Noninvasive prenatal testing for chromosome aneuploidies and subchromosomal microdeletions/microduplications in a cohort of 8141 single pregnancies.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal aneuploidies by scanning cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma is rapidly becoming a first-tier aneuploidy screening test in clinical practices. With the development of whole-genome sequencing technology, small subchromosomal deletions and duplications that could not be detected by conventional karyotyping are now able to be detected with NIPT technology. METHODS: In the present study, we examined 8141 single pregnancies with NIPT to calculate the positive predictive values of each of the chromosome aneuploidies and the subchromosomal microdeletions and microduplications. RESULTS: We confirmed that the positive predictive values (PPV) for trisomy 13, trisomy 18, trisomy 21, and sex chromosome aneuploidy were 14.28%, 60%, 80%, and 45.83%, respectively. At the same time, we also found 51 (0.63%) positive cases for chromosomal microdeletions or microduplications but only 13 (36.11%) true-positive cases. These results indicate that NIPT for trisomy 21 detection had the highest accuracy, while accuracy was low for chromosomal microdeletion and microduplications. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, it is very important to improve the specificity, accuracy, and sensitivity of NIPT technology for the detection of subchromosomal microdeletions and microduplications.

BACs-on-Beads™ assay, a rapid aneuploidy test, improves the diagnostic yield of conventional karyotyping.

BACs-on-Beads (BoBs™) assay is a rapid aneuploidy test (RAT) that detects numerical chromosomal aneuploidies and multiple microdeletion/microduplication syndromes. This study was conducted to appraise the usefulness of the BoB™ assay as a complementary diagnostic tool to conventional karyotyping for the rapid detection of chromosomal aneuploidies. A total of 485 prenatal (amniotic fluid and chorionic villi) and blood/products of conception samples were collected between July 2013 and August 2018, and analyzed by the BoBs™ assay and cytogenetic karyotyping and further validated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Forty-three of 484 qualifying samples (8.9%) were identified as abnormal by the BoBs™ assay. The assay was comparable to karyotyping in the detection of common structural abnormalities (trisomy 21, trisomy 18, X, and Y), with a sensitivity of 96.0% and a specificity of 100%. BoBs™ assay detected 20 microdeletion and microduplication syndromes that were missed by karyotyping. BoBs™, however, missed 10 cases of polyploidies and chromosomal rearrangements which were identified by conventional karyotyping. Our findings suggest that BoBs™ is a reliable RAT which is suitable in combination with conventional karyotyping for the detection of common aneuploidies. The assay also improves the diagnostic yield by recognizing clinically relevant submicroscopic copy number gains and losses.

9q34.3 microduplications lead to neurodevelopmental disorders through EHMT1 overexpression.

Both copy number losses and gains occur within subtelomeric 9q34 region without common breakpoints. The microdeletions cause Kleefstra syndrome (KS), whose responsible gene is EHMT1. A 9q34 duplication syndrome (9q34 DS) had been reported in literature, but it has never been characterized by a detailed molecular analysis of the gene content and endpoints. To the best of our knowledge, we report on the first patient carrying the smallest 9q34.3 duplication containing EHMT1 as the only relevant gene. We compared him with 21 reported patients described here as carrying 9q34.3 duplications encompassing the entire gene and extending within ~ 3 Mb. By surveying the available clinical and molecular cytogenetic data, we were able to discover that similar neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) were shared by patient carriers of even very differently sized duplications. Moreover, some facial features of the 9q34 DS were more represented than those of KS. However, an accurate in silico analysis of the genes mapped in all the duplications allowed us to support EHMT1 as being sufficient to cause a NDD phenotype. Wider patient cohorts are needed to ascertain whether the rearrangements have full causative role or simply confer the susceptibility to NDDs and possibly to identify the cognitive and behavioral profile associated with the increased dosage of EHMT1.

