Presepsin as a prognostic biomarker in COVID-19 patients: combining clinical scoring systems and laboratory inflammatory markers for outcome prediction.

BACKGROUND: There is still limited research on the prognostic value of Presepsin as a biomarker for predicting the outcome of COVID-19 patients. Additionally, research on the combined predictive value of Presepsin with clinical scoring systems and inflammation markers for disease prognosis is lacking. METHODS: A total of 226 COVID-19 patients admitted to Beijing Youan Hospital's emergency department from May to November 2022 were screened. Demographic information, laboratory measurements, and blood samples for Presepsin levels were collected upon admission. The predictive value of Presepsin, clinical scoring systems, and inflammation markers for 28-day mortality was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients were analyzed, 83 (43.7%) were mild, 61 (32.1%) were moderate, and 46 (24.2%) were severe/critically ill. 23 (12.1%) patients died within 28 days. The Presepsin levels in severe/critical patients were significantly higher compared to moderate and mild patients (p < 0.001). Presepsin showed significant predictive value for 28-day mortality in COVID-19 patients, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.828 (95% CI: 0.737-0.920). Clinical scoring systems and inflammation markers also played a significant role in predicting 28-day outcomes. After Cox regression adjustment, Presepsin, qSOFA, NEWS2, PSI, CURB-65, CRP, NLR, CAR, and LCR were identified as independent predictors of 28-day mortality in COVID-19 patients (all p-values < 0.05). Combining Presepsin with clinical scoring systems and inflammation markers further enhanced the predictive value for patient prognosis. CONCLUSION: Presepsin is a favorable indicator for the prognosis of COVID-19 patients, and its combination with clinical scoring systems and inflammation markers improved prognostic assessment.

Effect of temperature on presepsin pre-analytical stability in biological fluids of preterm and term newborns.

OBJECTIVES: Thermostability is one of the pre-requisites for the reliability of analytes in clinical practice and biomedical research. Although presepsin represents a promising new biomarker for the early diagnosis of sepsis in newborns, data on its stability under different storage conditions are lacking. We aimed to investigate presepsin thermostability in blood, urine and saliva samples after thawing at 4 predetermined monitoring time-points in a cohort of preterm and term infants. METHODS: We conducted an observational study, where each case served as its own control, in 24 preterm and term infants. Blood, urine and saliva samples were stored at -80 °C for 18 months, and presepsin measured in different biological fluids at thawing (T0), 24 (T1), 48 (T2) and at 72 (T3) hours after thawing. RESULTS: No significant differences (p>0.05, for all) in presepsin levels were observed at T0-T3 in the different biological fluids. Furthermore, no differences at T0-T3 were observed in presepsin levels between blood and saliva fluids, whilst urine levels were significantly higher (p<0.05, for all) than blood and saliva at T0-T3. CONCLUSIONS: Results on presepsin pre-analytical thermo-stability in different biological fluids after long-term refrigeration support the reliability of this biomarker in the diagnosis and monitoring of perinatal sepsis.

Fetal chronic hypoxia does not affect urinary presepsin levels in newborns at birth.

OBJECTIVES: Early sepsis detection and diagnosis still constitutes an open issue since the accuracy of standard-of care parameters is biased by a series of perinatal factors including hypoxia. Therefore, we aimed at investigating the effect of fetal chronic hypoxia insult on urine levels of a promising new marker of sepsis, namely presepsin (P-SEP). METHODS: We conducted a prospective case-control study in 22 cases of early-intrauterine growth restriction (E-IUGR) compared with 22 small-for-gestational-age (SGA) newborns and 66 healthy controls. P-SEP urine samples were collected over the first 72 h from birth. Blood culture and C-reactive protein (CRP) blood levels were measured in E-IUGR and SGA infants. Perinatal standard monitoring parameters and main outcomes were also recorded. RESULTS: No significant urinary P-SEP differences (p>0.05, for all) were observed among studied groups. Moreover, no significant correlations (p>0.05, for both) between urinary P-SEP and blood CRP levels in both E-IUGR and SGA groups (R=0.08; R=0.07, respectively) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The present results showing the lack of influence of fetal chronic hypoxia on urinary P-SEP levels offer additional data to hypothesize the possible use of urinary P-SEP measurement in neonates in daily clinical practice. Further multicenter prospective data are needed, including infants with early-onset sepsis.

