Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
AIDS Behav ; 28(6): 1845-1857, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38457051

RESUMO

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) reduces sexual risk for HIV transmission by 99% when used appropriately, but remains underutilized among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM). In this mixed-method study, we describe reasons for PrEP refusal associated with low self-perceived need for PrEP among MSM who recently declined daily oral PrEP when offered by a provider. Data are from a quantitative behavioral survey of MSM (N = 93) living in Atlanta, Chicago, and Raleigh-Durham, who also either responded to an in-depth interview (n = 51) or participated in one of 12 focus groups (n = 42). Themes of low self-perceived need for PrEP were: low self-perceived risk for HIV acquisition (33% of respondents); confidence in remaining HIV-negative (35%); using condoms (81%); limiting number of partners and choosing partners carefully (48%); asking partners about their HIV status before having sex (45%); engaging in safer sexual positions or oral sex (28%); being in a monogamous relationship or exclusivity with one partner (26%); and regular HIV testing (18%). Low self-perceived risk for HIV acquisition and high confidence in other prevention strategies were important factors related to low self-perceived need in MSM refusing daily oral PrEP when offered. Providers should continue to discuss the benefits of PrEP as a safe and highly effective option for HIV prevention.


RESUMEN: La profilaxis pre-exposición (PrEP) reduce el riesgo de transmisión sexual por el VIH en un 99% cuando se utiliza apropiadamente, pero sigue siendo subutilizada entre hombres gais, bisexuales y otros hombres que tienen sexo con hombres (HSH). En este estudio de método mixto, describimos los motivos del rechazo de la PrEP asociados a la baja necesidad autopercibida de la PrEP entre los HSH que recientemente rechazaron la PrEP oral diaria, cuando fue ofrecida por un proveedor de salud. Los datos provienen de una encuesta cuantitativa de comportamiento de los HSH (N = 93) que viven en Atlanta, Chicago y Raleigh-Durham, quienes también respondieron a una entrevista en profundidad (n = 51) o participaron en uno de los 12 grupos focales (n = 42). Los temas de baja necesidad autopercibida del uso de la PrEP fueron: el bajo riesgo auto percibido de contraer el VIH (33% de los encuestados); la confianza en seguir siendo VIH negativo (35%); utilizar condones (81%); limitar el número de parejas sexuales y elegir las parejas cuidadosamente (48%); preguntar a sus parejas sobre su estado de VIH antes de tener relaciones sexuales (45%); participar en posiciones sexuales más seguras o sexo oral (28%); estar en relación monógama o de exclusividad con una sola pareja (26%); y hacerse pruebas del VIH regularmente (18%). El bajo riesgo autopercibido de contraer el VIH y la alta confianza en otras estrategias de prevención fueron factores importantes relacionados con la baja necesidad autopercibida en los HSH que rechazaron la PrEP oral diaria cuando se les ofreció. Los proveedores de salud deben continuar el diálogo sobre los beneficios de la PrEP como una opción segura y altamente eficaz para la prevención del VIH.


Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV , Grupos Focais , Infecções por HIV , Homossexualidade Masculina , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Parceiros Sexuais , Humanos , Masculino , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Homossexualidade Masculina/psicologia , Homossexualidade Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagem , Chicago , Comportamento Sexual , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/psicologia , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Entrevistas como Assunto , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/psicologia , Adulto Jovem , Estados Unidos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Assunção de Riscos , Autoimagem
2.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1470, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38822308

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Associations between perceived and actual risk of HIV infection and HIV prevention services uptake are inconclusive. This study aimed to evaluate the discrepancy between the perceived and actual HIV risk, and quantify the associations between perceived and actual risk of HIV infection and three HIV prevention services utilization among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Shandong province, China. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Shandong province in June 2021. Participants were eligible if they were born biologically male, aged 18 years or older, had negative or unknown HIV status, and had sex with men in the past year. Participants were recruited online. The discrepancy between their perceived and actual risk of HIV infection was evaluated by calculating the Kappa value. Bayesian model averaging was used to assess the associations between perceived and actual risk of HIV infection and HIV prevention services uptake. RESULTS: A total of 1136 MSM were recruited, most of them were 30 years old or younger (59.9%), single (79.5%), with at least college education level (74.7%). Most participants (97.4%) perceived that they had low risk of HIV infection, and 14.1% were assessed with high actual risk. The discrepancy between their perceived and actual risk of HIV infection was evaluated with a Kappa value of 0.076 (P < 0.001). HIV testing uptake had a weak association with perceived high HIV prevalence among social networks (aOR = 1.156, post probability = 0.547). The perceived high HIV prevalence among national MSM was positive related to willingness to use PrEP (aOR = 1.903, post probability = 0.943) and PEP (aOR = 1.737, post probability = 0.829). Perceived personal risk (aOR = 4.486, post probability = 0.994) and perceived HIV prevalence among social networks (aOR = 1.280, post probability = 0.572) were related to history of using PrEP. Perceived personal risk (aOR = 3.144, post probability = 0.952), actual risk (aOR = 1.890, post probability = 0.950), and perceived risk among social networks (aOR = 1.502, post probability = 0.786) were related to history of using PEP. CONCLUSIONS: There is discordance between perceived and actual personal risk of HIV infection among MSM in China. HIV risk assessment and education on HIV prevalence among MSM should be strengthened to assist high-risk populations aware their risk accurately and hence access HIV prevention services proactively.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Homossexualidade Masculina , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , China/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Adulto , Homossexualidade Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , Homossexualidade Masculina/psicologia , Adulto Jovem , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Adolescente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
AIDS Behav ; 25(2): 582-591, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32886220

