Implementation of optically simulated luminescent dosimeter for quality control of gamma ray dose of an accelerator-based neutron source.

BACKGROUND: Neutron beams utilized for performing BNCT are composed of a mixture of neutrons and gamma rays. Although much of the dose delivered to the cancer cells comes from the high LET particles produced by the boron neutron capture reaction, the dose delivered to the healthy tissues from unwanted gamma rays cannot be ignored. With the increase in the number of accelerators for BNCT, a detector system that is capable of measuring gamma ray dose in a mixed neutron/gamma irradiation field is crucial. Currently, BeO TLDs encased in quartz glass are used to measure gamma ray dose in a BNCT irradiation field. However, this type of TLD is no longer commercially available. A replacement dosimetry system is required to perform the recommended ongoing quality assurance of gamma ray measurement for a clinical BNCT system. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the characteristics of a BeO OSLD detector system under a mixed neutron and gamma ray irradiation field and to assess the suitability of the system for routine quality assurance measurements of an accelerator-based BNCT facility. METHODS: The myOSLD system by RadPro International GmbH was evaluated using the accelerator-based neutron source designed for clinical BNCT (NeuCure BNCT system). The readout constancy, linearity, dose rate effect, and fading effect of the OSLD were evaluated. Free-in-air and water phantom measurements were performed and compared with the TLD results and Monte Carlo simulation results. The PHITS Monte Carlo code was used for this study. RESULTS: The readout constancy was found to be stable over a month-long period and similar to the TLD results. The OSLD readout signal was found to be linear, with a high coefficient of determination (R2 ≥ 0.999) up to a proton charge of 3.6 C. There was no significant signal fading or dose rate dependency. The central axis depth dose and off-axis dose profile measurements agreed with both the TLD and Monte Carlo simulation results, within one standard deviation. CONCLUSION: The myOSLD system was characterized using an accelerator system designed for clinical BNCT. The experimental measurements confirmed the OSLD achieved similar, if not superior to, the currently utilized dosimetry system for routine QA of an accelerator-based BNCT system. The OSLD system would be a suitable replacement for the current TLD system for performing routine QA of gamma ray dose measurement in a BNCT irradiation field.

Dosimetric impact of hollow intraoral stents for head and neck cancer radiotherapy: A phantom study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the dosimetric impact of the calculation boundaries and dose calculation algorithms of radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients with an opened oral cavity connected to the exterior by a hollow intraoral positioning stent. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A homemade silicone phantom with an opened oral cavity was placed in a CIRS head phantom to model head and neck cancer patients with a hollow intraoral positioning stent. 3D-CRT plans were designed on CT images of the phantom in Monaco and Pinnacle3 treatment planning systems (TPSs) with the same beam parameters. The default boundary and manually extrapolated boundary were both adopted in these two TPSs to explore the dosimetric impact on treatment plans. The nanoDot™ optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) were chosen to measure the planned dose surrounding the oral cavity of the head phantom after calibration. RESULT: The doses in the air cavity and two measuring points at the joint area were dramatically changed from 0.0, 92.4 and 148.8 cGy to 177.8, 244.2 and 244.1 cGy in Monaco after adopting the extrapolated boundary. While the calculated doses at the same place were changed from 61.2, 143.7 and 198.3 cGy to 175.4, 234.7 and 233.2 cGy in Pinnacle3 with a similar calculation boundary. For the Monaco TPS, the relative errors compared to the OSLD measured doses were 2.94 ± 1.93%, 0.53 ± 8.64%, 2.65 ± 1.87% and 3.93 ± 1.69% at 4 measuring positions. In contrast, the relative errors 4.03 ± 1.93%, 4.85 ± 8.64%, 7.61 ± 1.87% and 5.61 ± 1.69% were observed in Pinnacle3 . CONCLUSION: The boundary setting of an opened oral cavity in TPSs has a significant dosimetric impact on head and neck cancer radiotherapy. An extrapolated boundary should be manually set up to include the whole oral cavity in the dose calculation domain to avoid major dose deviations.

Effective dose and radiation risk under 640-slice abdominal computed tomography examination without contrast medium injection.

