Defining the Disparity: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Factors Associated With Decreased Resident Operative Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Technical learning in surgical training is multifaceted and existing literature suggests a positive relationship between case volume and proficiency. Little is known about factors associated with a decreased volume of operative experience. This study aimed to identify resident and program factors associated with general surgery residents (GSR) in the bottom quartile of logged case volume upon program completion. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of a multicenter study was used to examine case logs for categorical GSR. Participants included graduates between 2010 and 2020 from 20 programs. Residents below and above the 25th percentile for total operative volume were compared. RESULTS: The present study includes 1343 GSR who graduated over the 11-y period. In total, 336 residents were below the 25th percentile and 1007 residents were above the 25th percentile. Those below the 25th percentile were more likely to be female (41% versus 34%, P = 0.02), identify as underrepresented in medicine (22% versus 14%, P < 0.01), and pursue fellowship (86% versus 80%, P = 0.01) compared to those above the 25th percentile. Residents below the 25th percentile were more likely to have graduated from a low volume program (55% versus 25%, P < 0.01) and from top National Institutes of Health funded institutions (57% versus 52%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified individual and program characteristics associated with lower operative volume of GSR. Understanding such characteristics will aid surgical educators to achieve better equity in training.

Examining the Influence of a General Surgery Resident's Transplant Experience on Their Pursuit of Transplant Surgery Fellowship.

BACKGROUND: Transplant surgery has historically been a less desirable fellowship among general surgery graduates. Limited work has been done to understand factors associated with residents' interest in transplantation. Using a multi-institutional cohort, we examined how the resident experience on transplant surgery may influence their decision to pursue transplant fellowship. METHODS: Individual demographics, program characteristics, and transplant-specific case logs were collected for graduates from 2010 to 2020 at 20 general surgery residency programs within the US Resident OPerative Experience (ROPE) Consortium. Residents who pursued transplant surgery fellowship were compared to those who went directly into practice or pursued a non-transplant fellowship. RESULTS: Among 1342 general surgery graduates, 52 (3.9%) pursued abdominal transplant fellowship. These residents completed more transplant (22 vs. 9), liver (14 vs. 9), pancreas (15 vs. 11), and vascular access operations (38 vs. 30) compared to residents who did not pursue transplant fellowship (all p < 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression found that residents underrepresented in medicine were three times more likely (95% CI 1.54-6.58, p < 0.01) and residents at a program co-located with a transplant fellowship six times more likely (95% CI 1.95-18.18, p < 0.01) to pursue transplant fellowship. Additionally, a resident's increasing total transplant operative volume was associated with an increased likelihood of pursuing a transplant fellowship (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.09-1.14, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The findings from this multi-institutional study demonstrate that increased exposure to transplant operations and interaction within a transplant training program is associated with a resident's pursuit of transplant surgery fellowship. Efforts to increase operative exposure, case participation, and mentorship may optimize the resident experience and promote the transplant surgery pipeline.

Surgical decompressions for cauda equina syndrome during COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The novel coronarvirus disease (COVID-19) has had a major impact on provision of spinal neurosurgery across the world, especially in the UK, with a significant fall in operating and patient volumes, and elective clinical activities. It is unclear whether the pandemic has affected the volume of urgent spinal procedures in the UK, especially surgical decompressions for cauda equina syndrome (CES). METHODS: Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis of theatre records and electronic operation notes at our institution to identify all procedures performed for CES before (December 2019 to February 2020) and during (March 2020 to May 2020) the COVID-19 pandemic. Statistical analyses were performed on SPSS v22 (IBM). RESULTS: Forty-four patients underwent surgical decompressions during the study period. Over half (54.5%) were female and the median age was 45 years (range = 22-78 years). Three in four procedures were performed at L4-5 and L5-S1 levels (79.5%). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of decompressions performed each month [χ2(5)=1.818; p = 0.874]. On the other hand, the number of referrals for suspected or confirmed CES fell by 81.8% between December 2019 and April 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Our results did not show any statistically significant decline in the volume of surgical decompressions performed for CES despite the considerable fall in electronic referrals for CES and degenerative spinal conditions. This suggests that patients with critical neurological symptoms continued to present and were treated appropriately despite the restrictions imposed on spinal surgeons during the pandemic.

