Iatrogenic "overshoot" nerve injuries: imaging features.

OBJECTIVE: Describe features of iatrogenic "overshoot" nerve injuries on ultrasound and MRI, which occur when an instrument passes through the bone and injures the nerve after it penetrates the opposite cortex. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After a keyword search of the radiology database at a tertiary care orthopedic hospital from January 2016 to December 2022, those fulfilling the inclusion criteria of (1) instrumentation through the bone during surgery, (2) acute neuropathy immediately after surgery, (3) nerve injury confirmed on electrodiagnostics, and (4) imaging consistent with overshoot nerve injury were included. Imaging studies were retrospectively evaluated to determine primary and secondary signs of an overshoot nerve injury. RESULTS: Six patients (3 females, mean age 26.7 (range 10-49) years) had nerve injury fitting the mechanism of injury: 3 injuries to the radial nerve during fixation of distal humerus fractures, 1 tibial nerve and 1 superficial peroneal nerve injury during fixation of tibial fractures, and 1 posterior interosseous nerve injury during biceps tendon repair. Ultrasounds were performed in all while 4 also had MRI. Secondary signs included (1) cortical defect adjacent to injured nerve (n=2); (2) scar extending from bone to injured nerve (n=2); (3) screw tip pointing to injured nerve (n=1, 4) tract in bone on MRI from previous instrumentation pointing to injured nerve (n=2). CONCLUSION: In addition to primary signs such as laceration or neuroma, secondary signs of "overshoot" nerve injury include cortical defect, scar extending to nerve, screw tip pointing to nerve, and linear tract in the bone on MRI.

Surgical treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures is associated with decreased 1-year mortality in patients aged 65 years and older: a retrospective study of Medicare patients.

BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fracture (PHF) is a risk factor for 1-year mortality. This study aimed to determine if surgery is associated with lower mortality compared to nonoperative treatment following PHF in older patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the Medicare Limited Data set. Patients aged 65 years and older with a PHF diagnosis in 2017-2020 were included. Treatment was classified as nonoperative, open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), or hemiarthroplasty. Multivariable logistic regression models examined (a) predictors of treatment type and (b) the association of treatment type with 1-year mortality, adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, frailty, and fracture severity among other variables. A subgroup analysis examined how the relationship between treatment type and 1-year mortality varied based on fracture severity. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. RESULTS: In total, 49,072 patients were included (mean age = 76.6 years, 82.3% female). Most were treated nonoperatively (77.5%), 10.9% underwent ORIF, 10.6% underwent TSA, and 1.0% underwent hemiarthroplasty. Examples of factors associated with receipt of operative (versus nonoperative treatment) included worse fracture severity and lower frailty. The 1-year mortality rate after the initial PHF diagnosis was 11.0% for the nonoperative group, 4.0% for ORIF, 5.2% for TSA, and 6.0% for hemiarthroplasty. Compared to nonoperative treatment, ORIF (aOR 0.55; 95% CI [0.47, 0.64]; P < .001) and TSA (aOR 0.59; 95% CI [0.50, 0.68]; P < .001) were associated with decreased odds of 1-year mortality. In the subgroup analysis, ORIF and TSA were associated with a lower 1-year mortality risk for 2-part and 3-/4-part fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to nonoperative treatment, surgery (particularly TSA and ORIF) was associated with a decreased odds of 1-year mortality. This relationship remained significant for 2-part and 3-/4-part fractures after stratifying by fracture severity.

Complications after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus nonunion.

BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus nonunion is a challenging complication of fractures that can be treated surgically with either open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). The few studies published on this subject have shown high rates of complications and revision surgery when RTSA has been performed for proximal humerus nonunion. The purpose of this study was to determine the rates of complications and revision of this procedure at our institution, as well as to identify any variables that may impact risks of complications and reoperations. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review of all patients who underwent RTSA for proximal humerus nonunion between 2005 and 2021 was performed. Nonunion was defined as imaging evidence of lack of union, at least 90 days after the index fracture. Patients with less than 1 year of clinical follow-up were excluded. Fifty patients were included, with the majority being female (78%). The mean age at time of RTSA was 71 (range: 54-86) years and most patients were initially treated nonoperatively (74%). Mean total follow-up was 49 (range: 11-130) months. Demographic and surgical variables were recorded. Primary outcomes were complications and reoperations. Complications were divided into surgical (those directly related to RTSA), or other (those unrelated to RTSA). Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale pain scores and range of motion. RESULTS: A total of 17 shoulders (34%) sustained complications after revision shoulder arthroplasty, with 10 (20%) requiring reoperation. Six patients (12%) sustained dislocations and 5 (10%) had radiographic evidence of humeral loosening. No variables examined, including nonoperative vs. surgical management of the index fracture, prosthesis type, or management of tuberosities, influenced the risk of dislocation. Survivorship free from reoperation at 2 years was 73%. Younger age at time of RTSA and the presence of diabetes mellitus both increased the risk of reoperation significantly (P = .013 and P = .037, respectively). There was a trend towards increased risk of reoperation in patients who were treated with initial ORIF (hazard ratio = 2.95); however, this did not reach statistical significance (P = .088). Three patients (6%) sustained a periprosthetic fracture after a fall. CONCLUSION: RTSA provides improved pain and function for properly selected patients with proximal humerus nonunion. Dislocation, humeral loosening, and reoperation rates remain high when RTSA is performed for nonunion compared to other diagnoses. In this study, younger age and diabetes mellitus increased the odds of reoperation. Every effort must be made to optimize implant stability and humeral component fixation when RTSA is performed for proximal humerus nonunion.

Trends in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures from 2010 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) is continuing to rise due to shifts towards a more aged population as well as advancements in surgical treatment options. The purpose of this study is to examine and compare trends in the treatment of PHFs (nonoperative vs. operative; different surgical treatments) across different age groups over the last decade (2010-2020). METHODS: The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database was queried using International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify all patients presenting with or undergoing surgery for PHF between 2010 and 2020. Treatment trends, demographics, and insurance information were analyzed during the study period. Comparisons were made between operative and nonoperative trends with respect to the number and type of surgeries performed among 3 age groups: ≤49 years, 50-64 years, and ≥65 years. The rate of postoperative complications and reoperations was evaluated and compared among different surgical treatments for patients with a minimum 1-year postoperative follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 92,308 patients with a mean age of 67.8 ± 16.8 years were included. Over the last decade, there was no significant increase in the percentage of PHFs treated with surgery. A total of 15,523 PHFs (16.82%) were treated operatively, and these patients, compared with the nonoperative cohort, were younger (64.9 years vs. 68.4 years, P < .001), more likely to be White (80.2% vs. 74.7%, P < .001), and more likely to have private insurance (41.4% vs. 32.0%, P < .001). For patients ≤49 years old, trends in operative treatment have remained stable with internal fixation (IF) as the most used surgical modality. For patients 50-64 years old, we observed a gradual decline in the use of hemiarthroplasty (HA), with a corresponding increase in the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), but IF continued to be the most used operative modality. In patients over 65 years, a steep decline in the use of IF and HA was noted during the first half of the decade along with a significant exponential increase in the use of rTSA, which surpassed the use of IF in 2019. Despite the increase in the use of rTSA, no differences in rate of surgical complications were noted between rTSA and IF (χ2 = 0.245, P = .621) or reoperations (χ2 = 0.112, P = .730). CONCLUSION: Nonsurgical treatment remains the mainstay treatment of PHFs. Although there is no increase in the prevalence of operative treatment in patients ≥50 years in the last decade, there is an exponential increase in the use of rTSA with a corresponding decrease in HA and IF, a trend more substantial in patients ≥65 years compared with patients between 50 and 64 years.

Postoperative mobilization after terrible triad injury: systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Terrible triad injury is a complex injury of the elbow, involving elbow dislocation with associated fracture of the radial head, avulsion or tear of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament, and fracture of the coronoid. These injuries are commonly managed surgically with fixation or replacement of the radial head and repair of the collateral ligaments with or without fixation of the coronoid. Postoperative mobilization is a significant factor that may affect patient outcomes; however, the optimal postoperative mobilization protocol is unclear. This study aimed to systematically review the available literature regarding postoperative rehabilitation of terrible triad injuries to aid clinical decision making. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The inclusion criteria were studies with populations aged ≥16 years with terrible triad injury in which operative treatment was performed, a clear postoperative mobilization protocol was defined, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was reported. Secondary outcomes were pain, instability, and range of motion (ROM). Postoperative mobilization was classified as either "early," defined as active ROM commencement before or up to 14 days, or "late," defined as active ROM commencement after 14 days. RESULTS: A total of 119 articles were identified from the initial search, of which 11 (301 patients) were included in the final review. The most common protocols (6 studies) favored early mobilization, whereas 5 studies undertook late mobilization. Meta-regression analysis including mobilization as a covariate showed an estimated mean difference in the pooled mean MEPS between early and late mobilization of 6.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.2-12) with a higher pooled mean MEPS for early mobilization (MEPS, 91.2) than for late mobilization (MEPS, 85; P = .041). Rates of instability reported ranged from 4.5% to 19% (8%-11.5% for early mobilization and 4.5%-19% for late mobilization). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that early postoperative mobilization may confer a benefit in terms of functional outcomes following surgical management of terrible triad injuries without appearing to confer an increased instability risk. Further research in the form of randomized controlled trials between early and late mobilization is advised to provide a higher level of evidence.

