Reducing diarrhoea in an adult surgical intensive care unit: A quality improvement study.

BACKGROUND: Although diarrhoea is a real source of morbidity for critically ill patients, this issue has been little studied, making it difficult to understand its mechanisms and management. AIMS: We conducted a quality improvement study in an adult surgical intensive care unit before/after the implementation of a specific protocol to firstly improve diarrhoea management for patient benefit and secondly to understand the impact on caregivers. STUDY DESIGN: The first part of this before/after study consisted in assessing the proportion of patients receiving an anti-diarrheal treatment before (phase I)/after (phase II) the implementation of the protocol. The second part of the study was to survey the caregivers on this topic. RESULTS: Sixty four adults were included (33 in phase I; 31 in phase II) with 280 diarrheal episodes (129 in phase I; 151 in phase II). The proportion of patients who received at least one anti-diarrheal treatment was similar between the two phases (79% (26/33) vs. 68% (21/31), p = .40). Diarrhoea incidence was also similar (9% (33 patients/368 admissions) vs. 11% (31 patients/275 admissions), p = .35). The delay to initiate at least one treatment was significantly shorter in phase II (2 days [1-7] vs. 0 day [0-2]; p < .001). The patients' rehabilitation was no longer impacted by the occurrence of a diarrheal episode in phase II (39% (13/33) vs. 0% (0/31), p < .001). Eighty team members completed the surveys in phase I and 70 in phase II. Caregivers perceived diarrhoea like a burden and its economic impact remained high. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a protocol for the management of ICU diarrhoea did not increase the proportion of patients treated, but it did significantly improve the delay to initiate a treatment. The patients' rehabilitation was no longer affected by diarrhoea. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The use of specific anti-diarrhoea guidelines may help to reduce the burden of diarrhoea in an ICU.

The effects of simulation-based education on initial neonatal evaluation and care skills.

OBJECTIVE: Neonatal evaluations performed at the very first minutes following postpartum are the most important steps in deciding for neonatal resuscitation. Therefore, the newborn initial care and evaluation notion and skills of midwives in the delivery hall are quite important. The study was planned to determine the effects of simulation education on newborn evaluation and care skills in midwifery students. METHODS: This is a quasi-experimental study. The population of the study was composed of the 4th year students of Marmara University Faculty of Health Sciences (65 students in total), who selected the Intern Newborn course in the 2017-2018 Fall and Spring semesters. RESULTS: The areas where the control group students did not apply at all or needed the help of the trainer were observed as delivery room preparation (86.2%), initial neonatal evaluation (96.6%) and registration/safety (69%). According to "the Guide for Newborn Evaluation at the Delivery Room," the differences in the mean total scores and all sub-dimension scores were found to be significant in favor of the experiment group. CONCLUSION: Education programs that are carried out by computer-assisted simulation and in accordance with the teaching guide were effective on improvement of knowledge-skills on newborns' first evaluations in the delivery room.

Practical Suggestions on How to Move From Peer Review to Peer Learning.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to outline practical steps that a department can take to transition to a peer learning model. CONCLUSION: The 2015 Institute of Medicine report on improving diagnosis emphasized that organizations and industries that embrace error as an opportunity to learn tend to outperform those that do not. To meet this charge, radiology must transition from a peer review to a peer learning approach.

[Review and analysis of the evidence on the role and the impact of pharmacists' activities: Development of an online tool]. / Recensement et analyse des preuves sur le rôle et sur les retombées de l'activité pharmaceutique : développement d'un outil sur Internet.

BACKGROUND: Considering the increase in healthcare expenses, stakeholders need to make choices, including healthcare program funding, and professional activities to prioritise. PURPOSE: The main objective was to list evidences about the role and impact of pharmacists. METHODS: Themes were chosen according to three dimensions of the pharmacist profession: (1) activities, (2) healthcare programs and (3) disorders. A literature search was conducted for each theme. A bibliographic data sheet was completed for each article. An analytic data sheet, consisting of descriptive and impact outcomes, was also completed for the most relevant articles. For each theme, a synthesis was elaborated. The website Impact Pharmacie (http://impactpharmacie.org) was developed. RESULTS: A total of 70 synthesis were written. A total of 1442 articles were included with a bibliographic data sheet, and 914 with an analytic data sheet. Six hundred and fifty articles had positive outcomes on the role of the pharmacist, representing 803 different positive outcome markers. Pharmacists had positive outcomes on morbidity (n=212), adherence (n=92), costs (n=36), adverse effects (n=26), drug errors (n=31) and mortality (n=13). CONCLUSION: This descriptive study presents the review of the evidence on the role and the impact of pharmacists activities, which led to the Impact Pharmacie website. This francophone website can contribute to support clinical pharmacy development, and to a better use of pharmacists in healthcare.