Prospective chromosome analysis of 3429 amniocentesis samples in China using copy number variation sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing is emerging as a viable alternative to chromosome microarray analysis for the diagnosis of chromosome disease syndromes. One next-generation sequencing methodology, copy number variation sequencing, has been shown to deliver high reliability, accuracy, and reproducibility for detection of fetal copy number variations in prenatal samples. However, its clinical utility as a first-tier diagnostic method has yet to be demonstrated in a large cohort of pregnant women referred for fetal chromosome testing. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate copy number variation sequencing as a first-tier diagnostic method for detection of fetal chromosome anomalies in a general population of pregnant women with high-risk prenatal indications. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective analysis of 3429 pregnant women referred for amniocentesis and fetal chromosome testing for different risk indications, including advanced maternal age, high-risk maternal serum screening, and positivity for an ultrasound soft marker. Amniocentesis was performed by standard procedures. Amniocyte DNA was analyzed by copy number variation sequencing with a chromosome resolution of 0.1 Mb. Fetal chromosome anomalies including whole chromosome aneuploidy and segmental imbalances were independently confirmed by gold standard cytogenetic and molecular methods and their pathogenicity determined following guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics for sequence variants. RESULTS: Clear interpretable copy number variation sequencing results were obtained for all 3429 amniocentesis samples. Copy number variation sequencing identified 3293 samples (96%) with a normal molecular karyotype and 136 samples (4%) with an altered molecular karyotype. A total of 146 fetal chromosome anomalies were detected, comprising 46 whole chromosome aneuploidies (pathogenic), 29 submicroscopic microdeletions/microduplications with known or suspected associations with chromosome disease syndromes (pathogenic), 22 other microdeletions/microduplications (likely pathogenic), and 49 variants of uncertain significance. Overall, the cumulative frequency of pathogenic/likely pathogenic and variants of uncertain significance chromosome anomalies in the patient cohort was 2.83% and 1.43%, respectively. In the 3 high-risk advanced maternal age, high-risk maternal serum screening, and ultrasound soft marker groups, the most common whole chromosome aneuploidy detected was trisomy 21, followed by sex chromosome aneuploidies, trisomy 18, and trisomy 13. Across all clinical indications, there was a similar incidence of submicroscopic copy number variations, with approximately equal proportions of pathogenic/likely pathogenic and variants of uncertain significance copy number variations. If karyotyping had been used as an alternate cytogenetics detection method, copy number variation sequencing would have returned a 1% higher yield of pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variations. CONCLUSION: In a large prospective clinical study, copy number variation sequencing delivered high reliability and accuracy for identifying clinically significant fetal anomalies in prenatal samples. Based on key performance criteria, copy number variation sequencing appears to be a well-suited methodology for first-tier diagnosis of pregnant women in the general population at risk of having a suspected fetal chromosome abnormality.

Whole exome sequencing of families with 1q21.1 microdeletion or microduplication.

Recurrent microduplications/microdeletions of 1q21.1 are characterized by variable phenotypes ranging from normal development to developmental delay (DD) and congenital anomalies. Their interpretation is challenging especially in families with affected and unaffected carriers. We used whole exome sequencing (WES) to look for sequence variants in two male probands with inherited 1q21.1 CNVs that could explain their more severe phenotypes. One proband had a 1q21.1 deletion transmitted from maternal grandmother, while the other had a paternal duplication. We found mutations in five genes (SMPD1, WNK3, NOS1, ATF6, and EFHC1) that could contribute to the more severe phenotype in the probands in comparison to their mildly affected or unaffected 1q21.1 CNV carrying relatives. Interestingly, all genes have roles in stress responses (oxidative/Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER)/osmotic). One of the variants was in an X-linked gene WNK3 and segregated with the developmental features and X inactivation pattern in the family with 1q21.1 deletion transmitted from maternal grandmother. In silico analysis of all rare deleterious variants in both probands identified enrichment in nervous system diseases, metabolic pathways, protein processing in the ER and protein export. Our studies suggest that rare deleterious variants outside of the 1q21.1 CNV, individually or as a pool, could contribute to phenotypic variability in carriers of this CNV. Rare deleterious variants in stress response genes are of interest and raise the possibility of susceptibility of carriers to variable environmental influences. Next generation sequencing of additional familial cases with 1q21.1 CNV could further help determine the possible causes of phenotypic variability in carriers of this CNV.

Cytogenomic Evaluation of Children with Congenital Anomalies: Critical Implications for Diagnostic Testing and Genetic Counseling.

