Impact of setup errors on the robustness of linac-based single-isocenter coplanar and non-coplanar VMAT plans for multiple brain metastases.

PURPOSE: Patient setup errors have been a primary concern impacting the dose delivery accuracy in radiation therapy. A robust treatment plan might mitigate the effects of patient setup errors. In this reported study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of translational and rotational errors on the robustness of linac-based, single-isocenter, coplanar, and non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment plans for multiple brain metastases. METHODS: Fifteen patients were retrospectively selected for this study with a combined total of 49 gross tumor volumes (GTVs). Single-isocenter coplanar and non-coplanar plans were generated first with a prescribed dose of 40 Gy in 5 fractions or 42 Gy in 7 fractions to cover 95% of planning target volume (PTV). Next, four setup errors (+1  and +2 mm translation, and +1° and +2° rotation) were applied individually to generate modified plans. Different plan quality evaluation metrics were compared between coplanar and non-coplanar plans. 3D gamma analysis (3%/2 mm) was performed to compare the modified plans (+2 mm and +2° only) and the original plans. Paired t-test was conducted for statistical analysis. RESULTS: After applying setup errors, variations of all plan evaluation metrics were similar (p > 0.05). The worst case for V100% to GTV was 92.07% ± 6.13% in the case of +2 mm translational error. 3D gamma pass rates were > 90% for both coplanar (+2 mm and +2°) and the +2 mm non-coplanar groups but was 87.40% ± 6.89% for the +2° non-coplanar group. CONCLUSION: Translational errors have a greater impact on PTV and GTV dose coverage for both planning methods. Rotational errors have a greater negative impact on gamma pass rates of non-coplanar plans. Plan evaluation metrics after applying setup errors showed that both coplanar and non-coplanar plans were robust and clinically acceptable.

A study of skin marker alignment using different diamond-shaped light fields for prone breast external-beam radiation therapy.

For breast cancer patients treated in the prone position with tangential fields, a diamond-shaped light field (DSLF) can be used to align with corresponding skin markers for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). This study evaluates and compares the benefits of different DSLF setups. Seventy-one patients who underwent daily tangential kilovoltage (kV) IGRT were categorized retrospectively into four groups: (1) DSLF field size (FS) = 10 × 10 cm2 , gantry angle = 90° (right breast)/270° (left breast), with the same isocenter as treatment tangential beams; (2) same as group 1, except DSLF FS = 4 × 4 cm2 ; (3) DSLF FS = 4 × 4-6 × 8 cm2 , gantry angle = tangential treatment beam, off-isocenter so that the DSLF was at the approximate breast center; and (4) No-DSLF. We compared their total setup time (including any DSLF/marker-based alignment and IGRT) and relative kV-based couch shift corrections. For groups 1-3, DSLF-only dose distributions (excluding kV-based correction) were simulated by reversely shifting the couch positions from the computed tomography plans, which were assumed equivalent to the delivered dose when both DSLF and IGRT were used. For patient groups 1-4, the average daily setup time was 2.6, 2.5, 5.0, and 8.3 min, respectively. Their mean and standard deviations of daily kV-based couch shifts were 0.64 ± 0.4, 0.68 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 0.6, and 1.0 ± 0.6 cm. The average target dose changes after excluding kV-IGRT for groups 1-3 were-0.2%, -0.1%, and +0.4%, respectively, whereas DSLF-1 was most efficient in sparing heart and chest wall, DSLF-2 had lowest lung Dmax ; and DSLF-3 maintained the highest target coverage at the cost of highest OAR dose. In general, the use of DSLF greatly reduces patient setup time and may result in smaller IGRT corrections. If IGRT is limited, different DSLF setups yield different target coverage and OAR dose sparing. Our findings will help DSLF setup optimization in the prone breast treatment setting.

