Management of bone loss in acute severe open tibial fractures: a retrospective study of twenty nine cases-a treatment strategy with bone length preservation.

PURPOSE: The present study investigated the outcomes of bone loss associated with acute open tibial fractures classified as Gustilo-Anderson classification grade III B (GIIIB) using a bone length preservation strategy. METHODS: Among acute GIIIB open tibial fractures, 29 limbs of 29 patients requiring bone loss treatment were included. The reconstruction methods for bone loss were selected among the Masquelet technique (MT), bone transport (BT), acute shortening followed by gradual lengthening (ASGL), and free vascularized fibula graft (FVFG). Primary outcome measures were the rate of bone union and time to bone union. RESULTS: The median radiographic apparent bone gap (RABG) was 46.75 mm. Bone loss was treated with ASGL only in two patients in whom it was not possible to cover large soft tissue defects by a single free latissimus dorsi (LD) myocutaneous flap (with the serratus anterior (SA) muscle). The other 27 patients underwent soft tissue reconstruction and bone loss treatment with the preservation of bone length, including the MT for 23, BT for six, and FVFG for one. The bone union rate was 75.9%, and the median time to bone union was six months. Salvage surgeries were performed on all seven patients with nonunion; all of whom eventually achieved bony union. CONCLUSION: Bone loss associated with acute GIIIB open tibial fractures were treated with "bone length preservation" if the size of the soft tissue defect was less than the size that was covered by a single LD myocutaneous flap (with the SA muscle).

Limb salvage versus primary amputation in Gustilo-Anderson IIIB and IIIC tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The last systematic review on this topic was published in 2008. With advances in surgical techniques, patients with mangled extremities may now be potentially salvageable with comparable outcomes. This review aims to evaluate the outcomes of limb salvage compared to primary amputation in patients with severe open tibial fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL and CINAHL was performed from inception to 19 January 2022. The primary outcome was to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate pain, patient preference, quality of life, and patient preferences. Methodological quality was evaluated using the MINORS criteria. Pooled estimates of relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as a summary statistic for dichotomous variables and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS: Sixteen studies with 645 patients met inclusion criteria. The methodological quality was moderate based on the MINORS score. The majority were male. Mean age was 36.3 years. There was no significant differences in the length of hospitalization (n = 8), return to work rates (n = 9), return to sport rates (n = 4) and quality of life scores (n = 4). Patients with primary amputation had a significantly lower risk of total complications (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.53, p = 0.001) (n = 10), infections (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25-0.85, p = 0.01) (n = 9), and number of surgeries (MD - 4.17, 95% CI - 6.49 to - 1.85, p = 0.0004) (n = 6). Patients with primary amputation were able to ambulate significantly earlier (MD - 4.06, 95% CI - 7.65 to - 0.46, p = 0.03) (n = 3). Three studies found a significantly higher cost of hospitalization in limb salvage patients. Functional outcomes were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: While patients with primary amputation had better clinical outcomes in the short-term, functional outcomes were not significantly different in both groups. Despite the heterogenicity of the results in this review, surgeons need to contextualize the decision making for their patients and incorporate these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022303357.

Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing External Fixation to Intramedullary Nailing in the Treatment of Open Tibial Fractures.

