Efficacy and safety of Bifidobacterium quadruple viable tablets combined with mosapride citrate in the treatment of constipation in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: To analyze the efficacy and safety of Bifidobacterium quadruple viable tablets combined with mosapride citrate for the treatment of constipation. METHODS: A systematic review was performed on studies published until July 2022 in PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang. The efficacy rate, adverse reaction rate, recurrence rate, and clinical symptoms were included in the measured outcomes. RESULTS: The efficacy of Bifidobacterium quadruple viable tablets combined with mosapride citrate in the treatment of constipation was higher than that of mosapride citrate alone (OR = 4.75, 95% CI (3.27, 6.90), Z = 8.19, P < 0.001; I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.645). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (OR = 0.97, 95% CI (0.61,1.57), Z = 0.11, P = 0.911; I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.958). The recurrence rate of constipation in patients receiving the combination treatment was lower than that of patients treated with mosapride citrate alone (OR = 0.48, 95%CI (0.31, 0.73), Z = 3.38, P = 0.001; I2 = 29.8%, P = 0.200). CONCLUSIONS: Bifidobacterium quadruple viable tablets combined with mosapride citrate demonstrated efficacy and safety in treating constipation. Probiotics have the potential to positively influence gut health and microbial profiles in patients with functional constipation.

An Intragastric Delivery Device Employing FDM Technology: 3D-Printed Tablet Containing Green Developed Mosapride-Saccharin Co-crystals.

Mosapride citrate (MC) is a poorly soluble short half-life drug with more pronounced absorption in the stomach. The present study aimed to incorporate MC co-crystals with enhanced solubility into 3D-printed floating tablets. MC co-crystals were prepared via the green method using Saccharin sod. as a co-former at a (1:1) molar ratio. The prepared co-crystals were assessed for solubility, FTIR, thermal behavior, and SEM. Then, it was incorporated into zero % infill 3D-printed tablets of different configurations at two thickness levels by the FDM printing technique. Printed tablets were evaluated for dimensions, weight deviation, friability, and in vitro floating behavior. Drug release and kinetic of the MC release were also assessed. Solubility study of the co-crystals showed a significant (p value < 0.05) increased solubility over pure MC. FTIR and thermal behavior confirmed hydrogen bonding formation during co-crystallization. The obstructed particles had an erratic protrusion form, similar to a nodule, as illustrated by SEM. The printed tablets showed acceptable physicochemical properties. Tablets floated for about ≥ 12 h without floating lag time. In vitro drug release exhibited variable extended release profiles with different lag times depending on the configuration indicating that the tablet's wall thickness and surface area were the factors manipulated to control drug release. Kinetic analysis of the release data displayed intermediate kinetics between zero-order and diffusional kinetics. The intragastric extended release profile for MC co-crystals of improved solubility could be successfully, economically, and quickly developed utilizing the 3D printing technique.

The tissue distribution and excretion study of mosapride and its active des-p-fluorobenzyl and 4'-N-oxide metabolites in rats by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method.

1. Mosapride is a potent gastroprokinetic agent, and des-p-fluorobenzyl mosapride (M1) and mosapride-N-oxide (M2) are its two major active metabolites.2. The validated ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was successfully applied to the distribution and excretion of mosapride and its two active metabolites.3. Mosapride and its metabolites were distributed widely and rapidly in various tissues. The highest concentration of mosapride and M2 in both male and female rats was found in the duodenum, followed by cecum.4. The excretion study showed that a total of 71.8% (37.6, 22.4 and 11.8% for urine, feces and bile, respectively) and 66.3% (35.7, 22.8 and 7.8% for urine, feces and bile) of administered dose was recovered from male and female excreta. M1 was excreted in the largest dose percentage, followed by mosapride and M2, and the total cumulative excretion amounts were about 36.9, 28.1 and 11.6% in male rat, while 24.3, 25.9 and 16.2% in female rat. The results demonstrated for the first time that M2 is one of the important excretion forms of mosapride, which is much higher than that of mosapride in urine.5. This work could provide valuable information for further pharmacological and clinical studies of mosapride.