Identification of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations, as a cause of structural malformations, is currently performed by MLPA (multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification) or array CGH (array comparative genomic hybridization) techniques. The aim of this study was the evaluation of diagnostic usefulness of MLPA and array CGH in patients with congenital malformations or abnormalities (at least one major or minor birth defect, including dysmorphism) with or without intellectual disability or developmental delay and the optimization of genetic counseling in the context of the results obtained. The MLPA and array CGH were performed in 91 patients diagnosed with developmental disorders and major or minor congenital anomalies. A total of 49 MLPA tests toward common microdeletion syndromes, 42 MLPA tests for subtelomeric regions of chromosomes, two tests for common aberrations in autism, and five array CGH tests were performed. Eight (9 %) patients were diagnosed with microdeletion MLPA, four (4 %) patients with subtelomeric MLPA, one (1 %) patient with autism MLPA. Further three (3 %) individuals had rearrangements diagnosed by array CGH. Altogether, chromosomal microaberrations were found in 16 patients (17 %). All the MLPA-detected rearrangements were found to be pathogenic, but none detected with array CGH could unequivocally be interpreted as pathogenic. In patients with congenital anomalies, the application of MLPA and array CGH techniques is efficient in detecting syndromic and unique microrearrangements. Consistent pre-MLPA test phenotyping leads to better post-test genetic counseling. Incomplete penetrance and unknown inheritance of detected variants are major issues in clinical interpretation of array CGH data.

Customized high resolution CGH-array for clinical diagnosis reveals additional genomic imbalances in previous well-defined pathological samples.

High-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is a powerful molecular cytogenetic tool that is being adopted for diagnostic evaluation of genomic imbalances and study disease mechanisms and pathogenesis. We report on the design and use, of a custom whole-genome oligonucleotide-based array (called KaryoArray®v3.0; Agilent-based 8 × 60 K) for diagnostic setting, which was able to detect new and unexpected rearrangements in 11/63 (~17.5%) of previous known pathological cases associated with known genetic disorders, and in the second step it identified at least one causal genomic imbalance responsible of the phenotype in ~20% of patients with psychomotor development delay and/or intellectual disability. To validate the array, first; we blindly tested 120 samples; 63 genomic imbalances that had previously been detected by karyotyping, FISH and/or MLPA, and 57 sex-matched control samples from healthy individuals; secondly a prospective study of 540 patients with intellectual disabilities, autism spectrum disorder and multiple congenital anomalies were evaluated to confirm the utility of the tool. These data indicate that implementation of array technologies as the first-tier test may reveal that additional genomic imbalances could co-exist in patients with trisomies and classical del/dup syndromes, suggesting that aCGH may also be indicated in these individuals, at least when phenotype does not match completely with genotype.

Prenatal phenotypes and pregnancy outcomes of fetuses with recurrent 1q21.1 microdeletions and microduplications.

Objective: Chromosomal 1q21.1 deletions and duplications are genomic disorders that are usually diagnosed postnatally. However, the genotype-phenotype correlations of 1q21.1 copy number variants (CNVs) during the prenatal period are still not clear. This study aimed to provide a systematic summary of prenatal phenotypes for such genomic disorders. Methods: In total, 26 prenatal amniotic fluid samples diagnosed with 1q21.1 microdeletions/microduplications were obtained from pregnant women who opted for invasive prenatal testing. Karyotypic analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) were performed for all cases simultaneously. The pregnancy outcomes and health conditions after birth in all cases were followed up. Meanwhile, prenatal cases with 1q21.1 microdeletions or microduplications in the literature were retrospectively collected. Results: In total, 11 pregnancies (11/8,252, 0.13%) with 1q21.1 microdeletions and 15 (15/8,252, 0.18%) with 1q21.1 microduplications were identified. Among these 1q21.1 CNVs, 4 cases covered the thrombocytopenia-absent radius (TAR) region, 16 cases covered the 1q21.1 recurrent microdeletion/microduplication region, and 6 cases covered all regions mentioned above. The prenatal abnormal ultrasound findings were recorded in four participants with 1q21.1 deletions and seven participants with 1q21.1 duplications. Finally, three cases with 1q21.1 deletions and five with 1q21.1 duplications terminated their pregnancies. Conclusion: In the prenatal setting, 1q21.1 microdeletions were associated with increased nuchal translucency (NT), anomalies of the urinary system, and cardiovascular abnormalities, while 1q21.1 microduplications were correlated with cardiovascular malformations, nasal bone dysplasia, and increased NT. In addition, cerebral ventriculomegaly might be correlated with 1q21.1 microduplications. Considering the variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance of 1q21.1 CNVs, long-term follow-up after birth should be carried out in these cases.