Background: The purpose of this study was to collect all available randomized controlled trials (RCT) on the treatment of open tibial fractures with an external fixator (EF) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) for meta-analysis to provide reliable evidence-based data for clinical decision-making. Material and methods: The systematic review was undertaken in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Review). An electronic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was performed until 1 March 2023 to identify RCTs which compared either IMN or EF to fix the open tibial fracture. Outcome measures were: postoperative superficial and deep infection, time to union, delayed union, malunion, nonunion and hardware failure. In addition, pain and health-related quality of life were evaluated after 3 and 12 months of follow-up. Results: Sixteen publications comprising 1011 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results suggested that the IMN technique had a lower postoperative superficial infection and malunion rate (RR = 3.56, 95%CI = 2.56-4.95 and RR = 1.96, 95%CI = 1.12-3.44, respectively), but higher hardware failure occurrence in contrast to EF (RR = 0.30; 95%CI = 0.13-0.69). No significant differences were found in the union time, delayed union or nonunion rate, and postoperative deep infection rate between the treatments. Lower levels of pain were found in the EF group (RR = 0.05, 95%CI = 0.02-0.17, p < 0.001). A difference in quality of life favoring IMN after 3 months was found (RR = -0.04, 95%CI = -0.05-0.03, p < 0.001), however, no statistical difference was found after 12 months (RR = 0.03, 95%CI = -0.05-0.11, p = 0.44). Conclusions: Meta-analysis presented reduced incidence rates of superficial infection, malunion, and health-related quality of life 3 months after treatment in IMN. However, EF led to a significant reduction in pain and incidence rate of hardware failure. Postoperative deep infection, delayed union, nonunion and health-related quality of life 12 months following therapy were similar between groups. More high-quality RCTs should be conducted to provide reliable evidence-based data for clinical decision-making.

Combined medial gastrocnemius and hemisoleus flap: a reproducible alternative for open tibial fractures complicated with large or double soft tissue defects.

BACKGROUND: Utilization of combined local muscle flaps for Gustilo type IIIB open tibial fractures has not been clearly delineated. We describe a combination of medial gastrocnemius and hemisoleus flaps for managing open tibial fractures accompanying large or double soft tissue defects. METHODS: Twelve patients with Gustilo IIIB open fractures of the tibial shaft with large (9) or double (3) defects were operated on by fracture stabilization and combined medial gastrocnemius and hemisoleus flap coverage. Data were collected on types of implants, types of flaps, union time, postoperative complications, and Puno functional scores. RESULTS: Regarding implants for fixation, an intramedullary nail was used in three patients, plate and screws in five, combined plate and intramedullary nail in one, and definitive external fixation was used in three. Regarding soft tissue coverage, combined medial gastrocnemius and hemisoleus flaps were used in ten patients, combined hemigastrocnemius and hemisoleus in one, and combined medial gastrocnemius and reversed hemisoleus in one. All flaps survived, and all fractures were united with a mean union time of 19.7 weeks (range 16-24). Tip necrosis of the hemisoleus flap occurred in two patients. Regarding Puno functional score, one was determined to be excellent, nine was good and two was fair. CONCLUSION: Combined medial gastrocnemius and hemisoleus flaps are reliable and effective for open tibial fractures complicated with large or double soft tissue defects.

Our experience in the management of segmental bone defects caused by gunshots.

PURPOSE: Bone and soft-tissue defects in the leg can be caused by high-energy trauma. One of the causes of extensive bone defects are gunshot injuries. The incidence of these has been noticeably increasing in recent years in countries with political instabilities due to the random availability of weapons. The aim of this study is to focus on the essentials of treatment of post-gunshot tibial bone loss using the Ilizarov concept. METHODS: In the period between June 2011 and July 2013, 30 patients with open tibial fractures after gunshots comprised the present study with an average follow-up of 18 months. The bone defect was associated with soft-tissue loss in 18 cases. All cases were subjected to extensive debridement of all devitalized tissues back to the healthy bone with viable soft tissue coverage. All cases were treated by the Ilizarov external fixator using the bifocal bone transport technique. RESULTS: The overall bone results were satisfactory in 28 cases (93.3 %). The overall functional results were satisfactory in 22 cases (73.3 %). The bone end results were significantly affected by age and smoking, while the functional end results were significantly affected by smoking, the presence of infection at the time of presentation, and complications during the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Bone transport is a reliable method in the treatment of gunshot bone defects of the tibia after extensive debridement of all the devitalized tissues. The Ilizarov external fixator allows the functional use of the limb throughout the course of treatment, preventing disuse osteoporosis and increasing patient satisfaction.