Pharmacokinetic analysis of mosapride following intravenous and oral administration in beagle dogs.

The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic properties of mosapride after intravenous and oral administration to beagle dogs. To obtain the advanced pharmacokinetic parameters of mosapride, both noncompartmental analysis and pharmacokinetic modeling were performed. Twenty beagle dogs were randomly sorted into intravenous (1 mg single administration of mosapride) and oral (5 mg once a day administration of mosapride) groups. Blood samples were collected according to the reported schedule for pharmacokinetics. The plasma concentration of mosapride was analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. According to the pharmacokinetic analysis, the absorption rate of mosapride was 3.14 ± 1.14 hr-1 and oral bioavailability of mosapride was approximately 1%. The one-compartment model well described the pharmacokinetics of mosapride after both intravenous and oral administration to dogs. These findings will help facilitate the determination of the optimal dose regimen of mosapride for dogs with gastrointestinal disorder.

[Treatment of postprandial discomfort syndrome in the elderly: a multi-centered prospective randomized controlled clinical study].

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Oryz-Aspergillus enzyme and pancreatin tablets (Combizym(®)) in the treatment of postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) in the elderly, compared with gastrointestinal motility drugs. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was designed and registered in the China Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR-IPR-16008185). The elderly patients with PDS were randomly divided into three groups, including Mosapride group with Mosapride citrate tablets 5 mg 3 times per day for 2 weeks; Combizym(®) group with Combizym tablets 244 mg 3 times per day for 2 weeks; combined treatment group with both drugs and same doses for 2 weeks. The modified Nepean dyspepsia index (NDSI) score, discomfort intensity score and PDS score were calculated on patients before treatment, at the end of first and second week of treatment, as well as 4 weeks after treatment finished, respectively. Adverse effects were evaluated. Results: A total of 323 patients from 16 tertiary hospitals in China were enrolled in this study. Among them, 105 patients were in Mosapride group, 109 in Combizym(®) group and 109 in combined treatment group. There were 148 males (45.8%) and 175 females (54.2%) with median age 71.4±9.0 years (60-100 years). Baseline characteristics of three groups were comparable. After treatment, the NDSI scores in three groups all decreased significantly (P<0.001), while they were similar between groups (P>0.05). The discomfort intensity score and PDS score in three groups showed a significant reduction after treatment (P<0.001), especially in the combined treatment group. Compared with Mosapride group, the scores in Combizym(®) group decreased significantly after one or two weeks [discomfort intensity score: after one week, 4.0(2.5, 8.0) vs. 6.0(3.0, 10.0); after two weeks, 3.0(0.0, 5.0) vs. 4.0(2.0, 6.0); all P<0.05. PDS score: after one week, 6.0(3.0, 9.0) vs. 7.0(3.5, 10.5); after two weeks, 3.0(0.0, 5.0) vs. 4.0(2.0, 7.0); all P<0.05]. The efficacy rate in all patients after first week of treatment was over 15.0%. The efficacy rates after two weeks were 55.2%, 68.8% and 73.4% in Mosapride group, Combizym(®) group and combined treatment group, respectively. After two week treatment, the efficacy rates in Combizym(®) group (P=0.041) and combined group (P=0.006) were higher than that of Mosapride group. The recurrence rate of Mosapride group was 9.5%, which was significantly higher than that of Combizym(®) group (1.8%, P<0.05) and combined treatment group (1.8%, P<0.05). There were no serious adverse effects in the three groups. Conclusions: The efficacy of Oryz-Aspergillus enzyme and pancreatin tablets is comparable with that of Mosapride in elderly PDS patients, with fewer adverse effects and low recurrence rate. Combination regimen indicates better efficacy than that of Oryz-Aspergillus enzyme and pancreatin tablets or Mosapride alone.

