The role of gut barrier dysfunction in postoperative complications in liver transplantation: pathophysiological and therapeutic considerations.

PURPOSE: Gut barrier dysfunction is a pivotal pathophysiological alteration in cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease, which is further aggravated during and after the operational procedures for liver transplantation (LT). In this review, we analyze the multifactorial disruption of all major levels of defense of the gut barrier (biological, mechanical, and immunological) and correlate with clinical implications. METHODS: A narrative review of the literature was performed using PubMed, PubMed Central and Google from inception until November 29th, 2023. RESULTS: Systemic translocation of indigenous bacteria through this dysfunctional barrier contributes to the early post-LT infectious complications, while endotoxin translocation, through activation of the systemic inflammatory response, is implicated in non-infectious complications including renal dysfunction and graft rejection. Bacterial infections are the main cause of early in-hospital mortality of LT patients and unraveling the pathophysiology of gut barrier failure is of outmost importance. CONCLUSION: A pathophysiology-based approach to prophylactic or therapeutic interventions may lead to enhancement of gut barrier function eliminating its detrimental consequences and leading to better outcomes for LT patients.

Infectious complications following major heart surgery from the day of the surgery to hospital discharge.

BACKGROUND: At some point in their lives, many people will require major heart surgery (MHS). Patients are generally older adults with various risk factors for infection. However, the incidence of infection after MHS is poorly known, as reported infection data are frequently biased due to different factors like the surgical procedure, postoperative timing, and infectious syndromes or etiologic agents, among others. In addition, most patient data are retrospectively obtained. PURPOSE AND METHODS: Data were prospectively collected regarding the incidence of all nosocomial infections produced from the time of surgery to hospital discharge in a cohort of 800 adults consecutively undergoing a MHS procedure. RESULTS: During postoperative hospitalization, 124 of the 800 participants developed one or more infections (15.5%): during their ICU stay in 68 patients (54.8%), during their stay on the general ward post ICU in 50 (40.3%), and during their stay in both wards in 6 (4.8%). The most common infections were pneumonia (related or not to mechanical ventilation), surgical site and bloodstream. As etiological agents, 193 pathogens were isolated: mostly Gram-negative bacilli (54.4%), followed by Gram-positive bacteria (30%), viruses (4.6%) and fungi (1.5%). In our cohort, all-cause mortality was recorded in 33 participants (4.1%) and 9 infection-related deaths (1.1%) were produced. Among subjects who developed infections, overall mortality was 13.7% and in those who did not, this was only 2.3%. CONCLUSION: Infection following MHS remains frequent and severe. Our data suggest that hospital-acquired infection studies should consider episodes of infection in all populations during their entire hospital stay and not only those related to specific clinical syndromes or acquired while the patient is in intensive care.

Systemic glucocorticoid exposure and postoperative infection risk in 143,782 appendectomy patients-a Danish longitudinal nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoids are conventionally associated with increased postoperative infection risk. It is necessary to clarify if preoperative glucocorticoid exposure is associated with postoperative infection in appendectomy patients and if the association is different for open and laparoscopic appendectomies. METHODS: A Danish nationwide study of appendectomy patients between 1996 and 2018. Exposures were defined as high (≥ 5 mg) versus no/low (< 5 mg) glucocorticoid exposure in milligram prednisone-equivalents/day preoperatively. The main outcome was any postoperative infection. Then, 90-day cumulative incidences (absolute risk) and adjusted hazard ratios (relative risk) of the outcome were calculated for high versus no/low glucocorticoid exposure within all appendectomies and within open and laparoscopic subgroups. Propensity-score matching was used for sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Of 143,782 patients, median age was 29 years, 74,543 were female, and 7654 experienced at least one infection during the 90-day follow-up. The 90-day cumulative incidence for postoperative infection was 5.3% within the no/low glucocorticoid exposure group and 10.0% within the high glucocorticoid exposure group. Compared to no/low glucocorticoid exposure, adjusted hazard ratios for 90-day postoperative infection with high glucocorticoid exposure were 1.25 [95% CI 1.02-1.52; p = 0.03] for all appendectomies, 1.59 [1.16-2.18; p = 0.004] for laparoscopic appendectomies, and 1.09 [0.85-1.40; p = 0.52] for open appendectomies (pinteraction < 0.001). The results were robust to sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Preoperative high (≥ 5 mg/day) glucocorticoid exposure was associated with increased absolute risk of postoperative infections in open and laparoscopic appendectomies. The relative risk increase was significant for laparoscopic but not open appendectomies, possibly due to lower absolute risk with no/low glucocorticoid exposure in the laparoscopic subgroup.

