RET Fusion-Positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: The Evolving Treatment Landscape.

The objective of this narrative review is to summarize the efficacy and safety of available therapies for rearranged during transfection (RET) fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including in patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Background information is provided on RET rearrangements in NSCLC and the molecular testing options available as well as an overview of clinical guidelines for molecular testing, which recommend broad molecular testing, including for RET rearrangements. The efficacy and safety of potential treatments for RET fusion-positive NSCLC, including multikinase inhibitors, RET-selective inhibitors, pemetrexed-based therapy, and immunotherapies are reviewed from Phase I/II and `real-world' studies, alongside an overview of primary and secondary resistance mechanisms. The RET-selective inhibitors, selpercatinib and pralsetinib, are preferred first-line therapy options for patients with RET fusion-positive metastatic NSCLC and are recommended as subsequent therapy if RET inhibitors have not been used in the first-line setting.

RET fusions as primary oncogenic drivers and secondary acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: RET fusions are rare oncogenic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While activating RET rearrangements are found in NSCLC patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genetic alterations at resistance to EGFR inhibitors, the extent to which co-occurring genomic alterations exist and how they might affect prognosis or therapy response is poorly understood. METHODS: Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to assess 380 baseline patients with primary RET fusions and 71 EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients who acquired RET fusions after developing resistance to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). RESULTS: Primary RET fusions were more likely associated with females and younger age, with KIF5B being the predominant fusion partner. In baseline patients, both SMAD4 (5.3% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.044) and MYC copy-number gain variants (6.9% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.009) were more frequently co-mutated with KIF5B-RET than CCDC6-RET. By contrast, CDKN2A (11.3% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.003) mutations were significantly enriched in CCDC6-RET-rearranged baseline patients. A significant increase in the proportion of CCDC6-RET was observed in acquired RET-rearranged patients (47.3% vs. 22.5%, P < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of patients harboring RB1 and TP53 double-mutations (5.5 vs. 10.0 months, P = 0.020) or ERBB2 amplification (5.6 vs. 10.0 months, P = 0.041) was significantly shorter than the wild-type counterparts. Moreover, we identified that RET fusions were more likely associated with acquired resistance (AR) to third-generation EGFR-TKIs than previous generations of EGFR-TKIs. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we depicted the mutational profiles of NSCLC patients who harbor RET fusions at baseline or after resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Furthermore, our results suggest that RET fusions mediate secondary resistance to third-generation EGFR-TKIs and might be associated with poor prognosis in patients with NSCLC.

LIBRETTO-432, a phase III study of adjuvant selpercatinib or placebo in stage IB-IIIA RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

Selpercatinib, a first-in-class, highly selective and potent central nervous system-active RET kinase inhibitor demonstrated clinically meaningful activity with manageable toxicity in pretreated and treatment-naive advanced/metastatic RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). LIBRETTO-432 is a global, randomized, double-blind, phase III trial evaluating selpercatinib versus placebo in stage IB-IIIA, RET fusion-positive NSCLC, previously treated with definitive surgery or radiation; participants must have undergone available anti-cancer therapy (including chemotherapy or durvalumab) or not be suitable for it, per investigator's discretion. The primary end point is investigator-assessed event-free survival (EFS) in the primary analysis population (stage II-IIIA RET fusion-positive NSCLC). Key secondary end points include EFS in the overall population, overall survival, and time to distant disease recurrence in the central nervous system.

Selpercatinib is approved in multiple countries for the treatment of advanced or metastatic RET-altered lung cancers. Selpercatinib has shown promising efficacy and safety results in patients with advanced/metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC. This is a summary of the LIBRETTO-432 study which compares selpercatinib with placebo in patients with earlier stages (stage IB-IIIA) of RET fusion-positive NSCLC, who have already undergone surgery or radiotherapy and applicable adjuvant chemotherapy. This study is active and currently recruiting new participants. This trial will evaluate how long people live without evidence of cancer recurrence, both during and after treatment. Side effects will also be evaluated in this study. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04819100 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Phase III study of selpercatinib versus chemotherapy ± pembrolizumab in untreated RET positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

Selpercatinib, a novel, highly selective and potent, inhibitor of RET, demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity with manageable toxicity in heavily pretreated and treatment-naive RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer patients in a Phase I/II clinical trial. LIBRETTO-431 (NCT04194944) is a randomized, global, multicenter, open-label, Phase III trial, evaluating selpercatinib versus carboplatin or cisplatin and pemetrexed chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab in treatment-naive patients with locally advanced/metastatic RET fusion-positive nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. The primary end point is progression-free survival by independent review. Key secondary end points include overall survival, response rate, duration of response and progression-free survival. Clinical trial registration: NCT04194944 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Characteristics and outcomes of RET-rearranged Korean non-small cell lung cancer patients in real-world practice.

