Surgical Reconstruction with Tendon Allografting Following Iatrogenic Rupture of the Plantar Fascia: A Case Report.

Plantar fasciitis is a common cause of heel pain, and the disorder is generally self-limiting after adequate conservative treatment. When conservative treatment is unsuccessful, surgical release is an effective treatment option. Here we report a case of iatrogenic plantar fascia rupture after surgical release for treatment of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. Preoperative MRI revealed a 4.2 cm gap between the distal fascia stump and the calcaneal tuberosity in the sagittal view at 8 months post-injury. To circumvent the possibility of rupture site retear or poor tissue healing by direct repair, we used tendon allografting for the reconstruction of the chronic plantar fascia rupture. The patient gradually recovered after the surgery. Complications of plantar fascia rupture after surgical release is a potential risk but rarely observed. Chronic plantar fascia rupture with medial arch collapse is difficult to treat. We used a tendon allograft to reconstruct the plantar fascia, restoring its function and mechanical strength. After 5 years of follow-up, no complications were reported, and magnetic resonance imaging indicated the reconstructed plantar fascia tissue to be in good condition.

Biomechanical Study Comparing Pulvertaft, Double Side-to-Side, and Locking Side-to-Side Tendon Suture Techniques.

PURPOSE: In this study, we present a single-sided locking side-to-side (STS) suture technique as a possible alternative for the Pulvertaft weave in tendon transfers. The aim of the study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of the single-sided locking STS reconstruction with Pulvertaft and double-sided nonlocking STS reconstructions. METHODS: Twenty-four human cadaveric extensor digitorum communis tendons and 24 flexor digitorum superficialis tendons were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups, resulting in a total of 8 flexor tendons and 8 extensor tendons per group: Pulvertaft, double-sided nonlocking STS, and single-sided locking STS reconstructions. Load to failure was measured with a tensile testing machine. Increase in cross-sectional area was used as a measure of bulkiness at the reconstruction site. RESULTS: In extensor tendons, single-sided locking STS reconstructions showed a higher load to failure than Pulvertaft reconstructions, whereas no difference was found in load to failure between single-sided locking and double-sided nonlocking STS reconstructions. In flexor tendons, single-sided locking STS reconstructions showed a higher load to failure than Pulvertaft reconstructions. However, load to failure of single-sided locking STS reconstructions was less than double-sided nonlocking STS reconstructions. In both extensor and flexor tendons, the percent increase in cross-sectional area at the reconstruction site was higher in Pulvertaft reconstructions than single-sided locking STS reconstructions, whereas no difference was found between single-sided locking STS and double-sided nonlocking STS reconstructions. CONCLUSIONS: Single-sided locking and double-sided nonlocking STS reconstructions are suitable alternatives to the Pulvertaft technique for tendon transfers owing to a higher strength and less bulkiness. Because load to failure of both STS reconstructions did not differ in extensor tendon transfers, the single-sided locking STS reconstruction seems especially suitable for extensor tendon transfers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides anatomical evidence that the single-sided locking STS reconstruction yields a higher strength and is less bulky than the Pulvertaft reconstruction in tendon transfers.

Side-to-Side Versus Pulvertaft Extensor Tenorrhaphy-A Biomechanical Study.

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that a side-to-side (STS) tendon repair has biomechanical characteristics that match those of a Pulvertaft (PT) weave. METHODS: Thirty extensor tendons were harvested (4 extensor digitorum communis and 1 extensor indicis proprius from 6 cadaver arms). Three hand surgery fellows with similar backgrounds of training under the same conditions and precise standardized technique performed the repairs (5 PT and 5 STS per surgeon). After the repairs, the tendons were passed through a graft-sizing guide to determine bulk and results were expressed as a repaired versus native diameter ratio. The specimens were then tested for ultimate strength and fatigue properties. Failure type and mechanical properties were recorded and compared with those of the native tendon. RESULTS: The average peak force to failure was 93 ± 20 N for the STS and 62 ± 32 N for PT group. Relative strength ratio (repair strength compared with native tendon strength) was 37% ± 21% for the STS and 22% ± 11% for the PT group. In the STS group, all failures occurred as a result of tissue failure; however, in the PT, suture failures occurred in 3 tendons before tissue failure. The mean bulk ratio of the repaired site versus native proximal tendon was 37 ± 14% and 40% ± 22% more for the STS and PT groups, respectively. These values for native distal tendon were 28% ± 9.9% and 26% ±24 %, respectively for STS and PT repair. Furthermore, the bulk of the repaired site for the STS and PT groups was 4.2 ± 0.50 and 4.7 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Side-to-side repair technique showed superior biomechanical properties while demonstrating comparable repair bulk of the tendon coaptation compared with the Pulvertaft weave. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this study may help guide a surgeon's choice of repair technique when addressing tendon injuries or tendon transfers.