Risk factors for infection in severe open tibial shaft fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate risk factors for infection in severe open tibial shaft fractures. METHODS: A secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective study investigated internal versus external fixation of severe open tibia fractures at 20 US Level I trauma centers. Adult patients, aged <65 years, with a Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIB or severe IIIA metaphyseal or diaphyseal tibia fracture were included. All fractures underwent definitive fixation with either a modern ring external fixator, intramedullary device, and/or plate. Fourteen variables previously identified as risk factors for infection were included in the analysis. Deep surgical site infection was defined as an infection treated with surgical debridement within 1 year of index surgery. RESULTS: The study cohort included 430 patients. Deep surgical site infection requiring reoperation occurred in 108 (25 %) patients. The final model identified four risk factors for infection: age >40 years (OR, 2.00; 95 % CI, 1.3-3.1), Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIB (OR, 1.80; 95 % CI, 1.1-3.0), embedded wound contamination (OR, 1.69; 95 % CI, 1.1-2.7), and wound length (OR, 1.02/cm; 95 % CI, 1.0-1.05). The model performed poorly at distinguishing infected from uninfected patients (Area Under the Curve=0.57; 95 % CI, 0.51-0.63). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons can now counsel patients with these risk factors that they are at a markedly higher risk of infection. The identification of these risk factors may direct future research aimed at mitigating the risk of deep surgical site infection in this patient population.

Estimating the economic impact of complications after open tibial fracture: A secondary analysis of the pilot Gentamicin Open Tibia trial (pGO-Tibia).

Objectives: To estimate the indirect economic impact of tibial fractures and their associated adverse events (AEs) in Tanzania. Design: A secondary analysis of the pilot Gentamicin Open (pGO)-Tibia randomized control trial estimating the indirect economic impact of suffering an AE, defined as a fracture-related infection (FRI) and/or nonunion, after an open tibial fracture in Tanzania. Setting: The pGO-Tibia trial was conducted from November 2019 to August 2021 at the Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Patients/Participants: One hundred adults with open tibial shaft fractures participated in this study. Intervention: Work hours were compared between AE groups. Cost data were analyzed using a weighted-average hourly wage and converted into purchasing power parity-adjusted USD. Main Outcome Measurements: Indirect economic impact was analyzed from the perspective of return to work (RTW), lost productivity, and other indirect economic and household costs. RTW was analyzed using a survival analysis. Results: Half of patients returned to work at 1-year follow-up, with those experiencing an AE having a significantly lower rate of RTW. Lost productivity was nearly double for those experiencing an AE. There was a significant difference in the mean outside health care costs between groups. The total mean indirect cost was $2385 with an AE, representing 92% of mean annual income and an increase of $1195 compared with no AE. There were significantly more patients with an AE who endorsed difficulty affording household expenses postinjury and who borrowed money to pay for their medical expenses. Conclusions: This study identified serious economic burden after tibial fractures, with significant differences in total indirect cost between those with and without an AE. Level of Evidence: II.

Monolateral external fixation versus internal fixation of Gustilo IIIB open tibial fractures: a multicenter comparative study.

PURPOSE: Gustilo IIIB open tibial fractures are associated with significant risks of complications particularly nonunion and fracture-related infections (FRI) due to the severity of the injuries. The commonly adopted viewpoint is that a Gustilo IIIB open tibial fracture is a relative contraindication for internal fixation. However, this study aims to assess the veracity of this viewpoint. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the definitive fixation technique on fracture nonunion and FRI rates in Gustilo IIIB open tibial fractures. In this study, we compared the rates of nonunion and FRI rates in grade IIIB open tibial fractures managed definitively with either mono-lateral external fixation or internal fixation. METHODS: The study was a multicenter retrospective comparative study undertaken in seven Nigerian tertiary hospitals. Following ethical approval, medical records of patients diagnosed with Gustilo IIIB open tibial fractures (between 2019 and 2021) were retrieved, patients who had a minimum of nine months of follow-up period and were found eligible had their relevant data entered into an online data collection form. Data obtained was analysed with SPSS version 23, and chi-square test was used to determine the statistical significance of differences observed between the two groups with regard to nonunion and FRI rates. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Out of a total of 47 eligible patients, 25 patients were managed definitively with mono-lateral external fixation whilst 22 patients were managed with internal fixation. Five of the 25 patients (20%) managed with external fixation had nonunion whilst two cases of nonunion were recorded amongst the 22 patients (9.1%) treated with internal fixation. The difference between the two techniques with regard to nonunion rates was not statistically significant (P = 0.295). 12 out of 25 patients (48%) in the external fixation group had FRIs whilst 6 out of 22 patients (27.3%) in the internal fixation group had FRIs. The rates of FRIs of the two groups were not significantly different (P = 0.145). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that mono-lateral external fixation and internal fixation do not differ significantly with respect to rates of nonunion and fracture-related infections in Gustilo IIIB open tibial fractures.