Minimum 10-year Follow-up after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Radial Head Fractures Mason Type II and III.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of complex radial head fractures remains controversial with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), radial head arthroplasty, and radial head excision being the most common treatment options. While ORIF is the preferred treatment strategy for Mason type II fractures, the optimal treatment of Mason type III fractures is debated. PURPOSE: To report minimum 10-year outcomes after ORIF of Mason type II and type III radial head fractures. We hypothesized that both Mason Type II and Type III fracture patients would demonstrate satisfactory clinical outcomes at minimum 10-year follow-up. METHODS: All patients with Mason type II or III radial head fractures who were treated with ORIF by a single surgeon between 2005 and 2010 were included. Fractures with significant bone defects were treated with bone grafts and elbow ligament injuries were treated with either primary ligament repair or reconstruction. Patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires were administered at the time of last clinical follow-up and at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients, including 13 male and 11 female patients with an average age of 39 (range 19-60) at the time of surgery met inclusion criteria. Thirteen patients suffered from Mason type II and 11 patients from Mason type III fractures. At initial follow-up, 21 out of 24 fractures (88%) demonstrated radiographic union. Three non-unions, 2 of which were Mason type III fractures, were treated with revision ORIF and iliac crest bone grafting. 11 patients developed postoperative elbow stiffness and required capsular release surgery. At last clinical follow-up, average flexion was 139 degrees, average extension was 4 degrees, average supination was 77 degrees, and average pronation was 81 degrees. The median DASH score was 7 (ranging from 0 - 32). Minimum 10-year follow-up (mean: 14.6 years) was collected on 18 of 24 (75%) of the patients. At a minimum of 10 years postoperatively, the median QuickDASH score was 4.5 (range: 0 to 25) and the median SANE score was 96.5 (range: 75-100). Median satisfaction with the surgical outcome was 10/10 (range: 3-10). CONCLUSION: ORIF of Mason type II and III radial head fractures results in high union rates with good functional outcomes at a mean of 14.6 years postoperatively. The study results suggest that ORIF of Mason type II and III radial head fractures leads to long-term positive functional outcomes.

Short-term complication rates of open reduction and plate fixation and intramedullary nailing in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: a propensity score matched analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This is a retrospective cohort study designed to compare short-term postoperative complication rates between closed humeral shaft fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus intramedullary nailing (IMN), as well as secondary independent risk factors for adverse outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried using CPT codes to identify patients that underwent an open reduction and plate fixation or intramedullary nailing procedure for a closed humeral shaft fracture from 2010 to 2021. Cohorts were matched using propensity scores to account for demographic differences and rates of complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: From the database, a total of 4,222 patients were identified who met inclusion criteria, with 3,326 and 896 undergoing ORIF and IMN respectively. After propensity score matching, 866 of the nearest-neighbor matches were included in each cohort for a total of 1,732 patients in the final analysis. The rate of any adverse event (AAE) was significantly higher in the ORIF cohort (16.3%) than the IMN cohort (12.1%, p = 0.01). The ORIF group had higher rates of postoperative transfusion (p = 0.002), return to OR (p = 0.005), and surgical site infection (SSI, p = 0.03). After multivariate analysis, ASA class 4, increasing age, increasing operative time, and history of bleeding disorder were found to increase the risk of AAE in both ORIF and IMN patients. CONCLUSIONS: While prior studies have claimed higher complication rates in IMN patients, this study found a significantly higher short-term risk of AAE in ORIF patients when compared in matched cohorts. However, individual 30-day complication rates do not differ significantly between procedures, and both have been shown to be safe and effective tools in the management of humeral shaft fractures.