What Is a Surgical Site Infection After Carpal Tunnel Release?

PURPOSE: Considerable variation exists in the literature on published rates of surgical site infection (SSI) after carpal tunnel release, ranging over 20-fold, from 0.28% to 6.4%. The reason for this variability is unknown. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on 748 open carpal tunnel releases performed under wide-awake local anesthetic no tourniquet in an in-office procedure room. The following three different definitions of infection were used for analysis: definition A: prescription of an oral antibiotic; Definition B: SSI definition by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Definition C: infection that required reoperation. RESULTS: Infection rate by definition A was 8.9% (67/748), by definition B was 2.3% (17/748), and by definition C was 0.4% (3/748), resulting in a 22-fold range. CONCLUSIONS: The infection rate after carpal tunnel release is heavily influenced by the definition of SSI. The definition of SSI needs to be considered when making comparisons, either in research or quality assurance/quality improvement applications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When analyzing SSI rates, the exact definition of infection must be ascertained to accurately compare an individual's practice or institutional data to the literature.

Impact of postoperative intravenous iron therapy on postoperative infections in older patients with severe anaemia after hip fracture surgery.

BACKGROUND: Anaemia is common following hip fracture in ortho-geriatric patients and is associated with postoperative infections.. This study investigated whether intravenous iron supplements reduced the rate of postoperative infections within 30 days postoperatively in older adults after hip fracture surgery. METHODS: This observational study included 198 ortho-geriatric patients July 2018-May 2020. In May 2019 a local guideline was implemented and recommended II therapy on the 3rd postoperative day if haemoglobin concentration was < 6.5 mmol/L after hip fracture surgery. RESULTS: The patients were divided into four treatment groups: blood transfusion (n = 44), IV iron (n = 69), blood transfusion + IV iron (n = 35) and no treatment (n = 50). The number of patients who had an infection within 30 days was similar in the two time periods (38.8% before vs. 38.9% after systematic I.V. iron supplementation, P = 1.00) and no significant difference according to risk of infection was found between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: This study documents no effect of intravenous iron supplements on postoperative infections in older adults after hip fracture surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the Danish Data Protection Authority (2008-58-0028) the 2th of September 2019.

Prediction of postoperative infection in elderly using deep learning-based analysis: an observational cohort study.

Elderly patients are susceptible to postoperative infections with increased mortality. Analyzing with a deep learning model, the perioperative factors that could predict and/or contribute to postoperative infections may improve the outcome in elderly. This was an observational cohort study with 2014 elderly patients who had elective surgery from 28 hospitals in China from April to June 2014. We aimed to develop and validate deep learning-based predictive models for postoperative infections in the elderly. 1510 patients were randomly assigned to be training dataset for establishing deep learning-based models, and 504 patients were used to validate the effectiveness of these models. The conventional model predicted postoperative infections was 0.728 (95% CI 0.688-0.768) with the sensitivity of 66.2% (95% CI 58.2-73.6) and specificity of 66.8% (95% CI 64.6-68.9). The deep learning model including risk factors relevant to baseline clinical characteristics predicted postoperative infections was 0.641 (95% CI 0.545-0.737), and sensitivity and specificity were 34.2% (95% CI 19.6-51.4) and 88.8% (95% CI 85.6-91.6), respectively. Including risk factors relevant to baseline variables and surgery, the deep learning model predicted postoperative infections was 0.763 (95% CI 0.681-0.844) with the sensitivity of 63.2% (95% CI 46-78.2) and specificity of 80.5% (95% CI 76.6-84). Our feasibility study indicated that a deep learning model including risk factors for the prediction of postoperative infections can be achieved in elderly. Further study is needed to assess whether this model can be used to guide clinical practice to improve surgical outcomes in elderly.

