Paediatric perspectives in the diagnosis of polyuria-polydipsia syndrome.

The elucidation of the underlying cause of polyuria-polydipsia syndrome (PPS) is a challenging-especially in the differentiation of partial defects of arginine vasopressin (AVP) secretion or action from primary polydipsia. The water deprivation test has been utilized for many decades, and its application in the paediatric population has been applied using parameters predominantly established in adult cohorts. In more recent times, the development of automated commercial assays for copeptin, a surrogate marker for AVP, has represented a significant advancement in the diagnostic approach to PPS. Measurement of copeptin concentrations has major advantages and has essentially superseded measurement of AVP in diagnostic protocols for PPS. Additionally, stimulated-copeptin protocols utilizing hypertonic saline infusion, arginine, and glucagon have been investigated, and are promising. However, further studies are required in the population-incorporating the differences in physiological regulation of water homeostasis, and safety requirements-before there is widespread adoption into clinical practice.

The diagnostic performance of copeptin in clinical practice: A prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Plasma copeptin is a relatively new biomarker for evaluation of arginine vasopressin (AVP) secretion. The aim of this study was to test the diagnostic performance of copeptin in patients with polyuria-polydipsia syndrome. DESIGN, PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: This was a prospective study where 88 patients with polyuria-polydipsia syndrome were evaluated with a water deprivation test (WDT). Weight, urine osmolality, urine specific gravity, and plasma copeptin were collected at baseline, after 8 h, and at termination of the WDT when one of the following had been reached: (i) >3% weight reduction, (ii) urine specific gravity >1.017 or urine osmolality >600 mOsm/kg, or (iii) intolerable adverse symptoms. RESULTS: Of 88 patients (57 women), 21 (24%) were diagnosed with central diabetes insipidus (cDI), 5 (6%) with nephrogenic DI (nDI), and 62 (71%) with primary polydipsia (PP). Median (interquartile range) copeptin at baseline was 1.7 (1.4-2.5) pmol/L in cDI, 22 (18-65) pmol/L in nDI, and 2.7 (2-4) pmol/L in PP. After 8 h of WDT, the highest copeptin in patients with cDI was 4.0 pmol/L. In patients with PP: (i) 41 had urine osmolality <600 mOsm/kg, 7 (17%) of these had copeptin >4.0 pmol/L, (ii) 21 had urine osmolality ≥600 mOsm/kg, 14 (67%) of these had copeptin >4.0 pmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: Copeptin >4.0 pmol/L after an overnight WDT can be used to rule out cDI and copeptin ≥21 pmol/L at baseline to diagnose nDI. The diagnostic performance of copeptin in the context of the WDT is otherwise limited in the diagnostic work-up of patients with polyuria-polydipsia syndrome.

Copeptin as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in pediatric diseases.

Arginine vasopressin (AVP) plays a main role in maintaining the homeostasis of fluid balance and vascular tone and in regulating the endocrine stress response in response to osmotic, hemodynamic and stress stimuli. However, the difficulty in measuring AVP limits its clinical application. Copeptin, the C-terminal part of the AVP precursor, is released in an equimolar concentration mode with AVP from the pituitary but is more stable and simple to measure. Therefore, copeptin has emerged as a promising surrogate marker of AVP with excellent potential for the diagnosis, differentiation and prognosis of various diseases in recent decades. However, its application requires further validation, especially in the pediatric population. This review focuses on the clinical value of copeptin in different pediatric diseases and the prospects for its application as a potential biomarker.

An exceptional cause of polyuria-polydipsia syndrome in a 10-year-old boy.

Polyuria-polydipsia syndrome is a frequent symptom in pediatrics, primarily attributed to diabetes mellitus. In the context of diabetes insipidus, this syndrome can stem from central or nephrogenic factors. Sjögren's syndrome, an uncommon autoimmune disease in children, can affect multiple organs. Kidney involvement as described in adults is usually related to glomerular or tubular impairment, often linked to distal tubular acidosis. As a kidney involvement during childhood, Sjögren's syndrome has rarely been reported. Hereby, we present the case of Sjögren's syndrome revealed by polyuria-polydipsia syndrome in a 10-year-old boy.

Oral Levodopa Stimulates Copeptin Secretion in Children and Adolescents with Intact Posterior Pituitary Function.