Biomechanical Strength of a Novel Tendon Splicing Open Book Technique Compared to the Pulvertaft Method Using Unembalmed Human Cadaveric Tissue.

Background: Extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon rupture is a known complication of distal radius fractures. The Pulvertaft graft technique is currently used for tendon transfer of extensor indicis proprious (EIP) to EPL. This technique can produce unwanted tissue bulkiness and cosmetic concerns as well as hinder tendon gliding. A novel "open book" technique has been proposed, but relevant biomechanical data are limited. We designed a study to examine the biomechanical behaviours of the "open book" versus Pulvertaft techniques. Methods: Twenty matched forearm-wrist-hand samples were harvested from 10 fresh frozen cadavers (2 female, 8 male) with a mean age of 61.7 (±19.25) years. The EIP was transferred to EPL using the Pulvertaft versus "open book" techniques for each matched pair (sides randomly assigned). The repaired tendon segments were mechanically loaded using a Materials Testing System to examine graft biomechanical behaviours. Results: Mann-Whitney U test outcomes demonstrated that there was no significant difference between "open book" versus Pulvertaft techniques for peak load, load at yield, elongation at yield, or repair width. The "open book" technique demonstrated a significantly lower elongation at peak load and repair thickness, as well as significantly higher stiffness when compared with the Pulvertaft technique. Conclusions: Our findings support the use of the "open book" technique, producing comparable biomechanical behaviours compared to the Pulvertaft technique. Incorporating the "open book" technique potentially requires smaller repair volume, producing size and appearance that is more anatomic when compared with the Pulvertaft.

Contexte: La rupture du tendon du long extenseur du pouce (EPL - Extensor pollicis longus) est une complication connue des fractures distales du radius. La technique de greffe de Pulvertaft est actuellement utilisée pour un transfert tendineux de l'extenseur propre de l'index (EIP - extensor indicis proprious) à l'EPL. Cette technique peut produire une masse de tissu volumineuse non désirée et des préoccupations cosmétiques, mais aussi gêner le glissement du tendon. Une nouvelle technique en « livre ouvert ¼ a été proposée, mais les données biomécaniques pertinentes sont limitées. Nous avons conçu une étude visant à examiner les comportements biomécaniques de la technique « en livre ouvert ¼ comparativement à la technique de Pulvertaft. Méthodes: Vingt échantillons appariés avant-bras-poignet-main ont été prélevés sur 10 cadavres récemment congelés (2 femmes, 8 hommes) d'âge moyen 61,7 (± 19,25) ans. Les EIP ont été transférés aux EPL en utilisant la technique de Pulvertaft et la technique en livre ouvert pour chaque paire appariée (l'affectation du côté à chaque technique a été faite de manière aléatoire). Les segments tendineux réparés ont été chargés mécaniquement au moyen d'un système pour tester les matériaux afin d'étudier les comportements biomécaniques des greffes. Résultats: Les résultats du test U de Mann-Whitney ont montré qu'il n'y avait pas de différence significative entre la technique « en livre ouvert ¼ et la technique de Pulvertaft pour la charge maximum, la charge à la limite apparente d'élasticité, l'allongement à la limite apparente d'élasticité ou la largeur de réparation. La technique « en livre ouvert ¼ a démontré un allongement à la charge maximum et une épaisseur de réparation significativement moindres, ainsi qu'une significativement plus grande raideur, comparativement à la technique de Pulvertaft. Conclusions: Nos constatations étayent l'utilisation de la technique « en livre ouvert ¼ qui procure des comportements biomécaniques comparables à ceux de la technique de Pulvertaft. L'incorporation de la technique « en livre ouvert ¼ requiert potentiellement un plus petit volume de réparation, aboutissant à des dimensions et à un aspect plus anatomiques par rapport à la technique de Pulvertaft.

Alternative Tendon Coaptations to the Pulvertaft Weave Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Biomechanical Studies.