Kinetics of Different Blood Biomarkers during Polymyxin-B Extracorporeal Hemoperfusion in Abdominal Sepsis.

INTRODUCTION: Comparison of the marker kinetics procalcitonin, presepsin, and endotoxin during extracorporeal hemoperfusion with polymyxin-B adsorbing cartridge (PMX-HA) has never been described in abdominal sepsis. We aimed to compare the trend of three biomarkers in septic post-surgical abdominal patients in intensive care unit (ICU) treated with PMX-HA and their prognostic value. METHODS: Ninety abdominal post-surgical patients were enrolled into different groups according to the evidence of postoperative sepsis or not. Non-septic patients admitted in the surgical ward were included in C group (control group). ICU septic shock patients with endotoxin levels <0.6 EAA receiving conventional therapy were addressed in S group and those with endotoxin levels ≥0.6 EAA receiving treatment with PMX-HA, besides conventional therapy, were included in SPB group. Presepsin, procalcitonin, endotoxin and other clinical data were recorded at 24 h (T0), 72 h (T1) and 7 days (T2) after surgery. Clinical follow-up was performed on day 30. RESULTS: SPB group showed reduced levels of the three biomarkers on T2 versus T0 (p < 0.001); presepsin, procalcitonin and endotoxin levels decreased, respectively, by 25%, 11%, and 2% on T1 versus T0, and 40%, 41%, and 26% on T2 versus T0. All patients in C group, 73% of patients in SPB group versus 37% of patients in S group survived at follow-up. Moreover, procalcitonin had the highest predictive value for mortality at 30 days, followed by presepsin. CONCLUSION: The present study showed the reliability of presepsin in monitoring PMX-HA treatment in septic shock patients. Procalcitonin showed better predicting power for the mortality riSsk.

Perinatal asphyxia does not influence presepsin levels in neonates: A prospective study.

AIM: To compare Presepsin (presepsin) levels in plasma and urine of uninfected newborn infants with perinatal asphyxia with those of controls. METHODS: In this prospective study, we enrolled 25 uninfected full-term infants with perinatal asphyxia and 19 controls. We measured presepsin levels in whole blood or urine. In neonates with perinatal asphyxia, we compared presepsin levels in blood and urine at four time points. RESULTS: In neonates with perinatal asphyxia, blood and urinary presepsin levels matched each other at any time point. At admission, the median presepsin value in blood was similar in both groups (p = 0.74), while urinary levels were higher in hypoxic neonates (p = 0.05). Perinatal asphyxia seemed to increase serum CRP and procalcitonin levels beyond normal cut-off but not those of presepsin. CONCLUSION: In uninfected neonates with perinatal asphyxia, median blood and urinary presepsin levels matched each other at any point in the first 72 h of life and seemed to be slightly affected by the transient renal impairment associated with perinatal hypoxia in the first 12 h of life. Perinatal asphyxia did not influence presepsin levels within the first 72 h of life, while those of CRP and procalcitonin increased.

Advances of presepsin in sepsis-associated ARDS.

This article reviews the correlation between presepsin and sepsis and the resulting acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ARDS is a severe complication of sepsis. Despite the successful application of protective mechanical ventilation, restrictive fluid therapy, and neuromuscular blockade, which have effectively reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with ARDS, the mortality rate among patients with sepsis-associated ARDS remains notably high. The challenge lies in the prediction of ARDS onset and the timely implementation of intervention strategies. Recent studies have demonstrated significant variations in presepsin (PSEP) levels between patients with sepsis and those without, particularly in the context of ARDS. Moreover, these studies have revealed substantially elevated PSEP levels in patients with sepsis-associated ARDS compared to those with nonsepsis-associated ARDS. Consequently, PSEP emerges as a valuable biomarker for identifying patients with an increased risk of sepsis-associated ARDS and to predict in-hospital mortality.

