical or paraclinical argument suggesting current LD. The patients' medical trajectories were collected using a biographical approach. RESULTS: The diagnosis of LD was primarily triggered by identification with personal testimonies found on the Internet. Most of patients were leading their own diagnostic investigation. The majority of participants were convinced they had LD despite the lack of medical evidence and the scepticism of their referring GP. CONCLUSION: GPs should first systematically explore patients' aetiologic representations in order to improve adherence to the diagnosis especially in the management of medically unexplained symptoms. Long COVID-19 syndrome challenge offers an opportunity to promote active patient involvement in diagnosis.
RESUMO
Background & objectives: As per national guidelines, prospective blood donors with a history of jaundice of unknown cause are deferred permanently to prevent the transmission of hepatitis B and C. The validity of this guideline was tested by comparing prevalence rates of hepatitis B and C in prospective blood donors deferred due to a history of jaundice, with that of donors who were found fit. Methods: Blood samples of 212 consecutive donors (male, n=203) deferred due to a history of jaundice were studied for hepatitis B and C by rapid test kits as well as by chemiluminescence (n=115) or ELISA (n=97). Consecutive healthy donors (n=549; male, n=518) were also studied by ELISA (n=266) or chemiluminescence (n=283). Results: The cumulative prevalence detected by rapid test kit and ELISA/chemiluminescence tests of hepatitis B (n=10) and C (n=2) among donors deferred due to a history of jaundice (n=212) was 5.7 per cent [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.9, 9.9]. The prevalence of reactive results among healthy donors (n=549) by ELISA/chemiluminescence tests was 3.3 per cent (95% CI: 1.9, 5.2), which included hepatitis B (n=15) and hepatitis C (n=3) cases. Compared to healthy donors, the odds of seropositivity among jaundice-deferred donors was 1.7 (95% CI: 0.8, 3.6), P=0.15. For rapid test-negative deferred donors, the odds of seropositivity by ELISA/chemiluminescence declined to 0.4 (0.1, 1.5), P=0.19. Interpretation & conclusions: The prevalence rates of hepatitis B and C in prospective blood donors deferred due to a history of jaundice of unknown aetiology did not differ significantly from that in healthy donors. The current practice of permanently deferring such donors depletes valuable donor pool. A strategy of rejecting only those donors who are found reactive on pre-donation testing by rapid test needs further validation.
Assuntos
Hepatite B , Hepatite C , Icterícia , Masculino , Humanos , Doadores de Sangue , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Hepatite C/complicações , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Hepatite B/complicações , Hepatite B/epidemiologia , Hepatite B/prevenção & controle , Icterícia/epidemiologia , Antígenos de Superfície da Hepatite BRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Many medical conditions, perhaps 80% of them, can be diagnosed by taking a thorough history of present illness (HPI). However, in the clinical setting, situational factors such as interruptions and time pressure may cause interactions with patients to be brief and fragmented. One solution for improving clinicians' ability to collect a thorough HPI and maximize efficiency and quality of care could be to use a digital tool to obtain the HPI before face-to-face evaluation by a clinician. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to identify and characterize digital tools that have been designed to obtain the HPI directly from patients or caregivers and present this information to clinicians before a face-to-face encounter. We also sought to describe outcomes reported in testing of these tools, especially those related to usability, efficiency, and quality of care. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review using predefined search terms in the following databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Embase, IEEE Xplore Digital Library, ACM Digital Library, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Two reviewers screened titles and abstracts for relevance, performed full-text reviews of articles meeting the inclusion criteria, and used a pile-sorting procedure to identify distinguishing characteristics of the tools. Information describing the tools was primarily obtained from identified peer-reviewed sources; in addition, supplementary information was obtained from tool websites and through direct communications with tool creators. RESULTS: We identified 18 tools meeting the inclusion criteria. Of these 18 tools, 14 (78%) used primarily closed-ended and multiple-choice questions, 1 (6%) used free-text input, and 3 (17%) used conversational (chatbot) style. More than half (10/18, 56%) of the tools were tailored to specific patient subpopulations; the remaining (8/18, 44%) tools did not specify a target subpopulation. Of the 18 tools, 7 (39%) included multilingual support, and 12 (67%) had the capability to transfer data directly into the electronic health record. Studies of the tools reported on various outcome measures related to usability, efficiency, and quality of care. CONCLUSIONS: The HPI tools we identified (N=18) varied greatly in their purpose and functionality. There was no consensus on how patient-generated information should be collected or presented to clinicians. Existing tools have undergone inconsistent levels of testing, with a wide variety of different outcome measures used in evaluation, including some related to usability, efficiency, and quality of care. There is substantial interest in using digital tools to obtain the HPI from patients, but the outcomes measured have been inconsistent. Future research should focus on whether using HPI tools can lead to improved patient experience and health outcomes, although surrogate end points could instead be used so long as patient safety is monitored.
