Group B Streptococcus Infection and Obstetric Hemorrhage Risk.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the association between GBS infection and maternal risk for obstetric hemorrhage (OBH) and OBH-related morbidities (OBH-M). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all deliveries with a documented GBS status at a single large academic medical center from 2018 to 2019. GBS status was determined by either urine culture or rectovaginal culture collected during the antepartum period. The primary outcomes were quantitative blood loss (QBL), OBH, and a composite of OBH-M. Secondary outcomes were individual components of the OBH-M composite and frequency of hemorrhage-related interventions utilized intrapartum and postpartum. A stratified analysis was conducted examining only patients who were diagnosed intrapartum with an intrapartum intraamniotic infection (III). RESULTS: Of 4679 pregnant individuals who delivered a live infant between January 1, 2018 and January 1,2019 with a documented GBS status, 1,487 were identified as GBS positive (+) and 3192 were identified as GBS negative (-). The GBS + group did not have significantly higher QBL (p = 0.29) or rate of OBH (p = 0.35). There were no significant differences by GBS status in OBH morbidity (p = 0.79) or its individual components or frequency of individual pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic OBHrelated interventions. There were also no significant differences by GBS status among patients with an III. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: GBS infection at the time of delivery was not associated with increased risk for OBH or OBH-M. Further research is needed to further explore the relationship between peripartum infections and OBH risk.

Association between intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus colonization and clinical chorioamnionitis among patients undergoing induction of labor at term.

BACKGROUND: Rectovaginal colonization with Group B Streptococcus during pregnancy has historically been shown to be associated with an increased risk of clinical chorioamnionitis and peripartum infectious morbidity. OBJECTIVE: Newer observational data in the era of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis suggest a possible reversal of this association; however, it is unclear if this is related to differences in labor management for those with and without Group B Streptococcus colonization. We therefore sought to assess the association between intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus colonization and clinical chorioamnionitis within the context of a randomized induction of labor trial with a standardized labor protocol. STUDY DESIGN: We performed an exploratory secondary analysis of a randomized trial of patients undergoing term induction at a tertiary care center. Patients received third trimester Group B Streptococcus screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis as routine care. Group B Streptococcus detection was performed using a carrot broth-enhanced subculture to Group B Streptococcus Detect approach (Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA). Labor management was protocolized per the trial. Patients with unknown Group B Streptococcus status or who did not receive intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, if indicated, were excluded. The primary outcome was diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis, compared between patients who received intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for known Group B Streptococcus positive status (by culture, history, or Group B Streptococcus bacteriuria) and those who were Group B Streptococcus negative and did not receive intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Secondary outcomes included postpartum endometritis, wound infection, a composite maternal peripartum infectious morbidity, and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 491 patients were enrolled in the trial. Of these, 466 had a known Group B Streptococcus status and received or did not receive intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis accordingly and were included in this analysis: 292 (62.7%) were Group B Streptococcus negative and did not receive intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, and 174 (37.3%) were Group B Streptococcus positive and received intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. The majority of patients were Non-Hispanic Black (78.1%) and nulliparous (59.7%). There were no differences in demographic, clinical, induction or labor characteristics between groups. Patients who were Group B Streptococcus positive had a 49% lower rate of clinical chorioamnionitis (8.1% vs 14.7%, odds ratio, 0.51; P=.03) and a lower rate of peripartum infectious morbidity (8.1% vs 15.8%, odds ratio, 0.47; P=.02) compared to those who were Group B Streptococcus negative. Infants born to patients who were Group B Streptococcus positive were significantly less likely to be admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (3.4% vs 15.1%, P<.001). CONCLUSION: Although Group B Streptococcus colonization has historically been considered a risk factor for clinical chorioamnionitis, in the era of universal antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus positive patients, our findings support the point that intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus positivity is associated with lower rates of clinical chorioamnionitis and peripartum infectious morbidity among patients undergoing induction with protocolized labor management. These findings demonstrate that intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus may protect against perinatal infectious morbidity, a phenomenon that warrants further investigation.

Postpartum Fusobacterium gonidiaformans bacteremia.