Extirpative renal surgery volume in training: different roads to the (same?) destination.

PURPOSE: To describe the overall extirpative renal surgery (ERS) training volume reported by PU and PS. METHODS: Case log data from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) was examined from 2013-2016 for surgery residents (Sres), urology residents (Ures), pediatric surgery fellows (PSfel) and pediatric urology fellows (PUfel). Case log information for all levels of participation over all case categories that could potentially offer ERS volume were recorded. Volume was estimated using the mean number of included cases during residency and fellowship and the sum was used to estimate total training volume. Volume between groups was compared using the student's t test. RESULTS: Case logs were included for 4447 residents (4259 Sres, 840 Ures) and fellows (188 PSfel, 71 PUfel). Mean PU volume was 113.1, which was higher than the mean PS volume of 10.3 (p < 0.001). For PU, more ERS were performed during residency than fellowship (p < 0.001). For PS the opposite was true (p < 0.001). When examining fellow training only, PUfel performed more ERS than PSfel (11.7 vs. 7.0 p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: While previous publications note similar short-term outcomes for ERS for malignancy for PU and PS, ERS case volume during training is significantly different. Review of recent ACGME data indicate that PU have more overall experience with ERS, with most gained during residency. Additionally, PUfel performed significantly more ERS than PSfel. Further study into how these training differences affect long-term outcomes is necessary.

Canadian Plastic Surgery Resident Operative Experience in Hand Surgery.

PURPOSE: Core procedural competencies (CPCs) in hand surgery have been previously described. However, it is unknown whether plastic surgery residents receive sufficient operative experience with these procedures. This study aimed to determine whether Canadian plastic surgery residents are receiving adequate exposure to CPCs in hand surgery during residency training. METHODS: Hand surgery case logs recorded by graduating plastic surgery residents at 10 Canadian English-speaking training programs between 2004 and 2014 were reviewed from 3 databases. For each CPC in hand surgery, perceived resident role and self-competence scores were collected and analyzed. Core procedural competencies encompass core essential procedural competencies (CEPCs) and nonessential procedural competencies. RESULTS: There were 55 graduating plastic surgery residents included in the study. A total of 14,909 procedures were logged for 42 CPCs, with an average of 271 procedures/resident. When grouped by subdomain within hand surgery, procedures with the most exposure were related to traumatic finger injuries (29%) and neuropathies (22%). The least common procedures were related to flap reconstructions (0.3%) and muscle release (0.1%). Many residents reported receiving no operative experience (range, 2% to 100%) or between 1 and 10 cases of CEPCs (range, 7% to 50%). Most graduating residents (58% to 72%) did not feel competent independently performing 60% of the most common procedures. There were weak to moderate correlations between role and self-competence, and between postgraduate year and self-competence. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, many plastic surgery residents graduate from training programs with little to no exposure for over half of the CEPCs in hand surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Given the great diversity in hand surgery CPCs, it is difficult for residents to gain adequate operative experience during their residency in all of the CPCs.

Effect of an additional neurosurgical resident on procedure length, operating room time, estimated blood loss, and post-operative length-of-stay.

Introduction: Neurosurgical residency training is costly, with expenses largely borne by the academic institutions that train residents. One expense is increased operative duration, which leads to poorer patient outcomes. Although other studies have assessed the effect of one resident assisting, none have investigated two residents; thus, we sought to investigate if two residents versus one scrubbed-in impacted operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and length-of-stay (LOS).Methods: In this retrospective review of patients who underwent a neurosurgical procedure involving one or two residents between January 2013 and April 2016, we performed multivariable linear regression to determine if there was an association between resident participation and case length, operating room time, EBL, and LOS. We also included patient demographics, attending surgeon, day of the week, start time, pre-operative LOS, procedure performed, and other variables in our model. Only procedures performed at least 40 times during the study period were analyzed.Results: Of 860 procedures that met study criteria, 492 operations were one of six procedures performed at least 40 times, which were anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt insertion, CSF shunt revision, lumbar laminectomy, intracranial hematoma evacuation, and non-skull base, supratentorial parenchymal brain tumor resection. An additional resident was associated with a 35.1-min decrease (p = .01) in operative duration for lumbar laminectomies. However, for intracranial hematoma evacuations, an extra resident was associated with a 24.1 min increase (p = .03) in procedural length. There were no significant differences observed in the other four surgeries.Conclusion: An additional resident may lengthen duration of intracranial hematoma evacuations. However, two residents scrubbed-in were associated with decreased lumbar laminectomy duration. Overall, an extra resident does not increase procedural duration, total operating room utilization, EBL, or post-operative LOS. Allowing two residents to scrub in may be a safe and cost-effective method of educating neurosurgical residents.

