Efficacy and safety of eliapixant in endometriosis-associated pelvic pain: the randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2b SCHUMANN study.

BACKGROUND: The SCHUMANN study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the selective P2 × 3 antagonist eliapixant in patients with endometriosis-associated pelvic pain (EAPP). METHODS: SCHUMANN was a randomized, placebo- and active comparator-controlled, double-blind to placebo and open-label to comparator, parallel-group, multicenter, dose-finding phase 2b study. The participants were women with surgically diagnosed endometriosis who fulfilled defined EAPP criteria. Participants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to twice daily (BID) 25 mg, 75 mg, or 150 mg oral eliapixant or a placebo for 12 weeks. An exploratory once-daily elagolix 150 mg treatment group was also included. The primary endpoint was the absolute change in mean worst EAPP from baseline to the end of intervention (EOI). RESULTS: Overall, 215 participants were randomized for treatment (44 to eliapixant 25 mg, 44 to eliapixant 75 mg, 43 to eliapixant 150 mg, 43 to a placebo, and 41 to elagolix 150 mg). For safety reasons, the study was terminated early; both treatment and enrollment stopped immediately, producing less than 50% of the planned number of completers. The study found no significant differences in EAPP reduction from baseline between groups and no significant dose-response model. The elagolix 150 mg group showed better pain reduction than any of the other groups. No new safety signals were observed, relative to the previously known safety profile of eliapixant, which was generally well tolerated. However, one case of moderate and probably drug-induced liver injury in a participant receiving eliapixant 150 mg BID supported the association between eliapixant and a potential increase in liver function values, defined before the start of the phase 2 program. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not meet its primary objective as no statistically significant or clinically relevant differences in changes of mean worst EAPP from baseline were observed between treatment groups. The single observed case of moderate, probably drug-induced liver injury was the second case in the eliapixant phase 2 program conducted in the following indications: refractory or unexplained chronic cough, diabetic neuropathic pain, overactive bladder, and EAPP. Due to this, the benefit-risk ratio for the study was no longer considered to be positive. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04614246; registered November 3, 2020.

The P2X3 receptor antagonist filapixant in patients with refractory chronic cough: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: P2X3 receptor antagonists seem to have a promising potential for treating patients with refractory chronic cough. In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, we investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the novel selective P2X3 receptor antagonist filapixant (BAY1902607) in patients with refractory chronic cough. METHODS: Following a crossover design, 23 patients with refractory chronic cough (age: 60.4 ± 9.1 years) received ascending doses of filapixant in one period (20, 80, 150, and 250 mg, twice daily, 4-days-on/3-days-off) and placebo in the other. The primary efficacy endpoint was the 24-h cough frequency on Day 4 of each dosing step. Further, subjective cough severity and health-related quality of life were assessed. RESULTS: Filapixant at doses ≥ 80 mg significantly reduced cough frequency and severity and improved cough health-related quality of life. Reductions in 24-h cough frequency over placebo ranged from 17% (80 mg dose) to 37% (250 mg dose), reductions over baseline from 23% (80 mg) to 41% (250 mg) (placebo: 6%). Reductions in cough severity ratings on a 100-mm visual analog scale ranged from 8 mm (80 mg) to 21 mm (250 mg). No serious or severe adverse events or adverse events leading to discontinuation of treatment were reported. Taste-related adverse events occurred in 4%, 13%, 43%, and 57% of patients treated with filapixant 20, 80, 150, and 250 mg, respectively, and in 12% treated with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Filapixant proved to be efficacious, safe, and-apart from the occurrence of taste disturbances, especially at higher dosages-well tolerated during the short therapeutic intervention. Clinical trial registration EudraCT, eudract.ema.europa.eu, 2018-000129-29; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03535168.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Phase 2b Trial of P2X3 Receptor Antagonist Sivopixant for Refractory or Unexplained Chronic Cough.

INTRODUCTION: To determine the optimal dose of sivopixant, a highly selective P2X3 receptor antagonist, for refractory or unexplained chronic cough (RCC/UCC). METHODS: In this phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial, patients received sivopixant 50, 150, or 300 mg or placebo once daily for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was a change from baseline in 24-h cough frequency (coughs/h) with sivopixant vs placebo. RESULTS: Overall, 390/406 randomized patients completed the study. Placebo-adjusted changes in hourly cough count over 24 h were 13.17% (P = 0.3532), - 1.77% (P = 0.8935), and - 12.47% (P = 0.3241) and in cough severity (visual analog scale) were 1.75 mm (P = 0.5854), - 1.21 mm (P = 0.7056), and - 6.55 mm (P = 0.0433) with sivopixant 50, 150, and 300 mg, respectively. Placebo-adjusted changes from baseline in Leicester Cough Questionnaire total scores were - 0.37 (P = 0.4207), - 0.07 (P = 0.8806), and 0.69 (P = 0.1473) with sivopixant 50, 150, and 300 mg, respectively. Additionally, 61.3%, 78.3%, 86.8%, and 71.4% of patients receiving sivopixant 50, 150, and 300 mg and placebo, respectively, reported any improvements in Patient Global Impression of Change. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 25.7%, 32.0%, 49.0%, and 20.6% in sivopixant 50, 150, and 300 mg and placebo groups, respectively; all TEAEs in the sivopixant group were mild-to-moderate. CONCLUSION: Sivopixant did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference vs placebo in change from baseline in 24-h cough frequency. The dose of 300 mg has potential for RCC/UCC, showing the greatest improvements in cough frequency and patient-reported outcomes and dose-related mild to moderate reversible taste disturbance, although further trials are needed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04110054; registered September 26, 2019.

