RESUMO
We conducted this study to systematically review and assess the current clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) related to the diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. The aim was to evaluate the quality of these included CPGs and provide clinicians with a convenient and comprehensive reference for updating their own CPGs. We searched four databases to identify eligible CPGs focusing on H. pylori diagnosis and treatment recommendations. The results were presented using evidence mappings. Quality and clinical applicability were assessed comprehensively using AGREE-II and AGREE-REX. Statistical tests, specifically Bonferroni tests, were employed to compare the quality between evidence-based guidelines and consensus. A total of 30 eligible CPGs were included, comprising 17 consensuses and 13 guidelines. The quality showed no statistical significance between consensuses and guidelines, mainly within the moderate to low range. Notably, recommendations across CPGs exhibited inconsistency. Nevertheless, concerning diagnosis, the urea breath test emerged as the most frequently recommended method for testing H. pylori. Regarding treatment, bismuth quadruple therapy stood out as the predominantly recommended eradication strategy, with high-dose dual therapy being a newly recommended option. Our findings suggest the need for specific organizations to update their CPGs on H. pylori or refer to recently published CPGs. Specifically, CPGs for pediatric cases require improvement and updating, while a notable absence of CPGs for the elderly was observed. Furthermore, there is a pressing need to improve the overall quality of CPGs related to H. pylori. Regarding recommendations, additional evidence is essential to elucidate the relationship between H. pylori infection and other diseases and refine test indications. Clinicians are encouraged to consider bismuth quadruple or high-dose dual therapy, incorporating locally sensitive antibiotics, as empirical radical therapy. .
Assuntos
Infecções por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Humanos , Testes Respiratórios , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bismuto/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia CombinadaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dupilumab is a new targeted therapy for severe atopic dermatitis (AD) with limited real-world evidence. OBJECTIVE: Explore our experience with dupilumab for AD in clinical practice at a tertiary care center. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Unicentric observational retrospective study including adult and pediatric patients with severe AD receiving dupilumab between December 2017 and December 2021. The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score, Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS) and Sleep disturbance Numerical Rating Scale (S-NRS) were recovered to assess severity and response. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients received dupilumab: 52, 48, 26 and 13 patients reached 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of treatment, respectively. The EASI-75 response rates were 94.2%, 95.8%, 92.3% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The EASI-90 response rates were 63.5%, 72.9%, 84.6% and 92.3% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The EASI <7 response rates were 92.3%, 91.7%, 88.5% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The P-NRS ≥4 reduction rates were 86%, 87.5%, 92.3% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The S-NRS ≥4 reduction rates were 82.7%, 85.4%, 100% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. Adverse events were mild and occurred in 20.3% of patients, all of them adults. CONCLUSION: Our findings support dupilumab's favorable efficacy and tolerability profile in clinical practice. Dupilumab offers a rapid and sustained response, regardless of combined therapy. Longer follow-ups are still required to adequately assess its performance.
Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Prurido/induzido quimicamente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dupilumab is a new targeted therapy for severe atopic dermatitis (AD) with limited real-world evidence. OBJECTIVE: Explore our experience with dupilumab for AD in clinical practice at a tertiary care center. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Unicentric observational retrospective study including adult and pediatric patients with severe AD receiving dupilumab between December 2017 and December 2021. The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score, Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS) and Sleep disturbance Numerical Rating Scale (S-NRS) were recovered to assess severity and response. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients received dupilumab: 52, 48, 26 and 13 patients reached 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of treatment, respectively. The EASI-75 response rates were 94.2%, 95.8%, 92.3% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The EASI-90 response rates were 63.5%, 72.9%, 84.6% and 92.3% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The EASI <7 response rates were 92.3%, 91.7%, 88.5% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The P-NRS ≥4 reduction rates were 86%, 87.5%, 92.3% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The S-NRS ≥4 reduction rates were 82.7%, 85.4%, 100% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. Adverse events were mild and occurred in 20.3% of patients, all of them adults. CONCLUSION: Our findings support dupilumab's favorable efficacy and tolerability profile in clinical practice. Dupilumab offers a rapid and sustained response, regardless of combined therapy. Longer follow-ups are still required to adequately assess its performance.
Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Prurido/induzido quimicamente , Resultado do Tratamento , Método Duplo-CegoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Combinations of topical (TT) and biological therapies (BT) are a common thing in the routine clinical practice. However, the scientific medical literature on how TT is, actually, used after the initiation of BT is scarce, particularly in combination with anti-IL17, or anti-IL23. OBJECTIVES: To describe the frequency of the concomitant use of TT + BT at baseline and after a 6-month course of several drugs (anti-IL17, ustekinumab, and anti-IL23). Our secondary endpoints are to describe the type of topical therapy used, compare the frequency of use of TT among the different groups of BT, describe the survival of topical therapy in these patients, and identify the factors that can impact the use or discontinuation of topical therapy in these patients (clinical response, quality of life, type of drug, etc.). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, and single-center study of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with anti-IL17 (secukinumab, ixekizumab), anti-IL17R (brodalumab), ustekinumab, and guselkumab from January 2015 through December 2020. RESULTS: We included a total of 138 patients. When treatment started, 82.7% were on TT (55% daily), and after 6 months, 86.6% had discontinued TT. Regarding the analysis by type of drug, at 6 months, we found that 100% of the patients with BRO had discontinued topical treatment. We did not find any significant differences in the frequency of use of TT based on the BT used during the 6-month course of treatment. The estimated mean course of TT was 4.3 months (SD, 6.7). Also, the estimated mean course of TT was significantly shorter in the group of patients who achieved PASI100 (2.8 months vs. 8.1 months). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, we saw a significant decrease in the frequency of use of TT at 6 months after starting BT in the routine clinical practice. This reduction occurred earlier in patients who improved their objective clinical response and quality of life.
Assuntos
Interleucina-17 , Interleucina-23 , Psoríase , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Humanos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Interleucina-23/antagonistas & inibidores , Feminino , Interleucina-17/antagonistas & inibidores , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ustekinumab/uso terapêutico , Ustekinumab/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Quimioterapia Combinada , Qualidade de Vida , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Administração Tópica , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administração & dosagemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease that compromises the colon, affecting the quality of life of individuals of any age. In practice, there is a wide spectrum of clinical situations. The advances made in the physio pathogenesis of UC have allowed the development of new, more effective and safer therapeutic agents. OBJECTIVES: To update and expand the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of relevant treatments for remission induction and maintenance after a mild, moderate or severe flare of UC. RECIPIENTS: Gastroenterologists, coloproctologists, general practitioners, family physicians and others health professionals, interested in the treatment of UC. METHODOLOGY: GADECCU authorities obtained authorization from GETECCU to adapt and update the GETECCU 2020 Guide for the treatment of UC. Prepared with GRADE methodology. A team was formed that included authors, a panel of experts, a nurse and a patient, methodological experts, and external reviewers. GRADE methodology was used with the new information. RESULTS: A 118-page document was prepared with the 44 GADECCU 2022 recommendations, for different clinical situations and therapeutic options, according to levels of evidence. A section was added with the new molecules that are about to be available. CONCLUSIONS: This guideline has been made in order to facilitate decision-making regarding the treatment of UC, adapting and updating the guide prepared by GETECCU in the year 2020.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Humanos , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Qualidade de Vida , Indução de RemissãoRESUMO
When working with families of infants and toddlers, intentionally looking beyond dyadic child-parent relationship functioning to conceptualize the child's socioemotional adaptation within their broader family collective can enhance the likelihood that clinical gains will be supported and sustained. However, there has been little expert guidance regarding how best to frame infant-family mental health therapeutic encounters for the adults responsible for the child's care and upbringing in a manner that elevates their mindfulness about and their resolve to strengthen the impact of their coparenting collective. This article describes a new collaborative initiative organized by family-oriented infant mental health professionals across several different countries, all of whom bring expansive expertise assessing and working with coparenting and triangular family dynamics. The Collaborative's aims are to identify a means for framing initial infant mental health encounters and intakes with families with the goal of assessing and raising family consciousness about the relevance of coparenting. Initial points of convergence and growing points identified by the Collaborative for subsequent field study are addressed.