Preparation and Evaluation of Mosapride Citrate Dual-Release Dry Suspension.

In this paper, a novel formulation of dual-release dry suspension of mosapride citrate (DRDS-MC) was designed which can be quickly released in the stomach while having sustained-release effect. Co-grinding mixture of mosapride citrate (MC) together with L-HPC as hydrophilic excipient was prepared in order to improve the solubility of MC. The co-grinding mixture was characterized by solubility studies, DSC, X-RD, SEM, FTIR, and size distribution before the preparation of the DRDS-MC. Then, the co-grinding mixture was used to prepare DRDS-MC via wet granulation method. The evaluation of DRDS-MC was focused on physicochemical properties, intestinal absorption, and pharmacokinetics. The results of DSC, X-RD, SEM, FTIR, and size distribution indicated that MC resides in co-grinding mixture with no crystalline changes, hydrogen bonds made L-HPC greatly improving the solubility of MC. Then, the dissolution of DRDS-MC reached 70% in pH 1.2 within 2 h, and the 12-h dissolution of MC in pH 6.8 was nearly 80%. The sedimentation volume after 3 h was 0.94 and redispersibility was good. The linear regression equation between in vitro release of DRDS-MC and intestinal absorption fraction in rats was: Y = 29.215 + 47.535*X (r = 0.952). At last, pharmacokinetic studies in beagle dogs demonstrated that DRDS-MC has prolonged effect compared with commercial formulation Gasmotin as a reference. All results indicated that the DRDS-MC could be quickly released in the stomach while having sustained-release effect.

Gastroprokinetic agent, mosapride inhibits 5-HT3 receptor currents in NCB-20 cells.

Mosapride accelerates gastric emptying by acting on 5-hydroxytryptamine type 4 (5-HT4) receptor and is frequently used in the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) disorders requiring gastroprokinetic efficacy. We tested the effect of mosapride on 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor currents because the 5-HT3 receptors are also known to be expressed in the GI system and have an important role in the regulation of GI functions. Using the whole-cell voltage clamp method, we compared the currents of the 5-HT3 receptors when 5-HT was applied alone or was co-applied with mosapride in cultured NCB-20 cells known to express 5-HT3 receptors. The 5-HT3 receptor current amplitudes were inhibited by mosapride in a concentration-dependent manner. Mosapride blocked the peak currents evoked by the application of 5-HT in a competitive manner because the EC50 shifted to the right without changing the maximal effect. The rise slopes of 5-HT3 receptor currents were decreased by mosapride. Pre-application of mosapride before co-application, augmented the inhibitory effect of mosapride, which suggests a closed channel blocking mechanism. Mosapride also blocked the opened 5-HT3 receptor because it inhibited the 5-HT3 receptor current in the middle of the application of 5-HT. It accelerated desensitization of the 5-HT3 receptor but did not change the recovery process from the receptor desensitization. There were no voltage-, or use-dependency in its blocking effects. These results suggest that mosapride inhibited the 5-HT3 receptor through a competitive blocking mechanism probably by binding to the receptor in closed state, which could be involved in the pharmacological effects of mosapride to treat GI disorders.