[Prospective analysis of inflammatory markers and perioperative clinical data in children with craniosynostosis undergoing reconstructive surgery]. / Prospektivnyi analiz dinamiki laboratornykh markerov vospaleniya i klinicheskoi kartiny perioperatsionnogo perioda pri rekonstruktivnykh operatsiyakh u detei s kraniosinostozami.

BACKGROUND: Craniosynostosis (CS) is a group of skull malformations manifested by congenital absence or premature closure of cranial sutures. Reconstructive surgery in the second half of life is traditional approach for CS. The issues of surgical stress response after reconstructive surgery for CS in children are still unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical and laboratory parameters in children undergoing traumatic reconstructive surgery for CS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria were CS, reconstructive surgery, age <24 months, no comorbidities and available laboratory diagnostic protocol including complete blood count, biochemical blood test with analysis of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, ferritin and presepsin. The study included 32 patients (24 (75%) boys and 8 (25%) girls) aged 10.29±4.99 months after surgery between October 2021 and June 2022. Non-syndromic and syndromic forms of CS were observed in 25 (78.1%) and 7 (21.9%) cases, respectively. RESULTS: There were no infectious complications. We analyzed postoperative clinical data, fever, clinical and biochemical markers of inflammation. CONCLUSION: Early postoperative period after reconstructive surgery for CS in children is accompanied by significant increase of inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, ferritin). However, these findings do not indicate infectious complications. This is a manifestation of nonspecific systemic reaction. Severity of systemic inflammatory response syndrome with increase in acute phase proteins indicates highly traumatic reconstructive surgery for CS in children. Analysis of serum presepsin allows for differential diagnosis between infectious complication and uncomplicated course of early postoperative period.

The value of plasma presepsin as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for sepsis in Southern China.

BACKGROUND: Presepsin is a soluble CD14 subtype that has been considered as a novel marker for patients with sepsis. This study explored the clinical value of presepsin for sepsis in Southern China, and further established models for diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis through using machine learning (ML), by combining presepsin and other laboratory parameters. METHODS: 269 subjects (105 infected patients, 164 sepsis and septic shock) and 198 healthy controls were enrolled. Laboratory parameters (hematological parameters, coagulation parameters, liver function indices, renal function indices, and inflammatory markers) were collected. Plasma presepsin was tested by chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay. ML of DxAI™ Research platform was used to establish diagnostic and prognostic models. Sensitivity, specificity, and other performance indicators were used to evaluate the performance of each model. RESULTS: The level of presepsin was obviously increased in sepsis and sepsis shock, compared with that of infected and healthy group (all P < 0.0001). Presepsin concentration was positively correlated with positive blood culture and 30-day mortality in sepsis and septic shock patients. Through ROC curve analysis, Hb, UREA, APTT, CRP, PCT, and presepsin were incorporated into machine learning to construct diagnosis models. Ada Boost model had the best diagnostic efficiency (AUC: 0.94 (95% CI 0.919-0.968) in the training set and AUC: 0.86 (95% CI 0.813-0.900) in validation set). Furthermore, AST, APTT, UREA, PCT, and presepsin were included in the prognosis ML models, and the Bernoulli NB model had greater predictive ability for 30-day mortality risk of sepsis (AUC: 0.706), which was higher than that of PCT (AUC: 0.617) and presepsin (AUC: 0.634) alone. CONCLUSION: Machine-learning model based on presepsin and routinely laboratory parameters showed good performance of diagnostic and prognostic ability for sepsis patients.