Assuntos
Cuidadores , Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Registros Eletrônicos de SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: With the help of digital tools patients' medical histories can be collected quickly and transferred into their electronic medical records. This information can facilitate treatment planning, reduce documentation work, and improve care. However, it is still unclear whether the information collected from patients in this way is reliable. In this study, we assess the accuracy of the information collected by patients using an app for medical history taking by comparing it with the information collected in a face-to-face medical interview. We also study the app's usability from the patients' point of view and analysing usage data. METHODS: We developed a software application (app) for symptom-oriented medical history taking specialized for general practice. Medical history taking will take place involving patients with acute somatic or psychological complaints (1) using the app and (2) verbally with trained study staff. To assess the perceived usability, patients will complete a questionnaire for the System Usability Scale. We will collect sociodemographic data, information about media use and health literacy, and app usage data. DISCUSSION: Digital tools offer the opportunity to improve patient care. However, it is not self-evident that the medical history taken by digital tools corresponds to the medical history that would be taken in an interview. If simply due to a design flaw patients answer questions about signs and symptoms that indicate possible serious underlying conditions 'wrong', this could have severe consequences. By additionally assessing the app's usability as perceived by a diverse group of patients, potential weaknesses in content, design and navigation can be identified and subsequently improved. This is essential in order to ensure that the app meets the need of different groups of patients. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00026659 , registered Nov 03 2021. World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set, https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx? TrialID = DRKS00026659.
Assuntos
Aplicativos Móveis , Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) may be clinically relevant for women in general practice. Although anorectal CT testing in this setting may prevent underdiagnosis and undertreatment, its feasibility is questioned as GPs currently rarely order anorectal CT tests, for yet unknown reasons. OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of anorectal CT testing in women in general practice. METHODS: GPs across the Netherlands were invited directly (n = 1481) and by snowball sampling (n = 330) to join an online cross-sectional survey that asked about the acceptability of and barriers for (standard) anorectal testing in women during CT-related consultations. Data were analysed with univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: The questionnaire was opened by 514 respondents (28%, 514/1811) and 394 fully completed it. GPs' acceptability of anorectal testing by either self-sampling or provider-sampling was high (86%). Twenty-eight percent of GPs felt neutral, and 43% felt accepting towards standard anorectal testing. Nevertheless, 40% of GPs had never tested for anorectal CT in women, which was associated with a reported difficulty in asking about anal sex (odds ratio [OR]: 3.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21-7.80), infrequency of anal sexual history taking (OR: 11.50, 95% CI: 6.39-20.72), low frequency of urogenital CT testing (OR 3.44, 95%-CI: 1.86-6.38) and with practicing in a non-urban area (OR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.48-3.48). Acceptability of anorectal testing was not associated with the studied factors. CONCLUSION: This quantitative survey shows that anorectal CT testing is feasible based on its acceptability, but is likely hindered by a lower awareness of (anorectal) CT in GPs.
BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is a sexually transmitted disease that occurs both vaginally and anorectally (anally) in women. Testing for anorectal CT may improve treatment outcomes, but GPs currently rarely order anorectal CT tests. It is therefore uncertain whether anorectal CT testing is feasible. OBJECTIVE: To find out whether anorectal CT testing in women by GPs is feasible. METHODS: We sent an online survey to GPs across the Netherlands and asked about (1) the acceptability of and (2) barriers for anorectal CT testing in women. RESULTS: GPs thought anorectal CT testing, either when the patient self-sampled or when the GP sampled, was acceptable (86%). Twenty-eight percent of GPs felt neutral, and 43% felt accepting towards standard anorectal testing. Nevertheless, 40% of GPs had never tested for anorectal CT in women. These GPs were more likely to find it difficult to ask women about anal sex, to do so less frequently, to less frequently offer CT tests all together and to work in a non-urban area. These factors imply a lower awareness of (anorectal) CT. CONCLUSION: This study shows that anorectal CT testing is feasible based on its acceptability, but is likely hindered by a lower awareness of (anorectal) CT.
Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia , Clínicos Gerais , Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Chlamydia trachomatis , Estudos Transversais , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of patient history associated with hip pain. DATA SOURCES: A systematic, computerized search of electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Web of Science), a search of the gray literature, and review of the primary author's personal library was performed. Hip-specific search terms were combined with diagnostic accuracy and subjective or self-report history-based search terms using the Boolean operator "AND." STUDY SELECTION: This systematic review was conducted and reported according to the protocol outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The inclusion criteria were: (1) patients with hip pain; (2) the statistical association of at least 1 patient history item was reported; (3) study designs appropriate for diagnostic accuracy; (4) adults aged ≥18 years; (5) written in English; and (6) used an acceptable reference standard for diagnosed hip pathology. Titles and abstracts of all database-captured citations were independently screened by at least 2 reviewers. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted information and data regarding author, year, study population, study design, criterion standard, and strength of association statistics associated with the subjective findings. DATA SYNTHESIS: For hip osteoarthritis (OA), a family history of OA (positive likelihood ratio [+LR], 2.13), history of knee OA (+LR, 2.06), report of groin or anterior thigh pain (+LR, 2.51-3.86), self-reported limitation in range of motion of 1 or both hips (+LR, 2.87), constant low back pain or buttock pain (+LR, 6.50), groin pain on the same side (+LR, 3.63), and a screening questionnaire (+LR, 3.87-13.29) were the most significant findings. For intra-articular hip pathology, crepitus (+LR, 3.56) was the most significant finding. CONCLUSIONS: Patient history plays a key role in differential diagnosis of hip pain and in some cases can be superior to objective tests and measures.
Assuntos
Artralgia/diagnóstico , Quadril/patologia , Anamnese/normas , Diagnóstico Diferencial , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Since 2017, the diagnosis of patients with orofacial pain at the University Center for Dental Medicine Basel has been supplemented by using standardized image graphics (Dolografie® [Affolter/Rüfenacht, Bern, Switzerland]). For this purpose, patients select from a set of 34 cards those that visually best match their pain and then explain the reason for their choice. OBJECTIVES: (1) How many cards are selected on average? (2) Do sex and age influence the choice of cards? (3) Are there preferences in the choice of cards? (4) Are there correlations between pain diagnostic categories (e.g., musculoskeletal versus neuropathic orofacial pain) and the cards selected? (4) Are there correlations between pain diagnostic categories (e.g., musculoskeletal versus neuropathic orofacial pain) and the selected cards? METHODS: The available complete pain anamnestic data of 143 patients were evaluated. RESULTS: (1) Patients selected an average of 3.5 cards to describe their pain. Up to six cards were sufficient for a detailed description of pain in almost all patients. With the 16 most frequently chosen cards, the majority of patients were able to adequately describe their pain. (2) Sex and age had no influence on the number of selected cards. (3) There were clear preferences: Card 02 was chosen most often (45 times), followed by cards 05 and 13 (27 times each). (4) A differentiating choice was made most clearly in neuropathic pain by a strong preference for card 28 and a disregard of card 18. CONCLUSION: The use of standardized image cards as a "visual communication tool" has proven to be a time-efficient procedure in the context of history taking, which helps to obtain clinically relevant information not previously expressed by the patient.
Assuntos
Dor Facial , Neuralgia , Dor Facial/diagnóstico , Humanos , Medição da Dor , SuíçaRESUMO
There are a number of reasons to exclude sexual transmitted infections (STI). In addition to testing patients presenting with symptoms like discharge, burning when urinating or genitals ulcers, risk-adapted STI tests should be offered. Medical history taking should include sexual orientation and practices, symptoms also of sex partners and symptom-free intervals, previous STI and other medical conditions (especially allergies against antibiotics), previous treatment, vaccination status, contraceptive methods and condom use. Clinical examination depends on anatomy, sexual practices and symptoms. It should always include the inspection of the genital and anal region, the throat and the skin. The goal is to also diagnose oral and anal STI and to provide guideline-based treatment including monitoring of outcome.
Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia , Gonorreia , Infecções por HIV , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Comportamento Sexual , Parceiros Sexuais , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Simulated consultations through virtual patients allow medical students to practice history-taking skills. Ideally, applications should provide interactions in natural language and be multi-case, multi-specialty. Nevertheless, few systems handle or are tested on a large variety of cases. We present a virtual patient dialogue system in which a medical trainer types new cases and these are processed without human intervention. To develop it, we designed a patient record model, a knowledge model for the history-taking task, and a termino-ontological model for term variation and out-of-vocabulary words. We evaluated whether this system provided quality dialogue across medical specialities (n = 18), and with unseen cases (n = 29) compared to the cases used for development (n = 6). Medical evaluators (students, residents, practitioners, and researchers) conducted simulated history-taking with the system and assessed its performance through Likert-scale questionnaires. We analysed interaction logs and evaluated system correctness. The mean user evaluation score for the 29 unseen cases was 4.06 out of 5 (very good). The evaluation of correctness determined that, on average, 74.3% (sd = 9.5) of replies were correct, 14.9% (sd = 6.3) incorrect, and in 10.7% the system behaved cautiously by deferring a reply. In the user evaluation, all aspects scored higher in the 29 unseen cases than in the 6 seen cases. Although such a multi-case system has its limits, the evaluation showed that creating it is feasible; that it performs adequately; and that it is judged usable. We discuss some lessons learned and pivotal design choices affecting its performance and the end-users, who are primarily medical students.