OBJECTIVE: Since the first discovery of rearranged during transfection (RET) fusion in lung adenocarcinoma in 2011, two tyrosine kinase inhibitors, namely vandetanib and cabozantinib, are currently available. Despite favorable outcomes in systemic control, the intracranial therapeutic response remains insufficient. In this study, the clinical characteristics and outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with RET rearrangements were analyzed. METHODS: Patients with NSCLC harboring RET fusion who received treatment between January 2006 and January 2018 were analyzed. RET rearrangement was identified by FISH or NGS. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients were identified. About half of the patients were female (47.5%) and never smokers (50.9%). Most patients had adenocarcinoma (89.8%). A total of 17 patients (28.8%) had an intracranial lesion at the initial diagnosis of stage IV disease, and 11 additional patients (18.6%) developed intracranial metastases during follow-up. The median time to development of intracranial metastases was 19.0 months (95% CI: 9.6-28.5), resulting in a >60% cumulative incidence of brain metastasis at 24 months. The systemic efficacy of pemetrexed-based regimens was favorable with progression-free survival of 9.0 (95% CI: 6.9-11.2) and OS of 24.1 (95% CI: 15.2-33.0) months. The median progression-free survival for vandetanib and immunotherapy was 2.9 (95% CI: 2.0-3.8) and 2.1 (95% CI: 1.6-2.6) months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Given the likelihood of RET-rearranged NSCLC progressing to intracranial metastases and the absence of apparent clinical benefit of currently available targeted or immunotherapeutic agents, development of novel treatment with higher selectivity and better penetration of the blood-brain barrier remains a priority.

Identification of nicotinamide aminonaphthyridine compounds as potent RET kinase inhibitors and antitumor activities against RET rearranged lung adenocarcinoma.

RET rearrangement is a recently identified oncogenic mutation in lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) that accounts for approximately 2% of all NSCLCs. More than six fusion partners have been identified in NSCLC, such as KIF5B, CCDC6, NCOA4, TRIM33, CLIP1 and ERC1. Many RET inhibitors have been reported and some have progressed to the clinic. Similar to most kinase inhibitors, patients often respond to current RET inhibitors but relapse can occur due to the emergence of mutant RET kinases, such as RET (S904F) and (V804L/M), which are resistant to inhibition. Our group previously reported that the benzamide aminonaphthyridine HSN356, a multikinase inhibitor, also inhibited RET. In this study, we prepared various nicotinamide analogs of HSN356 and investigated RET inhibition to uncover the salient moieties on HSN356 that are important for kinase inhibition and to also evaluate if HSN356 and analogs thereof could inhibit mutant RET kinases, such as RET (S904F) and (V804L/M). Compound 3 (HSN608), the nicotinamide analog of HSN356, inhibits RET and mutant forms better than reported RET inhibitors such as Alectinib, Sorafenib, Vandetanib and Apatinib, and comparable to BLU667. HSN608 inhibited the growth of CCDC6-RET driven LC-2/ad cell line with IC50 of ~3 nM. Under similar conditions, BLU667 and vandetanib (two drugs being evaluated against RET-driven cancers in the clinic) inhibited the growth of LC-2/ad with IC50 values of ~10 and 328 nM respectively.

RET-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer and therapeutic implications.

First-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors are standard of care for non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) harbouring an epidermal growth factor receptor mutation, anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion or c-ros oncogene 1 rearrangement. Other targetable oncogenic drivers have been identified but testing for these is neither funded nor commonly performed in Australia. Using a case example, we discuss the importance of considering several other genomic aberrations in our population, such as rearrangements in the RET proto-oncogene, which occur in 1-2% of lung adenocarcinoma. New oncogenic drivers and corresponding targeted agents are constantly being discovered; these will continue to refine the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer in the era of precision medicine.

