Cardiovascular safety of pimitespib in patients with advanced solid tumors: An open-label, nonrandomized, phase 1 study.

BACKGROUND: Pimitespib (TAS-116), a first-in-class, oral, selective heat-shock protein 90 inhibitor, is approved as fourth-line treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in Japan. This phase 1 study evaluated the cardiac safety of pimitespib. METHODS: In this open-label, nonrandomized, multicenter study, Japanese patients (aged ≥20 years) with refractory, advanced solid tumors received placebo on day -1, then pimitespib 160 mg daily on days 1-5 of the cardiac safety evaluation period. Electrocardiograms were conducted at baseline, and on days -2, -1, 1, and 5; and blood samples were collected on days 1 and 5. Patients then received once-daily pimitespib for 5 days every 3 weeks. The primary end point was the time-matched difference in QT interval corrected for heart rate using the Fridericia correction (QTcF) between pimitespib and placebo. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and preliminary efficacy were also assessed. RESULTS: Of the 22 patients in the cardiac safety-evaluable population, no clinically relevant QTc prolongation was observed; the upper bound of the one-sided 95% confidence interval for the time-matched difference in change from baseline in QTcF was <20 msec at all time points on days 1 and 5. Pimitespib pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent with previous data, and the time-matched difference in change from baseline in QTcF showed no marked increase as plasma concentrations increased. The safety profile was acceptable; 40% of patients experienced grade 3 or greater adverse drug reactions, mostly diarrhea (20%). The median progression-free survival was 3.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese patients with refractory, advanced solid tumors, pimitespib was not associated with clinically relevant QTc prolongation, and there were no cardiovascular safety concerns. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Pimitespib is a new anticancer drug that is being used to treat cancer in the stomach or intestines (gastrointestinal stromal tumors). This study demonstrated that pimitespib had no marked effect on heart rhythm or negative effects on the heart or blood vessels and had promising anticancer effects in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors who were unable to tolerate or benefit from standard treatment.

Pimitespib for the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors and other tumors.

Pimitespib (TAS-116) is the first heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitor approved in Japan, and it is indicated for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) that have progressed after treatment with imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib. This review describes the preclinical and clinical research with pimitespib, including its mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, clinical antitumour activity and safety. In a phase III study, pimitespib significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with placebo (median 2.8 vs 1.4 months; hazard ratio 0.51; 95% CI 0.30-0.87; p = 0.006). Common treatment-related adverse events were diarrhoea, decreased appetite, increase in serum creatinine, malaise, nausea and eye disorders. The efficacy and safety of pimitespib are being investigated in other tumour types and in combination with other anticancer therapies.

What is this article about? This article provides information about pimitespib, a drug that recently became available in Japan for the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors, or 'GISTs'. GISTs are a type of cancer found in the gastrointestinal tract, and those that are considered 'advanced' have stopped responding to other treatments and have spread to other parts of the body. What have studies shown? Pimitespib works in a way unlike other drug treatments for cancer ­ it inhibits a protein called heat shock protein 90, and this stops cancer cells from developing and growing. Pimitespib is taken by mouth. Studies in Japanese patients with advanced GISTs showed an increase in the time taken for the cancer to progress further and in the length of time that patients survived among those treated with pimitespib, compared with patients who did not receive the drug. These studies also found that pimitespib was not associated with serious side effects, although diarrhoea occurred frequently. Eye disorders developed in some patients, but they could be managed by interrupting or stopping treatment with pimitespib. Pimitespib is also being studied for the treatment of other cancers, alone and in combination with other anticancer drugs. What conclusions can be made from these studies? There are very few treatments available for patients with advanced GISTs and, therefore, pimitespib is an important new option for such patients in Japan. If the results of ongoing studies are positive, pimitespib may become a treatment option for a wider range of cancer patients in the future.

Combination of pimitespib (TAS-116) with sunitinib is an effective therapy for imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Despite the effectiveness of imatinib, most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) develop resistance to the treatment, mainly due to the reactivation of KIT tyrosine kinase activity. Sunitinib, which inhibits the phosphorylation of KIT and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor, has been established as second-line therapy for GISTs. The recently-developed heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitor pimitespib (PIM; TAS-116) demonstrated clinical benefits in some clinical trials; however, the effects were limited. The aim of our study was therefore to clarify the effectiveness and mechanism of the combination of PIM with sunitinib for imatinib-resistant GISTs. We evaluated the efficacy and mechanism of the combination of PIM with sunitinib against imatinib-resistant GIST using imatinib-resistant GIST cell lines and murine xenograft models. In vitro analysis demonstrated that PIM and sunitinib combination therapy strongly inhibited growth and induced apoptosis in imatinib-resistant GIST cell lines by inhibiting KIT signaling and decreasing auto-phosphorylated KIT in the Golgi apparatus. In addition, PIM and sunitinib combination therapy enhanced antitumor responses in the murine xenograft models compared to individual therapies. Further analysis of the xenograft models showed that the combination therapy not only downregulated the KIT signaling pathway but also decreased the tumor microvessel density. Furthermore, we found that PIM suppressed VEGF expression in GIST cells by suppressing protein kinase D2 and hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha, which are both HSP90 client proteins. In conclusion, the combination of PIM and sunitinib is effective against imatinib-resistant GIST via the downregulation of KIT signaling and angiogenic signaling pathways.