Accuracy of surface-guided patient setup for conventional radiotherapy of brain and nasopharynx cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) in cranial patient setup by direct comparison between optical surface imaging (OSI) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), before applying SGRT-only setup for conventional radiotherapy of brain and nasopharynx cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using CBCT as reference, SGRT setup accuracy was examined based on 269 patients (415 treatments) treated with frameless cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) during 2018-2019. Patients were immobilized in customized head molds and open-face masks and monitored using OSI during treatment. The facial skin area in planning CT was used as OSI region of interest (ROI) for automatic surface alignment and the skull was used as the landmark for automatic CBCT/CT registration. A 6 degrees of freedom (6DOF) couch was used. Immediately after CBCT setup, an OSI verification image was captured, recording the SGRT setup differences. These differences were analyzed in 6DOFs and as a function of isocenter positions away from the anterior surface to assess OSI-ROI bias. The SGRT in-room setup time was estimated and compared with CBCT and orthogonal 2D kilovoltage (2DkV) setups. RESULTS: The SGRT setup difference (magnitude) is found to be 1.0 ± 2.5 mm and 0.1˚±1.4˚ on average among 415 treatments and within 5 mm/3˚ with greater than 95% confidence level (P < 0.001). Outliers were observed for very-posterior isocenters: 15 differences (3.6%) are >5.0mm and 9 (2.2%) are >3.0˚. The setup differences show minor correlations (|r| < 0.45) between translational and rotational DOFs and a minor increasing trend (<1.0 mm) in the anterior-to-posterior direction. The SGRT setup time is 0.8 ± 0.3 min, much shorter than CBCT (5 ± 2 min) and 2DkV (2 ± 1 min) setups. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that SGRT has sufficient accuracy for fast in-room patient setup and allows real-time motion monitoring for beam holding during treatment, potentially useful to guide radiotherapy of brain and nasopharynx cancer with standard fractionation.

A self-checking treatment couch coordinate calculation system in radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Traditionally, the treatment couch coordinates (TCCs) for patients undergoing radiotherapy can only be determined at the time of treatment, placing pressure on the treating therapists and leaving several pathways for errors such as wrong-site treatment or wrong treatment table shift from a reference point. The purpose of this work is to propose an accurate, robust, and streamlined system that calculates TCC in advance. METHODS: The proposed system combines the advantages of two different calculation methods that use an indexed immobilization device. The first method uses an array of reference ball bearings (BBs) embedded in the CT scanner's couch-top. To obtain the patient-specific TCC, the spatial offset of the treatment planning isocenter from the reference BB is used. The second method performs a calculation using the one-to-one mapping relationship between the CT scanner's DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) coordinate system and the TCC system. Both methods use a reference point in the CT coordinate system to correlate a point in the TCC system to perform the coordinate transfer between the two systems. Both methods were used to calculate the TCC and the results were checked against each other, creating an integrated workflow via automated self-checking. The accuracy of the calculation system was retrospectively evaluated with 275 patients, where the actual treatment position determined with cone-beam CT was used as a reference. RESULTS: An efficient workflow transparent to the therapists at both CT simulation and treatment was created. It works with any indexed immobilization device and can be universally applied to all treatment sites. The two methods had comparable accuracy, with 95% of the calculations within 3 mm. The inter-fraction variation was within ± 1.0 cm for 95% of the coordinates across all the treatment sites. CONCLUSIONS: A robust, accurate, and streamlined system was implemented to calculate TCCs in advance. It eases the pressure on the treating therapists, reduces patient setup time, and enhances the patient safety by preventing setup errors.

Quantifying the impact of optical surface guidance in the treatment of cancers of the head and neck.

Surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) is increasingly being adopted for use in radiation treatment delivery for Head and Neck (H&N) cancer patients. This study investigated the improvement of patient setup accuracy and reduction of setup time for SGRT compared to a conventional setup. A total of 60 H&N cancer patients were retrospectively included. Patients were categorized into three groups: oral cavity, oropharynx and nasopharynx/sinonasal sites with 20 patients in each group. They were further separated into two (2) subgroups, depending on whether they were set up with the aid of SGRT. The Align-RT™ system was used for SGRT in this work. Positioning was confirmed by daily kV-kV imaging in conjunction with weekly CBCT scans. Translational and rotational couch shifts along with patient setup times were recorded. Imaging setup time, which was defined as the elapsed time from the acquisition of the first image set to the end of the last image set, was recorded. Average translational shifts were larger in the non-SGRT group. Vertical shifts showed the most significant reduction in the SGRT group for both oropharynx and oral cavity groups. Pitch corrections were significantly higher in the SGRT group for oropharynx patients and higher pitch corrections were also observed in the SGRT groups of oral cavity and nasopharynx/sinonasal patients. The average setup time when SGRT guidance was employed was shorter for all three treatment sites although this did not reach statistical significance. The largest time reduction between the SGRT and non-SGRT groups was seen in the nasopharynx/sinonasal group. This study suggests that the use of SGRT decreases the magnitude of translational couch shifts during patient setup. However, the rotational corrections needed were generally higher with SGRT group. When SGRT was employed, a definite reduction in patient setup time was observed for nasopharynx/sinonasal and hypopharynx cancer patients.

Impact of use of optical surface imaging on initial patient setup for stereotactic body radiotherapy treatments.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of surface image guidance (SG) for pre-imaging setup of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) patients, and to investigate the impact of SG reference surface selection on this process. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 284 SBRT fractions (SG-SBRT = 113, non-SG-SBRT = 171) were retrospectively evaluated. Differences between initial (pre-imaging) and treatment couch positions were extracted from the record-and-verify system and compared for the two groups. Rotational setup discrepancies were also computed. The utility of orthogonal kVs in reducing CBCT shifts in the SG-SBRT/non-SG-SBRT groups was also calculated. Additionally, the number of CBCTs acquired for setup was recorded and the average for each cohort was compared. These data served to evaluate the effectiveness of surface imaging in pre-imaging patient positioning and its potential impact on the necessity of including orthogonal kVs for setup. Since reference surface selection can affect SG setup, daily surface reproducibility was estimated by comparing camera-acquired surface references (VRT surface) at each fraction to the external surface of the planning CT (DICOM surface) and to the VRT surface from the previous fraction. RESULTS: The reduction in all initial-to-treatment translation/rotation differences when using SG-SBRT was statistically significant (Rank-Sum test, α = 0.05). Orthogonal kV imaging kept CBCT shifts below reimaging thresholds in 19%/51% of fractions for SG-SBRT/non-SG-SBRT cohorts. Differences in average number of CBCTs acquired were not statistically significant. The reference surface study found no statistically significant differences between the use of DICOM or VRT surfaces. CONCLUSIONS: SG-SBRT improved pre-imaging treatment setup compared to in-room laser localization alone. It decreased the necessity of orthogonal kV imaging prior to CBCT but did not affect the average number of CBCTs acquired for setup. The selection of reference surface did not have a significant impact on initial patient positioning.

Automatic patient positioning and gating window settings in respiratory-gated stereotactic body radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer using fluoroscopic imaging.

Before treatment delivery of respiratory-gated radiation therapy (RT) in patients with implanted fiducials, both the patient position and the gating window thresholds must be set. In linac-based RT, this is currently done manually and setup accuracy will therefore be dependent on the skill of the user. In this study, we present an automatic method for finding the patient position and the gating window thresholds. Our method uses sequentially acquired anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral fluoroscopic imaging with simultaneous breathing amplitude monitoring and intends to reach 100% gating accuracy while keeping the duty cycle as high as possible. We retrospectively compared clinically used setups to the automatic setups by our method in five pancreatic cancer patients treated with hypofractionated RT. In 15 investigated fractions, the average (±standard deviation) differences between the clinical and automatic setups were -0.4 ± 0.8 mm, -1.0 ± 1.1 mm, and 1.8 ± 1.3 mm in the left-right (LR), the AP, and the superior-inferior (SI) direction, respectively. For the clinical setups, typical interfractional setup variations were 1-2 mm in the LR and AP directions, and 2-3 mm in the SI direction. Using the automatic method, the duty cycle could be improved in six fractions, in four fractions the duty cycle had to be lowered to improve gating accuracy, and in five fractions both duty cycle and gating accuracy could be improved. Our automatic method has the potential to increase accuracy and decrease user dependence of setup for patients with implanted fiducials treated with respiratory-gated RT. After fluoroscopic image acquisition, the calculated patient shifts and gating window thresholds are calculated in 1-2 s. The method gives the user the possibility to evaluate the effect of different patient positions and gating window thresholds on gating accuracy and duty cycle. If deemed necessary, it can be used at any time during treatment delivery.