Nationwide study on open tibial fractures in the Netherlands: Incidence, demographics and level of hospital care.

OBJECTIVES: Open tibial fractures are relatively common injuries following traffic accidents. The vulnerability of the soft tissues surrounding the tibia increases the susceptibility to complications, including infection and nonunion. To minimize complications, a multidisciplinary, timely approach is crucial. To date, the Dutch incidence and level of hospital treatment remain unknown due to a lack of condition-specific nationwide registries. This study aimed to estimate the incidence and management of open tibial fractures in the Netherlands, providing essential information for public health policymaking and guideline development. METHODS: The 2018 and 2019 Dutch National Hospital Care Basic Registration data, provided by the Dutch Hospital Data Foundation, were utilized to identify all patients admitted to Dutch hospitals with tibial fractures. Incidence rates, patient demographics, primary diagnoses, fracture classification, level of hospital, and length of hospital stays were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: 1,079 ICD-10 codes for closed and open tibial fractures were identified in patients that were admitted to a Dutch hospital. Thirty-four percent were classified as open tibial fractures, accounting for an estimated incidence rate of 1.1 per 100,000 person-years (95 % CI 0.97-1.12). When categorized by age, the calculated incidence rate was higher in males for all age categories up until the age of 70. Notably, the overall highest incidence rate was found for females aged 90 and above (6.6 per 100,000 person-years). Open tibial fractures were predominantly treated in general or top clinical hospitals (comprising 69 % of open all tibia fractures). Notably, the minority (31 %) presented at university medical centers, all Level-1 trauma centers, equipped with orthoplastic teams. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to report the nationwide incidence rate of open tibial fractures in the Netherlands; 34 % of tibial fractures were registered as open. Notably, a limited proportion of open tibial fractures underwent treatment within Level-1 trauma centers. Consequently, in the majority of cases, the implementation of an orthoplastic team approach was unattainable. This study underscores the need for more comprehensive data collection to assess and improve the current treatment landscape.

Predictive factors for fracture-related infection in open tibial fractures in a Sub-Saharan African setting.

INTRODUCTION: The management of open tibial fractures (OTF) is challenging in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) where appropriate human resources and infrastructure (including equipment, implants and surgical supplies) are not readily available and medical care is not readily accessible. OTF are not rarely associated with a subsequent fracture-related infection (FRI), which is one of the most devastating and difficult to cure complications in orthopaedic trauma care. The aim of this study was to determine the rate and the predictive factors of FRI in OTF in a limited-resource setting of sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: Patients with OTF who underwent surgery from July 2015 to December 2020 and followed-up for at least 12 months in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Yaoundé (Cameroon) were retrospectively investigated. Diagnosis of FRI was based on the confirmatory criteria of the International FRI Consensus definition. All patients with bone infections, occurring at any time point during follow-up, were included. Logistic regression was used to determine the predictive factors for FRI. RESULTS: One hundred and five patients with OTF were studied. With a mean follow-up period of 29.5 ± 16.6 months, 33 patients (31.4%) presented with FRI. Gustilo-Anderson type of OTF, compliance with antibiotics, blood transfusion, time to first washing of the wounds and method of bone fixation were factors associated with the occurrence of FRI. In multivariable logistic regression, 6-hours delay to first washing of the wounds (OR=8.07, 95% CI: 1.43-45.31, p = 0.01), and compliance with antibiotics (OR=11.33, 95%CI: 1.11-115.6, p = 0.04) were the only independent predictors of FRI. CONCLUSION: The overall rate of FRI in open tibial fracture is still high in the sub-Saharan African context. For similar low-resources settings, this study supports the recommendations (1) to perform a very early washing-dressing-splinting of OTF on admission of the patient, (2) to administer antibiotics early, and (3) to perform surgery as soon as reasonably possible, once appropriate personnel, equipment, implants and surgical supplies are available.

