RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nevirapine prophylaxis has been found to lower the risk of HIV transmission in breastfed infants. While about 95% of HIV positive pregnant and lactating mothers use Antiretroviral therapy in Uganda, a smaller percentage of HIV exposed infants (HEI) receive nevirapine (NVP) prophylaxis. This study aimed to determine the proportion of HEI who missed NVP prophylaxis and associated factors. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study done using quantitative methods, conducted at Mulago National Referral Hospital (MNRH). A total of 228 mother-infant pairs were enrolled. The proportion of HEI who missed NVP, maternal, infant and health facility factors associated were determined using a pre-tested questionnaire. Bivariate analysis and binary logistic regression model were used to determine the proportion and factors associated with missing NVP prophylaxis. RESULTS: The proportion of HEI who missed NVP prophylaxis was 50/228 (21.9%). Factors significantly associated with HEI missing NVP prophylaxis included delivery from outside government health facilities (AOR = 8.41; P = 0.001), mothers not undergoing PMTCT counselling (AOR = 12.01; P = 0.001), not on ART (AOR = 8.47; P = 0.003) and not having disclosed their HIV status to their partners (AOR = 2.80; P = 0.001). The HEI that missed nevirapine and were HIV positive were 35 (70.0%). The HEI that were HIV infected despite receiving nevirapine prophylaxis were 5 out of 40(12.5%). CONCLUSION: One in five HEI missed NVP prophylaxis and nearly three quarters of those who missed NVP prophylaxis were HIV infected. Improving uptake of nevirapine by HEI will require interventions that can aid to strengthen PMTCT counselling.
Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV , Infecções por HIV , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas , Nevirapina , Humanos , Nevirapina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Uganda , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Lactente , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/prevenção & controle , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Adulto Jovem , Gravidez , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controleRESUMO
BACKGROUND: HIV is a major contributor to infant mortality. A significant gap remains between the uptake of infant and maternal antiretroviral regimens and only a minority of HIV-exposed infants receives prophylaxis and safe infant feeding. Losses to follow-up of HIV-exposed infants are associated with shortcomings of facility-based PMTCT models with weak community support of linkages. Use of mobile phones offers an opportunity for improving care and promoting retention assessed by timely attendance of scheduled appointments for the mother-baby pairs and achievement of an HIV-free generation. The objective of this study was to compare self-reported adherence to infant Nevirapine (NVP) prophylaxis and retention in care assessed by timely attendance of scheduled appointments over 10 weeks in HIV exposed infants randomized to 2-weekly mobile phone calls (intervention) versus no phone calls (control). METHODS: In this open label randomized controlled study, one hundred and fifty HIV infected women drawn from 3 health facilities in Western Kenya and their infants were randomly assigned to receive either phone-based reminders on PMTCT messages or standard health care messages (no calls) within 24 h of delivery. Women in the intervention arm continued to receive fortnightly phone calls. At 6- and 10-weeks following randomization we collected data on infant adherence to Nevirapine, mode of infant feeding, early HIV testing and retention in care in both study arms. All analyses were intention to treat. RESULTS: At 6 weeks follow-up, 90.7% (n = 68) of participants receiving phone calls reported adherence to infant NVP prophylaxis, compared with 72% (n = 54) of participants in the control group (p = 0.005). Participants in the intervention arm were also significantly more likely to remain in care than participants in the control group [78.7% (n = 59) vs. 58.7% (n = 44), p = 0.009 at 6 weeks and 69.3% (n = 52) vs. 37.3% (n = 28), p < 0.001 at 10 weeks]. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that phone calls are potentially an important tool to improve adherence to infant NVP prophylaxis and retention in care for HIV-exposed infants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PACTR202007654729602. Registered 6 June 2018 - Retrospectively registered, https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=3449.
Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV , Uso do Telefone Celular , Infecções por HIV , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez , Retenção nos Cuidados , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Criança , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Lactente , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/prevenção & controle , Quênia , Nevirapina/uso terapêutico , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Despite increasing availability of perinatal interventions to prevent mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV in South Africa, MTCT remains high due to breastfeeding. To inform policy decisions in the country, cost-effectiveness of alternative infant-feeding interventions was conducted. Mathematical modelling was used to simulate post-natal transmission and mortality due to infant feeding in a hypothetical cohort of 1 000 HIV-exposed infants. Lifetime costs to the health system were calculated for each strategy. Interventions compared with current practice were: increasing coverage of extended nevirapine prophylaxis (ENP) to infants from 30% (base case) to 60% without changing current feeding practices; actively supporting breastfeeding with ENP to infants for 12 months; and actively supporting exclusive formula (replacement) feeding for 6 months. HIV-free survival at 24 months and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted were estimated for typical rural and certain urban settings. Base-case analysis revealed that expanding coverage of nevirapine prophylaxis with breastfeeding is cost-saving and improves HIV-free survival. Changing feeding practices is beneficial, depending on context. Breastfeeding is dominant (less costly, more effective) in rural settings, whilst formula feeding is a dominant strategy in urban settings. Cost-effectiveness was most sensitive to proportion of women on lifelong antiretroviral therapy (ART) and infant mortality rate (IMR). When >55% of women are on ART, breastfeeding dominates in the urban settings modelled, whilst formula feeding is cost-effective in rural settings when IMR ≤ 45/1000. The study concludes that strategies to support breastfeeding are essential. Strengthening health systems is critical to ensure optimal nevirapine delivery during breastfeeding. A case can be made for formula feeding or breastfeeding in HIV-infected women in specific contexts.
RESUMO
Background: Nevirapine prophylaxis has been found to lower the risk of HIV transmission in breast-fed infants. While about 95% of pregnant and lactating mothers use Antiretroviral therapy in Uganda, a smaller percentage of HIV exposed infants (HEI)receive nevirapine (NVP)prophylaxis. This study aimed to determine the proportion of HEI whomissed NVP prophylaxis and associated factors. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study done using quantitative methods. It was conducted at Mulago National Referral Hospital. A total of 228mother-infant pairs were enrolled.The proportion of HEI who missed NVP, maternal, infant and health facility factors associated were measured using a pre-tested questionnaire. Bivariate analysis and binary logistic regression model were used to determine the proportion and factors associated with missing NVP prophylaxis. Results: The proportion of HEI who missed NVP prophylaxis was 50/228(21.9%). Factors significantly associated with HEI missing NVP prophylaxis included; delivery from outside government health facilities [AOR=8.41 95% (CI 3.22-21.99)], mothers; not undergoing PMTCT counselling [AOR=12.01 95% (CI 4.53-31.87)], not on ART[AOR=8.47 95% (CI 2.06-34.88)] and not having disclosed their HIV status to their partners [AOR=2.80 95% (CI 1.13-6.95)].The HEI that missed nevirapine and were HIV positive were 35(70.0%). Conclusion: One in five HEI missed NVP prophylaxis and nearly three quarters of those who missed NVP prophylaxis were HIV infected. Improving uptake of nevirapine by HEI will require interventions tostrengthen PMTCT counselling, assisted partner notification, reduction of HIV stigma and support to the private sector in the provision of PMTCT services.