RESUMO

Black women contract HIV at much higher rates than White or Hispanic women. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an underutilized prevention tool among this population. We sought to determine participants' interest in PrEP and facilitators and barriers to PrEP adoption. This longitudinal, qualitative study included 30 Black women (Mage = 32.2) interviewed 4 times over 6 months. Most participants had never heard of PrEP and a majority expressed initial interest. Barriers to PrEP initiation included low perceived HIV risk, medical mistrust, provider experiences and knowledge, negative reactions from family and friends, low perceived efficacy to adherence, and transportation. This study demonstrated actual, rather than hypothetical, PrEP interest and attitudes among Black women, and the barriers that arose over time during the study. PrEP awareness needs to be promoted among Black women and medical providers. Future research should address individual risk perception, medical mistrust, increasing social support, and decreasing transportation barriers.


RESUMEN: Las mujeres negras contraen el VIH en tasas mucho más altas que las mujeres blancas o hispanas. La profilaxis de preexposición al VIH (PrEP) es una herramienta de prevención infrautilizada entre esta población. Buscamos determinar el interés de las participantes en la PrEP y los facilitadores y las barreras para la adopción de la PrEP. Este estudio longitudinal y cualitativo incluyó a 30 mujeres negras (Mage = 32,2) entrevistadas 4 veces durante 6 meses. La mayoría de las participantes nunca habían oído hablar de la PrEP y la mayoría expresó un interés inicial. Las barreras para el inicio de la PrEP incluyeron un bajo riesgo percibido de VIH, desconfianza médica, experiencias y conocimientos del proveedor, reacciones negativas de familiares y amigos, baja eficacia percibida para la adherencia, y transporte. Este estudio demostró intereses y actitudes reales, más que hipotéticos, sobre la PrEP entre las mujeres negras, y las barreras que surgieron con el tiempo durante el estudio. Se debe promover la concienciación sobre la PrEP entre las mujeres negras y los proveedores médicos. Las investigaciones futuras deben abordar la percepción del riesgo individual, la desconfianza médica, el aumento del apoyo social, y la disminución de las barreras del transporte.


Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV , Infecções por HIV , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Criança , Atenção à Saúde , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Apoio Social , Confiança
4.
AIDS Behav ; 25(3): 748-757, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32940826

RESUMO

In Brazil, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is currently available for gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. As PrEP use depends on an individual's perceived risk, we explored pathways by which potentially modifiable behaviors lead to high perceived HIV risk. Using online surveys (N = 16,667), we conducted a path analysis on the basis of ordered sequences of multivariate logistic regressions. High perceived HIV risk was low (26.3%) compared to condomless receptive anal sex (41.4%). While younger age increased the odds of binge drinking and of condomless receptive anal sex, it was associated with decreased odds of high perceived HIV risk. In contrast, use of stimulants increased the odds of condomless receptive anal sex and of high perceived HIV risk. Our results suggest that binge drinking and use of stimulants are key points in different pathways to high-risk sexual behavior and may lead to different perceptions of HIV risk.


RESUMEN: En Brasil, la profilaxis previa a la exposición (PrEP) está disponible actualmente para hombres homosexuales, bisexuales y otros hombres que tienen sexo con hombres. Como el uso de PrEP depende del riesgo percibido de una persona, exploramos vías por las cuales los comportamientos potencialmente modificables conducen a un alto riesgo percibido de VIH. Utilizando datos de encuestas en línea (N = 16.667), realizamos un análisis de ruta sobre la base de secuencias ordenadas de regresiones logísticas multivariadas. El alto riesgo percibido de VIH fue bajo (26,3%) en comparación con el sexo anal receptivo sin condón (41,4%). La edad más joven aumentó las probabilidades de consumo de alcohol en exceso y del sexo anal receptivo sin condón, todavía se asoció con una menor probabilidad de alta percepción de riesgo sobre VIH. Sin embargo, el uso de estimulantes aumentó las probabilidades de tener sexo anal receptivo sin condón y de un alto riesgo percibido de VIH. Nuestros resultados sugieren que el consumo excesivo de alcohol y el uso de estimulantes son puntos clave en diferentes vías de conductas sexuales de alto riesgo y pueden llevar a diferentes percepciones del riesgo de VIH.