Vandetanib in pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer-harboring RET rearrangement: a phase II clinical trial.

Background: Chromosomal rearrangements involving RET, which are found in about 1% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), define a unique molecular subset. We performed this study to examine the efficacy and safety of vandetanib 300 mg daily in this patient population. Patients and methods: This study was a multi-center, open-label, phase II clinical trial. Patients were enrolled if they had metastatic or recurrent NSCLC with a RET rearrangement, which was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization, had progressive disease against platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, and had a performance status of 0-2. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Results: A total of 18 patients were enrolled in this study between July 2013 and October 2015. Patients were aged 35-71 years; three had a performance status of 2, and the majority were a heavily pretreated population (≥ two different previous chemotherapy regimens in 72% of the patients). Among the 17 evaluable patients, three had a partial response (objective response rate = 18%) and eight had a stable disease (disease control rate = 65%). Among these patients, the partial response or disease stabilization was durable for more than 6 months in eight patients. Vandetanib also showed a progression-free survival of 4.5 months, and an overall survival of 11.6 months during a median follow-up duration of 14 months. The safety profile was comparable with previous studies of vandetanib. Most vandetanib-related adverse events were mild with prevalent hypertension and rash (in >70% of patients). Grade 3 toxicity included hypertension (n = 3), QT prolongation (2), and elevation of aminotransferases (1), and as a consequence the dose was reduced in four patients. There were no adverse events associated with grade 4 or 5 toxicity. Conclusion: Vandetanib is moderately active in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC-harboring RET rearrangements.

Clinical outcomes with pemetrexed-based systemic therapies in RET-rearranged lung cancers.

BACKGROUND: RET rearrangements are targetable, oncogenic lung cancer drivers. While previous series have shown durable clinical benefit with pemetrexed-based therapies in ALK- and ROS1-rearranged lung cancers, the benefits of pemetrexed-based treatments in patients with RET-rearranged lung cancers relative to other genomic subsets have not previously been explored. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with pathologically confirmed stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinomas and evidence of a RET, ROS1, or ALK rearrangement, or a KRAS mutation was conducted. Patients were eligible if they received treatment with pemetrexed alone or in combination. The primary outcome of progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary outcomes of overall response rate (ORR, RECIST v1.1), time to progression (TTP), and time to treatment discontinuation were compared between RET-rearranged and groups of ROS1-rearranged, ALK-rearranged, and KRAS-mutant lung cancers. RESULTS: We evaluated 104 patients. Patients with RET-rearranged lung cancers (n = 18) had a median PFS of 19 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 12-not reached (NR)] that was comparable with patients with ROS1- (23 months, 95% CI 14-NR, n = 10) and ALK-rearranged (19 months, 95% CI 15-36, n = 36) lung cancers, and significantly improved compared with patients with KRAS-mutant lung cancers (6 months, 95% CI 5-9, P < 0.001, n = 40). ORR (45%), median TTP (20 months, 95% CI 17-NR), and median time to treatment discontinuation (21 months, 95% CI 6-NR) in patients with RET-rearranged lung cancers were not significantly different compared with patients with ALK- and ROS1-rearranged lung cancers, and improved compared with patients with KRAS-mutant lung cancers. CONCLUSION: Durable benefits with pemetrexed-based therapies in RET-rearranged lung cancers are comparable with ALK- and ROS1-rearranged lung cancers. When selecting therapies for patients with RET-rearranged lung cancers, pemetrexed-containing regimens should be considered.

Combined Dacomitinib and Selpercatinib Treatment for a Patient with EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Acquired CCDC6-RET Fusion.