Neglected war injuries: Reconstruction versus amputation.

INTRODUCTION: War injuries are remarkably different situations with profound severity and significant contamination compared to civilian injuries. Delayed definitive management makes the situation much more complicated. This study aimed to report the outcomes of limb reconstruction of neglected war injuries with a previous decision of amputation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2010 to 2021, 1104 patients with war-related fractures from conflict-zone countries were referred to our center including 589 open tibial fractures. Of these tibial fractures, amputation had already been decided in 54 cases, and the patients were looking for a trial of reconstruction and avoiding amputation. These cases were included in the current study. The treatment approach was a single-stage procedure with bone and soft tissue reconstruction. RESULTS: This study included 54 male patients with a mean age of 26.3 years. Infection was the predominant feature in 43 cases (79.6 %). CT angiography revealed a one-vessel limb in 17 patients. Peripheral nerve injuries affected 15 patients. The mean time from injury to presentation was 8.5 weeks. The bone gap (2-13 cm) was evident in 44 cases. In four cases, the contralateral limb was amputated below the knee. There were associated injuries in nine cases. Rotational flap coverage was done in the same setting for 19 legs. Gastrocnemius flap was done in two cases. The mean follow-up duration was 45.1 months. The treatment methods included bifocal management (33 cases), trifocal management (17 cases), fibular transfer (two cases), and a mono-focal approach in two cases. All fractures healed successfully. The mean external fixation period was 7.6 months. Recurrence of infection occurred in three patients. A non-displaced refracture developed in one case. Five cases had a residual angular deformity. Eventually, the ASAMI bone and functional results were good in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Neglected war injuries constitute a complex problem where amputation may be indicated. Our approach includes one-stage limb reconstruction with the corticotomy-first technique, conservative debridement of the docking site, concomitant osteoplastic procedure, and gradual distraction to tackle all the aspects of the problem. The good results obtained in the presented series make it a valid approach to avoid amputation in neglected war injuries.

Tibial bone and soft-tissue concentrations following combination therapy with vancomycin and meropenem - evaluated by microdialysis in a porcine model : should patients with open fractures have higher doses of antibiotics?

AIMS: Prompt and sufficient broad-spectrum empirical antibiotic treatment is key to preventing infection following open tibial fractures. Succeeding co-administration, we dynamically assessed the time for which vancomycin and meropenem concentrations were above relevant epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) minimal inhibitory concentrations (T > MIC) in tibial compartments for the bacteria most frequently encountered in open fractures. Low and high MIC targets were applied: 1 and 4 µg/ml for vancomycin, and 0.125 and 2 µg/ml for meropenem. METHODS: Eight pigs received a single dose of 1,000 mg vancomycin and 1,000 mg meropenem simultaneously over 100 minutes and 10 minutes, respectively. Microdialysis catheters were placed for sampling over eight hours in tibial cancellous bone, cortical bone, and adjacent subcutaneous adipose tissue. Venous blood samples were collected as references. RESULTS: Across the targeted ECOFF values, vancomycin displayed longer T > MIC in all the investigated compartments in comparison to meropenem. For both drugs, cortical bone exhibited the shortest T > MIC. For the low MIC targets and across compartments, mean T > MIC ranged between 208 and 449 minutes (46% to 100%) for vancomycin and between 189 and 406 minutes (42% to 90%) for meropenem. For the high MIC targets, mean T > MIC ranged between 30 and 446 minutes (7% to 99%) for vancomycin and between 45 and 181 minutes (10% to 40%) for meropenem. CONCLUSION: The differences in the T > MIC between the low and high targets illustrate how the interpretation of these results is highly susceptible to the defined MIC target. To encompass any trauma, contamination, or individual tissue differences, a more aggressive dosing approach may be considered to achieve longer T > MIC in all the exposed tissues, and thereby lower the risk of acquiring an infection after open tibial fractures. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(2):112-120.