Intranasal Surface-Modified Mosapride Citrate-Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carriers (MOS-SMNLCs) for Treatment of Reflux Diseases: In vitro Optimization, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacokinetic Studies.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is an esophageal injury occurred when the stomach contents reflux abnormally into the esophagus. GERD complications include esophageal adenocarcinoma. Mosapride (MOS) is a safe prokinetic agent potentially used to treat GERD. Yet, its low solubility and bioavailability due to extensive first-pass metabolism limits its applications. This study aimed to formulate MOS nanostructured lipid carriers (MOS-NLCs) via the intranasal route to improve its bioavailability. Melt-emulsification low temperature-solidification technique using 23 full factorial design was adopted to formulate MOS-NLCs. Eight formulae were prepared and assessed in terms of entrapment efficiency (%EE), particle size, and in vitro release. Glycerol addition significantly reduced the particle sizes and improved %EE and %drug released. Surface modification using chitosan was applied. The optimized MOS surface-modified nanostructured lipid carriers (MOS-SMNLCs-F7)(stearic acid, 4% glycerol, 0.5% LuterolF127, 0.5% chitosan) showed low particle size 413.8 nm ± 11.46 nm and high %EE 90.19% ± 0.06% and a threefold increase in permeation of MOS with respect to the drug suspension. MOS-SMNLCs (F7) was also evaluated for its bioavailability compared with drug suspension and commercial product. Statistical analysis revealed a significant increase in gastric emptying rate to be 21.54 ± 1.88 contractions/min compared with10.02 ± 0.62 contractions/min and 8.9 ± 0.72 contractions/min for drug suspension and oral marketed product respectively. Pharmacokinetic studies showed 2.44-fold rise in bioavailability as compared to MOS suspension and 4.54-fold as compared to the oral marketed product. In vitro/in vivo studies proven to level A correlation between in vitro permeation through sheep nasal mucosa and in vivo absorption. Therefore, MOS-SMNLCs could be considered a step forward towards enhancing the clinical efficacy of Mosapride.

Mosapride Stabilizes Intestinal Microbiota to Reduce Bacterial Translocation and Endotoxemia in CCl4-Induced Cirrhotic Rats.

BACKGROUND: Impaired intestinal motility may lead to the disruption of gut microbiota equilibrium, which in turn facilitates bacterial translocation (BT) and endotoxemia in cirrhosis. We evaluated the influence of mosapride, a prokinetic agent, on BT and DNA fingerprints of gut microbiota in cirrhotic rats. METHODS: A rat model of cirrhosis was set up via subcutaneous injection of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4). The portal pressure, liver and intestinal damage, plasma endotoxin, BT, and intestinal transit rate (ITR) of cirrhotic rats were determined. Fecal DNA fingerprints were obtained by ERIC-PCR. The expressions of tight junction proteins were evaluated by western blotting. RESULTS: Mosapride treatment to cirrhotic rats significantly reduced the plasma endotoxin level and incidence of BT, accompanied by increased ITR. Cirrhotic rats (including those treated with mosapride) suffered from BT exhibited significantly lower ITR than those who are free of BT. Pearson coefficient indicated a significant and negative correlation between the plasma endotoxin level and ITR. The genomic fingerprints of intestinal microbiota from the three groups fell into three distinctive clusters. In the mosapride-treated group, Shannon's index was remarkably increased compared to the model group. Significantly positive correlation was detected between Shannon's index and ITR. Mosapride did not improve hepatic and intestinal damages and ileal expressions of occludin and ZO-1. CONCLUSIONS: Mosapride significantly increases intestinal motility in cirrhotic rats, thus to recover the disordered intestinal microbiota, finally resulting in decreased plasma endotoxin and BT.

Mosapride for gastroesophageal reflux disease in neurologically impaired patients.

BACKGROUND: The prokinetic agent cisapride is effective for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in infants and children, but is no longer used for this purpose because of safety concerns. Therefore, other pharmacological agents need to be investigated for efficacy in GERD treatment. In this study, we examined the effectiveness and safety of mosapride for the treatment of neurologically impaired children and adolescents with GERD. METHODS: Mosapride (0.3 mg/kg/day) was administered to 11 neurologically impaired patients with GERD (five male; median age, 12.3 years). Esophageal acid exposure was measured using esophageal pH monitoring before and at >5 days after the start of mosapride treatment. The pressure and length of the lower esophageal sphincter were compared before and after mosapride treatment. RESULTS: In the 11 patients, median reflux index (percentage of the total monitoring period during which recorded pH was <4.0) was 17.5% (range, 4.4-59%) before and 8.2% (range, 2.8-20.7%) after mosapride treatment (P = 0.02). Median esophageal clearance was 1.0 min/reflux (range, 0.5-2.1 min/reflux) before and 0.7 min/reflux (range, 0.4-1.2 min/reflux) after treatment with mosapride (P = 0.02). The median number of reflux episodes before (219) and after (122) drug treatment did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: The decreased reflux index in neurologically impaired patients with GERD is due to mosapride, therefore mosapride may be a candidate for GERD treatment.