RET rearrangements are recognized drivers in lung cancer, representing a small subset (1-2%) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Additionally, RET fusions also serve as a rare acquired resistance mechanism in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Only a few NSCLC cases have been reported with co-occurrence of EGFR mutations and RET fusions as an acquired resistance mechanism induced by EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). A 68-year-old man diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR L858R mutation initially responded well to dacomitinib, a second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Afterward, he developed acquired resistance accompanied by a RET rearrangement. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis revealed that the tumor possessed both the new CCDC6-RET fusion and the EGFR L858R mutation. Subsequently, he was treated with a combination of cisplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab resulting in a partial response. Nevertheless, his condition deteriorated as the disease progressed, manifesting as hydrocephalus, accompanied by altered consciousness and lower limb weakness. The subsequent combined treatment with dacomitinib and selpercatinib resulted in a significant improvement in neurological symptoms. Here, we first identified acquired CCDC6-RET fusion with a coexisting EGFR L858R mutation following dacomitinib treatment. Our findings highlight the importance of NGS for identifying RET fusions and suggest the potential combination of dacomitinib and selpercatinib to overcome this resistance. For NSCLC patients with RET rearrangements and no access to RET inhibitors, pemetrexed-based chemotherapy provides a feasible alternative.

Efficacy of first-line treatment options beyond RET-TKIs in advanced RET-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer: A multi-center real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Although RET-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (RET-TKIs) are the preferred first-line therapy for advanced RET-arranged NSCLC, most patients cannot afford them. In this population, bevacizumab, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy are the most commonly used regimens. However, the optimal scheme beyond RET-TKIs has not been defined in the first-line setting. METHODS: This retrospective study included 86 stage IV NSCLC patients harboring RET rearrangement from six cancer centers between May 2017 and October 2022. RET-TKIs, chemotherapy, or one of the combination therapies (including immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combined with chemotherapy (I + C), bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy (B + C), ICI and bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy (I + B + C)), were used as the first-line therapeutics. The clinical outcomes and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 86 patients received RET-TKIs, 57 received combination therapies, and 15 received chemotherapy alone. Their medium PFS (mPFS) were 16.92 months (95% CI: 5.9-27.9 months), 8.7 months (95% CI: 6.5-11.0 months), and 5.55 months (95% CI: 2.4-8.7 months) respectively. Among all the combination schemes, B + C (p = 0.007) or I + B + C (p = 0.025) gave beneficial PFS compared with chemotherapy, while I + C treatment (p = 0.169) generated comparable PFS with chemotherapy. In addition, I + B + C treatment had a numerically longer mPFS (12.21 months) compared with B + C (8.74 months) or I + C (7.89 months) schemes. In terms of safety, I + B + C treatment led to the highest frequency of hematological toxicity (50%) and vomiting (75%), but no ≥G3 adverse effect was observed. CONCLUSIONS: I + B + C might be a preferred option beyond RET-TKIs in the first-line therapy of RET-arranged NSCLC. Combination with Bevacizumab rather than with ICIs offered favorable survival compared with chemotherapy alone.

RET rearrangements are relevant to histopathologic subtypes and clinicopathological features in Thai papillary thyroid carcinoma patients.

Background: Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common type of thyroid cancer. The RET gene rearrangements CCDC6::RET and NCOA4::RET are the most common RET gene rearrangements in PTC patients. Different RET::PTC rearrangements are associated with different PTC phenotypes. Methods: Eighty-three formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) PTC samples were examined. The prevalence and expression levels of CCDC6::RET and NCOA4::RET were determined using semi-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The association of these rearrangements with clinicopathological data was investigated. Results: The presence of CCDC6::RET rearrangement was significantly associated with the classic subtype and absence of angio/lymphatic invasion (p < 0.05). While NCOA4::RET was associated with the tall-cell subtype, and presence of angio/lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that an absence of extrathyroidal extension and extranodal extension were independent predictive factors for CCDC6::RET, whereas the tall-cell subtype, large tumor size, angioinvasion, lymphatic invasion and perineural invasion were independent predictive factors for NCOA4::RET (p < 0.05). However, the mRNA expression level of CCDC6::RET and of NCOA4::RET were not significantly associated with clinicopathological data. Conclusion: CCDC6::RET was correlated with an innocent PTC subtype and characteristics, but NCOA4::RET correlated with an aggressive phenotype of PTC. Therefore, these RET rearrangements strongly associated with clinicopathological phenotypes and can be used as predictive markers in PTC patients.

Expanded Access Program Pralsetinib in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Rearranged during Transfection (RET) Gene Rearrangement.