BACKGROUND: The Pulvertaft weave technique (PT) is frequently used during tendon repairs and transfers. However, this technique is associated with limitations. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed on in vitro, biomechanical studies that compared the PT with alternative techniques. METHODS: Articles included for qualitative and/or qualitative analysis were identified following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies included in the meta-analysis were analyzed either as continuous data with inverse variance and random effects or as dichotomous data using a Mantel-Haenszel analysis assuming random effects to calculate an odds ratio. RESULTS: A comprehensive electronic search yielded 8 studies meeting inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Two studies with a total of 65 tendon coaptations demonstrated no significant difference in strength between the PT and traditional side-to-side (STS) techniques (P = .92). Two studies with a total of 43 tendon coaptations showed that the STS with 1 weave has a higher yield strength than the PT (P = .03). Two studies with a total of 62 tendon repairs demonstrated no significant difference in strength between the PT and the step-cut (SC) techniques (P = .70). The final 2 studies included 46 tendon repairs and demonstrated that the wrap around (WA) technique has a higher yield strength than the PT (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The STS, SC, and WA techniques are preferred for improving tendon form. The STS and WA techniques have superior yield strengths than the PT, and the SC technique withstands similar stress to failure as the PT.

Biomechanical comparison of tenorrhaphy constructs for tendon reconstructions and transfers.

With tendon transfers or reconstructions, the tenorrhaphy must be strong enough to withstand early mobilization in the immediate postoperative period to decrease adhesion formation and optimize functional outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare the strength, bulk, and gliding resistance of four common tendon-to-tendon attachment constructs. A biomechanical study was performed utilizing 80 cadaveric tendons to compare four common tendon tenorrhaphy constructs: the end-weave (EW); Pulvertaft (PT); single-pass, side-to-side (SP-STS); and simple, side-to-side (STS) attachments. The primary outcome measures investigated included tenorrhaphy morphology, gliding resistance, tensile strength, and deformation at failure of the different constructs. A total of 40 tendon pairs, 10 per repair group, were constructed, biomechanically evaluated, and outcomes were compared. There were no significant differences in the cross-sectional area of the native tendon (p = 0.334) or repair site (p = 0.564) and no difference in the added bulk of the repair (p = 0.663) between the repair groups. Gliding resistance was not significantly different between the repair groups (p = 0.110). The SP-STS repair was significantly stronger (p < 0.001), stiffer (p < 0.001), and exhibited less displacement at peak load (p = 0.004), and greater force generation at 1 cm of displacement (p = 0.002) compared to the other constructs. The SP-STS is significantly stronger, without a significant difference in bulk and gliding resistance compared to the PT, EW, STS repairs. SP-STS can be utilized in tendon transfers and reconstructions to safely permit early active mobilization.

In Vitro Comparison between the Pulvertaft Weave and the Modified Core Suture Pulvertaft Weave.

Background: The Pulvertaft weave was described more than 50 years ago and is still used in tendon transfers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the strength of a modified core suture Pulvertaft weave technique and compare it to the original Pulvertaft weave traditionally used in tendon transfer surgery. Methods: 12 extensor pollicis longus tendons and extensor indices proprius tendons were harvested from fresh frozen cadavers. Six Pulvertaft weaves were performed using FiberWire 4.0 and six core suture tendon weave were performed using FiberLoop 4.0. Biomechanical analysis was performed and stifness, first failure load and ultimate failure load were measured for both set of repairs. Results: The stiffness of the core suture tendon repair (9.5 N/mm) was greater than that of the Pulvertaft repair (2.5 N/mm) The first failure load of the core suture tendon repairs (68.9 N) was greater than the Pulvertaft repairs (19.2 N) and the ultimate failure load of the core suture tendon repairs (101.8 N) was greater than the Pulvertaft repairs (21.9 N). All of these differences were statistically significant. Conclusions: The core suture Pulvertaft weave is a modification to the Pulvertaft weave used in tendon transfers. The results of this cadaveric study suggest it is 5 times stronger than the traditional Pulvertaft repair, potentially allowing it to be used with early active motion protocols after tendon transfers.

The use of barbed sutures in the Pulvertaft weave: a biomechanical study.

The use of barbed sutures in tendon repair and reconstruction is advantageous because it allows for a knotless suturing technique. In this biomechanical study, we compared barbed sutures with conventional sutures in tendon transfers using the Pulvertaft weave technique in a human cadaveric model. Thirty human cadaveric finger flexor tendons were transected and divided into three groups of ten tendons, which were then reconstructed by the Pulvertaft weave technique using 3-0 Prolene (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ, USA), 3-0 Ethilon (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ, USA) or 3-0 V-Loc (Covidien Deutschland GmbH, Neustadt, Germany) sutures. Biomechanical testing showed that repairs in the V-Loc group had significantly greater ultimate tensile strength and stiffness than conventional sutures. The time taken to complete the weave and the length of sutures used were also the least in the V-Loc group. Our study has shown that the barbed suture has a better biomechanical performance than conventional suture types when used in the Pulvertaft weave technique.

The strengths of one-, two-, and three-weave Pulvertaft tendon repairs.