Comparison of the effects of esomeprazole plus mosapride citrate and botulinum toxin A on vocal process granuloma.

OBJECTIVES: Vocal process granulomas have a high tendency for persistence despite many treatment alternatives. Anti-reflux medications or botulinum toxin A injections are the main current therapies. There are no studies that compare the effects on vocal process granuloma of proton pump inhibitors plus prokinetic agents with botulinum toxin A injections. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Adult patients reporting to our outpatient department complaining of trachyphonia and/or abnormal pharyngeal sensations who were found to have contact granulomas. Patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment: esomeprazole with mosapride citrate (n=26) or botulinum toxin A injection (n=20). The reflux symptom index and reflux finding score determined by electronic fibrolaryngoscopy were utilized to assess efficacy. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were recruited (43 male; 3 female). The mean age (range) was 48.3years (38-69) and the body mass index was 23.51kg/m2 (19.13-27.89). Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease diagnosed by RSI or RFS was found in 18 and 27 patients, respectively, and 18 diagnosed without laryngopharyneal reflux disease. Twenty patients (95%) were cured in the esomeprazole with mosapride citrate group and nine (45%) in the botulinum toxin A group. Eleven (55%) patients had recurrence after botulinum toxin A injection, with an average interval of 3.1months (range 1-6). The recorded symptoms after therapy resolved within 6months with a statistically significant improvement in the esomeprazole with mosapride citrate group. CONCLUSIONS: Combined proton pump inhibitor plus prokinetic drug therapy plays a significant role in the treatment of vocal process granulomas or after surgery.

Mosapride citrate improves nonalcoholic steatohepatitis with increased fecal lactic acid bacteria and plasma glucagon-like peptide-1 level in a rodent model.

Several lines of evidence have suggested a role of gut microbiota in the etiology of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). NASH subjects reportedly showed a prolonged orocecal transit time coexistent with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. We considered the possibility that enhanced gastrointestinal motility would influence gut microbiota and thus investigated the effects of the gastroprokinetic agent mosapride citrate (MC) on gut microbiota and the development of NASH using a methionine-choline deficient (MCD) diet-fed rodent model. Mice were divided into three groups, given the normal chow diet (NCD), the MCD diet, or the MCD diet containing 10 mg·kg(-1)·day(-1) of MC (MCD plus MC) for 6 wk. NASH development was evaluated based on hepatic histochemical findings, serum parameters and various mRNA and/or protein expression levels. MC treatment suppressed MCD diet-induced NASH development, with reduced serum lipopolysaccharide and increased plasma glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) concentrations. Calculation of the relative abundance of each strain based on gut microbiota analyses indicated lactic acid bacteria specifically, such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, in feces to be decreased in the MCD, compared with the NCD group. Interestingly, the reduction in lactic acid bacteria in the MCD diet group was reversed in the MCD plus MC group. In addition, colon inflammation observed in the MCD diet group was reduced in the MCD plus MC group. Therefore, MC showed a protective effect against MCD diet-induced NASH development in our rodent model, with possible involvements of increased fecal lactic acid bacteria, protection against colon inflammation and elevated plasma GLP-1.