PURPOSE: Rearranged during transfection (RET) gene rearrangement is a well-known driver event in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pralsetinib is a selective inhibitor of RET kinase and has shown efficacy in oncogenic RET-altered tumors. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of expanded access program (EAP) use of pralsetinib in pretreated, advanced NSCLC patients with RET rearrangement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received pralsetinib as part of the EAP at Samsung Medical Center were evaluated through a retrospective chart review. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) ver. 1.1 guidelines. Secondary endpoints were duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles. RESULTS: Between April 2020 and September 2021, 23 of 27 patients were enrolled in the EAP study. Two patients who were not analyzed due to brain metastasis and two patients whose expected survival was within 1 month were excluded from the analysis. After a median follow-up period of 15.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.0 to 21.2), ORR was 56.5%, the median PFS was 12.1 months (95% CI, 3.3 to 20.9), and the 12-month OS rate was 69.6%. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were edema (43.5%) and pneumonitis (39.1%). A total of 8.7% of patients experienced extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. TRAEs with a common grade of three or worse were neutropenia (43.5%) and anemia (34.8%). Dose reduction was required in nine patients (39.1%). CONCLUSION: Pralsetinib presents a clinical benefit when used in patients with RET-rearranged NSCLC, consistent with a pivotal study.

Pathological characteristics and tumour immune microenvironment of lung malignancies with RET rearrangement.

BACKGROUND: For patients with lung malignancies with RET rearrangement, the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is limited. The characteristics of the tumour immune microenvironment (TIME) and molecular pathological features of these patients have not been well elucidated. We aimed to investigate their clinical outcomes and explore characteristics of TIME, using multiplex immunohistochemistry technology (mIHC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The pathology and TIME characteristics of 29 patients with lung malignancies with RET rearrangement were retrospectively analysed, and their relationships with clinical efficacy and prognosis were investigated. Gene detection relied on high-throughput sequencing, and TIME detection was based on mIHC. RESULTS: Of 29 patients, 25(86%) had adenocarcinoma, and the acinar type accounted for the greatest percentage of patients, followed by the solid type, regardless of whether the disease was early or locally advanced and metastatic. In addition, we report a novel KIF5B-RET(k24:R8) rearrangement in pulmonary sarcoma. The density of CD8+ T cells in tumour stroma in early-stage patients was significantly higher than that in locally advanced and metastatic patients (P = 0.014). The proportion of M2 macrophages in tumour stroma was significantly higher than that in tumour parenchyma (P = 0.046). Although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.098), patients positive for M2 macrophage infiltration into the tumour parenchyma (≥5%) may have a better prognosis. Seven patients received immunotherapy and disease control rate was 85.7%. CONCLUSIONS: A novel KIF5B-RET rearrangement variant in pulmonary sarcoma shows similar TIME characteristics to lung cancer. amongst patients with lung malignancies with RET rearrangement, patients with M2 macrophage infiltration into the tumour parenchyma may have a better prognosis, but further studies with larger cohorts are needed.

Ultrasound images-based deep learning radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of RET rearrangement in papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Purpose: To create an ultrasound -based deep learning radiomics nomogram (DLRN) for preoperatively predicting the presence of RET rearrangement among patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 650 patients with PTC. Patients were divided into the RET/PTC rearrangement group (n = 103) and the non-RET/PTC rearrangement group (n = 547). Radiomics features were extracted based on hand-crafted features from the ultrasound images, and deep learning networks were used to extract deep transfer learning features. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was applied to select the features of nonzero coefficients from radiomics and deep transfer learning features; then, we established the deep learning radiomics signature. DLRN was constructed using a logistic regression algorithm by combining clinical and deep learning radiomics signatures. The prediction performance was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis. Results: Comparing the effectiveness of the models by linking the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of each model, we found that the area under the curve of DLRN could reach 0.9545 (95% confidence interval: 0.9133-0.9558) in the test cohort and 0.9396 (95% confidence interval: 0.9185-0.9607) in the training cohort, indicating that the model has an excellent performance in predicting RET rearrangement in PTC. The decision curve analysis demonstrated that the combined model was clinically useful. Conclusion: The novel ultrasonic-based DLRN has an important clinical value for predicting RET rearrangement in PTC. It can provide physicians with a preoperative non-invasive primary screening method for RET rearrangement diagnosis, thus facilitating targeted patients with purposeful molecular sequencing to avoid unnecessary medical investment and improve treatment outcomes.

Pralsetinib in RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: A real-world data (RWD) analysis from the Italian expanded access program (EAP).

