[Comparison of penoscrotal and perineal approaches for implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter in man]. / Comparaison des voies d'abords peno-scrotales et perineales pour l'implantation d'un sphincter urinaire artificiel chez l'homme.

INTRODUCTION: Artificial urinary sphincter is considered the gold standard of treatment for male urinary incontinence because of intrinsic sphincter deficiency. The objective of our study was to compare the functional results and complications of the penoscrotal and perineal incision for the implantation of artificial urinary sphincter. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, monocentric study comparing the perioperative and long-term results of primary implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter in men, performed by the penoscrotal or the perineal incision, was conducted in a French university hospital. RESULTS: Between April 2004 and February 2019, 175 patients were implanted (118 by penoscrotal incision and 57 by perineal incision) by 19 surgeons. Cuff placement approach depended on surgeon preference. The average follow-up was 34.2 ± 35.6 months. Cuff size was smaller in the penoscrotal group (4 [4;5] vs 4.5[4;5] p<0.001). At the end of follow-up, the rates of complete continence, social continence, reintervention for any reason, explantation, and revision was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Long-term outcomes of penoscrotal and perineal artificial sphincter implantation were similar between the two groups. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to confirm these results.

Long-term follow-up for anorectal function after anorectoplasty in patients with high/intermediate imperforate anus: a single center experience.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and postoperative anorectal function in the patients with high/intermediate imperforate anus (HIA/IIA) treated in our institution. In addition, we report our novel procedure, laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty with anterior perineal incision (LAARP-API), which allows direct approach to the anterior edge of the puborectal sling and muscle complex, and is useful for the creation of a pulling-through route for the rectal pouch. METHODS: From 1976 to 2016, 22 patients with HIA and 43 patients with IIA underwent sacroperineal/sacroabdominoperineal pull-through anorectoplasty (SP/SAP), Potts procedure (Potts), SP with API (SP-API) or LAARP-API. Clinical data and anorectal function of those patients were retrospectively evaluated using the Japanese clinical score. RESULTS: Of the 22 cases of HIA, 15 were treated by SAP, 2 were SP and 5 were LAARP-API. Of the 43 cases of IIA, one was treated by SAP, 31 were SP, two were Potts and nine were SP-API. The mean score of anorectal function of HIA/IIA both increased with age. In IIA, the score after SP-API was significantly higher than the score after SP. CONCLUSION: Long-term outcomes of our anorectoplasty for HIA/IIA are good with excellent anorectal function score.

[Risk factor analysis for perineal incision complications after abdominoperineal resection in elderly patients with rectal cancer].

Objective: To evaluate the risk factors of perineal incision complications after abdominal abdominoperineal resection (APR) in elderly patients with rectal cancer. Methods: From January 2007 to September 2018, the clinical data of 72 elderly rectal cancer patients (age≥80 years) underwent abdominoperineal resection at Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the risk factors of perineal incision complications in elderly patients with rectal cancer after APR. Results: Of the 76 patients, 47 were male and 25 were female, with an average age of (81.8±1.8) years. The incidence of postoperative perineal incision complications was 23.6% (17/72), including 5 cases of wound infection, 4 cases of incision fat liquefaction, and 8 cases of delayed wound healing. All of the patients were well recovered and discharged without death. The result of univariate analysis showed that, the occurrence of perineal incision complications was associated with serum albumin level < 35g/L (χ(2)=4.860, P=0.027), intraperitoneal chemotherapy with fluorouracil sustained release/lobaplatin rinse (χ(2)=8.827, P=0.003), pelvic restoration (χ(2)=9.062, P=0.003), diabetes (χ(2)=6.387, P=0.011) and coronary heart disease (χ(2)=7.688, P=0.006). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the intraoperative pelvic restoration (OR=0.17, 95% CI: 0.04~0.82, P=0.027) and diabetes (OR=4.32, 95% CI: 1.05~17.81, P=0.043) were independent risk factors for perineal incision complications. Conclusions: Elderly patients with rectal cancer who undergo APR should preserve and restore the pelvic peritoneum as much as possible. Moreover, perioperative blood glucose monitoring is a powerful guarantee for preventing complications of perineal incision.

Factors related to episiotomy practice: an evidence-based medicine systematic review.