BACKGROUND: Copeptin stimulation tests can be used in the differential diagnosis of polyuria polydipsia syndrome. Current stimulation methods rely on intravenous or subcutaneous administration. Oral stimulus can further simplify the diagnostic approach. The levodopa stimulation test is widely used in the evaluation of growth hormone deficiency (GHD), and the dopamine pathway was reported to be associated with arginine vasopressin secretion. The study aimed to investigate the effect of oral levodopa on copeptin secretion. METHODS: The study was a prospective observational single-center cohort study. Patients < 18 years old with short stature and no symptoms of polyuria or polydipsia undergoing levodopa stimulation test for suspected GHD were recruited from May 2023 to Nov 2023. Copeptin and growth hormone (GH) were measured at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120min in the levodopa test. The insulin tolerance test with copeptin and GH measured at the same time points was conducted in part of patients. RESULTS: Forty-four participants were included in the final analysis. In the levodopa stimulation test, the median (interquartile range, IQR) copeptin concentration increased from 5.20 (3.51, 8.25) pmol/L to maximum 19.36 (8.97, 108.08) pmol/L (P < 0.001), 3.94 (1.41, 13.88) times of the baseline (P < 0.001). Compared with insulin tolerance test, peak copeptin in the levodopa test was significantly higher (34.61 (13.67, 98.96) vs 8.88 (7.14, 15.42) pmol/L, P = 0.009). Higher copeptin was associated with larger dose of levodopa. CONCLUSIONS: Oral levodopa could be used to stimulate copeptin.

New insights on diagnosis and treatment of AVP deficiency.

Arginine vasopressin deficiency (AVP-D) is one of the main entities of the polyuria-polydipsia syndrome. Its correct diagnosis and differentiation from the other two causes - AVP resistance and primary polydipsia - is crucial as this determines the further management of these patients.Over the last years, several new diagnostic tests using copeptin, the stable surrogate marker of AVP, have been introduced. Among them, hypertonic saline stimulated copeptin was confirmed to reliably and safely improve the diagnostic accuracy to diagnose AVP-D. Due to its simplicity, arginine stimulated copeptin was put forward as alternative test procedure. Glucagon-stimulated copeptin also showed promising results, while the oral growth hormone secretagogue Macimorelin failed to provide a sufficient stimulus. Interestingly, an approach using machine learning techniques also showed promising results concerning diagnostic accuracy.Once AVP-D is diagnosed, further workup is needed to evaluate its etiology. This will partly define the further treatment and management. In general, treatment of AVP-D focuses on desmopressin substitution, with oral formulations currently showing the best tolerance and safety profile. However, in addition to desmopressin substitution, recent data also showed that psychopathological factors play an important role in managing AVP-D patients.

Copeptin is increased by nausea and vomiting during hypertonic saline infusion in healthy individuals.

OBJECTIVE: Measurement of hypertonic saline-stimulated copeptin has recently been described for the differentiation of polyuria-polydipsia syndrome. This study aims to determine the copeptin response to intravenous 3% hypertonic saline, including evaluation of adverse effects, in a local cohort of healthy adults >18 years in Australia. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers (10 males and 10 females) were recruited. Participants underwent infusion of 3% hypertonic saline via a previously described standardized protocol, until the plasma sodium was ≥150 mmol/L, with measurement of plasma copeptin. RESULTS: Mean peak sodium was 152 mmol/L ± SD 1.4 with osmolality 315 mmol/kg ± SD 3.9. Median volume of hypertonic saline infused to reach target sodium ≥ 150 mmol/L was 1536 mL (IQR 1362, 1992). Mean rate of plasma sodium rise was 5.9 mmol/L/hour ± SD 1.5. Hypertonic saline-stimulated copeptin had non-parametrical distribution with median of 33.8 pmol/L (IQR 27.6, 63.6). Overall median symptom burden was 6/10 (range 3/10-9/10). Copeptin was significantly higher for those who experienced nausea and/or vomiting (n = 13) (median 39.0 pmol/L; IQR 32.5, 90), compared to those participants who did not experience either (median 20.0 pmol/L; IQR 13.0, 31.0) (P = 0.003). There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Hypertonic saline-stimulated copeptin measurements were similar in our population compared with previously reported reference intervals in healthy volunteers. There is a wide range of stimulated copeptin measurements in the healthy population. Nausea and vomiting are common adverse effects which enhance the copeptin response.