Specificity of Presepsin as a Biomarker of Bacterial Infection in Mouse Sepsis Models.

INTRODUCTION: Since its discovery in 2002, presepsin (P-SEP) has been reported to be useful in the early diagnosis of sepsis and has been evaluated in many clinical studies. However, as antibodies that bind to mouse P-SEP were previously unavailable, serum P-SEP levels in mice are limited. This study used a P-SEP enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit to evaluate the changes in serum P-SEP levels in mouse sepsis models compared with changes in other inflammatory markers and determine whether P-SEP can function as a biomarker specific to bacterial infections. METHODS: Sepsis was induced in mice via cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), induction with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and cecal ligation (CL) model was created as a control for the CLP model, following which clinical biomarkers (P-SEP, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin) were evaluated. RESULTS: The 48-h survival rates in the CLP, CL, and LPS-induced sepsis models were 67%, 89%, and 57%, respectively. Serum C-reactive protein levels did not increase in the CLP and CL models within 24 h but significantly increased in the LPS-induced sepsis model. Serum procalcitonin levels increased in the CLP and CL models and especially increased in the LPS-induced sepsis model. In contrast, an increase in serum P-SEP level was found in the CLP model at 6 h compared with those at baseline, the CL, and LPS-induced sepsis models. CONCLUSIONS: Mouse P-SEP is elevated early in infection and more specific to bacterial infection compared with other biomarkers.

Utility of urinary presepsin in the diagnosis of pyelonephritis: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Presepsin is produced during the phagocytosis of bacteria by granulocytes. Presepsin increases at the site of infection; however, the significance of urinary presepsin in pyelonephritis is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate whether measuring urinary presepsin can distinguish between pyelonephritis and nonpyelonephritis. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of patients with suspected pyelonephritis was conducted. Urinary presepsin at admission was compared between the pyelonephritis and nonpyelonephritis groups using the Mann-Whitney test. The predictive accuracy of urinary presepsin for diagnosing pyelonephritis was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis curve. RESULTS: A total of 35 eligible participants were included in the pyelonephritis group and 25 in the nonpyelonephritis group. The median urinary presepsin level was 2232.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 1029.0-3907.0) pg/mL in the pyelonephritis group and 1348.0 (IQR, 614.5-2304.8) pg/mL in the nonpyelonephritis group. Urinary presepsin concentrations were significantly higher in the pyelonephritis group than in the nonpyelonephritis group (P = 0.023). ROC analysis of urinary presepsin revealed a cutoff value of 3650 pg/mL to distinguish between the pyelonephritis and nonpyelonephritis groups. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio for the diagnosis of pyelonephritis were 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.58), 0.96 (95% CI, 0.79-1.00), 0.93 (95% CI, 0.68-1.00), 0.52 (95% CI, 0.37-0.68), 9.60 (95% CI, 1.35-68.23), and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.47-0.83), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of urinary presepsin is useful in differentiating pyelonephritis from other diseases.

Comparison of presepsin and Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin in the diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The early diagnosis of sepsis is hampered by the lack of reliable laboratory measures. There is growing evidence that presepsin and Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) are promising biomarkers in the diagnosis of sepsis. This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the diagnostic value of MR-proADM and presepsin in sepsis patients. METHODS: We searched Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, China national knowledge infrastructure, and Wanfang up to 22th July, 2022, for studies evaluating the diagnosis performance of presepsin and MR-proADM in adult sepsis patients. Risk of bias was assessed using quadas-2. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using bivariate meta-analysis. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were used to find source of heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 40 studies were eventually selected for inclusion in this meta-analysis, including 33 for presepsin and seven for MR-proADM. Presepsin had a sensitivity of 0.86 (0.82-0.90), a specificity of 0.79 (0.71-0.85), and an AUC of 0.90 (0.87-0.92). The sensitivity of MR-proADM was 0.84 (0.78-0.88), specificity was 0.86 (0.79-0.91), and AUC was 0.91 (0.88-0.93). The profile of control group, population, and standard reference may be potential sources of heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrated that presepsin and MR-proADM exhibited high accuracy (AUC ≥ 0.90) in the diagnosis of sepsis in adults, with MR-proADM showing significantly higher accuracy than presepsin.