Efficacy and Safety of Eliapixant in Refractory Chronic Cough: The Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2b PAGANINI Study.

INTRODUCTION: The PAGANINI study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the selective P2X3 antagonist eliapixant in patients with refractory chronic cough (RCC). METHODS: PAGANINI was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicenter, dose-finding, phase 2b study. Adults with RCC lasting ≥ 12 months and cough severity ≥ 40 mm on a visual analog scale at screening were enrolled. Participants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to twice-daily 25 mg, 75 mg, or 150 mg oral eliapixant or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in 24-h cough count after 12 weeks of intervention. RESULTS: Overall, 310 participants were randomized to twice-daily eliapixant 25 mg (n = 75), 75 mg (n = 78), 150 mg (n = 80), or placebo (n = 77). A statistically significant dose-response signal with eliapixant was detected for the primary endpoint (all dose-response models, adjusted p < 0.1; one-sided). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 39 (51%) participants with placebo and 43-51 (57-65%) participants receiving eliapixant. The most common AE was dysgeusia, occurring in 1% (n = 1) of the placebo group and 1-16% (n = 1-13) of the eliapixant groups in a dose-related manner. One case of a moderate drug-induced liver injury occurred in a participant receiving 150 mg twice-daily eliapixant. CONCLUSION: Eliapixant demonstrated efficacy and a favorable taste tolerability profile in RCC. However, a drug-induced liver injury contributed to intensified liver monitoring in clinical trials with eliapixant and discontinuation of the entire development program in all indications by Bayer AG. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04562155; registered September 18, 2020.

Improvements in Objective and Subjective Measures of Chronic Cough with Gefapixant: A Pooled Phase 3 Efficacy Analysis of Predefined Subgroups.

INTRODUCTION: In phase 3 trials (COUGH-1/COUGH-2), gefapixant 45 mg twice daily significantly reduced 24-h cough frequency vs placebo in refractory or unexplained chronic cough (RCC or UCC). METHODS: Here, the efficacy of gefapixant 45 mg vs placebo was evaluated across COUGH-1/COUGH-2 in predefined subgroups based on sex, region, age, cough duration, cough severity, cough frequency, and diagnosis (RCC, UCC). Awake cough frequency reductions at Week 12 and LCQ response rates (i.e., ≥ 1.3-point improvement) at Week 24 were assessed. RESULTS: Among 1360 participants analyzed, gefapixant 45 mg resulted in consistent awake cough frequency reductions overall and across predefined subgroups at Week 12. Gefapixant also resulted in improved LCQ scores across subgroups at Week 24; ≥ 70% of participants in each subgroup treated with gefapixant 45 mg had an LCQ response. CONCLUSION: These data suggest gefapixant 45 mg provides consistent objective and subjective efficacy across subgroups of individuals with RCC or UCC.

Efficacy and Safety of Eliapixant in Overactive Bladder: The 12-Week, Randomised, Placebo-controlled Phase 2a OVADER Study.

BACKGROUND: Effective, well-tolerated novel treatments for overactive bladder (OAB) are lacking. The P2X3 receptor antagonist eliapixant demonstrated potential to reduce OAB symptoms in preclinical studies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of eliapixant in patients with OAB with urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: OVADER was a 12-wk, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 2a study (NCT04545580) conducted between 2020 and 2022 in private and institutional clinical practices. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 yr with wet OAB symptoms (urgency, urinary frequency, and urinary incontinence) for ≥3 mo before screening. INTERVENTION: Randomisation (1:1 ratio) to oral eliapixant 125 mg or placebo twice daily. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in the mean number of UUI episodes/24 h over weeks 4, 8, and 12 according to an electronic bladder diary, evaluated using a repeated-measurement model in a Bayesian framework. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of 202 patients enrolled, 85 were valid for per-protocol analysis. The primary efficacy endpoint was not met. The posterior probability for eliapixant superiority over placebo was 40% (point estimate 0.05, 95% credible interval -∞ to 0.38), which did not meet the predefined criterion of ≥90% probability. Secondary and exploratory endpoints were not met. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the eliapixant (n = 32, 63%) and placebo (n = 27, 56%) groups; most were mild and five led to discontinuation of eliapixant. CONCLUSIONS: OVADER did not meet its clinical efficacy endpoints. Potential reasons include the nonspecific OAB symptom complex, the poorly understood pathophysiology, and the coinciding COVID-19 pandemic. PATIENT SUMMARY: We tested whether a new drug called eliapixant would reduce symptoms of overactive bladder in comparison to placebo. We found that the drug did not work. More knowledge on how overactive bladder occurs is needed to find new drugs to treat this condition.