The Joint Commission's Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation Process: Costly, Ineffective, and Potentially Harmful to Safety Culture.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the estimated labor costs and effectiveness of Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation (OPPE) processes at identifying outlier performers in a large sample of providers across multiple health care systems and to extrapolate costs and effectiveness nationally. METHODS: Six hospital systems partnered to evaluate their labor expenses related to conducting OPPE. Estimates for mean labor hours and wages were created for the following: data analysts, medical staff office professionals, department physician leaders, and administrative assistants. The total number of outlier performers who were identified by OPPE metrics alone and that resulted in lack of renewal, limitation, or revoking of hospital privileges during the past annual OPPE cycle (2022) was recorded. National costs of OPPE were extrapolated. Literature review of the effect of OPPE on safety culture in radiology was performed. RESULTS: The evaluated systems had 12,854 privileged providers evaluated by OPPE. The total estimated annual recurring labor cost per provider was $50.20. Zero of 12,854 providers evaluated were identified as outlier performers solely through the OPPE process. The total estimated annual recurring cost of administering OPPE nationally was $78.54 million. In radiology over the past 15 years, the use of error rates based on score-based peer review as an OPPE metric has been perceived as punitive and had an adverse effect on safety culture. CONCLUSION: OPPE is expensive to administer, inefficient at identifying outlier performers, diverts human resources away from potentially more effective improvement work, and has been associated with an adverse impact on safety culture in radiology.

Lack of Benefit of Adjusting Adaptively Daily Invitations for the Evaluation of the Quality of Anesthesiologists' Supervision and Nurse Anesthetists' Work Habits.

Introduction Whenever a department implements the evaluation of professionals, a reasonable operational goal is to request as few evaluations as possible. In anesthesiology, evaluations of anesthesiologists (by trainees) and nurse anesthetists (by anesthesiologists) with valid and psychometrically reliable scales have been made by requesting daily evaluations of the ratee's performance on the immediately preceding day. However, some trainees or nurse anesthetists are paired with the same anesthesiologist for multiple days of the same week. Multiple evaluations from the same rater during a given week may contribute little incremental information versus one evaluation from that rater for the week. We address whether daily evaluation requests could be adjusted adaptively to be made once per week, hopefully substantively reducing the number of evaluation requests. Methods Every day since 1 July 2013 at the studied department, anesthesia residents and fellows have been requested by email to evaluate anesthesiologists' quality of supervision provided during the preceding day using the De Oliveira Filho supervision scale. Every day since 29 March 2015, the anesthesiologists have been requested by email to evaluate the work habits of the nurse anesthetists during the preceding day. Both types of evaluations were made for interactions throughout the workday together, not for individual cases. The criterion for an electronic request to be sent is that the pair worked together for at least one hour that day. The current study was performed using evaluations of anesthesiologists' supervision and nurse anesthetists' work habits through 30 June 2023. Results If every evaluation request were completed by trainees on the same day it was requested, trainees would have received 13.5% fewer requests to evaluate anesthesiologists (9367/69,420), the maximum possible reduction. If anesthesiologists were to do the same for their evaluations of nurse anesthetists, the maximum possible reduction would be 7.1% fewer requests (4794/67,274). However, because most evaluations were completed after the day of the request (71%, 96,451/136,694), there would be fewer requests only if the evaluation were completed before or on the day of the next pairing. Consequently, in actual practice, there would have been only 2.4% fewer evaluation requests to trainees and 1.5% fewer to anesthesiologists, both decreases being significantly less than 5% (both adjusted P <0.0001). Among the trainees' evaluations of faculty anesthesiologists, there were 1.4% with very low scores, specifically, a mean score of less than three out of four (708/41,778). Using Bernoulli cumulative sum (CUSUM) among successive evaluations, 72 flags were raised over the 10 years. Among those, there were 36% with more than one rater giving an exceptionally low score during the same week (26/72). There were 97% (70/72) with at least one rater contributing more than one score to the recent cumulative sum. Conclusion Conceptually, evaluation requests could be skipped if a rater has already evaluated the ratee that week during an earlier day working together. Our results show that the opportunity for reductions in evaluation requests is significantly less than 5%. There may also be impaired monitoring for the detection of sudden major decreases in ratee performance. Thus, the simpler strategy of requesting evaluations daily after working together is warranted.

[Retrospective study of the impact of training on the management of immediate post-partum hemorrhage]. / Impact d'une formation sur la prise en charge de l'hémorragie du post-partum.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the introduction of training workshops on the quality of prevention and management of Post-Partum Hemorrhage (PPH) in a type III university center. METHODS: A clinical audit was carried out in our type III university center before and after the introduction of training workshops on the prevention and management of PPH, in two periods between January 1st to December 31st 2011 and March 1st and August 1st, 2015. Training workshops were according to the recommendations for clinical practice of the National College of Gynecologists-Obstetricians French published in 2014, and included a theoretical portion and a simulation of low fidelity manikin. Data on the management of patients presenting with PPH after vaginal birth of a singleton were retrospectively collected consecutively from medical records. Data were collected using a standardized analytical grid. Between the two data collections, some improvement actions were implemented. RESULTS: After implementation of training workshops, the proportion of patients with active management of the third stage of labor (prophylactic uterotonic after delivery) has significantly improved (72% before, vs. 92% after, P=0.001); time to PPH diagnosis has been significantly higher notified (40% before, vs. 94% after, P<0.001), as well as the quantification of bleeding at diagnosis (46% before, vs. 72% after, P<0.003) and total bleeding (68% before, vs. 92%, P<0.001). PPH-specific monitoring sheet was found to be used significantly more frequently (3 before, vs. 30 after, P=0.00015). Additionally, the Physician Anesthesiologist has been contacted significantly more often (34% before, vs. 53% after, P=0.002). CONCLUSION: Our study highlights a significant improvement in professional practices between 2011 and 2015 on PPH prevention and management in our type III university center.

