Impact of surgical risk factors for non-union on lumbar spinal fusion outcomes using cellular bone allograft at 24-months follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The current report investigates fusion rates and patient-reported outcomes following lumbar spinal surgery using cellular bone allograft (CBA) in patients with risk factors for non-union. METHODS: A prospective, open label study was conducted in subjects undergoing lumbar spinal fusion with CBA (NCT02969616) to assess fusion success rates and patient-reported outcomes in subjects with risk factors for non-union. Subjects were categorized into low-risk (≤ 1 risk factors) and high-risk (> 1 risk factors) groups. Radiographic fusion status was evaluated by an independent review of dynamic radiographs and CT scans. Patient-reported outcome measures included quality of life (EQ-5D), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scales (VAS) for back and leg pain. Adverse event reporting was conducted throughout 24-months of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 274 subjects were enrolled: 140 subjects (51.1%) were categorized into the high-risk group (> 1 risk factor) and 134 subjects (48.9%) into the low-risk group (≤ 1 risk factors). The overall mean age at screening was 58.8 years (SD 12.5) with a higher distribution of females (63.1%) than males (36.9%). No statistical difference in fusion rates were observed between the low-risk (90.0%) and high-risk (93.9%) groups (p > 0.05). A statistically significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes (EQ-5D, ODI and VAS) was observed at all time points (p < 0.05) in both low and high-risk groups. The low-risk group showed enhanced improvement at multiple timepoints in EQ-5D, ODI, VAS-Back pain and VAS-Leg pain scores compared to the high-risk group (p < 0.05). The number of AEs were similar among risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates high fusion rates following lumbar spinal surgery using CBA, regardless of associated risk factors. Patient reported outcomes and fusion rates were not adversely affected by risk factor profiles. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02969616 (21/11/2016).

Impact of external beam radiation on total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes: a propensity-matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: External beam radiation therapy has a number of deleterious effects on the body, and a number of post-operative complications have been reported for several surgeries including total knee arthroplasty. However, few studies have investigated the impact of external beam radiation therapy for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Our study aimed to assess the systemic and joint complications associated with TSA in patients with prior radiation exposures, as well as evaluate the surgical outcomes of radiation patients compared to non-radiation TSA patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the TriNetX Analytics Network. A 1:1 propensity score matching function was utilized to create two cohorts with matched baseline characteristics within the TriNetX network. Comparisons of the primary and secondary outcomes between the two cohorts were made using odds ratios. A p value of < 0.05 was determined to be significant. RESULTS: A total of 75,510 patients that received TSA were identified with 1505 having a history of radiation therapy (RT) and 73,605 with no radiation therapy (non-RT). After propensity matching, both groups contained 1484 patients. RT patients were at higher risk for developing prosthetic joint infection, acute renal failure, altered mental state, cerebrovascular event, DVT, PE, pneumonia, respiratory failure, and UTI compared to non-RT patients at different time points (p < 0.5). CONCLUSION: Patients with prior history of external beam radiation undergoing TSA had a higher risk of systemic complications and prosthetic joint infection compared to patients without a prior history. These complications suggest a more complicated post-operative management course for these patients.

Peri-operative determinants of prolonged CICU stay after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in elderly at a private tertiary care hospital: A case control study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore peri-operative risk factors associated with prolonged stay in cardiac intensive care unit among patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: This retrospective case control study was conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, comprised medical records of patients who had undergone cardiothoracic revascularisation surgery from January 2006 to December 2013. The patients were grouped into cases and controls at a ratio of 1:2 on the basis of length of stay at cardiac intensive care unit, i.e. >72 hours and <72 hours. Independent risk factors for prolonged cardiac intensive care unitstay were evaluated. SPSS 20 was used for data analysis. Results: Of the 999 patients, 333(33.3%) were cases and 666(66.6%) were controls. The mean age of cases was 62.5±9.7 years and that of controls was 60.8±9.6 years (p=0.007). The number of males was 280(84.1%) among the cases and 489(73.4%)among the controls. Adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence interval for age and male gender were 1.02 (1.0,1.03) and [1.90 (1.32,2.74)]; diabetics were at high risk of staying longer [1.51 (1.13,2.02)]; previous cardiovascular interventions [1.65 (1.05,2.59)], intra-aortic balloon pump insertion [1.45 (1.01,2.08)], initial ventilation time and post-operative bleeding tamponade were independently associated with prolonged cardiac intensive care unit stay [1.01 (1.00, 1.01)] and [1.9 (1.13,3.2)], respectively. The risk of dying among the cases was three times more after adjusting for all covariates in the model [3.1 (1.52,6.31)]. Conclusion: Advanced age, male gender, diabetes, previous cardiovascular interventions, post-operative intra-aortic balloon pump insertion, initial ventilation support and post-op bleeding tamponade were found to be the independent risk factors for prolonged cardiac intensive care unit stay.