Removal characteristics of presepsin by operating conditions and hemofilter.

Presepsin, which is used as a biomarker for sepsis, is thought to be removed by dialysis, but the actual removal properties of dialysis are unknown. We investigated the presepsin removal properties of continuous hemodiafiltration using the high concentration of presepsin from human plasma drained by plasma exchange. Each solution in plasma exchange was connected to a continuous hemodiafiltration blood circuit and circulated at 4 conditions. The results show that presepsin was confirmed to be removed more efficiently in hemofiltration than in hemodialysis. In addition, when using a polymethylmethacrylate hemofilter for continuous hemodiafiltration, the lowest presepsin concentration is on the filtrate side, suggesting that the main removal mechanism is adsorption. Since presepsin has a molecular weight of 13,000, its removal efficiency is high by hemofiltration as per principle. In addition, since the main adsorption principle of polymethylmethacrylate hemofilter is hydrophobic bond, presepsin is considered to be adsorbed. Since presepsin is metabolized in the kidney, it is elevated in renal failure. In this paper, we confirmed that presepsin is eliminated by continuous hemodiafiltration not only in the kidney. Depending on the timing of presepsin measurement, there is a risk of missing the diagnosis of sepsis. Kidney function and continuous hemodiafiltration should be checked when measuring presepsin.

Differential diagnosis of increased Erythrocyte Sedimentation rate.

The paper is aimed at differential diagnosis of increased sedimentation rate (ESR) from the point of internal medicine. After the interpretation of the term we describe the technique of the examination and possible errors in pre-analytical as well as analytical phase. The paper includes ranges for conventional FW assessment (analysis of ESR based on Fahraeus-Westergren) and the characteristics of newer methods. We list the overview of the most common causes that affect faster or slower ESR. The stress is put on the assessment of the causes of increased ESR and its persistence from the perspective of clinical practice, we also describe diseases with slower ESR. Attention is drawn to the comparison of the results of the most common acute phase reactants, especially to discordant results of ESR, CRP and procalcitonin in the serum, and to the contribution of the analysis of ESR and CRP in selected diseases. The final part is aimed at the correct diagnostic approach when assessing increased ESR of unknown etiology, underlining the significance of the patient´s history, physical examination and the position of basic as well as complementary laboratory methods and examinations including imaging techniques.

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Presepsin and Procalcitonin for Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.

Objective: Early diagnosis of sepsis is crucial to institute appropriate therapy and then to avert a possible negative outcome. We planned this study to evaluate the diagnostic value of presepsin, its sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing sepsis in critically ill patients, and its ability to prognosticate the outcome of sepsis. Methods: In this prospective observational study, adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at our institute were screened, and those with features suggestive of sepsis were recruited into the study. Procalcitonin (PCT) and presepsin were assessed on the day of admission and day 7 of the ICU stay, apart from routine investigations. Patients were followed for outcome in terms of mortality till 28 days. Results: The study comprised 82 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria. Presepsin sensitivity for sepsis diagnosis was determined to be 78%, while that of PCT was determined to be 69%. This gave a combined sensitivity of presepsin and PCT of 93% when used in parallel for the diagnosis of sepsis. Conclusion: A combination of PCT and presepsin provides higher sensitivity and can be used to screen for sepsis in the ICU. How to cite this article: Roy S, Kothari N, Sharma A, Goyal S, Sankanagoudar S, Bhatia PK, et al. Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Presepsin and Procalcitonin for Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(4):289-293.