Polyuria-polydipsia syndrome: a diagnostic challenge.

The main determinants for the maintenance of water homeostasis are the hormone arginine vasopressin (AVP) and thirst. Disturbances in these regulatory mechanisms can lead to polyuria-polydipsia syndrome, which comprises of three different conditions: central diabetes insipidus (DI) due to insufficient secretion of AVP, nephrogenic DI caused by renal insensitivity to AVP action and primary polydipsia due to excessive fluid intake and consequent physiological suppression of AVP. It is crucial to determine the exact diagnosis because treatment strategies vary substantially. To differentiate between the causes of the polyuria-polydipsia syndrome, a water deprivation test combined with desmopressin administration is the diagnostic 'gold standard'. Thereby, AVP activity is indirectly evaluated through the measurement of urine osmolality after prolonged dehydration. However, this test has several limitations and may fail to distinguish precisely between patients with primary polydipsia and mild forms of central and nephrogenic DI. The direct measurement of AVP during the water deprivation test, which was reported in the 1980s, has not been widely adopted due to availability, assay issues and diagnostic performance. Recently, copeptin, the c-terminal portion of the larger precursor peptide of AVP, has been evaluated in the setting of polyuria-polydipsia syndrome and appears to be a useful candidate biomarker for the differential diagnosis. A standardised method for the water deprivation test is presented as part of a joint initiative of the Endocrine Society of Australia, the Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists and the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia to harmonise dynamic endocrine tests across Australia.

Copeptin Stimulation by Combined Intravenous Arginine and Oral LevoDopa/Carbidopa in Healthy Short Children and Children with the Polyuria-Polydipsia Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Stimulated copeptin may provide an alternative to water deprivation testing (WDT) in the evaluation of polyuria-polydipsia syndrome (PPS). Though best studied, arginine stimulation alone produces a modest copeptin response in children. We investigated the effectiveness of the arginine + LevoDopa/Carbidopa stimulation test (ALD-ST) for copeptin. METHODS: 47 healthy short children (controls), 10 children with primary polydipsia, and 10 children with AVP deficiency received arginine hydrochloride (500 mg/kg intravenously over 30 min) and Levodopa/carbidopa (10:1 ratio; 175 mg of l-Dopa/m2 BSA) orally. Serum copeptin was measured at 0, 60, 90, and 120 min. RESULTS: In controls, ALD-ST increased copeptin from a median of 7.0 pmol/L (IQR 5.0-10.0) to a peak of 44.0 pmol/L (IQR 21.4-181.0) between 60 and 120 min (p < 0.001). Copeptin peak was higher in subjects who experienced nausea or vomiting (57%) than in those who did not (131.0 pmol/L [IQR 42.5-193.8] vs. 22.7 pmol/L [IQR 16.0-33.7], p < 0.001). While subjects with primary polydipsia had similar baseline (8.5 pmol/L [IQR 8.0-11.0]) and stimulated (125.2 pmol/L [IQR 87.6-174.0]) copeptin levels as controls, subjects with AVP deficiency had lower baseline (2.5 pmol/L [IQR 2.0-3.1]) and peak levels (4.6 pmol/L [IQR 2.4-6.0]). A peak copeptin of ≥9.3 pmol/L best predicted absence of complete or partial AVP deficiency with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 80%. CONCLUSIONS: ALD-ST induced a robust peak copeptin in healthy short children and children with primary polydipsia. Nausea/vomiting, a side effect of ALD-ST, amplified the copeptin response. The ALD-ST may be a suitable initial screening test in children with PPS.

The diagnostic role of arginine-stimulated copeptin in the differential diagnosis of polyuria-polydipsia syndrome (PPS) in pediatric age.