Single-stage "Fix and Flap" gives Good Outcomes in Grade 3B/C Open Tibial Fractures: A Prospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Grade 3B/C open tibial fractures with grossly contaminated degloving injuries have poor outcomes, with or without vascular injuries. Treatment decision oscillates between limb salvage and amputation. The standard protocol of repeated debridement and delayed wound cover is a challenge in developing countries due to overcrowded emergencies and limited operating room availability. We present results of our modified protocol involving primary stabilisation with external fixation and immediate wound cover as an aggressive modality of treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with severe open tibial shaft fractures were managed using a standardised protocol of emergent debridement, external fixation and immediate wound cover with free distant/local rotational muscle flaps and fasciocutaneous flaps, and with vascular repair in Grade 3C fractures. Intra-articular fractures were excluded. Patients were followed for a minimum of three years, with an assessment of clinical, radiological and functional outcomes. RESULTS: Wound cover was achieved with 24 distant free muscle flaps, four local rotational muscle flaps and five fasciocutaneous flaps. All fractures united with an average time to union of 40.3 weeks (16-88). Fifteen patients (45.4%) underwent only a single major surgery using primary definitive external fixation. Deep infection was seen in four patients (12.1%). Nineteen patients had excellent to good outcomes, six were fair, and eight were poor. CONCLUSION: "Fix and Flap" in the same sitting, using immediate wound cover and external fixation, has given good results in our hands despite the delayed presentation, the neurovascular deficit and the degloving injury. This may be a better management strategy in overcrowded tertiary care centres of developing countries, with a single surgical procedure in almost half the cases.

Successful treatment of an open tibial fracture in a 102-year-old woman: a case report.

Introduction: As the average life expectancy is increasing, the number of patients aged >100 years who have fragility fractures will increase in the future. In female patients, the incidence of open fractures increases with age. Case Presentation: We present the case of a 102-year-old woman with open tibial and fibular diaphyseal fractures (Gustilo-Anderson classification type IIIb) treated with temporary external fixation, advancement flap, and negative pressure wound therapy in the first-stage surgery and treatment, and open reduction and internal fixation with skin grafting in the second-stage surgery. Open wound and bone healing were attained. Conclusion: Surgery should not be denied on the basis of age alone. Medical evaluation should focus on identifying risk factors, assessing risk in detail, optimizing status, predicting complications, and making the appropriate surgical plan for the patient status. Moreover, in the present case, meticulous postoperative management was the main reason for the successful surgical treatment.

[Surgical decision pattern in the prescription of MESS-scale amputations in tibia fractures exposed grade III-B Gustilo-Anderson]. / Patrón de decisión quirúrgica en la prescripción de amputaciones con escala MESS en fracturas de tibia expuesta grado III-B Gustilo-Anderson.

INTRODUCTION: The management of severely traumatized extremity continues to be a matter of debate. Gustilo-Anderson tibial fractures III-B have a wide spectrum of variants, there are no guidelines using this classification for management. MESS has demonstrated functional and prognostic association. OBJECTIVE: To identify the pattern of decision made by surgeons for the prescription of amputations in tibial fractures exposed grade III-B Gustilo-Anderson with MESS scale. Material and methods. RESULTS: There was no association between the variables, with the application of MESS. (2 = 1.28, p = 0.2575). Surgeons of more than 10 years, increased once the possibility of matching the result of experts (OR = 2.088, 95% CI) (p = 0.0066). CONCLUSION: Academic degrees, surgical experience, and frequent clinical practice do not influence the correct application of the MESS scale. Surgeons with more than 10 years of experience have doubled the possibility of a precise decision.