Modeling development of genitourinary birth defects to understand disruption due to changes in gene dosage.

Genitourinary development is a delicately orchestrated process that begins in the embryo. Once complete, the genitourinary system is a collection of functionally disparate organs spread throughout the abdominal and pelvic regions. These distinct organs are interconnected through an elaborate duct system which aggregates the organs' products to a common exit point. The complicated nature of the genitourinary system makes it highly susceptible to developmental disruptions that produce anomalies. In fact, genitourinary anomalies are among the most common class of human birth defects. Aside from congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT), for males, these birth defects can also occur in the penis (hypospadias) and testis (cryptorchism), which impact male fertility and male mental health. As genetic technology has advanced, it has become clear that a subset of cases of genitourinary birth defects are due to gene variation causing dosage changes in critical regulatory genes. Here we first review the parallels between human and mouse genitourinary development. We then demonstrate how translational research leverages mouse models of human gene variation cases to advance mechanistic understanding of causation in genitourinary birth defects. We close with a view to the future highlighting upcoming technologies that will provide a deeper understanding of gene variation affecting regulation of genitourinary development, which should ultimately advance treatment options for patients.

Prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling of a paternally inherited chromosome 15q11.2 microdeletion in a Chinese family.

BACKGROUND: Proximal region of chromosome 15 long arm is rich in duplicons that, define five breakpoints (BP) for 15q rearrangements. 15q11.2 microdeletion has been previously associated with developmental delay, mental retardation, epilepsy, autism, schizophrenia and congenital heart defects. The literature on this microdeletion is extensive and confusing, which is a challenge for genetic counselling. CASE PRESENTATION: We have performed prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling of a paternally inherited 15q11.2 microdeletion. In this family, father with normal phenotype and fetus with abnormal phenotype have the same microdeletion. CONCLUSION: Chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications are difficult to detect by conventional cytogenetics, combination of prenatal ultrasound, karyotype analysis, CMA and genetic counseling is helpful for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal microdeletions/microduplications.

Clinical and genetic study of three families with 15q11q13 duplications.

OBJECTIVE: To report three families with chromosome 15q11q13 duplications. CASE REPORT: We report the prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling of three 15q11q13 duplications. CONCLUSION: Chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications are difficult to be detected by conventional cytogenetics. With molecular genetic techniques including array-based methods, the number of reported cases has rapidly increased. An integration of prenatal ultrasound, NIPT, karyotype analysis, CMA and genetic counseling is helpful for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal microdeletions/microduplications.

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic analyses of a paternal inherited deletion of 1q23.3 encompassing PBX1 gene.

BACKGROUND: Patients with deletions involving the long arm of chromosome 1 are rare. The PBX1 gene is located on chromosome 1q23.3. PBX1 encodes a transcription factor which promotes protein-protein interaction and plays a crucial role in several developmental processes. PBX1 haploinsufficiency had been reported to lead syndromic congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) in humans. CASE PRESENTATION: In this research, a 24-year-old woman (gravida 1, para 0) underwent amniocentesis at 22 weeks' gestation because of a horseshoe kidney of the fetus on prenatal ultrasound. RESULTS: Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) from this family revealed a 1.14 Mb paternal inherited deletion on chromosome 1q23.3, spanning from position 163,620,000 to 164,760,000 (hg19). Trio whole-exome sequencing (WES) showed heterozygous deletions in exons 1-2 of the PBX1 in fetal and paternal samples. At the 3-year follow-up, the baby did not have an abnormal phenotype except a horseshoe kidney. CONCLUSION: We provide a detailed description of the phenotype in a family with paternal inherited deletion of 1q23.3 encompassing exons 1-2 of the PBX1 gene. Combination of karyotype analysis, CMA, WES, prenatal ultrasound and genetic counseling is helpful for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal microdeletions/microduplications.

Prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling of an inherited unbalanced chromosome abnormalities in a Chinese family.

BACKGROUND: Unbalanced chromosome abnormalities (UBCA) are either gains or losses or large genomic regions, but the affected person is not or only minimally clinically affected. Copy number variants (CNVs) are an important source of normal and pathogenic genome variations. CNVs and UBCA identified in prenatal cases need careful considerations and correct interpretation if those are harmless or harmful variants from the norm. CASE PRESENTATION: A 25-year-old, gravida 1, para 0, woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because the noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results revealed a 6.8 Mb duplication from 2q11.1 to 2q11.2. Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was performed on uncultured amniocytes. GTG-banding karyotype analysis on cultured amniocytes was performed. RESULTS: Chromosomal GTG-banding of the cultured amniocytes revealed a karyotype of 46,XX. CMA detected a 6.8-Mb chromosomal duplication in the region of 2q11.1q11.2 (arr[GRCh37] 2q11.1q11.2(95,327,873_102,088,148)x3). CONCLUSION: Chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications are difficult to detect by conventional cytogenetics, combination of prenatal ultrasound, karyotype analysis, NIPT, CMA and genetic counseling is helpful for the prenatal diagnosis of UBCA and chromosomal microdeletions/microduplications.

Prenatal Diagnosis by Chromosome Microarray Analysis, An Indian Experience.

BACKGROUND: Karyotyping has been the gold standard for prenatal chromosome analysis. The resolution should be higher by chromosome microarray analysis (CMA). The challenge lies in recognizing benign and pathogenic or clinically significant copy number variations (pCNV) and variations of unknown significance (VOUS). The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of CMA, to stratify the CMA results in various prenatal referral groups and to accumulate Indian data of pCNVs and VOUS for further interpretation to assist defined genetic counseling. METHODS: Karyotyping and CMA were performed on consecutive referrals of 370 prenatal samples of amniotic fluid (n = 274) and chorionic villi (n = 96) from Indian pregnant women with high maternal age (n = 23), biochemical screen positive (n = 61), previous child abnormal (n = 59), abnormal fetal ultrasound (n = 205) and heterozygous parents (n = 22). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The overall diagnostic yield of abnormal results was 5.40% by karyotyping and 9.18% by CMA. The highest percentage of pCNVs were found in the group with abnormal fetal ultrasound (5.40%) as compared to other groups, such as women with high maternal age (0.81%), biochemical screen positive (0.54%), previous abnormal offspring (0.81%) or heterozygous parents group (1.62%). Therefore, all women with abnormal fetal ultrasound must undergo CMA test for genotype-phenotype correlation. CMA detects known and rare deletion/duplication syndromes and characterizes marker chromosomes. Accumulation of CNV data will form an Indian Repository and also help to resolve the uncertainty of VOUS. Pretest and posttest genetic counseling is essential to convey benefits and limitations of CMA and help the patients to take informed decisions.

17p13.3 Microduplication Syndrome: Further Delineating the Clinical Spectrum.

17p13.3 microduplication syndrome has been associated with a clinical spectrum of phenotypes, and depending on the genes involved in the microduplication, it is categorized into two classes (Class I and Class II). We herein, describe two patients diagnosed with Class I 17p13.3 microduplication by BACs-on-Beads (BoBs) assay and further confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Our patients (Patient 1: 4-year-old male; Patient 2: 2-year-old male) presented with developmental delay, intellectual disability, and dysmorphic facial features. When compared with the literature, our patients manifested distinctive features (Patient 1: primary hypothyroidism; Patient 2: bilateral cryptorchidism) that were not previously described in the duplication 17p13.3 spectrum.

