Effect of dorsoplantar miniscrew fixation of the second metatarsal base fracture on residual diastases in acute lisfranc fracture-dislocation.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinico-radiographic outcomes between two techniques for acute Lisfranc fracture-dislocation with a large, displaced second metatarsal base plantar fracture: isolated Lisfranc screw fixation versus Lisfranc joint fixation with dorsoplantar miniscrew fixation of the second metatarsal base. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the clinico-radiographic outcome between patients who underwent isolated Lisfranc screw fixation (Group 1, 26 patients) and those who underwent Lisfranc joint fixation with dorsoplantar miniscrew fixation of the second metatarsal base (Group 2, 23 patients). The main outcome measurements were the postoperative distance between the medial cuneiform and second metatarsal base on standing anteroposterior foot radiographs, known as the C1-M2 distance. Residual diastasis was defined as C1-M2 distance ≥ 2 mm on the affected side compared with that on the contralateral side. We also assessed the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)-activities of daily living (ADL) and sports subscale scores at three, six and ≥ 18 months postoperatively. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, the mean C1-M2 distance on the affected side compared with that on the contralateral side was significantly greater in Group 1 than in Group 2 (3.9 versus 0.7 mm, P = 0.027). Furthermore, Group 1 showed a higher incidence of residual diastases at the final follow-up (69.2%) than the Group 2 (13.0%, P < 0.001). The FAAM-ADL scores at the final follow-up did not differ significantly between the groups (P = 0.518), but the FAAM Sports score was significantly higher in Group 2 than in Group 1 (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative C1-M2 distance was better maintained with Lisfranc joint fixation with dorsoplantar miniscrew fixation of the second metatarsal base than with isolated Lisfranc screw fixation. We recommend that surgeons exercise caution when dealing with a second metatarsal plantar fracture and consider performing secure fixation using the dorsoplantar miniscrew technique for improved clinical outcomes.

Mid-term Incidence of Tarsometatarsal Joint Arthrodesis Following Open Reduction With Internal Fixation (ORIF) of Lisfranc Injuries.

Open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) of Lisfranc injuries are associated with an increased risk for secondary surgery including hardware removal and salvage arthrodesis. In the current literature, rates of salvage arthrodesis vary due to small sample sizes and a low incidence of Lisfranc injuries. There is little evidence to identify specific surgical and patient-related variables that may result in later arthrodesis. The purpose of this study is to determine the rate of tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis following Lisfranc ORIF in a relatively large sample size. This retrospective review included patients who underwent ORIF for a Lisfranc injury between January 2007 and December 2012. A total of 146 patients met our criteria. Trans-articular fixation was used in 109 (74.6%) patients, 33 (22.6%) received percutaneous fixation and 4 (2.7%) extraarticular fixation. Five out of 120 (4.2%) patients required a salvage arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis that had a follow-up greater than 5 y but up to 10 y. The mean age of patients who underwent arthrodesis after ORIF was 24.5 ± 11.95 (16-48) y compared to 40.9 ± 15.8 (16-85) y. Patients who required an arthrodesis also had earlier hardware removal than patients who did not have an arthrodesis, 71.2 ± 28.3 (38-100) days and 131.4 ±101.2 (37-606) days, respectively. Patients who required salvage arthrodesis tended to be younger and hardware was removed earlier compared to those patients who did not require an arthrodesis. Four of the 5 patients who underwent a secondary arthrodesis had a loss of correction after hardware removal.

Surgical controversies and current concepts in Lisfranc injuries.