Gefapixant as a P2X3 receptor antagonist treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent disorder with serious health consequences but limited therapeutic options. For a subset of those with OSA, a key underlying mechanism is hypersensitive chemoreflex control of breathing. There is no approved therapy that targets this endotypic trait. Here we determine whether the P2X3 receptor antagonist gefapixant, which is predicted to attenuate hypersensitive carotid chemoreflexes, reduces OSA severity in patients with chemoreflex-dependent OSA. METHODS: In a randomized placebo-controlled cross-over study, 24 patients with moderate-to-severe OSA (aged 39-68 years, non-CPAP users) whose disorder was partially responsive to supplemental oxygen (chemoreflex-dependent OSA) were treated with gefapixant 180 mg (or placebo) administered as tablets taken orally before bedtime for 7 days and assessed via overnight polysomnography. The primary analysis examined whether gefapixant treatment resulted in a greater reduction in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) from baseline than placebo. RESULTS: Gefapixant did not lower the AHI significantly more than placebo; the estimated ratio of the AHI on gefapixant versus placebo was 0.92 [90% CI: 0.73, 1.17]. Notably, nocturnal hypoxemia was increased (ratio of total sleep time with SpO2 <90% on gefapixant versus placebo = 2.08 [90% CI: 1.53, 2.82]), consistent with reduced chemoreflex output. Commonly reported adverse events with gefapixant included ageusia, dysgeusia, oral hypoaesthesia, nausea, somnolence, and taste disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Gefapixant, while generally well tolerated, did not reduce OSA severity in patients with chemoreflex-dependent OSA. P2X3 receptor antagonism is unlikely to provide an avenue for therapeutic intervention in OSA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Safety and Tolerability of Gefapixant (MK-7264) in Participants With Obstructive Sleep Apnea (MK-7264-039); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03882801; Identifier: NCT03882801.

Effects of Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Gefapixant, a P2X3 Receptor Antagonist.

Gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with refractory or unexplained chronic cough. We investigated the effect of renal impairment (RI) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of gefapixant 50 mg in an open-label, single-dose study enrolling participants with moderate (n = 6) or severe (n = 6) RI, end-stage renal disease (ESRD; n = 6) under hemodialysis (HD) and non-HD conditions, and healthy matched controls (n = 6). Serial plasma and urine samples for gefapixant concentrations were collected at selected time points over 72 and 48 hours after dosing, respectively. Linear regression analysis predicted a 1.87-, 2.79-, and 3.76-fold higher exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve) for participants with mild, moderate, and severe RI, respectively, than that for healthy matched control participants. Categorical analysis exhibited a 2.98-, 4.43-, and 4.74-fold higher exposure for participants with moderate RI, severe RI, and ESRD, respectively, than that for healthy matched control participants. Apparent oral clearance and renal clearance was lower in participants with various degrees of RI, by 66% to 90%, compared with healthy matched control participants, explaining the increased gefapixant exposure with increasing degrees of renal impairment. Gefapixant area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration decreased by ≈25% under HD conditions compared to non-HD conditions. Single-dose administration of gefapixant was generally well tolerated in this study. The data from this trial informed the enrollment of phase 3 clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of gefapixant in >2000 participants with refractory or unexplained chronic cough. Those efficacy and safety data, combined with analysis of population pharmacokinetics from across the entire development program, will be used to evaluate the magnitude of the renal impairment effect in the refractory or unexplained chronic cough population and to determine any dose adjustment recommendations.

Treatment of Persistent Cough in Subjects with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) with Gefapixant, a P2X3 Antagonist, in a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic cough is a highly problematic symptom for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF); limited therapeutic options are available. We evaluated gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, for the treatment of chronic cough in IPF. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study included subjects with IPF. Sequence A included gefapixant 50 mg BID (period 1; 14 days) followed by placebo (period 2; 14 days); sequence B had the opposite sequence of treatments. This regimen was specified in a protocol amendment that modified the original active treatment regimen of gefapixant 50 mg BID for 10 days and 150 mg BID for 4 days. Patients randomized to the original treatment regimen were excluded from efficacy analyses but included in safety assessments. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in awake cough frequency (coughs/hour) from periods 1 and 2 combined. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: A total of 51 subjects were randomized, 44 of whom were randomized to treatment sequences evaluated in the primary efficacy analysis (i.e., 22 subjects in sequence A and 22 subjects in sequence B); seven subjects received the treatment assigned before the protocol amendment and were excluded from efficacy analyses. The change from baseline in awake cough frequency from periods 1 and 2 combined (mixed model for repeated measures analysis) did not demonstrate a significant reduction versus placebo in cough at day 14 (p = 0.90); in a post hoc analysis of log-transformed data p value for reduction versus placebo at day 14 was 0.07. The most common AEs were related to taste (dysgeusia and ageusia). CONCLUSIONS: Gefapixant was generally well tolerated but was not associated with a significant improvement in chronic cough in subjects with IPF as defined by the primary endpoint in this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02502097.