INTRODUCCIÓN: El manejo de la extremidad severamente traumatizada continúa siendo materia de debate. Las fracturas de tibia III-B de Gustilo-Anderson tienen un amplio espectro de variantes, no hay guías mediante esta clasificación para un manejo. MESS ha demostrado asociación funcional y pronóstica. OBJETIVO: Identificar el patrón de decisión por parte de los cirujanos para la prescripción de amputaciones en fracturas de tibia expuesta grado IIIB Gustilo-Anderson con escala MESS. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Es un estudio descriptivo, observacional, prospectivo, transversal y analítico. Se evaluaron 131 ortopedistas de un centro de referencia de patología traumática, quienes con uso de la escala MESS evaluaron 10 casos clínicos representativos de fracturas de tibia expuesta grado III-B de Gustilo-Anderson presentados en dispositivo electrónico. Se evaluó la concordancia de las decisiones entre cirujanos que laboran y expertos. Se realizó análisis inferencial mediante 2 (p 0.05) de las variables del estudio: experiencia del cirujano, postgrados académicos, práctica clínica frecuente de amputaciones, concordancia de las decisiones con escala MESS con respecto al patrón de prescripción obtenido por expertos. RESULTADOS: No se encontró asociación entre las variables con la aplicación de MESS (2 = 1.28, p = 0.2575). Los cirujanos de más de 10 años incrementaron una vez la posibilidad de coincidir con el resultado de expertos (OR = 2.088, IC 95%) (p = 0.0066). CONCLUSIÓN: Las variables como postgrados académicos, experiencia quirúrgica y práctica clínica frecuente no influyen en la correcta aplicación de la escala MESS. Los cirujanos de más de 10 años de experiencia incrementaron al doble la posibilidad de una decisión precisa.

Complications of Open Tibial Fracture Management: Risk Factors and Treatment.

Open tibial fractures result in high rates of complications. This study aims to elucidate the risk factors causing these complications, and suggest antimicrobial regimens based on the organisms grown in post-operative infections. Over a period of five years, 173 patients had sustained open tibial fractures and undergone operative treatment at a single institution. All surgical data was gathered retrospectively through online medical records. Thirty-one patients (17.9%) had sustained post-operative bony complications, while infective complications were reported in 37 patients (21.4%). Patients with Gustilo type III fractures were found to be more than three times as likely to sustain post-operative infective (p=0.007) or bony (p=0.015) complications, compared to Gustilo type I or II fractures. The fracture location and time taken to fixation did not significantly affect the complication rate, but results were trending towards significance. The commonest cause of infective complications were hospital-acquired organisms, such as Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (40.5%). Closer monitoring of patients sustaining high grade Gustilo open fractures, as well as antimicrobial prophylaxis for both hospital-acquired organisms and environmental contaminants, will result in the best outcome for patients. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted, to determine the significance of fracture location and time taken to fixation on complication rates.

Economics of open tibial fractures: the pivotal role of length-of-stay and infection.

In order to define strategies to curb the continuing increase in healthcare costs, we describe the cost breakdown of open tibial fractures. Twenty-seven clinical and process variables were recorded retrospectively, and five main hospital related cost categories were defined. Three multivariate linear models were fitted to the data. Total healthcare costs of open tibial fractures were almost twice as high compared to closed fractures and mainly existed of hospitalization costs. Length-of-stay (LOS) was found to be the most important variable driving the healthcare costs of open tibial fractures. Deep infection lead to a 6-fold increase of LOS and 5-fold increase in total healthcare costs of open tibial fractures. Therefore, appropriate international consensus guidelines are required to improve not only the patient outcome (infection prevention) but also reduce overall healthcare cost by focusing on reducing the LOS.