The effect of preoperative clindamycin in reducing early oral implant failure: a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of preoperative oral clindamycin in reducing early implant failure in healthy adults undergoing conventional implant placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in accordance with the ethical principles and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement. We included healthy adults who underwent a single oral implant without previous infection of the surgical bed or the need for bone grafting. They were randomly treated with a single dose of oral clindamycin (600 mg) 1 h before surgery or a placebo. All surgical procedures were performed by one surgeon. A single trained observer evaluated all patients on postoperative days 1, 7, 14, 28, and 56. Early dental implant failure was defined as the loss or removal of an implant for any reason. We recorded the clinical, radiological, and surgical variables, adverse events, and postoperative complications. The study outcomes were statistically analysed to evaluate differences between the groups. Furthermore, we calculated the number required to treat or harm (NNT/NNH). RESULTS: Both the control group and clindamycin group had 31 patients each. Two implant failures occurred in the clindamycin group (NNH = 15, p = 0.246). Three patients had postoperative infections, namely two placebo-treated and one clindamycin-treated, which failed (relative risk: 0.5, CI: 0.05-5.23, absolute risk reduction = 0.03, confidence interval: - 0.07-0.13, NNT = 31, CI: 7.2-∞, and p = 0.5). One clindamycin-treated patient experienced gastrointestinal disturbances and diarrhoea. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative clindamycin administration during oral implant surgery in healthy adults may not reduce implant failure or post-surgical-complications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Oral clindamycin is not efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The present trial was registered (EudraCT number: 2017-002,168-42). It was approved by the Committee for the Ethics of Research with Medicines of Euskadi (CEIm-E) on 31 October 2018 (internal code number: 201862) and the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS) on 18 December 2018.

Comparative effectiveness of oral antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in the prevention of postoperative infections in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: A network meta-analysis.

Oral antibiotics (OAB), probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics are reported to be effective for preventing postoperative infection following colorectal surgery, but the comparative effectiveness between them has not been studied. To compare these interventions through a network meta-analysis. Ovid Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from inception to January 1, 2022 without any language restriction. Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved articles, assessed risk of bias, and extracted information from the included randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was infection rate, and the secondary outcome was anastomotic leakage rate. 4322 records were retrieved after literature search, and 20 RCTs recruiting 3726 participants were finally included. The analysis showed that usual care (UC) + Synbiotics ranked the most effective treatment (SUCRA = 0.968), UC + OAB ranked the second (SUCRA = 0.797), and UC + IAB ranked the third (SUCRA = 0.678) for preventing postoperative infection rate, but only UC + OAB achieved statistical significance. UC + OAB was the most effective treatment (SUCRA = 0.927) for preventing anastomotic leakage rate. Our study confirmed that preoperative administration of OAB was associated with lower infection rate and anastomotic leakage rate than placebo and UC alone. However, the beneficial effect of probiotics and synbiotics should still be investigated by large-scale randomised controlled trials.