We tested the tensile strength of the proximal juncture of tendon grafts with Pulvertaft tendon repairs in 18 cadaveric digital flexor tendons. These tendons were divided into three groups of six: single, two, or three weaves. Each of the interlacing weaves was secured with eight anchoring sutures. The specimens were loaded in a biomechanical tester until failure. The ultimate tensile strength did not show any significant differences across all three groups with statistical power of 0.77. The mean tendon elongation before repair failure showed significant difference at 10 mm (standard deviation (SD) 2), 16 mm (SD 3), and 15 mm (SD 3), respectively. All specimens failed by intra-tendinous pull-out of the weaves. We conclude that the two-weave Pulvertaft construct demonstrated comparable tensile strength to three weaves and tendon elongation was similar when two or three weaves were used.

Biomechanical Evaluation Comparing Pulvertaft Weave and Side-to-Side Tenorrhaphy Using Porcine Tendons.

Background: Pulvertaft Weave (PTW) is an established method of tenorrhapy in tendon transfers. Previous studies have suggested that a Side-to-Side (STS) tenorrhapy is easier to perform has the same advantages and has greater load to failure, ultimate load and stiffness compared to PTW. However, there is insufficient data comparing behaviour of STS and PTW during cyclical loading. The aim of this study is to compare these two methods in terms of creep after cyclic landing. Methods: Fresh porcine flexor digitorum tendons were used. Ten tendon PTW and ten STS repairs were performed. Cross sectional diameter was measured. The tendon repairs were tested by applying tension up to 25N for 100 cycles, followed by tension up to 75N for 100 cycles, followed by loading to failure. Force-displacement data was used to determine the creep of the repaired tendon. Results: All tendons survived 100 cycles of loading at 25N. After 1 cycle of loading, the mean cyclic creep in the PTW group was almost 3 mm larger than in the STS group (p = 0.046). After 100 cycles, the mean cyclic creep in the PTW group was 4.4 mm larger (p = 0.008). The cyclic creep rate was significantly larger in the PTW group (p < 0.001). All STS but only four PTW repairs survived after cyclic loading at 75N (p = 0.01). After 1 cycle and 100 cycles, mean creep of the surviving PTW samples was almost 7 mm (p = 0.006) and almost 9 mm (p = 0.004) larger than the STS group. The mean load to failure was four times larger in the STS group than the PTW group (p = 0.004). Conclusions: STS repairs have a significantly smaller permanent elongation after cyclic loading at 25N and 75N, a significantly smaller cyclic creep rate, require a significantly larger load to fail. This implies that STS repairs are less likely to elongate after cyclic loading and can withstand greater loads. These properties can be valuable in allowing patients to commence mobilisation immediately after surgery.

Strength of Pulvertaft modifications: tensile testing of porcine flexor tendons.

The aim of the study was to present two new modifications of the Pulvertaft weave, allowing a higher number of weaves without the need for a longer overlap. The mechanical properties were measured and compared with the traditional technique. Forty-five pairs of porcine flexor tendons were randomized to a Pulvertaft repair with three weaves, a Double Pulvertaft and Locking Pulvertaft repairs. In the last two repairs one of the tendons in each repair was split in two before weaving. A difference in the maximum stiffness was observed between the three groups (p = 0.024). All repairs failed by the sutures being sheared through the tendons splitting the tendon fibres longitudinally. The two modifications were both stronger than the Pulvertaft weave and provide an alternative when a strong connection is needed and a longer overlap is impossible.

Comparative Biomechanical Characteristics of Modified Side-to-Side Repair and Modified Pulvertaft Weaving Repair - In vitro Study.

BACKGROUND: Strong surgical repair is the mechanical basis of early mobilization and prerequisite for biological healing following tendon grafting. Side to side and pulvertaft repairs were developed to meets these demands. However, these techniques have later been modified to improve the strength of repair but their characteristics have not been compared. METHODS: We compared biomechanical strength of the modified side-to-side (SS) repair with the modified Pulvertaft (PT) repair technique in turkey tendons keeping overlap length, anchor points, type of suture, suture throw and amount of suture similar. Two investigators performed 34 repairs during one summer month to test the tensile strength of the repair using mechanical strength testing machine. Variables measured were maximum load, load to first failure, modulus, load at break, mode of failure, site of failure, tensile strain, tensile stress. The statistical comparison was carried by Levene's test and T test for means. RESULTS: The mean maximum load for modified SS repair was 50.3 (SD 13.7) N and modified PT repair was 46.9 (SD 16.4) N. The tensile stress at maximum load for SS and modified PT repair was 4.7 (SD 4) MPa and 4.2 (SD 3) MPa respectively. The suture cut through was the commonest mode of failure. CONCLUSIONS: We found no statistical difference between 2 repairs in load at which they started failing (p = 0.16), and maximum load repairs could withstand (p = 0.35). Our study uniquely compares two techniques under standard conditions, and contrary to existing evidence found no difference. However, in our opinion the number of anchor points may have a greater impact than number of weaves on the strength.