Mosapride treatment for functional dyspepsia: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the therapeutic effect of mosapride in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD). METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of mosapride for the treatment of FD performed between 2002 and 2013 were identified from databases. Symptom response rates were extracted and analyzed using risk ratios (RRs). A random effect model was applied based on Higgins I(2) tests. Publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot, Egger's test, trim and fill, and the rank correlation test. RESULTS: In total, 13 RCTs, which included 1091 mosapride-treated patients and 1129 control patients (on placebo or other drugs), were identified and analyzed. Overall, mosapride showed an RR of 0.999 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.869-1.150, P = 0.992) for improving global efficacy or symptom-based scores. In a sensitivity analysis of the high-quality RCTs, mosapride showed an RR of 1.114 (95% CI: 1.011-1.227, P = 0.029). However, in the studies using the Rome III criteria for the diagnosis of FD, mosapride showed an RR of 0.906 (95% CI: 0.807-1.016, P = 0.092). In the studies having funding source, mosapride showed an RR of 1.131 (95% CI: 1.028-1.244, P = 0.012), whereas an RR of 0.966 (95% CI: 0.896-1.042, P = 0.367) was observed in the studies without funding source. Publication bias was not detected. CONCLUSION: In this analysis, we could not find a significant effect of mosapride on FD. Inconsistent diagnostic criteria for FD and different assessment outcomes are causes of heterogeneity. Further studies using common validated outcomes or questionnaires and high-quality RCTs will elucidate the real effect of this medication on FD.

Efficacy of the Japanese herbal medicine rikkunshito in infants with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in infants is among the most common reason for physician consultation worldwide. A traditional Japanese medicine, rikkunshito (RKT), is effective for GERD in adult and pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RKT in infants with GERD. METHODS: Fifty-four infants were referred to between July 2004 and December 2012 for evaluation and treatment of GERD. All infants had failure to thrive. We excluded nine patients with cow's milk protein allergy, neurological impairment or surgical indications. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 45 infants with GERD. Twenty-nine infants were treated with RKT (TJ-43; 0.3 g/kg/day; RKT group), and 16 infants were treated with mosapride citrate at 0.5 mg/kg/day (mosapride group). The primary endpoint was RKT-induced relief of clinical symptoms and bodyweight gain in infants with GERD. RESULTS: After 3 months of treatment, the frequency of vomiting per day was significantly lower in the RKT group than in the mosapride group (P = 0.0146) and the weight Z-score was significantly higher in the RKT group than in the mosapride group (RKT group, -2.5 ± 1.5 vs mosapride group, -5.0 ± 2.0; P = 0.0386). No adverse effects were noted in either group. CONCLUSIONS: RKT may be safe and effective for relief of GER symptoms and for bodyweight gain in infants with GERD.

Development of a novel bi-coated combination capsule containing mosapride and probiotics for irritable bowel syndrome.

The objective of this study was to develop a novel combination product containing mosapride and probiotics for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Enteric-coated hard gelatin capsules containing probiotics were prepared to protect acid-labile probiotics from the stomach by spray coating with hydroxypropylmethylcellulose phthalate, and then coated with various hydrophilic polymer solutions containing mosapride. The influence of different hydrophilic polymers on the aqueous solubility and dissolution of sparingly soluble mosapride from the capsule was investigated to select the one which imparted highest solubility to mosapride in an aqueous solution. The physicochemical properties of the hydrophilic polymer coating were assessed using SEM and DSC. In addition, the bioavailability of the mosapride-coated capsule in beagle dog was evaluated and compared to that of conventional mosapride tablet (CMT). Based on DSC studies, the mosapride in polymer coating underwent amorphization or molecular dispersion. The enteric-capsule coated with mosapride/HPMC exhibited improved solubility of mosapride at acidic pH and showed significantly improved AUC (1.5-fold) and Cmax (1.6-fold) compared to the CMT. In conclusion, drug/polymer coated enteric gelatin capsule can be an alternative technique for co-delivery of sparingly water-soluble drug and acid-labile drug for enhanced solubility and bioavailability as well as for protection from acid degradation.