A Double-blinded, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Non-hysterectomy Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Gynecologic Conditions: A Pilot Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a double-blinded randomized, placebo-controlled study in determining the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing postoperative infections (POIs) in elective nonhysterectomy laparoscopic procedures for benign gynecologic conditions. DESIGN: Double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: University-affiliated tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia. PATIENTS: Women older than 18 years undergoing elective nonhysterectomy laparoscopic procedures for benign gynecologic conditions were eligible for the study and approached. INTERVENTIONS: Before surgery, participants were randomized to receive either 2-g cephazolin or placebo (10-mL normal saline) administered by the anesthetist. Participants and other research staff were blinded to group allocation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was study feasibility measured by recruitment rates, compliance rates of drug administration, compliance rates of delivery, maintenance of double blinding, and follow-up rates. Secondary outcomes included rate of POIs, length of hospitalization, readmission to hospital, unscheduled presentations to healthcare facilities, and antibiotic-related reactions. Between February 2019 and March 2021, 170 patients were approached with 117 participants (68.8%) recruited and randomized. The study had a high compliance rate of trial drug delivery (95.7%) and a high follow-up rate (99.1%). CONCLUSION: This pilot study has demonstrated feasibility of a large-scale study with a recruitment rate of 68% of patients approached and excellent trial drug delivery and follow-up rates. As anticipated, it is underpowered for identifying clinically significant findings for POI rates. A large-scale study is appropriate and essential to determine the health-related risks of antibiotic prophylaxis with an emphasis on antimicrobial stewardship. The sample size for a large-scale study is 1678 participants based on infection rates in this pilot study.

Vaginal preparation with different antiseptic solutions before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

AIMS: We aimed to investigate the effect of various vaginal wash solutions on reducing risks of post-cesarean endometritis, wound infections, fever, and hospital stay duration. METHODS: Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized clinical trials that compared different vaginal wash solutions to each other or to "no vaginal cleaning"; without restriction on the age of parturients or site where trials were conducted. We analyzed this frequentist network meta-analysis using the netmeta package in R software version 4.1.2; synthesized data as mean difference or risk ratio with their 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Our network meta-analysis included 29 RCTs with a total sample size of 9311 women undergoing CS. Regarding post-cesarean endometritis, we found that povidone-iodine had the highest significant risk reduction compared to "no vaginal cleaning" (RR = 0.08, 95% CI [0.01, 0.69]). While regarding post-cesarean reduction of wound infection, fever, and hospital stay duration, we found that chlorhexidine 4% (RR = 0.17, 95% CI [0.05, 0.65]), saline 0.9% (RR = 0.12, 95% CI [0.03; 0.48]), and saline 0.9% (MD = -1.29, 95% CI [-2.18; -0.39]), respectively, had the highest significant risk reduction compared to "no vaginal cleaning." CONCLUSION: Vaginal wash solutions were associated with a significant reduction of post-cesarean endometritis, wound infection, fever, and hospital stay duration. Since povidone-iodine had the highest significant reduction of post-cesarean endometritis, we recommend setting povidone-iodine as the standard practice as pre cesarean vaginal wash solution; consistent practice guidelines of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS).

Honey dressing: a missed way for orthopaedic wound care.

PURPOSE: Orthopaedic-related wounds are critical situations calling for care to avoid deep infections and its consequences. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of using honey for care of orthopaedic-related wounds with limited resources. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 50 cases with an average age of 38.18 (range 17-63) years with 38 males and 12 females. The most frequent wound location was the leg (41 patients; 82%), then the foot (six patients; 12%), and the ankle in three patients (6%). The aetiologies were open fractures (34 cases; 68%), infected tibial non-unions (nine cases; 18%), and post-operative infections (seven cases; 14%). Exposed tendon was present in three cases. Bone exposure was present in two cases. Deep infection was present in 29 cases (58%). Besides treating the primary cause, a ribbon of gauze soaked with honey was applied to the wounds after thorough saline washing. RESULTS: Wound sizes were variable. All cases showed improvement in all parameters with complete wound healing and full coverage of bone and tendons. Recurrence of deep infection occurred in three cases and treated by debridement. One case needed sequestrectomy of a small exposed tibial cortical fragment. Exposed tendon cases showed superficial necrosis which was treated by simple debridement. Initial mild itching occurred in five patients with spontaneous resolution. CONCLUSION: With treating the underlying aetiology and optimising the patient's general condition, honey was an effective, simple, and affordable method of wound care in different orthopaedic conditions even with exposed bone or tendons.