Episiotomy practice is influenced by many factors studied in the scientific literature. Evidence-based medicine has isolated many factors that are linked to episiotomy practice, thus creating a need to group all these factors to create a relevant and useful database for scientific research. Based on the PRISMA methodology, the authors conducted a systematic literature review with the aim of covering this very need. Using 12 French and English combinations of relevant keywords, 15 databases containing publications published between 2008 and 2018 were evaluated. A total of 63 articles were identified, grouped and categorised into four main themes in the results section: (1) Individual and clinical factors related to the mother, (2) individual and clinical factors related to the child, (3) technical factors, and (4) organisation of health care and professional factors (institutional, organisational, personal and professional factors). These factors are then presented in terms of their impact on the practice of episiotomy. Then the future implications of this study on scientific research and clinical practice are discussed.

[Prognosis factors for the perineal incision complications after abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer].

Objective: To evaluate the prognosis factors affecting perineal incision complications after abdominoperineal resection (APR) for the low rectal cancer. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 151 consecutive patients with low rectal cancer undergoing APR between January and December 2013 at Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. The patients were comprised of 95 males and 56 females. The mean age of the patients was (57.3±10.9) years (ranging from 31 to 79 years). χ(2) test and Logistic regression analysis were used to identify the prognosis factors of perineum incision complications. Results: In all 151 patients, perineal incision complications were confirmed in 31 patients (20.5%), including 8 cases of incision infection, 22 cases of poor healing of perineal wound, and 1 case of incision fistula formation. In univariate analysis, the factors associated with perineal incision complications were American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (χ(2)=7.116, P=0.008), intraoperative blood loss (χ(2)=9.157, P=0.002), while the protective factors associate with perineal incision complications were the intraperitoneal chemotherapy with fluorouracil sustained release (χ(2)=5.020, P=0.025), pelvic restoration (χ(2)=10.158, P=0.001), operation experience (χ(2)=7.334, P=0.007). The gender, age, body mass index, diabetes, preoperative radiochemtherapy, hemoglobin level, albumin level, distance from distal tumor to anal verge, the procedure of APR, operating time, intraoperative blood transfusion, total drainage volume 3 days after operation, tumor differentiation and the postoperative TNM staging were not associated with perineal incision complications (P>0.05). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the intraoperative pelvic restoration (OR=0.200, 95% CI: 0.045 to 0.894, P=0.035) and intraoperative blood loss (OR=2.953, 95% CI: 1.155 to 7.551, P=0.024) were independent prognosis factors of perineum incision complications. Conclusions: For patients with low rectal cancer undergoing APR procedure, pelvic restoration wound be needed. The operation should be performed by experienced doctors, intraoperative blood loss should be reduced when possible.

Anterior Perineal PlanE for ultra-low Anterior Resection of the rectum (APPEAR) technique: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The Anterior Perineal PlanE for ultra-low Anterior Resection of the rectum (APPEAR) technique utilises a perineal incision to facilitate resection of the distal rectum. The aim of this study was to review use of the APPEAR technique, assessing patient selection, indications, complications and outcomes, both oncological and functional. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was carried out to identify studies reporting outcomes following rectal resection via an anterior perineal incision, with no limits on year or language. All studies were included. Quality of studies was assessed using the methodological index for non-randomised studies (MINORS) score. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were identified from 1985 to 2013. 174 patients (102 male), ranging from 21 to 82 years, underwent surgery at eleven centres in seven countries. Maximum experience at one centre is 60 cases. 9 cases were performed for rectal dysplasia, 141 for rectal cancer; 96 resections were R0 (remaining 45 unstated). 14 cases were carried out laparoscopically. 30-day mortality was 2.3% (4 patients); there were 2 further deaths from systemic recurrence. Permanent stoma rate was 8/155 (5%). The most frequent complication was perineal or vaginal fistulation (26 patients): 6 underwent reoperation; 15 healed with conservative management; 5 required a permanent stoma. Functional outcomes were variably reported; median stool frequency was 3/24hrs with average Wexner scores of 5-5.5. CONCLUSION: In selected patients the APPEAR technique offers avoidance of permanent colostomy with good oncological outcomes. The majority of studies had short follow up periods and longer-term outcomes will need evaluation.