PURPOSE: In recent years, copeptin stimulation through arginine administration has been evaluated as a new potential tool in the differential diagnosis of polyuria-polydipsia syndrome (PPS) in adults; to date very few data, all retrospective, exist in pediatric age. The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the arginine-stimulation test for copeptin in a cohort of pediatric patients affected by PPS. METHODS: All children (<18 years) referred to the Department of Pediatric Endocrinology of the Regina Margherita Children Hospital for polyuria-polydipsia in the period January 2021-June 2023 were enrolled. The Arginine-stimulation test for copeptin was performed in all patients presenting PPS after water deprivation test (WDT). Patients with polyuria-polydipsia were then classified as having primary polyuria (PP), complete and partial central diabetes insipidus (CDI), according to the standardized interpretation. Arginine-stimulation test for copeptin was also performed in a control cohort. RESULTS: A significant difference in arginine-stimulated copeptin values was observed at baseline (p = 0.005), at 60 min (p = 0.01), and at 90 min (p = 0.005) in 7 subjects presenting PP, 6 patients affected by CDI and 50 subjects of the control cohort. Plasma osmolality values remained stable at all measurements. The arginine-stimulated copeptin test demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 100%, whereas the sensitivity of the WDT test was 83.3% and the specificity was 85.7%. CONCLUSION: Given the reliability and the minor adverse effects and costs, the copeptin level after arginine administration could replace the WDT in the diagnostic workup of these in pediatric age.

Combined Arginine and Insulin Stimulation Elicits a Robust and Consistent Copeptin Response in Short Children.

INTRODUCTION: Copeptin, co-secreted with arginine vasopressin, is regulated by osmotic and volume stimuli but also responds to intravenous arginine and insulin-induced hypoglycemia. The serum copeptin response to the latter agents has been studied in adults but only to a limited extent in children. The objective of this study was to describe the copeptin response to combined arginine and insulin in children with normal posterior pituitary function. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-arm assessment of serum copeptin concentrations in children (age 7-16 years, n = 38) undergoing growth hormone stimulation testing with an arginine-insulin tolerance test (AITT) for short stature or growth deceleration in a tertiary referral center. After overnight fasting, arginine (500 mg/kg) was administered between 0 and 30 min intravenously (IV) followed by insulin (0.1 units/kg IV) at 60 min. Copeptin serum concentrations were measured at baseline (0 min), at the post-arginine peak (60 min), and at the post-insulin peak (90 min; 30 min post-insulin), respectively. The main outcome was the peak copeptin concentration. RESULTS: Mean ± SD copeptin concentrations increased from 9.9 ± 5.0 pmol/L at 0 min to 13.2 ± 5.8 pmol/L at 60 min (p < 0.0001 vs. 0 min) and 27.7 ± 14.2 pmol/L at 90 min (p < 0.0001 vs. 0 and 60 min). There was no significant correlation between copeptin concentrations and age, BMI, pubertal status, cortisol, growth hormone, or glucose concentrations. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Arginine and insulin appear to have an additive and consistent effect resulting in significant stimulation of copeptin secretion in children. The AITT may be a useful tool to evaluate for normal posterior pituitary function in this age-group, with potential implications for the evaluation of polyuria-polydipsia syndrome.

Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus: a comprehensive overview.

Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI) is characterized by the inability to concentrate urine that results in polyuria and polydipsia, despite having normal or elevated plasma concentrations of arginine vasopressin (AVP). In this study, we review the clinical aspects and diagnosis of NDI, the various etiologies, current treatment options and potential future developments. NDI has different clinical manifestations and approaches according to the etiology. Hereditary forms of NDI are mainly caused by mutations in the genes that encode key proteins in the AVP signaling pathway, while acquired causes are normally associated with specific drug exposure, especially lithium, and hydroelectrolytic disorders. Clinical manifestations of the disease vary according to the degree of dehydration and hyperosmolality, being worse when renal water losses cannot be properly compensated by fluid intake. Regarding the diagnosis of NDI, it is important to consider the symptoms of the patient and the diagnostic tests, including the water deprivation test and the baseline plasma copeptin measurement, a stable surrogate biomarker of AVP release. Without proper treatment, patients may developcomplications leading to high morbidity and mortality, such as severe dehydration and hypernatremia. In that sense, the treatment of NDI consists in decreasing the urine output, while allowing appropriate fluid balance, normonatremia, and ensuring an acceptable quality of life. Therefore, therapeutic options include nonpharmacological interventions, including sufficient water intake and a low-sodium diet, and pharmacological treatment. The main medications used for NDI are thiazide diuretics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and amiloride, used isolated or in combination.

The usefulness of copeptin for the diagnosis of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in infancy: a case report.