Do we need postoperative antibiotics in supratentorial clean neurosurgery? A prospective, randomized, single-blind, and placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: To assess the efficacy of postoperative antibiotics on postoperative infection in clean supratentorial craniotomies. METHODS: This study is a prospective, randomized, single-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial that included consecutive patients who underwent clean supratentorial craniotomy between November 2017 and September 2020 and evaluated the effectiveness of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis on postoperative infection. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients were included and the whole group was divided into two groups. Group A included patients who received antibiotic prophylaxis and group B who did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis after surgery. Each group included the same number of patients (40 patients in each). Two patients showed postoperative infection, and both were in group B. No significant difference was found regarding postoperative infection between the two groups (p = 0.15). The rate of postoperative infection was found to be 2.5% in the whole group (2 cases out of 80) and it was 5% in group B (2 cases out of 40). DISCUSSION: Our results showed that antibiotic prophylaxis after a clean supratentorial craniotomy has no effect on the prevention of postoperative infection and we do not suggest using antibiotic prophylaxis after clean supratentorial neurosurgery.

Probiotics as Prophylaxis for Postoperative Infections of Under-five Children Following Gastrointestinal Surgery.

Purpose: Evaluation of the efficacy of use of probiotics as prophylaxis for postoperative wound infection in under-five children following gastrointestinal surgery. Materials and Methods: This randomized control trial was conducted over a period of 2 years in the pediatric surgery units of a tertiary level hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh. A total of 60 patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery under the age of 5 years were included in the study and randomly assigned to two groups - probiotics group (n = 30) and nonprobiotics group (n = 30). Patients in the probiotics group received probiotics in the preoperative (3 days) and postoperative period (7 days) along with traditional gut preparation (antibiotics and mechanical bowel wash). Patients in the nonprobiotic group got only antibiotics and traditional gut preparation. Outcome variables were surgical site infection, fever, c-reactive protein (CRP), total white blood cell (WBC) count, and neutrophil count. Results: Postoperative wound infection was less in the probiotic group (n = 2) compared to the nonprobiotic group (n = 3), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.640). Postoperative CRP level was significantly lower in the probiotics group (P = 0.020). There was more decline in total count of WBCs in postoperative period in the probiotic group. No statistical difference was seen between the groups in postoperative pyrexia, the total count of WBC, and neutrophil count. Conclusion: Use of probiotics along with traditional gut preparation as prophylaxis for postoperative infection in children showed no added benefit in comparison to the use of traditional gut preparation only.

The Dynamics of Heparin-Binding Protein in Cardiothoracic Surgery-A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative dynamics of heparin-binding protein (HBP) in cardiothoracic surgery. DESIGN: This was a prospective, observational study. SETTING: The study was conducted at a single university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were included, 15 of whom underwent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery and 15 of whom underwent complex procedures. Ten patients undergoing lung surgery also were included as a conventional surgery reference group. INTERVENTIONS: No interventions were performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: HBP was measured at nine different perioperative times. HBP levels increased immediately after heparin administration, further increased during CPB, but decreased rapidly after protamine administration. At arrival to the intensive care unit, median HBP levels were 24.8 (15.6-38.1) ng/mL for coronary artery bypass grafting patients and 51.2 (34.0-117.7) ng/mL for complex surgery patients (p = 0.011). One day after surgery, HBP levels in all three groups were below the proposed cutoff of 30 ng/mL, which previously was found to predict development of organ dysfunction in patients with infection. CONCLUSIONS: HBP levels are elevated by the administration of heparin and the use of CPB but reduced by protamine administration. At postoperative day one, HBP levels were less than the threshold for organ dysfunction in patients with infection. The usefulness of HBP for predicting postoperative infections in cardiothoracic surgery should be investigated in future studies.