OBJECTIVES: The selective RET-inhibitor pralsetinib has shown therapeutic activity in early clinical trials in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring rearranged during transfection (RET) gene fusions. To date, the real-world efficacy of pralsetinib in this population is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective efficacy and safety analysis was performed on data from patients with RET-fusion positive NSCLC enrolled in the pralsetinib Italian expanded access program between July 2019 and October 2021. RESULTS: Overall, 62 patients with RET-fusion positive NSCLC received pralsetinib at 20 Italian centers. Next-generation sequencing was used to detect RET alterations in 44 patients (73 %). The most frequent gene fusion partner was KIF5B (75 % of 45 evaluable). Median age was 62 years (range, 36-90), most patients were female (57 %) and never smokers (53 %). Brain metastases were known in 18 patients (29.5 %) at the time of pralsetinib treatment. 13 patients were treatment naïve (unfit for chemotherapy), 48 were pretreated (median number of previous lines: 1, range, 1-4). The objective response rate (ORR) was 66 % [95 % confidence interval (CI), 53-81] in the evaluable population (n = 59). The disease control rate (DCR) was 79 %. After a median follow-up of 10.1 months, the median progression free survival was 8.9 months (95 %CI, 4.7-NA). In patients with measurable brain metastases (n = 6) intracranial ORR was 83 %, intracranial DCR was 100 %. Overall, 83.6 % of patients experienced any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), 39 % grade 3 or greater (G ≥ 3). The most common G ≥ 3 TRAEs were neutropenia (9.8 %), dry mouth/oral mucositis (8.2 %), and thrombocytopenia (6.6 %). Seven patients (12 %) discontinued pralsetinib due to TRAEs, twenty-six had at least one dose level modification due to TRAEs. Two treatment-related deaths were observed (1 sepsis, 1 typhlitis). CONCLUSIONS: In the real-world setting, pralsetinib confirmed durable systemic activity and intracranial response in RET-fusion positive NSCLC. Toxicity profile was consistent with previous reports.

Case report: Dramatic response to pralsetinib in an elderly patient with advanced RET-fusion positive papillary thyroid carcinoma.

We are recently faced with a progressive evolution of the therapeutic paradigm for radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAI-R DTC), since the advent of tissue agnostic inhibitors. Thus, tumor genotype assessment is always more relevant and is playing a crucial role into clinical practice. We report the case of an elderly patient with advanced papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) harboring RET-CCDC6 fusion with four co-occurring mutations involving PI3KCA, TP53, and hTERT mutations, treated with pralsetinib under a compassionate use program. Despite the high histological grade and the coexistence of aggressive RET co-mutations, an impressive metabolic and structural tumor response has been obtained, together with a patient's prolonged clinical benefit. A timely comprehensive molecular testing of those cases wild-type for the common thyroid carcinoma BRAF V600E-like and RAS-like driver mutations may uncover actionable gene rearrangements that can be targeted by highly selective inhibitors with great potential benefit for the patients.

Phase 1/2 study of alectinib in RET-rearranged previously-treated non-small cell lung cancer (ALL-RET).

BACKGROUND: Rearranged during transfection (RET) rearrangements occur in 1-2% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Alectinib administered at doses of 300 mg and 600 mg twice daily (BID) is approved for. ALK: rearranged NSCLC in Japan and other countries, respectively. Since alectinib has activity against RET, we conducted a phase (P) 1/2 study of alectinib to determine its activity in Japanese patients with. RET: rearranged NSCLC. METHODS: This study was a single-arm, open-label, multi-institutional P1/2 trial. Previously treated patients with RET-rearranged NSCLC, screened by nation-wide network (LC-SCRUM-Japan), were recruited. In P1, alectinib (600 or 450 mg BID) was administered following a 3+3 design and its safety was assessed. During P2, alectinib was administered at the recommended dose (RD) determined in P1. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) in RET inhibitor-naïve patients treated with the RD of alectinib. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were administered alectinib. In cohort 1 (600 mg BID) of P1, we observed 5 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), including grade 3 rash and thromboembolic event, in 3 of 6 patients. In cohort 2 (450 mg BID), we observed no DLTs in 3 patients. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that AUC0-10 to 600 mg BID was higher than that previously reported in global trials. We determined 450 mg BID as the RD for P2. In 25 RET inhibitor-naïve patients, one achieved an objective response (4%) and 13 achieved disease control at 8 weeks (52%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.4 months (95% CI, 2.0-5.4), while the median overall survival was 19.0 months (5.4-NE). We observed grade 3 adverse events (AEs) (4%) including pneumonitis in P2. CONCLUSIONS: Alectinib exerts limited activity against RET-rearranged NSCLC. Further investigation to elucidate the mechanisms underlying sensitivity and resistance of RET inhibitors is required to improve outcomes for these patients.