INTRODUCTION: Lisfranc injuries, not as rare as previously reported, range from ligamentous to complex fracture-dislocations. Anatomical studies have identified a complex of discrete structures, and defined the anatomical characteristics of the Lisfranc joint. SOURCES OF DATA: A narrative evidence-based review encompassed and analyzed published systematic reviews. Outcomes included clinical and surgical decision-making, including clinical-presentation, diagnosis, pathological-assessment, surgical-management techniques and indications, post-surgical care and comparative outcomes. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Better understanding of the Lisfranc complex anatomy aids surgical treatment and tactics. Prognosis is related to injury severity, estimated by the number of foot columns affected. Surgical outcome is determined by anatomical reduction for most fixation and fusion techniques. Appropriate treatment allows return to sport, improving outcome scores. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Identification of Lisfranc injuries may be improved by imaging modalities such as weight-bearing computer tomography. Recent evidence supports dorsal plate fixation as a result of better quality of reduction. In complex injuries, the use of combined techniques such as trans-articular screw and plate fixation has been associated with poorer outcomes, and fusion may instead offer greater benefits. GROWING POINTS: Open reduction is mandatory if closed reduction fails, highlighting the importance of understanding surgical anatomy. If anatomical reduction is achieved, acute arthrodesis is a safe alternative to open reduction internal fixation in selected patients, as demonstrated by comparable outcomes in subgroup analysis. AREAS FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: The current controversies in surgical treatment remain around techniques and outcomes, as randomized controlled trials are infrequent.

Factors influencing postoperative residual diastasis after the operative treatment of acute Lisfranc fracture dislocation.

INTRODUCTION: Clinically, surgeons may frequently encounter residual diastasis between the medial cuneiform and 2nd metatarsal base after the operative treatment of acute Lisfranc fracture dislocations. The purpose of this study was to identify factors influencing postoperative residual diastasis. We specifically focused on the preoperative fracture pattern using 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiographic and clinical findings of 66 patients who underwent operative treatment for acute Lisfranc fracture dislocation were reviewed. Patients were grouped according to residual diastasis evaluated by weight-bearing anteroposterior radiograph of the foot at the final follow-up. Residual diastasis was defined as distance between the medial cuneiform and 2nd metatarsal base greater than the distance on the contralateral side by 2 mm or more. Demographic parameters and fracture patterns based on preoperative foot 3D-CT were compared. A paired t test was used to compare continuous numeric parameters, while a Chi-square test was used for the proportional parameters. Statistical significance was set at P value less than 0.05 for all analyses. RESULTS: The mean age at operation, sex, body mass index, and the rate of underlying diabetes were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05 each). Preoperative foot 3D-CT evaluation showed that the rate of large (> 25% of 2nd tarsometatarsal joint involvement), displaced (> 2 mm) fracture fragments on the plantar side of the 2nd metatarsal base was more pronounced in the group with residual diastasis (P = 0.001), while medial wall avulsion of the 2nd metatarsal base was more frequent in the group without residual diastasis (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: While treating acute Lisfranc injuries, surgeons should be aware of the presence of a 2nd metatarsal base plantar fracture. A dorsoplantar inter-fragmentary fixation can be considered if the fragment is large and displaced.

Outcome after nonoperative treatment of stable Lisfranc injuries. A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome after nondisplaced and stable Lisfranc injuries. METHODS: 26 patients with injuries to the Lisfranc joint complex detected on CT scans, but without displacement were tested to be stable using a fluoroscopic stress test. The patients were immobilized in a non-weightbearing short leg cast for 6 weeks. The final follow-up was 55 (IQR 53-60) months after injury. RESULTS: All the Lisfranc injuries were confirmed to be stable on follow-up weightbearing radiographs at a minimum of 3 months after injury. Median American Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score at 1-year follow-up was 89 (IQR 84-97) and at final follow-up 100 (IQR 90-100); The AOFAS score continued to improve after 1-year (P=.005). The median visual analog scale (VAS) for pain was 0 (IQR 0-0) at the final follow-up. One patient had radiological signs of osteoarthritis at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Stable Lisfranc injuries treated nonoperatively had an excellent outcome in this study with a median follow-up of 55 months. The AOFAS score continued to improve after 1 year.

Lisfranc injuries: Incidence, mechanisms of injury and predictors of instability.