A novel pulsed electromagnetic field device as an adjunct therapy to surgical treatment of distal radius fractures: a prospective, double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether using a Fracture Healing Patch (FHP) device that generates pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF), applied at the fracture site immediately after open reduction and internal fixation surgery, can accelerate healing of acute distal radius fractures. METHODS: In a prospective, double-blind, randomized, and sham-controlled study, thirty-two patients with DRFs treated with ORIF were included. Patients were allocated to a PEMF (active) group (n = 15) or a control (sham) group (n = 17). All patients were assessed with regard to functional Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), SF12, and radiological union outcomes (X-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans) at 2, 4, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: Patients treated with the FHP demonstrated significantly bone bridging at 4 weeks as assessed by CT (70% vs 54%, p = 0.05). Mean grip strength in the active group was significantly higher as compared to control (16 ± 9 kg vs 7 ± 3.5 kg, respectively, p = 0. 02). The function subscale of the PRWE was significantly better in PEMF-treated group at 6 weeks after surgery (27.2 VS 35.5, p = 0.04). No statistically significant differences were found in SF12. CONCLUSION: PEMF application after ORIF of DRFs is safe, may accelerate bone healing which could lead to an earlier return to daily life activities and work. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Symptomatic rib fracture nonunion: a systematic review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Rib fractures commonly occur in trauma patients with varying presentations. Though the literature in recent years has moved toward favoring more early intervention of acute rib fractures, little has been reported on the matter of surgical fixation for symptomatic rib fracture nonunions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a review of PubMed and Cochrane databases for articles published since 2000. Inclusion criteria were studies with greater than six months of follow-up, while case studies were excluded. A thorough analysis was performed on patient outcomes, complications reported, operative techniques utilized, and fixation systems used, among other parameters reported by the articles. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-nine studies resulted from our review, and a total of nine studies met our inclusion criteria with a combined total of 182 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for symptomatic rib fracture nonunions. All studies reported a significant reduction of pain with increased satisfaction in the majority of patients. There were a total of 71 postoperative complications, the most common of which included surgical site infections, hardware failure, and hematoma. The most serious complications were insulting injury to the lung parenchyma or pleura; however, these were extremely rare based off the current literature. The use of bone grafting was common with eight of the nine studies mentioning the benefits of grafting. CONCLUSION: Surgical stabilization of rib fracture nonunions appears to be an appropriate treatment alternative, and various techniques and approaches may be used with similar success. Further studies with higher level of evidence are recommended on the subject.

Stem revision vs. internal fixation in Vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic hip fractures: systematic review and metanalysis.

INTRODUCTION: Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures (PFF) are associated with stem instability and often require a demanding stem implant revision (SR) or internal fixation (ORIF). This latter surgery is increasingly performed in the last few years instead of SR, but it is unclear which is the best treatment to manage PFF patients. The aim of this study is the compare the outcomes of B2/B3 PFF managed by either ORIF or SR, by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cochrane Database, PubMed, Google Scholar and MEDLINE were examined to find out relevant publications dealing with the different outcomes of SR vs. ORIF in B2/B3 PFF of the hip. The effect model (EM) was calculated using Cohen´s d index. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included, reporting on a total of 1629 patients (564 ORIF and 1065 SR). The pooled random EM estimates for reoperation was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.39-1.96; I2 = 78%) in favor of ORIF surgery; EM for complications was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.45-2.27; I2 = 85%) without difference among procedures. The EM for transfusion was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.46-1.12; I2 = 62%) in favor of fixation. CONCLUSION: ORIF and SR were both suitable and effective options in PFF patients, being associated to similar complications rates. Our results show that ORIF performance in PFF patients is associated to significantly less in blood loss, surgical time and in-hospital stay. These advantages are particularly appealing in patients with multiple comorbidities.

