RESUMO
PURPOSE: Few studies have examined whether the incidence rates of invasive breast cancer among Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) populations differ by the neighborhood social environment. Thus, we examined associations of ethnic enclave and neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) with breast cancer incidence rates among AANHPI females in California. METHODS: A total of 14,738 AANHPI females diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in 2008-2012 were identified from the California Cancer Registry. AANHPI ethnic enclaves (culturally distinct neighborhoods) and nSES were assessed at the census tract level using 2007-2011 American Community Survey data. Breast cancer age-adjusted incidence rates and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were estimated for AANHPI ethnic enclave, nSES, and their joint effects. Subgroup analyses were conducted by stage of disease. RESULTS: The incidence rate of breast cancer among AANHPI females living in lowest ethnic enclave neighborhoods (quintile (Q)1) were 1.21 times (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.11, 1.32) that of AANHPI females living highest ethnic enclave neighborhoods (Q5). In addition, AANHPI females living in highest vs. lowest SES neighborhoods had higher incidence rates of breast cancer (Q5 vs. Q1 IRR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.40). The incidence rate of breast cancer among AANHPI females living in low ethnic enclave + high SES neighborhoods was 1.32 times (95% CI 1.25, 1.39) that of AANHPI females living in high ethnic enclave + low SES neighborhoods. Similar patterns of associations were observed for localized and advanced stage disease. CONCLUSION: For AANHPI females in California, incidence rates of breast cancer differed by nSES, ethnic enclave, when considered independently and jointly. Future studies should examine whether the impact of these neighborhood-level factors on breast cancer incidence rates differ across specific AANHPI ethnic groups and investigate the pathways through which they contribute to breast cancer incidence.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Low neighborhood socioeconomic status is associated with adverse health outcomes, but its association with health care costs in older adults is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the association of neighborhood Area Deprivation Index (ADI) with total, inpatient, outpatient, skilled nursing facility (SNF), and home health care (HHC) costs among older community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries, and determine whether these associations are explained by multimorbidity, phenotypic frailty, or functional impairments. DESIGN: Four prospective cohort studies linked with each other and with Medicare claims. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 8165 community-dwelling fee-for-service beneficiaries (mean age 79.2 years, 52.9% female). MAIN MEASURES: ADI of participant residence census tract, Hierarchical Conditions Category multimorbidity score, self-reported functional impairments (difficulty performing four activities of daily living), and frailty phenotype. Total, inpatient, outpatient, post-acute SNF, and HHC costs (US 2020 dollars) for 36 months after the index examination. KEY RESULTS: Mean incremental annualized total health care costs adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, and sex increased with ADI ($3317 [95% CI 1274 to 5360] for the most deprived vs least deprived ADI quintile, and overall p-value for ADI variable 0.009). The incremental cost for the most deprived vs least deprived ADI quintile was increasingly attenuated after separate adjustment for multimorbidity ($2407 [95% CI 416 to 4398], overall ADI p-value 0.066), frailty phenotype ($1962 [95% CI 11 to 3913], overall ADI p-value 0.22), or functional impairments ($1246 [95% CI -706 to 3198], overall ADI p-value 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Total health care costs are higher for older community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries residing in the most socioeconomically deprived areas compared to the least deprived areas. This association was not significant after accounting for the higher prevalence of phenotypic frailty and functional impairments among residents of socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Few national studies across the United States' rural-urban continuum examine neighborhood effects on snacks and sweets intake among adults. OBJECTIVES: This study examines associations of urbanicity/rurality-tailored measures of food store availability and neighborhood socioeconomic status (NSES) with the intake of snacks and sweets in a national sample of middle and older age adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used food frequency questionnaire data collected in the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke study (N = 21,204). What We Eat in America food group categorizations guided outcome classification into 1 main category (total snacks and sweets) and 4 subcategories (savory snacks and crackers; sweet bakery products; candy and desserts; nutrition bars and low-fat snacks and sweets). NSES and food store availability were determined using geographic information systems. Food store availability was characterized as geographic access to primary food stores (e.g., supermarkets, supercenters, and select food retailers) in urbanicity/rurality-tailored neighborhood-based buffers. Multiple linear regression was used to predict each outcome. RESULTS: Living in neighborhoods with a high density of primary food stores was associated with 8.6%, 9.5%, and 5.8% lower intake of total snacks and sweets, sweet bakery products, and candy and desserts, respectively. Living in the highest NSES quartile was associated with 11.3%, 5.8%, and 18.9% lower intake of total snacks and sweets, savory snacks and crackers, and sweet bakery products, respectively. Depending on primary food store availability, higher household income was associated with significantly greater intake of nutrition bars and low-fat snacks and sweets. Living in a United States Department of Agriculture-defined food desert was not associated with intake. CONCLUSIONS: In a geographically diverse sample of middle and older age United States adults, living in neighborhoods with no primary food stores or neighborhoods of low-SES was associated with higher intake of total snacks and sweets and subgroups of snacks and sweets.