Put Me in the Game Coach! Resident Participation in High-risk Surgery in the Era of Big Data.

BACKGROUND: With the emphasis on quality metrics guiding reimbursement, concerns have emerged regarding resident participation in patient care. This study aimed to evaluate whether resident participation in high-risk elective general surgery procedures is safe. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2005-2012) was used to identify patients undergoing one of five high-risk general surgery procedures. Resident and nonresident groups were created using a 2:1 propensity score match. Postoperative outcomes were calculated using univariate statistics and multivariable logistic regression for the two groups. Predictors of mortality and morbidity were identified using machine learning in the form of decision trees. RESULTS: Twenty-five thousand three hundred sixty three patients met our inclusion criteria. Following matching, each group contained 500 patients and was comparable for matched characteristics. Thirty-day mortality was similar between the groups (2.4% versus 2.6%; P = 0.839). Deep surgical site infection (0% versus 1.6%; P = 0.005), urinary tract infection (5% versus 2.5%; P = 0.029), and operative time (275.6 min versus 250 min; P = 0.0064) were significantly higher with resident participation. Resident participation was not predictive of mortality or complications, while age, American society of anesthesiologists class, and functional status were leading predictors of both. CONCLUSIONS: Despite growing time constraints and pressure to perform, surgical resident participation remains safe. Residents should be given active roles in the operating room, even in the most challenging cases.

The current standard of Foot and Ankle Fellowship in the UK.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the current standards of Fellowship training in Foot and Ankle Surgery Fellowship in the UK. METHODS: Thirteen UK post-FRCS (Tr&Orth) or equivalent Fellows completed a questionnaire detailing their outpatient, surgical, teaching and research experience, along with documenting their supervision and terms of employment. RESULTS: A Fellow attended a mean of 2.5 (0.5-4) clinics and 3.84 (2-7) theatre sessions per week. 62% of Fellows had independent clinics. The three largest sub-specialty areas experienced were forefoot surgery, mid or/hindfoot arthritis and deformity correction. 82% of Fellows had a regular MDT meeting. All were involved in both teaching and research, but only 64% had timetabled research sessions. All Fellows were satisfied with their experience and would recommended the Fellowship. CONCLUSIONS: The current standard of a post FRCS (Tr&Orth) Fellowship in Foot & Ankle surgery in the UK has been defined. Further improvement will require all Fellows to be involved in a regular MDT meetings, work in an independent clinic, have guaranteed timetabled research time and a ring fenced study leave budget.

Patients' views on priority setting in neurosurgery: A qualitative study.

OBJECT: Accountability for Reasonableness is an ethical framework which has been implemented in various health care systems to improve and evaluate the fairness of priority setting. This framework is grounded on four mandatory conditions: relevance, publicity, appeals, and enforcement. There have been few studies which have evaluated the patient stakeholders' acceptance of this framework; certainly no studies have been done on patients' views on the prioritization system for allocating patients for operating time in a system with pressure on the resource of inpatient beds. The aim of this study is to examine neurosurgical patients' views on the prioritization of patients for operating theater (OT) time on a daily basis at a tertiary and quaternary referral neurosurgery center. METHODS: Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with thirty-seven patients, recruited from the neurosurgery clinic at Toronto Western Hospital. Family members and friends who accompanied the patient to their clinic visit were encouraged to contribute to the discussion. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and subjected to thematic analysis using open and axial coding. RESULTS: Overall, patients are supportive of the concept of a priority-setting system based on fairness, but felt that a few changes would help to improve the fairness of the current system. These changes include lowering the level of priority given to volume-funded cases and providing scheduled surgeries that were previously canceled a higher level of prioritization. Good communication, early notification, and rescheduling canceled surgeries as soon as possible were important factors that directly reflected the patients' confidence level in their doctor, the hospital, and the health care system. CONCLUSION: This study is the first clinical qualitative study of patients' perspective on a prioritization system used for allocating neurosurgical patients for OT time on a daily basis in a socialized not-for-profit health care system with fixed resources.

Decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty: experience and outcomes in deployed UK military personnel.

OBJECT: In recent conflicts, many UK personnel sustained head injuries requiring damage-control surgery and aeromedical transfer to the UK. This study aims to examine indications, complications and outcomes of UK military casualties undergoing craniectomy and cranioplasty from conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. METHODS: The UK military Joint Theatre Trauma Registry (JTTR) was searched for all UK survivors in Afghanistan and Iraq between 2004 and 2014 requiring craniectomy and cranioplasty resulting from trauma. RESULTS: Fourteen decompressive craniectomies and cranioplasties were performed with blast and gunshot wounds equally responsible for head injury. Ten survivors (71%) had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 75, normally designated as 'unsurvivable'. Most were operated on the day of injury. Seventy-one percent received a reverse question mark incision and 7% received a bicoronal incision. Seventy-nine percent had bone flaps discarded. Overall infection rate was 43%. Acinetobacter spp was the causative organism in 50% of cases. Median Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at final follow-up was 4. All casualties had a GOS score greater than 3. CONCLUSIONS: Timely neurosurgical intervention is imperative for military personnel given high survival rates in those sustaining what are designated 'un-survivable' injuries. Early decompression facilitates safe aeromedical evacuation of casualties. Excellent outcomes validate the UK military trauma system and the stepwise performance gains throughout recent conflicts however trauma registers most evolving to have specific relevance to military casualties. In high-energy trauma with contamination and soft-tissue destruction, surgery should be conducted with regard for future soft tissue reconstruction. Bone flaps should be discarded and cranioplasty performed according to local preference. Facilities receiving military casualties should have specialist microbiological input mindful of the difficulties treating unusual microbes.

Removal of a penetrating orbital and anterior fossa foreign body using an eyebrow incision.

In this case, we present an underutilised eyebrow approach for removing penetrating foreign bodies of the orbit extending into the anterior fossa floor. Excellent visualisation of the sub-frontal region is achieved and a large trauma craniotomy is avoided, but care must be taken to preserve the supra-orbital and fronto-temporal nerves.

Resident perspectives on the role of gender in operative experience during general surgery residency training: A mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear why female general surgery residents perform fewer cases than male peers. This exploratory study investigated possible contributors to gender-based disparities and solutions for improving equity in operative experience. METHODS: Surveys, including Likert scale and free-text questions, were distributed to 21 accredited general surgery residency programs. RESULTS: There were 96 respondents, of whom 69% were female. 22% of females personally experienced barriers to operative experience versus 13% of males (p â€‹= â€‹0.41), while 52% of female residents believed operative training was affected by gender (p â€‹= â€‹0.004). Inductive analysis revealed the most common barrier to operating room participation was floor work/clinical tasks. The most common barrier for female residents was perceived sexism/gender bias, with subthemes of "misidentification," "feeling unwelcome," and "poor trust/autonomy." To improve parity, residents proposed structured program-level review, feedback, and transparent expectations about case assignments. CONCLUSION: Female general surgery residents believe gender bias impacts training. Further mixed-methods research is crucial to determine the cause of gender-based disparities in operative experience.

Factors Influencing Exam Performance of Surgical Trainees in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Retrospective Analysis of the College of Surgeons in East, Central, and Southern Africa Membership Examination.