We present a case of a healthy 29 year-old female with an uneventful vaginal delivery who had transient, sudden onset of rigors and fever 36 hours postpartum. She was found to have Fusobacterium gonidiaformans bacteremia due to retained placental tissue. We report this organism as it is not well-described and rarely reported. It does bear some similarities to other Fusobacterium species that have been reported to cause septicemia in young otherwise healthy patients.

A Population-based Study of Perinatal Infection Risk in Women with and without Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and their Infants.

BACKGROUND: Increased risk of adverse birth outcomes is well described in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but risk of maternal or infant infection in the peripartum period has not been well studied. We conducted a population-based cohort study of infection risk in women with and without SLE and their infants. METHODS: Linked birth-hospital discharge data identified 1297 deliveries to women with SLE and a 4:1 comparison cohort of deliveries to women without SLE in Washington State, 1987-2013. Maternal and infant infections during the first 30 days after delivery were identified. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. RESULTS: Women with SLE were 1.7 times more likely (95% CI 1.4, 2.0) to have an infection during the birth hospitalisation and more likely to receive antibiotics during labour (RR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1, 1.5), though there was no increased risk of chorioamnionitis in women with SLE. Infants of women with SLE had an increased risk for an infection during the birth hospitalisation (RR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3, 3.5), although the size of the difference was smaller when adjusted for gestational age (RR 1.4, 95% CI 0.9, 2.1). Risks of neonatal infection, sepsis, receipt of antibiotics, and admission to neonatal intensive care were also increased, and were also attenuated after adjustment for gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: Women with SLE have an increased risk of peripartum infections and antibiotic exposure. Their neonates have a greater likelihood of infection, much of which is attributable to preterm birth.

Outcomes for 2 Children after Peripartum Acquisition of Zika Virus Infection, French Polynesia, 2013-2014.

Congenital Zika virus infection is associated with severe brain anomalies and impaired function. To determine outcomes, we followed 2 affected children for ≈30 months. For 1 who was symptomatic at birth, transient hepatitis developed. However, neurodevelopment for both children was age appropriate.

Association between intracervical Foley balloon and clinical chorioamnionitis among patients with group B streptococcus colonization undergoing induction with standardized labor management.

BACKGROUND: Intracervical Foley balloons are commonly used for cervical ripening, but there has been a historical concern regarding an increased risk of clinical chorioamnionitis with Foley balloon use in patients with group B streptococcus. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether intracervical Foley balloon use in patients with group B streptococcus is associated with an increased risk of clinical chorioamnionitis. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial Mechanical and Pharmacologic Methods of Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial that compared cervical ripening agents within a standardized labor protocol. Foley balloon (alone, with oxytocin, or with misoprostol) was compared with misoprostol only to evaluate the primary outcome of clinical chorioamnionitis, defined based on the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines. Patients with a term, singleton pregnancy with intact membranes and an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score of ≤6 and dilation ≤2 cm) and a known group B streptococcus status were included. The secondary outcomes included a composite postpartum maternal infectious outcome consisting of any occurrence of endometritis, wound infection, postpartum urinary tract infection, or maternal sepsis; additional secondary outcomes included neonatal outcomes. Binomial regression with robust error variance was used to evaluate whether group B streptococcus status modified the relationship between Foley balloon use and clinical chorioamnionitis and to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 491 patients were enrolled in the original trial. Of these patients, 467 had a known group B streptococcus status and underwent cervical ripening: 182 (39.0%) had group B streptococcus, and 285 (61.0%) did not have group B streptococcus. Moreover, 73.0% of patients received a Foley balloon, and 27.0% of patients did not receive a Foley balloon. There was no difference in the demographic or clinical characteristics between groups. The overall rate of clinical chorioamnionitis was 12.2%, with no difference between those with and without a Foley balloon (12.6% vs 11.1%, respectively; P=.66). Group B streptococcus status did not modify the association between Foley balloon use and clinical chorioamnionitis (relative risk, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-1.72). This remained unchanged after adjusting for gestational age (adjusted relative risk, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-1.67). Furthermore, other maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: In this secondary analysis of a large randomized trial using a standardized labor protocol, there was no increased risk of infectious morbidity with Foley balloon use in patients overall and in patients with group B streptococcus. Our findings support that a Foley balloon can be safely used for cervical ripening in patients with group B streptococcus colonization.