BACKGROUND: Medical imaging plays a crucial role in modern medicine. In order to provide fast and accurate medical diagnosis, computed tomography (CT) is a commonly used tool in radiological examinations, and 640-slice CT is the most advanced CT imaging modality. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the radiation dose and the risk under 640-slice abdominal CT examination. METHODS: Examinations were performed using a 640-slice CT scanner on an Alderson-Rando anthropomorphic phantom. The used scanning acquisition parameters were the same as those used on abdominal examination without contrast medium injection in clinical practice. To measure the absorbed doses, optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) were put into liver, stomach, bladder, gonads, colon, small intestine, bone marrow, and skin. RESULTS: According to the 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP Publication 60), the calculated effective doses received from this examination were 0.90 mSv in males and 0.89 mSv in females. According to the 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP Publication 103), the calculated effective dose received from this examination was 0.83 mSv in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation doses obtained from the abdominal 640-slice CT examination are lower than the yearly cumulative doses received from natural radiation, revealing there is no deterministic effect and radiation risk is relatively low; therefore, this CT examination is considered safe.

Technical Note: A novel dosimeter improves total skin electron therapy surface dosimetry workflow.

PURPOSE: The novel scintillator-based system described in this study is capable of accurately and remotely measuring surface dose during Total Skin Electron Therapy (TSET); this dosimeter does not require post-exposure processing or annealing and has been shown to be re-usable, resistant to radiation damage, have minimal impact on surface dose, and reduce chances of operator error compared to existing technologies e.g. optically stimulated luminescence detector (OSLD). The purpose of this study was to quantitatively analyze the workflow required to measure surface dose using this new scintillator dosimeter and compare it to that of standard OSLDs. METHODS: Disc-shaped scintillators were attached to a flat-faced phantom and a patient undergoing TSET. Light emission from these plastic discs was captured using a time-gated, intensified, camera during irradiation and converted to dose using an external calibration factor. Time required to complete each step (daily QA, dosimeter preparation, attachment, removal, registration, and readout) of the scintillator and OSLD surface dosimetry workflows was tracked. RESULTS: In phantoms, scintillators and OSLDs surface doses agreed within 3% for all data points. During patient imaging it was found that surface dose measured by OSLD and scintillator agreed within 5% and 3% for 35/35 and 32/35 dosimetry sites, respectively. The end-to-end time required to measure surface dose during phantom experiments for a single dosimeter was 78 and 202 sec for scintillator and OSL dosimeters, respectively. During patient treatment, surface dose was assessed at 7 different body locations by scintillator and OSL dosimeters in 386 and 754 sec, respectively. CONCLUSION: Scintillators have been shown to report dose nearly twice as fast as OSLDs with substantially less manual work and reduced chances of human error. Scintillator dose measurements are automatically saved to an electronic patient file and images contain a permanent record of the dose delivered during treatment.

Radiation dose measurements in a dental orthopantogram unit using indigenously developed optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters.

Dental orthopantogram (OPG)/cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanners are gaining popularity due to their 3D imaging with multiplanar view that provides clinical benefits over conventional dental radiography systems. Dental OPG/CBCT provides optimal visualization of adjacent overlaying anatomical structures that will be superpositioned in any single projection. The characteristics of indigenously developed optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters, namely, aluminium oxide doped with carbon (Al2 O3 :C), lithium magnesium phosphate doped with terbium and boron (LiMgPO4 :Tb,B) and lithium calcium aluminium fluoride doped with europium and yttrium (LiCaAlF6 :Eu,Y) were evaluated for their use in dental dosimetry. The dose-response of these dosimeters was studied at X-ray energies 60 kV, 70 kV and 81 kV. Radiation doses were also measured using Gafchromic film for comparison. Radiation dose was measured at eight different locations of a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) head phantom including eyes. The optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) sensitivity of LiMgPO4 :Tb,B is about 1.5 times and LiCaAlF6 :Eu, is about 20 times higher than the sensitivity of Al2 O3 :C. It was found that measured radiation doses by the three optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) and Gafchromic film in the occipital region (back side) of a PMMA phantom, were consistent but variations in dose at other locations were significantly higher. The three OSLDs used in this study were found to be suitable for radiation dose measurement in dental units.