INTRODUCTION: The College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA) has been expanding surgical training in sub-Saharan Africa to respond to the shortage in the region. However, acquiring surgical skills requires rigorous training, and these skills are repeatedly assessed throughout training. Therefore, understanding the factors influencing these assessments is crucial. Previous research has identified individual characteristics, educational background, curriculum structure and previous exam outcomes to influence performance. However, COSECSA's Membership of the College of Surgeons (MCS) exam has not been investigated for factors influencing performance, which this study aims to investigate. METHODS: Data from MCS trainees who took the exam between 2015 and 2021 were analyzed. Trainee demographics, institutional affiliation, operative experience, and exam performance were considered. Linear regression models were used to analyze the factors related to written and clinical exam performance. RESULTS: Out of 354 trainees, 228 were included in the study. Factors such as training duration, the ratio of emergency surgeries, institutional funding source, and country language were associated with written exam performance. Training duration, funding source, exposure to major surgeries, and the ratio of performing operations were significant factors for the clinical exam. DISCUSSION: Operative experience, institutional affiliation, training duration, and language proficiency influence exam performance. Hospitals funded by faith-based organizations or nongovernmental organizations had trainees with higher scores. Prolonged training did not guarantee improved performance. Lastly, having English as an official language improved written exam scores. Gender and country of training did not significantly impact performance. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of operative experience, institutional affiliation, and language proficiency in the exam performance of surgical trainees in COSECSA. Interventions to enhance surgical training and improve exam outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa should consider these factors. Further research is needed to explore additional outcome measures and gather comprehensive data on trainee and hospital characteristics.

Creation of an Application to Increase Surgical Resident Operative Case Coverage.

PURPOSE: Studies have shown that the confidence of surgical residents to perform procedures after completing residency can be affected by their volume of operative experiences. Many surgical residencies span multiple hospitals with a multitude of attendings providing additional educational opportunities available via cross-coverage. This study aims to evaluate the use of a mobile application (app) for operative cross-coverage to improve surgical opportunities in a large surgical residency program and decrease the number of uncovered cases. METHODS: An app allowing for uncovered cases to be sent to all surgical residents was used starting March 2022. A survey was completed by residents pre- and postapp implementation. A retrospective chart review was conducted of all general surgery procedures at the 2 major hospital systems 4 months before and after implementation to evaluate resident case coverage. RESULTS: In the preapp survey, 71% (27/38) of residents noted cross-covering 1 or more cases a month with 90% (34/38) reporting, they were unaware of all cases available. In the postapp survey, 100% of residents reported better awareness of available cases, 97% (35/36) reported uncovered cases were more easily accessible, 100% felt the app simplified finding coverage, and 100% wanted to continue the app long-term. On retrospective review, 7210 cases were identified in the preapp and postapp period with an increased volume of cases in the postapp period. After implementation of the case coverage app, there was a significant increase in total case coverage (p = <0.001) as well as a significant increase in coverage of endoscopic (p = 0.007), laparoscopic (p = 0.025), open (p = 0.015) and robotic cases (p = <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the impact that technological innovation can play in the education and operative experiences of surgical residents. This can be used to improve operative experiences of residents in various surgical fields in any training program throughout the country.

Trends in General Surgery Operative Experience Obtained by Integrated Vascular Surgery Residents.

OBJECTIVE: When the integrated vascular surgery training pathway was introduced, training was comprised of nearly equal amounts of core general surgery and vascular surgery experience. However, specific requirements for case numbers or types were not defined. Over time, the time spent on core general surgery requirements has been reduced, most recently in 2018, from 24 to 18 months. We sought to determine trends in general surgery case volume and type over the past 10 years for vascular surgery residents. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case log data for integrated vascular surgery graduates from 2012-2018. We evaluated trends in mean numbers of cases, categorized as general surgery open (GS-open), general surgery laparoscopic (GS-laparoscopic), vascular surgery open (VS-open), and vascular surgery endovascular (VS-endo). Cases were also categorized by anatomic region as head/neck, thoracic, or abdominal. RESULTS: The mean number of total head/neck, thoracic, or abdominal cases logged by graduating integrated vascular surgery trainees was 263.5. This total, as well as the proportion of general surgery cases (35%-38%, p = 0.99) has remained constant over time. The type of general surgery cases has changed significantly, with an upward trend in the mean number of GS-open cases and downward trend in mean GS-laparoscopic cases (GS-open p = 0.006, GS-laparoscopic p = 0.048). Among head/neck and thoracic subgroups, no significant changes were observed, while in the abdominal subgroup, there has been a significant increase in GS-open over time (p = 0.005). Additionally, the number of open vascular abdominal aortic cases has remained stable, with an average of 36.82 per graduating trainee per year. CONCLUSIONS: In the 10 years since the introduction of integrated vascular surgery programs, total case volume and proportion of general surgery cases have remained remarkably stable. The type of general surgery cases has shifted though, with a decrease in GS-laparoscopic cases, replaced primarily by open abdominal cases. These changes likely reflect integrated vascular residents actively seeking out these opportunities during their core rotations and a willingness by general surgery partners to provide these opportunities. At the program level, these data may help guide program directors' choices about the specific core rotations they incorporate into their curriculum. At the national level, this information may contribute to future discussions regarding the optimal number of core general surgery rotation requirements.