Characterization of cell line with dedifferentiated GIST-like features established from cecal GIST of familial GIST model mice.

Approximately 40 families with multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and germline c-kit gene mutations have been reported. Three knock-in mouse models have been generated, and all the models showed a cecal GIST. In the present study, we established a cell line derived from cecal GIST in a familial GIST model mouse with KIT-Asp818Tyr. Since the established cells showed spindle-shaped morphology with atypical nuclei, and since immunohistochemistry revealed that they were positive for α-SMA but negative for KIT, CD34 and desmin, the phenotypes of the cells were reminiscent of dedifferentiated GIST-like ones but not the usual GIST-like ones. Gene expression analysis showed that the cell line, designated as DeGISTL1 cell, did not express c-kit gene apparently, but highly expressed HSP90 families and glutaminase 1. Pathway analysis of the cells revealed that metabolic pathway might promote their survival and growth. Pimitespib, a heat shock protein 90α/ß inhibitor, and Telaglenastat, a selective glutaminase 1 inhibitor, inhibited proliferation of DeGISTL1 cells and the combination of these showed an additive effect. DeGISTL1 cells might be a good model of dedifferentiated GISTs, and combination of Pimitespib and Telaglenastat could be a possible candidate for treatment strategy for them.

Pimitespib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (CHAPTER-GIST-301): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: Prognosis of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) refractory to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is poor. This randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of pimitespib, a novel heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, in advanced GIST refractory to standard TKIs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed GIST refractory to imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib were randomized 2 : 1 to oral pimitespib 160 mg/day or placebo for 5 consecutive days per week in 21-day cycles. Following disease progression by blinded central radiological review (BCRR), cross-over to open-label pimitespib was permitted. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by BCRR in the full analysis set. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) adjusted using the rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) method to reduce the expected confounding impact of cross-over. RESULTS: From 31 October 2018 to 30 April 2020, 86 patients were randomized to pimitespib (n = 58) or placebo (n = 28). Median PFS was 2.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6-2.9 months] with pimitespib versus 1.4 months (0.9-1.8 months) with placebo [hazard ratio (HR) 0.51 (95% CI 0.30-0.87); one-sided P = 0.006]. Pimitespib showed an improvement in cross-over-adjusted OS compared with placebo [HR 0.42 (0.21-0.85), one-sided P = 0.007]. Seventeen (60.7%) patients receiving placebo crossed-over to pimitespib; median PFS after cross-over was 2.7 months (95% CI 0.7-4.1 months). The most common (≥30%) treatment-related adverse events (AEs) with pimitespib were diarrhea (74.1%) and decreased appetite (31.0%); the most common (≥10%) grade ≥3 treatment-related AE was diarrhea (13.8%). Treatment-related AEs leading to pimitespib discontinuation occurred in three (5.2%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pimitespib significantly improved PFS and cross-over-adjusted OS compared with placebo and had an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced GIST refractory to standard TKIs.

An open-label, crossover study to compare different formulations and evaluate effect of food on pharmacokinetics of pimitespib in patients with advanced solid tumors.

This study compared the bioavailability of two pimitespib formulations (Formulations A and B), evaluated the food effect on Formulation A, and evaluated the safety and efficacy of multiple pimitespib doses in patients with solid tumors. This clinical, pharmacological multicenter study had two cohorts and periods. A single dose of Formulation A or B was administered in a crossover design to compare the pharmacokinetics in Cohort 1. In Cohort 2, the effects of fed vs fasting conditions were evaluated among those receiving Formulation A. Subsequently, multiple Formulation A doses were administered to all patients for safety and efficacy assessments. In Cohorts 1 and 2, 12 and 16 patients, respectively, were analyzed for pharmacokinetics. Thirty patients were analyzed for safety and efficacy. Maximum concentration (Cmax), area under the curve (AUC)last, and AUCinf geometric mean ratios for Formulations A and B (90% confidence interval [CI]) were 0.8078 (0.6569-0.9933), 0.7973 (0.6672-0.9529), and 0.8094 (0.6697-0.9782), respectively; 90% CIs were not within the bioequivalence range (0.80-1.25). In Cohort 2, mean Cmax, AUClast, and AUCinf were higher in fed vs fasting conditions. No safety concerns emerged with single or multiple administration. Overall response rate, disease control rate, and median progression-free survival were 0%, 33%, and 1.5 months, respectively. Four patients had stable disease ≥ 5 months. Bioequivalence of the two formulations was unconfirmed. Systemic exposure of Formulation A was approximately 20% less than Formulation B. A high-fat/calorie meal increased the relative pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of a single 160-mg dose. Trial Registration: JapicCTI-184191 (Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center) registered on November 5, 2018.