Calibration strategies for use of the nanoDot OSLD in CT applications.

Aluminum oxide based optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLD) have been recognized as a useful dosimeter for measuring CT dose, particularly for patient dose measurements. Despite the increasing use of this dosimeter, appropriate dosimeter calibration techniques have not been established in the literature; while the manufacturer offers a calibration procedure, it is known to have relatively large uncertainties. The purpose of this work was to evaluate two clinical approaches for calibrating these dosimeters for CT applications, and to determine the uncertainty associated with measurements using these techniques. Three unique calibration procedures were used to calculate dose for a range of CT conditions using a commercially available OSLD and reader. The three calibration procedures included calibration (a) using the vendor-provided method, (b) relative to a 120 kVp CT spectrum in air, and (c) relative to a megavoltage beam (implemented with 60 Co). The dose measured using each of these approaches was compared to dose measured using a calibrated farmer-type ion chamber. Finally, the uncertainty in the dose measured using each approach was determined. For the CT and megavoltage calibration methods, the dose measured using the OSLD nanoDot was within 5% of the dose measured using an ion chamber for a wide range of different CT scan parameters (80-140 kVp, and with measurements at a range of positions). When calibrated using the vendor-recommended protocol, the OSLD measured doses were on average 15.5% lower than ion chamber doses. Two clinical calibration techniques have been evaluated and are presented in this work as alternatives to the vendor-provided calibration approach. These techniques provide high precision for OSLD-based measurements in a CT environment.

TLD and OSLD dosimetry systems for remote audits of radiotherapy external beam calibration.

The Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core QA Center in Houston (IROC-H) performs remote dosimetry audits of more than 20,000 megavoltage photon and electron beams each year. Both a thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD-100) and optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter (OSLD; nanoDot) system are commissioned for this task, with the OSLD system being predominant due to the more time-efficient read-out process. The measurement apparatus includes 3 TLD or 2 OSLD in an acrylic mini-phantom, which are irradiated by the institution under reference geometry. Dosimetry systems are calibrated based on the signal-to-dose conversion established with reference dosimeters irradiated in a Co-60 beam, using a reference dose of 300 cGy for TLD and 100 cGy for OSLD. The uncertainty in the dose determination is 1.3% for TLD and 1.6% for OSLD at the one sigma level. This accuracy allows for a tolerance of ±5% to be used.

Chromatic bleaching and fractionation effects on optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter reuse.

BACKGROUND: Optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs) can be bleached and reused, but questions remain about the effects of repeated bleaching and fractionation schedules on OSLD performance. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate how light sources with different wavelengths and different fractionation schemes affect the performance of reused OSLDs. METHODS: OSLDs (N = 240) were irradiated on a cobalt-60 beam in different step sizes until they reached an accumulated dose of 50 Gy. Between irradiations they were bleached using light sources of different wavelengths: the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) bleaching system (our control); monochromatic red, green, yellow, and blue lights; and a polychromatic white light. Sensitivity and linearity-based correction factors were determined as a function of dose step-size. The rate of signal removal from different light sources was characterized by sampling these OSLDs at various time points during their bleaching process. Relative doses were calculated according to the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group-191. Signal repopulation was investigated by irradiating OSLDs (N = 300) to various delivered doses of 2, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 Gy in a single fraction, bleached with one of the colors, and read over time. Fractionation effects were evaluated by irradiating OSLDs up to 30 Gy in different size steps. After reading, the OSLDs were bleached following IROC protocol. OSLDs (N = 40) received irradiations in 5, 10, 15, 30 Gy fractions until they had an accumulated dose of 30 Gy; The sensitivity response of these OSLDs was compared with reference OSLDs that had no accumulated dose. RESULTS: Light sources with polychromatic spectrums (IROC and white) bleached OSLDs faster than did sources with monochromatic spectra. Polychromatic light sources (white light and IROC system) provided the greatest dose stability for OSLDs that had larger amounts of accumulated dose. Signal repopulation was related to the choice of bleaching light source, timing of bleaching, and amount of accumulated dose. Changes to relative dosimetry were more pronounced in OSLDs that received larger fractions. At 5-Gy fractions and above, all OSLDs had heightened sensitivity, with OSLDs exposed to 30-Gy fractions being 6.4% more sensitive than reference dosimeters. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of bleaching light plays a role in how fast an OSLD is bleached and how much accumulated dose an OSLD can be exposed to while maintaining stable signal sensitivity. We have expanded upon investigations into signal repopulation to show that bleaching light plays a role in the migration of deep traps to dosimetric traps after bleaching. Our research concludes that the bleaching light source and fractionation need to be considered when reusing OSLD.