Comparison of initial patient setup accuracy between surface imaging and three point localization: A retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: Historically, the process of positioning a patient prior to imaging verification used a set of permanent patient marks, or tattoos, placed subcutaneously. After aligning to these tattoos, plan specific shifts are applied and the position is verified with imaging, such as cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Due to a variety of factors, these marks may deviate from the desired position or it may be hard to align the patient to these marks. Surface-based imaging systems are an alternative method of verifying initial positioning with the entire skin surface instead of tattoos. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the CBCT-based 3D corrections of patients initially positioned with tattoos against those positioned with the C-RAD CatalystHD surface imager system. METHODS: A total of 6000 individual fractions (600-900 per site per method) were randomly selected and the post-CBCT 3D corrections were calculated and recorded. For both positioning methods, four common treatment site combinations were evaluated: pelvis/lower extremities, abdomen, chest/upper extremities, and breast. Statistical differences were evaluated using a paired sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test with significance level of <0.01. RESULTS: The average magnitudes of the 3D shift vectors for tattoos were 0.9 ± 0.4 cm, 1.0 ± 0.5 cm, 0.9 ± 0.6 cm and 1.4 ± 0.7 cm for the pelvis/lower extremities, abdomen, chest/upper extremities and breast, respectively. For the CatalystHD, the average magnitude of the 3D shifts for the pelvis/lower extremities, abdomen, chest/upper extremities and breast were 0.6 ± 0.3 cm, 0.5 ± 0.3 cm, 0.5 ± 0.3 cm and 0.6 ± 0.2 cm, respectively. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.01) in the 3D shift vectors were found for all four sites. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the overall 3D shift corrections for patients initially aligned with the C-RAD CatalystHD were significantly smaller than those aligned with subcutaneous tattoos. Surface imaging systems can be considered a viable option for initial patient setup and may be preferable to permanent marks for specific clinics and patients.

Analysis of precision in tumor tracking based on optical positioning system during radiotherapy.

Tumor tracking is performed during patient set-up and monitoring of respiratory motion in radiotherapy. In the clinical setting, there are several types of equipment for this set-up such as the Electronic Portal imaging Device (EPID) and Cone Beam CT (CBCT). Technically, an optical positioning system tracks the difference between the infra ball reflected from body and machine isocenter. Our objective is to compare the clinical positioning error of patient setup between Cone Beam CT (CBCT) with the Optical Positioning System (OPS), and to evaluate the traditional positioning systems and OPS based on our proposed approach of patient positioning. In our experiments, a phantom was used, and we measured its setup errors in three directions. Specifically, the deviations in the left-to-right (LR), anterior-to-posterior (AP) and inferior-to-superior (IS) directions were measured by vernier caliper on a graph paper using the Varian Linear accelerator. Then, we verified the accuracy of OPS based on this experimental study. In order to verify the accuracy of phantom experiment, 40 patients were selected in our radiotherapy experiment. To illustrate the precise of optical positioning system, we designed clinical trials using EPID. From our radiotherapy procedure, we can conclude that OPS has higher precise than conventional positioning methods, and is a comparatively fast and efficient positioning method with respect to the CBCT guidance system.

Effects of remedies made in patient setup process on residual setup errors and margins in head and neck cancer radiotherapy based on 2D image guidance.