Pimitespib is effective on cecal GIST in a mouse model of familial GISTs with KIT-Asp820Tyr mutation through KIT signaling inhibition.

Three families with multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) caused by a germline Asp820Tyr mutation at exon 17 of the c-kit gene (KIT-Asp820Tyr) have been reported. We previously generated a knock-in mouse model of the family, and the mice with KIT-Asp818Tyr corresponding to human KIT-Asp820Tyr showed a cecal tumor equivalent to human GIST. In the model mice, we reported that tyrosine kinase inhibitor, imatinib, could stabilize but not decrease the cecal tumor volume. In this report, we examined whether a heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, pimitespib (TAS-116), has an inhibitory effect on phosphorylation of KIT-Asp818Tyr and can decrease the cecal tumor volume in the model mice. First, we showed that pimitespib inhibited KIT phosphorylation both dose- and time-dependently in KIT-Asp818Tyr transfected murine Ba/F3 cells. Then, four 1-week courses of pimitespib were orally administered to heterozygous (KIT-Asp818Tyr/+) model mice. Each course consisted of once-daily administration for consecutive 5 days followed by 2 days-off. Cecal tumors were dissected, and tumor volume was histologically analyzed, Ki-67 labeling index was immunohistochemically examined, and apoptotic figures were counted. Compared to the vehicle treated mice, pimitespib administered mice showed statistically significantly smaller cecal tumor volume, lower Ki-67 labeling index, and higher number of apoptotic figures in 10 high power fields (P = 0.0344, P = 0.0019 and P = 0.0269, respectively). Western blotting revealed that activation of KIT signaling molecules was strongly inhibited in the tumor tissues of pimitespib-administered mice compared to control mice. Thus, pimitespib seemed to inhibit in vivo tumor progression effectively in the model mice. These results suggest that the progression of multiple GISTs in patients with germline KIT-Asp820Tyr might be controllable by pimitespib.

Recent developments of HSP90 inhibitors: an updated patent review (2020-present).

INTRODUCTION: The 90-kDa heat shock protein (HSP90) functions as a molecular chaperone, it assumes a significant role in diseases such as cancer, inflammation, neurodegeneration, and infection. Therefore, the research and development of HSP90 inhibitors have garnered considerable attention. AREAS COVERED: The primary references source for this review is patents obtained from SciFinder, encompassing patents on HSP90 inhibitors from the period of 2020 to 2023.This review includes a thorough analysis of their structural attributes, pharmacological properties, and potential clinical utilities. EXPERT OPINION: In the past few years, HSP90 inhibitors targeting ATP binding pocket are still predominate and one of them has been launched, besides, novel drug design strategies like C-terminal targeting, isoform selective inhibiting and bifunctional molecules are booming, aiming to improve the efficacy and safety. With expanded drug types and applications, HSP90 inhibitors may gradually becoming a sagacious option for treating various diseases.

Pimitespib, a Novel Heat Shock Protein 90 Inhibitor, Is Effective in Treating Renal Cell Carcinoma by Anti-angiogenetic Signaling.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Most clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCCs) have a dysfunctional von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein (VHL). Hypoxia-inducible factors 1 and 2 alpha (HIF1α and HIF2α) accumulate in ccRCC with dysfunctional VHL and up-regulate the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway and tumor angiogenesis. Recently, pimitespib (PIM), a potent ATP-competitive inhibitor of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), was developed. PIM down-regulates the expression of HIF, a key protein in ccRCC progression, with anti-angiogenic effects. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of PIM in ccRCC and the underlying mechanisms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The efficacy and mechanism of PIM against ccRCCs was evaluated using ccRCC cell lines. RESULTS: PIM inhibited the VEGFR pathway by down-regulating VEGFR 2, phosphorylated VEGFR 2, and protein levels in downstream signaling pathways. The growth of ccRCC cell lines was inhibited by PIM. Furthermore, PIM inhibits HIF1α, HIF2α, and VEGF expression, suggesting that PIM may suppress angiogenesis in addition to the VEGFR pathway. CONCLUSION: PIM provides a novel approach for treating ccRCC and holds promise for future clinical strategies. Further in vivo and clinical research is required to elucidate the detailed relationship between the effects of PIM and ccRCC.

Syringaresinol inhibits cardiorenal fibrosis through HSP90 in a cardiorenal syndrome type 2.