Cuando se trabaja con familias de infantes y niños pequeñitos, el mirar intencionalmente más allá del funcionamiento de la relación diádica niño-progenitor para conceptualizar la adaptación socioemocional del niño dentro de la amplitud del colectivo familiar puede mejorar la posibilidad de que los logros clínicos sean apoyados y mantenidos. Sin embargo, ha habido poca guía de expertos acerca de cómo enmarcar mejor los encuentros terapéuticos infante-familia de salud mental para los adultos que son responsables del cuidado y crianza del niño de una manera que se eleve su estado consciente acerca de y su determinación de reforzar el impacto del colectivo en el proceso de la crianza compartida. Este artículo describe una nueva iniciativa colaborativa organizada por profesionales de la salud mental infantil orientados hacia la familia en varios diferentes países, todos los cuales aportan su conocimiento amplio evaluando y trabajando con las dinámicas familiares de crianza compartida y triangular. Las metas de este esfuerzo Colaborativo son identificar un medio para enmarcar los encuentros y la proporción de salud mental infantil con familias que se proponen evaluar y crear consciencia familiar acerca de la relevancia de la crianza compartida. Se abordan los puntos iniciales de convergencia y puntos de crecimiento identificados por el esfuerzo Colaborativo para subsecuentes estudios en el campo.
En travaillant avec des familles de nourrissons et de petits enfants, le fait de regarder délibérément au- delà du fonctionnement de la relation dyadique enfant-parent afin de conceptualisation l'adaptation socio émotionnelle de l'enfant, au sein de leur collectif familial plus large, peut accroître la probabilité que les gains cliniques seront bien soutenus et prolongés. Cependant il y a eu peu de directive experte concernant la meilleure manière d'encadrer les rencontres thérapeutiques nourrisson-famille de santé mentale pour les adultes responsables du soin de l'enfant et de son éducation d'une manière qui élève la pleine conscience et la détermination qu'il y a à renforcer l'impact de leur coparentage collectif. Cet article décrit une nouvelle initiative collaborative organisée par des professionnels de la santé mentale du nourrisson centrés sur la famille au travers de plus pays différents, tous étant de grands experts évaluant et travaillant avec des dynamiques de coparentage et de famille triangulaire. Les buts de cette collaboration sont d'identifier un moyen d'encadrer des rencontres de santé mentale initiales et les apports des familles avec le but d'évaluer et d'améliorer la conscience de la famille quant à la pertinence du coparentage. Les premiers points de convergence et de développement identifiés par la collaboration pour des études sur le terrain à venir sont discutés.
Assuntos
Saúde Mental , Atenção Plena , Adulto , Lactente , Humanos , Saúde da Família , Pessoal de Saúde , Saúde do LactenteRESUMO
Professional medical liability is the result of medical malpractice, which may be due to negligence, incompetence or carelessness. Lex Artis is the set of skills and knowledge that have been universally accepted by peers, which must be diligently applied in the specific situation of a given patient. Thus, Lex Artis is essentially everything contained in clinical practice guidelines. Judicially speaking, the practice of medicine in Mexico is an obligation of means, but not of results. Therefore, adherence to clinical practice guidelines recommendations is the most effective way to defend oneself against a malpractice lawsuit.
