Nerve blocks for occipital headaches: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Migraine surgeons have identified six "trigger sites" where cranial nerve compression may trigger a migraine. This study investigates the change in headache severity and frequency following nerve block of the occipital trigger site. This PRISMA-compliant systematic review of five databases searched from database inception through May 2020 is registered under the PROSPERO ID: CRD42020199369. Only randomized controlled trials utilizing injection treatments for headaches with pain or tenderness in the occipital scalp were included. Pain severity was scored from 0 to 10. Headache frequency was reported as days per week. Included were 12 RCTs treating 586 patients of mean ages ranging from 33.7 to 55.8 years. Meta-analyses of pain severity comparing nerve blocks to baseline showed statistically significant reductions of 2.88 points at 5 to 20 min, 3.74 points at 1 to 6 weeks, and 1.07 points at 12 to 24 weeks. Meta-analyses of pain severity of nerve blocks compared with treatment groups of neurolysis, pulsed radiofrequency, and botulinum toxin type A showed similar headache pain severity at 1 to 2 weeks, and inferior improvements compared with the treatment groups after 2 weeks. Meta-analyses of headache frequency showed statistically significant reductions at 1 to 6-week follow-ups as compared with baseline and at 1 to 6 weeks as compared with inactive control injections. The severity and frequency of occipital headaches are reduced following occipital nerve blocks. This improvement is used to predict the success of migraine surgery. Future research should investigate spinous process injections with longer follow-up.

Single midline incision approach for decompression of greater, lesser and third occipital nerves in migraine surgery.

BACKGROUND: The traditional approach for occipital migraine surgery encompasses three separate surgical incisions in the posterior neck to decompress the greater occipital nerves (GON), lesser occipital nerves (LON), and third occipital nerves (TON). Other incisions have been investigated, including singular transverse incisions. We sought to evaluate a single, vertical midline incision approach for decompression of all six occipital nerves. METHODS: Using 10 cadaveric hemi-sides (5 fresh cadaver head and necks). Anatomic landmarks and the location of the bilateral GON, LON, and TON were marked according to previous anatomic studies. A single, midline 9-cm incision was made, and lateral skin flaps were raised to decompress or avulse all six nerves. RESULTS: Through the midline incision, the GON and TON were identified at 3.5 and 6.2 cm, respectively, inferior to a line bisecting the external auditory canal (EAC) and 1.5 cm lateral to the midline. The LON was identified as 6-cm inferior and 6.5-cm medial to a line bisecting the EAC in the plane just above the investing layer of the deep cervical fascia until the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid was encountered. The LON had the greatest amount of variation but was identified lateral to the posterior border of the SCM. CONCLUSIONS: A single midline incision approach allows for successful identification and decompression of all six occipital nerves in migraine surgery.

Decompression endoscopic surgery for frontal secondary headache attributed to supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve entrapment: a comprehensive review.

In the last decade, a new surgical treatment modality was developed for frontal secondary headache, based on the assumption that the trigger of this pain entity is the entrapment of peripheral sensory nerves. The surgery entails a procedure, where an endoscopic approach is used to decompress the supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve branches, which are entrapped by the periosteum in the region of the corrugator supercilii muscle. Candidates for the surgery define their headache as moderate to severe persistent daily pressure or tension, localized in the frontal area, sometimes accompanied by symptoms of nausea and photophobia mimicking a primary headache-migraine. We created a step-by-step screening algorithm which is used to differentiate patients that have the highest chance for a successful surgical decompression. Up to now, published data regarding this type of surgery demonstrate long-lasting successful outcomes while adverse effects are minor. This article reviews and discusses from a surgeon's perspective decompression surgery for secondary headache attributed to supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve entrapment.

Interface Between Cosmetic and Migraine Surgery.