Assuntos
Estudantes de Medicina , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Interface Usuário-ComputadorRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Palliative care providers may face questions from patients and relatives regarding the heritability of cancers. Implications of such discussions for providers have been little explored. This study aimed to gather palliative care providers' views on their main needs, roles, and ethical concerns regarding cancer family history discussions. METHOD: The palliative care providers who participated in the 2015 and 2017 annual meetings of the Quebec Palliative Care Association were approached to complete a web-based questionnaire. Study participants answered the questionnaire between November 2016 and July 2017. They were asked to identify the most facilitating factor for cancer family history discussions, as well as their most important knowledge needs, potential role, and ethical concerns. Descriptive analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Ninety-four palliative care providers answered the questionnaire. Access to specialized resources to obtain information and protocols or guidelines were considered the most facilitating factors for cancer family history discussions by 32% and 20% of providers, respectively. Knowledge of hereditary cancers was the most relevant educational need for 53%. Thirty-eight per cent considered essential to be informed about their rights and duties regarding cancer family history discussions. Being attentive to patients' concerns and referring families to appropriate resources were identified as the most relevant roles for palliative care providers by 47% and 34% of respondents, respectively. Fifty-eight per cent agreed that cancer family history discussions should be initiated only if beneficial to family members. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Education on hereditary cancers made consensus among palliative care providers as the most important knowledge need regarding discussing cancer family history at the end of life. Nonetheless, other less commonly expressed needs, including access to genetics specialists, protocols, or guidelines, and awareness of provider rights and duties concerning such discussions, deserve attention. Answering providers' needs might help optimize cancer predisposition management in palliative care.
Assuntos
Anamnese , Neoplasias , Cuidados Paliativos , Morte , Família , Humanos , Neoplasias/genética , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To explore the characteristics of gastric microbiota in children with and without (Helicobacter pylori, H. pylori) infection who had family history of H. pylori infection. METHODS: Mucosal biopsy samples of the gastric corpus and gastric antrum were collected during the gastroscope. And the gastric mucosa flora's information of the two groups of children were obtained after sample DNA extraction, PCR amplification of the 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) V3-V4 region, high-throughput sequencing and data processing. All the samples with family history of H. pylori infection were divided into two groups, the H. pylori infection group (n=18) and the H. pylori non-infection group (n=24). Then the α-, ß-diversity and bacteria abundance of the gastric microbiota were compared between the H. pylori infection and non-infection groups at different taxonomic levels. The differential microbiota was found out by LEfSe analysis, and then the function of microbiota predicted using phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states (PICRUSt) method. RESULTS: There was statistically significant difference in α-diversity (P < 0.05) between the two groups, indicating that the H. pylori non-infection group had higher microbial richness than the H. pylori infection group. Moreover, the ß-diversity was significantly different as well (P < 0.05), which meant that the microbiota composition of the two groups was different. At the phyla level, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroides, Actinobacteria, and Fusobacteria were dominant in the two groups. At the genus level, Bacteroides, Prevotella, Streptococcus, and Neisseria, etc. were dominant in the H. pylori non-infected group. Meanwhile, Helicobacter and Haemophilus etc. were dominant in the H. pylori infected group. LEfSe analysis showed that the relative abundance of Bacteroides etc. at the genus level in the H. pylori non-infected group was significantly higher than that in the H. pylori infected group. Functional prediction showed that Bacteroides were positively correlated with amino acid and vitamin metabolism, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway and ansamycin synthesis pathway. CONCLUSION: The gastric microbiota between H. pylori positive and H. pylori negative in children with family history of H. pylori infection is significant different. Some gastric microbiota, such as Bacteroides, may have a potential relationship with H. pylori infection in children.
Assuntos
Infecções por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Microbiota , Criança , Mucosa Gástrica , Humanos , FilogeniaRESUMO
Fever of unknown origin is a rare clinical syndrome, that represents a significant diagnostic challenge. There have been described more than 200 potential diseases, that can manifest as a fever of unknown origin. These are classically divided into following categories: infections, non-infectious inflammatory diseases, malignancies, and other miscellaneous disorders. Each of the disease type is associated with rather characteristic symptoms, clinical signs and laboratory findings, which are individually non-specific, but may provide helpful clues for a further focused diagnostic work-up. The clinicians task is to be able to identify these hallmark clinical features and to correctly interpret their significance and limitations in the appropriate differential diagnostic context. The aim of this review is to provide up-to-date clinical research evidence and to propose a concise clue-oriented diagnostic approach.