BACKGROUND: In Lisfranc injuries the stability of the tarsometatarsal joints guides the treatment of the injury. Determining the stability, especially in the subtle Lisfranc injuries, can be challenging. The purpose of this study was to identify incidence, mechanisms of injury and predictors for instability in Lisfranc injuries. METHODS: Eighty-four Lisfranc injuries presenting at Oslo University Hospital between September 2014 and August 2015 were included. The diagnosis was based on radiologically verified injuries to the tarsometatarsal joints. Associations between radiographic findings and stability were examined. RESULTS: The incidence of Lisfranc injuries was 14/100,000 person-years, and only 31% were high-energy injuries. The incidence of unstable injuries was 6/100,000 person-years, and these were more common in women than men (P = 0.016). Intraarticular fractures in the two lateral tarsometatarsal joints increased the risk of instability (P = 0.007). The height of the second tarsometatarsal joint was less in the unstable injuries than in the stable injuries (P = 0.036). CONCLUSION: The incidence of Lisfranc injuries in the present study is higher than previously published. The most common mechanism of injury is low-energy trauma. Intraarticular fractures in the two lateral tarsometatarsal joints, female gender and shorter second tarsometatarsal joint height increase the risk of an unstable injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, cross-sectional study.

[Therapy of a gunshot fracture to the midfoot]. / Therapie einer Schussfraktur am Mittelfußknochen.

We report on a soldier with a gunshot wound to the midfoot. The diaphysis of MT 5 was pounded to pieces and there was a fracture in the diaphysis of MT 4. After debridement and fixation of MT 4 and MT 5 to MT 2 and 3 via two Kirschner wires we conducted a second look procedure with reconstruction of MT 5 via a piece of iliac crest. After eight weeks of unloading and removal of the last wire we started to put successively heavier weight on the foot.

The Management of Navicular Dislocation and Multifocal Fractures Following a Fall.

Midfoot injuries, encompassing navicular dislocations and fractures of the navicular bone, present unique challenges in trauma care. We report the case of a 27-year-old male who suffered a fall down a flight of stairs, resulting in navicular dislocation and multifocal fractures of the midfoot. The patient underwent a comprehensive management plan, including admission, closed reduction, and internal fixation with parallel K-wires. Radiological evaluations confirmed the extent of the injuries. Postoperatively, the patient received tailored care, incorporating pain management, antibiotics, and thromboprophylaxis. The successful outcome underscores the importance of a structured approach in addressing midfoot injuries, contributing to the existing literature on optimal management strategies. This case report serves as a valuable addition to the growing body of knowledge guiding clinicians in the effective treatment of navicular dislocations and navicular fractures.

An unusual midfoot injury pattern: Navicular-cuneiform and calcaneal-cuboid fracture-dislocation.

Fracture-dislocations of the midfoot are relatively rare injuries. We present a case of a 20-year-old man presenting with navicular-cuneiform and calcaneal-cuboid fracture-dislocation of his right foot due to a crush injury during work. The patient's injury was treated by open reduction internal fixation.

Pediatric and adolescent Lisfranc injuries - Presentation, treatment and outcomes.

PURPOSE: Lisfranc fracture dislocations are rare injuries and even more so in the pediatric population. The main purpose of our study is to present a descriptive analysis of Lisfranc injuries in pediatric patients to add to the current sparse literature on this topic. In addition, our secondary outcome was to analyze any differences in patients treated conservatively versus operatively, and those with isolated Lisfranc injuries versus those with associated foot injuries. METHODS: Charts of patients with Lisfranc injury treated at a tertiary pediatric hospital from January 2010 to July 2019 were reviewed to analyze their demographics, injury characteristics, management details and rehabilitation protocol. Functional outcome was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale of Pain (VAS) and the Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire for Children (OxAFQ-C). RESULTS: 30 patients/cases were included with mean age of 13.6 years and mean follow up of 36 weeks. 20% of the cases were missed on initial presentation. 19 cases were managed operatively while 11 were managed conservatively. The average OxAFQ-C and VAS pain scores were 83% and 1.3, respectively at mean follow-up of 36 weeks. The functional outcomes between conservative and operative cases or between those with isolated Lisfranc injuries and those with associated foot injuries were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Lisfranc injury in pediatrics can be easily missed. High index of suspicion, a thorough clinical examination and the use of advanced imaging is warranted. Various modalities like K-wires, screws and suture-buttons can be used for fixation. Early to mid-term functional outcomes are satisfactory provided that adequate reduction is obtained.

A case report with review of literature of a rare variant of midfoot dislocations (mid-Chopart dislocation): Combined naviculo-cuneiform and calcaneo-cuboid dislocation.