This article describes connections between migraine surgery and cosmetic surgery including technical overlap, benefits for patients, and why every plastic surgeon may consider screening cosmetic surgery patients for migraine headache (MH). Contemporary migraine surgery began by an observation made following forehead rejuvenation, and the connection has continued. The prevalence of MH among females in the USA is 26%, and females account for 91% of cosmetic surgery procedures and 81-91% of migraine surgery procedures, which suggests substantial overlap between both patient populations. At the same time, recent reports show an overall increase in cosmetic facial procedures. Surgical techniques between some of the most commonly performed facial surgeries and migraine surgery overlap, creating opportunity for consolidation. In particular, forehead lift, blepharoplasty, septo-rhinoplasty, and rhytidectomy can easily be part of the migraine surgery, depending on the migraine trigger sites. Patients could benefit from simultaneous improvement in MH symptoms and rejuvenation of the face. Simple tools such as the Migraine Headache Index could be used to screen cosmetic surgery patients for MH. Similarity between patient populations, demand for both facial and MH procedures, and technical overlap suggest great incentive for plastic surgeons to combine both. Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Is Migraine Surgery Ready for Prime Time? The Surgical Team's View.

BACKGROUND: Based on unsolicited reports by patients that their headaches had ceased or reduced following forehead rejuvenation, our team began stepwise and logical studies to investigate the efficacy of surgery as a potential preventive modality for selected patients with migraine headaches (MH). The purpose of this report is to summarize the pertinent studies demonstrating the efficacy of surgical decompression trigger sites of migraine trigger sites. METHODS: These studies included a retrospective, a prospective pilot, a prospective randomized study with a control arm, a prospective randomized study with sham surgery, and a 5-year follow-up. There were 3 reputable and respected neurologists who specialize in headaches, an expert biostatistician, 13 residents, and 10 medical students involved in these studies. RESULTS: In our retrospective study, of the 249 patients, 39 confirmed having MH prior to the surgery, and 31 (P < .0001) experienced either complete elimination or significant improvement (at least 50% reduction) of their MH. In our prospective pilot study, 21 of the 22 patients noted a significant improvement (P < .001). In our prospective randomized study, 82 of 89 (92%) observed at least 50% improvement in the frequency, intensity, and duration of MH (P < .00001). Sixty-one of 69 (88%) patients in this study who were followed for 5 years persisted to have significant improvement after 5 years (P < .0001). In our randomized study involving sham surgery, 21 of the 49 (83%) patients benefitted from the real surgery compared to 15 of 26 (56%) patients in the sham surgery group (P = .014). While 28 (57%) patients in the real surgery group observed complete elimination, only 1 patient in the sham surgery group reported elimination (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: This report discusses the facts surrounding the discovery of this surgery, demonstrates accuracy of our studies and effectiveness of the proposed surgeries and dispels some of the unfounded assertions trying to discredit the research that we have conducted over 14 years.

Migraine Trigger Site Surgery is All Placebo.

BACKGROUND: Over the last decade surgical treatments for migraine involving proposed trigger sites have been described and popularized by plastic surgeons in particular. Various related techniques aim to free up "trigger sites" by removal of small facial muscles or "decompressing" small facial nerves. DISCUSSION: The basis for migraine trigger site surgery is without merit. There is one positive placebo controlled study with many limitations. Natural history and placebo mechanisms explain the outcomes from migraine surgery. The American Headache Society recommends that the migraine surgery not be performed outside of a clinical trial. CONCLUSION: Migraine trigger site surgery should not be performed.

A critical evaluation of migraine trigger site deactivation surgery.

Migraine headache trigger site deactivation surgery is a term that encompasses 4 different surgical procedures that are performed based on headache onset location for the preventative treatment of migraine headaches. Multiple studies have demonstrated some efficacy of these procedures, but closer evaluation of the methodology of these studies reveals major flaws in study design. In this article, the author provides an overview of the procedures and presurgical screening tools, as well as a critical evaluation of 2 of the major studies that have been published. In addition, the author provides his opinion on future study designs that may help to better determine the potential efficacy of these experimental procedures and potential headache subtypes (contact point headache, supraorbital neuralgia, and occipital neuralgia) that may respond to peripheral decompression surgery.

Temporal aneurysms and migraine surgery.

The present study reports two cases of chronic migraines associated with superficial temporal artery aneurysms. The patients received aneurysm's ligation, with no other surgical maneuvers. In the six months following surgery, both patients were disease-free and did not experience any migraine attacks. Evidence-based medicine ranking: Level V.