Prenatal diagnosis of BACs-on-Beads assay in 1520 cases from Fujian Province, China.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the application of BACs-on-Beads (BoBs™) assay for rapid detection of chromosomal abnormalities for prenatal diagnosis (PND). METHODS: A total of 1520 samples, including seven chorionic villi biopsy samples, 1328 amniotic fluid samples, and 185 umbilical cord samples from pregnant women were collected to detect the chromosomal abnormalities using BoBs™ assay and karyotyping. Furthermore, abnormal specimens were verified by chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). RESULTS: The results demonstrated that the success rate of karyotyping and BoBs™ assay in PND was 98.09% and 100%, respectively. BoBs™ assay was concordant with karyotyping for Trisomy 21, Trisomy 18, and Trisomy 13, sex chromosomal aneuploidy, Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome, and mosaicism. BoBs™ assay also detected Smith-Magenis syndrome, Williams-Beuren syndrome, DiGeorge syndrome, Miller-Dieker syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, Xp22.31 microdeletions, 22q11.2, and 17p11.2 microduplications. However, karyotyping failed to show these chromosomal abnormalities. A case of 8q21.2q23.3 duplication which was found by karyotyping was not detected by BoBs™ assay. Furthermore, all these chromosomal abnormalities were consistent with CMA and FISH verifications. According to the reports, we estimated that the detection rates of karyotyping, BoBs™, and CMA in the present study were 4.28%, 4.93%, and 5%, respectively, which is consistent with the results of a previous study. The respective costs for the three methods were about $135-145, $270-290, and $540-580. CONCLUSION: BoBs™ assay is considered a reliable, rapid test for use in PND. A variety of comprehensive technological applications can complement each other in PND, in order to maximize the diagnosis rate and reduce the occurrence of birth defects.

22q11.2 Microduplications: Two Clinical Reports Compared with Similar Cases from the Literature.

We present two male subjects (6 and 14 years old) with mild dysmorphism, intellectual disability, and/or autism spectrum disorder with chromosome 22q11.2 microduplications of different sizes. We then compared the clinical and genetic findings with similar cases from the literature sharing the same 22q11.2 duplications. These rare duplications in our subjects were identified by high-resolution chromosomal microarray analysis and flanked by low copy repeats in the 22q11.2 region, specifically LCR22A, LCR22B, and LCR22D. The typical 22q11.2 defect generally involves a deletion at breakpoints LCR22A and LCR22D causing DiGeorge or velo-cardio-facial syndrome and not duplications of varying sizes as seen in our male subjects.

Prenatal Diagnosis of Microdeletions or Microduplications in the Proximal, Central, and Distal Regions of Chromosome 22q11.2: Ultrasound Findings and Pregnancy Outcome.

Several recurrent microdeletions and microduplications in the proximal, central, and distal regions of chromosomal 22q11.2 have been identified. However, due to a limited number of patients reported in the literature, highly variable clinical phenotypes, and incomplete penetrance, the pathogenicity of some microdeletions/microduplications in 22q11.2 central and distal regions is unclear. Hence, the genetic counseling and subsequent pregnancy decision are extremely challenging, especially when they are found in structurally normal fetuses. Here, we reported 27 consecutive cases diagnosed prenatally with 22q11.2 microdeletions or microduplications by chromosomal microarray analysis in our center. The prenatal ultrasound features, inheritance of the microdeletions/microduplications, and their effects on the pregnancy outcome were studied. We found that fetuses with 22q11.2 microdeletions were more likely to present with structure defects in the ultrasound, as compared with fetuses with 22q11.2 microduplications. Both the prenatal ultrasound findings and the inheritance of the microdeletions/microduplications affected the parent's decision of pregnancy. Those with structure defects in prenatal ultrasound or occurred de novo often resulted in termination of the pregnancy, whereas those with normal ultrasound and inherited from healthy parent were likely to continue the pregnancy and led to normal birth. Our study emphasized that proximal, central, and distal 22q11.2 deletions or duplications were different from each other, although some common features were shared among them. More studies are warranted to demonstrate the underlying mechanisms of different clinical features of these recurrent copy-number variations, thereby to provide more information for genetic counseling of 22q11.2 microdeletions and microduplications when they are detected prenatally.

A Retrospective Analysis of 10-Year Data Assessed the Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficacy of Cytogenomic Abnormalities in Current Prenatal and Pediatric Settings.