Presepsin as a diagnostic biomarker of peri-prosthetic joint infection: a review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: While presepsin has shown promise as a sepsis biomarker, it has only recently been considered in the field of orthopedic surgery. Therefore, the present review evaluates the role of presepsin in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) as well as its diagnostic and prognostic value in diagnosing PJI. METHODS: Utilizing 4 online databases, we thoroughly searched the literature for articles evaluating the role of presepsin in TJA as well as its prognostic and diagnostic value for PJI. RESULTS: Studies evaluating perioperative presepsin trends in primary TJA demonstrated that its natural course is similar to C-Reactive Protein (CRP). The area under (AUC) the receiver operating characteristic curves values for serum presepsin ranged from 0.86 to 0.926. These values were higher than the AUCs for CRP in each of their respective studies. However, synovial presepsin demonstrated a lower AUC (0.41). Prognostically, presepsin demonstrated potential in terms of infection monitoring following revision TJA for PJI. CONCLUSION: Although the data remains limited, presepsin may serve as a potential biomarker to evaluate the natural inflammatory response following TJA as well as to help diagnose PJI. The present review serves to set the foundation for future study into serum presepsin in larger patient cohorts. Further study is needed to evaluate how this biomarker compares to other laboratory values traditionally used for PJI diagnosis.

Comparison between presepsin, procalcitonin, and CRP as biomarkers to diagnose sepsis in critically ill patients.

Background and Aims: Mortality associated with sepsis continues to remain high. Early diagnosis and aggressive management may improve outcomes. Biomarkers may help in early diagnosis, but the search for an ideal biomarker continues. Presepsin has been introduced as a new biomarker, however, it still needs validation before its use becomes routine. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of various biomarkers in patients with suspected sepsis. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 100 patients with suspected infection, admitted in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) was conducted. Diagnosis of sepsis was made on the basis of the current surviving sepsis guidelines criteria. Results: Out of 100 patients, 70 were diagnosed to have sepsis, and overall ICU mortality was 22%. Overall, C-reactive protein (CRP) was positive in 98, procalcitonin in 75, and presepsin in 64 patients. For diagnosis of sepsis the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC, respectively, for CRP was 98.6%, 3.3%, and 0.725. For procalcitonin (>0.5 ng/ml) it was 87.1%, 53.3%, and 0.776, and for procalcitonin (>1 ng/ml) 70%, 70%, and 0.816, respectively. For presepsin sensitivity, specificity, and AUC, respectively, for diagnosis of sepsis was 77.1%, 66.7%, and 0.734. For ICU mortality, sensitivity and specificity for CRP was 95.5% and 1.3%, for procalcitonin (>0.5) 72.7% and 24.4.%, for procalcitonin (>1) 59.1% and 42.3%, and for presepsin 61.5% and 27.3%, respectively. Conclusion: Inflammatory markers may be raised in a large proportion of ICU patients, even in those without sepsis. Procalcitnonin and presepsin had similar efficacy in diagnosing sepsis. However, none of the three biomarkers studied were accurate in predicting ICU mortality.

Characterizing the kinetics of presepsin and associated inflammatory biomarkers in human endotoxemia.

In this study, we describe the kinetics of a new potential inflammatory biomarker, presepsin, together with a panel of well-established biomarkers in a human endotoxemia study. We evaluated biomarker correlations and identified combinations that could hold valuable insights regarding the state of infection.