La responsabilidad médica profesional es el resultado de mala praxis médica, la cual puede deberse a negligencia, impericia o imprudencia. Se conoce como lex artis al conjunto de conocimientos y habilidades que han sido universalmente aceptados por los pares, los cuales deben ser diligentemente aplicados en la situación específica de un paciente determinado. Entonces, lex artis es fundamentalmente todo lo contenido en las guías para la práctica clínica. Judicialmente hablando, en México el ejercicio de la medicina es una obligación de medios, mas no de resultados. Por consiguiente, apegarse a las recomendaciones de las guías para la práctica clínica es más efectivo para defenderse de una demanda legal por mala praxis.
Assuntos
Imperícia , Medicina , Humanos , Responsabilidade Legal , MéxicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are designed to help health professionals provide patients with excellent medical care. The last critical appraisal of CPGs on the treatment of psoriasis evaluated publications up to 2009, but several new guidelines have been published since and their methodological quality remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the quality of CPGs on the treatment of psoriasis published between 2010 and 2020 using the Appraisal Guidelines Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched for relevant CPGs in MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS (Latin American and Caribean Health Sciences Literature) as well as in the gray literature. Two reviewers working independently selected the guidelines for analysis and extracted the relevant data. Each guideline was then assessed using the AGREE II instrument by 5 reviewers, also working independently. RESULTS: Nineteen CPGs met the inclusion criteria and most of them had been produced in high-income countries. The mean (SD) domain scores were 84.9% (14.7%) for scope and purpose, 65.5% (19.3%) for stakeholder involvement, 66.7% (15.6%) for rigor of development, 72.8% (16.8%) for clarity of presentation, 46.6% (21.7%) for applicability, and 57.0% (30.4%) for editorial independence. CONCLUSIONS: Although about three-quarters of the CPGs assessed were judged to be of high quality and over half were recommended for use in clinical practice, standards of guideline development need to be raised to improve CPG quality, particularly in terms of applicability and editorial independence, which had the lowest scores in our evaluation.
Assuntos
Medicina , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Psoríase , Humanos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with severe psoriasis have an increased cardiovascular (CV) risk and prevalence of subclinical coronary artery disease (CAD). Coronary artery calcium (CAC) testing can detect subclinical CAD and improve cardiovascular risk assessment beyond clinical scores. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the presence and magnitude of subclinical CAD determined by CAC score among the different ESC/EAS CV risk categories, as well as the potential for risk reclassification, in patients with severe psoriasis from a low CV risk population. METHODS: Unicentric cross-sectional study in 111 patients with severe chronic plaque psoriasis from a low CV risk population in the Mediterranean region. Patients were classified into four CV risk categories according to the ESC/EAS guideline recommendations and HeartScore/SCORE calibrated charts. Patients underwent coronary computed tomography to determine their CAC scores. Patients in the moderate-risk category with a CAC score of ≥100 were considered to be reclassified as recommended by the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines. Reclassification was also considered for patients in the low-risk category with a CAC score>0. RESULTS: Presence of subclinical CAD was detected in 46 (41.4%) patients. These accounted for 86.2% of patients in high/very-high-risk categories and 25.6% of patients in non-high-risk categories. Fourteen (17.1%) of the patients in non-high-risk categories were reclassifiable due to their CAC score. This percentage was higher (25%) when considering the moderate-risk category alone and lower (13.8%) in the low-risk category. Age was the only variable associated with presence of subclinical CAD and reclassification. CONCLUSIONS: Over 40% of patients with severe psoriasis from a low-risk region and up to 25% of those in non-high-risk categories have subclinical CAD. CAC appears to be useful for reclassification purposes in CV risk assessment of patients with severe psoriasis. Further research is required to elucidate how CAC could be implemented in everyday practice at outpatient dermatology clinics dedicated to severe psoriasis.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Psoríase , Cálcio , Angiografia Coronária , Estudos Transversais , Fatores de Risco de Doenças Cardíacas , Humanos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the role of Family and Community Care Trainig Units as facilitators of the implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) and the factors associated with a greater effort in this task. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Design: Cross-sectional descriptive study with analytical approach. PARTICIPANTS: Training Units in Spain (N=94). MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Variables were collected through a self-completed survey into five domains: characteristics of Training Units, training activity directed at evidence-based clinical practice (EBPP), importance attributed to this activity, responsibility for EBPP implementation, perception of barriers and facilitators to its use. Descriptive and multivariate analysis with the dependent variable being the perceived effort of the training unit to implement CPG. RESULTS: 45 Training Units responded (47.9%). 42.2%(CI 95%: 27.8-56.6) of their coordinators have directed research projects and 31.1% (CI 95%:17.6-44.6) have participated in elaborating CPG. They organized an average of 51hours (SD 47.2) of training in PCBP. 97.7% (CI95%:93.3-100) considered it fundamental that the residents ow and apply PCBP and 93.3% (CI95%:86.0-100) considered that tutors are responsible for the implementation. The participation of the coordinator in CPG (coef: 0.58; IC 95%: 0.00-1.16), awareness of how important is that residents know about CPG (coef: 0.89; IC 95%: 0.24-1.54) and that CPG appear to be widely applicable. applicable (coef: 0.35; IC 95%: -0.01-0.70) were related to a greater effort by the training units. CONCLUSIONS: The training units recognize the importance of CPGs and consider that tutors are responsible for their implementation. Training Units effort to implement CPG was related to unit coordinators previous experience, the perception of applicability and residents needs.
Assuntos
Educação em Saúde , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Espanha , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Even though couple therapy is efficacious, there is no improvement in up to 50% of the couples. Also effect sizes found in effectiveness studies in real-world settings are considerably lower than those found in efficacy studies. There is a need to understand more about couple therapy effectiveness in practice settings and the factors responsible for different outcomes. A German nationwide study on the effectiveness of couple counseling including 554 couples applied the same methodology as two earlier studies in the same field. A remarkable consistency was found over the three independent studies in the burden with individual and relationship distress as well as in the rates of improvement. This supports the insight that the improvements reached through couple therapy in practice settings are only about half of the effect sizes reached in efficacy trials. Additionally this study investigated 64 factors, which were found to be influential for relationship quality and stability in earlier studies, for their impact on outcome. Factors present at initiation and termination of therapy were found, which correlate significantly with outcome and with separation of the couple in the follow-up. These factors could be included in prediction models for improvement and separation of the couple. The implications for the practice of couple therapy and for future research are discussed.
Aunque la terapia de pareja es eficaz, no se producen mejoras en hasta el 50 % de las parejas. Además, los tamaños del efecto hallados en los estudios de eficacia real en entornos del mundo real son considerablemente menores que los hallados en los estudios de eficacia teórica. Existe la necesidad de saber más acerca de la eficacia real de la terapia de pareja en la práctica clínica y de los factores responsables de los diferentes resultados. Un estudio alemán a nivel nacional sobre la eficacia real de la terapia de pareja en el que participaron 554 parejas aplicó la misma metodología que dos estudios anteriores en el mismo ámbito. Se halló una coherencia notable entre los tres estudios independientes en la carga con el distrés individual y relacional, así como en los índices de mejora. Esto respalda la percepción de que las mejoras logradas mediante la terapia de pareja en la práctica clínica es solo aproximadamente la mitad de los tamaños del efecto logrados en ensayos de eficacia teórica. Además, este estudio investigó 64 factores que demostraron ser influyentes para la calidad y la estabilidad de la relación en estudios anteriores, por su efecto en los resultados. Se descubrieron factores presentes en el inicio y el final de la terapia que se correlacionan considerablemente con los resultados y con la separación de la pareja en el seguimiento. Estos factores podrían incluirse en modelos de predicción sobre la mejora y la separación de la pareja. Se debaten las implicancias para la terapia de pareja y para futuras investigaciones.