Surgical treatment delay in patients with headache disorders and neuralgia correlates with poor postoperative outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Although nerve decompression surgery has proven to be effective in reducing symptoms in patients with head and neck neuralgia and headache disorders, it is currently not part of the treatment algorithms for headache disorders. Therefore, patients wait an average of 20 years from the onset of symptoms to surgery, resulting in high conservative treatment costs ($989,275.65 per patient) and patient morbidity. This study evaluated the clinical impact of treatment delays on surgical outcomes. METHODS: Overall, 282 patients who underwent nerve decompression surgery at Weill Cornell Medicine and Massachusetts General Hospital between September 2012 and January 2024 were enrolled. Information regarding demographics, onset of symptoms, and headache characteristics was collected using patient surveys. The treatment outcome was evaluated by the percentage of symptom reduction in terms of frequency, duration, and pain intensity. An area under the receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the optimal timepoint to undergo surgery. RESULTS: Postoperative symptom reduction and time between the onset of symptoms and surgery were negatively correlated (r = -0.22; p < 0.001). The most significant difference in outcome was found at 2.9 years from symptom onset; patients who underwent surgery before this timepoint reported an average improvement of 79 ± 23% versus 67 ± 35% in those who were treated after the timepoint (p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that delays in undergoing nerve decompression surgery beyond 2.9 years from symptom onset leads to less favorable postoperative outcomes, underscoring the need for timely referral to peripheral nerve surgeons when conservative management fails. Nonetheless, even with delays in surgical intervention, patients continued to experience significant symptom reduction.

Preoperative visualization of the greater occipital nerve with magnetic resonance imaging in candidates for occipital nerve decompression for headaches.

Occipital nerve decompression is effective in reducing headache symptoms in select patients with migraine and occipital neuralgia. Eligibility for surgery relies on subjective symptoms and responses to nerve blocks and Onabotulinum toxin A (Botox) injections. No validated objective method exists for detecting occipital headache pathologies. The purpose of the study is to explore the potential of high-resolution Magnetic Resolution Imaging (MRI) in identifying greater occipital nerve (GON) pathologies in chronic headache patients. The MRI protocol included three sequences targeting fat-suppressed fluid-sensitive T2-weighted signals. Visualization of the GON involved generating 2-D image slices with sequential rotation to track the nerve course. Twelve patients underwent pre-surgical MRI assessment. MRI identified four main pathologies that were validated against intra-operative examination: GON entanglement by the occipital artery, increased nerve thickness and hyperintensity suggesting inflammation compared to the non-symptomatic contralateral side, early GON branching with rejoining at a distal point, and a connection between the GON and the lesser occipital nerve. MRI possesses the ability to visualize the GON and identify suspected trigger points associated with headache symptoms. This case series highlights MRI's potential to provide objective evidence of nerve pathology. Further research is warranted to establish MRI as a gold standard for diagnosing extracranial contributors in headaches.

Minimally invasive nerve and artery sparing surgical approach for temporal migraines.

Background: Temporal migraines (TM) present with throbbing, pulsating headaches in the temporal area. Different surgical techniques ranging from resecting the auriculotemporal nerve (ATN) and or ligating the superficial temporal artery (STA) have shown similar good results to decrease TM symptoms. No conclusive data supports a specific disease of the STA in TM patients. A minimally invasive technique is proposed to preserve both vascular and nerve structures. Methods: Patients with drug resistant TM were selected and treated with two techniques: nerve sparing and nerve and artery sparing. The study included 57 patients with TM, with an average age of 47.5 years. TM improvement was quantified after at least one year of follow up time. STA biopsies were sent for histological analysis. Results: Forty-two patients underwent nerve-sparing decompression, with a therapeutic success rate of 78.6%, corresponding to 22.1 days with migraine per month decreasing to 6.2. Histological analysis of the STA showed varying degrees of endofibrosis in 75% of the samples. Histological results do not correlate with the intensity of symptoms before or after surgery. Fifteen patients underwent nerve and artery sparing arteriolysis, with an overall therapeutic success rate of 86.6% of which 80% had >90% improvement. The average migraine days dropped from 24 to 2.5 days per month in this group. Conclusion: Minimally invasive nerve sparing approaches are an effective and safe treatment to improve drug resistant TM symptoms. Endofibrosis of the STA was present in 75% of the cases, but it was found to be unrelated to pre-operative symptoms and outcome. Results are promising, but the limited numbers of patients treated with artery and nerve sparing technique needs further investigations.