Evaluation of the Treatment Planning and Delivery for Hip Implant Cases on Tomotherapy.

Purpose: The metal present in the implant creates artifacts during the treatment simulation, which impacts the treatment planning and delivery of the prescribed dose to the target and sparing normal tissues. This retrospective study evaluated the uncertainties in the planning and delivery of doses for prosthesis cases with dedicated phantom. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 11 patients with a hip prosthesis having cervix carcinoma were selected. Two treatment plans were generated on treatment planning system (TPS) for each case. Plan_No_Res was without any beam restriction, and Plan_exit_only was the plan with restricted beam entry through the metallic implant. An indigenous phantom was utilized to verify the accuracy of the treatment. In the phantom, some groves were present, which could be filled by implants that mimic the patient's geometries, like left, right and bilateral femur implants. The delivered doses were recorded using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs), which were placed at different positions in the phantom. The plans were further calculated using megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) scans acquired during treatment. Results: The patient data showed no significant dose changes between the two planning methods. The treatment time increases from 412.18 ± 86.65 to 427.36 ± 104.80 with P = 0.03 for Plan_No_Res and Plan_exit_only, respectively. The difference between planned and delivered doses of various points across phantom geometries was within ± 9.5% in each case as left, right, and bilateral implant. The variations between OSLDs and MVCT calculated doses were also within ± 10.8%. Conclusion: The study showed the competency of tomotherapy planning for hip prosthesis cases. The phantom measurements demonstrate the errors in dosimetry near the implant material, suggesting the need for precise methods to deal with artifact-related issues.

OSLD nanoDot characterization for carbon radiotherapy dosimetry.

Objective. This study characterized optically-stimulated luminescent dosimeter (OSLD) nanoDots for use in a therapeutic carbon beam using the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) framework for remote output verification.Approach. The absorbed dose correction factors for OSLD (fading, linearity, beam quality, angularity, and depletion), as defined by AAPM TG 191, were characterized for carbon beams. For the various correction factors, the effect of linear energy transfer (LET) was examined by characterizing in both a low and high LET setting.Main results. Fading was not statistically different between reference photons and carbon, nor between low and high LET beams; thus, the standard IROC-defined exponential function could be used to characterize fading. Dose linearity was characterized with a linear fit; while low and high LET carbon linearity was different, these differences were small and could be rolled into the uncertainty budget if using a single linearity correction. A linear fit between beam quality and dose-averaged LET was determined. The OSLD response at various angles of incidence was not statistically different, thus a correction factor need not be applied. There was a difference in depletion between low and high LET irradiations in a primary carbon beam, but this difference was small over the standard five readings. The largest uncertainty associated with the use of OSLDs in carbon was because of thekQcorrection factor, with an uncertainty of 6.0%. The overall uncertainty budget was 6.3% for standard irradiation conditions.Significance. OSLD nanoDot response was characterized in a therapeutic carbon beam. The uncertainty was larger than for traditional photon applications. These findings enable the use of OSLDs for carbon absorbed dose measurements, but with less accuracy than conventional OSLD audit programs.

Assessment of fluence- and dose-averaged linear energy transfer with passive luminescence detectors in clinical proton beams.