Infection due to Mycoplasma hominis after left hip replacement: case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Hip replacement is generally conducted in those with prolonged arthritis pain or hip fractures, and postoperative infection is a serious complication. Mycoplasma hominis, belonging to mycoplasma species, exists mainly in the genitourinary tract. M. hominis infection after total hip replacement was rarely documented in literature. CASE PRESENTATION: A 59-year-old male was febrile after left total hip replacement. Empiric therapy with cefepime for suspected infection was ineffective. Specimens at the infection site were collected for culture, and pinpoint colonies grew after incubation at 35 °C for 48 h on blood agar plate. They grew to approximately 0.5 mm colonies in diameter after 7-day incubation, and were identified as M. hominis. Sequentially, combination therapy with clindamycin hydrochloride and moxifloxacin was initiated, and the patient defervesced within 3 days and was discharged home. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlighted the potential pathogenicity of M. hominis in postoperative infection. The possibility of this microorganism involvement should be valued if the patients who experienced the hip or joint replacement had inexplicable fever.

Does bacterial translocation influence the postoperative infections in splenectomized patients after abdominal trauma?

BACKGROUND: Some studies suggested that after abdominal trauma, postoperative infections are associated with bacterial translocation, whereas others have not replicated these findings. We have assessed the bacterial translocation and postoperative infections in patients undergoing splenectomy after abdominal trauma, using a very homogeneous study population. METHODS: We consecutively studied, in a prospective observational clinical study, 125 patients who required urgent surgical treatment (splenectomy) following blunt abdominal trauma. For bacterial translocation identification, tissue samples were taken from liver, spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs). Postoperative infectious complications in these patients were registered, confirmed by a positive culture obtained from the septic focus. Associations between clinical variables, bacterial translocation presence, and postoperative infection development were established. RESULTS: Bacterial translocation was detected in 47 (37.6%) patients. Postoperative infections were present in 29 (23.2%) patients. A significant statistical difference was found between postoperative infections in patients with bacterial translocation evidence (22 of 47 patients: 46.8%) in comparison with patients without bacterial translocation (7 of 78 patients: 8.9%) (P < 0.05). After multivariate adjustment analysis: a) the bleeding ≥ 1500 mL was significantly associated with the risk of bacterial translocation and, b) bacterial translocation was significantly associated with the risk of postoperative infections. Bacterial strains isolated from infection sites were the same as those cultured in MLNs in 48.3% of the cases (n = 14 of 29). CONCLUSIONS: There is higher risk of bacterial translocation in patients who required urgent surgical treatment (splenectomy) following blunt abdominal trauma and it is associated with a significant higher number of postoperative infections.

Immune function monitoring in lung transplantation using adenosine triphosphate production: time trends and relationship to postoperative infection.

PURPOSE: The ImmuKnow (IK) assay is a comprehensive immune function test that involves measuring adenosine triphosphate produced by the cluster of differentiation 4+ T lymphocytes in peripheral blood. The aim of this study was to analyze the time trends of IK values and assess the relationship between IK values and infections in lung transplants. METHODS: We prospectively collected 178 blood samples from 22 deceased-donor lung transplant (DDLT) recipients and 17 living-donor lobar lung transplant (LDLLT) recipients. A surveillance IK assay was performed postoperatively, then after 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Time trends of IK values in stable recipients peaked 1 week after DDLT (477 ± 247 ATP ng/ml), and 1 month after LDLLT (433 ± 134 ng/ml), followed by a gradual decline over 1 year. The mean IK values in infections were significantly lower than those in the stable state (119 vs 312 ATP ng/ml, p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: IK values increased sharply after lung transplantation and then decreased gradually over time in the first year, suggesting a natural history of immune function. IK values were also significantly reduced during infections. These results may provide new insights into the utility of immune monitoring after lung transplantation.

Leukocyte filtration and postoperative infections.