AIM: Patient setup errors were aimed to be reduced in radiotherapy (RT) of head-and-neck (H&N) cancer. Some remedies in patient setup procedure were proposed for this purpose. BACKGROUND: RT of H&N cancer has challenges due to patient rotation and flexible anatomy. Residual position errors occurring in treatment situation and required setup margins were estimated for relevant bony landmarks after the remedies made in setup process and compared with previous results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The formation process for thermoplastic masks was improved. Also image matching was harmonized to the vertebrae in the middle of the target and a 5 mm threshold was introduced for immediate correction of systematic errors of the landmarks. After the remedies, residual position errors of bony landmarks were retrospectively determined from 748 orthogonal X-ray images of 40 H&N cancer patients. The landmarks were the vertebrae C1-2, C5-7, the occiput bone and the mandible. The errors include contributions from patient rotation, flexible anatomy and inter-observer variation in image matching. Setup margins (3D) were calculated with the Van Herk formula. RESULTS: Systematic residual errors of the landmarks were reduced maximally by 49.8% (p ≤ 0.05) and the margins by 3.1 mm after the remedies. With daily image guidance the setup margins of the landmarks were within 4.4 mm, but larger margins of 6.4 mm were required for the mandible. CONCLUSIONS: Remarkable decrease in the residual errors of the bony landmarks and setup margins were achieved through the remedies made in the setup process. The importance of quality assurance of the setup process was demonstrated.

The Usefulness of a Virtual Environment-Based Patient Setup Training System for Radiation Therapy.

In radiation therapy, patient setup is important for improving treatment accuracy. The six-axis couch semi-automatically adjusts the patient's position; however, adjusting the patient to twist is difficult. In this study, we developed and evaluated a virtual reality setup training tool for medical students to understand and improve their patient setup skills for radiation therapy. First, we set up a simulated patient in a virtual space to reproduce the radiation treatment room. A gyro sensor was attached to the patient phantom in real space, and the twist of the phantom was linked to the patient in the virtual space. Training was conducted for 24 students, and their operation records were analyzed and evaluated. The training's efficacy was also evaluated through questionnaires provided at the end of the training. The total time required for patient setup tests before and after training decreased significantly from 331.9 s to 146.2 s. As a result of the questionnaire regarding the usability of training to the trainee, most were highly evaluated. We found that training significantly improved students' understanding of the patient setup. With the proposed system, trainees can experience a simulated setup that can aid in deepening their understanding of radiation therapy treatments.

Utility of a skin marker-less setup procedure using surface-guided imaging: a comparison with the traditional laser-based setup in extremity irradiation.

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of a skin marker-less patient setup using a surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) system for extremity radiotherapy. Twenty-five patients who underwent radiotherapy to the extremities were included in this retrospective study. The first group consisted of 10 patients and underwent a traditional setup procedure using skin marks and lasers. The second group comprised 15 patients and had a skin marker-less setup procedure that used an SGRT system only. To compare the two setup procedures for setup accuracy, the mean 3D vector shift magnitude was 0.9 mm for the traditional setup procedure and 0.5 mm for the skin marker-less setup procedure (p < 0.01). In addition, SGRT systems have been suggested to improve the accuracy and reproducibility of patient setups and consistently reduce interfractional setup errors. These results indicate that a skin marker-less patient setup procedure using an SGRT system is useful for extremity irradiation.

Optimizing Gantry Breakpoint Angles in Proton Therapy: Enhancing Efficiency and Patient Experience.

Purpose: The breakpoint for a 360° radiotherapy gantry is typically positioned at 180°. This arbitrary setting has not been systematically evaluated for efficiency and may cause redundant gantry rotation and extended setup times. Our study aimed to identify an optimal gantry breakpoint angle for a full-gantry proton therapy system, with the goal of minimizing gantry movement. Materials and Methods: We analyzed 70 months of clinically delivered proton therapy plans (9152 plans, 131 883 fractions), categorizing them by treatment site and mapping the fields from a partial-gantry to full-gantry orientation. For each delivered fraction, we computed the minimum total gantry rotation angle as a function of gantry breakpoint position, which was varied between 0° and 360° in 1° steps. This analysis was performed separately within the entire plan cohort and individual treatment sites, both with and without the capability of over-rotating 10° past the breakpoint from either direction (20° overlap). The optimal gantry breakpoint was identified as one which resulted in a low average gantry rotation per fraction. Results: Considering mechanical constraints, 130° was identified as a reasonable balance between increased gantry-rotation efficiency and practical treatment considerations. With a 20° overlap, this selection reduced the average gantry rotation by 41.4° per fraction when compared to the standard 180° breakpoint. Disease site subgroups showed the following reduction in average gantry rotation: gastrointestinal 192.2°, thoracic 56.3°, pediatric 44.9°, genitourinary 19.9°, central nervous system 10.7°, breast 2.8°, and head and neck 0.1°. Conclusion: For a full-gantry system, a breakpoint of 130° generally outperforms the conventional 180° breakpoint. This reduction is particularly impactful for gastrointestinal, pediatric, and thoracic sites, which constitute a significant proportion of cases at our center. The adjusted breakpoint could potentially streamline patient delivery, alleviate mechanical wear, and enhance treatment precision by reducing the likelihood of patient movement during delivery.