Closed midfoot and Chopart dislocations are uncommon injuries. Moreover, a combination of these dislocations is extremely rare. A 30-year-old male presented to our emergency department with mid-Chopart dislocation (combined naviculo-cuneiform and calcaneo-cuboid dislocation). Adequate open reduction with dual approach (dorsomedial and dorsolateral) and fixation with K-wires were achieved. Although the patient had satisfactory functional outcome postoperatively, he developed midfoot arthritis 12 months later. This type of dislocation is not yet classified, with only few cases reported in the literature. LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE: 4.

Screw in Lisfranc Ligament.

Background. Injury to the Lisfranc interosseous ligament is currently managed with a screw. However, this can potentially further disrupt the ligament. The objective of this study was to observe the proximity of the screw or disruption it can cause at the ligament attachment sites. Methods. Twenty-three feet were studied. A 40-mm, 4.0, partially threaded, cannulated screw was inserted from the base of the second metatarsal into the medial cuneiform. The relationship of the ligament attachment sites to the screw hole were measured. Results. The screw hole contacted at least 1 of the ligament attachment sites in 20 of the 23 feet. The screw hole fully penetrated it in 7 feet, partially disrupted it in 4 feet, and had less than or equal to 1 mm of contact in 9 feet. There was no contact with either of the attachment sites in 3 feet, with an average distance of 1.5 mm separating them. Conclusion. Our results show the proximity of the ligament to the screw and the disruption that can result from its insertion. This is clinically relevant as some amount ligamentous disruption is likely to occur with insertion of the "Lisfranc screw," which may interfere with its healing process.Levels of Evidence: Level V: Expert opinion includes case reports and technique tips.

An unusual presentation of acute isolated spring ligament injury in an adolescent: A case report.

Spring ligament is an important stabilizing soft tissue structure on the plantar aspect of calcaneo-navicular joint. It is principal stabilizing structure to maintain the medial longitudinal arch during weight bearing. Attenuation of spring ligament along with tibialis posterior tendon deficiency usually results in adult acquired flat foot. However, cases of isolated injury to spring ligament are rare in the literature. A case of neglected spring ligament injury in a 15 years old girl with an unusual and dramatic presentation is described. Head of talus used to dislocate medially and plantarwards on every step of walking. This was treated successfully with talonavicular fusion. Level of clinical evidence: Level IV.

An Unusual Midfoot Dislocation Involving Naviculocuneiform and Calcaneocuboid Joint Following Low-Energy Injury: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Midfoot injuries involving naviculocuneiform and calcanealcuboid joints are very rare. These injuries result from high-energy crushing trauma and most often causes dislocation of the midfoot in plantar direction. CASE REPORT: A 30-year-old female sustained an injury to the left foot after a fall from a very low height. A radiograph of the left foot demonstrated naviculocuneiform joint and calcaneocuboid joint fracture-dislocation. This unusual pattern of injury required open reduction and internal fixation with K-wires after a failed attempt of closed reduction. K-wires were removed after 8 weeks. At 24 months follow-up, she achieved a complete range of movements of left foot and ankle without any complications. CONCLUSION: Injuries involving naviculocuneiform and the calcaneocuboid joint can occur following low-energy impact. Such complex injuries should be diagnosed and treated as early as possible. Initial open reduction and stable anatomical fixation are the keys to achieve a good functional outcome in such kind of injuries.

Combined open calcaneocuboid, naviculocuneiform and subtalar dislocation: A case report and literature review.

Open dislocations of the midfoot and subtalar joints are extremely rare injuries. Understanding the anatomy of these joints and the various injury patterns is imperative to obtain stable concentric reduction and provide good functional outcome. We present a report of a 26- year old male who was involved in a road traffic accident and sustained open dislocations of the calcaneocuboid, naviculocuneiform and subtalar joints. He initially underwent external fixation in view of the severe soft tissue injury. After improvement of the soft tissue condition, he underwent K-wiring of the calcaneocuboid joint, buttress plating of the talonaviculocuneiform joint, peroneal tendon reconstruction using hamstring allograft and defect coverage with a free anterolateral thigh flap. With appropriate rehabilitation protocols, patient recovered well and was allowed to weight bear as tolerated by 10 weeks. His wounds healed completely by 4 months. We report this case considering the rarity of the combined calcaneocuboid, naviculocuneiform and subtalar dislocations which were successfully managed.