Unreamed Intramedullary Nailing is a better alternative than External Fixator for Gustilo grade IIIB Tibial Fractures based on a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There remains a controversy between unreamed intramedullary nailing and external fixation to treat Gustilo grade IIIB tibial fractures. To evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safeness of both methods for this type of fracture, we performed this meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant original studies were searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Cochrane Central Database (all through February 2014). Studies included in this meta-analysis had to compare the effectiveness or complications and provided sufficient data of interest. The patients treated by both methods were similar statistically in demography and injury mechanism. The Stata 11.0 was used to analyze all data. RESULTS: Six studies involving 163 participants were included. Unreamed intramedullary nailing was associated with reduced time to union (standardized mean difference, -1.14; 95% confidence interval, -2.04 to -0.24) and lower rates of superficial infection (odds ratio: 0.39; 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.87) and malunion (odds ratio: 0.27; 95% confidence interval: 0.09-0.78). However, there were no significant differences in other adverse events including delayed union, non-union, deep infection, and fixation failure. CONCLUSION: The existing evidence supports unreamed intramedullary nailing to be a better method for treating Gustilo grade IIIB tibial fractures, and this might aid in the management of this sever injury.

Patrón de decisión quirúrgica en la prescripción de amputaciones con escala MESS en fracturas de tibia expuesta grado III-B Gustilo-Anderson / Surgical decision pattern in the prescription of MESS-scale amputations in tibia fractures exposed grade III-B Gustilo-Anderson

Resumen: Introducción: El manejo de la extremidad severamente traumatizada continúa siendo materia de debate. Las fracturas de tibia III-B de Gustilo-Anderson tienen un amplio espectro de variantes, no hay guías mediante esta clasificación para un manejo. MESS ha demostrado asociación funcional y pronóstica. Objetivo: Identificar el patrón de decisión por parte de los cirujanos para la prescripción de amputaciones en fracturas de tibia expuesta grado IIIB Gustilo-Anderson con escala MESS. Material y métodos: Es un estudio descriptivo, observacional, prospectivo, transversal y analítico. Se evaluaron 131 ortopedistas de un centro de referencia de patología traumática, quienes con uso de la escala MESS evaluaron 10 casos clínicos representativos de fracturas de tibia expuesta grado III-B de Gustilo-Anderson presentados en dispositivo electrónico. Se evaluó la concordancia de las decisiones entre cirujanos que laboran y expertos. Se realizó análisis inferencial mediante χ2 (p < 0.05) de las variables del estudio: experiencia del cirujano, postgrados académicos, práctica clínica frecuente de amputaciones, concordancia de las decisiones con escala MESS con respecto al patrón de prescripción obtenido por expertos. Resultados: No se encontró asociación entre las variables con la aplicación de MESS (χ2 = 1.28, p = 0.2575). Los cirujanos de más de 10 años incrementaron una vez la posibilidad de coincidir con el resultado de expertos (OR = 2.088, IC 95%) (p = 0.0066). Conclusión: Las variables como postgrados académicos, experiencia quirúrgica y práctica clínica frecuente no influyen en la correcta aplicación de la escala MESS. Los cirujanos de más de 10 años de experiencia incrementaron al doble la posibilidad de una decisión precisa.

Abstract: Introduction: The management of severely traumatized extremity continues to be a matter of debate. Gustilo-Anderson tibial fractures III-B have a wide spectrum of variants, there are no guidelines using this classification for management. MESS has demonstrated functional and prognostic association. Objective: To identify the pattern of decision made by surgeons for the prescription of amputations in tibial fractures exposed grade III-B Gustilo-Anderson with MESS scale. Material and methods: This is a descriptive, observational, prospective, transversal, analytical study. One hundred thirty-one orthopedists from a traumatic pathology referral center were evaluated, using the MESS scale to evaluate 10 representative clinical cases of Gustilo-Anderson grade III-B tibial fractures presented in an electronic device. The concordance of the decisions between working surgeons and experts was evaluated. Inferential analysis was performed using the χ2 (p < 0.05) of the study variables: surgeon experience, academic postgraduate studies, frequent clinical practice of amputations, concordance of decisions with MESS scale with respect to the prescription pattern obtained by experts. Results: There was no association between the variables, with the application of MESS. (χ2 = 1.28, p = 0.2575). Surgeons of more than 10 years, increased once the possibility of matching the result of experts (OR = 2.088, 95% CI) (p = 0.0066). Conclusion: Academic degrees, surgical experience, and frequent clinical practice do not influence the correct application of the MESS scale. Surgeons with more than 10 years of experience have doubled the possibility of a precise decision.