Use of a pressure sensor array for multifunctional patient monitoring in radiotherapy: A feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Modern radiotherapeutic techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy, require high-dose delivery precision. However, the precise localization of tumors during patient respiration remains a challenge. Therefore, it is essential to investigate effective methods for monitoring respiration to minimize potential complications. Despite several systems currently in clinical use, there are drawbacks, including the complexity of the setup, the discomfort to the patient, and the high cost. PURPOSE: This study investigated the feasibility of using a novel pressure sensor array (PSA) as a tool to monitor respiration during radiotherapy treatments. The PSA was positioned between the treatment couch and the back of the patient lying on it and was intended to overcome some limitations of current methods. The main objectives included assessing the PSA's capability in monitoring respiratory behavior and to investigate prospective applications that extend beyond respiratory monitoring. METHODS: A PSA with 31 pressure-sensing elements was used in 12 volunteers. The participants were instructed to breathe naturally while lying on a couch without any audio or visual guidance. The performance of the PSA was compared to that of a camera-based respiratory monitoring system (RPM, Varian, USA), which served as a reference. Several metrics, including pressure distribution, weight sensitivity, and correlations between PSA and RPM signals, were analyzed. The PSA's capacity to provide information on potential applications related to patient stability was also investigated. RESULTS: The linear relationship between the weight applied to the PSA and its output was demonstrated in this study, confirming its sensitivity to pressure changes. A comparison of PSA and RPM curves revealed a high correlation coefficient of 0.9391 on average, indicating consistent respiratory cycles. The PSA also effectively measured the weight distribution at the volunteer's back in real-time, which allows for monitoring the patient's movements during the radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: PSA is a promising candidate for effective respiratory monitoring during radiotherapy treatments. Its performance is comparable to the established RPM system, and its additional capabilities suggest its multifaceted utility. This paper shows the potential use of PSA for patient monitoring in radiotherapy and suggests possibilities for further research, including performance comparisons with other existing systems and real-patient applications with respiratory training.

Multi-institutional investigation into the robustness of intra-cranial multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery plans to patient setup errors.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyse correlations between planning factors including plan geometry and plan complexity with robustness to patient setup errors. METHODS: Multiple-target brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plans were obtained through the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) international treatment planning challenge (2018). The challenge dataset consisted of five intra-cranial targets with a 20 Gy prescription. Setup error was simulated using an in-house tool. Dose to targets was assessed via dose covering 99 % (D99 %) of gross tumour volume (GTV) and 98 % of planning target volume (PTV). Dose to organs at risk was assessed using volume of normal brain receiving 12 Gy and maximum dose covering 0.03 cc of brainstem. Plan complexity was assessed via edge metric, modulation complexity score, mean multi-leaf collimator (MLC) gap, mean MLC speed and plan modulation. RESULTS: Even for small (0.5 mm/°) errors, GTV D99 % was reduced by up to 20 %. The strongest correlation was found between lower complexity plans (larger mean MLC gap and lower edge metric) and higher robustness to setup error. Lower complexity plans had 1 %-20 % fewer targets/scenarios with GTV D99 % falling below the specified tolerance threshold. These complexity metrics correlated with 100 % isodose volume sphericity and dose conformity, though similar conformity was achievable with a range of complexities. CONCLUSIONS: A higher level of importance should be directed towards plan complexity when considering plan robustness. It is recommended when planning multi-target SRS, larger MLC gaps and lower MLC aperture irregularity be considered during plan optimisation due to higher robustness should patient positioning errors occur.

