RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Conservative techniques have been developed in the field of rhinoplasty, focusing on limited tissue resection while emphasizing the reshaping of nasal structural elements. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to prospectively evaluate aesthetic and functional outcomes following Video-Assisted Rhino-Septoplasty (VARS) using validated tools. METHODS: Patients' self-reported outcomes were assessed before and 6 months after surgery. Aesthetic evaluations used FACE-Q Rhinoplasty modules (FQRM) Satisfaction with Nose and Nostrils. Functional evaluations were performed with NOSE scores. T-tests were used to determine the significance of the change in scores before and after surgery. p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included (sex ratio = 0.16, mean age = 30 y.o., 78% primary cases). All patients had associated septoplasties, and 32 had inferior turbinate reductions. Mean FQRM Nose scores were 28.1 ± 16.3 before vs. 83.4 ± 17.2/100 after surgery. Mean FQRM Nostrils scores were 61.5 ± 28.6 before vs. 85 ± 21/100 after surgery. Mean NOSE scores were 49.5 ± 36.3 before vs. 14.8 ± 16.6/100 after surgery. All p <0.001. We found no correlation between FQRM Nose and NOSE scores after surgery (ρ = -0.1553, IC95% (-0.41;0.12), p = 0.28). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that VARS is an effective technique, yielding high patient satisfaction in both aesthetic and functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Liquid rhinoplasty, a non-surgical procedure using hyaluronic acid (HA) to reshape and refine the nose, has gained in popularity as an alternative to traditional surgical rhinoplasty although its results are not definitive. However, the lack of standardized injection protocols has raised concerns about treatment consistency and patient safety. OBJECTIVES: In this article, the authors propose a systematic protocol for the most common indications of liquid rhinoplasty. METHODS: By adopting a standardized methodology, healthcare professionals can enhance patient safety, improve treatment consistency, and optimize patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The protocol includes standardized injection sites categorized as dorsal, paramedian, tip and endonasal injections. Specific injection areas are recommended for different nasal shapes such as droopy noses, dorsal humps, nasal saddle deformity, inverted V deformity, tip shape abnormalities, twisted noses, revision cases with dorsal irregularities, and internal nasal valve dysfunction. While variations in filler dosages may be necessary based on individual patient needs, a conservative approach is recommended to maintain natural-looking results and reduce the risk of complications. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in non-surgical techniques for nasal refinement offers patients more options, and systematized injection protocols based on different nasal types provide a structured framework for liquid rhinoplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
RESUMO
IMPORTANCE: While numerous techniques for costal cartilage harvesting have been described, one consistency in the published literature is that the procedure is performed under general anesthesia. This is the first report to offer IV sedation as a safe alternative to general inhalational anesthesia in cases involving costal cartilage harvesting. OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and safety of costal cartilage harvest with IV sedation. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was performed of 116 rhinoplasty patients who underwent harvest of costal cartilage grafts under IV sedation from 2005 to 2019. SETTING: Private practice of senior author (AF) at Lasky Clinical Surgical Center. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients who underwent cosmetic and/or functional rhinoplasty. MAIN OUTCOME & MEASURES: The number of cases involving a pneumothorax, size of the pleural injury, radiographic findings, repair technique and treatment for pneumothorax were all recorded. RESULTS: There were 7 cases involving a pleural tear (size range 3-8 mm) during costal cartilage harvest and each of these was repaired intra-operatively. All 7 patients remained clinically stable in recovery room on 2 L of oxygen. Although clinically stable, one patient had radiologic evidence of a pneumothorax of 50%, and thus she was transferred to a hospital for placement of a Heimlich tube with overnight observation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although plenural tears can be attributed to surgical technique rather than the type of anesthesia, these cases do provide valuable insight to the fact that successful management of such complications can be accomplished without the need for general anesthesia.