BACKGROUND: Leukocyte filtration has been hypothesized to reduce the risk of postoperative infections by alleviating the immunosuppressive effect of whole blood. However, the literature regarding the clinical efficacy of leukocyte filtration remains conflicted. This meta-analysis investigates the impact of allogeneic and autologous leukocyte-filtered blood transfusions on the incidence of postoperative infections in adult surgical patients. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled trials (1966-2016) was completed for all published randomized controlled trials. Postoperative infections under "as-per-protocol" (APP) and "intention-to-treat" (ITT), length of stay, and mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixteen randomized controlled trials involving 6586 randomized (ITT) patients (4615 APP patients) in various clinical settings were evaluated. The leukocyte-filtered blood group demonstrated an overall 26% risk reduction in postoperative infections when analyzed by APP (relative risk [RR] = 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI, 0.60-0.92]; P = 0.007) and a 22% risk reduction when analyzed by ITT (RR = 0.78; 95% CI [0.65-0.94]; P = 0.009). Leukocyte-filtered blood was also associated with a significant reduction in length of stay (standardized difference of mean [SDM] = -0.74; 95% CI [-1.32 to -0.15]; P = 0.014) and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.74; 95% CI [0.57-0.95]; P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Leukocyte-filtered blood transfusions are associated with significantly lower postoperative infection rates in both the APP and ITT populations. Leukocyte filtration also shortens length of stay and decreases all-cause mortality in surgical patients and should be considered in all surgical patients.

Implementation of perioperative blood glucose monitoring and insulin infusion protocol can decrease postoperative infection rate in diabetic patients undergoing elective craniotomy: An observational study.

BACKGROUND: Severe perioperative hyperglycemia (SH) is a proven risk factor for postoperative complications after craniotomy. To reduce this risk, it has been proposed to implement the standardized clinical protocol for scheduled perioperative blood glucose concentration (BGC) monitoring. This would be followed by intravenous (IV) insulin infusion to keep BGC below 180 mg/dl in the perioperative period. The aim of this prospective observational study was to assess the impact of this type of protocol on the postoperative infection rate in patients undergoing elective craniotomy. METHODS: A total of 42 patients were prospectively enrolled in the study. Protocol included scheduled BGC monitoring in the perioperative period and rapid-acting insulin IV infusion when intraoperative SH was detected. The diagnosis of infection (wound, pulmonary, blood stream, urinary tract infection or central nervous system infection) was established according to CDC criteria within the first postoperative week. A previously enrolled group of patients with sporadic BGC monitoring and subcutaneous insulin injections for SH management was used as a control group. RESULTS: An infectious complication (i.e., pneumonia) was diagnosed only in one patient (2 %) in the prospective group. In comparison with the control group, a decrease in the risk of postoperative infection was statistically significant with OR = 0.08 [0.009 - 0.72] (p = 0.02). Implementation of the perioperative BGC monitoring and the correction protocol prevented both severe hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia with BGC < 70 mg/dl. CONCLUSION: Scheduled BGC monitoring and the use of low-dose insulin infusion protocol can decrease the postoperative infection rate in patients undergoing elective craniotomy. Future studies are needed to prove the causality of the implementation of such a protocol with an improved outcome.

A network meta-analysis of the timing of wound dressing removal.

INTRODUCTION: Wounds are invariably dressed postoperatively but the evidence for the timing of dressing changes is limited. This meta-analysis evaluated whether the relative risk of wound infection varies depending on when dressings are changed. METHODS: A frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis was conducted on the results of a systematic review of the MEDLINE®, Ovid®, Scopus®, Web of Science™ and PubMed® databases and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials performed in May 2023. Evidence quality was graded using the Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis tool. RESULTS: A total of 4 studies were included with 878 patients. A significant increase in the relative risk of wound infection was found when dressings were left in situ for more than 4.5 days when compared with 48 hours (3.18, 95% confidence interval: 1.22-8.33). There were no significant differences in the relative risk of infection between the other groups. Model heterogeneity and inconsistency were insignificant (Cochran's Q: 0.44, p=0.51). The quality of the evidence was graded as generally very low and risk of bias evaluations showed it to be of high concern for bias. CONCLUSIONS: Late dressing changes significantly increase the risks of wound infection and changes at 48 hours minimise these risks. There was no advantage demonstrated for earlier dressing changes. Ensuring that dressings are changed appropriately can minimise patient harm and health service costs.