Objective.This work investigates the use of passive luminescence detectors to determine different types of averaged linear energy transfer (LET-) for the energies relevant to proton therapy. The experimental results are compared to reference values obtained from Monte Carlo simulations.Approach.Optically stimulated luminescence detectors (OSLDs), fluorescent nuclear track detectors (FNTDs), and two different groups of thermoluminescence detectors (TLDs) were irradiated at four different radiation qualities. For each irradiation, the fluence- (LET-f) and dose-averaged LET (LET-d) were determined. For both quantities, two sub-types of averages were calculated, either considering the contributions from primary and secondary protons or from all protons and heavier, charged particles. Both simulated and experimental data were used in combination with a phenomenological model to estimate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE).Main results.All types ofLET-could be assessed with the luminescence detectors. The experimental determination ofLET-fis in agreement with reference data obtained from simulations across all measurement techniques and types of averaging. On the other hand,LET-dcan present challenges as a radiation quality metric to describe the detector response in mixed particle fields. However, excluding secondaries heavier than protons from theLET-dcalculation, as their contribution to the luminescence is suppressed by ionization quenching, leads to equal accuracy betweenLET-fandLET-d. Assessment of RBE through the experimentally determinedLET-dvalues agrees with independently acquired reference values, indicating that the investigated detectors can determineLET-with sufficient accuracy for proton therapy.Significance.OSLDs, TLDs, and FNTDs can be used to determineLET-and RBE in proton therapy. With the capability to determine dose through ionization quenching corrections derived fromLET-, OSLDs and TLDs can simultaneously ascertain dose,LET-, and RBE. This makes passive detectors appealing for measurements in phantoms to facilitate validation of clinical treatment plans or experiments related to proton therapy.

Surface dose measurement and comparison between TLD and OSLD during modified re constructive mastectomy irradiation.

Radiotherapy (RT) is one of the major treatment modalities among surgery and chemotherapy for carcinoma breast. The surface dose study of modified reconstructive constructive Mastectomy (MRM) breast is important due to the heterogeneity in the body contour and the conventional treatment angle to save the lungs and heart from the radiation. These angular entries of radiation beam cause an unpredictable dose deposition on the body surface, which has to be monitored. Thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) or optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter (nano OSLD) are commonly preferable dosimeters for this purpose. The surface dose response of TLD and nano OSLD during MRM irradiation has been compared with the predicted dose from the treatment planning system (TPS). The study monitored 100 MRM patients by employing a total 500 dosimeters consisting of TLD (n = 250) and nano OSLD (n = 250), during irradiation from an Elekta Versa HD 6 MV Linear accelerator. The study observed a variance of 3.9% in the dose measurements for TLD and 3.2% for nano OSLD from the planned surface dose, with a median percentage dose of 44.02 for nano OSLD and 40.30 for TLD (p value 0.01). There was no discernible evidence of variation in dose measurements attributable to differences in field size or from patient to patient. Additionally, no variation was observed in dose measurements when comparing the placement of the dosimeter from central to off-centre positions. In comparison, a minor difference in dose measurements were noted between TLD and nano OSLD, The study's outcomes support the applicability of both TLD and nano OSLD as effective dosimeters during MRM breast irradiation for surface dose evaluation.

Feasibility of Customized Thermoplastic Patient-Specific Helmet Bolus for Scalp Irradiation Using Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Planning.

Introduction: In this study, we sought to develop a thermoplastic patient-specific helmet bolus that could deliver a uniform therapeutic dose to the target and minimize the dose to the normal brain during whole-scalp treatment with a humanoid head phantom. Methods: The bolus material was a commercial thermoplastic used for patient immobilization, and the holes in the netting were filled with melted paraffin. We compared volumetric-modulated arc therapy treatment plans with and without the bolus for quantitative dose distribution analysis. We analyzed the dose distribution in the region of interest to compare dose differences between target and normal organs. For quantitative analysis of treatment dose, OSLD chips were attached at the vertex (VX), posterior occipital (PO), right (RT), and left temporal (LT) locations. Results: The average dose in the clinical target volume was 6553.8 cGy (99.3%) with bolus and 5874 cGy (89%) without bolus, differing by more than 10% from the prescribed dose (6600 cGy) to the scalp target. For the normal brain, it was 3747.8 cGy (56.8%) with bolus and 5484.6 cGy (83.1%) without bolus. These results show that while the dose to the treatment target decreased, the average dose to the normal brain, which is mostly inside the treatment target, increased by more than 25%. With the bolus, the OSLD measured dose was 102.5 ± 1.2% for VX and 101.5 ± 1.9%, 95.9 ± 1.9%, and 81.8 ± 2.1% for PO, RT, and LT, respectively. In addition, the average dose in the treatment plan was 102%, 101%, 93.6%, and 80.7% for VX, PO, RT, and LT. When no bolus was administered, 59.6 ± 2.4%, 112.6 ± 1.8%, 47.1 ± 1.6%, and 53.1 ± 2.3% were assessed as OSLD doses for VX, PO, RT, and LT, respectively. Conclusion: This study proposed a method to fabricate patient-specific boluses that are highly reproducible, accessible, and easy to fabricate for radiotherapy to the entire scalp and can effectively spare normal tissue while delivering sufficient surface dose.