A modified frailty index predicts complication, readmission, and 30-day mortality following the revision total hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to develop a modified frailty index (MFI) to predict the risks of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: Data from the American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were analyzed for patients who underwent revision THA from 2015 to 2020. An MFI was composed of the risk factors, including severe obesity (body mass index > 35), osteoporosis, non-independent function status prior to surgery, congestive heart failure within 30 days of surgery, hypoalbuminemia (serum albumin < 3.5), hypertension requiring medication, type 1 or type 2 diabetes, and a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or pneumonia. The patients were assigned based on the MFI scores (MFI0, no risk factor; MFI1, 1-2 risk factors; MFI2, 3-4 risk factors; and MFI3, 5+ risk factors). Confidence intervals were set at 95% with a P value less than or equal to 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 17,868 patients (45% male, 55% female) were included and had an average age of 68.5 ± 11.5 years. Odds of any complication, when compared to MFI0, were 1.4 (95% CI [1.3, 1.6]) times greater for MFI1, 3.2 (95% CI [2.8, 3.6]) times greater for MFI2, and 10.8 (95% CI [5.8, 20.0]) times greater for MFI3 (P < 0.001). Odds of readmission, when compared to MFI0, were 1.4 (95% CI [1.3, 1.7]) times greater for MFI1, 2.5 (95% CI [2.1, 3.0]) times greater for MFI2, and 4.1 (95% CI [2.2, 7.8]) times greater for MFI3 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Increasing MFI scores correlate with increased odds of complication and readmission in patients who have undergone revision THA. This MFI may be used to predict the risks after revision THA.

A retrospective analysis of perioperative complications of lateral approach lumbar interbody fusion in patients with prior abdominal surgery or a history of colonic inflammatory disease.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lateral approaches for lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) allow for access to the lumbar spine and disc space by passing through a retroperitoneal corridor either pre- or trans-psoas. A contraindication for this approach is the presence of retroperitoneal scarring that may occur from prior surgical intervention in the retroperitoneal space or from inflammatory conditions with fibrotic changes and pose challenges for the mobilization and visualization needed in this approach. However, there is a paucity of evidence on the prevalence of surgical complications following lateral fusion surgery in patients with a history of abdominal surgery. PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study is to describe the association between surgical complications following lateral interbody fusion surgery and prior abdominal surgical. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients over the age of 18 who underwent lateral lumbar interbody fusion at a large, tertiary care center between 2011 and 2019 were included in the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome included medical, surgical, and thigh-related complications either in the intraoperative or 90-day postoperative periods. Additional outcome metrics included readmission rates, length of stay, and operative duration. METHODS: The electronic health records of 250 patients were reviewed for demographic information, surgical data, complications, and readmission following surgery. The association of patient and surgical factors to complication rate was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. Statistical analysis was performed using R statistical software (R, Vienna, Austria). RESULTS: Of 250 lateral interbody fusion patients, 62.8% had a prior abdominal surgery and 13.8% had a history of colonic disease. The most common perioperative complication was transient thigh or groin pain/sensory changes (n=62, 24.8%). A multivariable logistic regression considering prior abdominal surgery, age, BMI, history of colonic disease, multilevel surgery, and the approach relative to psoas found no significant association between surgical complication rates and colonic disease (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.02-2.22) or a history of prior abdominal surgeries (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.20-1.55). Further, the invasiveness of prior abdominal surgeries showed no association with overall spine complication rate, lateral-specific complications, or readmission rates (p>.05). CONCLUSION: Though retroperitoneal scarring is an important consideration for lateral approaches to the lumbar spine, this study found no association between lateral lumbar approach complication rates and prior abdominal surgery. Further study is needed to determine the impact of inflammatory colonic disease on lateral approach spine surgery.

A Practical Approach to Predicting Surgical Site Infection Risk Among Patients Before Leaving the Operating Room.