Background: Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses have been used in a clinical cytogenetic laboratory. A systematic analysis on diagnostic findings of cytogenomic abnormalities in current prenatal and pediatric settings provides approaches for future improvement. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on abnormal findings by aCGH, karyotyping, and FISH from 3,608 prenatal cases and 4,509 pediatric cases during 2008-2017. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by comparing the abnormality detection rate (ADR) and the relative frequency (RF) of different types of cytogenomic abnormalities between prenatal and pediatric cases. A linear regression correlation between known prevalence and ADR of genomic disorders was used to extrapolate the prevalence of other genomic disorders. The diagnostic efficacy was estimated as percentage of detected abnormal cases by expected abnormal cases from served population. Results: The composite ADR for numerical chromosome abnormalities, structural chromosome abnormalities, recurrent genomic disorders, and sporadic pathogenic copy number variants (pCNVs) in prenatal cases were 13.03%, 1.77%, 1.69%, and 0.9%, respectively, and were 5.13%, 2.84%, 7.08%, and 2.69% in pediatric cases, respectively. The chromosomal abnormalities detected in prenatal cases (14.80%) were significantly higher than that of pediatric cases (7.97%) (p < 0.05), while the pCNVs detected in prenatal cases (2.59%) were significantly lower than that of pediatric cases (9.77%) (p < 0.05). The prevalence of recurrent genomic disorders and total pCNVs was estimated to be 1/396 and 1/291, respectively. Approximately, 29% and 35% of cytogenomic abnormalities expected from the population served were detected in current prenatal and pediatric diagnostic practice, respectively. Conclusion: For chromosomal abnormalities, effective detection of Down syndrome (DS) and Turner syndrome (TS) and under detection of sex chromosome numerical abnormalities in both prenatal and pediatric cases were noted. For pCNVs, under detection of pCNVs in prenatal cases and effective detection of DiGeorge syndrome (DGS) and variable efficacy in detecting other pCNVs in pediatric cases were noted. Extend aCGH analysis to more prenatal cases with fetal ultrasonographic anomalies, enhanced non-invasive prenatal (NIPT) testing screening for syndromic genomic disorders, and better clinical indications for pCNVs are approaches that could improve diagnostic yield of cytogenomic abnormalities.

Two maternal duplications involving the CDKN1C gene are associated with contrasting growth phenotypes.

BACKGROUND: The overgrowth-associated Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) and the undergrowth-associated Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS) are characterized by heterogeneous molecular defects affecting a large imprinted gene cluster at chromosome 11p15.5-p15.4. While maternal and paternal duplications of the entire cluster consistently result in SRS and BWS, respectively, the phenotypes associated with smaller duplications are difficult to predict due to the complexity of imprinting regulation. Here, we describe two cases with novel inherited partial duplications of the centromeric domain on chromosome 11p15 associated with contrasting growth phenotypes. FINDINGS: In a male patient affected by intrauterine growth restriction and postnatal short stature, we identified an in cis maternally inherited duplication of 0.88 Mb including the CDKN1C gene that was significantly up-regulated. The duplication did not include the long non-coding RNA KCNQ1OT1 nor the imprinting control region of the centromeric domain (KCNQ1OT1:TSS-DMR or ICR2) in which methylation was normal. In the mother, also referring a growth restriction phenotype in her infancy, the duplication was de novo and present on her paternal chromosome. A different in cis maternal duplication, 1.13 Mb long and including the abovementioned duplication, was observed in a child affected by Tetralogy of Fallot but with normal growth. In this case, the rearrangement also included most of the KCNQ1OT1 gene and resulted in ICR2 loss of methylation (LOM). In this second family, the mother carried the duplication on her paternal chromosome and showed a normal growth phenotype as well. CONCLUSIONS: We report two novel in cis microduplications encompassing part of the centromeric domain of the 11p15.5-p15.4 imprinted gene cluster and both including the growth inhibitor CDKN1C gene. Likely, as a consequence of the differential involvement of the regulatory KCNQ1OT1 RNA and ICR2, the smaller duplication is associated with growth restriction on both maternal and paternal transmissions, while the larger duplication, although it includes the smaller one, does not result in any growth anomaly. Our study provides further insights into the phenotypes associated with imprinted gene alterations and highlights the importance of carefully evaluating the affected genes and regulatory elements for accurate genetic counselling of the 11p15 chromosomal rearrangements.