Assuntos
Características de Residência , Lanches , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Estados Unidos , Idoso , Meio Social , Abastecimento de Alimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Ambiente Construído , Dieta , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effect of neighborhood socioeconomic vulnerability as it relates to racial disparity in uterine cancer treatment and survival. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of uterine cancer who underwent hysterectomy in New York State from 2004 to 2017 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Neighborhood socioeconomic vulnerability as quantified by the Area Deprivation Index was calculated. Primary outcome was guideline adherent treatment; secondary outcome was 5 year overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 34,356 patients were included in the final cohort. Residence within a vulnerable neighborhood was associated with a lower likelihood of receiving appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy (59.7% vs 75.7% with aRR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77-0.86) and timely surgery (63.7% vs. 74.5% with aRR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.82-0.87). All-cause mortality was 24% higher for those who resided in vulnerable neighborhoods compared to affluent neighborhoods (aHR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.16-1.32). The greatest Black/White racial disparity in 5 year overall survival was seen in the most affluent neighborhoods at 18.6%, with survival being 79.8% for White patients and 61.2% for Black patients (aHR 1.31; 95% CI 1.14-1.51). For patients with advanced stage disease, this disparity was driven by improved survival for White patients with increasing neighborhood affluence but no change in survival for Black patients. On adjusted analysis controlling for age, comorbidities, insurance, tumor histology, stage, and grade, the disparity remained widest in the most affluent neighborhoods in NYC (aHR = 1.59; 95%CI 1.26-1.2.01). CONCLUSIONS: Neighborhood socioeconomic vulnerability is associated with poor outcomes for patients with uterine cancer. The greatest Black/White survival disparities are in the wealthiest neighborhoods. Neighborhood affluence may not affect survival of Black patients with advanced stage endometrial cancer.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Neighborhood socioeconomic status (NSES) has been linked with overall health, and this study will evaluate whether NSES is cross-sectionally associated with cognition in non-Hispanic whites (NHWs) and Mexican Americans (MAs) from the Health and Aging Brain: Health Disparities Study (HABS-HD). METHODS: The HABS-HD is a longitudinal study conducted at the University of North Texas Health Science Center. The final sample analyzed (n = 1,312) were 50 years or older, with unimpaired cognition, and underwent an interview, neuropsychological examination, imaging, and blood draw. NSES was measured using the national area deprivation index (ADI) percentile ranking, which considered socioeconomic variables. Executive function and processing speed were assessed by the trail making tests (A and B) and the digit-symbol substitution test, respectively. Linear regression was used to assess the association of ADI and cognitive measures. RESULTS: MAs were younger, more likely to be female, less educated, had higher ADI scores, performed worse on trails B (all p < 0.05), and had lower prevalence of APOE4 + when compared to NHWs (p < 0.0001). A higher percentage of MAs lived in the most deprived neighborhoods than NHWs. For NHWs, ADI did not predict trails B or DSS scores, after adjusting for demographic variables and APOE4. For MAs, ADI predicted trails A, trails B, and DSS after adjusting for demographic covariates and APOE4 status. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that living in an area of higher deprivation was associated with lower cognitive function in MAs but not in NHWs, which is important to consider in future interventions to slow cognitive decline.