A surgical site infection (SSI) prediction model that identifies at-risk patients before leaving the operating room can support efforts to improve patient safety. In this study, eight pre-operative and five perioperative patient- and procedure-specific characteristics were tested with two scoring algorithms: 1) count of positive factors (manual), and 2) logistic regression model (automated). Models were developed and validated using data from 3,440 general and oncologic surgical patients. In the automated algorithm, two pre-operative (procedure urgency, odds ratio [OR]: 1.7; and antibiotic administration >2 hours before incision, OR: 1.6) and three intraoperative risk factors (open surgery [OR: 3.7], high-risk procedure [OR: 3.5], and operative time OR: [2.6]) were associated with SSI risk. The manual score achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.831 and the automated algorithm achieved AUC of 0.868. Open surgery had the greatest impact on prediction, followed by procedure risk, operative time, and procedure urgency. At 80% sensitivity, the manual and automated scores achieved a positive predictive value of 16.3% and 22.0%, respectively. Both the manual and automated SSI risk prediction algorithms accurately identified at-risk populations. Use of either model before the patient leaves the operating room can provide the clinical team with evidence-based guidance to consider proactive intervention to prevent SSIs.

The severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with adverse outcomes after open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed associations between outcomes after open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair and preoperative airflow limitation stratified by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) spirometric classification of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) severity. METHODS: Among 2368 open elective TAAA repairs in patients with spirometric data, 1735 patients had COPD and 633 did not. Those with COPD were stratified by preoperative respiratory dysfunction as GOLD 1 (forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration [FEV1] ≥80% of predicted; n = 228), GOLD 2 (50% ≤ FEV1 < 80% of predicted; n = 1215), GOLD 3 (30% ≤ FEV1 < 50% of predicted; n = 260), or GOLD 4 (FEV1 < 30% of predicted; n = 32). Early outcomes included operative mortality and adverse events (operative death or persistent stroke, spinal cord deficit, or renal failure requiring dialysis); associations of outcomes were determined using logistic regression models. Kaplan-Meier analysis compared late survival by the log-rank test. RESULTS: Pulmonary complications occurred in 38.4% of patients with COPD versus 30.0% without COPD (P < .001). Operative mortality and adverse events were more frequent in patients with COPD than without COPD (7.9% vs 3.8% [P < .001] and 14.9% vs 9.8% [P = .001], respectively). Worsening GOLD severity was independently associated with operative death and adverse event. Survival was poorer in patients with COPD than in those without (61.9% ± 1.2% vs 73.6% ± 1.8% at 5 years; P < .001), particularly in patients with increasing GOLD severity (68.7% ± 3.2% vs 63.7% ± 1.4% vs 51.4% ± 3.2% vs 31.3% ± 8.2% at 5 years; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with COPD are at elevated risk for operative death and adverse events. Staging by GOLD severity aids preoperative risk stratification. Patients with airflow limitations may benefit from optimization before TAAA repair.

Risk and Protective Factors Associated with Surgical Infections among Spine Patients.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to identify patient-specific and procedure-specific risk and protective factors associated with post-operative surgical site infections (SSIs) among surgical spine patients. METHODS: CINAHL, PubMed, Ovid, Medline, and EBSCO databases were searched for articles within the past 10 years (January 2003-March 2015). The keywords and combinations used in the search included: Spine surgery, post-operative infection, risk factors, orthopedic infections. The search resulted in 842 articles of which 29 met inclusion criteria. This systematic review adheres to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. RESULTS: Evidence about patient-specific and procedure-specific factors associated with increased risk of post-operative SSIs among patients undergoing orthopedic spinal surgery is inconclusive. Gender (male), age, body mass index, cigarette smoking, diabetes mellitus, a history of infection and alcohol abuse were identified as common patient-specific risk factors. Blood transfusion, implantation, and steroid use were found to increase SSIs in certain studies and associated with no significant difference in other studies. Protective factors include the implementation of pre-operative elements to reduce infection; protocols addressing patient-related factors (smoking, weight, glucose) and operation-related factors (antibiotic prophylaxis, prosthetics, length of operation, and pre-operative cultures); incision drains placed intra-operatively; anterior approach; laminar-flow operating theater, and skin antisepsis using chlorhexidine. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions focusing on minimizing patient-specific risk factors and operation-specific risk factors and optimizing patient-specific protective factors and operation-specific protective factors are most effective in minimizing the likelihood of a post-operative infection among patients undergoing orthopedic spinal surgical procedures. The studies reviewed provide conflicting evidence relative to risk and protective factors.