OBJECTIVES: We report a case of an infant with nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI) diagnosed by the measurement of serum copeptin. There is only one study that previously evaluated the use of copeptin measurement in a pediatric patient. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a 10-month-old child with polyuria-polydipsia syndrome (PPS) and hypernatremia that could not support water restriction due to increased risk of dehydration and worsening of his condition. Therefore, plasma measurement of copeptin allowed the diagnosis of NDI. CONCLUSIONS: The water deprivation test (WDT) is considered the gold standard for diagnosis in PPS. However, WDT has serious limitations regarding its interpretation. Furthermore, the WDT can cause dehydration and hypernatremia, especially in young children. Therefore, the measurement of plasma copeptin seems to be a promising method to perform an earlier, safer, and accurate investigation of PPS. Up to now, our study is the second to report the usefulness of copeptin in children.

Incidence of hyperkalemia during hypertonic saline test for the diagnosis of diabetes insipidus.

OBJECTIVE: Hyperkalemia has been reported upon different hypertonic saline infusion protocols. Since hypertonic saline test has recently been validated for the differential diagnosis of diabetes insipidus (DI), we aimed to investigate the course of plasma potassium during the test. DESIGN: We analyzed data of 90 healthy volunteers and 141 patients with polyuria-polydipsia syndrome (PPS) from two prospective studies evaluating the hypertonic saline test. Our primary outcome was the incidence rate of hypertonic saline-induced hyperkalemia > 5 mmol/L. METHODS: Participants received a 250 mL bolus of 3% NaCl solution, followed by 0.15 mL/min/kg body weight continuously infused targeting a plasma sodium level of 150 mmol/L. Blood samples and clinical data were collected every 30 min. RESULTS: Of the 231 participants, 16% (n = 37/231) developed hyperkalemia. The incidence of hyperkalemia was higher in healthy volunteers and in patients with primary polydipsia (25.6% (n = 23/90) and 9.9% (n = 14/141), respectively), and only occurred in 3.4% (n = 2/59) of patients with diabetes insipidus. Hyperkalemia developed mostly at or after 90-min test duration (81.1%, n => 30/37). Predictors of hyperkalemia (OR (95% CI)) were male sex (2.9 (1.2-7.4), P => 0.02), a plasma potassium at baseline > 3.9 mmol/L (5.2 (1.8-17.3), P => 0.004), normonatremia at 30-min test duration (3.2 (1.2-9.5), P => 0.03), and an increase in potassium levels already at 30-min test duration as compared to baseline (4.5 (1.7-12.3), P => 0.003). Hyperkalemia was transient and resolved spontaneously in all cases. CONCLUSION: The hypertonic saline test can lead to hyperkalemia, especially in patients with primary polydipsia who experience a longer test duration. Monitoring potassium levels in these patients is recommended.

A Subset of Primary Polydipsia, "Dipsogneic Diabetes Insipidus", in Apparently Healthy People Due to Excessive Water Intake: Not Enough Light to Illuminate the Dark Tunnel.

Dipsogenic diabetes insipidus (DDI) is a subtype of primary polydipsia (PP), which occurs mostly in healthy people without psychiatric disease. In contrast, PP is characterized by a polyuria polydipsia syndrome (PPS) associated with psychiatric illness. However, the pathogenesis of DDI is not well established and remains unexplored. In order to diagnose DDI, the patient should exhibit excessive thirst as the main symptom, in addition to no history of psychiatric illness, polyuria with low urine osmolality, and intact urine concentrating ability. Treatment options for DDI remain scarce. On this front, there have been two published case reports with successful attempts at treating DDI patients. The noteworthy commonalities in these reports are that the patient was diagnosed with frequent excessive intake of water due to a belief that drinking excess water would have pathologic benefits. It could therefore be hypothesized that the increasing trend of excessive fluid intake in people who are health conscious could also contribute to DDI. Hence, this review provides an overview of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment, with a special emphasis on habitual polydipsia and DDI.

Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of diabetes insipidus: Update.