Assuntos
Envelhecimento , Função Executiva , Americanos Mexicanos , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Classe Social , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Envelhecimento/psicologia , Cognição/fisiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Estudos Longitudinais , Americanos Mexicanos/psicologia , Características da Vizinhança , Velocidade de Processamento , Características de Residência , Texas/epidemiologia , Brancos/psicologiaRESUMO
We investigated the independent and joint associations between multiple environmental exposures and incident hypertension in a US nationwide prospective cohort of women: the Nurses' Health Study II. We followed 107,532 nonhypertensive participants from 1989 to diagnosis of hypertension, loss to follow-up, death, or end of follow-up in June 2019. We applied Cox proportional hazards models to assess associations of incident hypertension with time-varying residential exposure to air pollution, noise, surrounding greenness, temperature, and neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES), adjusting for potential confounders and coexposures. We evaluated the joint association of simultaneous exposure using quantile g-computation. We observed 38,175 hypertension cases over 2,062,109 person-years. Increased hypertension incidence was consistently associated with lower nSES and higher levels of fine particles (PM2.5) and nighttime noise exposures: hazard ratio (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 1.06 (1.04, 1.08), 1.04 (1.01, 1.07), and 1.01 (1.00, 1.03), respectively, per interquartile range change. Joint HR for a one-quartile change in simultaneous exposure to the mixture was 1.05 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.09), assuming additivity, or 1.13 (95% CI: 1.06, 1.20), considering potential interactions within the mixture. Hypertension prevention should focus on enhancing nSES and reducing PM2.5 and noise levels, recognizing that reducing the overall exposures may yield additional benefits.
Assuntos
Exposição Ambiental , Hipertensão , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Humanos , Feminino , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Poluição do Ar , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Estudos de CoortesRESUMO
We investigated whether neighborhood greenspaces were associated with physical activity in adulthood over 3 cohort visits after considering perceived safety and neighborhood contextual factors. We also evaluated whether the association with greenspace varied by neighborhood socioeconomic status. Participants (N = 4,800) from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) residing in two Brazilian state capitals were evaluated in Visits 1 (2008-2010), 2 (2012-2014) and 3 (2017-2019). Greenspaces were categorized by quintiles of positive Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) scores. Physical activity frequency was given by the number of visits at which participants reported moderate/vigorous physical activity (none, 1 or 2, and 3 visits). We used multinomial logistic regression. After adjustment for age, sex, education, research center, residence in slums, individuals in the 4th and 5th NDVI quintiles showed 73% higher odds of physical activity over 3 visits than those in the 1st quintile (4th quintile: 95%CI = 1.24-2.43; 5th quintile: 95%CI = 1.24-2.41). The strength of the association was attenuated after adjustment for perceived safety. After adjustment for contextual factors quantity of sidewalks and streetlights, the OR for the 4th and 5th NDVI quintiles decreased to 1.66 (95%CI = 1.18-2.33) and 1.62 (95%CI = 1.16-2.28), respectively. Finally, after including average household income per capita, the OR for physical activity in 3 visits for the 4th and 5th NDVI quintiles decreased to 1.48 (95%CI = 1.04-2.12) and 1.43 (95%CI = 1.00-2.04; p = 0.053), respectively. Greater greenspace contributed to sustained physical activity during the eight years of follow-up, indicating the potential contribution of public greenspaces to reducing health-related inequalities.
RESUMO
Although neighborhood contexts serve as upstream determinants of health, it remains unclear how these contexts "get under the skin" of Mexican-origin youth, who are disproportionately concentrated in highly disadvantaged yet co-ethnic neighborhoods. The current study examines the associations between household and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES), neighborhood racial-ethnic and immigrant composition, and hair cortisol concentration (HCC)-a physiological index of chronic stress response-among Mexican-origin adolescents from low-income immigrant families in the United States. A total of 297 (54.20% female; mage = 17.61, SD = 0.93) Mexican-origin adolescents had their hair cortisol collected, and their residential addresses were geocoded and merged with the American Community Survey. Neighborhoods with higher Hispanic-origin and foreign-born residents were associated with higher neighborhood disadvantage, whereas neighborhoods with higher non-Hispanic White and domestic-born residents were associated with higher neighborhood affluence. Mexican-origin adolescents living in neighborhoods with a higher proportion of Hispanic-origin residents showed lower levels of HCC, consistent with the role of the ethnic enclave. In contrast, adolescents living in more affluent neighborhoods showed higher levels of HCC, possibly reflecting a physiological toll. No association was found between household SES and HCC. Our findings underscore the importance of taking sociocultural contexts and person-environment fit into consideration when understanding how neighborhoods influence adolescents' stress physiology.