Imaging Features and Patterns of Metastasis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with RET Rearrangements.

Rearranged during transfection proto-oncogene (RET) fusions represent a potentially targetable oncogenic driver in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Imaging features and metastatic patterns of advanced RET fusion-positive (RET+) NSCLC are not well established. Our goal was to compare the imaging features and patterns of metastases in RET+, ALK+ and ROS1+ NSCLC. Patients with RET+, ALK+, or ROS1+ NSCLC seen at our institution between January 2014 and December 2018 with available pre-treatment imaging were identified. The clinicopathologic features, imaging characteristics, and the distribution of metastases were reviewed and compared. We identified 215 patients with NSCLC harboring RET, ALK, or ROS1 gene fusion (RET = 32; ALK = 116; ROS1 = 67). Patients with RET+ NSCLC were older at presentation compared to ALK+ and ROS1+ patients (median age: RET = 64 years; ALK = 51 years, p < 0.001; ROS = 54 years, p = 0.042) and had a higher frequency of neuroendocrine histology (RET = 12%; ALK = 2%, p = 0.025; ROS1 = 0%, p = 0.010). Primary tumors in RET+ patients were more likely to be peripheral (RET = 69%; ALK = 47%, p = 0.029; ROS1 = 36%, p = 0.003), whereas lobar location, size, and density were comparable across the three groups. RET+ NSCLC was associated with a higher frequency of brain metastases at diagnosis compared to ROS1+ NSCLC (RET = 32%, ROS1 = 10%; p = 0.039. Metastatic patterns were otherwise similar across the three molecular subgroups, with high incidences of lymphangitic carcinomatosis, pleural metastases, and sclerotic bone metastases. RET+ NSCLC shares several distinct radiologic features and metastatic spread with ALK+ and ROS1+ NSCLC. These features may suggest the presence of RET fusions and help identify patients who may benefit from further molecular genotyping.

Association of genetic and immuno-characteristics with clinical outcomes in patients with RET-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Rearranged during transfection (RET) has been proven to be a tumorigenic target in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). In RET-rearranged NSCLCs, molecular features and their impact on prognosis were not well illustrated, and the activity of mainstay therapeutics has not currently been well compared. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with NSCLCs with RET rearrangements were analyzed for concomitant mutations, tumor mutation burden (TMB), PD-L1 expression, T cell receptor repertoire and clinical outcomes with chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and multikinase inhibitors (MKIs). RESULTS: Among 129 patients with RET-rearranged NSCLC who were analyzed, 41.1% (53/129) had co-occurring genetic alterations by next-generation sequencing, and concomitant TP53 mutation appeared most frequently (20/53, 37.7%). Patients with concurrent TP53 mutation (n = 15) had shorter overall survival than those without (n = 30; median, 18.4 months [95% CI, 8.6-39.1] vs 24.8 months [95% CI, 11.7-52.8]; P < 0.05). Patients with lower peripheral blood TCR diversity (n = 5) had superior overall survival compared with those with higher diversity (n = 6; median, 18.4 months [95% CI, 16.9-19.9] vs 4.8 months [95% CI, 4.5-5.3]; P = 0.035). An association with overall survival was not observed for PD-L1 expression nor for tumor mutation burden level. Median progression-free survival was not significantly different across chemotherapy, ICIs, and MKIs (median, 3.5 vs 2.5 vs 3.8 months). For patients treated with ICIs, the disease control rate was 60% (6/10) and the objective response rate was 20% (2/10). CONCLUSIONS: RET-rearranged lung cancers can be heterogeneous in terms of concomitant genetic alterations. Patients with concurrent TP53 mutation or high peripheral blood TCR repertoire diversity have relatively inferior overall survival in this series. Outcomes with traditional systemic therapies in general are suboptimal.