Transition From Peer Review to Peer Learning: Experience in a Radiology Department.

PURPOSE: To describe the process by which a radiology department moved from peer review to peer collaborative improvement (PCI) and review data from the first 16 months of the PCI process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the first 16 months after PCI were reviewed: number of case reviews performed, number of learning opportunities identified, percentage yield of learning opportunities identified, type of learning opportunities identified, and comparison of the previous parameters between case randomly reviewed versus actively pushed (issues actively identified and entered). Changes in actively pushed cases were also assessed as volume per month over the 16 months (run chart). Faculty members were surveyed about their perception of the conversion to PCI. RESULTS: In all, 12,197 cases were peer reviewed, yielding 1,140 learning opportunities (9.34%). The most common types of learning opportunities for all reviewed cases included perception (5.1%) and reporting (1.9%). The yield of learning opportunities from actively pushed cases was 96.3% compared with 3.88% for randomly reviewed cases. The number of actively pushed cases per month increased over the course of the period and established two new confidence intervals. The faculty survey revealed that the faculty perceived the new PCI process as positive, nonpunitive, and focused on improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that a switch to PCI is perceived as nonpunitive and associated with increased radiologist submission of learning opportunities. Active entering of identified learning opportunities had a greater yield and perceived value, compared with random review of cases.

Measuring Quality for Individual Anesthesia Clinicians.

A robust quality management system (QMS) will provide value to patients, providers, and hospitals or systems by focusing on system performance. The QMS must remain independent of provider-specific measures used for privileging. Some outcome measures may be used to assess system performance; they must not be used to assess individual provider performance. All anesthesia providers, especially leaders, must be guardians of an organization's safety culture.

[Preoperative cardiac-risk assessment for non-cardiac surgery: The French RICARDO survey]. / Évaluation du Risque CARDiaque de l'Opéré (RICARDO) : enquête nationale auprès des anesthésistes-réanimateurs concernant la prise en charge périopératoire du patient à risque cardiaque.

OBJECTIVES: Professional practice evaluation of anaesthesiologist for high cardiac-risk patient cares in non-cardiac surgery, and assess disparities between results and recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since June to September 2011, a self-questionnaire was sent to 5000 anesthesiologist. They were considered to be representative of national anesthesiology practitioner. Different items investigated concerned: demography, preoperative cardiac-risk assessment, modalities of specialized cardiologic advice, per- and postoperative care, and finally knowledge of current recommendations. RESULTS: We collected 1255 questionnaire, that is to say 25% of answers. Men were 73%, 38% were employed by public hospital; 70% worked in a shared operating theatre with a general activity. With regards to preoperative assessment, 85% of anaesthetists referred high cardiac-risk patient to a cardiologist. In only 16% of answer, Lee's score appeared in anaesthesia file to assess perioperative cardiac-risk. Only 61% considered the six necessary items to optimal estimate of cardiac-risk. On the other hand, 91% measured routinely the exercise capacities by interrogation. The most frequently doing exam (49% of anaesthetist) was an electrocardiogram in elderly patient. In 96% of case, beta-blockers were given in premedication if they were usually thought. Clopidogrel was stopped by 62% of anesthetist before surgery. In this case, 38% used another medication to take over from this one. Only 7% considered revascularization in coronary patient who were effectively treated. POISE study was know by 40% of practitioner, and 18% estimated that they have changed their practice. Preoperatively, 21% organized multidisciplinary approach for high-risk patient. During surgery, 63% monitored the ST-segment. In postoperative period for cardiac-risk patient, only 11% prescribed systematically an ECG, a troponin dosage, a postoperative monitoring of ST-segment, a cardiologic advice. In case of moderate troponin elevation, they were 70% to realize at least an ECG and/or an echocardiography. CONCLUSION: This study highlights some difference between current recommendation concerning assessment of cardiac-risk patient in non-cardiac surgery and daily practice of anesthetist, justifying regular update of this one.

[Blood transfusion practices: about transfusions at night]. / Pratiques transfusionnelles à risque : à propos des transfusions de nuit.

Blood transfusion safety covers all stages from prescription of immuno-haematological examinations until the completion of the transfusion. According to the 05/11/2006 Afssaps' decision on good transfusion practices, transfusions should not be given at night unless the patient is actively bleeding or has some other urgent clinical need. A retrospective study was used to assess the proportion of transfusions at night. Through this professional practice evaluation, we analyze the reasons leading to perform transfusions at late hours, in order to reduce errors and improve safety for patients.