Primary arthrodesis versus open reduction and internal fixation following intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a weight-bearing CT analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare primary arthrodesis (PA) versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs), based on clinical outcome and 2D and 3D geometrical analyses obtained from weight-bearing (WB) cone-beam CT images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 40 patients with surgically treated calcaneal fractures were included, consisting of 20 PA and 20 ORIF patients. Weight-bearing cone-beam CT-images of the left and right hindfoot and forefoot were acquired on a Planmed Verity cone-beam CT-scanner after a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Automated 2D and 3D geometric analyses, i.e., (minimal and average) talo-navicular joint space, calcaneal pitch (CP), and Meary's angle (MA), were obtained for injured and healthy feet. Clinical outcomes were measured using the EQ5D and FFI questionnaires. RESULTS: Overall, there were no differences in baseline patient characteristics apart from age (p < 0.005). The calcaneal pitch in 2D after treatment by ORIF (13.8° ± 5.6) was closer to the uninjured side (18.1° ± 5.5) compared to PA (10.9° ± 4.5) (p < 0.001). Meary's angle in 2D was closer to the uninjured side (8.7° ± 6.3) after surgery in the PA cohort (7.0° ± 5.8) compared to the ORIF cohort (15.5° ± 5.9) (p = 0.046). In 3D measurements, CP was significantly decreased for both cohorts after surgery (- 4.09° ± 6.2) (p = 0.001). MA was not significantly affected overall or between cohorts in 3D. Clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the ORIF and PA cohorts. None of the radiographic measurements in 2D or 3D correlated with any of the clinical outcomes studied. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional WB CT imaging enables functional 2D and 3D analyses under natural load in patients with complex calcaneal fractures. Based on clinical outcome, both PA and ORIF appear viable treatment options. Clinical correlation with geometrical outcomes remains to be established.

Nonunion Rate Following Primary Arthrodesis for Acute Lisfranc Injuries.

Injury to the tarsometatarsal joint (TMT) results in instability throughout the midfoot that does not often improve with conservative management. If instability is identified, surgical intervention is frequently recommended, either open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or primary arthrodesis (PA). These 2 treatment options have been compared in the literature multiple times, often reporting similar outcomes. Due to this, as well as the need for subsequent hardware removal after ORIF has led many surgeons towards PA at the index surgery. Concern for nonunion is a leading concern with surgeons who advocate instead for ORIF. The purpose of this study is to review patients who underwent PA and observe nonunion rates. Nonunion at the TMT has been previously studied, but only in the chronic setting. We performed a retrospective study of 34 patients who had PA in the management of an acute Lisfranc injury. The average age in our study was 43.9 years old (range 19-72, SD 17.4) with an average follow-up of 9.4 months (range 4-33, SD 6.2). Radiographs were evaluated for signs of nonunion at regular postoperative intervals. Within the patients included in the study, a total of 71 TMT joints were fused. Overall successful fusion rate was 95.8% at an average of 7.9 weeks (range 6-12, SD 1.4) postoperatively. Individual nonunion rates at the first, second, and third TMT were 0%, 1.4% and 2.8% respectively. Our study demonstrates that primary arthrodesis provides a predictable outcome with low nonunion rates in the management of acute Lisfranc injury.

Posterior Malleolus Fracture Fixation In Lateral Decubitus Position: Surgical Technique and Results in 60 Patients.

The present study shows how posterior malleolus fractures (PMFs) and distal fibular fractures were fixed using the posterolateral approach with the patient in lateral decubitus position, not previously described in the literature. This technique has been used in 60 consecutive patients (42 women and 18 men; mean age 54.7; range 21-92 years), 33 of which presented as fracture dislocations from March, 2021 to December, 2023. After PMFs fixation in lateral decubitus position, release of the sacral support allowed patients to be placed supine (without de-sterilizing the operative field), in order to proceed with medial malleolus or posteromedial fragment fixation. Fractures were classified according to the Lauge Hansen classification as SER4 (n = 50), PER4 (n = 7), SAD (n = 1), and PAB (n = 2). Fractures were classified according to Rammelt & Bartonicek, as type B (n = 40), C (n = 13), and D (n = 7). During the same period of time 14 fractures involving the PM, classified as type A, were treated with indirect fixation, whilst 6 geriatric and/or poor mobility patients with fracture dislocations were treated with retrograde hindfoot nail fixation. Follow-up period ranged from 4-36 months (mean = 14.4; SD = 8.8). Complications occurred in 5 patients (8.3%; 3 had delayed (medial) wound healing, one developed CRPS and one required implants removal and arthroscopy because of metal irritation and stiffness). No deep infections, thromboembolic events, fracture malreductions or malunions were recorded and all patients returned to the preinjury mobilization status. In conclusion, PM fracture fixation was feasible and safely performed with patients in lateral decubitus position.

Should We Fix the Fibula in Tibial Plafond Fractures? A Meta-analysis Reviewing the Evidence Base for Fibula Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in Tibial Plafond Fractures.