Medial Swivel Peritalar Fracture Dislocation: A Case Report.

A medial swivel peritalar fracture-dislocation is a rare and disabling foot injury. The terminology describes a peritalar dislocation as the direction of peritalar foot displacement. Medial dislocation is the most frequent type. A rare variant involves talonavicular joint dislocation, subtalar joint fracture-dislocation, and calcaneocuboid fracture-dislocation. The clinical position of the foot resembles an equinovarus deformity. A computed tomography (CT) scan is necessary to obtain a diagnosis and formulate a surgical plan. A medial swivel peritalar fracture-dislocation is a challenging injury, and because there have been few reported cases in the literature, an optimal treatment protocol has not yet been established. We present a case of an unusual fracture-dislocation pattern of the hind and midfoot causing a complex talonavicular fracture-dislocation, subtalar fracture dislocation, and calcaneocuboid fracture-dislocation. The injury was successfully treated with open reduction and internal fixation.

Lisfranc injuries.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to discuss key anatomic and pathoanatomic factors, treatment principles, and patient outcomes of Lisfranc injuries. RECENT FINDINGS: Although open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) remains the current gold standard of treatment, ORIF with primary arthrodesis has become increasingly popular in recent years, both for pure ligamentous and for bony-ligamentous injuries. Return to activity and competitive sports as well as overall patient outcomes have been further defined, suggesting that most patients are able to return to near pre-injury level if properly diagnosed and appropriately treated. Considerable controversy remains as to the optimal method of treatment of Lisfranc injuries and may ultimately be defined by activity-specific or sport-specific criteria.

Lisfranc Injuries in the Athlete.

Lisfranc injuries to the tarsometatarsal complex of the midfoot have become increasingly recognized in the athletic population. Regardless of mechanism, any injury that results in instability in the midfoot requires operative stabilization to preserve function and enable return to sport. In this manuscript, the anatomy, etiology, prevalence, current treatment modalities, and clinical outcomes of patients who suffer Lisfranc injuries are reviewed, with a special focus on the unique characteristics surrounding such an injury in an athlete. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion.

Functional progression and return to sport criteria for a high school football player following surgery for a lisfranc injury.

UNLABELLED: Lisfranc injuries are a challenging diagnosis for the sports physical therapist because of the lack of data on how to rehabilitate them properly. To date, the available rehabilitation literature has focused on the mechanism of injury and the conservative management of this injury. Furthermore, there is a lack of consensus on the appropriate testing and return to play criteria for an athlete recovering from this perplexing injury. This case describes a high school athlete whose primary sport was football, but was injured during wrestling. He suffered a Lisfranc injury and subsequently underwent surgical fixation. The purpose of this case report is to focus on the exercise, functional progression, and return to sport criteria utilized after operative treatment of a Lisfranc ligament injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Lisfranc fracture-dislocation in a female soccer athlete.

Individuals with midfoot injuries may present to physical therapists in a variety of clinical settings. The ability of the physical therapy practitioner to optimally manage the care of such an individual may be dependent on understanding the diagnostic imaging that is indicated or has been been completed. Among the potentially most debilitating midfoot injuries are Lisfranc fracture-dislocations. This case outlines the use of conventional radiology, standard computerized tomography (CT), and three-dimensional CT for differential diagnosis of Lisfranc and associated midfoot injury in a 26 year-old female recreational athlete. Her subsequent surgical and post-surgical management is briefly discussed.Physical therapists evaluating patients with suspected midfoot injuries should be cognizant of the tendency for Lisfranc injuries to escape initial detection, possibly precipitating misdiagnosis or delay to diagnosis. Nonweight-bearing radiography may be insensitive to demonstrating the anatomical disruption of significant midfoot injuries. Weight-bearing radiographic views along with selective use of MRI and CT aid in proper identification of injury to the tarsometatarsal joints and optimal management of patients with these injuries.