Assuntos
Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Cabelo , Hidrocortisona , Americanos Mexicanos , Pobreza , Humanos , Adolescente , Feminino , Masculino , Hidrocortisona/metabolismo , Cabelo/química , Estados Unidos/etnologia , Pobreza/etnologia , Características de Residência , Características da Vizinhança , Classe Social , Estresse Psicológico/metabolismo , Estresse Psicológico/etnologiaRESUMO
Socioeconomic status (SES) at different points in a child's lifetime may have different effects on health outcomes. This study aimed to examine longitudinal associations between SES and psychosocial problems in preschool children (n = 2509, Mage = 24.2 ± 1.3 months). The psychosocial problems of children were assessed using the Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment at age 2 years and age 3 years and categorized as having yes/no psychosocial problems. Four groups of pattern of presence/absence of psychosocial problems between age 2 and 3 years were classified: (1) 'no problems', (2) 'problems at age two', (3) 'problems at age three', and (4) 'continuing problems'. Five indicators of SES (i.e., maternal education level, single-parent family, unemployment, financial problems, and neighborhood SES) were evaluated. Results showed around one-fifth (2Y = 20.0%, 3Y = 16.0%) of children had psychosocial problems. Multinomial logistic regression models revealed low and middle maternal education levels were associated with 'problems at age two'; low maternal education level and financial problems were associated with 'problems at age three'; low and middle maternal education level, single-parent family, and unemployment were associated with 'continuing problems'. No associations were observed between neighborhood SES and any pattern. Results suggest children in a lower SES, indicated by maternal education, single-parent family, and financial stress, had higher odds of developing and continuously having psychosocial problems in early childhood. These findings call for optimally timing interventions to reduce the impact of disadvantaged SES in early childhood on psychosocial health.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Dementia risk may be elevated in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods. Reasons for this remain unclear, and this elevation has yet to be shown at a national population level. METHODS: We tested whether dementia was more prevalent in disadvantaged neighborhoods across the New Zealand population (N = 1.41 million analytic sample) over a 20-year observation. We then tested whether premorbid dementia risk factors and MRI-measured brain-structure antecedents were more prevalent among midlife residents of disadvantaged neighborhoods in a population-representative NZ-birth-cohort (N = 938 analytic sample). RESULTS: People residing in disadvantaged neighborhoods were at greater risk of dementia (HR per-quintile-disadvantage-increase = 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.08-1.10) and, decades before clinical endpoints typically emerge, evidenced elevated dementia-risk scores (CAIDE, LIBRA, Lancet, ANU-ADRI, DunedinARB; ß's 0.31-0.39) and displayed dementia-associated brain structural deficits and cognitive difficulties/decline. DISCUSSION: Disadvantaged neighborhoods have more residents with dementia, and decades before dementia is diagnosed, residents have more dementia-risk factors and brain-structure antecedents. Whether or not neighborhoods causally influence risk, they may offer scalable opportunities for primary dementia prevention.
Assuntos
Encéfalo , Demência , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Populações Vulneráveis , Humanos , Demência/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Feminino , Masculino , Encéfalo/patologia , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Populações Vulneráveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Coorte de Nascimento , Sistema de Registros , Idoso , Características da Vizinhança , Estudos de Coortes , PrevalênciaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Literature has focused on neighborhood environments and their possible impacts on obesity and obesity-related behaviors. However, few longitudinal studies have examined the effect of neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) on childhood obesity. PURPOSE: Investigate the longitudinal association between nSES and obesity and obesity-related unhealthy behaviors. METHODS: We obtained data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study (N = 2,072). The main exposure was nSES (measured using an index of five variables representing wealth, income, education, and occupation from the Decennial Census 2000) at ages 3, 5, and 9. The outcome was children's body mass index z-score (BMIz) at ages 5, 9, and 15. Three measures of obesity-related behaviors (i.e., child- or caregiver-reported soda/snack food intake, fast-food intake, and sedentary behaviors) at ages 5, 9, and 15 were included as mediators and outcomes. Cross-lagged path analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Higher nSES at a previous wave was associated with consuming less soda/snack foods (ßs = -0.15 to -0.11 [varying by ages], p < .05) and fast-food intake (ßs = -0.21 to -0.14 [varying by ages], p < .01), and less frequent sedentary behaviors (ßs = -0.14 to -0.06 [varying by ages], p < .01), but not with BMIz (ßs = -0.08 to 0.05 [varying by ages], p > .05). Unhealthy behaviors did not mediate the nSES-BMIz association at alpha .05. CONCLUSION: Health policies need to target low-socioeconomic neighborhoods to shape healthy lifestyles in children. To develop effective interventions, future research needs to examine comprehensive potential mediators like obesity-related parenting skills, home environments, and built and social environments on the risk of childhood obesity and obesity-related behaviors.