Assuntos
Aconselhamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia de Casal/estatística & dados numéricos , Prática Profissional/estatística & dados numéricos , Estresse Psicológico/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Regras de Decisão Clínica , Aconselhamento/métodos , Terapia de Casal/métodos , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Relações Interpessoais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks interleukins 12/23, has proven in clinical trials its efficacy in inducing and maintaining clinical remission of Crohn's disease (CD). Its effectiveness and safety in actual clinical practice is less known and may differ from trials. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate its effectiveness and safety in clinical practice (intravenous induction pattern essentially), such as induction and over the long term, in patients with CD refractory to biological treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multicentre retrospective analysis (6 hospitals in Aragón), which includes all patients (N=69) with CD undergoing treatment with ustekinumab (either with intravenous or subcutaneous induction), who had at least 16 weeks of follow-up. The clinical response or remission has been evaluated at weeks 16, 24, 32 and 48 using the Harvey-Bradshaw index. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients have been included, mean age 42 years, 54% men. A percentage of 89.86 (95% CI [0.805, 0.949]) of the patients presented clinical improvement at week 16 (15.95% remission, 73.92% response). In the subsequent follow-up, this response has been maintained. Age (OR 0.95, P=.028) and smoking habits (OR 0.19, P=.027) have been identified by an ordinal regression model as predictors of poor treatment response while the need for biological change due to adverse effect (OR 96, P=.00017) and due to loss of secondary response (OR 7.07, P=.034) have been predictors of good response. No serious adverse effects have been reported that forced them to stop taking ustekinumab. CONCLUSION: Ustekinumab is effective and safe in real clinical practice to achieve induction and maintenance of the response in patients with refractory CD. Tobacco and age have been shown to be predictors of poor response, while the indication for adverse effect to previous biological and for loss of secondary response has been shown to be predictors of good response.
Assuntos
Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Ustekinumab/uso terapêutico , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Substituição de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Indução de Remissão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fumar/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ustekinumab/efeitos adversosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the degree of compliance with the recommendations of the 2009 and 2015 versions of the Spanish guidelines for managing asthma (Guía Española para el Manejo del Asma [GEMA]) and the effect of this compliance on controlling the disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted an observational ambispective study between September 2015 and April 2016 in which 314 primary care physicians and 2864 patients participated. RESULTS: Using retrospective data, we found that 81 of the 314 physicians (25.8%; 95% CI 21.3-30.9) stated that they complied with the GEMA2009 recommendations. At the start of the study, 88 of the 314 physicians (28.0%; 95% CI 23.4-33.2) complied with the GEMA2015 recommendations. Poorly controlled asthma (OR, 0.19; 95% CI 0.13-0.28) and persistent severe asthma at the start of the study (OR, 0.20; 95% CI 0.12-0.34) were negatively associated with having well-controlled asthma by the end of the follow-up. In contrast, compliance with the GEMA2015 recommendations was positively associated with a greater likelihood that the patient would have well-controlled asthma by the end of the follow-up (OR, 1.70; 95% CI 1.40-2.06). CONCLUSIONS: Low compliance with the clinical guidelines for managing asthma is a common problem among primary care physicians. Compliance with these guidelines is associated with better asthma control. Actions need to be taken to improve primary care physician compliance with the asthma management guidelines.
