A short-term evaluation of a prototype disposable Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) device in a cohort of children with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) devices are important adjuncts to airway clearance therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Current devices are typically reusable and require daily, or often more frequent, cleaning to prevent risk of infection by acting as reservoirs of potentially pathogenic organisms. In response, a daily disposable OPEP device, the UL-OPEP, was developed to mitigate the risk of contamination and eliminate the burdensome need for cleaning devices. METHODS: A convenience sample of 36 participants, all current OPEP device users, was recruited from a paediatric CF service. For one month, participants replaced their current OPEP device with a novel daily disposable device. Assessment included pre- and post-intervention lung function by spirometry, as well as Lung Clearance Index. Quality of life was assessed using the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire - Revised, while user experience was evaluated with a post-study survey. RESULTS: 31 participants completed the study: 18 males; median age 10 years, range 4-16 years. Lung function (mean difference ± SD, %FEV1 = 1.69 ± 11.93; %FVC = 0.58 ± 10.04; FEV1: FVC = 0.01 ± 0.09), LCI (mean difference ± SD, 0.08 ± 1.13), six-minute walk test, and CFQ-R were unchanged post-intervention. Participant-reported experiences of the device were predominantly positive. CONCLUSIONS: The disposable OPEP device maintained patients' lung function during short term use (≤ 1 month), and was the subject of positive feedback regarding functionality while reducing the risk of airway contamination associated with ineffective cleaning. REGISTRATION: The study was approved as a Clinical Investigation by the Irish Health Products Regulatory Authority (CRN-2209025-CI0085).

The effects of oscillating positive expiratory pressure therapy in adults with stable non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: A systematic review.

Airway clearance techniques (ACTs) are recommended for patients with stable non-cystic fibrosis (non-CF) bronchiectasis, but the efficacy of oscillating positive expiratory pressure (PEP) therapy compared to other techniques has not been reviewed. A systematic review of studies was conducted in stable patients comparing the effect of oscillating PEP therapy to other ACTs or a control condition. Data were extracted related to sputum expectoration, lung function, gas exchange, quality of life (QOL), symptoms, and exacerbation rate. Seven studies were included with a total of 146 patients, with a mean (SD) PEDro score of 7(1). Oscillating PEP therapy enhanced sputum expectoration compared to no treatment, but has equivalent benefits as the active cycle of breathing technique with gravity-assisted drainage (mean difference [95% CI] -2.8 g [-8.8 to 3.2 g]). Oscillating PEP has a similar effect as other ACTs on dynamic lung volumes, gas exchange and breathlessness. Use of oscillating PEP improved disease-specific QOL (p < 0.001) and cough-related QOL (p < 0.002) compared to no treatment but did not reduce exacerbation rate. In conclusion, in stable non-CF bronchiectasis, oscillating PEP therapy is associated with improvement in sputum expectoration and QOL compared to no treatment. Compared to other ACTs, the effect upon sputum expectoration, lung function, gas exchange, and symptoms are equivalent.

Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure Therapy May Be Performed Poorly by Children With Cystic Fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Oscillating positive expiratory pressure devices aid removal of excess secretions and reduce gas trapping in patients with hypersecretory pulmonary diseases, for example, cystic fibrosis. Oscillating positive expiratory pressure works when the patient exhales actively against a fixed resistor, which generates mean intrapulmonary pressures of 10-20 cm H2O with rapid fluctuations of at least 1 cm H2O from the mean. In this study, we evaluated the performance of oscillating positive expiratory pressure therapy by pediatric subjects with cystic fibrosis to determine adherence to target therapeutic pressures. METHODS: Twenty-one pediatric subjects were recruited. Each had a history of using an oscillating positive expiratory pressure device twice daily and had received standardized training and instructions from the same specialist physiotherapist. Performance was evaluated by using a flow and pressure sensor placed in-line between the participant's mouth and the device. The participants performed expirations as per their normal routine. RESULTS: None of the participants achieved target therapeutic pressure ranges during expiration. The mean ± SD pressure generated was 16.2 ± 6.8 cm H2O, whereas mean ± SD flow was 31.3 ± 8.9 L/min. The mean ± SD expiration length was 2.5 ± 1.4 s. CONCLUSIONS: Despite standardized instruction, the results demonstrated considerable variation among the participants and overall poor technique during use. Outcomes of this study indicated that airway clearance effects of oscillating positive expiratory pressure were compromised due to poor technique.