Neighborhood environments where children live and grow up have been shown to impact obesity and obesity-related behaviors. However, few longitudinal studies have examined the effect of neighborhood socioeconomic status on childhood obesity risk. We investigated the longitudinal association between neighborhood socioeconomic status and obesity and obesity-related unhealthy behaviors from early childhood to adolescence. Using data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, we conducted a statistical analysis to examine a mechanism by which neighborhood socioeconomic status at ages 3, 5, and 9 impacts childhood obesity and obesity-related unhealthy behaviors (i.e., soda/snack food intake, fast-food intake, and sedentary behaviors) at ages 5, 9, and 15. We observed that living in higher socioeconomic neighborhoods was associated with consuming less soda/snack foods and fast-food intake and engaging in sedentary behaviors less frequently. Neighborhood socioeconomic status was not significantly associated with childhood obesity. Our results indicate that community health policies targeting low socioeconomic neighborhoods are warranted to shape children's healthy lifestyle.
Assuntos
Obesidade Infantil , Criança , Humanos , Obesidade Infantil/epidemiologia , Saúde da Criança , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Classe Social , Índice de Massa Corporal , Características de ResidênciaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether ZIP-code level neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study of 2009-2014 Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) births with maternal ZIP codes in one of 89 Portland metropolitan area ZIP codes. Deliveries with ZIP codes outside of the Portland metro area were excluded. Deliveries were stratified by SES based on ZIP code median household income: low (below 10th percentile), medium (11th-89th percentile), and high (above 90th percentile). Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression with medium SES as the reference group evaluated perinatal outcomes and strength of association between SES and adverse events. RESULTS: This study included 8118 deliveries with 1654 (20%) classified as low SES, 5856 (72%) medium SES, and 608 (8%) high SES. The low SES group was more likely to be younger, have a higher maternal BMI, have increased tobacco use, identify as Hispanic or Black, and less likely to have private insurance. Low SES was associated with a significantly increased risk of preeclampsia (RR 1.23 95% CI 1.01-1.49), but this was no longer significant after adjusting for confounders (aRR 1.23 95% CI .971-1.55). High SES was negatively associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), even after adjusting for confounders (aRR 0.710, 95% CI 0.507-0.995). CONCLUSION: In the Portland metropolitan area, high SES was associated with a lower risk of GDM. Low SES was associated with a higher risk of preeclampsia before accounting for covariates. ZIP code-based risk assessment may be a useful indicator in detecting healthcare disparities.
Assuntos
Pré-Eclâmpsia , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Classe Social , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , RendaRESUMO
Incidence of obesity-related cancers (ORCs) is rising among US Hispanic/Latino adults, which may be partly due to inadequate engagement in healthy lifestyle behaviors. Prior research on cancer prevention guideline adherence and cancer risk has not considered competing events that may lead to misinterpreting the magnitude of risk between guideline adherence and cancer incidence. Among Hispanic/Latino adults (N = 9204) in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study, we examined the association between adherence to the 2012 American Cancer Society (ACS) guidelines (high, moderate, low) on nutrition and physical activity for cancer prevention and risk of any first observed ORC using Fine and Gray methods for competing risk analysis. Over a median of 10.5 years of follow-up, there were 619 first ORCs. The cumulative risk of ORC over a 15-year period was not significantly different across ACS guideline adherence categories (high cumulative incidence function [CIF]: 2.2%-5.8%; moderate CIF: 2.2%-6.6%; low CIF: 2.3%-6.7%, PGray's log rank = .690). In competing risk analysis, high (compared to low) adherence to the ACS guidelines was associated with reduced probability of ORC (subdistribution hazard [SHR]: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.58-0.996, P = .047), with evidence of a linear trend for increasing adherence (Ptrend = .039). Our findings were consistent with hypothesized inverse associations between ACS guideline adherence and ORC incidence accounting for competing risks. These findings suggest a need for continued public health efforts focused on promoting engagement in healthy lifestyle behaviors to reduce ORC incidence among US Hispanic/Latino adults.