Open reduction and internal fixation are the standard of care to stabilize tibial plafond fractures. However, it remains uncertain as to whether fixation of the fibula affects the outcome. This study aimed to review the evidence base for comparable outcomes in tibial plafond fractures when undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of ipsilateral fibula fractures compared with open reduction and internal fixation of the tibia alone. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was completed; 4 studies were included for analysis. This study demonstrated no statistically significant differences in the incidence of nonunion (p = .784) or mal-union (p = .416). There was a greater rate of removal of metalwork in the fibula operative group compared to the tibia alone group (p < .001). The current evidence demonstrates that open reduction and internal fixation of ipsilateral fibula fractures in tibial plafond fractures is not necessarily routinely indicated for all fractures.

Utility of prophylactic closed suction drainage in open reduction and internal fixation for tibial plateau fracture.

PURPOSE: The usefulness of closed suction drains (CSD) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of tibial plateau fractures is a contested topic. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of CSD in postoperative outcomes after tibial plateau fracture. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from patients who underwent primary repair of closed tibial plateau fractures via an anterolateral approach between June 2021 to May 2022 at a single academic center. Fifty-six patients were included and 28 received CSDs at time of surgery. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included. There was no significant difference in demographics, pre- and post-op hemoglobin, estimated blood loss during surgery, length of stay, postoperative MMEs and pain at 3 month follow-up, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), compartment syndrome, flexion contracture, use of incisional vac, infection rate, wound drainage, hematoma, neurologic pain, dehiscence, additional surgery, or range of motion at 3 months follow-up. We noted a significant difference in Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) on POD1, demonstrating greater pain in those in the CSD group. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the use of CSD in ORIF of tibial plateau fractures may not be of significant prophylactic benefit. CSDs in ORIF patients were associated with increased early postoperative pain and had no identifiable benefits. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Open reduction and internal fixation of modified Mason type III/IV radial head fractures with more than three fragments: an analysis of the clinical outcome and reoperation rate.

PURPOSE: It is generally accepted that a radial head fracture (RHF) with more than three parts is not suitable for repair; therefore, most authors suggest straightforward radial head arthroplasty (RHA). With up to 20% risk for reoperation after RHA, improvement in reduction and fixation techniques may represent a valuable alternative before further extending the indications for arthroplasty. To determine the functional results and radiological failure rate after osteosynthesis of multi-fragmentary RHF with more than three articular fragments. We specifically determined (1) the one-year Broberg and Morrey functional elbow score, (2) duration of fracture healing, (3) complication rate, and (4) number of patients converted to RHA. METHODS: This study is a retrospective single-center case series. All patients who underwent primary osteosynthesis for RHF between 2012 and 2019 were included. Nine patients with an average age of 52 years had an average clinical and/or radiological follow-up of 49 months. RESULTS: The preoperative imaging identified nine fractures with four fragments. Three patients underwent osteosynthesis with plates and screws, whereas six patients underwent osteosynthesis with only screws. The mean Broberg and Morrey score was 95 points. Overall, eight of the nine patients had satisfactory results. All patients retained their radial heads and showed radiological fracture healing. Only two patients presented with low-grade complications requiring no further surgery. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that osteosynthesis of RHF with up to four fragments can achieve good functional results with a low complication rate and seems to be a valid alternative to RHA.

Salvage of failed subtrochanteric fracture fixation in the elderly: revision internal fixation or hip arthroplasty?

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare reoperation rate and clinical outcomes between revision open reduction and internal fixation and hip arthroplasty following failed subtrochanteric fracture fixation. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of patients > 50 years old treated for failed fixation of subtrochanteric fractures with revision ORIF or hip arthroplasty from 2003 to 2023. Primary outcomes included rate of fracture union and reoperations after initial salvage therapy. Secondary outcomes included complications (infection, dislocation, bursitis, implant prominence, implant failure, nonunion), pain, and gait-aid requirements by final follow-up. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were identified: 34 treated with revision ORIF and 10 with hip arthroplasty. The arthroplasty cohort was older (75.4 vs. 66.0 years, p = 0.016) but did not differ from the ORIF cohort in sex, type of initial fixation, or reason for fixation failure. Patients treated with revision ORIF and patients treated with arthroplasty had similar rates of fracture union (85.3% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.772) and reoperation (35.3% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.710). There was no significant difference in rate of additional complications not requiring reoperation (0.0% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.071). The arthroplasty cohort achieved full weightbearing in significantly shorter time than the revision ORIF cohort (3.8 vs. 6.8 weeks, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Both revision ORIF and hip arthroplasty are acceptable options for salvage of failed subtrochanteric fracture fixation in patients greater than 50 years old, but patients should be counseled that although the rate of fracture union is high whether revision ORIF or hip arthroplasty is selected, the rate of reoperation can exceed 1-in-4 patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:  : Level III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

Comparison of patient demographics and patient-specific risk factors for readmissions following open reduction and internal fixation for acetabular fractures.