Assuntos
Consumo Excessivo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Preservativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Homossexualidade Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Consumo Excessivo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/complicações , Brasil/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Homossexualidade Masculina/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Comportamento Sexual , Parceiros Sexuais , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia
5.
AIDS Care ; 28(11): 1378-85, 2016 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27136725

RESUMO

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) reduces HIV acquisition. Our goal was to determine the willingness of men who have sex with men (MSM) to take PrEP given perceived and actual HIV risk. HIV-negative MSM were recruited from September 2010 to June 2012 and asked about PrEP willingness and perceived HIV risk. Actual sexual HIV risk was measured by three condom-use components generated through principal components analysis. General HIV risk was measured using the HIV Incidence Risk Index for MSM (HIRI-MSM). Model 1 measured PrEP willingness given perceived and actual sexual HIV risk. Model 2 included actual HIV sexual risk, perceived HIV risk and general HIV risk. Model 3 removed actual sexual HIV risk. We recruited 150 HIV-negative MSM. About 55% were willing to take PrEP. Reasons for PrEP unwillingness were: low perceived risk (64%), side-effect concerns (44%), daily pill burden (16%) and efficacy concerns (4%). Model 1: MSM with high compared to low actual sexual HIV risk were more willing to use PrEP (OR 27.11, 95% CI 1.33-554.43) after adjusting for perceived risk, which was not significantly associated with PrEP willingness (OR 4.79, 95% CI 0.72-31.96). Model 2: MSM with high compared to low actual sexual HIV risk were more willing to use PrEP (OR 29.85, 95% CI 1.39-640.53) after adjusting for perceived and general HIV risk, neither of which was significantly associated with PrEP willingness (OR 5.07, 95% CI 0.73-35.09) and (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.37-6.79), respectively. Model 3: After removing actual sexual HIV risk, MSM with high compared to low perceived risk were more willing to use PrEP (OR 6.85, 95% CI 1.23-38.05), and the HIRI-MSM general risk index was not associated with PrEP willingness (OR 1.87, 95% CI 0.54-6.54). Therefore, actual sexual HIV risk was the best predictor of PrEP willingness and general HIV risk did not inform PrEP willingness.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Homossexualidade Masculina , Modelos Estatísticos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Sexo sem Proteção , Adulto , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário , Percepção , Análise de Componente Principal , Medição de Risco
6.
Public Health Rep ; 134(1): 36-46, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30526313

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In the United States, all men who have sex with men (MSM) were banned from donating blood from 1985 through 2015. In 2016, the guideline was amended such that men who had sexual contact with other men within the previous 12 months could not donate blood. We aimed to identify blood donation practices and their relationship with HIV risk and testing among young adult MSM (YMSM) at risk for having HIV. METHODS: In 2014, we recruited HIV-negative non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic white YMSM aged 18-24 from across the United States through social media platforms to complete an online survey. Among these YMSM who previously donated blood, we conducted a secondary analysis examining the relationship between having donated blood within the past 12 months and sexual risk behavior from recent condomless anal intercourse (CAI), HIV testing, and self-perceived risk of having an undiagnosed HIV infection. RESULTS: Of the 2261 YMSM surveyed, 1104 (48.8%) had ever previously donated blood and 305 (13.5%) had donated blood within the past 12 months. Of the 305 blood donors, 50 (16.4%) had ever had CAI before their most recent blood donation. Among YMSM who donated blood, past-12-month blood donation was more likely among YMSM who never had CAI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-2.73) than among YMSM who had CAI and more likely among YMSM who believed it was not possible at all that they had an undiagnosed HIV infection (aOR = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.14-2.16) than among YMSM who believed there was any possibility of having an undiagnosed HIV infection; it was not related to past-12-month HIV testing. CONCLUSIONS: YMSM donated blood frequently, suggesting that the deferral process in place did not prevent YMSM from donating blood. The current donor screening process should be reconsidered if it is to prevent YMSM from donating blood. Future research could identify screening questions that permit YMSM with a low risk of HIV infection to donate blood while maintaining the safety of the blood supply.


Assuntos
Doadores de Sangue/psicologia , Infecções por HIV , Homossexualidade Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , Assunção de Riscos , Autoimagem , Comportamento Sexual/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Doadores de Sangue/provisão & distribuição , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Mídias Sociais , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA