Validation of a quantitative multiplex LC-MS/MS assay of carvedilol, enalaprilat, and perindoprilat in dried blood spots from heart failure patients and its cross validation with a plasma assay.

Introduction: Adherence to medication is an important determinant of outcomes in chronic diseases like heart failure. Drug assays provide objective adherence biomarkers. Dried blood spots (DBS) are appealing samples for drug assays due to less demanding transportation and storage requirements. Objectives: To analytically validate a LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of carvedilol, enalaprilat, and perindoprilat in DBS and evaluate the feasibility of using the method as an adherence determining assay. To validate the assay further clinically by establishing correlation and agreement between plasma and DBS samples from a pharmacokinetic pilot study. Methods: The method was validated over a concentration range of 1.00-200 ng/mL according to FDA guidelines. Adherence tracking ability of the assay was evaluated using a pharmacokinetic pilot study. Correlation and agreement were evaluated through Deming regression and Bland-Altman analysis, respectively. Results: Accuracy, precision, selectivity, and sensitivity were proven with complete and reproducible extraction recovery at all concentrations tested. Stability of the analytes in the matrix and throughout sample processing was proven. The full range of concentrations of the pharmacokinetic pilot study could be quantified for enalaprilat, but not for carvedilol and perindoprilat. The difference between the observed and calculated plasma concentrations was less than 20 % of their mean for >67 % of samples for all analytes. Conclusions: The assay is suitable as a screening tool for carvedilol and perindoprilat, while suitable as an adherence determining assay for enalaprilat. Equivalence between observed and predicted plasma concentrations proves DBS and plasma concentrations can be used interchangeably.

Sepsis Following Liver Biopsy in a Liver Transplant Recipient: Case Report and Review of Literature.

Percutaneous liver biopsy is a relatively safe procedure with low complication rates. Infections following liver biopsy are uncommon and can lead to a poor outcome. There are limited data on liver biopsy-related infections among liver transplant (LT) recipients. Also, there is a paucity of data regarding the use of prophylactic antibiotics in LT patients undergoing percutaneous liver biopsy. We report a case of systemic sepsis following percutaneous liver biopsy in a LT recipient with choledochojejunal anastomosis. This was followed by severe rejection and deterioration of liver function and recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) to the extent that he has been listed for retransplantation. This case report emphasizes the potential risk of sepsis in LT recipients with bilioenteric anastomosis undergoing percutaneous liver biopsy. This increased risk may warrant periprocedural broad spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis, in this subgroup of patients.

Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus a vitamin K antagonist in patients with renal impairment treated for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Germany - A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The risk of thromboembolic events is increased in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and renal impairment. The risk of bleeding events is increased if these patients are treated with anticoagulants and further increased in those with active cancer. METHODS: RELOAD, a retrospective database study, assessed the outcomes of patients with NVAF prescribed rivaroxaban versus phenprocoumon. Here, we present a subgroup analysis evaluating effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus phenprocoumon in patients with NVAF and renal impairment. Analyses were additionally stratified by patients with and without evidence of cancer at baseline. RESULTS: When using the 'one tablet per day' definition of estimating drug exposure time, the incidence of the primary endpoint of ischaemic stroke was significantly lower in patients (without evidence of cancer at baseline) receiving rivaroxaban 15 mg or 20 mg once daily versus those receiving phenprocoumon (2.40 vs 3.51 events per 100 patient-years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.94, p = 0.015); with the incidence of the primary safety outcome of intracranial haemorrhage being numerically lower (0.57 vs 0.89 events per 100 patient-years, respectively; HR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.38-1.14, p = 0.14). Similar results were observed when using the 'empirical defined daily dose' definition to estimate drug exposure time and when including patients with evidence of cancer. CONCLUSION: The prescription of rivaroxaban in patients with NVAF and renal impairment was associated with a lower incidence of ischaemic stroke and intracranial haemorrhage versus phenprocoumon in patients without evidence of cancer.

Fatal breakthrough mucormycosis in a multivisceral transplant patient receiving micafungin: Case report and literature review.