Assuntos
Febre de Causa Desconhecida , Neoplasias , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Febre de Causa Desconhecida/diagnóstico , Febre de Causa Desconhecida/etiologia , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicaçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Family history (FH) of cardiovascular (CV) disease is a known CV risk factor. However, it is rarely considered for CV risk stratification. Furthermore, FH for metabolic diseases is generally overlooked. AIM: To evaluate, in a population of men with erectile dysfunction (ED), whether FH for cardio-metabolic diseases could provide insights into metabolic and sexual features and predict the occurrence of forthcoming major adverse CV events (MACE). METHODS: A consecutive series of 4,693 individuals (aged 51.3 ± 13.3 years) attending an Andrology outpatient clinic for ED was studied. A subset of these (n = 1,595) was evaluated retrospectively for MACE occurrence. OUTCOMES: Several metabolic and sexual function-related parameters were studied. For the retrospective study, information on an incident MACE was collected over a mean follow-up of 4.2 ± 2.5 years. RESULTS: A greater number of cardio-metabolic FH factors were associated with a worse metabolic profile, including higher waist circumference, triglycerides, glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, and diastolic blood pressure, as well as lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. An increased number of FH factors were associated with worse erectile function (odds ratio = 1.14[1.07;1.23], P < .0001), impaired penile dynamic peak systolic velocity, and lower testosterone levels. In the retrospective study, a positive cardiometabolic FH was associated with a significantly higher incidence of MACEs, even after adjusting for age and comorbidities (hazard ratio = 1.51[1.06-2.16], P = .023). Interestingly, when dividing the sample into high- and low-risk categories according to several CV risk factors (age, previous MACEs, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and comorbidities), FH was confirmed as a predictor of incident MACE only among the low-risk individuals. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Investigating FH for cardio-metabolic diseases is a quick and easy task that could help clinicians in identifying, among individuals with ED, those who deserve careful evaluation of CV and metabolic risk factors. Moreover, considering FH for CV risk stratification could predict MACEs in individuals who, according to conventional CV risk factors, would be erroneously considered at low risk. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: The large sample size and the systematic collection of MACEs through an administrative database, with no risk of loss at follow-up, represent strengths. The use of administrative database for MACE collection may lead to some misclassifications. The specific population of the study limits the generalizability of the results. CONCLUSION: FH is simple and inexpensive information that should be part of the CV risk assessment in all men with ED because it helps in the identification of those who need lifestyle and risk factor modifications and whose risk would otherwise be overlooked. Rastrelli G, Yannas D, Mucci B, et al. Family History for Cardio-Metabolic Diseases: A Predictor of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Men With Erectile Dysfunction. J Sex Med 2020;17:2370-2381.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Disfunção Erétil , Doenças Metabólicas , Adulto , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Disfunção Erétil/epidemiologia , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a family history of low back pain (LBP) influences patient outcomes and treatment effects following home exercises in older people with chronic LBP. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Local community. PARTICIPANTS: People older than 55 years with chronic LBP (N=60). INTERVENTIONS: Participants in the intervention group completed video game exercises for 60 minutes 3 times per week for 8 weeks. Participants in the control group were instructed to maintain their usual levels of activity and care seeking behaviors. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Participants indicated whether any of their immediate family members had a history of "any" LBP or "activity-limiting" LBP at baseline. We collected self-reported measures of pain, function, pain self-efficacy, care seeking, physical activity, disability, fear of movement and/or reinjury, and falls efficacy at baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. We performed regression analyses to determine whether a family history of LBP predicted patient outcomes and moderated the effects of home exercise. RESULTS: Participants with a family history of any LBP were less likely to be highly active than those without a family history (odds ratio, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01-0.42; P=.003). Home-based video game exercises led to improvements in function in those without a family history of activity-limiting LBP (ß=1.78; 95% CI, 0.56-3.00; P=.006) but not in those with a family history (ß=-0.17; 95% CI, -2.56 to 2.21; P=.880) (interaction P=.049). A family history of LBP did not influence the remaining patient outcomes or treatment effects. CONCLUSIONS: A family history of LBP appears to negatively influence physical activity levels in older people with chronic LBP. Further, home-based video game exercises appear to be beneficial for older people with chronic LBP that do not have a family history of LBP.