Structure identification and elucidation of mosapride metabolites in human urine, feces and plasma by ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method.

1. Mosapride citrate (mosapride) is a potent gastroprokinetic agent. The only previous study on mosapride metabolism in human reported one phase I oxidative metabolite, des-p-fluorobenzyl mosapride, in human plasma and urine using HPLC method. Our aim was to identify mosapride phase I and phase II metabolites in human urine, feces and plasma using UPLC-ESI-MS/MS. 2. A total of 16 metabolites were detected. To the best of our knowledge, 15 metabolites have not been reported previously in human. 3. Two new metabolites, morpholine ring-opened mosapride (M15) and mosapride N-oxide (M16), alone with one known major metabolite, des-p-fluorobenzyl mosapride (M3), were identified by comparison with the reference standards prepared by our group. The chemical structures of seven phase I and six phase II metabolites of mosapride were elucidated based on UPLC-MS/MS analyses. 4. There were two major phase I reactions, dealkylation and morpholine ring cleavage. Phase II reactions included glucuronide, glucose and sulfate conjugation. The comprehensive metabolic pathway of mosapride in human was proposed for the first time. 5. The metabolites in humans were compared with those in rats reported previously. In addition to M10, the other 15 metabolites in humans were also found in rats. This result suggested that there was little qualitative species difference in the metabolism of mosapride between rats and humans. 6. In all, 16 mosapride metabolites including 15 new metabolites were reported. These results allow a better understanding of mosapride disposition in human.

Mosapride stimulates human 5-HT4-serotonin receptors in the heart.

Mosapride (4-amino-5-chloro-2-ethoxy-N-[[4-[(4-fluorophenyl) methyl]-2-morpholinyl]-methyl] benzamide) is a potent agonist at gastrointestinal 5-HT4 receptors. Mosapride is an approved drug to treat several gastric diseases. We tested the hypothesis that mosapride also stimulates 5-HT4 receptors in the heart. Mosapride increased the force of contraction and beating rate in isolated atrial preparations from mice with cardiac overexpression of human 5-HT4-serotonin receptors (5-HT4-TG). However, it is inactive in wild-type mouse hearts (WT). Mosapride was less effective and potent than serotonin in raising the force of contraction or the beating rate in 5-HT4-TG. Only in the presence of cilostamide (1 µM), a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, mosapride, and its primary metabolite time dependently raised the force of contraction under isometric conditions in isolated paced human right atrial preparations (HAP, obtained during open heart surgery). In HAP, mosapride (10 µM) reduced serotonin-induced increases in the force of contraction. Mosapride (10 µM) shifted the concentration-response curves to serotonin in HAP to the right. These data suggest that mosapride is a partial agonist at 5-HT4-serotonin receptors in HAP.

Clinical Trial: Efficacy of Mosapride Controlled-release and Nortriptyline in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia: A Multicenter, Double-placebo, Double-blinded, Randomized Controlled, Parallel Clinical Study.

Background/Aims: Prokinetic agents and neuromodulators are among the treatment options for functional dyspepsia (FD), but their comparative efficacy is unclear. We aimed to compare the efficacy of mosapride controlled-release (CR) and nortriptyline in patients with FD after 4 weeks of treatment. Methods: Participants with FD were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive mosapride CR (mosapride CR 15 mg and nortriptyline placebo) or nortriptyline (mosapride CR placebo and nortriptyline 10 mg) in double-placebo, double-blinded, randomized controlled, parallel clinical study. The primary endpoint was defined as the proportion of patients with overall dyspepsia improvement after 4 weeks treatment. The secondary endpoints were changes in individual symptom scores, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. Results: One hundred nine participants were recruited and assessed for eligibility, and 54 in the mosapride CR group and 50 in the nortriptyline group were included in the modified intention-to-treat protocol. The rate of overall dyspepsia improvement was similar between groups (53.7% vs 54.0%, P = 0.976). There was no difference in the efficacy of mosapride CR and nortriptyline in a subgroup analysis by FD subtype (59.3% vs 52.5% in postprandial distress syndrome, P = 0.615; 44.4% vs 40.0% in epigastric pain syndrome, P = > 0.999; 50.0% vs 59.1% in overlap, P = 0.565; respectively). Both treatments significantly improved anxiety, depression, and quality of life from baseline. Conclusion: Mosapride CR and nortriptyline showed similar efficacy in patients with FD regardless of the subtype. Both treatments could be equally helpful for improving quality of life and psychological well-being while also relieving dyspepsia.