Strength of Interference Screw Fixation to Cuboid vs Pulvertaft Weave to Peroneus Brevis for Tibialis Posterior Tendon Transfer for Foot Drop.

BACKGROUND: Tibialis posterior (TP) tendon transfer is an effective treatment for foot drop. Currently, standard practice is to immobilize the ankle in a cast for 6 weeks nonweightbearing, risking postoperative stiffness. To assess whether early active dorsiflexion and protected weightbearing could be safe, the current study assessed tendon displacement under cyclic loading and load to failure, comparing the Pulvertaft weave (PW) to interference screw fixation (ISF) in a cadaveric foot model. METHODS: Twenty-four cadaveric ankles had TP tendon transfer performed, 12 with the PW technique and 12 with ISF to the cuboid. The TP tendon was cycled 1000 times at 50 to 150 N and then loaded to failure in a materials testing machine. Tendon displacement at the insertion site was recorded every 100 cycles. An independent t test and 2-way analysis of variance were performed to compare techniques, with a significance level of P < .05. RESULTS: Mean tendon displacement was similar in the PW group (2.9 ± 2.5 mm [mean ± SD]) compared with the ISF group (2.4 ± 1.1 mm), P = .35. One specimen in the ISF group failed early by tendon pullout. None of the PW group failed early, although displacement of 8.9 mm was observed in 1 specimen. Mean load to failure was 419.1 ± 82.6 N in the PW group in comparison to 499.4 ± 109.6 N in the ISF group, P = .06. CONCLUSION: For TP tendon transfer, ISF and PW techniques were comparable, with no differences in tendon displacement after cyclical loading or load to failure. Greater variability was observed in the PW group, suggesting it may be a less reliable technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results indicate that early active dorsiflexion and protected weightbearing may be safe for clinical evaluation, with potential benefits for the patient compared with cast immobilization.

In Carthage ruins: the illness of Sir Winston Churchill at Carthage, December 1943.

This paper reviews Churchill's illness in Carthage in December 1943. It was characterised by fever that lasted 6 days, left lower lobe pneumonia and two episodes of atrial fibrillation. He was managed in a private villa by Lord Moran, his personal physician, with the assistance of two nurses and the expert advice of colleagues. Sulphadiazine and digitalis leaf were prescribed and Churchill recovered. It is remarkable that, despite the severity of his illness, he continued to direct the affairs of State from his bed.

Biomechanical and Dimensional Measurements of the Pulvertaft Weave Versus the Cow-Hitch Technique.

Background: In this study, biomechanical strength and bulkiness of the cow-hitch technique and Pulvertaft weave were compared. Our goal was to investigate whether the cow hitch can withstand equal strength in comparison with the Pulvertaft and to see if there is a difference in bulk, which could enhance gliding function and reduce friction and adhesion formation. Methods: Sheep tendons were used to perform 10 cow-hitch and 10 Pulvertaft repairs. Tensile strength was obtained with a cyclic loading tensile testing machine and tendon width and height measurements were obtained through digital analysis by photographs of the repairs. Results: The cow hitch showed significantly better ultimate strength and had less bulk. There was no statistical difference in displacement, defined as gain in total length of the tendon. Conclusions: The results in this study show that the cow hitch outperforms the Pulvertaft weave in both ultimate strength and bulk.

Biomechanical assessment of a novel tendon junction.

The Pulvertaft weave has been the standard tendon junction technique used both in tendon transfers and tendon grafts. A limitation of this repair is the sequential failure of stabilizing sutures, rather than the tendon. A novel loop weave is described and compared with the Pulvertaft weave in biomechanical performance. Ovine deep flexor and extensor tendons were used to simulate Pulvertaft or loop weaves (n = 11) for tensile testing. The Pulvertaft weaves failed at the stabilizing sutures, whereas the loop weaves repairs failed by longitudinal splitting of the motor tendon. The loop weave demonstrated significantly higher mean initial failure and ultimate strengths. Tensile loads required to elongate the loop weave by 4, 6, and 8 mm were significantly higher, while more displacement was associated with the Pulvertaft repair under the application of 50, 75, and 100 N tensile loads. This study demonstrates favourable biomechanical characteristics of the new loop weave technique.