Assuntos
Exercício Físico , Neoplasias , American Cancer Society , Dieta , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/etiologia , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
It has been reported that residents of low-socioeconomic-status (SES) neighborhoods have a higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, most of the previous studies focused on 1-time measurement of neighborhood SES in middle-to-older adulthood and lacked demographic diversity to allow for comparisons across different race/ethnicity and sex groups. We examined neighborhood SES in childhood and young, middle, and older adulthood in association with CVD risk among Black and White men and women in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (1996-2019). We found that lower neighborhood SES in young, middle, and older adulthood, but not in childhood, was associated with a higher risk of CVD later in life. When compared with the highest quartile, the lowest quartile of neighborhood SES in young, middle, and older adulthood was associated with 18% (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02, 1.36), 21% (HR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.39), and 12% (HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.26) increases in the hazard of total CVD, respectively. The association between lower neighborhood SES in older adulthood and higher CVD hazard was particularly strong among Black women. Our study findings support the role of neighborhood SES in cardiovascular health in both Black and White adults.
Assuntos
Aterosclerose , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Adulto , Idoso , Aterosclerose/epidemiologia , População Negra , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Características de Residência , Classe Social , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Fish consumption has been associated with better health outcomes. Dietary patterns may vary substantially by neighborhood of residence. However, it is unclear if the benefits of a healthy diet are equivalent in different communities. This study examines associations of fish consumption with stroke incidence and stroke risk factors, and whether these differ by neighborhood socioeconomic status (NSES). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 4007 participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study who were 65 years or older and recruited between 1989 and 1990 from 4 US communities. Outcomes included fish consumption type (bakes/broiled vs. fried) and frequency, stroke incidence, and stroke risk factors. Multilevel regressions models were used to estimate fish consumption associations with clinical outcomes. Lower NSES was associated with higher consumption of fried fish (aOR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.10-1.98) and lower consumption of non-fried fish (0.64, 0.47-0.86). Frequent fried fish (11.9 vs. 9.2 person-years for at least once weekly vs. less than once a month, respectively) and less frequent non-fried fish (17.7 vs. 9.6 person-years for less than once a month vs. at least once weekly, respectively) were independently associated with an increased risk of stroke (p-values < 0.05). However, among those with similar levels of healthy fish consumption, residents with low NSES had less benefit on stroke risk reduction, compared with high NSES. CONCLUSION: Fish consumption type and frequency both impact stroke risk. Benefits of healthy fish consumption differ by neighborhood socioeconomic status.
Assuntos
Dieta , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Idoso , Animais , Humanos , Características de Residência , Fatores de Risco , Classe Social , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controleRESUMO
A good quality diet in childhood is important for optimal growth as well as for long-term health. It is not well established how eating behaviors affect overall diet quality in childhood. Moreover, very few studies have considered the association of diet quality and a neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage in childhood. Our aim was to investigate how diet quality is associated with eating behaviors and neighborhood disadvantage and their interaction in preschool age children in Finland. The participants were from the Steps to Healthy Development Study at age 2 y (n = 780) and 5 y (n = 653). Diet quality was measured with a short questionnaire on habitual food consumption and eating behavior was assessed with the child eating behavior questionnaire to indicate the child's eating style regarding food approach and food avoidance dimensions. Information on neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage were obtained from the statistics Finland grid database. We found that diet quality was higher at 5 years compared to 2 years of age (p < 0.001). Food approach subscale, enjoyment of food, was positively associated with the diet quality (p < 0.001 for 2 and 5 y) while subscale desire to drink was negatively associated with the diet quality (p = 0.001 for 2 and 5 y). Food avoidance was negatively associated with the diet quality both at 2 and at 5 years of age (p < 0.001). A higher neighborhood disadvantage was negatively associated with the diet quality at the age of 2 years (p = 0.02), but not at the age of 5 years. Eating behavior had similar associations with diet quality both in affluent and deprived neighborhoods. Our results suggest that both the eating behavior and neighborhood disadvantage are, already in the early age, important factors when considering children's diet quality.