Therapeutic effect of Wendan Decoction combined with mosapride on gastroesophageal reflux disease after esophageal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common complication of esophageal cancer surgery that can affect quality of life and increase the risk of esophageal stricture and anastomotic leakage. Wendan Decoction (WDD) is a traditional Chinese herbal formula used to treat various gastrointestinal disorders, such as gastritis, functional dyspepsia, and irritable bowel syndrome. Mosapride, a prokinetic agent, functions as a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine 4 agonist, enhancing gastrointestinal motility. AIM: To evaluate the therapeutic effects of WDD combined with mosapride on GERD after esophageal cancer surgery. METHODS: Eighty patients with GERD were randomly divided into treatment (receiving WDD combined with mosapride) and control (receiving mosapride alone) groups. The treatment was conducted from January 2021 to January 2023. The primary outcome was improved GERD symptoms as measured using the reflux disease questionnaire (RDQ). The secondary outcomes were improved esophageal motility (measured using esophageal manometry), gastric emptying (measured using gastric scintigraphy), and quality of life [measured via the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey]. RESULTS: The treatment group showed a notably reduced RDQ score and improved esophageal motility parameters, such as lower esophageal sphincter pressure, peristaltic amplitude, and peristaltic velocity compared to the control group. The treatment group showed significantly higher gastric emptying rates and SF-36 scores (in both physical and mental domains) compared to the control group. No serious adverse effects were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: WDD combined with mosapride is an effective and safe therapy for GERD after esophageal cancer surgery. It can improve GERD symptoms, esophageal motility, gastric emptying, and the quality of life of patients. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to confirm these findings.

The role of mosapride and levosulpiride in gut function and glycemic control in diabetic rats.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Gastroparesis is a well-known consequence of long-standing diabetes that presents with gastric dysmotility in the absence of gastric outlet obstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of mosapride and levosulpiride on improving gastric emptying in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) while regulating glycemic levels. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Rats were divided into the normal control, untreated diabetic, metformin-treated (100 mg/kg/day), mosapride-treated (3 mg/kg/day), levosulpiride-treated (5 mg/kg/day), metformin (100 mg/kg/day) + mosapride (3 mg/kg/day)-treated, and metformin (100 mg/kg/day) + levosulpiride (5 mg/kg/day)-treated diabetic groups. T2DM was induced by a streptozotocin-nicotinamide model. Fourweeks from diabetes onset, the treatment was started orally daily for 2 weeks. Serum glucose, insulin, and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) levels were measured. Gastric motility study was performed using isolated rat fundus and pylorus strip preparations. Moreover, the intestinal transit rate was measured. RESULTS: Mosapride and levosulpiride administration showed a significant decrease in serum glucose levels with improvement of gastric motility and intestinal transit rate. Mosapride showed a significant increase in serum insulin and GLP-1 levels. Metformin with mosapride and levosulpiride co-administration showed better glycemic control and gastric emptying than either drug administered alone. CONCLUSION: Mosapride and levosulpiride showed comparable prokinetic effects. Metformin administration with mosapride and levosulpiride showed better glycemic control and prokinetic effects. Mosapride provided better glycemic control than levosulpiride. Metformin + mosapride combination provided superior glycemic control and prokinetic effects.