Choosing wisely in headache medicine: the American Headache Society's list of five things physicians and patients should question.

In an effort to draw attention to tests and procedures associated with low-value care in headache medicine, the American Headache Society (AHS) joined the Choosing Wisely initiative of the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation. The AHS president appointed an ad hoc "Choosing Wisely" task force of the AHS. The committee surveyed AHS members to develop a candidate list of items for the AHS "Top 5" list of low-value care in headache medicine. Through a process of literature review and consensus, the final list of five items was chosen. Draft recommendations went through several rounds of revision and a process of outside review. The AHS Board of Directors approved the final list of "Five Things." The five recommendations approved by the AHS Board of Directors are: (1) don't perform neuroimaging studies in patients with stable headaches that meet criteria for migraine; (2) don't perform computed tomography imaging for headache when magnetic resonance imaging is available, except in emergency settings; (3) don't recommend surgical deactivation of migraine trigger points outside of a clinical trial; (4) don't prescribe opioid- or butalbital-containing medications as a first-line treatment for recurrent headache disorders; and (5) don't recommend prolonged or frequent use of over-the-counter pain medications for headache. We recommend that headache medicine specialists and other physicians who evaluate and treat headache disorders should use this list when discussing care with patients.

Long-term results of migraine surgery and the relationship between anatomical variations and pain.

BACKGROUND: Migraine headache surgery has been recently reported and supported by studies as management to provide long-term relief in migraine sufferers. This study aimed to monitor the long-term results of patients who underwent migraine surgery in our clinic and determine the relationship between pain and anatomical anomalies. METHODS: A prospective review was conducted of 93 patients who underwent surgery for migraine headaches performed between 2017 and 2021 by the senior author (M.U.) and had at least 12 months of follow-up. Anatomical data were obtained by recording the findings during surgery. Migraine surgery was performed bilaterally in all patients. Anatomical symmetry differences between the right and left sides were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 79 (84.9%) patients experienced at least 50% reduction in migraine headache. Furthermore, 13 (14%) patients reported complete elimination of migraine headache. A significant difference was found before and after surgery in Migraine Disability Assessment score, migraine headache index, frequency, duration, and pain (p < 0.001). Also, 30 (32.3%) of the patients had bilateral headaches and 63 (67.7%) had primarily unilateral headaches. Then, 51 (81%) patients with mostly unilateral headache were anatomically asymmetrical and 12 (12%) were anatomically symmetrical. Patients with mostly unilateral headache were found to be anatomically highly asymmetrical (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that surgical treatment is effective and long-term protection and has mild complications that are easily tolerated by the patient. The fact that headache side and anatomical asymmetry were significant in this study supports the peripheral mechanism.

Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Migraines: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis.

Background: Migraine surgery at 1 of 6 identified "trigger sites" of a target cranial sensory nerve has rapidly grown in popularity since 2000. This study summarizes the effect of migraine surgery on headache severity, headache frequency, and the migraine headache index score which is derived by multiplying migraine severity, frequency, and duration. Materials and Methods: This is a PRISMA-compliant systematic review of 5 databases searched from inception through May 2020 and is registered under the PROSPERO ID: CRD42020197085. Clinical trials treating headaches with surgery were included. Risk of bias was assessed in randomized controlled trials. Meta-analyses were performed on outcomes using a random effects model to determine the pooled mean change from baseline and when possible, to compare treatment to control. Results: 18 studies met criteria including 6 randomized controlled trials, 1 controlled clinical trial, and 11 uncontrolled clinical trials treated 1143 patients with pathologies including migraine, occipital migraine, frontal migraine, occipital nerve triggered headache, frontal headache, occipital neuralgia, and cervicogenic headache. Migraine surgery reduced headache frequency at 1 year postoperative by 13.0 days per month as compared to baseline (I2 = 0%), reduced headache severity at 8 weeks to 5 years postoperative by 4.16 points on a 0 to 10 scale as compared to baseline (I2 = 53%), and reduced migraine headache index at 1 to 5 years postoperative by 83.1 points as compared to baseline (I2 = 2%). These meta-analyses are limited by a small number of studies that could be analyzed, including studies with high risk of bias. Conclusion: Migraine surgery provided a clinically and statistically significant reduction in headache frequency, severity, and migraine headache index scores. Additional studies, including randomized controlled trials with low risk-of-bias should be performed to improve the precision of the outcome improvements.