Surface dose measurement by optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter: A phantom study.

INTRODUCTION: Radiotherapy is the standard treatment for breast cancer patients after surgery. However, radiotherapy can cause side effects such as dry and moist desquamation of the patient's skin. The dose calculation from a treatment planning system (TPS) might also be inaccurate. The purpose of this study is to measure the surface dose on the CIRS thorax phantom by an optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter (OSLD). METHODS: The characteristics of OSLD were studied in terms of dose linearity, reproducibility, and angulation dependence on the solid water phantom. To determine the surface dose, OSLD (Landauer lnc., USA) was placed on 5 positions at the CIRS phantom (Tissue Simulation and Phantom Technology, USA). The five positions were at the tip, medial, lateral, tip-medial, and tip-lateral. Then, the doses from OSLD and TPS were compared. RESULTS: The dosimeter's characteristic test was good. The maximum dose at a depth of 15 mm was 514.46 cGy, which was at 100%. The minimum dose at the surface was 174.91 cGy, which was at 34%. The results revealed that the surface dose from TPS was less than the measurement. The percent dose difference was -2.17 ± 6.34, -12.08 ± 3.85, and -48.71 ± 1.29 at the tip, medial, and lateral positions, respectively. The surface dose from TPS at tip-medial and tip-lateral was higher than the measurement, which was 12.56 ± 5.55 and 10.45 ± 1.76 percent dose different, respectively. CONCLUSION: The percent dose difference is within the acceptable limit, except for the lateral position because of the body curvature. However, OSLD is convenient to assess the radiation dose, and further study is to measure in vivo. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: The OSL NanoDot dosimeter can be used for dose validation with a constant setup location. The measurement dose is higher than the dose from TPS, except for some tilt angles.

Dosimetric evaluation of a novel modular cell irradiation platform for multi-modality in vitro studies including high dose rate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: High dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy is integral for the treatment of numerous cancers. Preclinical studies involving HDR brachytherapy are limited. We aimed to describe a novel platform allowing multi-modality studies with clinical HDR brachytherapy and external beam irradiators, establish baseline dosimetry standard of a preclinical orthovoltage irradiator, to determine accurate dosimetric methods. METHODS: A dosimetric assessment of a commercial preclinical irradiator was performed establishing the baseline dosimetry goals for clinical irradiators. A 3D printed platform was then constructed with 14 brachytherapy channels at 1cm spacing to accommodate a standard tissue culture plate at a source-to-cell distance (SCD) of 1 cm or 0.4 cm. 4-Gy CT-based treatment plans were created in clinical treatment planning software and delivered to 96-well tissue culture plates using an Ir192 source or a clinical linear accelerator. Standard calculation models for HDR brachytherapy and external beam were compared to corresponding deterministic model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs). Agreement between predicted and measured dose was assessed with 2D-gamma passing rates to determine the best planning methodology. RESULTS: Mean (±standard deviation) and median dose measured across the plate for the preclinical irradiator was 423.7 ± 8.5 cGy and 430.0 cGy. Mean percentage differences between standard and MBDCA dose calculations were 9.4% (HDR, 1 cm SCD), 0.43% (HDR, 0.4 cm SCD), and 2.4% (EBRT). Predicted and measured dose agreement was highest for MBDCAs for all modalities. CONCLUSION: A 3D-printed tissue culture platform can be used for multi-modality irradiation studies with great accuracy. This tool will facilitate preclinical studies to reveal biologic differences between clinically relevant radiation modalities.