Introduction: Antifungal agents are routinely used in the post-transplant setting for both prophylaxis and treatment of presumed and proven fungal infections. Micafungin is an echinocandin-class antifungal with broad antifungal cover and favorable side effect profile but, notably, it has no activity against molds of the order Mucorales. Presentation of case: A 47-year-old woman underwent multivisceral transplantation for intestinal failure-associated liver disease. She had a prolonged post-operative recovery complicated by invasive candidiasis and developed an intolerance to liposomal amphotericin B. In view of her immunosuppression, she was commenced on micafungin as prophylaxis to prevent invasive fungal infection. However, she developed acute graft versus host disease with bone marrow failure complicated by disseminated mucormycosis which was only diagnosed post mortem. Discussion: Non-Aspergillus breakthrough mold infections with micafungin therapy are rare with only eight other cases having been described in the literature. Breakthrough infections have occurred within one week of starting micafungin. Diagnosis is problematic and requires a high degree of clinical suspicion and microscopic/histological examination of an involved site. The management of these aggressive infections involves extensive debridement and appropriate antifungal cover. Conclusion: A high level of suspicion of invasive fungal infection is required at all times in immunosuppressed patients, even those receiving antifungal prophylaxis. Early biopsy is required. Even with early recognition and aggressive treatment of these infections, prognosis is poor.

XANTUS-EL: A real-world, prospective, observational study of patients treated with rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in Eastern Europe, Middle East, Africa and Latin America.

BACKGROUND: The prospective, observational XANTUS study demonstrated low rates of stroke and major bleeding in real-world rivaroxaban-treated patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) from Western Europe, Canada and Israel. XANTUS-EL is a component of the overall XANTUS programme and enrolled patients with NVAF treated with rivaroxaban from Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EEMEA) and Latin America. METHODS: Patients with NVAF starting rivaroxaban for stroke prevention were consecutively recruited and followed for 1 year, at approximately 3-month intervals, or for ≥30 days after permanent rivaroxaban discontinuation. Primary outcomes were major bleeding, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included stroke, non-central nervous system systemic embolism (non-CNS SE), transient ischaemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction (MI) and non-major bleeding. All major outcomes were centrally adjudicated. RESULTS: Overall, 2064 patients were enrolled; mean age ±â€¯standard deviation was 67.1 ±â€¯11.32 years; 49.3% were male. Co-morbidities included heart failure (30.9%), hypertension (84.2%), diabetes mellitus (26.5%), prior stroke/non-CNS SE/TIA (16.2%) and prior MI (10.7%). Mean CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 2.0, 3.6 and 1.6, respectively. Treatment-emergent event rates were (events/100 patient-years, [95% confidence interval]): major bleeding 0.9 (0.5-1.4); all-cause mortality 1.7 (1.2-2.4); stroke/non-CNS SE 0.7 (0.4-1.2); any AE 18.1 (16.2-20.1) and any serious AE 8.3 (7.0-9.7). One-year treatment persistence was 81.9%. CONCLUSIONS: XANTUS-EL confirmed low stroke and major bleeding rates in patients with NVAF from EEMEA and Latin America. The population was younger but with more heart failure and hypertension than XANTUS; stroke/SE rate was similar but major bleeding lower.

Sildenafil citrate in combination with tamsulosin versus tamsulosin monotherapy for management of male lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the additive effect of sildenafil citrate to tamsulosin in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) in men with or without erectile dysfunction (ED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 150 men with untreated LUTS/BPH with or without ED were randomised to receive sildenafil 25 mg once daily (OD) or placebo OD (night time) combined with tamsulosin 0.4 mg OD (day time) for 6 months. Changes from pre-treatment scores in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS-quality of life (QoL) score, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), and the five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire (IIEF-5) were assessed at 3 and 6 months. Safety profiles were assessed by physical examination and monitoring clinical adverse events. RESULTS: Group A comprised of men who received tamsulosin and sildenafil (75 men), whilst those in Group B received tamsulosin and placebo (75). The IPSS was significantly improved in Group A compared to Group B, at -29.3% vs -13.7% (P = 0.039) at 3 months and -37% vs -19.6% (P = 0.043) at 6 months after treatment. Qmax significantly improved in both groups compared with before treatment (P < 0.001). The IIEF-5 scores improved more in Group A than in Group B, at 58.7% vs 11.7% at 3 months and 62.4% vs 12.4% at 6 months after treatment (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Sildenafil citrate combined with tamsulosin improved LUTS, erectile function, and patient QoL more than tamsulosin monotherapy with the merit of a comparable safety profile in patients with LUTS/BPH.