Assessing inter and intrafraction uncertainties in adult brain cancer patients using 2D/3D kV and CBCT imaging.

METHOD: 2D/3D kV imaging and CBCT data using 6 degrees of freedom (6DoF) were compared to evaluate inter and intrafraction motion. RESULTS: Results showed that intrafraction errors were low and interfraction levels were within institutional protocols. CONCLUSION: Confidence was given to use low dose 2D/3D kV imaging to confirm daily patient set up errors, and to use pre-treatment CBCT only once weekly for additional imaging information. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Further research is necessary to assess other uncertainties, to enable the calculation of a margin and determining the feasibility of further reduction of this.

Feasibility of a Novel Surface-Guided Setup Technique to Reproduce Neck Curvature Using two Regions of Interest.

PURPOSE: To improve the setup reproducibility of neck curvature using real-time optical surface imaging (OSI) guidance on 2 regions of interest (ROIs) to infer cervical spine (c-spine) curvature for surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) of head-and-neck (HN) and c-spine cancer. METHODS: A novel SGRT setup approach was designed to reproduce neck curvature with 2 ROIs: upper-chest ROI and open-face ROI. It was hypothesized that the neck curvature could be reproduced if both ROIs were aligned within ±3 mm/2˚ tolerance. This was tested prospectively in 7 volunteers using real-time 3D-OSI guidance and lateral 2D-photography verification after the 3D and 2D references were captured from the initial conventional setup. Real-time SGRT was performed to align chest-ROI and face-ROI, and the longitudinal distance between them was adjustable using a head-support slider. Verification of neck curvature anteriorly and posteriorly was achieved by overlaying edge-extracted lateral pictures. Retrospectively, the relationship between anterior surface and spinal canal alignment was checked in 11 patients using their simulation CT (simCT) and setup cone-beam CT (CBCT). After the anterior surface was rigidly aligned, the spinal canal alignment was checked and quantified using the mean-distance-to-agreement (MDA) and DICE similarity index, and surface-to-spine correlation was calculated. RESULTS: The reproducibility of neck curvatures using the 2xROI SGRT setup is verified and the mean neck-outline-matching difference is within ±2 mm in lateral photographic overlays. The chest-ROI alignment takes 110 ± 58 s and the face-ROI takes 60 ± 35 s. When the anterior body surface is aligned (MDA = 1.1 ± 0.6 mm, DICE = 0.96 ± 0.02,) the internal spinal canal is also aligned (MDA = 1.0 ± 0.3 mm, DICE = 0.84 ± 0.04) in 11 patients. The surface-to-spine correlation is c = 0.90 (MDA) and c = 0.85 (DICE). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of the novel 2-ROI SGRT setup technique to achieve reproducible neck and c-spine curvature regardless of neck visibility and availability as ROI. Staff training is needed to adopt this unconventional SGRT technique to improve patient setup.

A new system for in-room image guidance in particle therapy at CNAO.

This paper describes the design, installation, and commissioning of an in-room imaging device developed at the Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO, Pavia, Italy). The system is an upgraded version of the one previously installed in 2014, and its design accounted for the experience gained in a decade of clinical practice of patient setup verification and correction through robotic-supported, off-isocenter in-room image guidance. The system's basic feature consists of image-based setup correction through 2D/3D and 3D/3D registration through a dedicated HW/SW platform. The major update with respect to the device already under clinical usage resides in the implementation of a functionality for extending the field of view of the reconstructed Cone Beam CT (CBCT) volume, along with improved overall safety and functional optimization. We report here details on the procedures implemented for system calibration under all imaging modalities and the results of the technical and preclinical commissioning of the device performed on two different phantoms. In the technical commissioning, specific attention was given to the assessment of the accuracy with which the six-degrees-of-freedom correction vector computed at the off-isocenter imaging position was propagated to the planned isocentric irradiation geometry. During the preclinical commissioning, the entire clinical-like procedure for detecting and correcting imposed, known setup deviation was tested on an anthropomorphic radioequivalent phantom. Results showed system performance within the sub-millimeter and sub-degree range according to project specifications under each imaging modality, making it ready for clinical application.