Staff radiation doses during Sentinel Lymph Node procedure of breast cancer from injection to surgeon.

The Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) or Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) technique involves various professionals from different departments in clinical settings to manage breast cancer patients properly. Tracing the nodular involvement of breast cancer patients requires radiation source Tc99m labeled with colloidal albumin to be injected at the tumor site. The patient becomes a radiation source for a sufficient time, which concerns the Nuclear Medicine (NM) and surgical staff. The study aims to provide the radiation doses of staff in the NM department during the SLN scintigraphy procedure and obtain an empirical model for calculating the radiation doses to staff in the surgical department from that particular patient. Radiation doses in SLN technique for breast cancer patients are minimal, and a sufficient number of SLN biopsy procedures can be performed by hospital staff within the category of non-radiation workers.

Dose-response dependencies of OSL dosimeters in conventional linacs and 1.5T MR-linacs: an experimental and Monte Carlo study.

Objective. This work focuses on the optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry (OSLD) dose-response characterization, with emphasis on 1.5T MR-Linacs.Approach. Throughout this study, the nanoDots OSLDs (Landauer, USA) were considered. In groups of three, the mean OSLD response was measured in a conventional linac and an MR-Linac under various irradiation conditions to investigate (i) dose-response linearity with and without the 1.5T magnetic field, (ii) signal fading rate and its dependencies, (iii) beam quality, detector orientation and dose rate dependencies in a conventional linac, (iii) potential MR imaging related effects on OSLD response and (iv) detector orientation dependence in an MR-Linac. Monte Carlo calculations were performed to further quantify angular dependence after rotating the detector around its central axis parallel to the magnetic field, and determine the magnetic field correction factors,kB,Q,for all cardinal detector orientations.Main results. OSLD dose-response supralinearity in an MR-Linac setting was found to agree within uncertainties with the corresponding one in a conventional linac, for the axial detector orientation investigated. Signal fading rate does not depend on irradiation conditions for the range of 3-30 d considered. OSLD angular (orientation) dependence is more pronounced under the presence of a magnetic field. OSLDs irradiated with and without real-time T2w MR imaging enabled during irradiation yielded the same response within uncertainties.kB,Qvalues were determined for all three cardinal orientations. Corrections needed reached up to 6.4%. However, if OSLDs are calibrated in the axial orientation and then irradiated in an MR-Linac placed again in the axial orientation (perpendicular to the magnetic field), then simulations suggest thatkB,Qcan be considered unity within uncertainties, irrespective of the incident beam angle.Significance. This work contributes towards OSLD dose-response characterization and relevant correction factors availability. OSLDs are suitable for QA checks in MR-based beam gating applications andin vivodosimetry in MR-Linacs.

Entrance Skin Dose (ESD) and Bucky Table Induced Backscattered Dose (BTI-BSD) in Abdominal Radiography With nanoDot Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter (OSLD).

In radiography, inconsistencies in patients' measured entrance skin dose (ESD) exist. There is no published research on the bucky table induced backscattered radiation dose (BTI-BSD). Thus, we aimed to ascertain ESD, calculate the BTI-BSD in abdominal radiography with a nanoDot OSLD, and compare the ESD results with the published data. A Kyoto Kagaku PBU-50 phantom (Kyoto, Japan) in an antero-posterior supine position was exposed, selecting a protocol used for abdominal radiography. The central ray of x-ray beam was pointed at the surface of abdomen at the navel, where a nanoDot dosimeter was placed to measure ESD. For the BTI-BSD, exit dose (ED) was determined by placing a second dosimeter on the exact opposite side (backside) of the phantom from the dosimeter used to determine (ESD) with and without bucky table at identical exposure parameters. The BTI-BSD was calculated as the difference between ED with and without bucky table. The ESD, ED, and BTI-BSD were measured in milligray (mGy). ESD mean values with and without bucky table were 1.97 mGy and 1.84 mGy, whereas ED values were 0.062 mGy and 0.052 mGy, respectively. Results show 2-26% lower ESD values with nanoDot OSLD. The BTI-BSD mean value was found to be approximately 0.01 mGy. A local dose reference level (LDRL) can be established using ESD data to safeguard patients from unnecessary radiation. In addition, to minimize the risk of BTI-BSD in patients in radiography, the search for the use or fabrication of a new, lower atomic number material for the bucky table is suggested.

Optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters for simultaneous measurement of point dose and dose-weighted LET in an adaptive proton therapy workflow.

Purpose: To demonstrate the suitability of optically stimulated luminescence detectors (OSLDs) for accurate simultaneous measurement of the absolute point dose and dose-weighted linear energy transfer (LETD) in an anthropomorphic phantom for experimental validation of daily adaptive proton therapy. Methods: A clinically realistic intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment plan was created based on a CT of an anthropomorphic head-and-neck phantom made of tissue-equivalent material. The IMPT plan was optimized with three fields to deliver a uniform dose to the target volume covering the OSLDs. Different scenarios representing inter-fractional anatomical changes were created by modifying the phantom. An online adaptive proton therapy workflow was used to recover the daily dose distribution and account for the applied geometry changes. To validate the adaptive workflow, measurements were performed by irradiating Al2O3:C OSLDs inside the phantom. In addition to the measurements, retrospective Monte Carlo simulations were performed to compare the absolute dose and dose-averaged LET (LETD) delivered to the OSLDs. Results: The online adaptive proton therapy workflow was shown to recover significant degradation in dose conformity resulting from large anatomical and positioning deviations from the reference plan. The Monte Carlo simulations were in close agreement with the OSLD measurements, with an average relative error of 1.4% for doses and 3.2% for LETD. The use of OSLDs for LET determination allowed for a correction for the ionization quenched response. Conclusion: The OSLDs appear to be an excellent detector for simultaneously assessing dose and LET distributions in proton irradiation of an anthropomorphic phantom. The OSLDs can be cut to almost any size and shape, making them ideal for in-phantom measurements to probe the radiation quality and dose in a predefined region of interest. Although we have presented the results obtained in the experimental validation of an adaptive proton therapy workflow, the same approach can be generalized and used for a variety of clinical innovations and workflow developments that require accurate assessment of point dose and/or average LET.

A direct comparison of the optically stimulated luminescent properties of BeO and Al2O3 for clinical in-vivo dosimetry.

Optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry is a relatively recent field of in-vivo dosimetry in clinical radiotherapy, developing over the last 20 years. As a pilot study, this paper presents a direct comparison between the sensitivity variance with use, stability of measurement and linearity of the current clinical standard Al2O3:C and a potential alternative, beryllium oxide. A set of ten optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLD), including five of each type, were used simultaneously and irradiated on a Versa HD linear accelerator. Having similar sensitivity, while Al2O3:C showed a relatively stable signal response from initial use, BeO was found to have a higher response to the same dose. However, BeO displayed a strong exponential decline from initial signal response following a model of [Formula: see text], reaching stability after approximately 10 irradiation cycles. BeO was shown to have potentially higher accuracy than Al2O3:C, with less variation between individual doses. Both OSLD showed good linearity between 0.2-5.0 Gy. Between these bounds, Al2O3:C demonstrated a strong linear response following the trend [Formula: see text], however beyond this showed deviation from linearity, resulting in a measured dose of [Formula: see text] Gy at 10.0 Gy dose delivery. BeO showed strong linearity across the full examined range of 0.2-10.0 Gy with following a model of [Formula: see text] Gy with a recorded dose at 10.0 Gy delivery as [Formula: see text] Gy. In conclusion, BeO does show large variance in sensitivity between individual OSLD and a considerable initial variance and decline in dose-response, however after pre-conditioning and individual normalisation to offset OSLD specific sensitivity BeO provides not only a viable alternative to Al2O3:C, but potentially provide higher accuracy, precision and reproducibility for in-vivo dosimetry.