Historique: Le traitement de la migraine à l'une des six « zones gâchettes ¼ établies d'un nerf crânien sensoriel cible ont rapidement gagné en popularité depuis 2000. La présente étude résume l'effet du traitement chirurgical de la migraine sur la gravité et la fréquence des céphalées et sur le score de migraine obtenu par la multiplication de la gravité, de la fréquence et de la durée des migraines. Matériel et méthodologie: La présente analyse systématique de cinq bases de données fouillées depuis leur création jusqu'à mai 2020 respecte la liste PRISMA et est enregistrée sous le numéro d'identification CRD42020197085 de PROSPERO. Les chercheurs ont retenu les études cliniques sur le traitement des céphalées par des interventions chirurgicales. Ils ont évalué le risque de biais des études aléatoires et contrôlées. Ils ont également effectué des méta-analyses des résultats au moyen d'un modèle à effets aléatoires pour déterminer le changement moyen regroupé par rapport à l'état de référence et, dans la mesure du possible, pour comparer des sujets traités à des sujets témoins. Résultats: Au total, 18 études respectaient les critères, y compris six études aléatoires et contrôlées, une étude clinique contrôlée, et 11 études non contrôlées auprès de 1 143 patients ayant des pathologies incluant la migraine, la migraine occipitale, la migraine frontale, la céphalée occipitale, la céphalée frontale, la névralgie occipitale et la céphalée cervicogénique. Par rapport à l'état de départ, le traitement chirurgical de la migraine avait réduit la fréquence des céphalées de 13,0 jours par mois (I2 = 0%) un an après l'opération, la gravité des céphalées de 4,16 points sur une échelle de 0 à 10 de huit semaines à cinq ans après l'opération (I2 = 53%) et le score de migraine de 83,1 points de un à cinq ans après l'opération (I2 = 2%). Ces méta-analyses sont limitées par le petit nombre d'études pouvant être analysées, y compris des études comportant de forts risques de biais. Conclusion: Le traitement chirurgical de la migraine assure une diminution cliniquement et statistiquement significative de la fréquence et de la gravité des céphalées, ainsi que des scores de migraine. D'autres études, y compris des études aléatoires et contrôlées comportant un faible risque de biais, devront être exécutées pour mieux préciser les améliorations aux résultats cliniques.

Functional outcomes between headache surgery and targeted botox injections: A prospective multicenter pilot study.

Introduction: Chronic migraine headaches (MH) are a principal cause of disability worldwide. This study evaluated and compared functional outcomes after peripheral trigger point deactivation surgery or botulinum neurotoxin A (BTA) treatment in patients with MH. Methods: A long-term, multicenter, and prospective study was performed. Patients with chronic migraine were recruited at the Ohio State University and Massachusetts General Hospital and included in each treatment group according to their preference (BTA or surgery). Assessment tools including the Migraine Headache Index (MHI), Migraine Disability Assessment Questionnaire (MIDAS) total, MIDAS A, MIDAS B, Migraine Work and Productivity Loss Questionnaire-question 7 (MWPLQ7), and Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) version 2.1 were used to evaluate functional outcomes. Patients were evaluated prior to treatment and at 1, 2, and 2.5 years after treatment. Results: A total of 44 patients were included in the study (surgery=33, BTA=11). Patients treated surgically showed statistically significant improvement in headache intensity as measured on MIDAS B (p = 0.0464) and reduced disability as measured on MWPLQ7 (p = 0.0120) compared to those treated with BTA injection. No statistical difference between groups was found for the remaining functional outcomes. Mean scores significantly improved over time independently of treatment for MHI, MIDAS total, MIDAS A, MIDAS B, and MWPLQ 7 (p<0.05). However, no difference in mean scores over time was observed for MSQ. Conclusions: Headache surgery and targeted BTA injections are both effective means of addressing peripheral trigger sites causing headache pain. However, lower pain intensity and work-related disabilities were found in the surgical group.