Evaluation of initial patient setup methods for breast cancer between surface-guided radiation therapy and laser alignment based on skin marking in the Halcyon system.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficiency and accuracy of the daily patient setup for breast cancer patients by applying surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) using the Halcyon system instead of conventional laser alignment based on the skin marking method. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively investigated 228 treatment fractions using two different initial patient setup methods. The accuracy of the residual rotational error of the SGRT system was evaluated by using an in-house breast phantom. The residual translational error was analyzed using the couch position difference in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions between the reference computed tomography and daily kilo-voltage cone beam computed tomography acquired from the record and verification system. The residual rotational error (pitch, yaw, and roll) was also calculated using an auto rigid registration between the two images based on Velocity. The total setup time, which combined the initial setup time and imaging time, was analyzed to evaluate the efficiency of the daily patient setup for SGRT. RESULTS: The average residual rotational errors using the in-house fabricated breast phantom for pitch, roll, and yaw were 0.14°, 0.13°, and 0.29°, respectively. The average differences in the couch positions for laser alignment based on the skin marking method were 2.7 ± 1.6 mm, 2.0 ± 1.2 mm, and 2.1 ± 1.0 mm for the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. For SGRT, the average differences in the couch positions were 1.9 ± 1.2 mm, 2.9 ± 2.1 mm, and 1.9 ± 0.7 mm for the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. The rotational errors for pitch, yaw, and roll without the surface-guided radiation therapy approach were 0.32 ± 0.30°, 0.51 ± 0.24°, and 0.29 ± 0.22°, respectively. For SGRT, the rotational errors were 0.30 ± 0.22°, 0.51 ± 0.26°, and 0.19 ± 0.13°, respectively. The average total setup times considering both the initial setup time and imaging time were 314 s and 331 s, respectively, with and without SGRT. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that using SGRT improves the accuracy and efficiency of initial patient setups in breast cancer patients using the Halcyon system, which has limitations in correcting the rotational offset.

Application of surface-guided radiation therapy in prostate cancer: comparative analysis of differences with skin marking-guided patient setup.

PURPOSE: Surface-guided radiation therapy is an image-guided method using optical surface imaging that has recently been adopted for patient setup and motion monitoring during treatment. We aimed to determine whether the surface guide setup is accurate and efficient compared to the skin-marking guide in prostate cancer treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The skin-marking setup was performed, and vertical, longitudinal, and lateral couch values (labeled as "M") were recorded. Subsequently, the surface-guided setup was conducted, and couch values (labeled as "S") were recorded. After performing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), the final couch values was recorded (labeled as "C"), and the shift value was calculated (labeled as "Gap (M-S)," "Gap (M-C)," "Gap (S-C)") and then compared. Additionally, the setup times for the skin marking and surface guides were also compared. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-five patients were analyzed, totaling 2,735 treatment fractions. Gap (M-S) showed minimal differences in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral averages (-0.03 cm, 0.07 cm, and 0.06 cm, respectively). Gap (M-C) and Gap (S-C) exhibited a mean difference of 0.04 cm (p = 0.03) in the vertical direction, a mean difference of 0.35 cm (p = 0.52) in the longitudinal direction, and a mean difference of 0.11 cm (p = 0.91) in the lateral direction. There was no correlation between shift values and patient characteristics. The average setup time of the skin-marking guide was 6.72 minutes, and 7.53 minutes for the surface guide. CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference between the surface and skin-marking guides regarding final CBCT shift values and no correlation between translational shift values and patient characteristics. We also observed minimal difference in setup time between the two methods. Therefore, the surface guide can be considered an accurate and time-efficient alternative to skin-marking guides.