The effect of COVID-19 on trainee operative experience at a multihospital academic neurosurgical practice: A first look at case numbers.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has had a significant impact on the economy, health care, and society as a whole. To prevent the spread of infection, local governments across the United States issued mandatory lockdowns and stay-at-home orders. In the surgical world, elective cases ceased to help "flatten the curve" and prevent the infection from spreading to hospital staff and patients. We explored the effect of the cancellation of these procedures on trainee operative experience at our high-volume, multihospital neurosurgical practice. METHODS: Our department cancelled all elective cases starting March 16, 2020, and resumed elective surgical and endovascular procedures on May 11, 2020. We retrospectively reviewed case volumes for 54 days prelockdown and 54 days postlockdown to evaluate the extent of the decrease in surgical volume at our institution. Procedure data were collected and then divided into cranial, spine, functional, peripheral nerve, pediatrics, and endovascular categories. RESULTS: Mean total cases per day in the prelockdown group were 12.26 ± 7.7, whereas in the postlockdown group, this dropped to 7.78 ± 5.5 (P = 0.01). In the spine category, mean cases per day in the prelockdown group were 3.13 ± 2.63; in the postlockdown group, this dropped to 0.96 ± 1.36 (P < 0.001). In the functional category, mean cases per day in the prelockdown group were 1.31 ± 1.51, whereas in the postlockdown group, this dropped to 0.11 ± 0.42 (P < 0.001). For cranial (P = 0.245), peripheral nerve (P = 0.16), pediatrics (P = 0.34), and endovascular (P = 0.48) cases, the volumes dropped but were not statistically significant decreases. CONCLUSION: The impact of this outbreak on operative training does appear to be significant based solely on statistics. Although the drop in case volumes during this time can be accounted for by the pandemic, it is important to understand that this is a multifactorial effect. Further studies are needed for these results to be generalizable and to fully understand the effect this pandemic has had on trainee operative experience.

Impact of Elective Case Postponement Secondary to COVID-19 on General Surgery Residents' Experience: Operative Cases Logged at Three Academic Teaching Hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize changes in the total operative cases logged by general surgery residents across three residency programs. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. De-identified case logs, divided by institution and post graduate year (PGY) level, were obtained from the general surgery training programs at three academic hospitals. Total cases logged were calculated over the pandemic period (start: beginning of residency, end: May 31st, 2020) and the control period (start: beginning of residency, end: May 31st, 2019). SETTING: Three academic tertiary hospitals (Mayo Clinic - Arizona, Mayo Clinic - Florida, and Mayo Clinic - Rochester) PARTICIPANTS: All general surgery residents at these three hospitals, including 25 residents at Mayo Clinic - Arizona in both the pandemic and control period, 16 and 15 residents at Mayo Clinic - Florida in the control and pandemic period, respectively, and 81 and 77 residents at Mayo Clinic - Rochester in the control and pandemic period, respectively. RESULTS: Only PGY 4 general surgery residents at Mayo Clinic - Rochester had a decrease in operative cases logged in the pandemic period (759 cases on average compared to 1010 cases, p = 0.005), with no other changes in operative cases logged noted. CONCLUSIONS: While elective cases were postponed secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic for around 1 month in the spring of 2020, the decrease in elective cases did not greatly impact overall resident operative cases logged for residents in three general surgery residency programs.

The Robotic Surgery Learning Experience Through the Eyes of the Medical Student: What Do They See?