Quality of online information about migraine headache surgery.

Migraine headache is a debilitating disease that can lead to severe functional limitations and is the most common primary headache. In more than 30% of cases conservative therapies do not allow the control of symptoms or cause side effects. Peripheral nerve surgery should be considered in non-responsive chronic migraine or suspected peripheral origin. Nowadays Web has become one of the most important sources of knowledge for patients: the information available on the web is not subject to a control of the sources reliability but can influence the patient. The aim of the study is to evaluate the quality of information accessible on the Web about the surgical treatment of migraine headache. "Headache OR migraine treatment", "headache OR migraine surgery" were the keywords used on two main search engines (Google and Yahoo). Among the first 50 websites, 26 were suitable and we divided them into five groups (practitioners, hospitals, healthcare portals, professional societies, encyclopedias). We applied the expanded EQIP (Ensuring Quality Information for Patients) scale: the EQIP scale consists of 36 questions with three sections (content, identification data and structure). Although the overall average score was relatively high (22 out of 36), many lacks information were highlighted: overall, readability was not satisfactory in communicating information regarding migraine and its surgical treatment. Readability should be tested before medical online publication, in order to provide for its correct use by the patient and improving migraine knowledge.

Letter to the Editor: Insights into migraine surgery - An ACS-NSQIP data analysis over a 13- year period.

We demonstrate the safety of MS based on big data database research and outline the clinical relevance of white female migraineurs affected by menstrual migraines.

Morphologic vascular anomalies detected during migraine surgery.

Although there is increasing evidence of migraine headaches having extracranial origins, the exact mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of surgically treated migraines continue to be poorly investigated and described. We studied the microscopic and ultrastructural characteristics of superficial temporal artery (STA) and occipital (OA) artery in the auriculotemporal and great occipital trigger points of migraine patients to determine their possible role in migraine etiopathogenesis. Fifteen biopsies, 10 of STA and 5 from OAs, were collected intraoperatively during migraine surgery and immediately processed for optical and ultramicroscopic analysis. We detected the following anomalies in all the specimens: (a) endothelial damage with internal elastic lamina fragmentation and intimal thickening; (b) marked irregularity in the shape and metachromasia of the vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), separation of cells by abundant extracellular matrix and vacuoles. The electron microscopy analysis confirmed that presumed VSMCs infiltrated the intima layer revealing a consistent shift of VSMCs from contractile to synthetically active phenotypes, endosome-like organelles, multilamellar structures, abundant extracellular vacuoles filled with fine granular material and membranes, and extracellular vesicles in the matrix space surrounding synthetically active cells. Our study revealed specific alterations in the vasculature at the neurovascular bundles of the temporal and occipital trigger sites. These findings are indicative of an active involvement of the arteries in the auriculotemporal and great occipital trigger sites in evoking migraine.

Letter to the Editor: The Case for Publicly Funded Headache Surgery in Germany.

Headache surgery has become a considerable therapeutic option in headache treatment and is of rising interest in the German medical sector. This viewpoint outlines the need for reimbursement of headache surgery in the German healthcare system and demonstrates its cost-effectiveness. Using state-of-the-art patient selection algorithms, the authors found headache surgery to be cost-effective within 7.2 to 6.3 years. Of note, the approach presented is not limited to the German healthcare system.

Surgical Options for Migraine: An Overview.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this manuscript was to provide a comprehensive review of the surgical treatment for migraine headaches with a focus on trigger points and their clinical presentations, and to emphasize the importance of appropriate patient selection. BACKGROUND: Migraine is a prevalent neurological disease with headache being a disabling component of it. Surgical treatment for migraine headache became available two decades ago, which is based on proper identification and the deactivation of the specific trigger sites in the head and neck area. DESIGN: This manuscript reviews the discovery and evolution of migraine surgery with changes in patients' selection throughout the years. CONCLUSION: Patients with migraine headaches who do not respond or cannot tolerate the medical treatment might benefit from trigger site deactivation surgery. The success of the surgery is closely related to proper identification of trigger point (s) and close collaboration with a neurologist or a headache specialist. This collaboration would enhance patients' positive outcomes and help to rule out other causes of the headache.