The two main differential diagnoses of central diabetes insipidus are nephrogenic diabetes insipidus and primary polydipsia. Reliable distinction between those entities is essential as treatment differs substantially with the wrong treatment potentially leading to serious complications. Past diagnostic measures using the indirect water deprivation test had several pitfalls, resulting in a low diagnostic accuracy. With the introduction of copeptin, a stable and reliable surrogate marker for arginine vasopressin, diagnosis of diabetes insipidus was new evaluated. While unstimulated basal copeptin measurement reliably diagnoses nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, a stimulation test is needed to differentiate patients with central diabetes insipidus from patients with primary polydipsia. Stimulation can either be achieved through hypertonic saline infusion or arginine infusion. While the former showed high diagnostic accuracy and superiority over the indirect water deprivation test in a recent validation study, the diagnostic accuracy for arginine-stimulated copeptin was slightly lower, but superior in test tolerance. In summary of the recent findings, a new copeptin based diagnostic algorithm is proposed for the reliable diagnosis of diabetes insipidus.

Diabetes Insipidus: An Update.

The differential diagnosis of diabetes insipidus involves the distinction between central or nephrogenic diabetes insipidus and primary polydipsia. Differentiation is important because treatment strategies vary; the wrong treatment can be dangerous. Reliable differentiation is difficult especially in patients with primary polydipsia or partial forms of diabetes insipidus. New diagnostic algorithms are based on the measurement of copeptin after osmotic stimulation by hypertonic saline infusion or after nonosmotic stimulation by arginine and have a higher diagnostic accuracy than the water deprivation test. Treatment involves correcting preexisting water deficits, but is different for central diabetes insipidus, nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, and primary polydipsia.

Rapid differential diagnosis of diabetes insipidus in a 7-month-old infant: The copeptin approach.

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes insipidus is characterized by hypoosmotic polyuria related to deficiency of arginine-vasopressin (AVP) secretion (central diabetes insipidus, CDI) or renal insensitivity to AVP (nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, NDI). The water deprivation test with assessment of AVP activity is currently the gold standard for differential diagnosis in patients presenting polyuria-polydipsia syndrome. Nevertheless, it can be dangerous without proper surveillance and its interpretation may be challenging. Other markers have been suggested. Direct quantification of circulating AVP is not sufficient for diagnosis: vasopressin is unstable, analysis is complex. AVP comes from prohormone preprovasopressin with concomitant release of copeptin (C-terminal moiety) in the equimolar ratio. Copeptin is stable in vitro, with easy and rapid measurement (<4h). Past studies have shown greater sensitivity and specificity of copeptin versus AVP to discriminate etiologies of polyuria in adults, but its value has not been demonstrated in infants yet. OBSERVATION: A 7-month-old infant presented polyuria-polydipsia syndrome with poor weight gain. Laboratory tests pointed out hypernatremia (170mmol/L) and blood hyperosmolarity (330mOsm/L) with inappropriate urinary hypoosmolarity (168mOsm/L). Plasmatic copeptin measurement was found at a very high level, 303pmol/L (1-14pmol/L). DdAVP administration did not improve the polyuria, confirming the final diagnosis of NDI. Hyperhydration with a hypoosmolar diet normalized the hydration status and circulating levels of copeptin within 1 week. CONCLUSION: Copeptin, a stable peptide reflecting AVP secretion, could be a safer and faster biomarker for etiological diagnosis of polyuria-polydipsia syndrome in children. Before regularization of hydration status, a single baseline measurement may be enough to discriminate NDI from other etiologies without the water deprivation test.

Copeptin as a biomarker and a diagnostic tool in the evaluation of patients with polyuria-polydipsia and hyponatremia.

Copeptin is part of the 164 amino acid precursor protein preprovasopressin together with vasopressin and neurophysin II. During precursor processing, copeptin is released together with vasopressin. Copeptin concentrations respond as rapidly as vasopressin to changes in osmolality, a decrease in blood pressure or stress and there is a close correlation of vasopressin and copeptin concentrations. For these reasons, copeptin is propagated as a surrogate marker for vasopressin in the differential diagnosis of the polyuria-polydipsia syndromes and hyponatremia. Results of prospective studies show that a baseline copeptin level without prior fluid deprivation >20 pmol/L is able to identify patients with nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, whereas osmotically stimulated copeptin levels differentiate between patients with partial central diabetes insipidus and primary polydipsia with a high sensitivity and specificity >94%. In hyponatremia, low copeptin levels point to primary polydipsia and high levels to hypovolemic hyponatremia. The copeptin to urinary sodium ratio differentiates accurately between volume-depleted and normovolemic disorders.