Assuntos
Dieta , Comportamento Alimentar , Criança , Comportamento Infantil , Pré-Escolar , Dieta Saudável , Humanos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
The neighborhood literature consistently documents associations between neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and child development. Yet, this approach may miss important heterogeneity in neighborhood resources (e.g., libraries, doctors' offices) that have important implications for children. Moreover, the mechanisms that explain the relation between neighborhood characteristics and child outcomes are poorly understood. Using a sample of 955 children situated in preschool neighborhoods across nine United States cities, the present study aimed to (1) describe the relation between neighborhood SES and resources among our sample neighborhoods and (2) explore whether neighborhood SES and resources may be (a) independently and (b) jointly associated with young children's gains in language/literacy and executive function skills via differences in preschool classroom process quality. Our results suggested that neighborhoods were heterogeneous in both SES and resources, thereby indicating a diverse range of resource availability among lower SES neighborhoods. Moreover, we found that both neighborhood SES and resources were individually associated with benefits to children's development through levels of classroom process quality and that these associations were magnified in communities that were particularly high in both SES and resources. These findings point to potential policy levers at both neighborhood and classroom levels to support children's development.
Assuntos
Desenvolvimento Infantil , Classe Social , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Escolaridade , Humanos , Características de Residência , Instituições Acadêmicas , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Among Latinas with breast cancer, residence in an ethnic enclave may be associated with survival. However, findings from prior studies are inconsistent. METHODS: The authors conducted parallel analyses of California and Texas cancer registry data for adult (aged ≥18 years) Latinas who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 1996 to 2005, with follow-up through 2014. Existing indices applied to tract-level 2000 US Census data were used to measure Latinx enclaves and neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were fit for all-cause and breast cancer-specific survival adjusted for year of diagnosis, patient age, nativity (with multiple imputation), tumor stage, histology, grade, size, and clustering by census tract. RESULTS: Among 38,858 Latinas, the majority (61.3% in California and 70.5% in Texas) lived in enclaves. In fully adjusted models for both states, foreign-born women were found to be more likely to die of breast cancer and all causes when compared with US-born women. Living in enclaves and in neighborhoods with higher SES were found to be independently associated with improved survival from both causes. When combined into a 4-level variable, those in low nSES nonenclaves had worse survival for both causes compared with those living in low nSES enclaves and, in the all-cause but not breast cancer-specific models, those in high nSES neighborhoods, regardless of enclave status, had improved survival from all causes. CONCLUSIONS: Applying the same methods across 2 states eliminated previously published inconsistent associations between enclave residence and breast cancer survival. Future studies should identify specific protective effects of enclave residence to inform interventions.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , California/epidemiologia , California/etnologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Sistema de Registros , Características de Residência , Classe Social , Texas/epidemiologia , Texas/etnologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A growing body of research has demonstrated that individuals who live in neighborhoods with more severe socioeconomic deprivation may have higher risks for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, previous studies have examined neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) at only 1 point in time, and it is unclear whether changes in neighborhood SES also can influence the risks of CRC. METHODS: Cox regression analysis was used to examine different trajectories of change in neighborhood SES over 10 years in relation to the incidence of CRC among 266,804 participants (ages 51-70 years) in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study. Eligible participants reported living in the same neighborhood at baseline (1995-1996) and from 2004 to 2006 according to a follow-up questionnaire. Changes in neighborhood SES were measured between 1990 and 2000 by SES indices derived from Census data. Neighborhoods were grouped into 4 categories based on median SES indices in 1990 and 2000 (low-low, low-high, high-low, and high-high). RESULTS: Compared with residents whose neighborhoods were in the higher SES group at both time points (reference category), those whose neighborhoods were consistently in the low SES group had a 7% higher risk of developing CRC (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.14). Moreover, the risk of CRC was 15% higher (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.28) for those living in neighborhoods with decreasing SES (high-low) over time. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings suggest that exposure to consistently low SES neighborhoods and/or a decrease in neighborhood SES over a period of time may be associated with higher risks of CRC.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/economia , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Características de Residência , Classe Social , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Dieta , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Renda , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Using a case-control study of patients receiving antiretroviral treatment (ART) in 2010-2012 at McCord Hospital in Durban, South Africa, we sought to understand how residential locations impact patients' risk of virologic failure (VF). Using generalized estimating equations to fit logistic regression models, we estimated the associations of VF with socioeconomic status (SES) and geographic access to care. We then determined whether neighborhood-level poverty modifies the association between individual-level SES and VF. Automobile ownership for men and having non-spouse family members pay medical care for women remained independently associated with increased odds of VF for patients dwelling in moderately and severely poor neighborhoods. Closer geographic proximity to medical care was positively associated with VF among men, while higher neighborhood-level poverty was positively associated with VF among women. The programmatic implications of our findings include developing ART adherence interventions that address the role of gender in both the socioeconomic and geographical contexts.