Peripartum infectious morbidity in women with preeclampsia.

BACKGROUND: Dysregulated maternal systemic inflammatory response is a commonly accepted component in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Chronic inflammation then occurs characterized by oxidative stress, proinflammatory cytokine production, and abnormal T-cell function. Infection results in similar physiologic changes. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the association between the diagnosis of preeclampsia and the development of chorioamnionitis, postpartum fever, endometritis and wound infection. We hypothesize that the heightened chronic inflammatory state of preeclampsia increases the risk for maternal peripartum infection. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study from the Consortium on Safe Labor (CSL). In the present analysis, we included all women from the CSL database and compared their characteristics and pregnancy outcomes between those with and without a diagnosis of preeclampsia prior to labor. Women presenting with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes or were diagnosed with preeclampsia during labor or postpartum were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal peripartum infections including intrapartum chorioamnionitis, postpartum fever, endometritis, and wound infection. This outcome was compared between women with and without a diagnosis of preeclampsia prior to labor using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: A total of 227,052 women were eligible for the analysis, of these 14,268 (6.3%) were diagnosed with preeclampsia. In univariable analysis, the rate of composite maternal peripartum infection was higher among women with preeclampsia (4.2 versus 3.8%, p = .026). When looking at each individual component, that rates of wound infection (1.0 versus 0.5%, p < .001) and postpartum fever (8.2 versus 4.4%, p < .001) were higher among women with diagnosis of preeclampsia, whereas the rate of intrapartum chorioamnionitis was lower among women with preeclampsia (1.3 versus 1.7% p = .004). Endometritis rates did not differ between the two groups. In multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for confounding variables, including maternal race, insurance status, prepregnancy BMI, maternal age, number of fetuses, number of vaginal exams, intrauterine pressure catheter and fetal scalp electrode placement, mode of delivery, group B streptococcus positivity, maternal education level, induction of labor, prelabor rupture of membranes, tobacco use, presence of diabetes (pregestational and gestational), gestational age at delivery, and chronic hypertension, the association between preeclampsia and composite maternal peripartum infection did not persist. In fact, after controlling for these influences, women with preeclampsia showed lower rates of intrapartum chorioamnionitis (aOR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.99). The rest of the individual component of the primary composite outcome, postpartum fever, endometritis, and wound infection, were not associated with the diagnosis of preeclampsia. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of women diagnosed with preeclampsia prior to labor, the rate of intrapartum chorioamnionitis was decreased and the rate of postpartum infectious morbidity was not higher compared to women without a diagnosis of preeclampsia.

Congenital cutaneous candidiasis associated with maternal peripartum candidemia.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous congenital candidiasis (CCC) is a rare condition consisting of invasive fungal infection of the epidermis and dermis that mostly affects preterm infants. Maternal vaginal candidiasis is present in half of the cases, although the occurrence of invasive candidiasis during pregnancy or peripartum period is exceptional. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a full-term infant that was born by vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery to an apparently healthy 33 year-old woman with no history of intravenous drug use or vaginal candidiasis during pregnancy. The newborn showed a diffuse maculopapular rash with respiratory distress and bilateral interstitial lung infiltrates, requiring nasal continuous positive airway pressure support. Blood cultures obtained from the mother due to intrapartum fever yielded Candida albicans. Cultures of vaginal discharge and neonate skin also yielded C. albicans with the same in vitro susceptibly pattern. No alternative source for candidemia was identified. The clinical course after starting a systemic antifungal therapy was favorable in both the mother and the neonate, with clearance of candidemia and resolution of the skin lesions. CONCLUSIONS: CCC must be considered in full-term newborns with maculopapular rash at birth or during the first days of life. The absence of alternative sources for bloodstream infection in the present case suggests a potential etiopathogenic relationship between CCC and maternal candidemia. It is reasonable to rule out postpartum candidemia when CCC is suspected.