RESUMO
AIM: To develop consensus recommendations about good clinical practice rules for caring end-of-life patients. METHODS: A steering committee of 12 Spanish and Portuguese experts proposed 37 recommendations. A two rounds Delphi method was performed, with participation of 105 panelists including internists, other clinicians, nurses, patients, lawyers, bioethicians, health managers, politicians and journalists. We sent a questionnaire with 5 Likert-type answers for each recommendation. Strong consensus was defined when > 95% answers were completely agree or > 90% were agree or completely agree; and weak consensus when > 90% answers were completely agree or > 80% were agree or completely agree. RESULTS: The panel addressed 7 specific areas for 37 recommendations spanning: identification of patients; knowledge of the disease, values and preferences of the patient; information; patient's needs; support and care; palliative sedation, and after death care. CONCLUSIONS: The panel formulated and provided the rationale for recommendations on good clinical practice rules for caring end-of-life patients.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic disease of the digestive tract and up to 20-30% of UC patients may suffer a severe flare-up during the course of the disease. Although there are national and international recommendations about its clinical management, there is not enough information about the treatment of acute severe UC in clinical practice. METHODS: An electronic and anonymous survey with 51 multiple-choice questions was performed among all the members of the Spanish Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Working Group (GETECCU). RESULTS: Out of the 164 responders (20%), most were gastroenterologists (95%), with 59% from tertiary hospitals treating a median of 5 patients per year (IQR: 3-8) with a severe flare-up of ulcerative colitis. An endoscopic examination was routinely performed in 86% of patients (62% at admission). The most commonly used corticosteroid was methylprednisolone, usually at a dose of 60mg/day, and its response was assessed after a median of 3days (IQR: 3-5). Both in thiopurine-naïve and thiopurine-refractory patients, infliximab was the drug most frequently prescribed as rescue therapy. Half of responders (55%) had ever prescribed a first dose of infliximab higher than 5 mg/kg, and a higher proportion (73%) had ever prescribed an earlier dose of infliximab in the second or third infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Acute severe UC is generally managed according to current treatment guidelines in our setting. The rescue therapy most commonly prescribed is infliximab, and the use of intensified or accelerated regimens with this biological drug is not unusual.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa/terapia , Padrões de Prática Médica , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , EspanhaRESUMO
Alcohol-related liver disease (ARLD) is the most prevalent cause of advanced liver disease and liver cirrhosis in Europe, including Spain. According to the World Health Organization the fraction of liver cirrhosis attributable to alcohol use in Spain is 73.8% among men and 56.3% among women. ARLD includes various stages such as steatohepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer. In addition, patients with underlying ARLD and heavy alcohol intake may develop alcoholic hepatitis, which is associated with high mortality. To date, the only effective treatment to treat ARLD is prolonged withdrawal. There are no specific treatments, and the only treatment that increases life expectancy in alcoholic hepatitis is prednisolone. For patients with alcoholic hepatitis who do not respond to treatment, some centres offer the possibility of an early transplant. These clinical practice guidelines aim to propose recommendations on ARLD taking into account their relevance as a cause of advanced chronic liver disease and liver cirrhosis in our setting. This paper aims to answer the key questions for the clinical practice of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, as well as Internal Medicine and Primary Health Centres, making the most up-to-date information regarding the management and treatment of ARLD available to health professionals. These guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the clinical management of this disease.
Assuntos
Hepatopatias Alcoólicas/diagnóstico , Hepatopatias Alcoólicas/terapia , Algoritmos , Humanos , Hepatopatias Alcoólicas/etiologiaRESUMO
Vedolizumab is an anti-integrin monoclonal antibody indicated for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis who have failed conventional or anti-TNF therapies. The objective of this article is to answer a series of very practical questions regarding the management of both diseases with vedolizumab, based on data from published literature, as well as on the experience acquired by the authors in clinical practice in recent years.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Congenital syphilis continues to be a public health problem in Mexico. OBJECTIVE: To assess the similarities and differences between national standards, guidelines and international documents related to the detection of syphilis in pregnant women and congenital syphilis. METHOD: Two algorithms were developed based on the standard of female care during pregnancy and on the standard for prevention and control of sexually transmitted infections. Based on the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines, algorithms were developed for syphilis during pregnancy, syphilis in the newborn and sexual contacts. RESULTS: The standard for pregnancy mentions that syphilis testing should be carried out in every pregnant woman on her first contact or at delivery, without diagnostic tests being specified. The Official Mexican Standard (NOM) on sexually transmitted infections mentions the traditional algorithm for syphilis detection, treatment follow-up, coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus and congenital syphilis criteria. The CDC recommend reverse algorithm, antibody titer, treatment and follow-up as part of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The elimination of mother-to-child transmission of syphilis requires NOMs updating and homogenizing, as well as the study of stillbirths and neonates born to mothers with syphilis.
INTRODUCCIÓN: La sífilis congénita continúa siendo un problema de salud pública en México. OBJETIVO: Evaluar las similitudes y diferencias entre normas nacionales, guías y documentos internacionales relacionados con la detección de sífilis en embarazadas y sífilis congénita. MÉTODO: Se elaboraron dos algoritmos basados en las normas sobre atención de la mujer durante el embarazo y sobre prevención y control de infecciones de transmisión sexual. A partir de la guía de Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) se realizaron algoritmos sobre sífilis durante el embarazo, sífilis en recién nacido y contactos sexuales. RESULTADOS: La norma sobre embarazo menciona que la prueba de sífilis debe efectuarse a toda mujer embarazada en su primer contacto o durante el parto, sin especificar pruebas diagnósticas. La norma oficial mexicana (NOM) sobre infecciones de transmisión sexual menciona el algoritmo tradicional para detección de sífilis, seguimiento al tratamiento, coinfección con virus de inmunodeficiencia humana y criterios de sífilis congénita. CDC recomienda algoritmo reverso, título de anticuerpos, tratamiento y seguimiento como parte del diagnóstico. CONCLUSIONES: La eliminación de la transmisión maternoinfantil de sífilis requiere actualizar y homogeneizar las NOM, así como el estudio de mortinatos y de recién nacidos de madres con sífilis.
Assuntos
Algoritmos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Sorodiagnóstico da Sífilis , Sífilis Congênita/diagnóstico , Feminino , Regulamentação Governamental , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/prevenção & controle , México , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Sífilis Congênita/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is a disease caused by an immune response to food antigens in contact with the oesophageal mucosa. Its diagnosis is defined by the combination of oesophageal dysfunction symptoms and inflammation of the oesophageal mucosa predominantly by eosinophils. Its chronic course and frequent progression to subepithelial fibrosis and oesophageal strictures indicate the need for treatment. The information provided by recent clinical trials and systematic reviews has led to the development of new clinical guidelines, endorsed by several European scientific societies. This review includes the most relevant aspects of the new guidelines, updates the EoE concept and reports its epidemiology and risk factors, associated conditions and its natural history in children and adults. Diagnostic criteria are provided, and tests for EoE diagnosis and monitoring and therapeutic options are analysed based on the best scientific evidence and consensus opinion of experts.
Assuntos
Esofagite Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Esofagite Eosinofílica/terapia , Algoritmos , HumanosRESUMO
This document updates the recommendations made by the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine and the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology for the diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). In order to evaluate the quality of the evidence and determine the recommendation levels of the interventions, we used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. This document establishes optimal delay intervals based on symptoms and the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and recommends reducing the barriers for diagnostic confirmation in symptomatic subjects. With regard to CRC screening in the average-risk population, we propose strategies to achieve the universal implementation of organised CRC screening programmes based on biennial FIT and to increase the participation of the target population, including the involvement of Primary Healthcare. This Clinical Practice Guideline recommends universal screening for Lynch syndrome with mismatch repair proteins immunohistochemistry or microsatellite instability in incident CRCs and the use of gene panels in patients with adenomatous polyposis. It also updates the strategies to reduce the incidence and mortality of both CRC and other tumours associated with hereditary syndromes. Regarding non-hereditary familial CRC and surveillance after resection of adenomas, serrated lesions or CRC, we established the recommendations based on the attributable risk and the risk reduction of the proposed intervention. Finally, the document includes recommendations regarding surveillance intervals in inflammatory bowel disease and the attitude towards dysplasia.