PURPOSE: Acetabular fractures are highly complex injuries often resulting from high-energy trauma. The gold standard treatment for these injuries has become open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). The purpose of this study is to further this understanding and investigate how (1) patient demographics and (2) patient-specific risk factors affect 90-day readmission rates. METHODS: A retrospective, nationwide query of private insurance database from January 1st, 2010 to October 31st, 2020 was performed using ICD-9, ICD-10, and CPT codes. Patients who underwent acetabular ORIF and were readmitted within 90 days following index procedure were included, patients who were not readmitted served as controls. Patients were divided by demographics and specific risk factors associated with readmission. RESULTS: The query yielded a total of 3942 patients. Age and sex were found to be non-significant contributing risk factors to 90-day readmissions. Data also showed that statistically significant comorbidities included arrhythmia, cerebrovascular disease, coagulopathy, fluid and electrolyte abnormalities, and pathologic weight loss. CONCLUSION: This study illustrated how several patient-specific risk factors may contribute to increased 90-day readmission risk following acetabular ORIF. A heightened awareness of these comorbidities in patients requiring acetabular ORIF is required to improve patient outcomes and minimize rates of readmission. Further investigation is needed to improve patient outcomes, and increase awareness of potential post-operative complications in these higher-risk patient populations.

Preoperative chronic steroid use as a risk factor for complications following open reduction internal fixation for proximal humerus fracture.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to investigate the association between preoperative chronic steroid use and postoperative complications following open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for proximal humerus fractures (PHF). METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for all patients who underwent PHF ORIF between 2015 and 2021. A total of 6,273 patients were included in this study, of which 3.4% (n = 212) were in the chronic steroid use cohort. Patient characteristics including demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day postoperative complications after PHF ORIF were collected. Bivariate logistic regression and multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusted for all significantly associated variables, was conducted to investigate the relationship between preoperative chronic steroid use and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Chronic steroid use was significantly associated with age ≥ 75 (p < 0.001), male gender (p =0.006), dependent functional status (p = 0.008), American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) ≥ 3 (p < 0.001), CHF (p = 0.007), hypertension (p < 0.001), COPD (p < 0.001), bleeding disorder (p = 0.007), ascites (p = 0.040), disseminated cancer (p< 0.001), and systemic sepsis (p < 0.001). After adjusting for all significantly associated variables, chronic steroid use was independently associated with major complication (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.06-2.43; p = 0.026), and non-home discharge (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.08; p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Preoperative chronic steroid use is associated with increasing rate of postoperative complications following PHF ORIF. Better understanding and characterizing chronic steroid use as a preoperative risk factor can aid physicians in risk stratification to reduce rates of postoperative complications following PHF ORIF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Prognosis Study.

Outcomes of fixation of Vancouver B periprosthetic fractures around cemented versus uncemented stems.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of periprosthetic femur fracture (PPFF) in the setting of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is steadily increasing. We seek to address whether there is a difference in outcomes between Vancouver B fracture types managed with ORIF when the original stem was a press-fit stem versus a cemented stem. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study at a level 1 trauma center, we identified 136 patients over 65 years-of-age with Vancouver B-type fractures sustained between 2005 and 2019. Patients were treated by ORIF and had either cemented or press-fit stems prior to their injury. Outcomes were subsidence of the femoral implant, time to full weight bearing, rate of the hip implant revision, estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative complications, and the one-year mortality rate. RESULTS: A total of 103 (75.7%) press-fit and 33 (24.3%) cemented patients were reviewed. Patient baseline characteristics, Vancouver fracture sub-types, and implant characteristics were not found to be significantly different between groups. The difference in subsidence rates, postoperative complications, and time to weight bearing were not significantly different between groups. EBL and one-year mortality rate were significantly higher in the cemented group. CONCLUSIONS: In geriatric patients with Vancouver B type periprosthetic fractures managed with ORIF, patients with an originally press fit stem may have lower mortality, lower estimated blood loss, and similar subsidence and hospital length of stays when compared to those with a cemented stem.