Sedentary behaviour may cause differences in physical outcomes and activities of daily living in older cardiovascular disease patients participating in phase I cardiac rehabilitation.

This study aimed to investigate the rate of sedentary behaviour and differences in physical outcomes and activities of daily living (ADL) based on sedentary behaviour time of hospitalized older cardiovascular disease patients undergoing phase I cardiac rehabilitation. Older cardiovascular disease patients were enrolled from October 2020 to September 2023 and were divided into the high sedentary behaviour group (≥ 480 min/day) and low sedentary behaviour group (< 480 min/day). Patients' clinical characteristics, usual gait speed, and Five Times Sit to Stand Test time were compared as indices of physical outcomes. Motor, cognitive, and total Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores were used as indices of ADL and compared between groups using analysis of covariance. Final analysis included 402 patients (mean age: 76.7 years, female: 35.3%). The high sedentary behaviour group included 48.5% of the study patients. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, gait speed (0.80 ± 0.27 vs. 0.96 ± 0.23 m/s, p < 0.001) was lower and FTSST time (11.31 ± 4.19 vs. 9.39 ± 3.11 s, p < 0.001) was higher in the high sedentary behaviour group versus low sedentary behaviour group. Motor (85.82 ± 8.82 vs. 88.09 ± 5.04 points, p < 0.001), cognitive (33.32 ± 2.93 vs. 34.04 ± 2.24 points, p < 0.001), and total FIM scores (119.13 ± 10.66 vs. 122.02 ± 6.30 points, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the high sedentary behaviour group versus low sedentary behaviour group after adjustment. In older cardiovascular disease patients in phase I cardiac rehabilitation, sedentary behaviour time might influence physical outcomes and ADL at discharge. It is thus important to consider the amount of sedentary behaviour time spent by these patients during daily life while hospitalized.

Effects of visual arts-based interventions on physical and psychosocial outcomes of people with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Stroke is the leading cause of disability worldwide. People with stroke face a variety of physical and psychosocial issues as a result of their disability. Visual arts-based interventions refer to providing participants with structured visual arts-based activities and non-judgemental and safe environments to improve their health-related outcomes. Recent evidence showed that visual arts-based interventions had the potential to promote the holistic well-being of people with stroke. However, evidence of the effects of visual arts-based interventions on physical and psychosocial outcomes of people with stroke is limited. Objective: (1) To investigate the effects of visual arts-based interventions on physical and psychological outcomes in people with stroke, and (2) to identify the effective regimen of visual arts-based interventions to improve physical and psychosocial outcomes in people with stroke. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting: Not applicable. Participants: 483 people with stroke were included in this review. Methods: Fourteen English and five Chinese databases were searched from the date of their inception to February 2022 using keywords based on the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Study framework. Two reviewers independently assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias and extracted data. Methodological quality was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4. Narrative synthesis was performed when meta-analysis was inappropriate to conduct. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Results: Seven randomised controlled trials were included. A meta-analysis reported statistically significant effects of visual arts-based interventions on depressive symptoms (Standardized mean difference [SMD]: -1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.67 to -0.61; three studies; moderate quality of evidence), activities of daily living (SMD: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.24 to 1.69; four studies; low quality of evidence), and upper limb function (SMD: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.42 to 1.24; two studies; low quality of evidence). Conclusions: Visual arts-based interventions have favourable effects on depressive symptoms, activities of daily living, and upper limb function of people with stroke. However, the quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Limited evidence suggested the effective regimen of visual arts-based interventions. Further rigorous randomised controlled trials should be developed to strengthen the relevant evidence. Registration: Registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on 11 July 2022 (Number: CRD42022334646).