Predictive Role of Changes in Presepsin and Early Sepsis in ICU Patients After Abdominal Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: It is difficult to identify early sepsis after surgery due to postoperative inflammatory reactions. Presepsin, a glycoprotein expressed on the surface of innate immune cells, is produced during bacterial phagocytosis, and its level increases in the bloodstream of sepsis patients. We aimed to measure the differences between the diagnostic ability of presepsin and other biomarkers to identify postoperative sepsis and septic shock in acute period after major abdominal surgery. METHODS: From March 2020 to March 2021, patients who underwent surgery due to intra-abdominal infection were enrolled. Level of presepsin and procalcitonin, and white blood cell counts were prospectively measured every morning for 3 d from intensive care unit admission after surgery (from T0 to T3). Diagnostic values of inflammatory markers were compared to predict early development of sepsis or septic shock within 7 d after surgery. Cut-off value of significant risk factor associated with postoperative sepsis or septic shock were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 298 patients, postoperative sepsis and septic shock occurred in 91 and 38 patients, respectively. For prediction of early postoperative sepsis or septic shock, presepsin and procalcitonin had comparable diagnostic abilities. In multivariate analysis, presepsin > 406.5 pg/mL at T0 (Odds Ratio [OR]:4.055, P = 0.047), presepsin > 1216 pg/mL at T2 (OR:40.030, P = 0.005) and procalcitonin > 1.685 ng/mL at T2 (OR: 5.229, P = 0.008) were significant factors for predicting the occurrence of early postoperative septic shock. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic accuracy of presepsin for sepsis or septic shock was feasible in acute postoperative period. It would be useful to monitor newly developed sepsis from normal inflammatory response, especially in patients who underwent surgical operation for the elimination of intra-abdominal infection.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of presepsin and procalcitonin in non-infectious organ failure, sepsis, and septic shock: a prospective observational study according to the Sepsis-3 definitions.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the diagnostic and prognostic value of presepsin among patients with organ failure, including sepsis, in accordance with the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). METHODS: This prospective observational study included 420 patients divided into three groups: non-infectious organ failure (n = 142), sepsis (n = 141), and septic shock (n = 137). Optimal cut-off values of presepsin to discriminate between the three groups were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We determined the optimal cut-off value of presepsin levels to predict mortality associated with sepsis and performed Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis according to the cut-off value. Cox proportional hazards model was performed to determine the risk factors for 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Presepsin levels were significantly higher in sepsis than in non-infectious organ failure cases (p < 0.001) and significantly higher in patients with septic shock than in those with sepsis (p = 0.002). The optimal cut-off value of the presepsin level to discriminate between sepsis and non-infectious organ failure was 582 pg/mL (p < 0.001) and between sepsis and septic shock was 1285 pg/mL (p < 0.001). The optimal cut-off value of the presepsin level for predicting the 30-day mortality was 821 pg/mL (p = 0.005) for patients with sepsis. Patients with higher presepsin levels (≥ 821 pg/mL) had significantly higher mortality rates than those with lower presepsin levels (< 821 pg/mL) (log-rank test; p = 0.004). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, presepsin could predict the 30-day mortality in sepsis cases (hazard ratio, 1.003; 95% confidence interval 1.001-1.005; p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Presepsin levels could effectively differentiate sepsis from non-infectious organ failure and could help clinicians identify patients with sepsis with poor prognosis. Presepsin was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality among patients with sepsis and septic shock.

Perinatal presepsin assessment: a new sepsis diagnostic tool?

Perinatal sepsis constitutes a medical emergency and is still one of the major causes of mortality and morbidity. The possibility of an early diagnosis of sepsis is still debated and controversial. In particular, clinical symptoms can be hidden by the association of sepsis with other perinatal diseases and/or by therapeutic strategies performed. In this context, there is evidence that the accuracy of standard of care diagnostic parameters (i.e. blood culture, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin) can be biased by additional confounding factors (gestational age, birth-weight, acute-chronic hypoxia). Therefore, the inclusion in clinical daily practice of new biomarkers of sepsis is of utmost importance. Of a panel of biomarkers, Presepsin (P-SEP) plays an important role in the development and response of the immune system and as an early marker of sepsis both in adult and pediatric patients. Therefore, in the present review we aim to offer an overview of the role of P-SEP in the early detection of perinatal sepsis as a trustworthy marker according to actual statements of official international institutions. Future perspectives regard the possibility of a longitudinal non-invasive biological fluids P-SEP assessment thus limiting the sample stress in high risk newborns.