BACKGROUND: Syringaresinol processes anti-inflammatory and antioxidative activity. However, the effects of syringaresinol on cardiorenal fibrosis caused by cardiorenal syndrome type 2 (CRS2) are unclear. METHODS: Molecular docking predicted binding activity of syringaresinol to heat shock protein 90 (HSP90). The toxicity of a 4-weeks treatment with 20 mg/kg of syringaresinol was observed by measuring serum pro-inflammatory cytokines levels and by cardiorenal pathology. A CRS2 rad model was established by myocardial infarction using ligation over an 8 week-period. Rats were divided into five groups, including sham, CRS2, pimitespib, syringaresinol, and HSP90 + syringaresinol. Rats were received a 4-weeks daily treatment with 10 mg/kg pimitespib (a HSP90 inhibitor) or 20 mg/kg syringaresinol. Recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) carrying a periostin (PE) promoter driving the expression of wild-type HSP90 (rAAV9-PE-HSP90, 1 × 1011 µg) was treated intravenously once in CRS2 model rats. Cardiorenal function and pathology were assessed. Expressions of HSP90 and TGF-ß1 in the myocardium and kidney were measured by immunohistochemistry and western blotting. RESULTS: Syringaresinol showed good binding activity with HSP90, and no signs of toxicity in rats following treatment. Pimitespib or syringaresinol significantly improved the cardiorenal function and fibrosis in rats with CRS2. Meanwhile, the rAAV9-PE-HSP90 injection obviously blocked the effects of syringaresinol. CONCLUSIONS: Syringaresinol targets HSP90 to suppress CRS2-induced cardiorenal fibrosis, providing a promising therapeutic drug for CRS2.

Long-term response to pimitespib in postoperative recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors with PDGFRA D842V mutation: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Exon 18 D842V, which is a point mutation from aspartic acid to valine at codon 842, is the most frequent mutation in Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor alpha (PDGFRA)-mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). In the Japanese GIST guidelines, no standard systematic therapy is available for this type of GIST, which is refractory after recurrence. Recently, pimitespib (PIMI), a novel heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitor, was approved for the treatment of advanced GIST in a phase III study. This report presents a case of a long-term response to PIMI in GIST with PDGFRA D842V mutation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 55-year-old woman was diagnosed with primary GIST of the stomach and underwent partial gastrectomy. Eight years after the operation, recurrent GISTs were identified as multiple recurrent peritoneal GISTs in the upper right abdomen and pelvic cavity. We administered tyrosine kinase inhibitors, but they achieved poor effects. After failure of the standard treatment, PIMI was administered and achieved a partial response in the patient. The highest reduction rate was 32.7%. After PIMI failed, we performed multiplex gene panel testing, which revealed the PDGFRA D842V mutation. CONCLUSIONS: We report the first case of long-term response to PIMI in PDGFRA D842V mutant GIST. Pimitespib may be effective for treating GIST harboring this mutation by inhibiting HSP90.

Pimitespib, an HSP90 inhibitor, augments nifuroxazide-induced disruption in the IL-6/STAT3/HIF-1α autocrine loop in rats with bleomycin-challenged lungs: Evolutionary perspective in managing pulmonary fibrosis.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a fatal lung disorder in which the etiology and pathogenesis are still unobvious. Effective treatments are urgently needed considering that lung transplantation is the only treatment that could improve outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic significance of the dual administration of pimitespib, an HSP90 inhibitor, and nifuroxazide, a STAT3 inhibitor, against bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in rats. Our results revealed that pimitespib/nifuroxazide inhibited bleomycin-induced alterations in the structure and the function of the lungs. They demonstrated significant decreases in the BALF total and differential cell counts, LDH activity, and total protein. Concurrently, there was a reduction in the accumulation of collagen as proved by decreased hydroxyproline and the gene expression of COL1A1 accompanied by lower levels of PDGF-BB, TIMP-1, and TGF-ß. The levels of IL-6 were also downregulated. Pimitespib-induced inhibition of HSP90 led to subsequent inhibition of HIF-1α and STAT3 client proteins since the closed HSP90 would not enclose its client proteins. Therefore, pimitespib resulted in the repression of HIF-1α/CREB-p300 HAT as well as the STAT3/CREB-p300 HAT nuclear interactions. On the other hand, nifuroxazide resulted in a notable decline in pSTAT3 and HIF-1α levels. Subsequently, the combined effects of both drugs led to a substantial reduction in ECM deposition. Herein, pimitespib augmented nifuroxazide-induced disruption in the IL-6/STAT3/HIF-1α autocrine loop. Our findings also disclose that this novel loop is a promising therapeutic attack site for possible pulmonary fibrosis repression studies. Therefore, the use of pimitespib/nifuroxazide embodies an evolutionary perspective in managing pulmonary fibrosis.