INTRODUCTION: Robotic technology has an increasing prevalence in the operating room across various specialties. How this technology influences the learning of medical students has yet to be identified. The purpose of this study is to identify the impact of robotic surgery on medical student learning in the operating room. METHODS: Medical students at the Medical College of Wisconsin who had completed their core clinical clerkships and were exposed to robotic surgery qualified for the study. An email survey was sent to all fourth year medical students requesting volunteers to be interviewed. During the 30-minute interviews, students responded to open-ended questions about their experiences with robotic surgery. The interviews were transcribed, codes were identified using an inductive approach, and themes were generated. RESULTS: Overall 10 interviews were conducted: 4 females and 6 males. No new themes were identified after the seventh interview. Through the medical student interviews, 4 themes emerged regarding the influence of robotic surgery on medical student learning: the robot itself, enhanced learning through the robotic technology, the medical student learning experience, and how others influence the medical student learning environment. CONCLUSIONS: The robotic operating room is not currently a motivating learning environment for medical students. However, by providing a more effective curriculum for students, incorporating elements of orientation, legitimate roles of participation, and simulation, students may gain a learning benefit from this technology versus avoiding the technology altogether. Additionally, it is important to educate faculty and residents on better ways to incorporate students into the robotic operating room environment to ensure an optimal learning experience.

Resident Operative Experience in Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery: Exposing the Divide.

BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires an experience in hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery as part of general surgery residency training. The composition of this experience, however, is unclear. We set out to evaluate current trends in the HPB experience of US general surgery residents. METHODS: National ACGME operative case logs from 1990 to 2016 were examined with a focus on the HPB operative domains. Time-trend analysis was performed using ANOVA and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Median biliary, liver, and pancreatic operative volumes increased by 30%, 33%, and 27% over the 27-year study period (all p < 0.05). Both core and advanced HPB cases increased, but the rate of increase for core was four times greater than that of advanced. However, when cholecystectomy was excluded, this trend reversed such that HPB core operations decreased by 11 cases over the study period. Further analysis demonstrated that laparoscopic cholecystectomy comprised 90% of all biliary cases and 77% of all HPB cases for graduates in 2016. Finally, operative volume variability-the difference in case numbers between high and low volume residents-increased by 16%, 21%, and 73% for the biliary, liver, and pancreatic domains, respectively (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite increases in overall HPB operative volume, the HPB experience is changing for today's surgical trainees. Moreover, the HPB experience is comprised largely of a single operation-the cholecystectomy. Awareness of these trends is important for surgical educators to facilitate adequate exposure to HPB surgery among general surgery residents.

Trends in Routine and Complex Hepatobiliary Surgery Among General and Pediatric Surgical Residents: What is the Next Generation Learning and is it Enough?

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies reveal a correlation between surgical volume and outcomes; thus, a similar relationship likely exists between trainee operative volume and technical competence. While routine hepatobiliary surgery is commonplace, trainee exposure to the more advanced procedures may be lacking. We hypothesize that experience in complex hepatobiliary procedures may be deficient both during general surgery residency and pediatric surgery fellowship training. DESIGN: Case log data from the ACGME were queried for general surgery residents (2000-2017) and pediatric surgery fellows (2004-2017). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was considered a routine hepatobiliary procedure for both specialties. For general surgery, hepatic lobectomy/segmentectomy and choledochoenteric anastomosis were considered complex and for pediatric surgery, hepatic lobectomy, biliary atresia and choledochal cyst procedures were considered complex. SETTING: Publicly available case log data from the ACGME. PARTICIPANTS: General surgery residents and pediatric surgery fellows at ACGME-accredited training programs. RESULTS: The number of trainees increased over the study period for both groups. Mean case volumes for laparoscopic cholecystectomy increased by 36% in surgery graduates and by 114% in pediatric surgery graduates. In surgery, the mean volumes for choledochoenteric anastomosis procedures decreased by 53% from 3.0 to 1.4 procedures/year with increasing variability in trainee experience. Volumes for hepatic lobectomy/segmentectomy increased by 68% from 3.4 to 5.7 procedures/year with decreasing variability. In pediatric surgery, case volumes for complex procedures were low (mean <4/year), highly variable among trainees, and appear unchanged between 2004 and 2017. In every year analyzed, at least 1 pediatric surgery trainee reported doing 0 cases in one of these complex categories. CONCLUSIONS: Case logs suggest that the volume of complex hepatobiliary surgery remains low and highly variable in both disciplines with some trainees obtaining minimal or no exposure to certain cases. The relationship between these trends and the development of competency is worthy of further study.